Improved real-life adherence of 6-monthly denosumab injections due to positive feedback based on rapid 6-month BMD increase and good safety profile

Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications

Background

Rani Therapeutics is developing a robotic pill (RP), an oral drug delivery platform called RaniPill™ that can deliver a number of biotherapeutics with high bioavailability; eliminating the need for injections. While patients in general prefer oral to injectable therapies, preference for a more frequent oral regimen compared to a less frequent injectable regimen is unknown. Two marketing surveys were conducted to gather data on preference for oral versus injectable therapies. A clinical study gathered data on participant preference for oral pills vs injections before and after swallowing a Mock-RP capsule.

Methods

A total of 1689 adults taking injections (mean duration 3-7 years) to treat endocrine or inflammatory conditions were anonymously surveyed online for their preference to administer/prescribe medications orally via the RP. In the clinical study, 150 participants currently taking injections for chronic conditions evaluated the swallowability of a Mock-RP and completed a questionnaire regarding their preferences.

Results

Majority of respondents surveyed stated they would be willing to convert to an oral alternative over their current parenteral therapy regardless of drug or disease. In the clinical study, all participants were able to swallow the Mock-RP and 91% indicated their preference for the oral route versus their current parenteral route of drug administration. Survey respondents and those in the clinical study using frequent injections were more willing to select a once-daily capsule compared to those injecting infrequently. Even study participants who inject infrequently (≥monthly: 80%) would prefer a once-daily pill over their injection regimen.

Conclusion

Patients taking injections and prescribing physicians strongly prefer oral dosing to parenteral administration of biologics even if dosing frequency with the oral option, such as the RP, is increased.

Nocebo-associated treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in randomized-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Nocebo is a concept of therapeutics referring to unpleasant symptoms attributed by a patient to a drug, due to negative anticipation. Patients receiving oral anti-osteoporotic drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCT) can experience adverse events leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment discontinuation for these drugs. In this study we aim to investigate the nocebo effect of subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs with a higher compliance rate than orally administered drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for double-blind trials investigating subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs for osteoporosis (namely, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab) published up to May 2023.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms ("nocebo dropouts").

RESULTS

Data from 17 trials were extracted. Among 10,529 placebo-treated patients the pooled nocebo-dropout percentage was 3 % for denosumab (average: 0.03; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.05), 1 % for romosozumab (average: 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.00-0.03) and 6 % for teriparatide and abaloparatide (average: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.07). Nocebo-dropouts were significantly higher in men than women (6 % vs. 3 %, respectively, p = 0.012), in older (mean age >68 years) than in younger patients (5 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.017) and in those with more severe osteoporosis (based on the percentage of participants with prior fragility-related fractures in the study cohort) compared with patients with no prior fracture history (4 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Nocebo responses may contribute to treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Higher nocebo-related dropout rates in the higher-risk RCT population (older patients, males, those with prior fractures) show that nocebo mechanisms have the potential to hinder therapeutic efforts to specific populations who would benefit most. Prospero registration number CRD42020212843.

Adherence of denosumab treatment for low bone mineral density in Japanese people living with HIV: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Long-term care issues, specifically metabolic bone disorders, are a concern for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) who undergo life-long antiretroviral therapy (ART). Previous clinical trials with denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody inhibitor, have revealed its effectiveness in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with osteoporosis. However, there are limited data on adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in PLWH. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in Japanese PLWH.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective exploratory analysis of 29 Japanese PLWH who initiated denosumab treatment for osteoporosis, between 2013 and 2021. The study included patients who received at least one dose of denosumab every 6 months. Adherence and persistence were defined as receiving two consecutive injections of denosumab 6 months ± 4 weeks apart and 6 months + 8 weeks apart, respectively. The primary outcome measure of the study was the adherence of denosumab treatment for 24 months. The secondary outcome measures included treatment persistence and BMD. The period after January 2020 was defined as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period, and its impact on adherence was investigated.

