Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on FLAIR is not associated with early haemorrhagic transformation in the elderly

Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery in Neuroimaging: A Narrative Review on Clinical Applications and Technical Advances

While contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) has long been regarded as an adjunct sequence to evaluate leptomeningeal disease in addition to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, it is gradually being used for more diverse pathologies beyond leptomeningeal disease. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR is known to be highly sensitive to low concentrations of gadolinium within the fluid. Accordingly, recent research has suggested the potential utility of contrast-enhanced FLAIR in various kinds of disease, such as Meniere's disease, seizure, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and brain metastasis, in addition to being used for visualizing glymphatic dysfunction. However, its potential applications have been reported sporadically in an unorganized manner. Furthermore, the exact mechanism for its superior sensitivity to low concentrations of gadolinium has not been fully understood. Rapidly developing magnetic resonance technology and unoptimized parameters for FLAIR may challenge its accurate application in clinical practice. This review provides the fundamental mechanism of contrast-enhanced FLAIR, systematically describes its current and potential clinical application, and elaborates on technical considerations for its optimization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 5.

HARM revisited: Etiology of subarachnoid hyperintensities in brain FLAIR MRI

BACKGROUND

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) describes a phenomenon with a hyperintense signal in the subarachnoid space in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, presumably based on blood-brain barrier breakdown in acute stroke with reperfusion. However, this imaging phenomenon was described in other medical conditions.

AIM

Determination of the prevalence and associated clinical findings of this phenomenon in a large sample of patients with different neurological conditions.

METHODS

This is retrospective, single-center, observational study of 23,948 cerebral MRIs acquired in a Neurological University Clinic over 5 years. The prevalence of HARM, the underlying diagnosis, and damage pattern were examined by chart analysis; MRI was analyzed regarding the type of acute lesions, extent of microangiopathic lesions, and whether gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) was given.

RESULTS

Among the MRI data, 84 images (0.35%) from 61 patients were HARM-positive without a subarachnoid signal abnormality in any other sequence. Etiologies were heterogeneous; 35 patients had a cerebrovascular disease (CVD; 19 patients received recanalization therapy), 12 patients had an inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease and 14 patients had epilepsy. GBCA was applied to 64% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

HARM was a rare radiological finding in a range of different neurological pathologies, not limited to stroke, or to previous reperfusion therapy and was not dependent on previous GBCA administration. Our data suggest that the term is too narrow in terms of the concepts of the underlying pathology. We propose to use the term FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity ("FLASH") phenomenon which might better reflect the observation that the radiological sign can be associated with a variety of central neurological conditions without a straightforward association with therapy.

The Clinical Significance of the Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker Sign in Subacute Infarction Patients

Purpose: The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is characterized by the delayed enhancement of the subarachnoid or subpial space observed on postcontrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and is considered a cerebral reperfusion marker for various brain disorders, including infarction. In this study, we evaluated the cerebral distribution patterns of HARM for discriminating between an enhancing subacute infarction and an enhancing mass located in the cortex and subcortical white matter. Materials and methods: We analyzed consecutive patients who experienced a subacute ischemic stroke, were hospitalized, and underwent conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging including postcontrast FLAIR within 14 days from symptom onset, as well as those who had lesions corresponding to a clinical sign detected by diffusion-weighted imaging and postcontrast T1-weighted imaging between May 2019 and May 2021. A total of 199 patients were included in the study. Of them, 94 were finally included in the subacute infarction group. During the same period, 76 enhancing masses located in the cortex or subcortical white matter, which were subcategorized as metastasis, malignant glioma, and lymphoma, were analyzed. We analyzed the overall incidence of HARM in subacute ischemic stroke cases, and compared the enhancement patterns between cortical infarctions and cortical masses. Results: Among 94 patients with subacute stroke, 78 patients (83%) presented HARM, and among 76 patients with subcortical masses, 48 patients (63%) presented peripheral rim enhancement. Of 170 subcortical enhancing lesions, 88 (51.8%) showed HARM, and 78 (88.6%) were determined to be subacute infarction. Among 94 patients with subacute stroke, 48 patients (51%) had diffusion restrictions, and HARM was found in 39 patients (81.2%). Of the 46 patients (49%) without diffusion restriction, 39 patients (84.8%) showed HARM. Conclusions: The presence of HARM was significantly associated with subacute infarctions. For the masses, a peripheral rim enhancement pattern was observed around the mass rather than the cerebral sulci on postcontrast FLAIR.

