1
|
Sommer A, Weigel S, Hense HW, Gerß J, Weyer-Elberich V, Kerschke L, Nekolla E, Lenzen H, Heindel W. Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9. [PMID: 39012526 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The randomized TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) screening trial has shown that digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) is superior to digital mammography (DM) in invasive breast cancer detection varying with breast density. On the other hand, the overall average glandular dose (AGD) of DBT is higher than that of DM. Comparing the DBT + SM and DM trial arm, we analyzed here the mean AGD and their determinants per breast density category and related them to the respective invasive cancer detection rates (iCDR). METHODS TOSYMA screened 99,689 women aged 50 to 69 years. Compression force, resulting breast thickness, the calculated AGD obtained from each mammography device, and previously published iCDR were used for comparisons across breast density categories in the two trial arms. RESULTS There were 196,622 exposures of 49,227 women (DBT + SM) and 197,037 exposures of 49,132 women (DM) available for analyses. Mean breast thicknesses declined from breast density category A (fatty) to D (extremely dense) in both trial arms. However, while the mean AGD in the DBT + SM arm declined concomitantly from category A (2.41 mGy) to D (1.89 mGy), it remained almost unchanged in the DM arm (1.46 and 1.51 mGy, respectively). In relative terms, the AGD elevation in the DBT + SM arm (64.4% (A), by 44.5% (B), 27.8% (C), and 26.0% (D)) was lowest in dense breasts where, however, the highest iCDR were observed. CONCLUSION Women with dense breasts may specifically benefit from DBT + SM screening as high cancer detection is achieved with only moderate AGD elevations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT TOSYMA suggests a favorable constellation for screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) in dense breasts when weighing average glandular dose elevation against raised invasive breast cancer detection rates. There is potential for density-, i.e., risk-adapted population-wide breast cancer screening with DBT + SM. KEY POINTS Breast thickness declines with visually increasing density in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Average glandular doses of DBT decrease with increasing density; digital mammography shows lower and more constant values. With the smallest average glandular dose difference in dense breasts, DBT plus SM had the highest difference in invasive breast cancer detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Sommer
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Hense
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Gerß
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Laura Kerschke
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Elke Nekolla
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Department of Medical Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Horst Lenzen
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Walter Heindel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gennaro G, Povolo L, Del Genio S, Ciampani L, Fasoli C, Carlevaris P, Petrioli M, Masiero T, Maggetto F, Caumo F. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:4738-4749. [PMID: 38019313 PMCID: PMC11213762 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10457-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve breast radiographers' individual performance by using automated software to assess the correctness of breast positioning and compression in tomosynthesis screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective longitudinal analysis of prospective cohorts, six breast radiographers with varying experience in the field were asked to use automated software to improve their performance in breast compression and positioning. The software tool automatically analyzes craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views for their positioning quality by scoring them according to PGMI classifications (perfect, good, moderate, inadequate) and checking whether the compression pressure is within the target range. The positioning and compression data from the studies acquired before the start of the project were used as individual baselines, while the data obtained after the training were used to test whether conscious use of the software could help the radiographers improve their performance. The percentage of views rated perfect or good and the percentage of views in target compression were used as overall metrics to assess changes in performance. RESULTS Following the use of the software, all radiographers significantly increased the percentage of images rated as perfect or good in both CCs and MLOs. Individual improvements ranged from 7 to 14% for CC and 10 to 16% for MLO views. Moreover, most radiographers exhibited improved compression performance in CCs, with improvements up to 16%. CONCLUSION Active use of a software tool to automatically assess the correctness of breast compression and positioning in breast cancer screening can improve the performance of radiographers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study suggests that the use of a software tool for automatically evaluating correctness of breast compression and positioning in breast cancer screening can improve the performance of radiographers on these metrics, which may ultimately lead to improved screening outcomes. KEY POINTS • Proper breast positioning and compression are critical in breast cancer screening to ensure accurate diagnosis. • Active use of the software increased the quality of craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views acquired by all radiographers. • Improved performance of radiographers is expected to improve screening outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisella Gennaro
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| | - Letizia Povolo
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Sara Del Genio
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Lina Ciampani
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Fasoli
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Carlevaris
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Petrioli
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Tiziana Masiero
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Federico Maggetto
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesca Caumo
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sritharan N, Gutierrez C, Perez-Raya I, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Owens A, Dabydeen D, Medeiros L, Kandlikar S, Phatak P. Breast Cancer Screening Using Inverse Modeling of Surface Temperatures and Steady-State Thermal Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2264. [PMID: 38927969 PMCID: PMC11201981 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer is characterized by increased metabolic activity and vascularity, leading to temperature changes in cancerous tissues compared to normal cells. This study focused on patients with abnormal mammogram findings or a clinical suspicion of breast cancer, exclusively those confirmed by biopsy. Utilizing an ultra-high sensitivity thermal camera and prone patient positioning, we measured surface temperatures integrated with an inverse modeling technique based on heat transfer principles to predict malignant breast lesions. Involving 25 breast tumors, our technique accurately predicted all tumors, with maximum errors below 5 mm in size and less than 1 cm in tumor location. Predictive efficacy was unaffected by tumor size, location, or breast density, with no aberrant predictions in the contralateral normal breast. Infrared temperature profiles and inverse modeling using both techniques successfully predicted breast cancer, highlighting its potential in breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithya Sritharan
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY 14621, USA; (N.S.); (D.D.); (L.M.)
| | - Carlos Gutierrez
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; (C.G.); (I.P.-R.); (J.-L.G.-H.); (A.O.); (S.K.)
| | - Isaac Perez-Raya
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; (C.G.); (I.P.-R.); (J.-L.G.-H.); (A.O.); (S.K.)
- BiRed Imaging Inc., Rochester, NY 14609, USA
| | - Jose-Luis Gonzalez-Hernandez
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; (C.G.); (I.P.-R.); (J.-L.G.-H.); (A.O.); (S.K.)
| | - Alyssa Owens
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; (C.G.); (I.P.-R.); (J.-L.G.-H.); (A.O.); (S.K.)
| | - Donnette Dabydeen
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY 14621, USA; (N.S.); (D.D.); (L.M.)
| | - Lori Medeiros
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY 14621, USA; (N.S.); (D.D.); (L.M.)
| | - Satish Kandlikar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; (C.G.); (I.P.-R.); (J.-L.G.-H.); (A.O.); (S.K.)
- BiRed Imaging Inc., Rochester, NY 14609, USA
| | - Pradyumna Phatak
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY 14621, USA; (N.S.); (D.D.); (L.M.)
- BiRed Imaging Inc., Rochester, NY 14609, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen DL, Grimm LJ, Nelson JS, Johnson KS, Ghate SV. Screening the Implant-Augmented Breast with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Is Tomosynthesis Necessary for Non-implant-Displaced Views? JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:261-270. [PMID: 38703091 PMCID: PMC11129616 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine cancer visualization utility and radiation dose for non-implant-displaced (ID) views using standard protocol with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) vs alternative protocol with 2D only when screening women with implant augmentation. METHODS This retrospective cohort study identified women with implants who underwent screening DBT examinations that had abnormal findings from July 28, 2014, to December 31, 2021. Three fellowship-trained breast radiologists independently reviewed examinations retrospectively to determine if the initially identified abnormalities could be visualized on standard protocol (DBT with synthesized 2D (S2D) for ID and non-ID views) and alternate protocol (DBT with S2D for ID and only the S2D images for non-ID views). Estimated exam average glandular dose (AGD) and associations between cancer visualization with patient and implant characteristics for both protocols were evaluated. RESULTS The study included 195 patients (mean age 55 years ± 10) with 223 abnormal findings. Subsequent biopsy was performed for 86 abnormalities: 59 (69%) benign, 8 (9%) high risk, and 19 (22%) malignant. There was no significant difference in malignancy visualization rate between standard (19/223, 8.5%) and alternate (18/223, 8.1%) protocols (P = .92), but inclusion of the DBT for non-ID views found one additional malignancy. Total examination AGD using standard protocol (21.9 mGy ± 5.0) was significantly higher than it would be for estimated alternate protocol (12.6 mGy ± 5.0, P <.001). This remained true when stratified by breast thickness: 6.0-7.9 cm, 8.0-9.9 cm, >10.0 cm (all P <.001). CONCLUSION The inclusion of DBT for non-ID views did not significantly increase the cancer visualization rate but did significantly increase overall examination AGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek L Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCUSA
| | - Lars J Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCUSA
| | - Jeffrey S Nelson
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCUSA
| | - Karen S Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCUSA
| | - Sujata V Ghate
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gennaro G, Del Genio S, Manco G, Caumo F. Phantom-based analysis of variations in automatic exposure control across three mammography systems: implications for radiation dose and image quality in mammography, DBT, and CEM. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:49. [PMID: 38622388 PMCID: PMC11018565 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automatic exposure control (AEC) plays a crucial role in mammography by determining the exposure conditions needed to achieve specific image quality based on the absorption characteristics of compressed breasts. This study aimed to characterize the behavior of AEC for digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) acquisitions used in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for three mammography systems from two manufacturers. METHODS Using phantoms simulating various breast thicknesses, 363 studies were acquired using all available AEC modes 165 DM, 132 DBT, and 66 LE-CEM and HE-CEM. AEC behaviors were compared across systems and modalities to assess the impact of different technical components and manufacturers' strategies on the resulting mean glandular doses (MGDs) and image quality metrics such as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS For all systems and modalities, AEC increased MGD for increasing phantom thicknesses and decreased CNR. The median MGD values (interquartile ranges) were 1.135 mGy (0.772-1.668) for DM, 1.257 mGy (0.971-1.863) for DBT, 1.280 mGy (0.937-1.878) for LE-CEM, and 0.630 mGy (0.397-0.713) for HE-CEM. Medians CNRs were 14.2 (7.8-20.2) for DM, 4.91 (2.58-7.20) for a single projection in DBT, 11.9 (8.0-18.2) for LE-CEM, and 5.2 (3.6-9.2) for HE-CEM. AECs showed high repeatability, with variations lower than 5% for all modes in DM, DBT, and CEM. CONCLUSIONS The study revealed substantial differences in AEC behavior between systems, modalities, and AEC modes, influenced by technical components and manufacturers' strategies, with potential implications in radiation dose and image quality in clinical settings. RELEVANCE STATEMENT The study emphasized the central role of automatic exposure control in DM, DBT, and CEM acquisitions and the great variability in dose and image quality among manufacturers and between modalities. Caution is needed when generalizing conclusions about differences across mammography modalities. KEY POINTS • AEC plays a crucial role in DM, DBT, and CEM. • AEC determines the "optimal" exposure conditions needed to achieve specific image quality. • The study revealed substantial differences in AEC behavior, influenced by differences in technical components and strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisella Gennaro
- Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, Padua, 35128, Italy.