RESULTS

The treatment adherence rates at 12 and 24 months were 89.7% and 60.7%, respectively. By contrast, the treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 100% and 85.7%, respectively. More patients in the group who initiated denosumab treatment after the COVID-19 pandemic reached non-adherence than in the group who initiated denosumab treatment before the pandemic. BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck significantly increased compared to that at baseline, with median percentage changes of 8.7% (p < 0.001) and 3.5% (p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that patients in the study had a high rate of non-adherence but a lower rate of non-persistence. Additionally, PLWH on ongoing ART experienced increased BMD with denosumab treatment. This study provides an opportunity to improve future strategies for denosumab treatment in the Japanese PLWH.

Comparative efficacy different resistance training protocols on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective: To systematically review the effects of different resistance training (RT) protocols on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the resistance training in improving bone mineral density for postmenopausal women were searched in databases including ProQuest, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The retrieval time range was from the establishment of the database to May 2022. The included literature was independently screened and relevant data was extracted by two reviewers. The systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for reviews of quantitative evidence. Quality of risk was assessed using the Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, risk of bias was assessedusing the Cochrane RoB2 tool and a network Meta-analysis was performed on the data using Stata 16.0. Results: A total of 19 studies, which included 919 subjects, were eventually acquired. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that moderate intensity resistance training was superior in improving lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) and femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) compared to the control group (as per usual daily life), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). There was, however, no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of increasing total hip bone mineral density (TH BMD) and trochanter bone mineral density (Troch BMD), although moderate intensity training tends to increase bone mineral density (p > 0.05). In addition, when training frequency is taken into consideration, 3 days/week of moderate intensity training (3MI) was superior to 2 days/week (2MI) in improving lumbar spine bone mineral density , and moderate intensity training was superior to low and high intensity resistance trainings at training frequency of 3 day/week, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). The cumulative probability ranking results indicated that 3MI was the optimal option in improving lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip and Troch bone mineral density. Subgroup analyses combining interventions time showed that for lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density, 3MI protocol with intervention duration within 1 year (≤48 weeks) had a significant advantage over other interventions, while this advantage was no longer significant with the intervention duration of more than 1 year (>48 weeks). Conclusion: Current evidence shows that moderate intensity resistance training for 3 days/week can be preferred clinically to improve bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, and it is recommended that the duration of the same training should not exceed 1 year. Nevertheless, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Development and Characterization of Novel In-Situ-Forming Oleogels

PLGA-based in situ forming implants (ISFI) often require a high amount of potentially toxic solvents such as N methyl-Pyrrolidone (NMP). The aim of the present study was to develop lipid in-situ-forming oleogels (ISFOs) as alternative delivery systems. 12-Hydroxystearic acid (12-HSA) was selected as the oleogelling agent and three different oleoformulations were investigated: (a) 12-HSA, peanut oil (PO), NMP; (b) 12-HSA, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), ethanol; (c) 12-HSA, isopropyl myristate (IPM), ethanol. The effects of the 12-HSA concentration, preparation method, and composition on the mechanical stability were examined using a texture analysis and oscillating rheology. The texture analysis was used to obtain information on the compression strength. The amplitude sweeps were analyzed to provide information on the gel strength and the risk of brittle fractures. The frequency sweeps allowed insights into the long-term stability and risk of syneresis. The syringeability of the ISFOs was tested, along with their acute and long-term cytotoxicity in vitro. The developed ISFOs have the following advantages: (1) the avoidance of highly acidic degradation products; (2) low amounts of organic solvents required; (3) low toxicity; (4) low injection forces, even with small needle sizes. Therefore, ISFOs are promising alternatives to the existing polymer/NMP-based ISFIs.