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker associated with hemorrhagic transformation in the WAKE-UP trial

Introduction

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is an indicator of early disruption of the blood-brain-barrier. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of HARM in patients with a diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) - fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch and determine the association between this marker and hemorrhagic complications as well as clinical outcome.

Patients and Methods

We included patients from the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial who underwent baseline perfusion weighted imaging (PWI). HARM was defined as a hyperintense signal in the cerebrospinal fluid space on FLAIR imaging at 24 h after baseline imaging. We compared baseline characteristics in patients with and without HARM and investigated the association between HARM and any hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and parenchymal hematoma (PH) in a multivariate logistic regression. We also explored HARM as an independent predictor of poor outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 3-6 at 90 days.

Results

HARM was present in 14 of 223 (6%) patients with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch and baseline characteristics were similar in patients with vs without HARM. HARM showed an independent relationship with any HT (OR 6.67; 95%CI 1.72-26.58) and any PH (OR 6.92; 95%CI 1.34-29.49). The rate of HARM was similar in patients with good and poor outcome (5%, p = 0.90).

Conclusion

In the WAKE-UP trial, the incidence of HARM was only 6% at 24 h. An association was present between HARM and hemorrhagic complications, but no relationship with functional outcome was observed.

GLOS and HARM in patients with transient neurovascular symptoms with and without ischemic infarction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gadolinium leakage in ocular structures (GLOS) on fluid attenuated inversion recovery images (FLAIR) is a novel imaging marker in acute ischemic stroke and other neurological disorders.

METHODS

In patients with transient neurovascular symptoms who underwent repeated MRI with intravenous contrast agent administration, the presence of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) as well as the frequency and pattern of blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier impairment as demonstrated by the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) and GLOS respectively on postcontrast FLAIR were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall 28 patients with transient neurovascular symptoms (median age 70.5 years; 18 (64.3%) male) were included. Follow-up MRI was performed within 35 (IQR 21-47) hours after the initial MRI. On DWI, acute ischemic lesions were observed in 22 (78.6%). On contrast-enhanced FLAIR, GLOS was observed in 12 (42.9%) patients: in 1 (3.6%) only in the anterior chamber, and in 11 (39.3%) in the anterior chamber and vitreous body. HARM was observed in 3 (10.7%) patients. In one patient without ischemic lesion on DWI or HARM on FLAIR, GLOS was observed in the anterior chamber and vitreous body. Presence of GLOS was associated with higher age (p = 0.04) and detection of HARM (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with transient neurovascular symptoms, GLOS is a frequent finding and associated with HARM on contrast-enhanced FLAIR. As GLOS was observed in one patient without an ischemic lesion or HARM, it might be useful as an additional imaging marker.

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a complication of reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption is a crucial step toward HT; however, in clinical studies, there is still uncertainty about this relation. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence.

Methods: We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies from January 1990 to March 2020 about the relation between BBB disruption and HT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of BBB. The outcome of interest was HT at follow-up imaging evaluation (within 48 h from symptom onset). We pooled data from available univariate odds ratios (ORs) in random-effects models with DerSimonian–Laird weights and extracted cumulative ORs.

Results: We included 30 eligible studies (14 with CT and 16 with MR), N = 2,609 patients, with 88% and 70% of patients included in CT and MR studies treated with acute stroke therapy, respectively. The majority of studies were retrospective and had high or unclear risk of bias. BBB disruption was measured with consistent methodology in CT studies, whereas in MR studies, there was more variability. All CT studies provided a BBB disruption cutoff predictive of HT. Four CT and 10 MR studies were included in the quantitative analysis. We found that BBB disruption was associated with HT with both CT (OR = 3.42; 95%CI = 1.62–7.23) and MR (OR = 9.34; 95%CI = 3.16–27.59). There was a likely publication bias particularly for MR studies.

