1
|
Schmidt R, Hamm CA, Rueger C, Xu H, He Y, Gottwald LA, Gebauer B, Savic LJ. Decision-Tree Models Indicative of Microvascular Invasion on MRI Predict Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Tumor Ablation. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:1279-1293. [PMID: 38974016 PMCID: PMC11227855 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s454487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Histological microvascular invasion (MVI) is a risk factor for poor survival and early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. Its prognostic value in the setting of locoregional therapies (LRT), where no tissue samples are obtained, remains unknown. This study aims to establish CT-derived indices indicative of MVI on liver MRI with superior soft tissue contrast and evaluate their association with patient survival after ablation via interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) versus iBT combined with prior conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Patients and Methods Ninety-five consecutive patients, who underwent ablation via iBT alone (n = 47) or combined with cTACE (n = 48), were retrospectively included between 01/2016 and 12/2017. All patients received contrast-enhanced MRI prior to LRT. Overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-progression (TTP) were assessed. Decision-tree models to determine Radiogenomic Venous Invasion (RVI) and Two-Trait Predictor of Venous Invasion (TTPVI) on baseline MRI were established, validated on an external test set (TCGA-LIHC), and applied in the study cohorts to investigate their prognostic value for patient survival. Statistics included Fisher's exact and t-test, Kaplan-Meier and cox-regression analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and Pearson's correlation. Results OS, PFS, and TTP were similar in both treatment groups. In the external dataset, RVI showed low sensitivity but relatively high specificity (AUC-ROC = 0.53), and TTPVI high sensitivity but only low specificity (AUC-ROC = 0.61) for histological MVI. In patients following iBT alone, positive RVI and TTPVI traits were associated with poorer OS (RVI: p < 0.01; TTPVI: p = 0.08), PFS (p = 0.04; p = 0.04), and TTP (p = 0.14; p = 0.03), respectively. However, when patients with combined cTACE and iBT were stratified by RVI or TTPVI, no differences in OS (p = 0.75; p = 0.55), PFS (p = 0.70; p = 0.43), or TTP (p = 0.33; p = 0.27) were observed. Conclusion The study underscores the role of non-invasive imaging biomarkers indicative of MVI to identify patients, who would potentially benefit from embolotherapy via cTACE prior to ablation rather than ablation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmidt
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
| | - Charlie Alexander Hamm
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Christopher Rueger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Han Xu
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Yubei He
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
| | | | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Auer TA, Anhamm M, Böning G, Fehrenbach U, Schöning W, Lurje G, Gebauer B, Collettini F. Effectiveness and safety of computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108429. [PMID: 38788357 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate HDR) brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2010 to January 2022, 38 patients (mean age, 70.1 years; SD ± 9.0 years) with 79 nodular and four diffuse intrahepatic HCC recurrences not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation underwent CT-guided HDR brachytheapy in our department. Tumor response was evaluated by cross-sectional imaging 6 weeks after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy and every 3 months thereafter. Local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves (KPCs). Severity of procedure-related complications (PRCs) was classified as recommended by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). RESULTS Patients were available for MRI evaluation for a mean follow-up of 33.1 months (SD, ±21.6 mm, range 4-86 months; median 29 months). Patients had a mean of 2.3 (SD, ±1.4) intrahepatic tumors. Mean tumor diameter was 43.2 mm (SD, ±19.6 mm). 13 of 38 (34.2%) patients showed local tumor progression after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy. Mean LTC was 29.3 months (SD, ±22.1). Distant tumor progression was seen in 12 patients (31.6%). The mean PFS was 20.8 months (SD, ±22.1). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 65.1%, 35.1% and 22.5%, respectively. 13 patients died during the follow-up period. Mean OS was 35.4 months (SD, ±21.7). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 91.5%, 77.4% and 58.0%, respectively. SIR grade 1 complications were recorded in 8.6% (5/38) and SIR grade 2 complications in 3.4% (2/58) of interventions. CONCLUSION CT-guided HDR brachytherapy is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for managing large or critically located HCC recurrences in the remaining liver after prior hepatic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Alexander Auer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Melina Anhamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Federico Collettini
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ümütlü MR, Öcal O, Puhr-Westerheide D, Fabritius MP, Wildgruber M, Deniz S, Corradini S, Rottler M, Walter F, Rogowski P, Seidensticker R, Philipp AB, Rössler D, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Efficacy and Safety of Local Liver Radioablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Lesions within and beyond Limits of Thermal Ablation. Dig Dis 2024; 42:461-472. [PMID: 38781948 DOI: 10.1159/000538788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) radiotherapy has been established in the treatment of liver tumors. With iBT, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions can be treated beyond the limits of thermal ablation (i.e., size and location). However, a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of iBT in patients within and beyond thermal ablation limits is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 146 patients with 216 HCC lesions have been analyzed retrospectively. Clinical and imaging follow-up data has been collected. Lesions were evaluated in terms of suitability for thermal ablation or not. The correlation between local tumor control (LTC), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and clinical and imaging parameters have been evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS LTC rates at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months were 87%, 75%, and 73%, respectively. 65% of lesions (n = 141) were not suitable for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The median TTP was 13 months, and the median OS was not reached (3-year OS rate: 70%). No significant difference in LTC, TTP, or OS regarding RFA suitability existed. However, in the overall multivariable analysis, lesion diameter >5 cm was significantly associated with lower LTC (HR: 3.65, CI [1.60-8.31], p = 0.002) and shorter TTP (HR: 2.08, CI [1.17-3.70], p = 0.013). Advanced BCLC stage, Child-Pugh Stage, and Hepatitis B were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION iBT offers excellent LTC rates and OS in local HCC treatment regardless of the limits of thermal ablation, suggesting further evidence of its alternative role to thermal ablation in patients with early-stage HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sinan Deniz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Auer TA, Müller L, Schulze D, Anhamm M, Bettinger D, Steinle V, Haubold J, Zopfs D, Pinto Dos Santos D, Eisenblätter M, Gebauer B, Kloeckner R, Collettini F. CT-guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 2024; 310:e232044. [PMID: 38319166 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Background CT-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (hereafter, HDR brachytherapy) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but studies comparing this therapy with other local-regional therapies are scarce. Purpose To compare patient outcomes of HDR brachytherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods This multi-institutional retrospective study included consecutive treatment-naive adult patients with unresectable HCC who underwent either HDR brachytherapy or TACE between January 2010 and December 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients matched for clinical and tumor characteristics by propensity score matching. Not all patients who underwent TACE had PFS available; thus, a different set of patients was used for PFS and OS analysis for this treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results After propensity matching, 150 patients who underwent HDR brachytherapy (median age, 71 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 117 males) and 150 patients who underwent TACE (OS analysis median age, 70 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 119 male; PFS analysis median age, 68 years [IQR: 63-76 years]; 119 male) were analyzed. Hazard of death was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 4.04; P < .001). Median estimated PFS was 32.8 months (95% CI: 12.5, 58.7) in the HDR brachytherapy group and 11.6 months (95% CI: 4.9, 22.7) in the TACE group. Hazard of disease progression was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 2.23; P < .001). Conclusion In selected treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC, treatment with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy led to improved OS and PFS compared with TACE. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chapiro in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo A Auer