Predictors for self-discontinuation of anti-osteoporosis medication: A hospital-based real-world study

Osteoporotic fractures have a tremendous impact on quality of life and may contribute to fatality, but half of patients may discontinue their anti-osteoporosis medication. The study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the persistence of anti-osteoporosis medication. Between June 2016 and June 2018, we recruited 1195 participants discontinuing prior anti-osteoporosis medication. Telephone interviews were conducted to discern the reasons for discontinuation. Comparisons among groups and risks of self-discontinuation were analyzed. Among 694 patients who have no records of continuing anti-osteoporosis medication, 374 (54%) self-discontinued, 64 (9.2%) discontinued due to physicians’ suggestion, and 256 (36.8%) with unintended discontinuation. Among patients with self-discontinuation, 173 (46.3%) forgot to visit outpatient clinics; 92 (24.5%) discontinued because of medication-related factors; 57 (15.2%) thought the severity of osteoporosis had improved and therefore discontinued; 30 (8%) stopped due to economic burden; 22 (5.9%) were lost to follow-up because of newly diagnosed diseases other than osteoporosis. Additionally, older age, male gender, calcium supplement, teriparatide therapy and hip fractures in teriparatide users were associated with adherence to anti-osteoporosis drugs. In conclusion, our results indicate that younger age, female gender, non-use of calcium supplements, and anti-resorptive medication were independent risk factors associated with drug discontinuation. Identifying high-risk patients and providing timely health education are crucial for adherence to anti-osteoporosis medication.

Risk Factors for Denosumab Discontinuation in Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

Persistence with treatment is key to achieving successful treatment outcomes in patients with osteoporosis. We investigated risk factors for denosumab discontinuation in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).

METHODS

A total of 333 patients with PMO who had never received osteoporosis treatment were included in this study. Baseline demographics and retention rate of denosumab were evaluated in all patients. Univariate analysis was performed in patients divided into two groups according to whether they had continued or discontinued denosumab. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine risk factors for denosumab discontinuation.

RESULTS

Mean age was 80.7 years, body mass index (BMI) was 21.5 kg/m2, and T-scores for the lumbar spine and femoral neck were -2.7 and -2.8, respectively. The retention rate of denosumab at 36 months was 50.3%. Patients who continued denosumab were younger and had higher BMI, serum albumin (Alb) levels, and lumbar spine bone mineral density, and fewer vertebral fractures (VFs), compared with those who discontinued denosumab. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that a low BMI, low serum Alb levels, and a high number of VFs are independent risk factors for denosumab discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

A low BMI, low serum Alb levels, and a high number of VFs were associated with denosumab discontinuation in patients with PMO.

Clinical Parameters in Osteoporosis Patients Supplemented With PMA-Zeolite at the End of 5-Year Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Osteoporosis is among the most common pathologies. Associated complications in osteoporotic patients, in particular hip fractures and vertebral fractures, cause disabilities and significant quality of life deterioration. Standard treatment of osteoporosis, based on pharmacotherapy does still not yield adequate results, and the problem of osteoporosis remains incompletely solved. Additionally, adverse drug events and fractures after long-termed pharmacotherapy pose additional challenges within designing a proper therapy regimen. Improved clinical approach and new synergistic treatment modalities are consequently still needed. The rationale of the presented study was accordingly, to expand our preclinical animal study on human patients with osteoporosis, based on positive effects on bones observed in animals with osteopenia treated with PMA-zeolite. We specifically monitored effects of PMA-zeolite on the bone quality parameters, fracture risk and quality of life in a cohort of initially recruited 100 osteoporosis patients during a follow-up period of 5 years within a randomized, placebo-controlled and double blinded clinical study (TOP study). Obtained results provide evidence on the PMA-zeolite positive effects on the bone strength of osteoporotic patients as the risk of fractures was significantly decreased in PMA-zeolite-treated patients with respect to time before entering the study (p = 0.002). Statistical evidence point also to positive bone changes in the 5-years TOP study course as evidenced through osteocalcin and beta-cross laps values showing a prevalence of the bone-formation process (p &lt; 0.05). BMD values were not significantly affected after the 5-years follow-up in PMA-zeolite-treated patients in comparison with the Placebo group. Results support the initial expectations based on our previously published preclinical studies on clinoptilolite product PMA-zeolite in animals that could be a new therapeutic option in osteoporosis patients.