Conclusion: Our results confirm that BBB disruption is associated with HT in both CT and MR studies. Compared with MR, CT has been more uniformly applied in the literature and has resulted in more consistent results. However, more efforts are needed for harmonization of protocols and methodology for implementation of BBB disruption as a neuroradiological marker in clinical practice.

Pathophysiology of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Throughout the Different Stages of Ischemic Stroke and Its Implication on Hemorrhagic Transformation and Recovery

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a dynamic interface responsible for maintaining the central nervous system homeostasis. Its unique characteristics allow protecting the brain from unwanted compounds, but its impairment is involved in a vast number of pathological conditions. Disruption of the BBB and increase in its permeability are key in the development of several neurological diseases and have been extensively studied in stroke. Ischemic stroke is the most prevalent type of stroke and is characterized by a myriad of pathological events triggered by an arterial occlusion that can eventually lead to fatal outcomes such as hemorrhagic transformation (HT). BBB permeability seems to follow a multiphasic pattern throughout the different stroke stages that have been associated with distinct biological substrates. In the hyperacute stage, sudden hypoxia damages the BBB, leading to cytotoxic edema and increased permeability; in the acute stage, the neuroinflammatory response aggravates the BBB injury, leading to higher permeability and a consequent risk of HT that can be motivated by reperfusion therapy; in the subacute stage (1-3 weeks), repair mechanisms take place, especially neoangiogenesis. Immature vessels show leaky BBB, but this permeability has been associated with improved clinical recovery. In the chronic stage (>6 weeks), an increase of BBB restoration factors leads the barrier to start decreasing its permeability. Nonetheless, permeability will persist to some degree several weeks after injury. Understanding the mechanisms behind BBB dysregulation and HT pathophysiology could potentially help guide acute stroke care decisions and the development of new therapeutic targets; however, effective translation into clinical practice is still lacking. In this review, we will address the different pathological and physiological repair mechanisms involved in BBB permeability through the different stages of ischemic stroke and their role in the development of HT and stroke recovery.

CSF enhancement on post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images; a systematic review

•

CSF enhancement on post-contrast FLAIR images is a novel marker for BBB leakage.

•

This neuroradiological marker is frequently observed in neurological diseases.

•

Post-contrast FLAIR CSF enhancement is associated with higher age and brain atrophy.

•

There is large methodological heterogeneity between studies that use this technique.

•

We provide recommendations for future methodological standardization.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) enhancement on T2-weighted post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (pcT2wFLAIR) images is a relatively unknown neuroradiological marker for gadolinium-based contrast agent extravasation due to blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption. We systematically reviewed human studies reporting on CSF enhancement on pcT2wFLAIR images to provide a comprehensive overview of prevalence of this new biomarker in healthy and diseased populations as well as its etiology and optimal detection methodology. We extracted information on the prevalence of CSF enhancement, its vascular risk factor and neuroimaging correlates, and methodological attributes of each study. Forty-four eligible studies were identified. By pooling data, we found that the prevalence of CSF enhancement was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80–89) in meningitis (4 studies, 65 patients), 73% (95%CI 62–81) in cases with (post-) acute intracerebral hemorrhage (2 studies, 77 cases), 64% (95% CI 54–73) in cases who underwent surgery for aneurysm treatment (2 studies, 99 patients), 40% (95% CI 30–51) in cases who underwent surgery for carotid artery disease treatment (3 studies, 76 patients), 27% (95% CI 25–30) in cases with acute ischemic stroke (9 studies, 1148 patients), 21% (95% CI 17–23) in multiple sclerosis (6 studies, 897 patients), and 13% (95% CI 7–21) in adult controls (4 studies, 112 cases). Presence of CSF enhancement was associated with higher age in eleven studies, with lobar cerebral microbleeds in one study, and with cerebral atrophy in four studies. PcT2wFLAIR imaging represents a promising method that can provide novel perspectives on BBB leakage into CSF compartments, with the potential to reveal important new insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of varying neurological diseases.