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Lukas Müller
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Daniel Schulze
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Melina Anhamm
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Dominik Bettinger
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Verena Steinle
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Johannes Haubold
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - David Zopfs
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Michel Eisenblätter
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Federico Collettini
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thormann M, Heitmann F, Wrobel V, Heinze C, March C, Hass P, Damm R, Surov A, Pech M, Omari J. Interstitial Brachytherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival and Application of a Risk Stratification Model. Dig Dis 2023; 41:957-966. [PMID: 37385234 PMCID: PMC10716867 DOI: 10.1159/000531732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identification of prognostic factors is pivotal for patient selection and treatment efficacy. This study aimed to assess the impact of low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of iBT in patients with HCC. METHODS For this single-center study, we retrospectively identified 77 patients with HCC who underwent iBT between 2011 and 2018. Follow-up visits were recorded until 2020. The psoas muscle area, psoas muscle index, psoas muscle density (MD), and the skeletal muscle gauge were assessed on the L3 level on pre-treatment cross-sectional CT scans. RESULTS Median OS was 37 months. 42 patients (54.5%) had LSMM. An AFP level of >400 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 5.705, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.228-14.606, p = 0.001), BCLC stage (HR 3.230, 95% CI: 0.972-10.735, p = 0.026), and LSMM (HR 3.365, 95% CI: 1.490-7.596, p = 0.002) showed a relevant association with OS. Weighted hazard ratios were used to form a predictive risk stratification model with three groups: patients with low risk (median OS 62 months), intermediate risk (median OS 31 months), and high risk (median OS 9 months). The model showed a good prediction of 1-year mortality, with an AUC of 0.71. Higher MD was associated with better PFS (HR 0.920, 95% CI: 0.881-0.962, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing iBT for HCC, LSMM is associated with worse OS. A risk stratification model based on LSMM, AFP >400 ng/mL, and BCLC stage successfully predicted patient mortality. The model may support and enhance patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Thormann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Heitmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Vanessa Wrobel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christine March
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heinze C, Damm R, Othmer M, Thormann M, Surov A, Hass P, Seidesticker R, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Powerski M, Pech M, Omari J. Local tumor control of intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablative treatment with image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A subgroup analysis of 286 HCC nodules. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:231-241. [PMID: 36697267 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (iBT) has been demonstrated to offer high local tumor control rates (LTC) of >90% after local ablation of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; BCLC B and C). The purpose of this study was to show the efficacy of iBT stratified by subgroups and to identify clinical characteristics associated with superior local tumor control (LTC) based on a highly heterogenous patient population METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cumulative number of 286 HCC nodules in 107 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were conducted every 3 months after treatment. Analyzed clinical factors were: etiology, presence of liver cirrhosis, radiographic features, lesion size, pretreatment, administered dose, presence of portal hypertension, portal vein thrombosis, and level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). RESULTS LTC rate was 88.8% for a median follow-up of 14.3 months (range 3-81 months; 95% CI: 85-92%). Median minimal enclosing tumor dose (D100) was 16.1 Gy (range 7.1-30.3 Gy; reference dose 15 Gy). Subgroup analysis showed significant fewer local recurrences for alcoholic liver disease (ALD)-related HCCs compared to those related to other causes of liver cirrhosis (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, virus-related liver cirrhosis and other causes) (p = 0.015). LTC was significantly lower after prior surgical resection (p = 0.046). No significant variance was observed for the applied D100 in each group or for all other clinical factors tested. CONCLUSIONS IBT achieves high LTC rates across treated subgroups. However, further studies should particularly address the possible impact of underlying etiology on local recurrence with emphasis on a possible higher radiosensitivity of ALD-related HCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Heinze
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Othmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Thormann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luerken L, Haimerl M, Doppler M, Uller W, Beyer LP, Stroszczynski C, Einspieler I. Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1075-1086. [PMID: 35545102 DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-0954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common tumor worldwide. Because many hepatocellular carcinomas are already unresectable at the time of initial diagnosis, percutaneous tumor ablation has become established in recent decades as a curative therapeutic approach for very early (BCLC 0) and early (BCLC A) HCC. The aim of this paper is to provide a concise overview of the percutaneous local ablative procedures currently in use, based on their technical characteristics as well as clinical relevance, taking into account the current body of studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The literature search included all original papers, reviews, and meta-analyses available via MEDLINE and Pubmed on the respective percutaneous ablation procedures; the primary focus was on randomized controlled trials and publications from the last 10 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are well-established procedures that are considered equal to surgical resection in the treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCC with a diameter up to 3 cm due to their strong evidence in international and national guidelines. For tumors with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, the current S3 guidelines recommend a combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and thermal ablation using RFA or MWA as combination therapy is superior to thermal ablation alone in tumors of this size and shows comparable results to surgical resection in terms of overall survival. Alternative, less frequently employed thermal procedures include cryotherapy (CT) and laser ablation (LA). Non-thermal procedures include irreversible electroporation (IRE), interstitial brachytherapy (IBT), and most recently, electrochemotherapy (ECT). Due to insufficient evidence, these have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, the nonthermal methods are a reasonable alternative for ablation of tumors adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods. With advances in the technology of the respective procedures, increasingly good evidence, and advancements in supportive techniques such as navigation devices and fusion imaging, percutaneous ablation procedures may expand their indications for the treatment of larger and more advanced tumors in the coming years. KEY POINTS · RFA and MWA are considered equal to surgical resection as a first-line therapy for the curative treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCCs with a diameter of up to 3 cm.. · For HCCs with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, a combination of TACE and RFA or MWA is recommended. This combination therapy yields results comparable to those of surgical resection in terms of overall survival.. · Due to insufficient evidence, alternative ablation methods have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, nonthermal methods, such as IRE, IBT, and, most recently, ECT, are a reasonable alternative for ablation of HCCs adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods.. CITATION FORMAT · Luerken L, Haimerl M, Doppler M et al. Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-0954.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Luerken