Subcutaneous Injection of Drugs: Literature Review of Factors Influencing Pain Sensation at the Injection Site

The subcutaneous administration route is widely used to administer different types of drugs given its high bioavailability and rapid onset of action. However, the sensation of pain at the injection site might reduce patient adherence. Apart from a direct effect of the drug itself, several factors can influence the sensation of pain: needle features, injection site, volume injected, injection speed, osmolality, viscosity and pH of formulation, as well as the kind of excipients employed, including buffers and preservatives. Short and thin needles, conveniently lubricated and with sharp tips, are generally used to minimize pain, although the anatomic injection site (abdomen versus thigh) also affects the sensation of pain. Large subcutaneous injection volumes are associated with pain. In this sense, the maximum volume generally accepted is around 1.5 ml, although volumes of up to 3 ml are well tolerated when injected in the abdomen. Injected volumes of up to 0.5–0.8 ml are not expected to increase substantially the pain produced by the needle insertion. Ideally, injectable products should be formulated as isotonic solutions (osmolality of about 300 mOsm/kg) and no more than 600 mOs/kg have to be used in order to prevent pain. A pH close to the physiological one is recommended to minimize pain, irritation, and tissue damage. Buffers are frequently added to parenteral formulations to optimize solubility and stability by adjusting the pH; however, their strength should be kept as low as possible to avoid pain upon injection. The data available recommend the concentration of phosphate buffer be limited to 10 mM and that the concentration of citrate buffer should be lower than 7.3 mM to avoid an increased sensation of pain. In the case of preservatives, which are required in multiple-dose preparations, m-cresol seems to be more painful than benzyl alcohol and phenol.

Funding: Sandoz SA.

Long-term persistence in patients with osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice: 36-month non-interventional, observational study

Persistence rates over 36 months with denosumab in patients diagnosed with osteoporosis in a real-world setting were examined, along with baseline patient characteristics predictive of persistence. This study represents the longest observational period with denosumab persistence and shows higher persistence rates when compared to bisphosphonates.

INTRODUCTION

The study objective was to describe long-term persistence with denosumab among patients treated for osteoporosis in a real-world setting. We also sought to examine patient characteristics predictive of persistence. Lastly, this study attempted to place the results in context by conducting a literature review of published persistence data for denosumab.

METHODS

This retrospective, non-interventional study analyzed 1158 patients from a specialty community private practice to assess patient persistence with denosumab in routine care. Persistence was defined as receiving seven denosumab injections, using an 8-week permissible gap, over 36 months. Non-persistent patients were further investigated retrospectively to identify reasons for discontinuation, when available.

RESULTS

Demographic analysis showed a population of 1158 patients with mean age 68.4 years old and baseline T-score - 2.7; nearly half of which experienced a prior osteoporosis-related fracture. In a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 36-month persistence overall was 50.7%. Net persistence, as defined by receiving seven injections in the allowable time frame, was 64.2% of the cohort. In a multivariate analysis, prior vertebral fractures and recent osteoporosis therapy were associated with higher persistence; age greater than 75 years was associated with non-persistence. Reasons for discontinuation were available in 91.6% of non-persistent patients and categorized to include the ten most common explanations.

CONCLUSION

This study to our knowledge represents the longest continuous observational period providing data on denosumab persistence in a real-world setting. The total persistence noted is quite robust when compared to bisphosphonates and is within the upper range of prior published studies of denosumab with shorter observation periods.

