Colchicine intoxication in familial Mediterranean fever patients using clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a series of six patients

Inhibition of CYP1A1 Alleviates Colchicine-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Colchicine, a natural compound extracted from Colchicum autumnale, is a phytotoxin, but interestingly, it also has multiple pharmacological activities. Clinically, colchicine is widely used for the treatment of gouty arthritis, familial Mediterranean fever, cardiovascular dysfunction and new coronary pneumonia. However, overdose intake of colchicine could cause lethal liver damage, which is a limitation of its application. Therefore, exploring the potential mechanism of colchicine-induced hepatotoxicity is meaningful. Interestingly, it was found that CYP1A1 played an important role in the hepatotoxicity of colchicine, while it might also participate in its metabolism. Inhibition of CYP1A1 could alleviate oxidative stress and pyroptosis in the liver upon colchicine treatment. By regulating CYP1A1 through the CASPASE-1-GSDMD pathway, colchicine-induced liver injury was effectively relieved in a mouse model. In summary, we concluded that CYP1A1 may be a potential target, and the inhibition of CYP1A1 alleviates colchicine-induced liver injury through pyroptosis regulated by the CASPASE-1-GSDMD pathway.

CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors related colchicine toxicity mimicking septic shock

Colchicine toxicity is uncommon when patients receive a therapeutic dose regularly. However, inadvertent drug interactions can result in unpredicted adverse outcomes. The toxicity of colchicine can manifest in various ways, ranging from mild and non-specific symptoms to severe form known as multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. This case highlights (1) the diagnostic challenge that arises when distinguishing between the severe manifestation of colchicine toxicity and septic shock and (2) concomitant prescription of colchicine with potent CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors (ie, clarithromycin) can lead to colchicine toxicity despite normal renal and hepatic clearance. Unfortunately, specific tests of colchicine toxicity were not routinely available. A high index of clinical suspicion and recognition of drug interactions with their common presentations are crucial for making diagnosis and management. Failure to recognise drug toxicity can result in poor outcomes.

Colchicine and macrolides: a cohort study of the risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant exposure

Colchicine is increasingly used as the number of potential indications expands. However, it also has a narrow therapeutic index that is associated with bothersome to severe side effects. When concomitantly use with medications inhibiting its metabolism, higher plasma levels will result and increase likelihood of colchicine toxicity. We conducted a cohort study using electronic health records comparing encounters with colchicine plus a macrolide and colchicine with an antibiotic non-macrolide. We assessed the relationship between the two groups using adjusted multivariate logistic regression models and the risk of rhabdomyolysis, pancytopenia, muscular weakness, heart failure, acute hepatic failure and death. 12670 patients on colchicine plus an antibiotic non-macrolide were compared to 2199 patients exposed to colchicine plus a macrolide. Patients exposed to colchicine and a macrolide were majority men (n = 1329, 60.4%) and white (n = 1485, 67.5%) in their late sixties (mean age in years 68.4, SD 15.6). Heart failure was more frequent in the colchicine plus a macrolide cohort (n = 402, 18.3%) vs the colchicine non-macrolide one (n = 1153, 9.1%) (p < 0.0001) and also had a higher mortality rate [(85 (3.87%) vs 289 (2.28%), p < 0.0001 macrolides vs non-macrolides cohorts, respectively]. When the sample was limited to individuals exposed to either clarithromycin or erythromycin and colchicine, the adjusted OR for acute hepatic failure was 2.47 (95% CI 1.04–5.91) and 2.06 for death (95% CI 1.07–3.97). There is a significant increase in the risk of hepatic failure and mortality when colchicine is concomitantly administered with a macrolide. Colchicine should not be used concomitantly with these antibiotics or should be temporarily discontinued to avoid toxic levels of colchicine.