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Haimerl
- Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Doppler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg Department of Radiology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wibke Uller
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg Department of Radiology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Philipp Beyer
- Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.,Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH, Potsdam, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Einspieler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
In Regard to Apisarnthanarax et al. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e239. [PMID: 35512991 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
10
|
Karagiannis E, Strouthos I, Leczynski A, Zamboglou N, Ferentinos K. Narrative Review of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy in Primary or Secondary Liver Tumors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:800920. [PMID: 35299745 PMCID: PMC8920984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.800920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal management of intrahepatic malignancies involves a multidisciplinary approach. Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative approach, the use of several minimally invasive ablative techniques has dramatically increased the last two decades, mainly due to the fact that they provide similar oncological results with significantly decreased morbidity. Among these modalities, interstitial liver brachytherapy, probably the most flexible liver ablative method, with excellent clinical data on its safety and effectiveness, is frequently not even mentioned as an option in the current peer reviewed literature and guidelines. Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy utilizing radionuclides that are directly inserted into the tumor. Compared to external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy has the potential to deliver an ablative radiation dose over a short period of time, with the advantage of a rapid dose fall-off, that allows for sparing of adjacent healthy tissue. For numerous malignancies such as skin, gynecological, breast, prostate, head and neck, bladder, liver and soft-tissue tumors, brachytherapy as a monotherapy or combined with external beam radiation therapy, has become a standard treatment for many decades. This review article aims to describe the high-dose-rate liver brachytherapy technique, its selection criteria, present its advantages and disadvantages, as well as the available clinical data, in order to help physicians to explore and hopefully introduce liver brachytherapy into their clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Agnes Leczynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Nikolaos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fleckenstein FN, Roesel MJ, Krajewska M, Auer TA, Collettini F, Maleitzke T, Böning G, Torsello GF, Fehrenbach U, Gebauer B. Combining Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) and CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT): A Retrospective Analysis of Advanced Primary and Secondary Liver Tumor Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010072. [PMID: 35008236 PMCID: PMC8750400 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Clinical management of advanced stages of primary and secondary liver tumors remains challenging. Combining different treatment approaches to create the most effective therapy for patients is, however, often necessary. With this study we aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of a combined intrahepatic treatment of transarterial radioembolization and CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. Our study showed that patients not responding to systemic chemotherapy or suffering from tumor relapse after surgical resection might benefit from a combined minimal-invasive treatment. Abstract Purpose: Treatment of patients with primary and secondary liver tumors remains challenging. This study analyzes the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) combined with CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) for the treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. Patients and Methods: A total of 77 patients (30 female) with various liver malignancies were treated. Primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and time to untreatable progression (TTUP). Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed in consideration of diagnosis and procedure sequence. Median OS and TTUP prediction were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 115 CT-HDRBT and 96 TARE procedures were performed with no significant complications recorded. Median OS and TTUP were 29.8 (95% CI 18.1–41.4) and 23.8 (95% CI 9.6–37.9) months. Median OS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-, cholangiocarcinoma carcinoma (CCA) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients was 29.8, 29.6 and 34.4 months. Patients starting with TARE had a median OS of 26.0 (95% CI 14.5–37.5) compared to 33.7 (95% CI 21.6–45.8) months for patients starting with CT-HDRBT. Hazard ratio of 1.094 per month was shown for patients starting with CT-HDRBT. Conclusion: Combining TARE and CT-HDRBT is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced stage primary and secondary liver tumors. Our data indicate that early TARE during the disease progression may have a positive effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Nima Fleckenstein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-657297
| | - Maximilian Julius Roesel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Maja Krajewska
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Timo Alexander Auer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Federico Collettini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Tazio Maleitzke
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Giovanni Federico Torsello
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu H, Schmidt R, Hamm CA, Schobert IT, He Y, Böning G, Jonczyk M, Hamm B, Gebauer B, Savic LJ. Comparison of intrahepatic progression patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases following CT-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211042304. [PMID: 34539817 PMCID: PMC8442486 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211042304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Given the metachronous and multifocal occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) and colorectal cancer metastases in the liver (CRLM), this study aimed
to compare intrahepatic progression patterns after computed tomography
(CT)-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy. Patients and methods: This retrospective analysis included 164 patients (114 HCC, 50 CRLM) treated
with brachytherapy between January 2016 and January 2018. Patients received
multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before, and about 8 weeks
after brachytherapy, then every 3 months for the first, and every 6 months
for the following years, until progression or death. MRI scans were assessed
for local or distant intrahepatic tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1
and electronic medical records were reviewed prior to therapy. The primary
endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, local and
distant intra-hepatic PFS were assessed to determine differences between the
intrahepatic progression patterns of HCC and CRLM. Secondary endpoints
included the identification of predictors of PFS, time to progression (TTP),
and overall survival (OS). Statistics included Kaplan–Meier analysis and
univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling. Results: PFS was longer in HCC [11.30 (1.33–35.37) months] than in CRLM patients [8.03
(0.73–19.80) months, p = 0.048], respectively.
