Infliximab for reactive arthritis secondary to Chlamydia trachomatis infection

Management of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postinfectious inflammatory arthritis can result from various pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Prompt identification and treatment of acute infection is vital, but some cases progress to chronic arthritis despite successful treatment of infection. Postinfectious inflammatory arthritis varies from mild, self-limited arthralgia to severe, refractory arthritis, necessitating ongoing disease-modifying treatment. This review explores the spectrum of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis to provide insights into effective management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research continues regarding the benefit of antimicrobial therapy, beyond treatment of the acute infection, to diminish the severity of postinfectious inflammatory arthritis. Following treatment of acute infection, most cases are self-limited so treatment is symptomatic. However, a difficult-to-predict fraction of cases develop chronic postinfectious inflammatory arthritis that can be challenging to manage. Recently, as more biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have become available, treatment options have expanded.

SUMMARY

In this article, we use the term 'postinfectious inflammatory arthritis' rather than 'reactive arthritis' because it describes a broader spectrum of diseases and emphasizes the common pathogenesis of a postinfectious inflammatory process. We summarize the conventional therapies and recent management developments for the most frequently encountered postinfectious inflammatory arthritides.

Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced arthritis and reactive arthritis to inform therapeutic strategy

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA) is a relatively new disease entity caused by ICI agents during cancer therapy. Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a well-known disease entity caused by urogenital or gastrointestinal bacterial infection or pneumonia. In this sense, ICI-IA and ReA are both defined by a reaction to a well-specified causal event. As a result, comparing these diseases may help to determine therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

We compared ICI-IA and ReA with special focus on pharmacological management. Specifically regarding treatment, we conducted a literature search of studies published in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria were studies on treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids (GC), or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in ICI-IA or ReA. During systematic selection, 21 studies evaluating ICI-IA and 14 studies evaluating ReA were included.

RESULTS

In ICI-IA, prospective and retrospective studies have shown effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoid (GC), sulfasalazine (SSZ), methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and TNFi. In ReA, retrospective studies evaluated NSAIDs and GC. A randomized controlled trial reported the effect of SSZ, and a retrospective study reported the effect of MTX and SSZ in combination with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition (TNFi). For both entities, small case reports show treatment effects of interleukin 6 receptor inhibition (IL-6Ri).

DISCUSSION

This literature review identified both similarities and differences regarding the pathogenesis and clinical features of ReA and ICI-IA. Studies on treatment reported effectiveness of NSAIDs, GC, MTX, SSZ and TNFi in both diseases. Further, small case reports showed effects of IL-6Ri.

British Association of Sexual Health and HIV national guideline on the management of sexually acquired reactive arthritis 2021

These guidelines update the 2008 UK guideline for the management of sexually acquired reactive arthritis. The guideline is aimed at those over the age of 16 years, presenting to healthcare professionals working in sexual health services. The recommendations are primarily aimed at services offering level 3 care in sexually transmitted infection management within the United Kingdom. However, the principles will apply to those presenting to level 1 and 2 services, and appropriate local referral pathways will need to be developed.

Treatment of reactive arthritis with biological agents: a review

The pathogenesis of reactive arthritis (ReA) has not been fully elucidated. In recent years, many researchers have confirmed that multiple cytokines are involved in the occurrence and development of ReA. Although ReA is self-limiting, it is still incurable for some patients who have no or a weak response to traditional drugs, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. This is called refractory reactive arthritis. Currently, there is insufficient evidences for the treatment of refractory ReA with biological agents, though biological agents against cytokines have been developed over the past few years. This review summarizes the current development of clinical treatments of ReA with biological agents, which provides future investigations on refractory ReA with more evidence and references.

Reactive arthritis: developments and challenges in diagnosis and treatment

Reactive arthritis (ReA) has traditionally been described as a nonseptic arthritis occurring in the joint following an extra-articular bacterial infection. This concept became clinically associated with antecedent infections of either the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. Yet this operational definition of ReA has led to diagnostic uncertainty in different clinical settings. There are several scenarios in which the ReA has been complex. One is in the SAPHO syndrome, which shares many features with ReA. Another is the development of arthritis after infection with atypical organisms such as Clostridium difficile and Giardia lamblia. Treatment of ReA remains an area of ongoing investigation. There has been a randomized controlled trial of combination antibiotics in Chlamydia-induced ReA, which reported a positive result. There are several uncontrolled reports of anti-TNF agents being used successfully in refractory ReA. These studies in treatment modalities require validation on larger samples but do provide some encouraging preliminary findings from which to develop new therapeutic approaches.

The molecular basis for disease phenotype in chronic Chlamydia-induced arthritis

Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections can elicit an inflammatory arthritis in some individuals, and recent surprising studies have demonstrated that only ocular (trachoma) strains, not genital strains, of the organism are present in the synovial tissues of patients with the disease. This observation suggests an explanation for the small proportion of genitally-infected patients who develop Chlamydia-induced arthritis. Other recent studies have begun to identify the specific chlamydial gene products that elicit the synovial inflammatory response during both active and quiescent disease, although much more study will be required to complete the understanding of that complex process of host-pathogen interaction. Several newly developed experimental methods and approaches for study of the process will enable identification of new therapeutic targets, and possibly strategies for prevention of the disease altogether.