Severe Colchicine Intoxication: A Case Report and Review of Literature in Adults

Colchicine is used in the treatment of multiple diseases such as gout and auto-immune diseases. Although cases of multiorgan failure have been described in adults with doses usually higher than 0.8 mg/kg, the epidemiology data are scarce and the intoxication mechanisms are not well-known. The authors present the case of a 66-year-old male patient, with a medical history of depression, admitted to the emergency room (ER) due to intentional colchicine ingestion after taking 90 mg (approximately 1.125 mg/kg) 12 hours prior to medical evaluation. Besides some dizziness and sleepiness, he showed no other alteration in the physical examination. After the administration of activated charcoal, he was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). The laboratory findings showed mild hepatic dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and metabolic lactic acidosis. Despite treatment, severe clinical worsening with multiorgan failure, including respiratory failure complicated with multiple episodes of cardiac dysrhythmias and finally with persistent cardiac arrest, lead to the patient’s death after 13 hours of admission in the ER. Among drug intoxications, high doses of colchicine ingestion can lead to rapid multiorgan dysfunction, and patients with a severe overdose can experience irreversible multiorgan failure without presenting the typical initial gastrointestinal symptoms. Thus, it is necessary for the physicians to be alert to these situations and to be aware of the epidemiological data and clinical profile of this specific poisoning that should be managed in ICU. The authors perform a review of the cases of colchicine poisoning reported in adults between 2017 and 2019 and the differences in clinical management and outcomes.

Evidence of Clinically Meaningful Drug-Drug Interaction With Concomitant Use of Colchicine and Clarithromycin

INTRODUCTION

Colchicine is currently approved for the treatment of gout and familial Mediterranean fever, among other conditions. Clarithromycin, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, dramatically increases colchicine's half-life, augmenting the risk of a life-threatening adverse reaction when used inadvertently with colchicine.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the evidence and clinical implications of concomitant use of colchicine and clarithromycin.

METHODS

Case reports of colchicine-clarithromycin co-administration were searched using the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases were also searched from January 2005 through November 2019 for articles reporting colchicine-clarithromycin concomitant use. Individual reports were reviewed to identify consequences of coadministration, dose, days to onset of interaction, symptoms, evidence of renal disease, time to resolution of symptoms, and Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) rating.

RESULTS

The FAERS search identified 58 reported cases, nearly 53% of which were from patients aged between 65 and 85 years. Of 30 reported deaths, 11 occurred in males, and 19 in females. Other frequent complications reported in FAERS included diarrhea (31%), pancytopenia (22%), bone marrow failure (14%), and vomiting (14%). From published literature, we identified 20 case reports of concomitant exposure, 19 of which were rated 'probable' and one 'possible' according to DIPS rating. Of these cases, four 'probable' patients expired. The documented onset of colchicine toxicity occurred within 5 days of starting clarithromycin, and death within 2 weeks of concomitant exposure.

CONCLUSION

Clinical manifestations of colchicine-clarithromycin interaction may resemble other systemic diseases and may be life threatening. Understanding this clinically meaningful interaction can help clinicians avoid unsafe medication combinations.

Colchicine-induced rhabdomyolysis: a review of 83 cases

A 74-year-old man with medical history significant for atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidaemia and coronary artery disease on atorvastatin presented to the emergency department with profound weakness. The patient reports he first noticed his weakness 4 weeks after starting colchicine, prescribed for recurrent pericarditis with pericardial effusion, a complication following recent coronary artery bypass grafting. The patient was also on prednisone therapy for presumed post-pericardiotomy syndrome. The weakness involved all four limbs but was more notable in the lower extremities, with preserved sensation and tenderness to palpation. Labs showed an elevated creatinine phosphokinase and serum creatinine consistent with rhabdomyolysis. Discontinuation of the offending medications, including colchicine and atorvastatin, as well as intravenous fluid resuscitation with physical rehabilitation, led to improvement in the patient's symptoms. He was eventually discharged to a rehabilitation facility to continue physical therapy.

"Helicobacter pylori in familial mediterranean fever: A series of 120 patients from literature and from france"

INTRODUCTION

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), the most common monogenic auto-inflammatory disease, is characterized by recurrent febrile abdominal pain. Helicobacter pylori infection (HPI), one of the most frequent infections worldwide, can mimic an FMF attack.

OBJECTIVES

Identify FMF patients with HPI in a cohort of French FMF patients and the literature and identify features allowing to distinguish HPI from an FMF attack.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all HPI cases was performed on the cohort of FMF patients fulfilling the Livneh criteria from the French Reference Center for rare Auto-Inflammatory Diseases and Amyloidosis (CEREMAIA). A systematic literature review of HPI in FMF patients was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight French patients developed HPI, whose symptoms of epigastralgia, diarrhea, anorexia/weight loss, and nausea/vomiting differed from their typical abdominal FMF attacks. A total of 112 FMF patients with HPI have been described in the literature, including 61 adults. Diagnosis of HPI was made by gastroscopy (n = 43), labelled urea test (n = 55) or IgG serology by ELISA (n = 12). When performed, C-reactive protein was always elevated. Ten cases of interaction between colchicine and antibiotic therapy for HPI (clarithromycin (n = 9) and azithromycin (n = 1)) were reported.