Specifically, local recurrence occurred later in HCC [PFS: 36.83
(1.33–40.27) months] than CRLM patients [PFS: 12.43 (0.73–21.90) months,
p = 0.001]. In contrast, distant intrahepatic
progression occurred earlier in HCC [PFS: 13.50 (1.33–27.80) months] than in
CRLM patients [PFS: 19.80 (1.43–19.80) months, p = 0.456]
but without statistical significance. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed
tumor type and patient age as independent predictors for PFS. Conclusion: Brachytherapy proved to achieve better local tumor control and overall PFS in
patients with unresectable HCC as compared to those with CRLM. However,
distant progression preceded local recurrence in HCC. As a result, these
findings may help design disease-specific surveillance strategies and
personalized treatment planning that highlights the strengths of
brachytherapy. They may also help elucidate the potential benefits of
combinations with other loco-regional or systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Xu
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robin Schmidt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charlie Alexander Hamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabel Theresa Schobert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yubei He
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Jonczyk
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Duque AS, van Wagenberg T, Seidensticker M, Streitparth F, Walter F, Parodi K, Verhaegen F, Ricke J, Belka C, Paiva Fonseca G, Corradini S, Landry G. Validation of the collapsed cone algorithm for HDR liver brachytherapy against Monte Carlo simulations. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:936-947. [PMID: 34001415 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the collapsed cone (CC) algorithm against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for model-based dose calculations in high-dose-rate (HDR) liver brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Doses for liver brachytherapy treatment plans of 10 cases were retrospectively recalculated with a model-based approach using Monte Carlo n-Particle Code (MCNP) 6 (Dm,m-MC) and Oncentra Brachy ACE (Dm,m-ACE). Tissue segmentation consisted of assigning uniform compositions and mass densities to predefined Hounsfield Unit (HU) thresholds. Resulting doses were compared according to dose volume histogram parameters typical for clinical routine. These included the percentage liver volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy) or 10 Gy (V10Gy), the maximum dose to one cubic centimeter (D1cc) of organs at risk, the clinical target volume (CTV) fractions receiving 150% (V150), 100% (V100), 95% (V95) and 90% (V90) of the prescribed dose and the absolute doses to 95% (D95) and 90% (D90) of the CTV volumes. RESULTS Doses from Oncentra Brachy ACE agreed well with MC simulations. Differences were seen far from the source, in low-density regions and bone structures. Median percentage deviations were 1.1% for the liver V5Gy and 0.4% for the liver V10Gy, with deviations of largest magnitude amounting to 2.2% and 1.0%, respectively. Organs at risk had median deviations ranging from 0.3% to 1.5% for D1cc, with outliers ranging up to 4.6%. CTV volume parameter deviations ranged between -1.5% and 0.5%, dose parameter deviations ranged mostly between -2% and 1%, with two outliers at -4.0% and -3.4% for a small CTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sophie Duque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany
| | - Teun van Wagenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Streitparth
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel Paiva Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Iodine-125 seed implantation for residual hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocellular carcinoma in challenging locations after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: Initial experience and findings. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:233-240. [PMID: 32695194 PMCID: PMC7366019 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.96863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation (ISI) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) lesions in challenging locations after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Material and methods A retrospective single-center review of 24 patients with HCC or CCC tumors in challenging locations (hepatic dome or close to the heart/diaphragm/hepatic hilum) was conducted. Patients who underwent CT-guided 125I implantation from May 2014 to January 2019 were recruited. Patients’ demographics and details including technical success, treatment response, patient survival, and complication rate were also evaluated. Results Treated tumors were located in the hepatic dome (n = 10; 41.7%), subcapsularly (n = 6; 25%), close to the heart (n = 3; 12.5%), and in the liver hilum (n = 5; 20.8%). The mean maximum diameter of tumors in challenging locations was 40.08 ±11.34 mm (range, 25-68 mm). TACE (2 ±1, 1-4 times) was applied before ISI. There were 27 ISI treatments administered (3 patients also received supplemental ISI). The total number of implanted seeds was 1,160, with mean 48 ±16 seed per patient (range, 30-90 seeds). The mean D90 value for ISI was 125 Gy. Technical success rate was 100%, while a complete response + partial response (CR + PR) was documented in 70.83%, 79.17%, 83.33%, and 79.17% of patients at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-ISI, respectively. There were no major complications, although 2 cases experienced 125I seed transfer to the diaphragm, and 1 case experienced transfer to the heart cavity. Conclusions CT-guided ISI for HCC or CCC lesions in challenging locations after TACE is both highly effective and safe.
Collapse
|
15
|
Song Z, Ye J, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang W. Computed tomography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther 2020; 15:1553-1560. [PMID: 31939437 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_629_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to retrospectively assess the outcome of interstitial iodine-125 brachytherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods Between February 2013 and March 2019, 57 patients with 108 unresectable HCC lesions treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 seed brachytherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included local tumor control and progression-free survival (PFS). Potential factors associated with OS were assessed. Results The mean follow-up duration was 24.3 ± 15.6 months (median, 20.5 months; range, 3.9-66.8 months). The median OS time was 23.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4-28.8 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial OS rates were 80.0%, 46.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. The median PFS time was 12 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.5 months). The 1- and 2-year actuarial PFS rates were 50% and 20.1%, respectively. Local progression was noted in 11 (11.3%) of 108 lesions with mean local control time of 20.5 ± 8.8 months. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 96.5% and 88.8%, respectively. Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage and Child-Pugh score were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.330 [95% CI, 0.128-0.853] and HR = 0.303 [95% CI, 0.151-0.610], respectively). Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm was found in 1 (1.8%) patient with lesion located in the porta hepatis. No other major complications developed during follow-up. Conclusion CT-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy may be an effective and safe alternative with promising survival and increased local control rate in unresectable HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaomin Song
- Department of Oncology, The Third Hospital of Qinhuangdao City, Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jiacheng Ye
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yongzheng Wang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yuliang Li
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wujie Wang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tumor Seeding along the Puncture Tract in CT-Guided Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:720-727. [PMID: 32127321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the occurrence of tumor seeding in computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and to identify potential risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS CT-HDRBT is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for local ablation of unresectable tumors. The procedure involves CT-guided placement of an enclosed catheter and high-dose-rate brachytherapy using iridium-192. Transcutaneous puncture of a tumor with subsequent retraction of the applicator has the potential risk of tumor seeding along the puncture tract. A total of 1,765 consecutive CT-HDRBT procedures were performed at this center between 2006 and 2017 and were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, a distinction was made between whether the puncture tract was irradiated or not. Follow-up imaging datasets were evaluated for tumor seeding along the former puncture tracts. Descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses of the data were performed. RESULTS Tumor seeding was observed in 25 cases (25 of 1,765 cases [1.5%]). A total of 0.008 cases occurred per person-age. Patient age was identified as a potential risk factor with an odds ratio of 1.046 (95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.091; P = .04). There were no differences between whether the puncture tract was irradiated or not (P = .552). CONCLUSIONS Tumor seeding along the puncture tract can occur in CT-HDRBT but is rare.