Medication-taking behaviour in Bulgarian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab or monthly oral bisphosphonates

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is critical for fracture risk reduction. This observational study evaluated medication-taking behaviour of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab or oral ibandronate in real-world clinical practice in Bulgaria. Compared with ibandronate, densoumab was associated with a lower discontinuation rate and greater increases in bone mineral density.

PURPOSE

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is critical for fracture risk reduction and the effectiveness of such treatments may be reduced by low persistence. Alternative therapies such as denosumab may improve persistence. This study aimed to describe medication-taking behaviour in women with osteoporosis, prescribed denosumab or oral ibandronate, in Bulgarian clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicentre chart review (with up to 24 months follow-up) enrolled postmenopausal women initiating 6-monthly denosumab injection or monthly oral ibandronate treatment for osteoporosis between 1 October 2011 and 30 September 2012.

RESULTS

Overall, 441 women were enrolled (224 had initiated denosumab, 217 had initiated ibandronate). At baseline, more women in the denosumab group than in the ibandronate group had a previous fracture (25.5 vs 17.5%; p = 0.043) and past exposure to osteoporosis therapy (19.6 vs 12.0%; p = 0.028). At 24 months, 4.5% of women receiving denosumab had discontinued therapy compared with 56.2% of women receiving ibandronate. Median time to discontinuation was longer in the denosumab group (729 days; interquartile range (IQR), 728.3-729.0) than in the ibandronate group (367 days; IQR, 354.0-484.8; p < 0.001). At 24 months, there were significantly greater changes in BMD T-scores at the lumbar spine (p < 0.001) and femoral neck (p < 0.001) in patients receiving denosumab than in those receiving ibandronate. At 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 98.7%.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study demonstrates there is a low discontinuation rate and high persistence with denosumab. Denosumab was associated with greater BMD increases than ibandronate, which could reduce fracture risk.

Persistence with denosumab therapy in women affected by osteoporosis with fragility fractures: a multicenter observational real practice study in Italy

BACKGROUND

Persistence is commonly considered a key factor for the successful management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Denosumab is the first biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis with satisfying data regarding the persistence with this therapy.

AIM

The purpose of this multicenter observational real practice study was to evaluate the persistence with denosumab treatment in post-menopausal women affected by osteoporosis.

MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Women were recruited in four specialized centers for the management of osteoporosis in North, Center and South of Italy. We included women with a diagnosis of post-menopausal osteoporosis, aged >50 years, able to obtain a prescription according to the Italian reimbursement criteria in force during the study period for anti-osteoporotic pharmacological treatment. They initiated a treatment with subcutaneous denosumab (Prolia^®) 60 mg/every 6 months between November 2011 and May 2016. Women who had received aromatase inhibitors were excluded. Patients were assessed at baseline and every 6 months for all treatment length. Persistence data were evaluated for a total of 36 months.

RESULTS

Eight hundred seventy women were enrolled; mean aged 70 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.8 ± 4.1 kg/m². At the Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment, the mean lumbar spine T-score was -2.76 ± 1.14 standard deviations (SD) and the mean femoral neck T-score was -2.49 ± 0.80 SD. During the study, the total persistence was 91.4%. Total dropouts were 75 (8.6%), higher within the initial 6-month period of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence to denosumab treatment in our observational real practice study was very high. These results suggest that factors such as frequency of visits, pharmacological schedule, and opportunity to call the doctor might play an important role in the persistence and adherence to treatment to obtain maximum therapeutic effect and avoid further fragility fractures.

Frequency of discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapies in US patients over 2 years

Little is known about treatment patterns with injectable osteoporosis therapies. At 12 months, the probability of discontinuation was 69.1% among patients using ibandronate, followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment. The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation.