An MRI Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker Is Related to Elevated Peripheral Monocyte Count in Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute ischemic stroke as a hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is associated with upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Although activated leukocytes, including monocytes, are the main source of MMPs, limited data exist to support relationship between leukocyte activation and BBB disruption in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The goal of this study is to investigate the relationship between neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes with BBB disruption detected as HARM (+) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients who did not receive any reperfusion therapy with acute (<12 hours) ischemic stroke. MRI scans were obtained at baseline, 24 hours, and 5 days. HARM was evaluated on the 24-hour follow-up scan.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were studied. HARM was detected in 27% of patients. Median volumes of baseline perfusion (mean transit time [MTT]) deficit (219.4 mL vs. 158.4 mL, P = .029) and DWI infarct growth at 24 hours (18.50 mL vs. .14 mL, P = .017), as well as the median absolute numbers (1 × 103 /mm3 ) of monocytes, were significantly higher in HARM (+) versus HARM (-) patients (0.9 vs. 0.6, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Increased monocyte count associated with HARM supports importance of systemic inflammation in BBB disruption in acute ischemic stroke.

Role of Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker for Classifying the Stroke Etiology

Purpose

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is a delayed enhancement of the subarachnoid or subpial space observed on post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images and is associated with permeability changes to the blood–brain barrier in acute stroke. We investigated the relationship between HARM and stroke etiology based on the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between HARM and stroke locations with respect to vascular territories and anatomic compartments.

Materials and methods

We recruited 264 consecutive patients (109 women; mean age 68.63 years) who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including post-contrast FLAIR and DWI within 7 days of symptom onset from May 2015 to March 2016 for this retrospective study. Post-contrast FLAIR images were obtained 5 min after gadolinium administration. The mean time interval between the onset of stroke symptoms and MRI acquisition in total included patients was 18 h and 7 min (median 12 h and 57 min, range 2–127 h). We analyzed the overall incidence and distribution patterns of HARM in acute ischemic stroke cases and compared the relative incidence and distribution patterns of HARM between the subgroups of stroke etiology based on conventional TOAST classification. We obtained odds ratio (OR) of HARM in different stroke locations based on vascular territories and anatomical compartments. This study was approved by our institutional review board.

Results

Among the 264 patients, 67 (25.38%) patients were HARM positive and 197 (74.62%) patients were HARM negative. There was significant difference in HARM incidence among the stroke subgroups (p < 0.001). Small vessel occlusion (SVO) was associated with the HARM-negative group (p < 0.001), while large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolism (CE) were associated with the HARM-positive group (p = 0.001). Also, regional pattern of HARM on the same vascular territory as the acute infarction was dominantly demonstrated regardless of stroke etiology. The OR for HARM from middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction was 1.868 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.025–3.401]. The OR for HARM from cortical infarction was 9.475 (95% CI: 4.754–18.883) compared to other anatomic compartments.

Conclusion

The presence of the HARM was significantly associated with embolic infarctions including LAA and CE. Conversely, SVO was exclusively associated with the absence of the HARM. Second, MCA and cortical infarction showed a more pronounced HARM compared to infarctions at other vascular territories and anatomic compartments. According to the results in the current study, we speculate that the presence of HARM on post-contrast FLAIR images was associated with specific stroke causes especially in embolic causes.

Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation after experimental ischemic stroke using MRI-based algorithms

Estimation of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) risk is crucial for treatment decision-making after acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to determine the accuracy of multiparametric MRI-based predictive algorithms in calculating probability of HT after stroke. Spontaneously, hypertensive rats were subjected to embolic stroke and, after 3 h treated with tissue plasminogen activator (Group I: n = 6) or vehicle (Group II: n = 7). Brain MRI measurements of T₂, T₂*, diffusion, perfusion, and blood-brain barrier permeability were obtained at 2, 24, and 168 h post-stroke. Generalized linear model and random forest (RF) predictive algorithms were developed to calculate the probability of HT and infarction from acute MRI data. Validation against seven-day outcome on MRI and histology revealed that highest accuracy of hemorrhage prediction was achieved with a RF-based model that included spatial brain features (Group I: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.85 ± 0.14; Group II: AUC = 0.89 ± 0.09), with significant improvement over perfusion- or permeability-based thresholding methods. However, overlap between predicted and actual tissue outcome was significantly lower for hemorrhage prediction models (maximum Dice's Similarity Index (DSI) = 0.20 ± 0.06) than for infarct prediction models (maximum DSI = 0.81 ± 0.06). Multiparametric MRI-based predictive algorithms enable early identification of post-ischemic tissue at risk of HT and may contribute to improved treatment decision-making after acute ischemic stroke.