Collapse
|
17
|
Critical review of multidisciplinary non-surgical local interventional ablation techniques in primary or secondary liver malignancies. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:589-600. [PMID: 31969919 PMCID: PMC6964346 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.90466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Local non-surgical interventional percutaneous ablation represents nowadays an important part of the potential treatment strategies. Although surgical ablation represents the gold standard, in the past decade there was an expansion in the use of non-surgical ablative techniques: radiofrequency, microwave, laser, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation, and interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in primary as well as secondary liver cancers. With the growing experience in the field, there was implemented a new pillar for cancer treatment, together with surgery, chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy, so-called interventional oncology (IO). To date, there are no published papers regarding a comparative interdisciplinary evaluation of all these non-surgical interventional local ablation therapies. Our paper offers a critical interdisciplinary overview of the treatments in both primary and secondary liver tumors, including from a cost-effective point of view. Furthermore, the present status of education in IO and a comparison of actual economic aspects of the treatments are also provided.
Collapse
|
18
|
Complications of Computed Tomography-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and Risk Factors: Results from More than 10 Years of Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 43:284-294. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
19
|
Hass P, Mohnike K, Kropf S, Brunner TB, Walke M, Albers D, Petersen C, Damm R, Walter F, Ricke J, Powerski M, Corradini S. Comparative analysis between interstitial brachytherapy and stereotactic body irradiation for local ablation in liver malignancies. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:823-828. [PMID: 31522972 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) is an alternative treatment option to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the ablative treatment of liver malignancies. The aim of the present comparative planning study was to reveal the possibilities and limitations of both techniques with regard to dosimetric properties. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-five consecutive patients with liver malignancy diagnosis were treated with interstitial BT between 12/2008 and 09/2009. The prescription dose of BT varied between 15 and 20 Gy, depending on histology. For dosimetric comparison, virtual SBRT treatment plans were generated using the original BT planning CTs. Additional margins reflecting the respiratory tumor motion were added to the target volumes for SBRT planning. RESULTS The mean PTVBT was 34.7 cm3 (0.5-410.0 cm3) vs. a mean PTVSBRT of 73.2 cm3 (6.1-593.4 cm3). Regarding the minimum peripheral dose (D99.9), BT achieved the targeted prescription dose of 15 Gy/20 Gy better without violating organ at risk constraints. The dose exposure of the liver was significantly influenced by treatment modality. The liver exposure to 5 Gy was statistically lower with 611 ± 43 cm3 for BT as compared with 694 ± 37 cm3 for SBRT plans (20-Gy group, p = 0.001), corresponding to 41.8% vs. 45.9% liver volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the comparison of clinically treated liver BT treatments with virtually planned SBRT treatments. The planning study showed a superior outcome of BT regarding dose coverage of the target volume and exposed liver volume. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine ideal applicability for each treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- Diagnostisch Therapeutisches Zentrum (DTZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Siegfried Kropf
- Institute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Walke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Albers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sun XL, Jiang X, Kuang Y, Xing L, Bu LY, Yuan SH, Yu JM, Zheng SS. Potential of Gd-EOB-DTPA as an imaging biomarker for liver injury estimation after radiation therapy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019; 18:354-359. [PMID: 31221569 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic radiation injury severely restricts irradiation treatment for liver carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical application of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in the assessment of liver function after external radiation therapy and to determine the relationship between focal liver reaction (FLR) and liver function. METHODS A total of 47 patients with liver malignancies who underwent external beam radiation therapy were enrolled. EOB-MRI was performed on each patient at approximately one month post-radiotherapy. The hepatobiliary (HPB) phase images from EOB-MRI were fused with the planning CT images, and the isodose lines from the patients' treatment plans were overlaid onto the fused images. The correlation of the EOB-MR image intensity distribution with the isodose lines was studied. We also compared liver function in patients between pre-treatment and post-treatment. RESULTS Decreased uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA, which was manifested by well-demarcated focal hypointensity of the liver parenchyma or FLR to high-dose radiation, was observed in the irradiated areas of 38 patients. The radiotherapy isodose line of decreased uptake area of Gd-EOB-DTPA was 30-46 Gy. The median corresponding dose curve of FLR was 34.4 Gy. Nine patients showed the absence of decreased uptake area of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the irradiated areas. Compared to the 38 patients with the presence of decreased uptake area of Gd-EOB-DTPA, 9 patients with the absence of decreased uptake area of Gd-EOB-DTPA showed significant higher levels of total bile acid, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and alpha-fetoprotein (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase or albumin levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Visible uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by the liver parenchyma was significantly associated with liver function parameters. EOB-MRI can be a valuable imaging biomarker for the assessment of liver parenchyma function outside of radiation area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Li Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xue Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yu Kuang
- Medical Physics Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lu-Yi Bu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shuang-Hu Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - Jin-Ming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Damm R, Streitparth T, Hass P, Seidensticker M, Heinze C, Powerski M, Wendler JJ, Liehr UB, Mohnike K, Pech M, Ricke J. Prospective evaluation of CT-guided HDR brachytherapy as a local ablative treatment for renal masses: a single-arm pilot trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:982-990. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
22
|
Needle track seeding in hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation by high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a retrospective study of 588 catheter placements. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:516-521. [PMID: 30662474 PMCID: PMC6335555 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.80626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Needle track seeding in the local treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not yet evaluated for catheter-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), a novel local ablative technique. Material and methods We report a retrospective analysis of 100 patients treated on 233 HCC lesions by HDR-BT (using 588 catheters in total). No needle or catheter track irradiation was used. Minimum required follow-up with imaging was 6 months. In case of suspected needle track seeding (intra- and/or extrahepatic) in follow-up, image fusion of follow-up CT/MRI with 3D irradiation plan was used to verify the location of a new tumor deposit within the path of a brachytherapy catheter at the time of treatment. Results We identified 9 needle track metastases, corresponding to a catheter-based risk of 1.5% for any location of occurrence. A total of 7 metastases were located within the liver (catheter-based risk, 1.2%), and 2 metastases were located extrahepatic (catheter-based risk, 0.3%). Eight out of 9 needle track metastases were successfully treated by further HDR-BT. Conclusions The risk for needle track seeding after interstitial HDR-BT of HCC is comparable to previous reports of percutaneous biopsies and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially in case of extrahepatic needle track metastases. To compensate for the risk of seeding, a track irradiation technique similar to track ablation in RFA should be implemented in clinical routine.