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to assess the frequency of treatment discontinuation over time among patients who initiate injectable osteoporosis therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study utilized an administrative claims database to measure discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapy, reported at 6-month intervals over 2 years. Eligible patients were aged ≥55 years, had newly initiated injectable osteoporosis therapy between January 2008 and June 2012, and were continuously enrolled in the health plan for ≥1 year prior to and ≥1.5 years after the date the first injectable medication was received (the index date). Follow-up time ranged from 18 to 24 months. Injectable osteoporosis treatments included in the analysis were denosumab, ibandronate, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid. Discontinuation was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and was defined at each time point as the percentage of patients who did not receive the dose scheduled for that time point. A 90-day grace period was allowed to accommodate flexibility in the scheduling of post-index re-administrations. Sensitivity analyses assessed discontinuation using grace periods of 60 and 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 4756 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, with 617 utilizing denosumab, 233 ibandronate, 778 teriparatide, and 3128 zoledronic acid. At 12 months, discontinuation was highest among patients using ibandronate (69.1%), followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment: 87.5% for ibandronate, 87.9% for teriparatide, 79.8% for zoledronic acid, and 64.3% for denosumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation.

[Male osteoporosis]

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis in men is an important public health problem with more than 1 million cases in Germany. Although osteoporotic fractures have a much higher mortality in men than in women, male patients are still underdiagnosed and undertreated.

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiology of male osteoporosis and current treatment situation, pathophysiological aspects at the hormonal level, risk factors, diagnostic work-up and therapeutic options.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Overview of data concerning male osteoporosis, recommendations for diagnostic work-up and presentation of the study situation on pharmaceutical therapies.

RESULTS

As risk factors for osteoporosis are present in 50-70 % of male patients, a detailed patient history is necessary for assessment of the risk factors. Radiological imaging of the spine is primarily recommended to identify individuals with prevalent vertebral fractures, as approximately 10 % of males above the age of 50 years have suffered a vertebral fracture. Laboratory testing of relevant parameters helps to rule out other metabolic bone diseases. In Germany, specific medications available for the treatment of male osteoporosis comprise the active vitamin D analogue alfacalcidol, the oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate, the intravenous biphosphonate zoledronic acid, the anti- receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) antibody denosumab, which can be given as intravenous injection and strontium ranelate, a drug with a complex mode of action. Teriparatide, a recombinant form of the 34 N-terminal amino acid sequence of parathyroid hormone is the only anabolic agent approved for male osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis in men is increasingly being recognized as an important public health problem and affected patients need to be adequately diagnosed and treated. Nowadays, a broad spectrum of well-proven therapeutic options with different modes of action allow individual treatment strategies for male osteoporosis patients.

Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence

Patient adherence to many osteoporosis treatments, primarily bisphosphonates, is generally poor, thus leading to a significant reduction in antifracture efficacy. Patient perceptions about the necessity of the prescribed medication to treat osteoporosis and the concerns about the potential adverse effects are important and potentially modifiable determinants of adherence, in addition to other factors, such as difficult dosing regimens and high dosing frequency. Denosumab (Dmab) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), which, through the prevention of the RANKL/RANK interaction, inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and significantly reduces the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. It is administered subcutaneously every 6 months for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Preference and adherence to Dmab treatment were assessed in various clinical trials. Although with some limitations, available data suggest that Dmab is preferred to bisphosphonates, produces greater satisfaction than bisphosphonates, and would be preferentially chosen for long-term treatment. Moreover, patient perceptions about the necessity of Dmab treatment clearly outweigh the concerns about the injections, and positive beliefs about treatment positively influence medication-taking behavior. According to these data, Dmab may represent a reasonable alternative to bisphosphonates, particularly for osteoporotic women in whom a suboptimal or even poor adherence to oral treatments is expected.

Anti-Osteoporotic Therapy After Fragility Fracture Lowers Rate of Subsequent Fracture: Analysis of a Large Population Sample

BACKGROUND

This investigation assessed the effectiveness of initiating anti-osteoporotic therapy after a fragility fracture in preventing subsequent fractures.