| | - Sara Del Genio
- Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, Padua, 35128, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Caumo
- Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, Padua, 35128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loveland J, Mackenzie A. Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:787-793. [PMID: 38291906 PMCID: PMC11027334 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the latest UK mammography dose survey results and to compare radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in UK breast screening. METHODS Anonymized exposure factors were collected for 111 152 screening cases and 5113 assessment cases from 405 x-ray sets across the United Kingdom using an online submission system linked to a national database of mammography quality control data. Output and beam quality measurements from each set were combined with exposure data to estimate mean glandular doses (MGD). RESULTS FFDM doses increased by ∼10% compared to the 2016-2019 national survey but compressed breast thicknesses (CBT) remained similar. DBT doses were 34%-40% higher than FFDM overall and 34% higher than FFDM for breasts 50-60 mm thick. We found a possible overestimation of PMMA breast equivalent thicknesses at low CBTs, but the evidence was not conclusive. CONCLUSION Recent changes to the mix of x-ray models in use in UK breast screening have resulted in higher FFDM breast doses. DBT doses in the NHSBSP are on average higher than FFDM by ∼34%-40%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first national study to report DBT and FFDM MGDs in UK breast screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Loveland
- National Coordinating Centre for the Physics in Mammography (NCCPM), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, 18 Frederick Sanger Road Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7YD, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair Mackenzie
- National Coordinating Centre for the Physics in Mammography (NCCPM), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, 18 Frederick Sanger Road Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7YD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miodownik D, Bierman D, Thornton C, Moo T, Feigin K, Damato A, Le T, Williamson M, Prasad K, Chu B, Dauer L, Saphier N, Zanzonico P, Morrow M, Bellamy M. Radioactive seed localization is a safe and effective tool for breast cancer surgery: an evaluation of over 25,000 cases. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2024; 44:011511. [PMID: 38295404 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad246a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Radioactive seed localization (RSL) provides a precise and efficient method for removing non-palpable breast lesions. It has proven to be a valuable addition to breast surgery, improving perioperative logistics and patient satisfaction. This retrospective review examines the lessons learned from a high-volume cancer center's RSL program after 10 years of practice and over 25 000 cases. We provide an updated model for assessing the patient's radiation dose from RSL seed implantation and demonstrate the safety of RSL to staff members. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of various aspects of presurgical evaluation, surgical techniques, post-surgical management, and regulatory compliance for a successful RSL program. Notably, the program has reduced radiation exposure for patients and medical staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Miodownik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - D Bierman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - C Thornton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - T Moo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - K Feigin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - A Damato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - T Le
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Williamson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - K Prasad
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - B Chu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - L Dauer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - N Saphier
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - P Zanzonico
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Morrow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Bellamy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahmed Shaker Hegian Z, Moh'd Abu Tahoun L, Ramli RM, Noor Azman NZ. The relationship between mean glandular dose and compressed breast thickness specified for Jordan. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 200:25-31. [PMID: 37738470 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
The mean glandular dose (MGD) is a measurement used in mammography to assess the amount of radiation absorbed. By considering specific exposure radiation dose criteria, MGD ensures minimal radiation while maintaining image quality for detecting abnormalities. The relationship between MGD and compressed breast thickness (CBT) is commonly utilized in mammographic dose surveys. This study aims to estimate the MGD-CBT relationship based on patient age in Jordan through retrospective analysis. The analysis involved 3465 screening mammography images of women aged 40-80, divided into three age groups: 40-49, 50-64 and 65-80 years. Each group had a specific CBT range (16.5-156 mm). The results indicate that MGD ranges from 1.6 to 1.7 mGy across all three age groups, independent of CBT. Thus, a significant and positive correlation exists between MGD and CBT in all age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Ahmed Shaker Hegian
- School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800 Minden, Malaysia
- Breast Imaging Unit, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), 11831 Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Endarko, Celina FM, Gani MRA. Analysis of dual-energy mammography subtraction technique for the dose and image quality evaluation using 3D-printed breast phantom. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1693-1701. [PMID: 37721685 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to quantitatively assess the radiation dose using XR-QA2 and the image quality of the dual-energy subtraction mammography technique on an in-house phantom. The analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of targets/filters on dose value and image quality using an in-house phantom made of PLA + as an object representing compressed breasts. All irradiation parameters were performed in the craniocaudal position with manual mode. Mean glandular dose (MGD) was recorded, followed by the calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and modulation transfer function (MTF) for image quality assessment parameters. The results showed that the image quality was accepted at dose levels within the IAEA and BAPETEN tolerance limit for 60 mm equivalent compressed breast using dual-energy mammography. Furthermore, the target/filter (W/Rh) reduced the dose by 1.03 mGy compared to the Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh with an enhancement in image quality. This indicated that the target/filter (W/Rh) combination was optimal due to the image quality improvement obtained with lower MGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endarko
- Laboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, East Java, Indonesia.
| | - Fitria M Celina
- Laboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, East Java, Indonesia
| | - M Roslan A Gani
- Department of Radiodiagnostic, "Dharmais" National Cancer Center Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Hora L, Neville N, Tuffy J, Craig A, O'Brien K, Sugrue K, McGarry M, Duggan B, Egan S. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry services in Ireland and comparing these with European diagnostic reference levels. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:9469-9478. [PMID: 37505250 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09992-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Ireland and compare these to existing European DRLs where available. This work surveyed all radiological facilities providing radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) services in Ireland. METHODS A list of common procedures and clinical tasks was established. A national database of service providers was used to identify the appropriate medical radiological facilities providing these services. These facilities were issued with an online survey. National DRLs were set as the 75th percentile of the distribution of median values obtained. A national median dose was also established. The broad categorisation of equipment type was also considered. Where differences between DRLs established using different detector types were deemed statistically significant, equipment-specific national DRLs were established. RESULTS National DRLs were established for 12 adult radiography projections. Equipment-specific (computed radiography and digital radiography) adult DRLs were established for four radiography projections. Paediatric DRLs were established for 11 radiography projections, including two based on clinical indications, for a range of paediatric weight categories. National DRLs were established for unilateral two-view mammography and breast tomosynthesis as well as for four DXA clinical indications and projections. All but one Irish DRL figure was found to be below or equal to European data. CONCLUSIONS This work provided a unique opportunity to establish national DRLs based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and DXA and compare these with European levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This work established national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The establishment of national DRLs is an essential component in the optimisation of patient radiation dose. KEY POINTS • Diagnostic reference levels are easily measured quantities intended for use as an aid to optimise patient dose and to identify when levels of patient dose are unusually high. • Data from all medical radiological facilities in Ireland was obtained to establish national diagnostic reference level (DRL) values and national median dose values in radiography, x-ray breast imaging and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and these were compared to existing European DRLs where available. • National DRL values were established for the first time in breast tomosynthesis, DXA scanning, and paediatric radiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee O'Hora
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Noelle Neville
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Tuffy
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Agnella Craig
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kirsten O'Brien
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kay Sugrue
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maeve McGarry
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brendan Duggan
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sean Egan
- The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bahadir H. Diagnostic value of digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic images in patients with breast cancer. Niger J Clin Pract 2023; 26:1444-1448. [PMID: 37929519 DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_532_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Different imaging techniques are used in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The low sensitivity of mammography to detect cancer in the dense breast parenchyma and the lack of standard application of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) are some of the problems. Therefore, breast cancer imaging techniques should be compared in terms of conspicuity and characterization of lesions. Aim Full-field digital mammography (DM) and synthetic mammography (SM) which are obtained from the slices of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) give similar results in terms of conspicuity and characterization of the lesions in detecting breast cancer. Patients and Methods In this retrospective study, 47 women diagnosed with breast cancer were included in the study. DM, SM, and DBT images were evaluated by scoring the conspicuity of the index lesion in the parenchyma and its characterization in terms of contour and shape with a 4-point scale. In addition, the conspicuity of the lesions in relation to lesion size and breast density was examined with these three techniques. Results There is no significant difference between DM and SM techniques for index lesion conspicuity and characterization; however, the imaging score of DBT is significantly higher than other techniques for the conspicuity and characterization of the lesions. In terms of the conspicuity of the lesions in relation to lesion size, DM and SM techniques show significant difference according to the size of the lesion, whereas the DBT technique did not show significant difference. While mammography type is a determinant of lesion conspicuity in only DM and SM techniques, conspicuity findings do not differ significantly in the DBT technique. Conclusion In conclusion, it was shown that standard images and SM images obtained from DBT did not differ significantly in terms of conspicuity and characterization of lesions. Thus, DBT is significantly superior to the DM and SM images. While the DM and SM images are more successful in showing large lesions and lesion detection in nondense breasts, DBT images were not affected by lesion size and breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Bahadir