Collapse
|
23
|
Radioablation by Image-Guided (HDR) Brachytherapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 42:239-249. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-2127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
24
|
Jonczyk M, Collettini F, Schnapauff D, Geisel D, Böning G, Feldhaus F, Wieners G, Hamm B, Gebauer B. Primary and metastatic malignancies of the lung: Retrospective analysis of the CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) ablation in tumours <4 cm and ≥4 cm. Eur J Radiol 2018; 108:230-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
25
|
Herrmann E, Terribilini D, Manser P, Fix MK, Toporek G, Candinas D, Weber S, Aebersold DM, Loessl K. Accuracy assessment of a potential clinical use of navigation-guided intra-operative liver metastasis brachytherapy-a planning study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:1030-1038. [PMID: 30022277 PMCID: PMC6208950 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1334-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
For patients with inoperable liver metastases, intra-operative liver high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is a promising technology enabling delivery of a high radiation dose to the tumor, while sparing healthy tissue. Liver brachytherapy has been described in the literature as safe and effective for the treatment of primary or secondary hepatic malignancies. It is preferred over other ablative techniques for lesions that are either larger than 4 cm or located in close proximity to large vessels or the common bile duct. In contrast to external beam radiation techniques, organ movements do not affect the size of the irradiated volume in intra-operative HDR-BT and new technical solutions exist to support image guidance for intra-operative HDR-BT. We have retrospectively analyzed anonymized CT datasets of 5 patients who underwent open liver surgery (resection and/or ablation) in order to test whether the accuracy of a new image-guidance method specifically adapted for intra-operative HDR-BT is high enough to use it in similar situations and whether patients could potentially benefit from navigation-guided intra-operative needle placement for liver HDR-BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Herrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - D Terribilini
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Toporek
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Candinas
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - K Loessl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gottumukkala S, Tumati V, Hrycushko B, Folkert M. Endoluminal and Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies: a Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:2. [PMID: 28110462 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0561-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral component in the multimodality management of many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at all stages of clinical presentation. With recent advances in technology and radiation delivery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be delivered with reduced toxicity. However, despite these advances, EBRT doses are still limited by the presence of radiosensitive serial structures near clinical targets in the GI tract. Relative to EBRT techniques, brachytherapy techniques have a lower integral dose and more rapid fall-off, allowing for high-dose delivery with little normal tissue exposure. Given the unique characteristics of brachytherapy, it is an attractive strategy to treat GI malignancies. This review addresses the application of both high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) to multiple GI malignancies for both definitive and palliative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vasu Tumati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim M, Kay CS, Jang WI, Kim MS, Lee DS, Jang HS. Prognostic value of tumor volume and radiation dose in moderate-sized hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter analysis in Korea (KROG 14-17). Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e7202. [PMID: 28614265 PMCID: PMC5478350 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000007202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of tumor volume and radiation dose for predicting treatment outcomes in moderate-sized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).A total of 72 patients with unresectable HCC ranging in size from 5 to 10 cm were treated with high-dose radiotherapy including hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), in 3 institutions from 2003 to 2013. The HRT doses ranged from 33 to 60 Gy in 3 to 10 fractions. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoints were overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and treatment toxicity.The median follow-up period after radiotherapy was 12.8 months. The local PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 57.0% and 39.0%, respectively, with a median of 13.6 months. The OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 70.1% and 45.2%, respectively, with a median of 21.1 months. A gross tumor volume (GTV) of 214 cm and a total dose of 105 Gy10 were identified as the optimal cutoff values of radiotherapeutic factors for local PFS. Patients with GTV ≤ 214 cm and total dose >105 Gy10 had significant higher 2-year local PFS and OS than patients with GTV >214 cm and total dose ≤ 105 Gy10 (P = .020 for local PFS, P = .009 for OS).The optimal cutoff values of GTV ≤ 214 cm and total dose >105 Gy10 may be useful for predicting survival outcomes when treating moderate-sized HCC with high-dose radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myungsoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
| | - Chul Seung Kay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science
| | - Dong Soo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Seok Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Koay EJ, Odisio BC, Javle M, Vauthey JN, Crane CH. Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017; 6:105-116. [PMID: 28503558 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma often causes death due to obstruction of the biliary system or interruption of the vascular supply of the liver. This fact emphasizes the critical need for local tumor control in this disease. Successful local tumor control has traditionally been achievable through surgical resection for the small proportion of patients with operable tumors. Technological advances in radiation oncology and in interventional radiology have enabled the delivery of ablative radiation doses or other cytotoxic therapies for tumors in the liver. In some cases, this has translated into substantial prolongation of life for patients with this disease, but the indications for these different treatment options are still the subject of ongoing debate. Here, we review the technological advances and clinical studies that are changing the way intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is managed, and discuss ways to achieve individualized treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of malignancies in various inner organs - technique, indications, and perspectives. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8:251-61. [PMID: 27504135 PMCID: PMC4965506 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last few years, minimally invasive tumor ablation performed by interventional radiologists has gained increasing relevance in oncologic patient care. Limitations of thermal ablation techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT), including large tumor size, cooling effects of adjacent vessels, and tumor location near thermosensitive structures, have led to the development of image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, especially for the treatment of liver malignancies. This article reviews technical properties of image-guided brachytherapy, indications and its current clinical role in multimodal cancer treatment. Furthermore, perspectives of this novel therapy option will be discussed.