METHODS

The Truven Health MarketScan databases, which contain de-identified, integrated, person-specific claim data, were queried from 2003 to 2012. The study population included individuals fifty years of age or older who sustained a fragility fracture, defined as any fracture of the wrist, proximal part of the humerus, hip, or vertebra, and had three years of continuous enrollment following fracture. Patients were stratified into either an anti-osteoporotic therapy group or a no-treatment group. Subsequent fracture was defined as a fragility fracture occurring more than ninety days following the index fracture. Subjects were followed for three years. Unadjusted and age and sex-adjusted odds ratios for subsequent fracture were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

This investigation included 31,069 subjects, of whom 10.6% were treated with anti-osteoporotic therapy following the index fracture. The anti-osteoporotic therapy group was older and had a greater proportion of female patients compared with the no-treatment group. The three-year subsequent fracture rates were 7.5% in the anti-osteoporotic therapy group and 9.7% in the no-treatment group. Unadjusted odds ratios for subsequent fracture showed that the anti-osteoporotic therapy group experienced a risk reduction of 33% after an index wrist fracture, 48% after an index proximal humeral fracture, 28% after an index hip fracture, 20% after an index vertebral fracture, and 25% after all fractures combined. Age and sex-adjusted odds ratios showed that the anti-osteoporotic therapy group experienced a reduction in risk of 50% after an index wrist fracture, 52% after an index proximal humeral fracture, 34% after an index hip fracture, 43% after an index vertebral fracture, and 40% after all fractures combined. The number needed to treat to prevent a subsequent fragility fracture was twenty-eight after an index wrist fracture, twenty after an index proximal humeral fracture, twenty-six after an index hip fracture, twenty-five after an index vertebral fracture, and twenty-seven after all fractures combined.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with anti-osteoporotic therapy after a fragility fracture leads to a 40% decrease in the three-year risk of subsequent fracture, when adjusted for age and sex. Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy following a fragility fracture can prevent a subsequent fracture over the following three years in approximately one of every twenty-seven patients treated.

Uptake and characteristics of zoledronic acid and denosumab patients and physicians in Ontario, Canada: impact of drug formulary access

The addition of Limited Use criteria (less restrictive access) for zoledronic acid resulted in an immediate and significant increase in uptake and resulted in differences in patient/physician characteristics. In comparison, the uptake of denosumab (only listed with Limited Use) was rapid. Thus, formulary access restrictions have significant implications for prescribing.

INTRODUCTION

We sought to describe the use of zoledronic acid and denosumab by physicians and patients over time and examine the impact of a 2012 provincial formulary modification that removed the administrative burden on physicians when prescribing zoledronic acid.

METHODS

We identified users of zoledronic acid and denosumab using Ontario pharmacy claims data. The number of new patients and physicians was plotted and examined over time. Interrupted time series analysis examined the impact of a formulary modification to zoledronic acid use and prescribing. Descriptive characteristics of patients and prescribers were summarized pre- and post-formulary modification for zoledronic acid and overall for denosumab.

RESULTS

We identified 1463 zoledronic acid patients treated by 627 physicians and 16,736 denosumab patients treated by 2904 physicians. In the first 2 months on the market, we identified a rapid uptake of denosumab (>450 physicians and >1200 patients) in contrast to zoledronic acid (<10 physicians and <10 patients). Zoledronic acid use increased significantly in the 2-month post-formulary change, yet no change in denosumab was observed. Prior to the formulary modification, more zoledronic acid patients had a history of osteoporosis therapy (41 vs. 26%) or bone density testing (30 vs. 10%). Compared to zoledronic patients (post-formulary modification), more denosumab patients had prior osteoporosis therapy (55 vs. 26%), yet fewer had a gastrointestinal diagnosis (6 vs. 11%).

CONCLUSION

We identified a rapid uptake of denosumab in only 15 months of observation. A provincial formulary modification to zoledronic acid resulted in an increase in utilization and impacted patient characteristics.