- Department of Radiology, Private Practice, Bahçelievler/Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nguyen AA, McCarthy AM, Kontos D. Combining Molecular and Radiomic Features for Risk Assessment in Breast Cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci 2023; 6:299-311. [PMID: 37159874 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-092748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer risk is highly variable within the population and current research is leading the shift toward personalized medicine. By accurately assessing an individual woman's risk, we can reduce the risk of over/undertreatment by preventing unnecessary procedures or by elevating screening procedures. Breast density measured from conventional mammography has been established as one of the most dominant risk factors for breast cancer; however, it is currently limited by its ability to characterize more complex breast parenchymal patterns that have been shown to provide additional information to strengthen cancer risk models. Molecular factors ranging from high penetrance, or high likelihood that a mutation will show signs and symptoms of the disease, to combinations of gene mutations with low penetrance have shown promise for augmenting risk assessment. Although imaging biomarkers and molecular biomarkers have both individually demonstrated improved performance in risk assessment, few studies have evaluated them together. This review aims to highlight the current state of the art in breast cancer risk assessment using imaging and genetic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex A Nguyen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anne Marie McCarthy
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gerlach KE, Phalak KA, Cohen EO, Chang KN, Bassett R, Whitman GJ. Stepwise Implementation of 2D Synthesized Screening Mammography and Its Effect on Stereotactic Biopsy of Microcalcifications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2232. [PMID: 37443627 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Information evaluating the efficacy of 2D synthesized mammography (2Ds) reconstructions in microcalcification detection is limited. This study used stereotactic biopsy data for microcalcifications to evaluate the stepwise implementation of 2Ds in screening mammography. The study aim was to identify whether 2Ds + digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is non-inferior to 2D digital mammography (2DM) + 2Ds + DBT, 2DM + DBT, and 2DM in identifying microcalcifications undergoing further diagnostic imaging and stereotactic biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective stereotactic biopsy data were extracted following 151,736 screening mammograms of healthy women (average age, 56.3 years; range, 30-89 years), performed between 2012 and 2019. The stereotactic biopsy data were separated into 2DM, 2DM + DBT, 2DM + 2Ds + DBT, and 2Ds + DBT arms and examined using Fisher's exact test to compare the detection rates of all cancers, invasive cancers, DCIS, and ADH between modalities for patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy of microcalcifications. RESULTS No statistical significance in cancer detection was seen for 2Ds + DBT among those calcifications that underwent stereotactic biopsy when comparing the 2Ds + DBT to 2DM, 2DM + DBT, and 2DM + 2Ds + DBT imaging combinations. CONCLUSION These data suggest that 2Ds + DBT is non-inferior to 2DM + DBT in detecting microcalcifications that will undergo stereotactic biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Gerlach
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St. Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kanchan Ashok Phalak
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St. Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ethan O Cohen
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St. Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kiran N Chang
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Roland Bassett
- Biostatistics Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gary J Whitman
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler St. Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mota AM, Mendes J, Matela N. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Towards Dose Reduction through Image Quality Improvement. J Imaging 2023; 9:119. [PMID: 37367467 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9060119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer worldwide. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) has been widely accepted as a stand-alone modality to replace Digital Mammography, particularly in denser breasts. However, the image quality improvement provided by DBT is accompanied by an increase in the radiation dose for the patient. Here, a method based on 2D Total Variation (2D TV) minimization to improve image quality without the need to increase the dose was proposed. Two phantoms were used to acquire data at different dose ranges (0.88-2.19 mGy for Gammex 156 and 0.65-1.71 mGy for our phantom). A 2D TV minimization filter was applied to the data, and the image quality was assessed through contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the detectability index of lesions before and after filtering. The results showed a decrease in 2D TV values after filtering, with variations of up to 31%, increasing image quality. The increase in CNR values after filtering showed that it is possible to use lower doses (-26%, on average) without compromising on image quality. The detectability index had substantial increases (up to 14%), especially in smaller lesions. So, not only did the proposed approach allow for the enhancement of image quality without increasing the dose, but it also improved the chances of detecting small lesions that could be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Mota
- Faculdade de Ciências, Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João Mendes
- Faculdade de Ciências, Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
- Faculdade de Ciências, LASIGE, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Nuno Matela
- Faculdade de Ciências, Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
La Forgia D, Signorile R, Bove S, Arezzo F, Cormio G, Daniele A, Dellino M, Fanizzi A, Gatta G, Lafranceschina M, Massafra R, Rizzo A, Zito FA, Neri E, Faggioni L. Impact of the systematic introduction of tomosynthesis on breast biopsies: 10 years of results. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01640-7. [PMID: 37198373 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01640-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is a cutting-edge technology introduced in recent years as an in-depth analysis of breast cancer diagnostics. Compared with 2D Full-Field Digital Mammography, DBT has demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting breast tumors. This work aims to quantitatively evaluate the impact of the systematic introduction of DBT in terms of Biopsy Rate and Positive Predictive Values for the number of biopsies performed (PPV-3). For this purpose, we collected 69,384 mammograms and 7894 biopsies, of which 6484 were Core Biopsies and 1410 were stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsies (VABBs), performed on female patients afferent to the Breast Unit of the Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" of Bari from 2012 to 2021, thus, in the period before, during and after the systematic introduction of DBT. Linear regression analysis was then implemented to investigate how the Biopsy Rate had changed over the 10 year screening. The next step was to focus on VABBs, which were generally performed during in-depth examinations of mammogram detected lesions. Finally, three radiologists from the institute's Breast Unit underwent a comparative study to ascertain their performances in terms of breast cancer detection rates before and after the introduction of DBT. As a result, it was demonstrated that both the overall Biopsy Rate and the VABBs Biopsy Rate significantly decreased following the introduction of DBT, with the diagnosis of an equal number of tumors. Besides, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three operators evaluated. In conclusion, this work highlights how the systematic introduction of DBT has significantly impacted the breast cancer diagnostic procedure, by improving the diagnostic quality and thereby reducing needless biopsies, resulting in a consequent reduction in costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele La Forgia
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Rahel Signorile
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Samantha Bove
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Daniele
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Paolo Hospital, 70123, Bari, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy
| | - Annarita Fanizzi
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Gatta
- Breast Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Internship, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via De Crecchio 7, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Miria Lafranceschina
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaella Massafra
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, I.R.C.C.S, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Neri
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Monticciolo DL. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Decade of Practice in Review. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:127-133. [PMID: 36058505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), introduced in 2011, was thought to be a further evolution of full-field digital mammography (DM). Assessing DBT presents unique challenges. The widely variable settings in which DBT has been applied affect outcomes. In initial studies comparing DM-DBT with DM, outcomes for cancer detection rates (CDRs) and recall rates have been mixed. CDR improves most in biennial screening settings, with little or no improvement in annual screening. Recall rates improve most where rates are highest; no improvement is seen in European prospective trials. Adoption of synthesized mammography (SM), derived from the tomosynthesis acquisition and intended to avoid the DM exposure, has been slow because of inferior image quality. Despite this, SM-DBT has shown equivalent outcomes measures to DM-DBT. An important exception is the To-Be randomized controlled trial, which showed that SM-DBT was equivalent to DM in CDR, not better. To date, interval cancer rate, a surrogate for mortality reduction, has not been shown to be improved by DBT. We may have reached the limit of morphological assessment in x-ray technique. Its use may evolve with advancements in technology as use of contrast agents expands, algorithms for SM progress, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsy proliferates. Our expectations of the contributions of DBT will evolve as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra L Monticciolo
- Dr Robert and Alma Moreton Centennial Chair in Radiology, Professor of Radiology, and Vice Chair for Research and Section Chief, Breast Imaging, Baylor Scott & White Healthcare, Central Texas, Temple, Texas; Past President, American College of Radiology.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Norsuddin NM, Mei Sin JG, Ravintaran R, Arasaratnam S, Abdul Karim MK. Impact of age and breast thickness on mean glandular dose of standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 192:110525. [PMID: 36436228 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
This study compares the mean glandular dose (MGD) across 2D, 3D projection and Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) mammographic techniques. The important metadata were extracted from the digital mammography console. 650 subjects were clustered based on projections, age and CBT. The MGD of 2D, 3D, and CEDM was positively correlated with CBT but inversely correlated with the age factor. This study indicate MGD of CEDM was 16% and 22% lower compared to 2D and 3D techniques, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin
- Department of Diagnostic & Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Justine Go Mei Sin