CONCLUSION

We described a total of 120 patients with typical FMF and HPI. When FMF patients develop atypical abdominal symptoms, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies is essential to eliminate underlying HPI. Untreated HPI can lead to misdiagnosis of colchicine resistance with inappropriate prescription of an interleukin-1 inhibitor at a non-negligible cost.

Colchicine Effectiveness and Safety in Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Adenitis

Introduction: Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) is the most common fever syndrome in childhood. High disease activity (DA) dramatically impacts the health-related quality of life. Thus, effective and safe treatment is crucial. Colchicine might be effective, but data are still lacking. Study aimed to assess colchicine safety and effectiveness in PFAPA. Methods: This single center study was conducted between 03/2012 and 05/2021 in PFAPA patients without variants in genetic panel testing aged ≤ 18 years fulfilling Marshall criteria and classification criteria of Gattorno et al. Exclusion criteria were elevated liver enzymes, impaired kidney function, celiac disease, lactose intolerance, previous/ongoing biologics, known colchicine-intolerance. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, DA, colchicine effectiveness and safety were recorded at baseline, first and last visit. Colchicine was started at 0.5-1.0 mg/day. DA was captured by physician (PGA) and patient/parent (PPGA) global assessment on a 10 cm visual analog scale, categorized as mild (<2), moderate (2-4), and high (≥5). Adverse event (AE) monitoring included gastrointestinal symptoms, liver enzyme/creatinine elevation, leukopenia, neutropenia. Primary outcome included response (R; composite of PPGA + PGA decrease ≥2) at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes were partial response (PR; PGA decrease = 1 + PPGA decrease ≥1), no response (NR; unchanged/worsened PGA/PPGA), colchicine safety, flare characteristics. Results: Twenty-seven PFAPA patients were included, 52% were female, median age was 5.8 years (1-10.75), median follow-up time was 13 months. At baseline, median PPGA was high; median PGA moderate. All patients had febrile flares. Median flare frequency was every 4-5 weeks; median duration 5-6 days. Nine patients were pre-treated with corticosteroids, increasing flare frequency in 8/9. Primary Outcome: 17 patients (63%) were responders. Secondary outcomes: PR was achieved in 15%; NR in 22% at last follow-up. DA decreased significantly (p <0.0001). At last follow-up, 52% reported no flares, median flare duration decreased to 1-2 days. At first follow-up, 22% reported mild abdominal pain/diarrhea. Moderate abdominal pain/diarrhea occurred with ≥1 mg/day. Mild asymptomatic liver enzyme elevation or leucopenia were rare; no severe AE or colchicine discontinuation were observed. Conclusion: Colchicine seems to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in PFAPA patients. It can be considered in children with moderate/high DA even those without corticosteroid-benefit.

[Results of the systematic literature search as basis for the "Evidence-based treatment recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever patients with insufficient response or intolerability to colchicine" of the Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology and the German Society for Rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a genetic disease of childhood and adulthood which is relatively rare in Germany. It is characterized by recurrent febrile attacks, peritonitis, pleuritis and arthritis. The established treatment with colchicine is effective and well-tolerated by most patients; however, some patients do not adequately respond or do not tolerate this treatment. Biologics can be considered for some of these patients. The Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (GKJR) and the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) have agreed to develop joint recommendations for this specific clinical situation.

AIM

Implementation of a systematic literature search (SLR) on the basis of the EULAR recommendations published in 2016 as the foundation for the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations for FMF patients with insufficient response or intolerance to colchicine.

METHODS

The SLR was performed using references from various databases as an update of the SLR carried out by EULAR up to 2014, whereby all articles must have been published between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. The Rayyan abstract tool for the preselection and the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2009 were used for the preparation of the evidence tables.

RESULTS

The search yielded 360 hits and after duplicate matching 263. A total of 88 publications were included (34%) and 102 excluded (39%), a review of the full publication was necessary for a further 73 (28%) and 43 were discussed more intensively. Finally, 64 publications (24%) remained. A total of 4 case-control studies, 31 cohort studies, 8 case series, 7 controlled studies (including 5 abstracts), 10 reviews, 4 meta-analyses and systematic reviews were accepted.