Collapse
|
30
|
Patel S, Ragab O, Kamrava M. Another solution that enables ablative radiotherapy for large liver tumors: Percutaneous interstitial high-dose rate brachytherapy. Cancer 2016; 122:2766. [PMID: 27244104 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shyamal Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Omar Ragab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mohnike K, Wolf S, Damm R, Seidensticker M, Seidensticker R, Fischbach F, Peters N, Hass P, Gademann G, Pech M, Ricke J. Radioablation of liver malignancies with interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:288-96. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-0957-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
32
|
Schnapauff D, Collettini F, Steffen I, Wieners G, Hamm B, Gebauer B, Maurer MH. Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:26. [PMID: 26911437 PMCID: PMC4766654 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0606-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To analyse and compare the costs of hepatic tumor ablation with computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) as two alternative minimally invasive treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods An activity based process model was created determining working steps and required staff of CT-RFA and CT-HDRBT. Prorated costs of equipment use (purchase, depreciation, and maintenance), costs of staff, and expenditure for disposables were identified in a sample of 20 patients (10 treated by CT-RFA and 10 by CT-HDRBT) and compared. A sensitivity and break even analysis was performed to analyse the dependence of costs on the number of patients treated annually with both methods. Results Costs of CT-RFA were nearly stable with mean overall costs of approximately 1909 €, 1847 €, 1816 € and 1801 € per patient when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients annually, as the main factor influencing the costs of this procedure was the single-use RFA probe. Mean costs of CT-HDRBT decreased significantly per patient ablation with a rising number of patients treated annually, with prorated costs of 3442 €, 1962 €, 1222 € and 852 € when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients, due to low costs of single-use disposables compared to high annual fix-costs which proportionally decreased per patient with a higher number of patients treated annually. A break-even between both methods was reached when treating at least 55 patients annually. Conclusion Although CT-HDRBT is a more complex procedure with more staff involved, it can be performed at lower costs per patient from the perspective of the medical provider when treating more than 55 patients compared to CT-RFA, mainly due to lower costs for disposables and a decreasing percentage of fixed costs with an increasing number of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Schnapauff
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - F Collettini
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - I Steffen
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - G Wieners
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - B Hamm
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - B Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - M H Maurer
- Department of Radiology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstr. 10, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: preliminary outcomes and toxicity of a joint interventional radiology and radiation oncology technique for achieving local control in challenging cases. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2015; 7:327-35. [PMID: 26622237 PMCID: PMC4663208 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.54947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the ability of image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IG-HDR) to provide local control (LC) of lesions in non-traditional locations for patients with heavily pre-treated malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective series included 18 patients treated between 2012 and 2014 with IG-HDR, either in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 9) or as monotherapy (n = 9). Lesions were located in the pelvis (n = 5), extremity (n = 2), abdomen/retroperitoneum (n = 9), and head/neck (n = 2). All cases were performed in conjunction between interventional radiology and radiation oncology. Toxicity was graded based on CTCAE v4.0 and local failure was determined by RECIST criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for LC and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 11.9 months. Two patients had localized disease at presentation; the remainder had recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Seven patients had prior EBRT, with a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of 47.0 Gy. The median total EQD2s were 34 Gy and 60.9 Gy for patients treated with monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. Image-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy was delivered in one to six fractions. Six patients had local failures at a median interval of 5.27 months with a one-year LC rate of 59.3% and a one-year overall survival of 40.7%. Six patients died from their disease at a median interval of 6.85 months from the end of treatment. There were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities but two patients had serious long term toxicities. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate a good one year LC rate of nearly 60%, and a favorable toxicity profile when utilizing IG-HDR to deliver high doses of radiation with high precision into targets not readily accessible by other forms of local therapy. These preliminary results suggest that further studies utilizing this approach may be considered for patients with difficult to access lesions that require LC.
Collapse
|
34
|
Wieners G, Schippers AC, Collettini F, Schnapauff D, Hamm B, Wust P, Riess H, Gebauer B. CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the interdisciplinary treatment of patients with liver metastases of pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2015; 14:530-8. [PMID: 26459730 DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60409-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) is an interventional radiologic technique for local ablation of primary and secondary malignomas applying a radiation source through a brachycatheter percutaneously into the targeted lesion. The aim of this study was to assess local tumor control, safety and efficacy of CT-HDRBT in the treatment of liver metastases of pancreatic cancer. METHODS Twenty consecutive patients with 49 unresectable liver metastases of pancreatic cancer were included in this retrospective trial and treated with CT-HDRBT, applied as a single fraction high-dose irradiation (15-20 Gy) using a 192Ir-source. Primary endpoint was local tumor control and secondary endpoints were complications, progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS The mean tumor diameter was 29 mm (range 10-73). The mean irradiation time was 20 minutes (range 7-42). The mean coverage of the clinical target volume was 98% (range 88%-100%). The mean D100 was 18.1 Gy and the median D100 was 19.78 Gy. Three major complications occurred with post-interventional abscesses, three of which were seen in 15 patients with biliodigestive anastomosis (20%) and overall 15%. The mean follow-up time was 13.7 months (range 1.4-55.0). The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (range 1.4-42.9, mean 9.4). Local recurrence occurred in 5 (10%) of 49 metastases treated. The median overall survival after CT-HDRBT was 8.6 months (range 1.5-55.3). Eleven patients received chemotherapy after ablation with a median progression-free survival of 4.9 months (mean 12.9). Nine patients did not receive chemotherapy after intervention with a median progression-free survival of 3.2 months (mean 5.0). The rate of local tumor control was 91% in both groups after 12 months. CONCLUSION CT-HDRBT was safe and effective for the treatment of liver metastases of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gero Wieners
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hass P, Mohnike K. Extending the Frontiers Beyond Thermal Ablation by Radiofrequency Ablation: SBRT, Brachytherapy, SIRT (Radioembolization). VISZERALMEDIZIN 2015; 30:245-52. [PMID: 26288597 PMCID: PMC4513802 DOI: 10.1159/000366088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic spread of the primary is still defined as the systemic stage of disease in treatment guidelines for various solid tumors. This definition is the rationale for systemic therapy. Interestingly and despite the concept of systemic involvement, surgical resection as a local treatment has proven to yield long-term outcomes in a subset of patients with limited metastatic disease, supporting the concept of oligometastatic disease. Radiofrequency ablation has yielded favorable outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastases, and some studies indicate its prognostic potential in combined treatments with systemic therapies. However, some significant technical limitations apply, such as size limitation, heat sink effects, and unpredictable heat distribution to adjacent risk structures. Interventional and non-invasive radiotherapeutic techniques may overcome these limitations, expanding the options for oligometastatic patients and cytoreductive concepts. Current data suggest very high local control rates even in large tumors at any given location in the human body. The article focusses on the characteristics and possibilities of stereotactic body radiation therapy, interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and Yttrium-90 radioembolization. In this article, we discuss the differences of the technical preferences as well as their impact on indications. Current data is presented and discussed with a focus on application in oligometastatic or cytoreductive concepts in different tumor biologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hass