- Department of Diagnostic & Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Rathieswari Ravintaran
- Department of Diagnostic & Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Shantini Arasaratnam
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fiaschetti V, Ubaldi N, De Fazio S, Ricci A, Maspes F, Cossu E. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:35-48. [PMID: 36534241 PMCID: PMC9931797 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01570-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if digital breast tomosynthesis spot compression view (DBT-SCV) could be an additional projection to confirm or deny architectural distortions (ADs) detected by digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) while assessing the average glandular radiation dose. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study enrolling 8864 DBT exams, of which only cases detecting primary AD and with BI-RADS 2-5 score were considered. Seventy-one AD cases examined with DBT-SCV, US and MRI were evaluated for correlation in terms of BI-RADS score; variables among exams were assessed for inter-relationships. RESULTS Of all ADs identified at DBT, biopsy yielded malignancy in only 38%. PPV in identifying malignancy of ADs was higher for DBT-SCV than DBT (p < 0.05); the NPV of DBT-SCV was 94%. The difference between DBT and DBT-SCV in the detection of benign ADs was statistically significant (p < 0.05). AD without US or MRI confirmation was less likely to represent malignancy (p < 0.05). In detecting malignant cases of ADs, both DBT and DBT-SCV were strongly correlated with US and RM (Kappa > 0.90). In identifying benign cases of ADs, DBT-SCV was poorly/moderately correlated with US and RM (Kappa 0.25 and 0.66); DBT was negatively correlated with US and MRI. CONCLUSION DBT-SCV could be useful to better characterize AD firstly identified by DBT, keeping dose levels within the reference limits. If AD is detected by DBT without an US or MRI correlate, that is not confirmed by DBT-SCV, a "wait and see" approach can be applied to reduce unnecessary biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Fiaschetti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy. .,European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Nicolo’ Ubaldi
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza - University of Rome, Radiology Unit – Sant’Andrea Hospital, 1035 Via Di Grottarossa, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aurora Ricci
- grid.413009.fUOC of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elsa Cossu
- grid.413009.fUOC of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Marshall NW, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: physical methods and experimental data. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has become a well-established breast imaging technique, whose performance has been investigated in many clinical studies, including a number of prospective clinical trials. Results from these studies generally point to non-inferiority in terms of microcalcification detection and superior mass-lesion detection for DBT imaging compared to digital mammography (DM). This modality has become an essential tool in the clinic for assessment and ad-hoc screening but is not yet implemented in most breast screening programmes at a state or national level. While evidence on the clinical utility of DBT has been accumulating, there has also been progress in the development of methods for technical performance assessment and quality control of these imaging systems. DBT is a relatively complicated ‘pseudo-3D’ modality whose technical assessment poses a number of difficulties. This paper reviews methods for the technical performance assessment of DBT devices, starting at the component level in part one and leading up to discussion of system evaluation with physical test objects in part two. We provide some historical and basic theoretical perspective, often starting from methods developed for DM imaging. Data from a multi-vendor comparison are also included, acquired under the medical physics quality control protocol developed by EUREF and currently being consolidated by a European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics working group. These data and associated methods can serve as a reference for the development of reference data and provide some context for clinical studies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wetzl M, Dietzel M, Ohlmeyer S, Uder M, Wenkel E. Spiral breast computed tomography with a photon-counting detector (SBCT): the future of breast imaging? Eur J Radiol 2022; 157:110605. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
21
|
Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101917. [PMID: 36292364 PMCID: PMC9601326 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A set of national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) was established in Malaysia for a range of breast thicknesses in 2013, but no updates for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Due to the increasing number of DBTs used and concern over radiation exposure, this study aimed to explore and establish local diagnostic reference levels for FFDM and DBT in Malaysia health facilities at different compressed breast thickness (CBT) ranges. The CBT, kilovoltage peak (kVp), Entrance surface dose (ESD), and average glandular dose (AGD) were retrospectively extracted from the mammography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header. The 75th and 95th percentile values were obtained for the AGD distribution of each mammography projection for three sets of CBT range. The difference in AGD values between FFDM and DBT at three CBT ranges was determined. The DRLs for FFDM were 1.13 mGy, 1.52 mGy, and 2.87 mGy, while DBT were 1.18 mGy, 1.88 mGy, and 2.78 mGy at CBT ranges of 20−39 mm, 40−59 mm, and 60−99 mm, respectively. The AGD of DBT was significantly higher than FFDM for both mammographic views (p < 0.005). All three CBT groups showed a significant difference in AGD values for FFDM and DBT (p < 0.005). The local DRLs from this study were lower than the national DRLs, with the AGD of FFDM significantly lower than DBT.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lesion-specific exposure parameters for breast cancer diagnosis on digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. Biomed Signal Process Control 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
23
|
Huang ML, Hess K, Ma J, Santiago L, Scoggins ME, Arribas E, Adrada BE, Le-Petross HT, Leung JW, Yang W, Geiser W, Candelaria RP. Prospective Comparison of Synthesized Mammography with DBT and Full-Field Digital Mammography with DBT Uncovers Recall Disagreements That may Impact Cancer Detection. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1039-1045. [PMID: 34538550 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis (SM+DBT) and full-field digital mammography with DBT were prospectively evaluated for recall rate (RR), cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value 1 (PPV1), lesion recall differences, and disagreements in recall for additional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 15, 2015 to January 15, 2017, after informed consent was obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant study, each enrolled patient's SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT were interpreted sequentially by one of eight radiologists. RR, CDR, PPV1, and imaging findings (asymmetry, focal asymmetry, mass, architectural distortion, and calcifications) recalled were reviewed. RESULTS For SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT in 1022 patients, RR was 7.3% and 7.9% (SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: diff= -0.6%; 90% CI= -1.4%, 0.1%); CDR was 6.8 and 7.8 per 1000 (SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: diff= -1.0, 95% CI= -5.5, 2.8, p = 0.317); PPV1 was 9.3% and 9.9% (relative positive predictive value for SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.73-1.22, p = 0.669). FFDM+DBT detected eight cancers; SM+DBT detected seven (missed 1 cancer with calcifications). SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT disagreed on patient recall for additional imaging in 19 patients, with majority (68%, 13/19 patients) in the recall of patients for calcifications. For calcifications, SM+DBT recalled six patients that FFDM+DBT did not recall, and FFDM+DBT recalled seven patients that SM+DBT did not recall, even though the total number of calcifications finding recalled was similar overall for both SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT. CONCLUSION Disagreement in recall of patients for calcifications may impact cancer detection by SM+DBT, warranting further investigation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Niroshani S, Nakamura T, Michiru N, Negishi T. An approach to dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) using a double layer filter: dosimetric and image quality assessment. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:021534. [PMID: 35730431 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac7aed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) is a recently developed advanced technique in digital mammography that uses an iodinated intravenous contrast agent to assess tumor angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of DE-CESM recombined images in terms of radiation dose and image quality. A 50% fibroglandular-50% adipose, custom-made phantom with iodine inserts of 1.0 mgI cm-3, 2.0 mgI cm-3, 4.0 mgI cm-3was used for the estimation of mean glandular dose (MGD) and the image quality. Low-energy (LE) images were acquired with the W/Rh, W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu and W/Rh + 0.5 mm Al while high energy images (HE) are acquired with the W/Rh, W/Rh + 0.06 mm Ba, W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu, and W/Rh + 0.03 mm Ce anode filter combinations. The total MGD was reduced up to a maximum from 1.75 mGy to 1.45 mGy by using Rh + 0.01 mm Cu double-layer filter for both LE and HE imaging of 50 mm, standard 50% fibroglandular phantom compared to Rh single-layer filter with W target. The minimum total MGD reduction (1.69 mGy) was observed when Rh + 0.5 mm Al was used for LE and Rh + 0.06 mm Ba was used for HE exposure. The image quality was comparable with the single-layer filter. The use of W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu or W/Rh + 0.5 mm Al as target/filter combination for LE exposure and W/Rh + 0.01 mm Cu for HE exposure can reduce the additional radiation dose delivered by DE-CESM without degrading the image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachila Niroshani
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiography and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Sri Lanka
| | - Tokiko Nakamura
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Nikaidou Michiru
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Negishi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Breast phantom made of acrylic slabs for tests in mammography DR. Appl Radiat Isot 2022; 188:110389. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
26
|
Heindel W, Weigel S, Gerß J, Hense HW, Sommer A, Krischke M, Kerschke L. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised mammography versus digital screening mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer (TOSYMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:601-611. [PMID: 35427470 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00194-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two dimensional (2D) full-field digital mammography is the current standard of breast cancer screening. Digital breast tomosynthesis generates pseudo-three dimensional datasets of the breast from which synthesised 2D (s2D) mammograms can be reconstructed. This innovative approach reduces the likelihood of overlapping breast tissues that can conceal features of malignancy. We aimed to compare digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D mammography with digital screening mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer. METHODS TOSYMA was a randomised, open-label, superiority trial done at 17 screening units in two federal states of Germany. Eligible participants were women aged 50-69 years who had been invited to participate in a population-wide, quality-controlled mammography screening programme. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D mammography or digital mammography alone using block randomisation (block size of 32), stratified by site. The primary endpoints were the detection rate of invasive breast cancer and invasive interval cancer rate at 24 months, analysed in the modified full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned participants who underwent either type of screening examination. Ten examinations, corresponding to a second study participation, were excluded. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Interval cancer rates will be reported in the follow-up study. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, which included all participants who were randomly assigned. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03377036, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between July 5, 2018, and Dec 30, 2020, 99 689 women were randomly assigned to digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D mammography (n=49 804) or digital mammography (n=49 830). Invasive breast cancers were detected in 354 of 49 715 women with evaluable primary endpoint data in the digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D group (detection rate 7·1 cases per 1000 women screened) and in 240 of 49 762 women in the digital mammography group (4·8 cases per 1000 women screened; odds ratio 1·48 [95% CI 1·25-1·75]; p<0·0001). Adverse events and device deficiencies were rare (six adverse events in each group; 23 device deficiencies in the digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D group vs five device deficiencies in the digital mammography group) and no serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION The results from this study indicate that the detection rate for invasive breast cancer was significantly higher with digital breast tomosynthesis plus s2D mammography than digital mammography alone. Evaluation of interval cancer rates in the follow-up study will further help to investigate incremental long-term benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis screening. FUNDING Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Heindel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Gerß