DISCUSSION

The SLR was carried out in a scientifically accurate and transparent manner according to international standards. The SLR proved to be a good basis for a consensus on the 5 overarching principles and the 10 recommendations, so that the joint activity of the GKJR and DGRh was successfully and even promptly concluded. The recommendations are a solid basis for treating patients of all ages with FMF. The explanations on the problem of colchicine resistance play an important role here.

Benefits and adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and colchicine: searching for repurposable drug candidates

Repurposing of antirheumatic drugs has garnered global attention. The aim of this article is to overview available evidence on the use of widely used antirheumatic drugs hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and colchicine for additional indications. Hydroxychloroquine has endothelial stabilizing and anti-thrombotic effects. Its use has been explored as an adjunctive therapy in refractory thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. It may also prevent recurrent pregnancy losses in the absence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Hydroxychloroquine favourably modulates atherogenic lipid and glycaemic profiles. Methotrexate has been tried for modulation of cardiovascular events in non-rheumatic clinical conditions, although a large clinical trial failed to demonstrate a benefit. Colchicine has been shown to successfully reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in a large multicentric trial. Potential antifibrotic effects of colchicine require further exploration. Hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and colchicine are also being tried at different stages of the ongoing Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic for prophylaxis and treatment. While the use of these agents is being diversified, their adverse effects should be timely diagnosed and prevented. Hydroxychloroquine can cause retinopathy and rarely cardiac and auditory toxicity, retinopathy being dose and time dependent. Methotrexate can cause transaminitis, cytopenias and renal failure, particularly in acute overdoses. Colchicine can rarely cause myopathies, cardiomyopathy, cytopenias and transaminitis. Strong evidence is warranted to keep balance between benefits of repurposing these old antirheumatic drugs and risk of their adverse effects.

[Drug interactions with colchicine, are the contraindications well respected? A descriptive study of prescriptions in Brittany based on data from the French National Health Data System]

Although the French Health Authority "ANSM" widely informed healthcare professionals about the risk factors for colchicine overdose, its impact and suitable dosages, cases of potentially fatal preventable overdose continue to be reported in France. Using the French National Health Insurance of the Brittany area, we quantified the proportion of prescriptions presenting an absolute drug contraindication (CI) to colchicine (according to the ANSM Drug Interactions "Thesaurus") and its impact in terms of hospitalisation. Between 2013 and 2016, nearly 77,000 patients (mean age, 66±15 years) were reimbursed for at least one colchicine-based drug (Colchimax®, Colchicine Opocalcium®), representing nearly 205,000 prescriptions. General practitioners were the main prescribers (93%). Among the prescriptions, 0.5% had absolute IC with colchicine: in 51% of cases with pristinamycin, followed by azithromycin (15.6%), clarithromycin (15.2%) and roxithromycin (11.9%). In the 15 days following the simultaneous prescription of colchicine and a contraindicated drug, 53 hospital stays were recorded. However, using only the primary diagnosis of hospitalization was not sufficiently relevant to conclude that there was no potential overdose of colchicine. Over the study period, the Thesaurus contained inconsistencies that confused clinicians: mention of absolute IC with colchicine in the "macrolide" and "pristinamycin" sections but not in the sections of 'potent CYP inhibitors' or macrolide class molecules. Overall, very few prescriptions included absolute IC with colchicine. Regular training and information of healthcare professionals remains essential to limit the risk of colchicine overdose and to remind them of the potentially fatal consequences.

[Evidence-based treatment recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever : A joint statement by the Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology and the German Society for Rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) in Germany is a rare, genetically linked disease of childhood and adolescence, which is characterized by recurrent febrile episodes and clinical signs of peritonitis, pleuritis and arthritis. Treatment with colchicine is effective and well-tolerated in the majority of patients; however, some patients do not sufficiently respond to this treatment or are intolerant to colchicine. For these patients first-line treatment with biologics which block interleukin-1 can be used.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to formulate evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with an insufficient response and intolerance to colchicine treatment.

METHODS

Based on a literature search and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on FMF from 2016 the appointed members of the Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (GKJR) and the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) convened to work out and form a consensus in a joint statement on evidence-based treatment recommendations on FMF.

RESULTS

After intensive discussions all decisions were in concordance. A total of 5 superordinate principles and 10 recommendations were agreed upon.

DISCUSSION

The joint activities of the GKJR and the DGRh were successfully concluded in a timely manner. The recommendations form a good basis for optimal treatment of all age groups of patients with FMF.