DCE-MRI blood–brain barrier assessment in acute ischemic stroke

Objective:

To quantitatively evaluate blood–brain barrier changes in ischemic stroke patients using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Methods:

We examined 54 stroke patients (clinicaltrials.govNCT00715533, NCT02077582) in a 3T MRI scanner within 48 hours after symptom onset. Twenty-eight patients had a follow-up examination on day 5–7. DCE T1 mapping and Patlak analysis were employed to assess BBB permeability changes.

Results:

Median stroke Ktrans values (0.7 × 10−3 min−1 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.4–1.8] × 10−3 min−1) were more than 3-fold higher compared to median mirror Ktrans values (0.2 × 10−3 min−1, IQR 0.1–0.7 × 10−3 min−1, p < 0.001) and further increased at follow-up (n = 28, 2.3 × 10−3 min−1, IQR 0.8–4.6 × 10−3 min−1, p < 0.001). By contrast, mirror Ktrans values decreased over time with a clear interaction of timepoint and stroke/mirror side (p < 0.001). Median stroke Ktrans values were 2.5 times lower than in hemorrhagic transformed regions (0.7 vs 1.8 × 10−3 min−1; p = 0.055). There was no association between stroke Ktrans values and the delay from symptom onset to baseline examination, age, and presence of hyperintense acute reperfusion marker.

Conclusion:

BBB in acute stroke patients can be successfully assessed quantitatively. The decrease of BBB permeability in unaffected regions at follow-up may be an indicator of global BBB leakage even in vessel territories remote from the index infarct.

Identification of Reversible Disruption of the Human Blood-Brain Barrier Following Acute Ischemia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Animal models of acute cerebral ischemia have demonstrated that diffuse blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption can be reversible after early reperfusion. However, irreversible, focal BBB disruption in humans is associated with hemorrhagic transformation in patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy. The goal of this study was to use a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker of BBB permeability to differentiate these 2 forms of BBB disruption.

METHODS

Acute stroke patients imaged with magnetic resonance imaging before, 2 hours after, and 24 hours after treatment with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator were included. The average BBB permeability of the acute ischemic region before and 2 hours after treatment was calculated using a T2* perfusion-weighted source images. Change in average permeability was compared with percent reperfusion using linear regression. Focal regions of maximal BBB permeability from the pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging were compared with the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma (PH) formation on the 24-hour magnetic resonance imaging scan using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Signals indicating reversible BBB permeability were detected in 18/36 patients. Change in average BBB permeability correlated inversely with percent reperfusion (P=0.006), indicating that early reperfusion is associated with decreased BBB permeability, whereas sustained ischemia is associated with increased BBB disruption. Focal regions of maximal BBB permeability were significantly associated with subsequent formation of PH (P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that diffuse, mild BBB disruption in the acutely ischemic human brain is reversible with reperfusion. This study also confirms prior findings that focal severe BBB disruption confers an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation in patients treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator.

Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker on FLAIR in Posterior Circulation Infarction

Purpose

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of blood brain barrier injury in posterior circulation infarction as demonstrated by the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) on fluid attenuated inversion recovery images (FLAIR).

Methods

From a MRI report database we identified patients with posterior circulation infarction who underwent MRI, including perfusion-weighted images (PWI), within 12 hours after onset and follow-up MRI within 24 hours and analyzed diffusion-weighted images (DWI), PWI, FLAIR, and MR angiography (MRA). On FLAIR images, the presence of HARM was noted by using pre-specified criteria (focal enhancement in the subarachnoid space and/or the ventricles).