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Hense
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Alexander Sommer
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Miriam Krischke
- Centre for Clinical Trials Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Laura Kerschke
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sarno A, Mettivier G, Bliznakova K, Hernandez AM, Boone JM, Russo P. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms. Phys Med 2022; 97:50-58. [PMID: 35395535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the bias to the mean glandular dose (MGD) estimates introduced by the homogeneous breast models in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to have an insight into the glandular dose distributions in 2D (digital mammography, DM) and 3D (DBT and breast dedicated CT, BCT) x-ray breast imaging by employing breast models with realistic glandular tissue distribution and organ silhouette. METHODS A Monte Carlo software for DM, DBT and BCT simulations was adopted for the evaluation of glandular dose distribution in 60 computational anthropomorphic phantoms. These computational phantoms were derived from 3D breast images acquired via a clinical BCT scanner. RESULTS g·c·s·T conversion coefficients based on homogeneous breast model led to a MGD overestimate of 18% in DBT when compared to MGD estimated via anthropomorphic phantoms; this overestimate increased up to 21% for recently computed DgNDBT conversion coefficients. The standard deviation of the glandular dose distribution in BCT resulted 60% lower than in DM and 55% lower than in DBT. The glandular dose peak - evaluated as the average value over the 5% of the gland receiving the highest dose - is 2.8 times the MGD in DM, this factor reducing to 2.6 and 1.6 in DBT and BCT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Conventional conversion coefficients for MGD estimates based on homogeneous breast models overestimate MGD by 18%, when compared to MGD estimated via anthropomorphic phantoms. The ratio between the peak glandular dose and the MGD is 2.8 in DM. This ratio is 8% and 75% higher than in DBT and BCT, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Sarno
- University of Naples Federico II, Dept. of Physics "Ettore Pancini", Naples, Italy; INFN Division of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Mettivier
- University of Naples Federico II, Dept. of Physics "Ettore Pancini", Naples, Italy; INFN Division of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - John M Boone
- University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Paolo Russo
- University of Naples Federico II, Dept. of Physics "Ettore Pancini", Naples, Italy; INFN Division of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gennaro G, Cozzi A, Schiaffino S, Sardanelli F, Caumo F. Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Two-Center Prospective Comparison. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1774. [PMID: 35406546 PMCID: PMC8997084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The radiation dose associated with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has been investigated only by single-center studies. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the radiation dose between two centers performing CEM within two prospective studies, using the same type of equipment. The CEM mean glandular dose (MGD) was computed for low energy (LE) and high energy (HE) images and their sum was calculated for each view. MGD and related parameters (entrance dose, breast thickness, compression, and density) were compared between the two centers using the Mann−Whitney test. Finally, per-patient MGD was calculated by pooling the two datasets and determining the contribution of LE and HE images. A total of 348 CEM examinations were analyzed (228 from Center 1 and 120 from Center 2). The median total MGD per view was 2.33 mGy (interquartile range 2.19−2.51 mGy) at Center 1 and 2.46 mGy (interquartile range 2.32−2.70 mGy) at Center 2, with a 0.15 mGy median difference (p < 0.001) equal to 6.2%. LE-images contributed between 64% and 77% to the total patient dose in CEM, with the remaining 23−36% being associated with HE images. The mean radiation dose for a two-view bilateral CEM exam was 4.90 mGy, about 30% higher than for digital mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisella Gennaro
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Andrea Cozzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milano, Italy; (A.C.); (F.S.)
| | - Simone Schiaffino
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy;
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milano, Italy; (A.C.); (F.S.)
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy;
| | - Francesca Caumo
- Unit of Breast Radiology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Impact of Obtaining a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Spot Compression View on Assessment of Equivocal DBT Findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:37-45. [PMID: 35170358 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background: A recently introduced DBT device allows obtaining DBT spot compression views using a small paddle during DBT acquisition. Objective: To evaluate the impact on diagnostic performance of obtaining a DBT spot compression view for assessment of equivocal DBT findings. Methods: This retrospective study included 102 women (mean age, 60 years) in whom a DBT spot compression view was obtained to characterize an equivocal finding on DBT at the performing radiologist's discretion, performed from December 14, 2018 to December 18, 2019. Two fellowship-trained breast radiologists and one breast imaging fellow independently reviewed examinations, aware of the location of the equivocal lesions. Readers first assigned a BI-RADS category using standard DBT views followed immediately by a category using the DBT spot compression view. BIRADS categories 2-3 were considered negative, and categories ≥4a were considered positive. Histology and at least 1 year of imaging follow-up served as reference standard. Intrareader agreement for one reader and interreader agreement among all readers were evaluated using kappa coefficients. Diagnostic performance was compared between DBT with and without DBT spot compression views using McNemar tests. Results: Intrareader agreement increased from 0.43 to 0.72, and interreader agreement increased from 0.21 to 0.45, based on kappa coefficients for DBT with and without spot compression views. Eighteen cancers were present. Compared with standard DBT views, DBT spot compression views yielded significantly increased accuracy for all three readers (74% vs 90%, 73% vs 94%, 71% vs 94%); significantly increased specificity for all three readers (69% vs 90%, 75% vs 94%; 68% vs 93%); and significantly increased sensitivity for one reader (67% vs 94%) without significant change in sensitivity for the two other readers (89% vs 100%; 100% vs 89%). Radiation dose was 1.97 mGy for the DBT spot compression view, versus 1.78-1.81 mGy for standard DBT craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. Conclusion: The DBT spot compression view increased intrareader agreement, interreader agreement, and diagnostic accuracy (primarily from improved specificity); the view's supplemental dose was slightly higher than that of a standard DBT view. Clinical impact: DBT spot compression may help characterize equivocal DBT findings, reducing further workup for benign findings.
Collapse
|
30
|
Opitz M, Zensen S, Breuckmann K, Bos D, Forsting M, Hoffmann O, Stuschke M, Wetter A, Guberina N. Breast Radiation Exposure of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Clinical Follow-Up Setting. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020456. [PMID: 35204547 PMCID: PMC8871344 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
According to a position paper of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC), DBT is close to being introduced in European breast cancer screening programmes. Our study aimed to examine radiation dose delivered by digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (FFDM) in comparison to sole FFDM in a clinical follow-up setting and in an identical patient cohort. Retrospectively, 768 breast examinations of 96 patients were included. Patients received both DBT and FFDM between May 2015 and July 2019: (I) FFDM in cranio-caudal (CC) and DBT in mediolateral oblique (MLO) view, as well as a (II) follow-up examination with FFDM in CC and MLO view. The mean glandular dose (MGD) was determined by the mammography system according to Dance’s model. The MGD (standard deviation (SD), interquartile range (IQR)) was distributed as follows: (I) (CCFFDM+MLODBT) (a) left FFDMCC 1.40 mGy (0.36 mGy, 1.13–1.59 mGy), left DBTMLO 1.62 mGy (0.51 mGy, 1.27–1.82 mGy); (b) right FFDMCC 1.36 mGy (0.34 mGy, 1.14–1.51 mGy), right DBTMLO 1.59 mGy (0.52 mGy, 1.27–1.62 mGy). (II) (CCFFDM+MLOFFDM) (a) left FFDMCC 1.35 mGy (0.35 mGy, 1.10–1.60 mGy), left FFDMMLO 1.40 mGy (0.39 mGy, 1.12–1.59 mGy), (b) right FFDMCC 1.35 mGy (0.33 mGy, 1.12–1.48 mGy), right FFDMMLO 1.40 mGy (0.36 mGy, 1.14–1.58 mGy). MGD was significantly higher for DBT mlo views compared to FFDM (p < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly higher for DBT in MLO views compared to FFDM. However, the MGD of DBT MLO lies below the national diagnostic reference level of 2 mGy for an FFDM view. Hence, our results support the use of either DBT or FFDM as suggested in the ECIBC’s Guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Opitz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
- Correspondence: (M.O.); (S.Z.)
| | - Sebastian Zensen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
- Correspondence: (M.O.); (S.Z.)
| | - Katharina Breuckmann
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
| | - Denise Bos
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
| | - Michael Forsting
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
| | - Oliver Hoffmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Martin Stuschke
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Axel Wetter
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, 21075 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (K.B.); (D.B.); (M.F.); (A.W.); (N.G.)
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Avramova-Cholakova S, Kulama E, Daskalov S, Loveland J. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS WITH FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021; 197:212-229. [PMID: 34977945 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The purpose is to compare full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) technologies on three mammography systems in terms of image quality and patient dose. Two Senographe Essential with DBT and CESM (denoted S1 and S2) and one Selenia Dimensions (S3) with FFDM and DBT were considered. Dosimetry methods recommended in the European protocol were used. Image quality was tested with CDMAM in FFDM and DBT and with ideal observer method in FFDM. Mean values of mean glandular dose (MGD) from whole patient samples on S1, S2 and S3 were as follows: FFDM 1.65, 1.84 and 2.23 mGy; DBT 2.03, 1.96 and 2.87 mGy; CESM 2.65 and 3.16 mGy, respectively. S3 exhibited better low-contrast detectability for the smallest sized discs of CDMAM and ideal observer in FFDM, and for the largest sized discs in DBT, at similar dose levels.