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg AÖR, Magdeburg, Germany ; International School of Image-Guided Interventions/Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- International School of Image-Guided Interventions/Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg AÖR, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pennington JD, Park SJ, Abgaryan N, Banerjee R, Lee PP, Loh C, Lee E, Demanes DJ, Kamrava M. Dosimetric comparison of brachyablation and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in the treatment of liver metastasis. Brachytherapy 2015; 14:537-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
37
|
Denecke T, Stelter L, Schnapauff D, Steffen I, Sinn B, Schott E, Seidensticker R, Puhl G, Gebauer B, Hänninen EL, Wust P, Neuhaus P, Seehofer D. CT-guided Interstitial Brachytherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma before Liver Transplantation: an Equivalent Alternative to Transarterial Chemoembolization? Eur Radiol 2015; 25:2608-16. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3660-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
38
|
CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 191:405-12. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0781-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
39
|
Computed-tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) ablation of metastases adjacent to the liver hilum. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:e509-14. [PMID: 23791521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2012] [Revised: 03/30/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate technical feasibility and clinical outcome of computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate-brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) ablation of metastases adjacent to the liver hilum. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between November 2007 and May 2012, 32 consecutive patients with 34 metastases adjacent to the liver hilum (common bile duct or hepatic bifurcation ≤5 mm distance) were treated with CT-HDRBT. Treatment was performed by CT-guided applicator placement and high-dose-rate brachytherapy with an iridium-192 source. MRI follow-up was performed 6 weeks and every 3 months post intervention. The primary endpoint was local tumor control (LTC); secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients were available for MRI evaluation for a mean follow-up time of 18.75 months (range: 3-56 months). Mean tumor diameter was 4.3 cm (range: 1.3-10.7 cm). One major complication was observed. Four (11.8%) local recurrences were observed after a local tumor control of 5, 8, 9 and 10 months, respectively. Twenty-two patients (68.75%) experienced a systemic tumor progression during the follow up period. Mean TTP was 12.9 months (range: 2-56 months). Nine patients died during the follow-up period. Median OS was 20.24 months. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive CT-HDRBT is a safe and effective option also for unresectable liver metastases adjacent to the liver hilum that would have been untreatable by thermal ablation.
Collapse
|
40
|
Collettini F, Schippers AC, Schnapauff D, Denecke T, Hamm B, Riess H, Wust P, Gebauer B. Percutaneous ablation of lymph node metastases using CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Br J Radiol 2013; 86:20130088. [PMID: 23659925 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the technical feasibility, safety and clinical outcome of CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) for achieving local tumour control (LTC) in isolated lymph node metastases. METHODS From January 2008 to December 2011, 10 patients (six males and four females) with isolated nodal metastases were treated with CT-HDRBT. Five lymph node metastases were para-aortic, three were at the liver hilum, one at the coeliac trunk and one was a left iliac nodal metastasis. The mean lesion diameter was 36.5 mm (range 12.0-67.0 mm). Patients were followed up by either contrast-enhanced CT or MRI 6 weeks and then every 3 months after the end of treatment. The primary end point was LTC. Secondary end points included primary technical effectiveness rate, adverse events and progression-free survival. RESULTS The first follow-up examination after 6 weeks revealed complete coverage of all nodal metastases treated. There was no peri-interventional mortality or major complications. The mean follow-up period was 13.2 months (range 4-20 months). 2 out of 10 patients (20%) showed local tumour progression 9 and 10 months after ablation. 5 out of 10 patients (50%) showed systemic tumour progression. The mean progression-free interval was 9.2 months (range 2-20 months). CONCLUSION CT-HDRBT is a safe and effective technique for minimally invasive ablation of nodal metastases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE CT-HDRBT of lymph node metastases is feasible and safe. CT-HDRBT might be a viable therapeutic alternative to obtain LTC in selected patients with isolated lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Collettini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Computed tomography-guided interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy for centrally located liver tumours: a single institution study. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:2264-70. [PMID: 23515917 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2816-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical outcome of computed tomography (CT)-guided interstitial (IRT) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) in the treatment of unresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies. This report updates and expands our previously described experience with this treatment technique. METHODS Forty-one patients with 50 tumours adjacent to the liver hilum and bile duct bifurcation were treated in 59 interventions of CT-guided IRT HDR BRT. The tumours were larger than 4 cm with a median volume of 84 cm(3) (38-1,348 cm(3)). The IRT HDR BRT delivered a median total physical dose of 20.0 Gy (7.0-32.0 Gy) in twice daily fractions of median 7.0 Gy (4.0-10.0 Gy) in 19 patients and in once daily fractions of median 8.0 Gy (7.0-14.0 Gy) in 22 patients. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the local control for metastatic hepatic tumours was 89 %, 73 % and 63 % at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. The local control for primary hepatic tumours was 90 %, 81 % and 50 % at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. Severe side effects occurred in 5.0 % of interventions with no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS CT-guided IRT HDR BRT is a promising procedure for the radiation treatment of centrally located liver malignancies. KEY POINTS • Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IRT HDR BRT) is a promising treatment for central liver tumours • CT-guided IRT HDR BRT is safe for treating extensive tumours • CT-guided IRT HDR BRT could play a role in managing unresectable hepatic malignancies.
Collapse
|
42
|
Treatment for liver metastasis from renal cell carcinoma with computed-tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT): a case series. World J Urol 2012; 31:1525-30. [PMID: 23132612 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0981-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2012] [Accepted: 10/24/2012] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcome of patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma who were treated with computed-tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT). METHODS Ten patients (7 men and 3 women; median age 72 ± 7.9 years) with a total number of 16 hepatic metastases from histologically proven renal cell carcinoma were treated with CT-HDRBT after discussing the case in an interdisciplinary tumor conference. All patients had underwent nephrectomy before CT-HDRBT. Three patients had extrahepatic manifestations (2 lung and 1 bone). Six patients had received immunotherapy or targeted therapy before CT-HDRBT. Follow-up included gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI two times within 6-8 weeks and after that every 3 months after treatment to evaluate treatment efficacy. RESULTS Mean follow-up time was 21.6 ± 13.7 months. One patient developed local and systemic (pulmonary and osseous) progression after 10.8 months which was treated with targeted therapy and died 20.3 months after CT-HDRBT. None of the remaining nine patients developed local progression or died during the follow-up period. Five patients developed systemic progression (3 pulmonary, 1 osseous and 1 locally at the site of nephrectomy) after an average of 19.7 ± 5.5 months. CONCLUSIONS CT-HDRBT is a viable alternative to hepatic resection of liver metastases from renal cell carcinoma in selected patients.
Collapse
|