Results

Overall 16 patients (median age of patients 68.5 (IQR 55.5–82.75) years) with posterior circulation infarction were included. Of these, 13 (81.3%) demonstrated PCA occlusion, and 3 (18.7%) patients BA occlusion on MRA. Initial DWI demonstrated ischemic lesions in the thalamus (68.8%), splenium (18.8%), hippocampus (75%), occipital lobe (81.3%), mesencephalon (18.8%), pons (18.8%), and cerebellum (50%). On follow-up MRA recanalization was noted in 10 (62.5%) patients. On follow-up FLAIR images, HARM was observed in 8 (50%) patients. In all of these, HARM was detected remote from the acute ischemic lesion. HARM was more frequently observed in patients with vessel recanalization (p = 0.04), minor infarction growth (p = 0.01), and smaller ischemic lesions on follow-up DWI (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

HARM is a frequent finding in posterior circulation infarction and associated with vessel recanalization, minor infarction growth as well as smaller infarction volumes in the course. Neuroradiologists should be cognizant of the fact that HARM may be present on short interval follow-up FLAIR images in patients with acute ischemic infarction who initially underwent MRI and received intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker on FLAIR in a Patient with Transient Ischemic Attack

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) has initially been described in acute ischemic stroke. The phenomenon is caused by blood-brain barrier disruption following acute reperfusion and consecutive delayed gadolinium enhancement in the subarachnoid space on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Here we report the case of an 80-year-old man who presented with transient paresis and sensory loss in the right arm. Initial routine stroke MRI including diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging demonstrated no acute pathology. Follow-up MRI after three hours demonstrated subarachnoid gadolinium enhancement in the left middle cerebral artery territory consistent with HARM that completely resolved on follow-up MRI three days later. This case illustrates that even in transient ischemic attack patients disturbances of the blood-brain barrier may be present which significantly exceed the extent of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. Inclusion of FLAIR images with delayed acquisition after intravenous contrast agent application in MRI stroke protocols might facilitate the diagnosis of a recent acute ischemic stroke.

Early Stage of Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker on Contrast-Enhanced FLAIR Images in Patients With Acute Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is defined as delayed CSF enhancement on FLAIR images in patients with acute stroke and was observed in follow-up FLAIR images after initial MRI with contrast material administration. We hypothesized that different imaging findings of HARM could be present depending on the timing of FLAIR imaging after contrast material administration.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Of 218 consecutive patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack over 3 months, 12 with linear contrast enhancement on the cortical surface in initial FLAIR images underwent serial FLAIR imaging. Initial FLAIR images were obtained 5 minutes after contrast material administration, and follow-up unenhanced FLAIR images were obtained 2.5-29 hours (mean, 13.2 hours) after initial FLAIR imaging. The enhancement patterns between initial and follow-up FLAIR images were compared.

RESULTS

In all 12 patients, initial contrast-enhanced FLAIR images showed focal or multifocal linear contrast enhancement along the cortical surface near acute infarctions. On follow-up unenhanced FLAIR images, initial cortical enhancement spread diffusely and filled the subarachnoid space.

CONCLUSION

HARM in acute stroke can be detected earlier than previously reported on initial contrast-enhanced FLAIR images. Different imaging findings of HARM depend on the timing of FLAIR imaging after contrast material administration.

Importance of Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Various Intracranial Pathologic Conditions

Intracranial lesions may show contrast enhancement through various mechanisms that are closely associated with the disease process. The preferred magnetic resonance sequence in contrast imaging is T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) at most institutions. However, lesion enhancement is occasionally inconspicuous on T1WI. Although fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences are commonly considered as T2-weighted imaging with dark cerebrospinal fluid, they also show mild T1-weighted contrast, which is responsible for the contrast enhancement. For several years, FLAIR imaging has been successfully incorporated as a routine sequence at our institution for contrast-enhanced (CE) brain imaging in detecting various intracranial diseases. In this pictorial essay, we describe and illustrate the diagnostic importance of CE-FLAIR imaging in various intracranial pathologic conditions.

Clinical Implications of Sulcal Enhancement on Postcontrast Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Images in Patients with Acute Stroke Symptoms

Objective

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) without diffusion abnormalities is occasionally found in patients with an acute stroke. This study was to determine the prevalence and clinical implications of HARM without diffusion abnormalities.