Collapse
|
32
|
Teoh KC, Manan HA, Mohd Norsuddin N, Rizuana IH. Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:1758. [PMID: 34946484 PMCID: PMC8700789 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer is diagnosed using mammography, the gold standard in breast screening. However, its increased use also provokes radiation-induced breast malignancy. Thus, monitoring and regulating the mean glandular dose (MGD) is essential. The purpose of this study was to determine MGD for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the radiology department of a single centre. We also analysed the exposure factors as a function of breast thickness. A total of 436 patients underwent both FFDM and DBT. MGD was auto calculated by the mammographic machine for each projection. Patients' data included compressed breast thickness (CBT), peak kilovoltage (kVp), milliampere-seconds (mAs) and MGD (mGy). Result analysis showed that there is a significant difference in MGD between the two systems, namely FFDM and DBT. However, the MGD values in our centre were comparable to other centres, as well as the European guideline (<2.5 mGy) for a standard breast. Although DBT improves the clinical outcome and quality of diagnosis, the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis should not be neglected. Regular quality control testing on mammography equipment must be performed for dose monitoring in women following a screening mammography in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kar Choon Teoh
- Department of Radiology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras 56000, Malaysia;
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Makmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras 56000, Malaysia;
| | - Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin
- Diagnostic Imaging & Radiotherapy Program, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50586, Malaysia;
| | - Iqbal Hussain Rizuana
- Department of Radiology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras 56000, Malaysia;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kamezawa C, Cramer A, Krull W, Yashiro W, Hyodo K, Gupta R. Dynamic X-ray elastography using a pulsed photocathode source. Sci Rep 2021; 11:24128. [PMID: 34916531 PMCID: PMC8677743 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03221-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
X-ray absorption of breast cancers and surrounding healthy tissue can be very similar, a situation that sometimes leads to missed cancers or false-positive diagnoses. To increase the accuracy of mammography and breast tomosynthesis, we describe dynamic X-ray elastography using a novel pulsed X-ray source. This new imaging modality provides both absorption and mechanical properties of the imaged material. We use a small acoustic speaker to vibrate the sample while a synchronously pulsed cold cathode X-ray source images the mechanical deformation. Using these stroboscopic images, we derive two-dimensional stiffness maps of the sample in addition to the conventional X-ray image. In a breast phantom composed of ZrO2 powder embedded in gel, dynamic elastography derived stiffness maps were able to discriminate a hard inclusion from surrounding material with a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 4.5. The CNR on the corresponding absorption image was 1.1. This demonstrates the feasibility of dynamic X-ray elastography with a synchronously pulsed X-ray source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chika Kamezawa
- Department of Materials Structure Science, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
- Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
- Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (IMRAM), Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8577, Japan
| | - Avilash Cramer
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, 20115, USA
| | | | - Wataru Yashiro
- Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (IMRAM), Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8577, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Hyodo
- Department of Materials Structure Science, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
- Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
| | - Rajiv Gupta
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, 20115, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Influence of double layer filter on mean glandular dose (MGD) and image quality in low energy image of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (LE-CESM). Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:340-347. [PMID: 34838440 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate mean glandular dose (MGD) and image quality in low energy imaging from contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) when using double-layer filtration. METHODOLOGY A dedicated phantom was used to quantitatively estimate the MGD and image quality. The target slab of the phantom consisted of three iodine coins having a concentration of 1.0 mgI/cm3, 2.0 mgI/cm3, 4.0 mgI/cm3, a 100% adipose equivalent coin and a 100% glandular equivalent coin. The phantom was exposed using a semiautomated function at 28 k, 30 kV and 32 kV. MGD. Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) were estimated for Mo/Rh, Mo/Rh + Cu, Mo/Rh + Al and Mo/Rh + Cd combinations using three breast equivalent compositions. RESULTS MGD was reduced up to a maximum of 1.03 mGy from 1.17 mGy for 100% adipose tissue. 1.18 mGy from 1.34 mGy for 50% glandular tissue and 1.39 mGy from 1.72 mGy for the 100% glandular phantom when using double-layer filtration. All of the above-mentioned results were obtained for the 50 mm phantom using 32 kV. CNR and FOM values were not significantly reduced with a double-layer filter when compared to a single-layer filter. CONCLUSION The present study concluded that Mo/Rh + Cu is the best combination to reduce the MGD significantly when compared to Mo/Rh + Al or Mo/Rh + Cd. Mo/Rh + Cu also achieved optimal image quality when compared to the Mo/Rh single filter combination. IMPLICATIONS OF PRACTICE The use of a double-layer filter in low energy imaging of CESM results in a significant reduction in MGD without degrading the quality of the image.
Collapse
|
35
|
Rahman WT, Helvie MA. Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 83:3-14. [PMID: 34903436 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females worldwide with rising incidence. In the United States, screening mammography and advances in therapy have lowered mortality by 41% since 1990. Screening mammography is supported by randomized control trials (RCT), observational studies, and computer model data. Digital breast tomosynthesis is a new technology that addresses limitations in mammography resulting from overlapping breast tissue, improving its sensitivity and specificity. Patients at high risk for breast cancer include those with a ≥20% lifetime risk, high-risk germline mutation, or history of thoracic radiation treatment between 10-30 years of age. Such patients are recommended to undergo annual screening mammography and adjunctive annual screening breast MRI. Patients unable to undergo MRI may undergo whole breast ultrasound or contrast-enhanced mammography. Pregnant and lactating patients at average risk for breast cancer are recommended to undergo age-appropriate screening mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tania Rahman
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Mark A Helvie
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hande PC, Desai SS, Arneja SK, Sathian S. Utility of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Two-Dimensional Synthesized Mammography Images: A Pictorial Essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31:678-688. [PMID: 34790314 PMCID: PMC8590550 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1734378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Mammography has been established as the key modality in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancers. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has emerged as a mammographic technique which allows improved visualization of abnormalities by reducing the effect of overlapping breast tissue.
Purpose
This article is a pictorial essay which highlights the advantages of DBT with two-dimensional (2D) synthesized mammography (2DSM) images, its clinical applications, and its role in breast imaging.
Materials and Methods
Selenia Dimensions HD mammography machine performs DBT which acquires a series of low-dose digital mammographic images of the compressed breast followed by full-field digital mammography. Software using specialized algorithms helps to create a 2DSM image reconstructed from the DBT data set. The images are interpreted on a dedicated work station on high-resolution monitors by the radiologist. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon is used for reporting. High-resolution breast ultrasound which includes evaluation of the axilla is done for all cases.
Conclusion
DBT improves detection and better characterization of lesions which thereby increases confidence of interpretation of mammograms and assigning BI-RADS categories for further management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradipta C Hande
- Division of Radiology, Department of Imaging, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sabita S Desai
- Department of Radiology, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sarabjeet K Arneja
- Department of Surgical Pathology and Cytology, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sreedevi Sathian
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Evaluation of Breast Galactography Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Clinical Exploratory Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112060. [PMID: 34829407 PMCID: PMC8622426 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the application value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in breast galactography. Materials and Methods: A total of 128 patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) were selected to undergo galactography. DBT and FFDM were performed for each patient after injecting the contrast agent; the radiation dose of DBT and FFDM was calculated, and the image quality was evaluated in consensus by two senior breast radiologists. Histopathologic data were found in 49 of the 128 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for both FFDM- and DBT-galactography were calculated using histopathologic results as a reference standard. Data were presented as percentages along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The average age of the 128 patients was 46.53 years. The average glandular dose (AGD) of DBT-galactography was slightly higher than that of FFDM-galactography (p < 0.001). DBT-galactography was 30.7% higher than FFDM-galactography in CC view, while DBT-galactography increased by 21.7% compared with FFDM-galactography in ML view. Regarding catheter anatomic distortion, structure detail, and overall image quality groups, DBT scores were higher than FFDM scores, and the differences were significant for all measures (p < 0.05). In 49 patients with pathological nipple discharge, we found that the DBT-galactography had higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV (93.3%, 75%, 97.7%, and 50%, respectively) than FFDM-galactography (91.1%, 50%, 95.3%, and 33.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Compared to FFDM-galactography, within the acceptable radiation dose range, DBT-galactography increases the sensitivity and specificity of lesion detection by improving the image quality, providing more confidence for the diagnosis of clinical ductal lesions.