Adherence to denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis and its utilization in the Czech Republic

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to analyze adherence and current trends in utilization and prescription practice patterns of the anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).

METHODS

The prescription-based database of the General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic that covers approximately 60% of the Czech population (6 million) was used as the data source. Medication possession ratio (MPR) and persistence were calculated for all patients (both OP medication-naïve and medication-experienced) with postmenopausal OP from the start of their therapy with denosumab 60 mg per ml subcutaneous injection within a period between September 2011, i.e. first denosumab availability, and May 2014. Clinical data such as fractures, co-morbidities and co-medication were not analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 7904 women treated with denosumab were analyzed; 93.8% of patients were identified as compliant (MPR ≥0.8) while 6.2% were non-compliant (MPR < 0.8). Persistence (base case, i.e. refill gap ≤30 days) was 59.1% after 12 months and 34.8% after 24 months. By 2013, i.e. within 2 years, denosumab became the second most utilized and most costly drug after oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite relatively high MPR and persistence rate observed in denosumab treatment, adherence enhancing strategies, focused on persistence in particular, are still needed. The uptake of denosumab has been rapid, its utilization keeps rising swiftly, and denosumab already represents a significant part of the osteoporosis therapy budget.

Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology and treatment with denosumab

Osteoporosis is a major public health care concern. Although often described as a disease affecting postmenopausal women, researchers and clinicians have emphasized its prevalence in men in recent years. The National Osteoporosis Foundation has stated that up to 25% of men over the age of 50 years will experience a fracture due to osteoporosis. Men who suffer from a major fracture have higher mortality rates than women. Pharmacologic therapy options for treating osteoporosis are limited for men as compared with women, so each medication approved for use in this population represents an important clinical option. In September 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a new indication for denosumab to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody and novel antiresorptive agent that works by binding receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-β ligand (RANKL) and inhibiting the signaling cascade that causes osteoclast maturation, activity, and survival. Ultimately, denosumab suppresses bone turnover and increases bone mineral density in both trabecular and cortical bone. Approval for treating osteoporosis in men was based on data from the ADAMO trial which displayed efficacy in increasing bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, hip trochanter, and one-third radius. Studies indicate that denosumab is effective and safe, and has superior adherence rates and patient satisfaction. Although long-term data and further research on fracture reduction rates in men should be explored, at this time denosumab is one of several appropriate first-line treatment options for men with osteoporosis.

An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide

About two thirds of patients with a procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) increase of >80 μg/l at 1 month after starting teriparatide therapy showed a ≥10 % increase in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline at 12 months. We recommend this algorithm as an aid in the clinical management of patients treated with daily teriparatide.

INTRODUCTION

An algorithm using PINP is provided in osteoporotic patients with teriparatide treatment. The correlations between the early changes in PINP and the subsequent BMD changes after daily teriparatide therapy were studied to develop an algorithm to monitor patients.

METHODS

We evaluated whether early changes in PINP correlated with the changes in BMD at 12 months and developed an algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the upcoming BMD increases.

RESULTS

The highest correlation coefficient for the relationship between PINP and LS BMD response was determined for the absolute change in PINP at 1 month and the percent change in LS BMD at 12 months (r = 0.36, p <0.01). Using a receiver operator curve analysis, we determined that an 80 μg/l increase in PINP was the most convenient predictor of a 10% increase in LS BMD from baseline (area under curve = 0.72). Using a cut-off value of 80 μg/l, the positive predictive value for predicting a 10% increase in LS BMD from baseline to 12 months was 65%.

CONCLUSION

Greater short-term changes in PINP with teriparatide therapy are associated with greater 12-month increases in LS BMD. About two thirds of patients with a PINP increase of >80 μg/l at 1 month after starting treatment showed a ≥10 % increase in LS BMD from baseline at 12 months. We recommend this algorithm as an aid in the clinical management of patients treated with teriparatide.