Materials and Methods

There was a retrospective review of magnetic resonance images 578 patients with acute strokes and identified those who did not have acute infarction lesions, as mapped by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). These patients were classified into an imaging-negative stroke and HARM without diffusion abnormalities groups, based on the DWI findings and postcontrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery images. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission, 1 day, and 7 days after the event, as well as clinical data and risk factors, were compared between the imaging-negative stroke and HARM without diffusion abnormalities groups.

Results

Seventy-seven acute stroke patients without any DWI abnormalities were found. There were 63 patients with an imaging-negative stroke (accounting for 10.9% of 578) and 13 patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities (accounting for 2.4% of 578). The NIHSS scores at admission were higher in HARM without diffusion abnormalities group than in the imaging-negative stroke group (median, 4.5 vs. 1.0; p < 0.001), but the scores at 7 days after the event were not significantly different between the two groups (median, 0 vs. 0; p = 1). The patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities were significantly older, compared with patients with an imaging-negative stroke (mean, 73.1 years vs. 55.9 years; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities are older and have similarly favorable short-term neurological outcomes, compared with the patients with imaging-negative stroke.

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker is associated with higher contrast agent dosage in acute ischaemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images is associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability changes. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of contrast agent dosage on HARM incidence in acute ischaemic stroke patients.

METHODS

We prospectively included 529 acute ischaemic stroke patients (204 females, median age 71 years). Patients underwent a first stroke-MRI within 24 hours from symptom onset and had a follow-up on day 2. The contrast agent Gadobutrol was administered to the patients for perfusion imaging or MR angiography. The total dosage was calculated as ml/kg body weight and ranged between 0.04 and 0.31 mmol/kg on the first examination. The incidence of HARM was evaluated on day 2 FLAIR images.

RESULTS

HARM was detected in 97 patients (18.3%). HARM incidence increased significantly with increasing dosages of Gadobutrol. Also, HARM positive patients were significantly older. HARM was not an independent predictor of worse clinical outcome, and we did not find an association with increase risk of haemorrhagic transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher dosage of Gadobutrol in acute stroke patients on initial MRI is associated with increased HARM incidence on follow-up. MRI studies on BBB should therefore standardize contrast agent dosages.

KEY POINTS

• Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on MRI indicates blood-brain barrier disruption. • This observational study on stroke patients characterizes HARM. • Incidence depends on contrast agent dosage on the previous day. • HARM is also associated with older age and poor kidney function. • Interpretation of HARM must take dosage into consideration.

Flat detector angio-CT following intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke: identification of hemorrhage and distinction from contrast accumulation due to blood-brain barrier disruption

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flat panel detector CT in the angiography suite may be valuable for the detection of intracranial hematomas; however, abnormal contrast enhancement frequently mimics hemorrhage. We aimed to assess the accuracy of flat panel detector CT in detecting/excluding intracranial bleeding after endovascular stroke therapy and whether it was able to reliably differentiate hemorrhage from early blood-brain barrier disruption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients were included for retrospective evaluation following endovascular stroke therapy: 32 after stent-assisted thrombectomy, 14 after intra-arterial thrombolysis, and 27 after a combination of both. Flat panel CT images were assessed for image quality and the presence and type of intracranial hemorrhage and BBB disruption by 2 readers separately and in consensus. Follow-up by multisection head CT, serving as the reference standard, was evaluated by a single reader.

RESULTS

Conventional head CT revealed intracranial hematomas in 12 patients (8 subarachnoid hemorrhages, 7 cases of intracerebral bleeding, 3 SAHs plus intracerebral bleeding). Image quality of flat panel detector CT was considered sufficient in all cases supratentorially and in 92% in the posterior fossa. Regarding detection or exclusion of intracranial hemorrhage, flat panel detector CT reached a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 58%, 85%, 44%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. Maximum attenuation measurements were not valuable for the differentiation of hemorrhage and BBB disruption.