Collapse
|
38
|
Vegunta S, Kling JM, Patel BK. Supplemental Cancer Screening for Women With Dense Breasts: Guidance for Health Care Professionals. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:2891-2904. [PMID: 34686363 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Mammography is the standard for breast cancer screening. The sensitivity of mammography in identifying breast cancer, however, is reduced for women with dense breasts. Thirty-eight states have passed laws requiring that all women be notified of breast tissue density results in their mammogram report. The notification includes a statement that differs by state, encouraging women to discuss supplemental screening options with their health care professionals (HCPs). Several supplemental screening tests are available for women with dense breast tissue, but no established guidelines exist to direct HCPs in their recommendation of preferred supplemental screening test. Tailored screening, which takes into consideration the patient's mammographic breast density and lifetime breast cancer risk, can guide breast cancer screening strategies that are more comprehensive. This review describes the benefits and limitations of the various available supplemental screening tests to guide HCPs and patients in choosing the appropriate breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suneela Vegunta
- Division of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
| | - Juliana M Kling
- Division of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Bhavika K Patel
- Division of Breast Imaging, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cepeda Martins AR, Di Maria S, Afonso J, Pereira M, Pereira J, Vaz P. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:333-339. [PMID: 34565679 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Digital Mammography (DM-2D) and more recently Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), are two of the most effective imaging modalities for breast cancer detection, often used in screening programmes. It may happen that exams using these two imaging modalities are inadvertently performed to pregnant women. The objective of this study is to assess the dose in the uterus due to DM-2D and DBT exams, according to two main irradiation scenarios: in the 1st scenario the exposure parameters were pre-selected directly by the imaging system, while in the 2nd scenario, the maximum exposure parameters were chosen. METHODS The mammography equipment used was a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration. A physical anthropomorphic phantom, PMMA plates (simulating a breast thickness of 6 cm) and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure entrance air kerma values on the phantom's breast and abdomen in order to successively estimate the mean glandular dose (MGD) and the dose in the uterus. For the two irradiation scenarios chosen, two-breast imaging modalities were selected: 1) DBT in Cranio-Caudal (CC) view (with 28 kV and 160 mAs as exposure parameters), 2) DBT and DM in Medio Lateral-Oblique (MLO) and CC views (with 34 kV and 250 mAs as exposure parameters). RESULTS In the 1st scenario, the TLD measurements did not detect significant dose values in the abdomen whereas the MGD estimated using the D.R. Dance model was in close agreement with data available in the literature. In the 2nd scenario, there was no significant difference in MGD estimation between the different views, whereas the air kerma values in the abdomen (in DBT mode, CC and MLO) were 0.049 mGy and 0.004 mGy respectively. In CC DM-2D mode the abdomen air kerma value was 0.026 mGy, with no significant detected value in MLO view. CONCLUSIONS For the dose in the uterus, the obtained values seem to indicate that DM-2D and DBT examinations inadvertently performed during pregnancy do not pose a significant radiological risk, even considering the case of overexposure in both breasts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The accurate knowledge of the doses in DM-2D and DBT will contribute to raise the awareness among medical practitioners involved in breast imaging empowering them to provide accurate information about dose levels in the uterus, improving their radiation risk communication skills and consequently helping to reduce the anxiety of pregnant women undergoing this type of examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Cepeda Martins
- Inspeção Geral da Agricultura, do Mar, do Ambiente, e do Ordenamento do Territorio (IGAMOT), Seção Radiações Ionizantes, Rua de O Seculo, N.51, 1200-433, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - S Di Maria
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear, Estrada Nacional 10, km 139,7, 2695-066, Bobadela LRS, Portugal.
| | - J Afonso
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - M Pereira
- Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente, Departamento de Emergências e Proteção Radiológica, Divisão de Autorização e Segurança Nuclear, Rua da Murgueira 9 - Zambujal - Alfragide, 2610-124, Amadora, Portugal
| | - J Pereira
- Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente, Departamento de Emergências e Proteção Radiológica, Divisão de Autorização e Segurança Nuclear, Rua da Murgueira 9 - Zambujal - Alfragide, 2610-124, Amadora, Portugal
| | - P Vaz
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear, Estrada Nacional 10, km 139,7, 2695-066, Bobadela LRS, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:314-325. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
41
|
Clauser P, Baltzer PAT, Kapetas P, Woitek R, Weber M, Leone F, Bernathova M, Helbich TH. One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting? Eur Radiol 2021; 32:661-670. [PMID: 34324025 PMCID: PMC8660729 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08079-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance in the assessment setting of three protocols: one-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (WA-DBT) with synthetic mammography (SM), two-view WA-DBT/SM, and two-view digital mammography (DM). Methods Included in this retrospective study were patients who underwent bilateral two-view DM and WA-DBT. SM were reconstructed from the WA-DBT data. The standard of reference was histology and/or 2 years follow-up. Included were 205 women with 179 lesions (89 malignant, 90 benign). Four blinded readers randomly evaluated images to assess density, lesion type, and level of suspicion according to BI-RADS. Three protocols were evaluated: two-view DM, one-view (mediolateral oblique) WA-DBT/SM, and two-view WA-DBT/SM. Detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated and compared using multivariate analysis. Reading time was assessed. Results The detection rate was higher with two-view WA-DBT/SM (p = 0.063). Sensitivity was higher for two-view WA-DBT/SM compared to two-view DM (p = 0.001) and one-view WA-DBT/SM (p = 0.058). No significant differences in specificity were found. Accuracy was higher with both one-view WA-DBT/SM and two-view WA-DBT/SM compared to DM (p = 0.003 and > 0.001, respectively). Accuracy did not differ between one- and two-view WA-DBT/SM. Two-view WA-DBT/SM performed better for masses and asymmetries. Reading times were significantly longer when WA-DBT was evaluated. Conclusions One-view and two-view WA-DBT/SM can achieve a higher diagnostic performance compared to two-view DM. The detection rate and sensitivity were highest with two-view WA-DBT/SM. Two-view WA-DBT/SM appears to be the most appropriate tool for the assessment of breast lesions. Key Points • Detection rate with two-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (WA-DBT) is significantly higher than with two-view digital mammography in the assessment setting. • Diagnostic accuracy of one-view and two-view WA-DBT with synthetic mammography (SM) in the assessment setting is higher than that of two-view digital mammography. • Compared to one-view WA-DBT with SM, two-view WA-DBT with SM seems to be the most appropriate tool for the assessment of breast lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Kapetas
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Weber
- Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Federica Leone
- Ospedale Luigi Sacco - Polo Universitario, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Bernathova
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alves MS, Belinato W, Santos WS, Galeano DC, Neves LP, Perini AP, N Souza D. Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Evaluated by Monte Carlo Technique. HEALTH PHYSICS 2021; 121:18-29. [PMID: 33867436 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The influence of the angular deviation of the tube during digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition to the dose in the examined breast and in other organs and tissues is not well known. In this work, the Monte Carlo method was used with an adult female virtual anthropomorphic phantom to investigate the impact of this angular variation on the breast dose. The absorbed dose in the examined breast was normalized by the air kerma, which resulted in an absorbed dose coefficient (DT/Kair) for the breast. The absorbed dose in each organ was normalized by the glandular dose in the breast, resulting in the relative organ dose (ROD). An adult female virtual anthropomorphic phantom (FSTA_M50_H50) was incorporated into a scenario containing tomosynthesis equipment with Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and W/Rh target/filter combinations and tube voltages of 28 kV. The comparison between the results of the simulations considering digital mammography (DM) and DBT data showed that the DT/Kair values for the examined breast obtained with the DBT parameters were up to 24 times higher than with the DT/Kair obtained with DM parameters. A DT/Kair of 0.97 × 10-1 mGy mGy-1 was obtained in a DBT exam of the right breast. Considering the other organs, the highest ROD values were observed in the thyroid (6.45 × 10-4), eyes (3.87 × 10-4), liver (1.95 × 10-5), and eye lenses (3.21 × 10-3). A variation in the absorbed dose values for the breast and other organs was observed for all projections different from 0°.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos S Alves
- Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
| | - Walmir Belinato
- Instituto Federal da Bahia (IFBA), Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil
| | - William S Santos
- Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
| | - Diego C Galeano
- Hospital Universitário Júlio Müller, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
| | | | | | - Divanizia N Souza
- Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Alabousi M, Wadera A, Kashif Al-Ghita M, Kashef Al-Ghetaa R, Salameh JP, Pozdnyakov A, Zha N, Samoilov L, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Sadeghirad B, Freitas V, McInnes MDF, Alabousi A. Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:680-690. [PMID: 33372954 PMCID: PMC8168096 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the breast cancer detection rate (CDR), invasive CDR, recall rate, and positive predictive value 1 (PPV1) of digital mammography (DM) alone, combined digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and DM, combined DBT and synthetic 2-dimensional mammography (S2D), and DBT alone. METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched until April 2020 to identify comparative design studies reporting on patients undergoing routine breast cancer screening. Random effects model proportional meta-analyses estimated CDR, invasive CDR, recall rate, and PPV1. Meta-regression modeling was used to compare imaging modalities. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Forty-two studies reporting on 2 606 296 patients (13 003 breast cancer cases) were included. CDR was highest in combined DBT and DM (6.36 per 1000 screened, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.62 to 7.14, P < .001), and combined DBT and S2D (7.40 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 6.49 to 8.37, P < .001) compared with DM alone (4.68 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 4.28 to 5.11). Invasive CDR was highest in combined DBT and DM (4.53 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 3.97 to 5.12, P = .003) and combined DBT and S2D (5.68 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 4.43 to 7.09, P < .001) compared with DM alone (3.42 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 3.02 to 3.83). Recall rate was lowest in combined DBT and S2D (42.3 per 1000 screened, 95% CI = 37.4 to 60.4, P<.001). PPV1 was highest in combined DBT and DM (10.0%, 95% CI = 8.0% to 12.0%, P = .004), and combined DBT and S2D (16.0%, 95% CI = 10.0% to 23.0%, P < .001), whereas no difference was detected for DBT alone (7.0%, 95% CI = 6.0% to 8.0%, P = .75) compared with DM alone (7.0%, 95.0% CI = 5.0% to 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide evidence on key performance metrics for DM, DBT alone, combined DBT and DM, and combined DBT and S2D, which may inform optimal application of these modalities for breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Alabousi
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Akshay Wadera
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rayeh Kashef Al-Ghetaa
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alex Pozdnyakov
- Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nanxi Zha
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lucy Samoilov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Behnam Sadeghirad
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), The Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Vivianne Freitas
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew DF McInnes
- Department of Radiology and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Abdullah Alabousi
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Scaperrotta GP, Boffelli G, Depretto C, Di Leo G, Liguori A, Monaco CG, Anna B, Ferranti C. Guiding vacuum-assisted biopsy in prone position: digital breast tomosynthesis vs stereotactic. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 108:326-330. [PMID: 34041978 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211016101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the performance of prone digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with prone stereotactic-guided VAB (sVAB), focusing on time of procedure, number of expositions, average glandular dose, and complications. METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. From July 2015 to January 2017, 306 patients with 306 suspicious mammographic findings (BI-RADS ⩾4) underwent mammography-guided biopsy, prone sVAB, or prone DBT-VAB. Student t test, chi-square, and multivariate regression statistics were used. RESULTS During the study period, 155 prone sVAB procedures in 155 patients (mean age, 56 years; age range, 39-84 years) and 151 DBT-VABs in 151 patients (mean age, 57 years; age range, 33-84 years) were performed. Mean procedure time was shorter with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (14.5 versus 17.4 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001), and fewer images were acquired with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (8 vs 11, respectively; p < 0.001); the average glandular dose was significantly lower in DBT-VAB versus sVAB (11.8 mGy versus 18 mGy, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the distribution of histologic results (p = 0.74) or breast density (p = 0.09) between the two groups. No major complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION Performance of prone DBT-VAB was superior to prone sVAB because it allowed a faster procedure with fewer radiologic expositions and lower radiation dose.