Treating reactive arthritis: insights for the clinician

THERE ARE TWO MAIN FORMS OF REACTIVE ARTHRITIS (REA): postvenereal and postdysentery. Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is the major causative organism of the postvenereal type; Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia are the major triggers for the postenteric type. All of these causative organisms have been shown to traffic to the synovium in affected individuals. However, one important difference is that the chlamydial organisms have been shown to be viable, whereas, in general, the postenteric organisms are not. Although estimates vary widely, it is felt that 30-50% of all cases of ReA become chronic and the remainder resolve spontaneously within weeks to months. These important differences need to be considered when reviewing the available therapeutic outcomes data. There is a relative paucity of prospective clinical trial data assessing various treatment strategies. A large breadth of clinical experience demonstrates that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids are efficacious, but there have only been two rather small trials assessing NSAIDs and none with corticosteroids. Disease modifying drugs are sometimes utilized in more severe or chronic cases, but only sulfasalazine (SSZ) has been studied. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy has proved remarkably efficacious with other types of spondyloarthritides, but there is very little data to support their use in ReA; theoretical concerns also exist with this drug class in ReA, specifically. Finally, antibiotics have been studied in several trials. A thorough analysis of these trials reveals equivocal results with a possible particular benefit in postchlamydial ReA. These data are reviewed with an emphasis on postchlamydial and postenteric ReA.

Use of biologic agents in ocular manifestations of rheumatic disease

Biologic agents have dramatically shifted the treatment paradigm for rheumatic disease. Use of these agents can decrease disease burden, allow the patient to be weaned from corticosteroids, and reduce the likelihood of relapse. Eye disease associated with rheumatic conditions may present with a wide range of signs and symptoms. This coexisting pathology should not be overlooked and should be considered a reason for initiation or continuation of biologic therapy. Additionally, many of the ocular manifestations of rheumatic disease respond preferentially to specific targeting molecules. This paper summarizes the available studies on the use, efficacy, and safety of biologic agents in the treatment of ocular manifestations of rheumatic disease.

Successful use of etanercept for the treatment of Reiter's syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

The treatment of severe and refractory cases of reactive arthritis is not well defined. There is a limited data about the use of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blockers in reactive arthritis. Herein is a description of a patient with severe case of Chlamydia trachomatis-related reactive arthritis that was refractory to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfasalazine, prednisone, and methotrexate and was successfully treated with etanercept.

Reactive arthritis

Reactive arthritis (ReA) can be defined as the development of sterile inflammatory arthritis as a sequel to remote infection, often in the gastrointestinal or urogenital tract. Although no generally agreed-upon diagnostic criteria exist, the diagnosis is mainly clinical, and based on acute oligoarticular arthritis of larger joints developing within 2-4 weeks of the preceding infection. According to population-based studies, the annual incidence of ReA is 0.6-27/100,000. In addition to the typical clinical picture, the diagnosis of ReA relies on the diagnosis of the triggering infection. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 should not be used as a diagnostic tool for a diagnosis of acute ReA. In the case of established ReA, prolonged treatment of Chlamydia-induced ReA may be of benefit, not only in the case of acute ReA but also in those with chronic ReA or spondylarthropathy with evidence of persisting chlamydia antigens in the body. In other forms of ReA, there is no confirmed evidence in favour of antibiotic therapy to shorten the duration of acute arthritis. The outcome and prognosis of ReA are best known for enteric ReA, whereas studies dealing with the long-term outcome of ReA attributable to Chlamydia trachomatis are lacking.

Combination antibiotics for the treatment of Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis: is a cure in sight?

The inflammatory arthritis that develops in some patients subsequent to urogenital infection by the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis, and that induced subsequent to pulmonary infection with C. pneumoniae, both have proved difficult to treat in either their acute or chronic forms. Over the last two decades, molecular genetic and other studies of these pathogens have provided a good deal of information regarding their metabolic and genetic structures, as well as the detailed means by which they interact with their host cells. In turn, these insights have provided for the first time a window into the bases for treatment failures for the inflammatory arthritis. In this article we discuss the biological bases for those treatment failures, provide suggestions as to research directions that should allow improvement in treatment modalities, and speculate on how treatment regimens that currently show promise might be significantly improved over the near future using nanotechological means.

[Reactive arthritis: from pathogenesis to novel strategies]

Reactive arthritis (ReA) was first described 100 years ago. It is defined as a sterile joint inflammation following a primary, extra-articular infection often in the form of urethritis or enteritis and less frequently respiratory infection and is characterized by the presence of bacterial antigens or non-culturable bacteria in the joint,. The prevalence is estimated to be 40/100,000 adults, while the incidence is 4-5/100,000. The classic HLA-B27-associated form with asymmetric involvement of the lower extremities and/or the spine is part of the spondyloarthritis concept. The phenomenon of persistence, which will be discussed in detail herein, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ReA. Up to 30% of patients develop chronic symptoms posing a therapeutic challenge. Combination antibiotic treatment showing a response in up to 63% of patients has recently been proposed. Biologics could represent an alternative therapeutic option for patients showing a severe and highly active disease course.