Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumour variant unrecognized on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Beyond Adenocarcinoma - Anatomical Variations, Mimickers, and Post-Intervention Changes

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. However, its accuracy can be confounded by a spectrum of noncancerous entities with similar radiological features, posing a challenge for definitive diagnosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the MRI phenotypes of both common and rare benign prostate conditions that may be mistaken for malignancy. The narrative encompasses anatomical variants, other neoplastic processes, inflammatory conditions, and alterations secondary to medical interventions. Furthermore, this review underscores the critical role of MRI quality in diagnostic accuracy and explores the emerging contributions of artificial intelligence in enhancing image interpretation.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging features to differentiate adrenal pheochromocytoma from adrenal tumors with positive biochemical testing results

BACKGROUND

It is extremely essential to accurately differentiate pheochromocytoma from Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) before operation, especially biochemical tests were inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to differentiate pheochromocytomas among adrenal tumors, among which the consequences of biochemical screening tests of catecholamines and/or catecholamine metabolites are positive.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, this study retrospectively compared 35 pheochromocytoma (PHEO) patients with 27 non-pheochromocytoma(non-PHEO) patients between January 2022 to September 2023, among which the consequences of biochemical screening tests of catecholamines and/or catecholamine metabolites are positive. T test was used for the independent continuous data and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were applied to find the independent variate of the features to differentiate PHEO from non-PHEO and ROC analysis was applied to evaluate the diagnostic value of the independent variate.

RESULTS

We found that the T2-weighted (T2W) signal intensity in patients with pheochromocytoma was higher than other adrenal tumors, with greatly significant (p < 0.001). T2W signal intensity ratio (T2W nodule-to-muscle SI ratio) was an independent risk factor for the differential diagnosis of adrenal PHEOs from non-PHEOs. This feature alone had 91.4% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity to rule out pheochromocytoma based on optimal threshold, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC‑ROC) of 0.910(95% C I: 0.833-0.987).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that T2W signal intensity ratio can differentiate PHEO from non-PHEO, among which the consequences of biochemical screening tests of catecholamines and/or catecholamine metabolites are positive.

Histomic and transcriptomic features of MRI-visible and invisible clinically significant prostate cancers are associated with prognosis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to triage patients for prostate biopsy. However, 9% to 24% of clinically significant (cs) prostate cancers (PCas) are not visible in MRI. We aimed to identify histomic and transcriptomic determinants of MRI visibility and their association to metastasis, and PCa-specific death (PCSD). We studied 45 radical prostatectomy-treated patients with csPCa (grade group [GG]2-3), including 30 with MRI-visible and 15 with MRI-invisible lesions, and 18 men without PCa. First, histological composition was quantified. Next, transcriptomic profiling was performed using NanoString technology. MRI visibility-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and Reactome pathways were identified. MRI visibility was classified using publicly available genes in MSK-IMPACT and Decipher, Oncotype DX, and Prolaris. Finally, DEGs and clinical parameters were used to classify metastasis and PCSD in an external cohort, which included 76 patients with metastatic GG2-4 PCa, and 84 baseline-matched controls without progression. Luminal area was lower in MRI-visible than invisible lesions and low luminal area was associated with short metastasis-free and PCa-specific survival. We identified 67 DEGs, eight of which were associated with survival. Cell division, inflammation and transcriptional regulation pathways were upregulated in MRI-visible csPCas. Genes in Decipher, Oncotype DX and MSK-IMPACT performed well in classifying MRI visibility (AUC = 0.86-0.94). DEGs improved classification of metastasis (AUC = 0.69) and PCSD (AUC = 0.68) over clinical parameters. Our data reveals that MRI-visible csPCas harbor more aggressive histomic and transcriptomic features than MRI-invisible csPCas. Thus, targeted biopsy of visible lesions may be sufficient for risk stratification in patients with a positive MRI.

Clinical significance of prostate cancer identified by transperineal standard template biopsy in men with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). However, whether a negative mpMRI in patients with a clinical suspicion of CaP can omit a confirmatory biopsy remains less understood and without consensus. Transperineal (TP) standard template biopsy (SBx) provides an effective approach to CaP detection. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the CaP characteristics detected through TP SBx that are systematically overlooked by mpMRI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all men who underwent prebiopsy mpMRI and subsequent a 20-core TP SBx at our hospital from September 2019 to February 2021. Patients with suspicious mpMRI received a combined TP SBx and targeted biopsy (TBx) (suspicious group), while those without suspicious (negative) mpMRI and who proceeded to biopsy, received TP SBx only (nonsuspicious group). A negative mpMRI was defined as the absence of suspicious findings and/or the presence of low-risk areas with a PI-RADS score of ≤2. Subsequently, we compared and evaluated the clinical and biopsy characteristics between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

We identified 301 men in suspicious group and 215 men in nonsuspicious group. The overall CaP detection rate and csCaP detection rate by TP SBx were 74.1%, 38.9% for suspicious group and 43.3%, 14.9% for nonsuspicious group, respectively. csCaP NPV of mpMRI was 85.1% with a csCaP prevalence 28.9%. The greatest percentage of cancer involvement (GPC) in biopsy core from nonsuspicious group was significantly lower than those of suspicious group (40% vs. 50%, p = 0.005), In multivariate logistic analysis, only PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cc was identified as an independent and significant predictor of csCaP in nonsuspicious group.

CONCLUSION

Within our cohort, false-negative rates of mpMRI for csCaP are substantial, reaching 15%. Nonsuspicious cases may contain a large volume tumor since the high GPC of SBx. For cases with nonsuspicious imaging and higher PSAD, a confirmatory biopsy may be necessary due to the increased risk of missed csCaP by mpMRI.

Reliability of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 for excluding clinically significant prostate cancer using a 1.5 tesla scanner

INTRODUCTION

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate gland is now the recommended initial investigation of choice for the detection of Prostate cancer (PCa). It effectively identifies patients who require prostate biopsies due to the risk of clinically significant PCa. It helps patients with clinically insignificant PCa avoid the invasive biopsies and possible accompanying complications. Large clinical trials have investigated the accuracy of mpMRI in detecting PCa. We performed a local review to examine the reliability of omitting tissue sampling in men with a negative (PIRADS 2 (P2) or less) mpMRI in the primary diagnostic setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with clinical suspicion of PCa within a 2-year period. Patients had a mpMRI prior to having trans-perineal prostate gland biopsies. Clinically significant disease was defined as Gleason 7 and above. The descriptive data was analysed using contingency table methods. A p-value less than 0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

Out of 700 patients 90 had an mpMRI score of PIRADS 2. Seventy-seven (85.5%) of these patients had a negative biopsy, 9(10%) showed Gleason 6, 4 patients showed Gleason 7 or above. 78 patients with PIRADS 2 had a PSA density of < 0.15, none of which had a clinically significant biopsy result. The negative predictive value of mpMRI from this study is 95%.

CONCLUSION

Our results are in line with negative predictive values demonstrated in the current literature. This local study, likely applicable to other district general hospitals, shows that mpMRI is a safe and reliable initial investigation to aid decisions on which patients require biopsies.

Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy

Approaches and techniques used for diagnostic prostate biopsy have undergone considerable evolution over the past few decades: from the original finger-guided techniques to the latest MRI-directed strategies, from aspiration cytology to tissue core sampling, and from transrectal to transperineal approaches. In particular, increased adoption of transperineal biopsy approaches have led to reduced infectious complications and improved antibiotic stewardship. Furthermore, as image fusion has become integral, these novel techniques could be incorporated into prostate biopsy methods in the future, enabling 3D-ultrasonography fusion reconstruction, molecular targeting based on PET imaging and autonomous robotic-assisted biopsy.

The rising incidence of ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: Diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Ductal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate are associated with higher stage disease at radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes for patients undergoing RP with DA/IDC histology compared to pure acinar adenocarcinoma (AA) of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of men receiving RP between 2014 and 2021 revealing AA, DA, or IDC on final pathology was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients were included with 103 found to have DA/IDC. Patients with DA/IDC were older and had higher PSA, biopsy grade group (GG), RP GG, and other pathologic findings (extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pN stage) compared to AA patients (all P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher age, RP GG, and pT3a were associated with DA/IDC on RP (all P < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of biopsy compared to RP for diagnosis of DA/IDC was 29.1% (16.7% DA, 27.8% IDC) and 96.6% (99.3% DA, 96.6% IDC), respectively. In a subset of 281 men receiving MRI, PI-RADS distribution was similar for patients with DA/IDC vs. AA (90.7% vs. 80.7% with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, P = 0.23) with slightly higher biopsy sensitivity (41.9%). DA/IDC was associated with worse BCR (HR = 1.77, P = 0.02) but not biopsy DA/IDC (P = 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of prostate biopsy was low for detection of DA/IDC histology at RP. Patients with DA/IDC histology had unfavorable pathologic features at RP and worse BCR. Of patients with DA/IDC at RP, 90.7% were categorized as PI-RADS 4 to 5 on preoperative MRI.

Pure ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate protruding into the prostatic urethra: A case report of MRI findings and literature review

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DCa) is the histological variant of prostatic carcinoma. The macroscopic finding of DCa arising from primary duct by urethroscopy is papillary excrescences in the prostatic urethra. But the finding of MRI remains poorly understood, since there is no coherent report on the MRI finding of DCa arising from primary duct. We herein report a case of DCa arising from primary duct and forming papillary excrescences in the prostatic urethra. The patient was a male in his 70s and presented with gross hematuria a few days ago. Blood test showed elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA). Prostate MRI was performed. There were two lesions in the prostatic urethra and the right transition zone (TZ). On T₂-weighted image (T2WI), the lesion in the prostatic urethra was identifiable, but the lesion in the right TZ was difficult to identify. On diffusion-weighted image (DWI), both lesions showed hyperintense signal and could be identified, and there was continuity between them. Urethroscopy was performed, there was the lesion with papillary excrescences developing from the right dorsal side of prostatic urethra. Transurethral resection of the prostate was performed. The pathological diagnosis was DCa (pure type). A review of previous literature showed that DCa had a slightly hypointense signal on T2WI. It may be difficult to identify DCa in the TZ because DCa and the TZ show similar signals on T2WI. DWI may be useful to accurately assess DCa arising from primary duct.

Evaluation of the T2-weighted (T2W) adrenal MRI calculator to differentiate adrenal pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adrenal adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the T2-weighted (T2W) MRI calculator to differentiate adrenal pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adrenal adenoma.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive pheochromocytomas resected between 2010 and 2019 were compared to 23 consecutive lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. Three blinded radiologists (R1, R2, R3) subjectively evaluated T2W signal intensity and heterogeneity and extracted T2W signal intensity ratio (SIR) and entropy. These values were imputed into a quantitative and qualitative T2W adrenal MRI calculator (logistic regression model encompassing T2W SIR + entropy and subjective SI [relative to renal cortex] and heterogeneity) using a predefined threshold to differentiate metastases from adenoma and accuracy derived by a 2 × 2 table analysis.

RESULTS

Subjectively, pheochromocytomas were brighter (p < 0.001) and more heterogeneous (p < 0.001) for all three radiologists. Inter-observer agreement was fair-to-moderate for T2W signal intensity (K = 0.37-0.46) and fair for heterogeneity (K = 0.24-0.32). Pheochromocytoma had higher T2W-SI-ratio (p < 0.001) and entropy (p < 0.001) for all three readers. The quantitative calculator differentiated pheochromocytoma from adenoma with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (100% [95% confidence intervals 88-100%], 87% [66-97%], and 94% [86-100%] R1; 93% [77-99%], 96% [78-100%], and 94% [88-100%] R2; 97% [82-100%], 96% [78-100%], and 96% [91-100% R3]). The qualitative calculator was specific with lower sensitivity and overall accuracy (48% [29-68%], 100% [85-100%], and 74% [65-83%] R1; 45% [26-64%], 100% [85-100%], and 72% [63-82%] R2; 59% [39-77%], 100% [85-100%], and 79% [70-88% R3]).

CONCLUSIONS

T2W signal intensity and heterogeneity differ, subjectively and quantitatively, in pheochromocytoma compared to adenoma. Use of a quantitative T2W adrenal calculator which combines T2W signal intensity ratio and entropy was highly accurate to diagnose pheochromocytoma outperforming subjective analysis.

KEY POINTS

• Pheochromocytomas have higher T2-weighted signal intensity and are more heterogeneous compared to lipid-poor adrenal adenomas evaluated subjectively and quantitatively. • The quantitative T2-weighted adrenal MRI calculator, a logistic regression model combining T2-weighted signal intensity ratio and entropy, is highly accurate for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. • The qualitative T2-weighed adrenal MRI calculator had high specificity but lower sensitivity and overall accuracy compared to quantitative assessment and agreement was only fair-to-moderate.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinomas: a case series

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

From January 2009 to February 2020, seven patients who were diagnosed with pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma and had a referable preoperative MRI scan were included in the study. We evaluated the following MRI findings for each tumor: size, location, presence of multi-cystic component, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value.

RESULTS

The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 22 mm (range 19-70 mm). Regarding transverse distribution, five tumors were located in the periurethral area and two were located peripherally apart from the urethra. Two of the seven tumors had cystic components. The median ADC value of the tumors was 0.754 × 10^-3 mm²/s (range 0.570-0.963 × 10^-3 mm²/s). Based on the transverse distribution and components of the tumors on MRI, ductal adenocarcinomas were classified into three types: type I as a non-cystic tumor located peripherally apart from the urethra (29%, two cases); type II as a non-cystic tumor located in the periurethral area (43%, three cases); and type III as a tumor with a multi-cystic component (29%, two cases).

CONCLUSION

The non-cystic mass with periurethral distribution (type II) and multi-cystic mass (type III) may be characteristic features that differentiate pure ductal adenocarcinoma from ordinary acinar adenocarcinoma on MRI.

Defining Diagnostic Criteria for Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma at Multiparametric MRI

Background Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is an aggressive histologic variant of prostate cancer that often warrants multimodal therapy and poses a significant diagnostic challenge clinically and at imaging. Purpose To develop multiparametric MRI criteria to define DAC and to assess their diagnostic performance in differentiating DAC from prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC). Materials and Methods Men with histologically proven DAC who had multiparametric MRI before radical prostatectomy were retrospectively identified from January 2011 through November 2018. MRI features were predefined using a subset of nine DACs and then compared for men with peripheral-zone DACs 1 cm or greater in size and men with matched biopsy-confirmed International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 4-5 PAC, by four independent radiologists blinded to the pathologic diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was determined by consensus read. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared by using the Fisher test, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement (Cohen κ) and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results There were 59 men with DAC (median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 56, 67 years]) and 59 men with PAC (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 59, 69 years]). Predefined MRI features, including intermediate T2 signal, well-defined margin, lobulation, and hypointense rim, were detected in a higher proportion of DACs than PACs (76% [45 of 59] vs 5% [three of 59]; P < .001). On consensus reading, the presence of three or more features demonstrated 76% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 94% positive predictive value [PPV], and 80% negative predictive value [NPV] for all DACs and 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 81% PPV, and 100% NPV for pure DACs. The DACs and PACs showed no difference in contrast enhancement (100% vs 100%; P >.99, median T2 signal intensity (254 vs 230; P = .99), or apparent diffusion coefficient (median, 677 10^-6 mm²/sec vs 685 10^-6 mm²/sec; P = .73). Conclusion The presence of intermediate T2 signal, well-defined margin, lobulation, and/or hypointense rim, together with restricted diffusion and contrast enhancement at multiparametric MRI of the prostate, suggests prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma rather than prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

MRI Finding of Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Ductal adenocarcinoma is a variant of prostatic adenocarcinoma, originating from the epithelial lining of the primary and secondary ducts of the prostate. We report a 63-year-old male with prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma, presenting as urinary retention and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 11.71 ng/mL and biopsy-proven prostate cancer (Gleason score 3 + 3). MRI showed 2 hemorrhagic, multilocular cysts projecting into the bladder side from the prostatic inner gland and between the prostate and the right seminal vesicle. The prostate inner gland showed high signal intensity on the T2-weighted image and included tiny hyperintense spots on the fat-suppression T1-weighted image. In the part of the border of the hemorrhagic, multilocular cyst, a solid portion showing slight low intensity on T1-weigthed imaging and markedly restricted diffusion was observed, suggesting prostate cancer. He underwent total prostatectomy, and ductal adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 4 + 4) in the prostate inner gland and multilocular cysts was pathologically diagnosed. After the operation, his PSA level gradually increased, and MRI 8 months after the operation showed a vesical multilocular cyst, suggesting local recurrence. After he underwent radiation therapy and hormonal therapy, PSA level decreased, and no re-recurrence was observed during 8 years. We suggest its inclusion in the differential diagnosis of cases of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma's multiloculated cystic formation around the prostate and the bladder.

Differential diagnosis of uncommon prostate diseases: combining mpMRI and clinical information

The differential diagnosis of abnormalities in the prostate is broad, covering common (acinar adenocarcinoma, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic prostatitis, hemorrhage, cysts, calcifications, atrophy and fibrosis) and less common conditions (tumors other than acinar adenocarcinoma, granulomatous prostatitis containing tuberculosis, abscesses and other conditions, and idiopathic disorders such as amyloidosis and exophytic benign prostatic hyperplasia). Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate gland and imaging guidelines, such as the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1), have dramatically improved the ability to distinguish common abnormalities, especially the ability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Overlap can exist in the clinical history and imaging features associated with various common/uncommon prostate abnormalities, and biopsy is often required but is invasive. Prostate abnormalities can be divided into two categories: category 1, diseases for which PI-RADS scores are suitable for use, and category 2, diseases for which PI-RADS scores are unsuitable for use. Radiologists must have an intimate knowledge of other diseases, especially uncommon conditions. Past relevant history, symptoms, age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, MRI manifestations, and the applicability of the PI-RADS assessment should be considered when diagnosing prostate abnormalities.

Bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics for the identification of benign and malignant prostate lesions: cross-vendor validation

The purpose of this study was to develop Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BP-MRI) based radiomics models for differentiation between benign and malignant prostate lesions, and to cross-vendor validate the generalization ability of the models. The prebiopsy BP-MRI data (T2-Weighted Image [T2WI] and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient [ADC]) of 459 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were acquired using two scanners from different vendors. The prostate biopsies are the reference standard for diagnosing benign and malignant prostate lesions. The training set was 168 patients' data from Siemens (Vendor 1), and the inner test set was 70 patients' data from the same vendor. The external test set was 221 patients' data from GE (Vendor 2). The lesion Region of Interest (ROI) was manually delineated by experienced radiologists. A total of 851 radiomics features including shape, first-order statistical, texture, and wavelet features were extracted from ROI in T2WI and ADC, respectively. Two feature-ranking methods (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance [MRMR] and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test [WRST]) and three classifiers (Random Forest [RF], Support Vector Machine [SVM], and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator [LASSO] regression) were investigated for their efficacy in building single-parametric radiomics signatures. A biparametric radiomics model was built by combining the optimal single-parametric radiomics signatures. A comprehensive diagnosis model was built by combining the biparametric radiomics model with age and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) value using multivariable logistic regression. All models were built in the training set and independently validated in the inner and external test sets, and the performances of models in the diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions were quantified by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The mean AUCs of the inner and external test sets were calculated for each model. The non-inferiority test was used to test if the AUC of model in external test was not inferior to the AUC of model in inner test. Combining MRMR and LASSO produced the best-performing single-parametric radiomics signatures with the highest mean AUC of 0.673 for T2WI (inner test AUC = 0.729 vs. external test AUC = 0.616, p = 0.569) and the highest mean AUC of 0.810 for ADC (inner test AUC = 0.822 vs. external test AUC = 0.797, p = 0.102). The biparametric radiomics model produced a mean AUC of 0.833 (inner test AUC = 0.867 vs. external test AUC = 0.798, p = 0.051). The comprehensive diagnosis model had an improved mean AUC of 0.911 (inner test AUC = 0.935 vs. external test AUC = 0.886, p = 0.010). The comprehensive diagnosis model for differentiating benign from malignant prostate lesions was accurate and generalizable.

The visibility of prostate cancer concerning underlying histopathological variances: A single-center multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether prostate cancer (PCa) lesions regarding histopathological composition exhibit different morphological features on multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI).

METHODS

We investigated men with PCa with available mpMRI and whole-mount specimens between June 2015 to December 2020.The acquisition protocol consistent with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Two observers evaluated the images following the PI-RADS v2.1. guideline before biopsy and radical prostatectomy. The discrepancies were resolved in a joint meeting. A genitourinary pathologist reviewed the whole-digitalized mount specimens, and the lesions with Gleason score of 7 and above (3 + 4 and above), and/or cancers with a maximum diameter of 6 mm and more, and/or extraprostatic extension were accepted as clinically significant PCa. The PI-RADS scores and the diameter of the clinically significant PCa on mpMRI concerning histopathological components (i.e., cribriform component, intraductal pattern, or without cribriform component or intraductal pattern) were investigated. The clinically significant PCa foci with PI-RADS score <3 was accepted as an invisible lesion on mpMRI.

RESULTS

In all, 58 men with a total of 112 clinically significant PCa foci, were enrolled in the study. The intraductal pattern, cribriform pattern, or none of these patterns were observed in 28/112 (25 %), 43/112 (38.05 %), and 41/112 (36.60 %) tumor foci. Six out of 28 (21.42 %), 17/43 (39.53 %), and 18/41 (42.8 %) foci with an intraductal pattern, cribriform component, or without any of them, respectively, were invisible on mpMRI (P = 0.111).

CONCLUSION

Though it was not reached a statistical significance, clinically significant PCa with the cribriform component and without any intraductal or cribriform component are more likely to manifests mpMRI invisible foci than the intraductal pattern. Further multi-center studies are warranted to precisely elucidate mpMRI features of PCa regarding histopathological composition.

Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer

Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is the most common variant histological subtype of prostate carcinoma and has an aggressive clinical course. DAC is usually characterized and treated as high-risk prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC). However, DAC has a different biology to that of acinar disease, which often poses a challenge for both diagnosis and management. DAC can be difficult to identify using conventional diagnostic modalities such as serum PSA levels and multiparametric MRI, and the optimal management for localized DAC is unknown owing to the rarity of the disease. Following definitive therapy for localized disease with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, the majority of DACs recur with visceral metastases at low PSA levels. Various systemic therapies that have been shown to be effective in high-risk PAC have limited use in treating DAC. Although current understanding of the biology of DAC is limited, genomic analyses have provided insights into the pathology behind its aggressive behaviour and potential future therapeutic targets.

Utility of T2-weighted MRI to Differentiate Adrenal Metastases from Lipid-Poor Adrenal Adenomas

Purpose

To evaluate T2-weighted MRI features to differentiate adrenal metastases from lipid-poor adenomas.

Materials and Methods

With institutional review board approval, this study retrospectively compared 40 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) with metastases to 23 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 15) with lipid-poor adenomas at 1.5- and 3-T MRI between June 2016 and March 2019. A blinded radiologist measured T2-weighted signal intensity (SI) ratio (SI_nodule/SI_{psoas muscle}), T2-weighted histogram features, and chemical shift SI index. Two blinded radiologists (radiologist 1 and radiologist 2) assessed T2-weighted SI and T2-weighted heterogeneity using five-point Likert scales.

Results

Subjectively, T2-weighted SI (P < .001 for radiologist 1 and radiologist 2) and T2-weighted heterogeneity (P < .001, for radiologist 1 and radiologist 2) were higher in metastases compared with adenomas when assessed by both radiologists. Agreement between the radiologists was substantial for T2-weighted SI (Cohen κ = 0.67) and T2-weighted heterogeneity (κ = 0.62). Metastases had higher T2-weighted SI ratio than adenomas (3.6 ± 1.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.2, 8.2] vs 2.2 ± 1.0 [95% CI: 0.6, 4.3], P < .001) and higher T2-weighted entropy (6.6 ± 0.6 [95% CI: 4.9, 7.5] vs 5.0 ± 0.8 [95% CI: 3.5, 6.6], P < .001). At multivariate analysis, T2-weighted entropy was the best differentiating feature (P < .001). Chemical shift SI index did not differ between metastases and adenomas (P = .748). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for T2-weighted SI ratio and T2-weighted entropy were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.88) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.99). The logistic regression model combining T2-weighted SI ratio with T2-weighted entropy yielded AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.99) and did not differ compared with T2-weighted entropy alone (P = .268). There was no difference in logistic regression model accuracy comparing the data by either field strength, 1.5- or 3-T MRI (P > .05).

Conclusion

Logistic regression models combining T2-weighted SI and T2-weighted heterogeneity can differentiate metastases from lipid-poor adenomas. Validation of these preliminary results is required.Keywords: Adrenal, MR-Imaging, UrinarySupplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.

Histopathological features of prostate cancer conspicuity on multiparametric MRI: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has improved risk stratification for men with suspected prostate cancer. Indeed, mpMRI-visible tumours tend to be larger and of higher pathological grade than mpMRI-invisible tumours; however, concern remains around significant cancer that is undetected by mpMRI. There has been considerable recent interest to investigate whether tumour conspicuity on mpMRI is associated with additional histopathological features (including cellular density, microvessel density and unusual prostate cancer subtypes), which may have important clinical implications in both diagnosis and prognosis. Furthermore, analysis of these features may help reveal the radiobiology that underpins the actual mechanisms of mpMRI visibility (and invisibility) of prostate tumours. Here, we describe a protocol for a systematic review of the histopathological basis of prostate cancer conspicuity on mpMRI.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines will be used to guide screening, thematic reporting and conclusions drawn from all eligible studies. Included papers will be full-text, English-language articles, comparing the histopathological characteristics of mpMRI-visible lesions and mpMRI-invisible tumours. All studies published between January 1950 and January 2020 will be eligible for inclusion. Studies using confirmatory immunohistochemistry for the identification of immune subsets or structural components will be included. Study bias and quality will be assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. To ensure methodological rigour, this protocol is written in accordance with the PRISMA Protocol 2015 checklist. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted comparing histopathological feature frequency between mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible disease.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval will be required as this is an academic review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020176049.

What to expect from a non-suspicious prostate MRI? A review

BACKGROUND

Many guidelines now recommend multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) prior to an initial or repeat prostate biopsy. However, clinical decision making for men with a non-suspicious mpMRI (Likert or PIRADS score 1-2) varies.

OBJECTIVES

To review the most recent literature to answer three questions. (1) Should we consider systematic biopsy if mpMRI is not suspicious? (2) Are there additional predictive factors that can help decide which patient should have a biopsy? (3) Can the low visibility of some cancers be explained and what are the implications?

SOURCES

A narrative review was performed in Medline databases using two searches with the terms "MRI" and "prostate cancer" and ("diagnosis" or "biopsy") and ("non-suspicious" or "negative" or "invisible"); "prostate cancer MRI visible". References of the selected articles were screened for additional articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies published in the last 5 years in English language were assessed for eligibility and selected if data was available to answer one of the three study questions.

RESULTS

Considering clinically significant cancer as ISUP grade≥2, the negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in various settings and populations ranges from 76% to 99%, depending on cancer prevalence and the type of confirmatory reference test used. NPV is higher among patients with prior negative biopsy (88-96%), and lower for active surveillance patients (85-90%). The PSA density (PSAd) with a threshold of PSAd<0.15ng/ml/ml was the most studied and relevant predictive factor used in combination with mpMRI to rule out clinically significant cancer. Finally, mpMRI-invisible tumours appear to differ from a histopathological and genetic point of view, conferring clinical advantage to invisibility.

LIMITATIONS

Most published data come from expert centres and results may not be reproducible in all settings.

CONCLUSION

mpMRI has high diagnostic accuracy and in cases of negative mpMRI, PSA density can be used to determine which patient should have a biopsy. Growing knowledge of the mechanisms and genetics underlying MRI visibility will help develop more accurate risk calculators and biomarkers.

Conspicuity of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A cross-disciplinary translational hypothesis

Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed the risk stratification and diagnostic approach for suspected prostate cancer. The majority of clinically significant prostate cancers are visible on pre-biopsy mpMRI, however, there are a subset of significant tumors that are not detected by mpMRI. The radiobiological mechanisms underpinning mpMRI-visibility and invisibility of these cancers remain uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that mpMRI-visible tumors are enriched with molecular features associated with increased disease aggressivity and poor clinical prognosis, which is supported by short-term endpoints, such as biochemical recurrence following surgery. Furthermore, at the histopathological level, mpMRI-visible tumors appear to exhibit increased architectural and vascular density compared to mpMRI-invisible disease. It seems probable that the genomic, pathological, radiological, and clinical features of mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible prostate cancers are interrelated. Here, we propose a novel cross-disciplinary theory that links genomic and molecular evidence with cellular and histopathological appearances, elucidating both the mpMRI visibility and clinical status of significant prostate cancer.

Quantitative Prostate MRI

Prostate MRI is reported in clinical practice using the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS). PI-RADS aims to standardize, as much as possible, the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and ultimately the performance of prostate MRI. PI-RADS relies upon mainly subjective analysis of MR imaging findings, with very few incorporated quantitative features. The shortcomings of PI-RADS are mainly: low-to-moderate interobserver agreement and modest accuracy for detection of clinically significant tumors in the transition zone. The use of a more quantitative analysis of prostate MR imaging findings is therefore of interest. Quantitative MR imaging features including: tumor size and volume, tumor length of capsular contact, tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics, tumor T₁ and T₂ relaxation times, tumor shape, and texture analyses have all shown value for improving characterization of observations detected on prostate MRI and for differentiating between tumors by their pathological grade and stage. Quantitative analysis may therefore improve diagnostic accuracy for detection of cancer and could be a noninvasive means to predict patient prognosis and guide management. Since quantitative analysis of prostate MRI is less dependent on an individual users' assessment, it could also improve interobserver agreement. Semi- and fully automated analysis of quantitative (radiomic) MRI features using artificial neural networks represent the next step in quantitative prostate MRI and are now being actively studied. Validation, through high-quality multicenter studies assessing diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection, in the domain of quantitative prostate MRI is needed. This article reviews advances in quantitative prostate MRI, highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging techniques, as well as discussing opportunities and challenges for evaluation of prostate MRI in clinical practice when using quantitative assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort

BACKGROUND

All risk stratification strategies in cancer overlook a spectrum of disease. The Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS) provides a unique opportunity to explore cancers that are overlooked by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

OBJECTIVE

To summarise attributes of cancers that are systematically overlooked by mpMRI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

PROMIS tested performance of mpMRI and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy, using 5 mm template mapping (TPM) biopsy as the reference standard.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Outcomes were overall and maximum Gleason scores, maximum cancer core length (MCCL), and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Cancer attributes were compared between cancers that were overlooked and those that were detected.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of men with cancer, 7% (17/230; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-12%) had significant disease overlooked by mpMRI according to definition 1 (Gleason ≥ 4 + 3 of any length or MCCL ≥ 6 mm of any grade) and 13% (44/331; 95% CI 9.8-17%) according to definition 2 (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 of any length or MCCL ≥ 4 mm). In comparison, TRUS-guided biopsy overlooked 52% (119/230; 95% CI 45-58%) of significant disease by definition 1 and 40% (132/331; 95% CI 35-45%) by definition 2. Prostate cancers undetected by mpMRI had significantly lower overall and maximum Gleason scores (p = 0.0007; p < 0.0001) and shorter MCCL (median difference: 3 mm [5 vs 8 mm], p < 0.0001; 95% CI 1-3) than cancers that were detected. No tumours with overall Gleason score > 3 + 4 (Gleason Grade Groups 3-5; 95% CI 0-6.4%) or maximum Gleason score > 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Groups 4-5; 95% CI 0-8.0%) on TPM biopsy were undetected by mpMRI. Application of a PSAD threshold of 0.15 reduced the proportion of men with undetected cancer to 5% (12/230; 95% CI 2.7-8.9%) for definition 1 and 9% (30/331; 95% CI 6.2-13%) for definition 2. Application of a PSAD threshold of 0.10 reduced the proportion of men with undetected disease to 3% (6/230; 95% CI 1.0-5.6%) for definition 1 cancer and to 3% (11/331; 95% CI 1.7-5.9%) for definition 2 cancer. Limitations were post hoc analysis and uncertain significance of undetected lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a small proportion of cancers are overlooked by mpMRI, with estimates ranging from 4.4% (lower boundary of 95% CI for definition 1) to 17% (upper boundary of 95% CI for definition 2). Prostate cancers undetected by mpMRI are of lower grade and shorter length than cancers that are detected.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Prostate cancers that are undetected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are smaller and less aggressive than those that are detected, and none of the most aggressive cancers are overlooked by MRI.

Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance

OBJECTIVES

To review the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of Medline and Embase databases for relevant articles in the English language. Search terms included 'prostate cancer', 'active surveillance' or 'monitoring', 'expectant management', and 'MRI'. We also reviewed practice guidelines from recognized international associations or societies involved in prostate cancer care. Articles were selected by both authors for relevance to the subject matter.

RESULTS

The ability of mpMRI to visualize primarily high-grade tumours within the prostate may improve risk stratification for men considering AS for prostate cancer. Multiple mostly single-institution studies have found that the addition of mpMRI and a targeted biopsy strategy can improve AS patient selection over standard TRUS biopsy alone. The high negative predictive value of mpMRI may allow men to avoid early repeat biopsy and may offer the possibility to tailor biopsy strategies. The presence of a radiographically positive lesion on mpMRI at baseline is predictive of higher likelihood of radiographic progression over time while on AS.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has shown promise in both patient selection and monitoring for men who undergo AS for prostate cancer. There are multiple barriers to the widespread use of mpMRI for AS including quality, cost and access to care.

An MRI-based Radiomics Classifier for Preoperative Prediction of Ki-67 Status in Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the value of a magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics classifier for preoperatively predicting the Ki-67 status in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We chronologically divided 318 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed breast cancer into a training dataset (n = 200) and a validation dataset (n = 118). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1+C) images of breast cancer. Radiomics feature selection and radiomics classifiers were generated using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis method. The correlation between the radiomics classifiers and the Ki-67 status in patients with breast cancer was explored. The predictive performances of the radiomics classifiers for the Ki-67 status were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves in the training dataset and validated in the validation dataset.

RESULTS

Through the radiomics feature selection, 16 and 14 features based on T2W and T1+C images, respectively, were selected to constitute the radiomics classifiers. The radiomics classifier based on T2W images was significantly correlated with the Ki-67 status in both the training and the validation datasets (both P < .0001). The radiomics classifier based on T1+C images was significantly correlated with the Ki-67 status in the training dataset (P < .0001) but not in the validation dataset (P = .083). The T2W image-based radiomics classifier exhibited good discrimination for Ki-67 status, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.762 (95% confidence interval: 0.685, 0.838) and 0.740 (95% confidence interval: 0.645, 0.836) in the training and validation datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The T2W image-based radiomics classifier was a significant predictor of Ki-67 status in patients with breast cancer. Thus, it may serve as a noninvasive approach to facilitate the preoperative prediction of Ki-67 status in clinical practice.

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate whole-lesion quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the prediction of Gleason score (GS) upgrading in 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer diagnosed at systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy underwent 3-T MRI and radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2012 and 2014. A blinded radiologist contoured dominant tumors on ADC maps using histopathologic correlation. The whole-lesion mean ADC, ADC ratio (normalized to peripheral zone), ADC histogram, and texture analysis were compared between tumors with GS upgrading and those without GS upgrading using multivariate ROC analyses and logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Tumors were upgraded to GS 4 + 3 = 7 after RP in 26% (n = 14) of the 54 patients, and tumors were downgraded after RP in none of the patients. The mean ADC, ADC ratio, 10th-centile ADC, 25th-centile ADC, and 50th-centile ADC were similar between patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 tumors (0.99 ± 0.22, 0.58 ± 0.15, 0.77 ± 0.31, 0.94 ± 0.28, and 1.15 ± 0.24, respectively) and patients with upgraded GS 4 + 3 = 7 tumors (1.02 ± 0.18, 0.55 ± 0.11, 0.71 ± 0.26, 0.89 ± 0.20, and 1.11 ± 0.16) (p > 0.05). Regression models combining texture features improved the prediction of GS upgrading. The combination of kurtosis, entropy, and skewness yielded an AUC of 0.76 (SE = 0.07) (p < 0.001), a sensitivity of 71%, and a specificity of 73%. The combination of kurtosis, heterogeneity, entropy, and skewness yielded an AUC of 0.77 (SE = 0.07) (p < 0.001), a sensitivity of 71%, and a specificity of 78%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, whole-lesion mean ADC, ADC ratio, and ADC histogram analysis were not predictive of pathologic upgrading of GS 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer after RP. ADC texture analysis improved accuracy.

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An aggressive variant that is underdiagnosed and undersampled on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine if prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma is undersampled and/or underdiagnosed at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, we searched our pathology database between 2008 and 2014 for patients with a diagnosis of ≥10% ductal adenocarcinoma on radical prostatectomy and available TRUS-guided needle biopsy specimens. Three blinded genitourinary pathologists independently examined the biopsy slides. The presence or absence of ductal adenocarcinoma was determined. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using consensus diagnosis as the reference standard. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Based on consensus review, 66.7% (12/18) biopsy specimens demonstrated ductal adenocarcinoma and 33.3% (6/18) demonstrated conventional acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma. The sensitivity/specificity for each reader (R) was: 83/100% (R1), 100/83% (R2) and 58/83% (R3) and the inter-observer agreement was only fair (K=0.32). Only two of the original needle-biopsy reports correctly identified ductal adenocarcinoma (sensitivity = 17%). The main limitations of the study are the relatively small sample size and the potential for selection bias since we could only examine patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma may be undersampled at TRUS-guided biopsy and in this study was under-reported in routine clinical practice. This highlights the importance of increased awareness of ductal adeoncarcinoma and the need for clear diagnostic criteria. These findings have significant clinical impact especially when determining candidacy for active surveillance protocols.

False positive and false negative diagnoses of prostate cancer at multi-parametric prostate MRI in active surveillance

Abstract

MP-MRI is a critical component in active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) because of a high negative predictive value for clinically significant tumours. This review illustrates pitfalls of MP-MRI and how to recognise and avoid them. The anterior fibromuscular stroma and central zone are low signal on T2W-MRI/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), resembling PCa. Location, progressive enhancement and low signal on b ≥1000 mm²/s echo-planar images (EPI) are differentiating features. BPH can mimic PCa. Glandular BPH shows increased T2W/ADC signal, cystic change and progressive enhancement; however, stromal BPH resembles transition zone (TZ) PCa. A rounded morphology, low T2 signal capsule and posterior/superior location favour stromal BPH. Acute/chronic prostatitis mimics PCa at MP-MRI, with differentiation mainly on clinical grounds. Visual analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI must include EPI and appropriate windowing of ADC. Quantitative ADC analysis is limited by lack of standardization; the ADC ratio and ADC histogram analysis are alternatives to mean values. DCE lacks standardisation and has limited utility in the TZ, where T2W/DWI are favoured. Targeted TRUS-guided biopsies of MR-detected lesions are challenging. Lesions detected on MP-MRI may not be perfectly targeted with TRUS and this must be considered when faced with a suspicious lesion on MP-MRI and a negative targeted TRUS biopsy histopathological result.

Keypoints

• Multi-parametric MRI plays a critical role in prostate cancer active surveillance.

• Low T2W signal intensity structures appear dark on ADC, potentially simulating cancer.

• Stromal BPH mimics cancer at DWI and DCE.

• Long b value trace EPI should be reviewed

• Targeted biopsy of MR-detected lesions using TRUS guidance may be challenging.

Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI?

PURPOSE

To assesses the utility of a preparatory enema in the interpretation of prostate multiparametric (MP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under a waiver from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), 32 patients without bowel preparation and 28 patients who underwent a self-administered enema were imaged consecutively with 3T MP-MRI over 6 months. Two blinded radiologists independently assessed image quality on T2 -weighted (T2 W), trace b 1000 mm(2) /sec echo-planar (EPI) and apparent-diffusion coefficient (ADC) and assessed for motion/blur on T2 W and distortion/blur on EPI and ADC. Radiologists also quantified rectal stool and gas. A third blinded radiologist generated contrast curves from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data at six locations and measured the number of corrupted data points, defined as >10% aberrant signal intensity change. Subjective scores were compared using Wilcoxon sign rank test. Rectal contents were correlated to artifact using Spearman correlation. Contrast curves were evaluated with independent t-tests.

RESULTS

There was no difference in image quality on T2 W (P = 0.66-0.74), EPI (P = 0.13-0.36) or ADC (P = 0.49-0.59). There was less rectal stool in the enema group (P = 0.004) and amount of stool correlated with motion artifact on T2 W (r = 0.23, P = 0.02); however, there was no difference in motion artifact between groups (P = 0.47-0.94). Only a minority of patients in the non-enema group had moderate or large amounts of stool (16%) and none of these patients had severe or extensive artifact on T2 . There was less rectal gas in the enema group (P = 0.002); however, amount of gas did not correlate with distortion artifact on EPI or ADC (P = 0.17-0.41) and there was no difference in blur (P = 0.41-0.91) or distortion (P = 0.31-0.99) on EPI or ADC between groups. There was no difference in corrupted data points on DCE (P = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

In this study the use of a preparatory enema did not improve image quality or reduce artifact in prostate MP-MRI.

Multi-parametric (mp) MRI of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DCa) is an aggressive variant of conventional adenocarcinoma (CCa) with mixed DCa and CCa tumors comprising up to 5% of all prostate cancers. DCa may be underestimated on T2-weighted (T2W) MRI. This study assessed the mp-MRI appearance of DCa as compared with CCa.

METHODS

With research ethics board approval, we identified 38 patients who underwent mp-MRI (T2W, DWI, and DCE) and radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2012 and 2014. Eight DCa in 8 patients and 39 CCa tumor foci in 30 consecutive patients were identified. Tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC;10(-3) mm(2) /s), and time-signal intensity (SI) curves were calculated. Parametric data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and univariate regression. Time-SI curves were compared using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Tumor volumes were: 1.62(±1.02) for DCa, 1.03(±0.54) for Gleason 9, 0.88(±0.93) for Gleason 7/8, and 0.26(±0.14) mL for Gleason 6. There was no difference in size between DCa and Gleason 9 (P = 0.22); however, DCa were larger than Gleason 7/8 (P = 0.03) and Gleason 6 (P = 0.003) tumors. ADC values were: 0.789(±0.22) for DCa, 1.01(±0.19) for Gleason 9, 0.992(±0.23) for Gleason 7/8 and 1.389(±0.41) 10(-3) mm(2) /s for Gleason 6 tumors. There was no difference in ADC between DCa and Gleason 9 (P = 0.14) or Gleason 7/8 (P = 0.055) tumors. There was a difference in ADC for DCa and Gleason ≥7 CCa compared to Gleason 6 tumors, (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012). All DCa demonstrated type III time-SI curves. Gleason ≥ 7 tumors demonstrated type II/III curves. Gleason 6 tumors demonstrated Type I/II time-SI curves. There was no difference in curve type between groups, (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

Although DCa mimics Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 tumor at T2W MRI; DCa resembles Gleason ≥7 CCa on mp-MRI.