Collapse
|
45
|
Winter AM, Moy L, Gao Y, Bennett DL. Comparison of Narrow-angle and Wide-angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems in Clinical Practice. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:240-255. [PMID: 38424829 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a pseudo 3D mammography imaging technique that has become widespread since gaining Food and Drug Administration approval in 2011. With this technology, a variable number of tomosynthesis projection images are obtained over an angular range between 15° and 50° for currently available clinical DBT systems. The angular range impacts various aspects of clinical imaging, such as radiation dose, scan time, and image quality, including visualization of calcifications, masses, and architectural distortion. This review presents an overview of the differences between narrow- and wide-angle DBT systems, with an emphasis on their applications in clinical practice. Comparison examples of patients imaged on both narrow- and wide-angle DBT systems illustrate these differences. Understanding the potential variable appearance of imaging findings with narrow- and wide-angle DBT systems is important for radiologists, particularly when comparison images have been obtained on a different DBT system. Furthermore, knowledge about the comparative strengths and limitations of DBT systems is needed for appropriate equipment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Winter
- Saint Louis University, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Linda Moy
- NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yiming Gao
- NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debbie L Bennett
- Saint Louis University, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Application of artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis on synthetic mammograms from breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammograms. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6929-6937. [PMID: 33710372 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07796-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic agreement and performances of synthetic and conventional mammograms when artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) is applied. MATERIAL AND METHOD From January 2017 to April 2017, 192 patients (mean age 53.7 ± 11.7 years) diagnosed with 203 breast cancers were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with digital mammograms (DM) simultaneously. Commercial AI-CAD was applied to the reconstructed synthetic mammograms (SM) from DBT and DM respectively and abnormality scores were calculated. We compared the median abnormality scores between DM and SM with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and used the Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate agreements between the two mammograms and to investigate clinicopathological factors which might affect agreement. Diagnostic performances were compared using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULT The abnormality scores showed a mean difference (bias) of - 3.26 (95% limits of agreement: - 32.69, 26.18) between the two mammograms by the Bland-Altman analysis. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.934 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.946), suggesting high reproducibility. SM showed higher abnormality scores in cancer with distortion and occult findings, T1 and N0 cancer, and luminal type cancer than DM (all p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic performance did not differ between the mammograms (AUC 0.945 for conventional mammograms, 0.938 for synthetic mammograms, p = 0.499). CONCLUSION AI-CAD can also work well on synthetic mammograms, showing good agreement and comparable diagnostic performance compared to its application to DM. KEY POINTS • AI-CAD which was developed based on imaging findings of digital mammograms can also be applied to synthetic mammograms. • AI-CAD showed good agreement and similar diagnostic performance when applied to both synthetic and digital mammograms. • With AI-CAD, synthetic mammograms showed relatively higher abnormality scores in cancer with distortion and occult findings, T1 and N0 cancer, and luminal type cancer than digital mammograms.
Collapse
|
47
|
Santos Aragon LN, Soto-Trujillo D. Effectiveness of Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography in the Diagnosis of Suspicious Lesions for Breast Cancer in an Asymptomatic Population. Cureus 2021; 13:e13838. [PMID: 33717771 PMCID: PMC7952495 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The most frequent malignant tumor in women is breast cancer. A dense breast may mask lesions within the tissue. The constant improvement in diagnosis techniques has made the diagnosis more accurate. Digital mammography loses sensitivity in dense breasts as lesions may be masked by the over-position of tissue. Tomosynthesis increases sensitivity and specificity over diagnostic mammography. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in asymptomatic patients. Materials and methods A cohort study of 1,499 Mexican patients that came for screening at a private health service from January to December 2015. A Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) classification was given by a breast radiologist with the digital mammography reading. Later, a second breast radiologist reviewed the same patients with tomosynthesis and assigned a second BI-RADS category. Results Patients were divided into three age groups. The one with the most had patients between 40-49 years (51.3%), where re-staging to a higher BI-RADS occurred in 40 patients. Re-staging to a lower category was most common in the group of age above 50, where 30 patients were assigned BI-RADS 2 after tomosynthesis. Dense breast (C and D) represented 38%. After tomosynthesis, 28 patients were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5. The prevalence of diseases in groups BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 after re-staging and a breast cancer result was 0.024, with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 88%. When re-staging 2D mammography with 3D tomosynthesis for suspicious lesions classified BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5, the prevalence was 0.23, with a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 98%. In this study, patients were asymptomatic, yet 20 breast cancers were detected, with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 88%, exceeding the specificity of diagnostic mammography. Moreover, when re-staging to a BI-RADS of suspicious findings, the sensitivity was 45%, with a specificity of as high as 98%.
Collapse
|
48
|
Niroshani HS, Jeyasugiththan J, Senanayake G, Negishi T. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2021; 41:79-96. [PMID: 33271512 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abd075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The radiation dose to the breasts should be kept to a minimum as breast tissues are highly sensitive to radiation. In mammography, the mean glandular dose (MGD) is used to specify the patient dose. In this study, data on the MGD during diagnostic mammographic examinations was collected using the database from six digital mammography facilities available in the Western Province in Sri Lanka. Examinations involving breast pathology, breast implants, or compressed breast thicknesses (CBT) outside the range of 20-110 mm were excluded in this study. The mean MGD per breast was 3.50 mGy, with a mean CBT of 57 mm. The mean MGD per facility varies from 1.58 to 2.27 mGy, with overall 75th and 95th percentiles of 2.15 and 2.82 mGy, respectively. The 75th and 95th percentile MGD per image, for the average CBT of 57 ± 12 mm, were 2.00 and 2.65 mGy respectively. The 75th percentile value of the MGD is suggested for the Western Province and it depends on the specific CBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Niroshani
- Department of Nuclear Science, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Department of Radiography & Radiotherapy, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Sri Lanka
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate school of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - G Senanayake
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Sri Lanka
| | - Toru Negishi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate school of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Since its widespread introduction 30 years ago, screening mammography has contributed to substantial reduction in breast cancer-associated mortality, ranging from 15% to 50% in observational trials. It is currently the best examination available for the early diagnosis of breast cancer, when survival and treatment options are most favorable. However, like all medical tests and procedures, screening mammography has associated risks, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment, false-positive examinations, false-positive biopsies, and radiation exposure. Women should be aware of the benefits and risks of screening mammography in order to make the most appropriate care decisions for themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen H Neal
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Mark A Helvie
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Association of the Differences in Average Glandular Dose with Breast Cancer Risk. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020. [DOI: 10.1155/2020/8943659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. To compare the differences in normalized average glandular dose (NAGD) between the breasts of healthy subjects and those of cancer patients and to determine if the NAGD difference is associated with breast cancer risk and improves breast cancer classification. Materials and Methods. Craniocaudal view and mediolateral view full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images were obtained from 1682 healthy subjects whose breasts were categorized as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) I or II and from 811 biopsy-confirmed unilateral breast cancer patients whose breasts on the contralateral side were category I or II. Both populations were randomized into training and test sets. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to build the breast cancer risk assessment model, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (
) was used to evaluate the model. Twenty-two breast cancer patients who were originally categorized as BI-RADS I or II for both breasts, but were diagnosed with unilateral biopsy-confirmed breast cancer subsequently, were included to validate the model. Results. The NAGD differences in both FFDM images between tumor-bearing breasts and the healthy breasts of patients were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects (
). The model with NAGD differences had a higher
value than the model without NAGD differences. While there was no NAGD differences between originally healthy breasts of breast cancer patients, significant NAGD differences between now tumor-bearing breasts and the then previously healthy breasts were found in both FFDM images. Conclusions. NAGD differences between both breasts can be included in the breast cancer risk assessment model to evaluate breast cancer risk.
Collapse
|