CONCLUSIONS

Flat panel CT after endovascular stroke treatment was able to exclude the rare event of an intracranial hemorrhage with a high negative predictive value. Future studies should evaluate the predictive value of BBB disruptions in flat panel detector CT for the development of relevant hematomas.

Early time course of FLAIR signal intensity differs between acute ischemic stroke patients with and without hyperintense acute reperfusion marker

BACKGROUND

In animal models of stroke, the time course of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruptions has been elaborately studied. In human patients, leakage of gadolinium into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, visualized on MRI fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, is considered a sign of BBB disruptions. It was termed 'hyperintense acute reperfusion marker' (HARM) and was associated with hemorrhages. However, the time course of the leakage is unknown and difficult to study in human patients. Also, the association of HARM with signal intensities and enhancement in the parenchyma on FLAIR images has not been thoroughly researched.

METHODS

We analyzed imaging data of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent repetitive MRI examinations within the first 36 h after the time of symptom onset. HARM was evaluated on FLAIR images. Regions of interest (ROI) of the hyperintensities on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were determined for each time point and mirrored to the contralateral side. The ROI were furthermore corrected for CSF-filled space, using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. The corrected ROI were used to determine mean signal intensities of the lesions relative to the contralateral side on FLAIR, ADC and B0 images for each time point.

RESULTS

The 18 included patients (5 females; median age: 69 years; median NIHSS score: 5) received 3-5 MRI examinations on the first day and 1-2 examinations on day 2 after stroke. Eight of the patients (44.4%) showed HARM on at least 1 examination. In 6 of these patients, HARM was already seen at the second examination, at the earliest 3.5 h after symptom onset. The HARM-positive patients had higher relative signal intensities (rSI) on FLAIR images in the parenchyma corresponding to the DWI-positive tissue compared with the HARM-negative patients. This difference between groups was statistically significant for the 2nd and 3rd examination (medians of 4.31 and 6.37 h from symptom onset, p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). No significant difference in rSI between groups was seen for ADC or B0 images.

CONCLUSION

HARM does not only represent a contrast medium leakage from the pial system into the CSF space. It is accompanied by a markedly increased rSI in the early ischemic lesion on FLAIR images, which is likely due to parenchymal enhancement. The lack of differences on B0 images excludes a pure T2 effect.

Blood-brain barrier disruption after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

CNS complications are often seen after heart surgery, and postsurgical disruption of the BBB may play an etiologic role. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of MR imaging-detected BBB disruption (HARM) and DWI lesions after cardiac surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients had an MRI after cardiac surgery. For half the patients (group 1), we administered gadolinium 24 hours after surgery and obtained high-resolution DWI and FLAIR images 24-48 hours later. We administered gadolinium to the other half (group 2) at the time of the postoperative scan, 2-4 days after surgery. Two stroke neurologists evaluated the images.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients we studied, none had clinical evidence of a stroke or delirium at the time of the gadolinium administration or the scan, but 9 patients (47%) had HARM (67% in group 1; 30% in group 2; P = .18) and 14 patients (74%) had DWI lesions (70% in group 1; 78% in group 2; P = 1.0). Not all patients with DWI lesions had HARM, and not all patients with HARM had DWI lesions (P = .56).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half the patients undergoing cardiac surgery have evidence of HARM, and three-quarters have acute lesions on DWI after surgery. BBB disruption is more prevalent in the first 24 hours after surgery. These findings suggest that MR imaging can be used as an imaging biomarker to assess therapies that may protect the BBB in patients undergoing heart surgery.

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging is caused by gadolinium in the cerebrospinal fluid

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI is believed to be caused by gadolinium-based contrast agents crossing a disrupted blood-brain barrier. However, this hypothesis has never been directly verified in humans.

METHODS

In this study, we analyzed cerebrospinal fluid samples of patients with HARM on imaging regarding the presence and concentration of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

RESULTS

Gadobutrol was found in concentrations of approximately 50 μmol/L. Using phantom MRI experiments, we demonstrate that the detected concentrations are consistent with the observed HARM imaging pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study yields first direct evidence in humans that the imaging phenomenon HARM is indeed caused by leakage of gadolinium-based contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid.