Radiomics nomogram of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a multicenter study

Assessment of the axilla in women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing primary surgery: a review

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is routinely performed in people with node-negative early breast cancer to assess the axilla. SNB has no proven therapeutic benefit. Nodal status information obtained from SNB helps in prognostication and can influence adjuvant systemic and locoregional treatment choices. However, the redundancy of the nodal status information is becoming increasingly apparent. The accuracy of radiological assessment of the axilla, combined with the strong influence of tumour biology on systemic and locoregional therapy requirements, has prompted many to consider alternative options for SNB. SNB contributes significantly to decreased quality of life in early breast cancer patients. Substantial improvements in workflow and cost could accrue by removing SNB from early breast cancer treatment. We review the current viewpoints and ideas for alternative options for assessing and managing a clinically negative axilla in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Omitting SNB in selected cases or replacing SNB with a non-invasive predictive model appear to be viable options based on current literature.

Radiomics in cone-beam breast CT for the prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a multi-center multi-device study

OBJECTIVES

To develop a radiomics model in contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) status and metastatic burden of breast cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent CE-CBBCT examination with two scanners between 2012 and 2021 from two institutions were enrolled. The primary tumor was annotated in each patient image, from which 1781 radiomics features were extracted with PyRadiomics. After feature selection, support vector machine models were developed to predict ALN status and metastatic burden. To avoid overfitting on a specific patient subset, 100 randomly stratified splits were made to assign the patients to either training/fine-tuning or test set. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these radiomics models was compared to those obtained when training the models only with clinical features and combined clinical-radiomics descriptors. Ground truth was established by histopathology.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen patients had ALN metastasis (N + (≥ 1)). Of these, 74 had low burden (N + (1~2)) and 44 high burden (N + (≥ 3)). The remaining 156 patients had none (N0). AUC values across the 100 test repeats in predicting ALN status (N0/N + (≥ 1)) were 0.75 ± 0.05 (0.67~0.93, radiomics model), 0.68 ± 0.07 (0.53~0.85, clinical model), and 0.74 ± 0.05 (0.67~0.88, combined model). For metastatic burden prediction (N + (1~2)/N + (≥ 3)), AUC values were 0.65 ± 0.10 (0.50~0.88, radiomics model), 0.55 ± 0.10 (0.40~0.80, clinical model), and 0.64 ± 0.09 (0.50~0.90, combined model), with all the ranges spanning 0.5. In both cases, the radiomics model was significantly better than the clinical model (both p < 0.01) and comparable with the combined model (p = 0.56 and 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features of primary tumors could have potential in predicting ALN metastasis in CE-CBBCT imaging.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The findings support potential clinical use of radiomics for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients and addressing the limited axilla coverage of cone-beam breast CT.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT-based radiomics could have potential to predict N0 vs. N + (≥ 1) and, to a limited extent, N + (1~2) vs. N + (≥ 3) from primary tumor, and this could help address the limited axilla coverage, pending future verifications on larger cohorts. • The average AUC of radiomics and combined models was significantly higher than that of clinical models but showed no significant difference between themselves. • Radiomics features descriptive of tumor texture were found informative on axillary lymph node status, highlighting a higher heterogeneity for tumor with positive axillary lymph node.

State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging technology with promise for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and procedural guidance. However, best uses of CEM in comparison with other breast imaging modalities such as tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI remain inconclusive in many clinical settings. This review article summarizes recent peer-reviewed literature, emphasizing retrospective reviews, prospective clinical trials, and meta-analyses published from 2020 to 2023. The intent of this article is to supplement prior comprehensive reviews and summarize the current state-of-the-art of CEM.

Multi-modality radiomics model predicts axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer using MRI and mammography

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop a multi-modality model to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis by combining clinical predictors with radiomic features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography (MMG) in breast cancer. This model might potentially eliminate unnecessary axillary surgery in cases without ALN metastasis, thereby minimizing surgery-related complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 485 breast cancer patients from two hospitals and extracted radiomics features from tumor and lymph node regions on MRI and MMG images. After feature selection, three random forest models were built using the retained features, respectively. Significant clinical factors were integrated with these radiomics models to construct a multi-modality model. The multi-modality model was compared to radiologists' diagnoses on axillary ultrasound and MRI. It was also used to assist radiologists in making a secondary diagnosis on MRI.

RESULTS

The multi-modality model showed superior performance with AUCs of 0.964 in the training cohort, 0.916 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.892 in the external validation cohort. It surpassed single-modality models and radiologists' ALN diagnosis on MRI and axillary ultrasound in all validation cohorts. Additionally, the multi-modality model improved radiologists' MRI-based ALN diagnostic ability, increasing the average accuracy from 70.70 to 78.16% for radiologist A and from 75.42 to 81.38% for radiologist B.

CONCLUSION

The multi-modality model can predict ALN metastasis of breast cancer accurately. Moreover, the artificial intelligence (AI) model also assisted the radiologists to improve their diagnostic ability on MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The multi-modality model based on both MRI and mammography images allows preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. With the assistance of the model, the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists can be further improved.

KEY POINTS

• We developed a novel multi-modality model that combines MRI and mammography radiomics with clinical factors to accurately predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis, which has not been previously reported. • Our multi-modality model outperformed both the radiologists' ALN diagnosis based on MRI and axillary ultrasound, as well as single-modality radiomics models based on MRI or mammography. • The multi-modality model can serve as a potential decision support tool to improve the radiologists' ALN diagnosis on MRI.

Radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis-a potential method to address the limitation of axilla coverage in cone-beam breast CT: a bi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Cone-beam breast CT (CBBCT) has an inherent limitation that the axilla cannot be imaged in its entirety. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on clinical factors and contrast-enhanced (CE) CBBCT radiomics features to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and complement limited axilla coverage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 312 patients with breast cancer from two hospitals who underwent CE-CBBCT examination in a clinical trial (NCT01792999) during 2012-2020. Patients from TCIH comprised training set (n = 176) and validation set (n = 43), and patients from SYSUCC comprised external test set (n = 93). 3D ROIs were delineated manually and radiomics features were extracted by 3D Slicer software. RadScore was calculated and radiomics model was constructed after feature selection. Clinical model was built on independent predictors. Nomogram was developed with independent clinical predictors and RadScore. Diagnostic performance was compared among three models by ROC curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of nomogram.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were ALN positive and 173 patients were negative. Twelve radiomics features remained after feature selection. Location and focality were selected as independent predictors for ALN status. The AUC of nomogram in external test set was higher than that of clinical model (0.80 vs. 0.66, p = 0.012). DCA demonstrated that the nomogram had higher overall net benefit than that of clinical model.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram combined CE-CBBCT-based radiomics features and clinical factors could have potential in distinguishing ALN positive from negative and addressing the limitation of axilla coverage in CBBCT.

Noninvasive Staging of Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning: External Validation and Further Model Development

BACKGROUND

Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer present with a node-negative disease. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely used for axillary staging, leaving patients with healthy axillary lymph nodes without therapeutic effects but at risk of morbidities from the intervention. Numerous studies have developed nodal status prediction models for noninvasive axillary staging using postoperative data or imaging features that are not part of the diagnostic workup. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a top-ranked predictor of nodal metastasis; however, its preoperative assessment is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to externally validate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model for noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) in a large population-based cohort (n=18,633) and develop a new MLP in the same cohort. Data were extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer (NKBC, 2014-2017), comprising only routinely and preoperatively available documented clinicopathological variables. A secondary aim was to develop and validate an LVI MLP for imputation of missing LVI status to increase the preoperative feasibility of the original NILS model.

METHODS

Three nonoverlapping cohorts were used for model development and validation. A total of 4 MLPs for nodal status and 1 LVI MLP were developed using 11 to 12 routinely available predictors. Three nodal status models were used to account for the different availabilities of LVI status in the cohorts and external validation in NKBC. The fourth nodal status model was developed for 80% (14,906/18,663) of NKBC cases and validated in the remaining 20% (3727/18,663). Three alternatives for imputation of LVI status were compared. The discriminatory capacity was evaluated using the validation area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in 3 of the nodal status models. The clinical feasibility of the models was evaluated using calibration and decision curve analyses.

RESULTS

External validation of the original NILS model was performed in NKBC (AUC 0.699, 95% CI 0.690-0.708) with good calibration and the potential of sparing 16% of patients with node-negative disease from SLNB. The LVI model was externally validated (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.694-0.799) with good calibration but did not improve the discriminatory performance of the nodal status models. A new nodal status model was developed in NKBC without information on LVI (AUC 0.709, 95% CI: 0.688-0.729), with excellent calibration in the holdout internal validation cohort, resulting in the potential omission of 24% of patients from unnecessary SLNBs.

CONCLUSIONS

The NILS model was externally validated in NKBC, where the imputation of LVI status did not improve the model's discriminatory performance. A new nodal status model demonstrated the feasibility of using register data comprising only the variables available in the preoperative setting for NILS using machine learning. Future steps include ongoing preoperative validation of the NILS model and extending the model with, for example, mammography images.

Construction of a comprehensive predictive model for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The accurate assessment of axillary lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early-stage breast cancer (BC) is of great importance. This study aimed to construct an integrated model based on clinicopathology, ultrasound, PET/CT, and PET radiomics for predicting axillary LNM in early stage of BC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

124 BC patients who underwent 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET/CT and whose diagnosis were confirmed by surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed and included in this study. Ultrasound, PET and clinicopathological features of all patients were analyzed, and PET radiomics features were extracted to establish an ultrasound model (clinicopathology and ultrasound; model 1), a PET model (clinicopathology, ultrasound, and PET; model 2), and a comprehensive model (clinicopathology, ultrasound, PET, and radiomics; model 3), and the diagnostic efficacy of each model was evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The T stage, US_BIRADS, US_LNM, and PET_LNM in the positive axillary LNM group was significantly higher than that of in the negative LNM group (P = 0.013, P = 0.049, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Radiomics score for predicting LNM (RS_LNM) for the negative LNM and positive LNM were statistically significant difference (-1.090 ± 0.448 vs. -0.693 ± 0.344, t = -4.720, P < 0.001), and the AUC was 0.767 (95% CI: 0.674-0.861). The ROC curves showed that model 3 outperformed model 1 for the sensitivity (model 3 vs. model 1, 82.86% vs. 48.57%), and outperformed model 2 for the specificity (model 3 vs. model 2, 82.02% vs. 68.54%) in the prediction of LNM. The AUC of mode 1, model 2 and model 3 was 0.687, 0.826 and 0.874, and the Delong test showed the AUC of model 3 was significantly higher than that of model 1 and model 2 (P < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that model 3 resulted in a higher degree of net benefit for all the patients than model 1 and model 2.

CONCLUSION

The use of a comprehensive model based on clinicopathology, ultrasound, PET/CT, and PET radiomics can effectively improve the diagnostic efficacy of axillary LNM in BC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials Gov (number NCT05826197) on 7th, May 2023.

Intra- and Peritumoral Radiomics of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Predicts Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study aimed to explore the feasibility of radiomics based on intra- and peritumoral regions on preoperative breast cancer contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 809 patients with preoperative breast cancer CEM images from two centers were retrospectively recruited. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select radiomics features extracted from CEM images in regions of the tumor and peritumoral area of five and ten mm as well as construct radiomics signature. A nomogram, including the optimal radiomics signature and clinicopathological factors, was then constructed. Nomogram performance was evaluated using AUC and compared with breast radiologists directly.

RESULTS

In the internal testing set, AUCs of peritumoral signatures decreased when the peritumoral area increased and signaturetumor + 10mm demonstrated the best performance with an AUC of 0.712. The nomogram incorporating signaturetumor + 10mm, tumor diameter, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and CEM-reported lymph node status yielded maximum AUCs of 0.753 and 0.732 in internal and external testing sets, respectively. Moreover, the nomogram outperformed radiologists and improved diagnostic performance of radiologists.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on CEM intra- and peritumoral regions may provide a noninvasive auxiliary tool to guide treatment strategy of ALN metastasis in breast cancer.

Multimodal radiomics and nomogram-based prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: An analysis considering optimal peritumoral region

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal peri-tumoral regions on ultrasound (US) images and investigate the performance of multimodal radiomics for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 326 patients (training cohort: n = 162, internal validation cohort: n = 74, external validation cohort: n = 90). Intra-tumoral region of interests (ROIs) were delineated on US and digital mammography (DM) images. Peri-tumoral ROI (PTR) on US images were gained by dilating actual 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm radius surrounding the tumor. Support vector machine (SVM) method was used to calculate the importance of radiomics features and to pick the 10 most important. Recursive feature elimination-SVM was used to evaluate the efficacy of models with different feature numbers used.

RESULTS

The PTR0.5mm yielded a maximum AUC of 0.802 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.676-0.901) within the validation cohort using SVM classifier. The multimodal radiomics (intra-tumoral US and DM and US-based PTR0.5mm radiomics model) achieved the highest predictive ability (AUC = 0.888/0.844/0.835 and 95% CI = 0.829-0.936/0.741-0.929/0.752-0.896 for training/internal validation/external validation cohort, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The PTR0.5mm could be the optimal area for predicting ALNM. A favorable predictive accuracy for predicting ALNM was achieved using multimodal radiomics and its based nomogram.

Non-invasive Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Early Invasive Breast Cancer Adopting Automated Breast Volume Scanning-Based Radiomics Nomogram: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to develop a non-invasive tool based on the radiomics and ultrasound features of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS), clinicopathological factors and serological indicators to evaluate axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with early invasive breast cancer (EIBC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 179 ABVS images of patients with EIBC at a single center from January 2016 to April 2022 and divided the patients into training and validation sets (ratio 8:2). Additionally, 97 ABVS images of patients with EIBC from a second center were enrolled as the test set. The radiomics signature was established with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Significant ALNM predictors were screened using univariate logistic regression analysis and further combined to construct a nomogram using the multivariate logistic regression model. The receiver operating characteristic curve assessed the nomogram's predictive performance.

DISCUSSION

The constructed radiomics nomogram model, including ABVS radiomics signature, ultrasound assessment of axillary lymph node (ALN) status, convergence sign and erythrocyte distribution width (standard deviation), achieved moderate predictive performance for risk probability evaluation of ALNs in patients with EIBC. Compared with ultrasound, the nomogram model was able to provide a risk probability evaluation tool not only for the ALNs with positive ultrasound features but also for micrometastatic ALNs (generally without positive ultrasound features), which benefited from the radiomics analysis of multi-sourced data of patients with EIBC.

CONCLUSION

This ABVS-based radiomics nomogram model is a pre-operative, non-invasive and visualized tool that can help clinicians choose rational diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for ALNM.

Radiomics of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been regarded as one of the standard treatments for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. No previous study has investigated the feasibility of using a contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics nomogram to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a CESM-based radiomics nomogram to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients were enrolled, which are divided into a training dataset including 82 patients (with 21 pCR and 61 non-pCR) and a testing dataset of 36 patients (with 9 pCR and 27 non-pCR). The tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented by two radiologists on the low-energy and recombined images and radiomics features were extracted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreements of ROI features extraction. In the training set, the variance threshold, SelectKBest method, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to select the optimal radiomics features. Radiomics signature was calculated through a linear combination of selected features. A radiomics nomogram containing radiomics signature score (Rad-score) and clinical risk factors was developed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used to evaluate prediction performance of the radiomics nomogram, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the radiomics nomogram.

RESULTS

The intra- and inter- observer ICCs were 0.769-0.815 and 0.786-0.853, respectively. Thirteen radiomics features were selected to calculate Rad-score. The radiomics nomogram containing Rad-score and clinical risk factor showed an encouraging calibration and discrimination performance with area under the ROC curves of 0.906 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.840-0.966) in the training dataset and 0.790 (95% CI: 0.554-0.952) in the test dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

The CESM-based radiomics nomogram had good prediction performance for pCR after NAC in breast cancer; therefore, it has a good clinical application prospect.

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for preoperatively predicting the axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer on the basis of contrast-enhanced mammography: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test a contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-based radiomics model using intratumoral and peritumoral regions to predict non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis in breast cancer before surgery.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 365 breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis. Intratumoral regions of interest (ROIs) were manually delineated, and peritumoral ROIs (5 and 10 mm) were automatically obtained. Five models, including intratumoral model, peritumoral (5 and 10 mm) models, and intratumoral+peritumoral (5 and 10 mm) models, were constructed by support vector machine classifier on the basis of optimal features selected by variance threshold, SelectKbest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms. The predictive performance of radiomics models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves. An external testing set was used to test the model. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) model was used to compare the predictive performance with radiomics model.

RESULTS

The intratumoral ROI and intratumoral+peritumoral 10-mm ROI-based radiomics model achieved the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6871-0.8266) in the internal testing set. In the external testing set, the AUC of radiomics model was 0.7567 (95% CI: 0.6717-0.8678), higher than that of MSKCC model (AUC = 0.6681, 95% CI: 0.5148-0.8213) (p = 0.361).

CONCLUSIONS

The intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on CEM had an acceptable predictive performance in predicting NSLN metastasis in breast cancer, which could be seen as a supplementary predicting tool to help clinicians make appropriate surgical plans.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The intratumoral and peritumoral CEM-based radiomics model could noninvasively predict NSLN metastasis in breast cancer patients before surgery.

Attention-based deep learning for breast lesions classification on contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop an attention-based deep learning model for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions on CESM.

METHODS

Preoperative CESM images of 1239 patients, which were definitely diagnosed on pathology in a multicentre cohort, were divided into training and validation sets, internal and external test sets. The regions of interest of the breast lesions were outlined manually by a senior radiologist. We adopted three conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs), namely, DenseNet 121, Xception, and ResNet 50, as the backbone architectures and incorporated the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) into them for classification. The performance of the models was analysed in terms of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, accuracy, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV), the F1 score, the precision recall curve (PRC), and heat maps. The final models were compared with the diagnostic performance of conventional CNNs, radiomics models, and two radiologists with specialised breast imaging experience.

RESULTS

The best-performing deep learning model, that is, the CBAM-based Xception, achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.970, a sensitivity of 0.848, a specificity of 1.000, and an accuracy of 0.891 on the external test set, which was higher than those of other CNNs, radiomics models, and radiologists. The PRC and the heat maps also indicated the favourable predictive performance of the attention-based CNN model. The diagnostic performance of two radiologists improved with deep learning assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an attention-based deep learning model based on CESM images can help to distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions, and the diagnostic performance of radiologists improved with deep learning assistance.

How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Recent technological advances in the field of artificial intelligence hold promise in addressing medical challenges in breast cancer care, such as early diagnosis, cancer subtype determination and molecular profiling, prediction of lymph node metastases, and prognostication of treatment response and probability of recurrence. Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, which aims to enhance the existing data available to clinicians by means of advanced mathematical analysis using artificial intelligence. Various published studies from different fields in imaging have highlighted the potential of radiomics to enhance clinical decision making. In this review, we describe the evolution of AI in breast imaging and its frontiers, focusing on handcrafted and deep learning radiomics. We present a typical workflow of a radiomics analysis and a practical "how-to" guide. Finally, we summarize the methodology and implementation of radiomics in breast cancer, based on the most recent scientific literature to help researchers and clinicians gain fundamental knowledge of this emerging technology. Alongside this, we discuss the current limitations of radiomics and challenges of integration into clinical practice with conceptual consistency, data curation, technical reproducibility, adequate accuracy, and clinical translation. The incorporation of radiomics with clinical, histopathological, and genomic information will enable physicians to move forward to a higher level of personalized management of patients with breast cancer.

Radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer based on DCE-MRI: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to noninvasively predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 263 patients with histologically proven invasive breast cancer and who underwent DCE-MRI examination before surgery in two hospitals. All patients had a defined ALN status based on pathological examination results. Regions of interest (ROIs) of the primary tumor and ipsilateral ALN were manually drawn. A total of 1,409 radiomics features were initially computed from each ROI. Next, the low variance threshold, SelectKBest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms were used to extract the radiomics features. The selected radiomics features were used to establish the radiomics signature of the primary tumor and ALN. A radiomics nomogram model, including the radiomics signature and the independent clinical risk factors, was then constructed. The predictive performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) by using the training and testing sets.

RESULTS

ALNM rates of the training, internal testing, and external testing sets were 43.6%, 44.3% and 32.3%, respectively. The nomogram, including clinical risk factors (tumor diameter) and radiomics signature of the primary tumor and ALN, showed good calibration and discrimination with areas under the ROC curves of 0.884, 0.822, and 0.813 in the training, internal and external testing sets, respectively. DCA also showed that radiomics nomogram displayed better clinical predictive usefulness than the clinical or radiomics signature alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics nomogram combined with clinical risk factors and DCE-MRI-based radiomics signature may be used to predict ALN metastasis in a noninvasive manner.

Comparison of MRI and CT-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background

The preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential in prognosis and treatment strategy formulation.

Purpose

To compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of LNM in PDAC.

Material and Methods

In total, 160 consecutive patients with PDAC were retrospectively included, who were divided into the training and validation sets (ratio of 8:2). Two radiologists evaluated LNM basing on morphological abnormalities. Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging, T1-weighted imaging, and multiphase contrast enhanced MRI and multiphase CT, respectively. Overall, 1184 radiomics features were extracted from each volume of interest drawn. Only features with an intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.75 were included. Three sequential feature selection steps—variance threshold, variance thresholding and least absolute shrinkage selection operator—were repeated 20 times with fivefold cross-validation in the training set. Two radiomics models based on multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI were built with the five most frequent features. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) values.

Results

Multiparametric MRI radiomics model achieved improved AUCs (0.791 and 0.786 in the training and validation sets, respectively) than that of the CT radiomics model (0.672 and 0.655 in the training and validation sets, respectively) and of the radiologists’ assessment (0.600–0.613 and 0.560–0.587 in the training and validation sets, respectively).

Conclusion

Multiparametric MRI radiomics model may serve as a potential tool for preoperatively evaluating LNM in PDAC and had superior predictive performance to multiphase CT-based model and radiologists’ assessment.

Diagnostic performance of radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) and sentinel lymph node metastasis (SLNM) in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before April 29, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomic features for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with breast cancer. Spearman's correlation coefficient was determined to assess the threshold effect, and meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the possible causes of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies with 5611 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates suggesting overall diagnostic accuracy of radiomics in detecting LNM were determined: DOR, 23 (95% CI, 16-33); sensitivity, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.84); and AUC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92). The meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity between sensitivity and specificity across the included studies, with no evidence for a threshold effect. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses showed that combined clinical factors, modeling method, region, and imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and X-ray mammography [MMG]) contributed to the heterogeneity in the sensitivity analysis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, modeling methods, MRI, and MMG contributed to the heterogeneity in the specificity analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that radiomics has good diagnostic performance in predicting ALNM and SLNM in breast cancer. Thus, we propose this approach as a clinical method for the preoperative identification of LNM.

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography-Based Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis and Axillary Tumor Burden in Patients With Breast Cancer

Purpose

To establish and evaluate non-invasive models for estimating the risk of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis and axillary tumor burden among breast cancer patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

Materials and Methods

Breast cancer patients with 1–2 positive SLNs who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) examination were enrolled between 2018 and 2021. CESM-based radiomics and deep learning features of tumors were extracted. The correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for further feature selection. Models based on the selected features and clinical risk factors were constructed with multivariate logistic regression. Finally, two radiomics nomograms were proposed for predicting NSLN metastasis and the probability of high axillary tumor burden.

Results

A total of 182 patients [53.13 years ± 10.03 (standard deviation)] were included. For predicting the NSLN metastasis status, the radiomics nomogram built by 5 selected radiomics features and 3 clinical risk factors including the number of positive SLNs, ratio of positive SLNs, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.99] in the testing set and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67–0.97) in the temporal validation cohort. For predicting the high axillary tumor burden, the AUC values of the developed radiomics nomogram are 0.82 (95% CI: 0.66–0.97) in the testing set and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62–0.93) in the temporal validation cohort.

Discussion

CESM images contain useful information for predicting NSLN metastasis and axillary tumor burden of breast cancer patients. Radiomics can inspire the potential of CESM images to identify lymph node metastasis and improve predictive performance.

Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Background

The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods

This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided.

Results

A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P<0.050).

Conclusions

The quantitative and qualitative imaging features of CEM could contribute to distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising technique for breast cancer detection, but conflicting results have been reported in previous meta-analyses. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of CEM diagnostic performance considering different interpretation methods and clinical settings. Materials and Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to July 15, 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating CEM diagnostic performance with histopathology and/or follow-up as the reference standard were included. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Summary diagnostic odds ratio and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated with the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the hierarchical bivariate model, pooling studies with the same image interpretation approach or focused on the same findings. Heterogeneity was investigated through meta-regression and subgroup analysis. Results Sixty studies (67 study parts, 11 049 CEM examinations in 10 605 patients) were included. The overall area under the HSROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.96). Pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 55.7 (95% CI: 42.7, 72.7) with high heterogeneity (τ² = 0.3). At meta-regression, CEM interpretation with both low-energy and recombined images had higher sensitivity (95% vs 94%, P < .001) and specificity (81% vs 71%, P = .03) compared with recombined images alone. At subgroup analysis, CEM showed a 95% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 92, 97) and a 78% pooled specificity (95% CI: 66, 87) from nine studies in patients with dense breasts, while in 10 studies on mammography-detected suspicious findings, CEM had a 92% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 89, 94) and an 84% pooled specificity (95% CI: 73, 91). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced mammography demonstrated high performance in breast cancer detection, especially with joint interpretation of low-energy and recombined images. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bahl in this issue.

Mammography-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review of Current Knowledge and Future Needs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is a highly complex heterogeneous disease. Current validated prognostic factors (e.g., histological grade, lymph node involvement, receptor status, and proliferation index), as well as multigene tests (e.g., Oncotype DX and PAM50) are helpful to describe breast cancer characteristics and predict the chance of recurrence risk and survival. Nevertheless, they are invasive and cannot capture a complete heterogeneity of the entire breast tumor resulting in up to 30% of patients being either over- or under-treated for breast cancer. Furthermore, multigene testings are time consuming and expensive. Radiomics is emerging as a reliable, accurate, non-invasive, and cost-effective approach of using quantitative image features to classify breast cancer characteristics and predict patient outcomes. Several recent radiomics reviews have been conducted in breast cancer, however, specific mammography-based radiomics studies have not been well discussed. This scoping review aims to assess and summarize the current evidence on the potential usefulness of mammography-based (i.e., digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and contrast-enhanced mammography) radiomics in predicting factors that describe breast cancer characteristics, recurrence, and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed database and eligible text reference were searched using relevant keywords to identify studies published between 2015 and December 19, 2020. Studies collected were screened and assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible studies were included and organized into three main sections: radiomics predicting breast cancer characteristics, radiomics predicting breast cancer recurrence and survival, and radiomics integrating with clinical data. Majority of publications reported retrospective studies while three studies examined prospective cohorts. Encouraging results were reported, suggesting the potential clinical value of mammography-based radiomics. Further efforts are required to standardize radiomics approaches and catalogue reproducible and relevant mammographic radiomic features. The role of integrating radiomics with other information is discussed.

CONCLUSION

The potential role of mammography-based radiomics appears promising but more efforts are required to further evaluate its reliability as a routine clinical tool.

Mammography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a mammography-based radiomics model for predicting the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node (LN)-negative invasive breast cancer recurrence based on Oncotype DX and validated it by using multicenter data.

METHODS

A total of 304 potentially eligible patients with pre-operative mammography images and available Oncotype DX score were retrospectively enrolled from two hospitals. The patients were grouped as training set (168 patients), internal test set (72 patients), and external test set (64 patients). Radiomics features were extracted from the mammography images of each patient. Spearman correlation analysis, analysis of variance, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were performed to reduce the redundant features in the training set, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to construct the radiomics signature based on selected features. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to construct classification models that included radiomics signature and clinical risk factors to predict low vs intermediate and high recurrence risk of ER-positive, LN-negative invasive breast cancer in the training set. The models were evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve in the training set. The internal and external test sets were used to confirm the discriminatory power of the models. The clinical usefulness was evaluated by using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The radiomics signature consisting of three radiomics features achieved favorable prediction performance. The multivariate logistic regression model including radiomics signature and clinical risk factors (tumor grade and HER 2) showed good performance with areas under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 0.97), 0.88 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.00), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99) in the training, internal and external test sets, respectively. The DCA indicated that when the threshold probability is ranges from 0.1 to 1.0, the radiomics model adds more net benefit than the "treat all" or "treat none" scheme in internal and external test sets.

CONCLUSION

As a non-invasive pre-operative prediction tool, the mammography-based radiomics model incorporating radiomics and clinical factors show favorable predictive performance for predicting the risk of ER-positive, LN-negative invasive breast cancer recurrence based on Oncotype DX.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The mammography-based radiomics model incorporating radiomics and clinical factors shows favorable predictive performance for predicting the risk of ER-positive, LN-negative invasive breast cancer recurrence.

Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study

Background

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising breast imaging technique. A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomics analysis of CEM. We intended to explore whether a model constructed with both clinical and radiomics features of CEM can better classify benign and malignant breast lesions.

Methods

This retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between August 2017 and February 2020. The data from Center 1 were used as training set and the data from Center 2 were used as external testing set (training: testing =2:1). Models were constructed with the clinical, radiomics, and clinical + radiomics features of CEM. The clinical features included patient age and clinical image features interpreted by the radiologists. The radiomics features were extracted from high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images of CEM. The Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson correlation and Boruta's approach were used to select the radiomics features. Random Forest (RF) and logistic regression were used to establish the models. For the testing set, the areas under the curve (AUCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to evaluate the performance of the models. For the training set, the mean AUCs were obtained by performing internal validation for 100 iterations and then compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

A total of 226 women (mean age: 47.4±10.1 years) with 226 pathologically proven breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were included. For the external testing set, the AUCs were 0.964 (95% CI: 0.918-1.000) for the combined model, 0.947 (95% CI: 0.891-0.997) for the radiomics model, and 0.882 (95% CI: 0.803-0.962) for the clinical model. In the internal validation process, the combined model achieved a mean AUC of 0.934±0.030, which was significantly higher than those of the radiomics (mean AUC =0.921±0.031, adjusted P<0.050) and clinical models (mean AUC =0.907±0.036; adjusted P<0.050).

Conclusions

Incorporating both clinical and radiomics features of CEM may achieve better classification results for breast lesions.

Radiomics Nomogram Based on Radiomics Score from Multiregional Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Clinical Factors for Evaluating HER-2 2+ Status of Breast Cancer

This study aimed to establish and validate a radiomics nomogram using the radiomics score (rad-score) based on multiregional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) features combined with clinical factors for evaluating HER-2 2+ status of breast cancer. A total of 223 patients were retrospectively included. Radiomic features were extracted from multiregional DWI and ADC images. Based on the intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined regions, three rad-scores were calculated using the logistic regression model. Independent parameters were selected among clinical factors and combined rad-score (com-rad-score) using multivariate logistic analysis and used to construct a radiomics nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUCs) of intratumoral and peritumoral rad-scores were 0.824/0.763 and 0.794/0.731 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Com-rad-score achieved the highest AUC (0.860/0.790) among three rad-scores. ER status and com-rad-score were selected to establish the nomogram, which yielded good discrimination (AUC: 0.883/0.848) and calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated the clinical value of the nomogram in the validation cohort. In conclusion, radiomics nomogram, including clinical factors and com-rad-score, showed favorable performance for evaluating HER-2 2+ status in breast cancer.

Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

To conduct perilesional region radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent CEM from November 2017 to February 2020. Lesion contours were manually delineated. Perilesional regions were automatically obtained. Seven regions of interest (ROIs) were obtained for each lesion, including the lesion ROI, annular perilesional ROIs (1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm), and lesion + perilesional ROIs (1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm). Overall, 4,098 radiomics features were extracted from each ROI. Datasets were divided into training and testing sets (1:1). Seven classification models using features from the seven ROIs were constructed using LASSO regression. Model performance was assessed by the AUC with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Overall, 190 women with 223 breast lesions (101 benign; 122 malignant) were enrolled. In the testing set, the annular perilesional ROI of 3-mm model showed the highest AUC of 0.930 (95% CI: 0.882-0.977), followed by the annular perilesional ROI of 1 mm model (AUC = 0.929; 95% CI: 0.881-0.978) and the lesion ROI model (AUC = 0.909; 95% CI: 0.857-0.961). A new model was generated by combining the predicted probabilities of the lesion ROI and annular perilesional ROI of 3-mm models, which achieved a higher AUC in the testing set (AUC = 0.940).

CONCLUSIONS

Annular perilesional radiomics analysis of CEM images is useful for diagnosing breast cancers. Adding annular perilesional information to the radiomics model built on the lesion information may improve the diagnostic performance.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics analysis of the annular perilesional region of 3 mm in CEM images may provide valuable information for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. • The radiomics information from the lesion region and the annular perilesional region may be complementary. Combining the predicted probabilities of the models constructed by the features from the two regions may improve the diagnostic performance of radiomics models.

Recent Radiomics Advancements in Breast Cancer: Lessons and Pitfalls for the Next Future

Radiomics is an emerging translational field of medicine based on the extraction of high-dimensional data from radiological images, with the purpose to reach reliable models to be applied into clinical practice for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of disease response to treatment. We aim to provide the basic information on radiomics to radiologists and clinicians who are focused on breast cancer care, encouraging cooperation with scientists to mine data for a better application in clinical practice. We investigate the workflow and clinical application of radiomics in breast cancer care, as well as the outlook and challenges based on recent studies. Currently, radiomics has the potential ability to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions, to predict breast cancer’s molecular subtypes, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the lymph node metastases. Even though radiomics has been used in tumor diagnosis and prognosis, it is still in the research phase and some challenges need to be faced to obtain a clinical translation. In this review, we discuss the current limitations and promises of radiomics for improvement in further research.

Radiomics: A Primer for Breast Radiologists

Radiomics has a long-standing history in breast imaging with computer-aided detection (CAD) for screening mammography developed in the late 20th century. Although conventional CAD had widespread adoption, the clinical benefits for experienced breast radiologists were debatable due to high false-positive marks and subsequent increased recall rates. The dramatic growth in recent years of artificial intelligence-based analysis, including machine learning and deep learning, has provided numerous opportunities for improved modern radiomics work in breast imaging. There has been extensive radiomics work in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, MRI, ultrasound, PET-CT, and combined multimodality imaging. Specific radiomics outcomes of interest have been diverse, including CAD, prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy, lesion classification, and survival, among other outcomes. Additionally, the radiogenomics subfield that correlates radiomics features with genetics has been very proliferative, in parallel with the clinical validation of breast cancer molecular subtypes and gene expression assays. Despite the promise of radiomics, there are important challenges related to image normalization, limited large unbiased data sets, and lack of external validation. Much of the radiomics work to date has been exploratory using single-institution retrospective series for analysis, but several promising lines of investigation have made the leap to clinical practice with commercially available products. As a result, breast radiologists will increasingly be incorporating radiomics-based tools into their daily practice in the near future. Therefore, breast radiologists must have a broad understanding of the scope, applications, and limitations of radiomics work.

Diagnostic nomogram based on intralesional and perilesional radiomics features and clinical factors of clinically significant prostate cancer

Previous studies on the value of radiomics for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) only utilized intralesional features. However, the role of tumor microenvironment is important in tumor generation and progression. The aim of this study is to build and validate a nomogram based on perilesional and intralesional radiomics features and clinical factors for csPCa. This is a retrospective study, which included 140 patients who underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study used 3.0T T2-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient maps (derived from diffusion-weighted images), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Region of interest (ROI)s were segmented by two radiologists. Intralesional and combined radiomics signatures were built based on radiomics features extracted from intralesional and the combination of radiomics features extracted from intralesional and perilesional volumes. Serum total prostate-specific antigen level and combined radiomics signature scores were used to construct a diagnostic nomogram. Intraclass correlation efficient analysis was used to test intra- and inter-rater agreement of radiomics features. Min-max scalar was used for normalization. One-way analysis of variance or the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for univariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, accuracy, balanced accuracy, and F1-score were used to evaluate radiomics signatures and the nomogram. Also, the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis in testing cohort. Delong test was used to compare area under the curves (AUCs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. In testing cohort, AUC, accuracy, balanced accuracy, and F1-score of combined radiomics signature (0.94, 0.83, 0.80, and 0.87, respectively) were all higher than that of intralesional radiomics signature (0.90, 0.77, 0.74, and 0.83, respectively). The difference between AUCs was insignificant (p of 0.19). AUC, accuracy, balanced accuracy, and F1-score of the nomogram were 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively. Nomogram was clinically useful when threshold probability of a patient is higher than 0.06. Perilesional radiomics features improved the discrimination ability of the radiomics signature. Diagnostic nomogram had a good performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

A Decision Support System Based on BI-RADS and Radiomic Classifiers to Reduce False Positive Breast Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Preliminary Study

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) studies were introduced as a successful help for the detection of calcification, which can be a primary sign of cancer. Expert radiologists are able to detect suspicious calcifications in DBT, but a high number of calcifications with non-malignant diagnosis at biopsy have been reported (false positives, FP). In this study, a radiomic approach was developed and applied on DBT images with the aim to reduce the number of benign calcifications addressed to biopsy and to give the radiologists a helpful decision support system during their diagnostic activity. This allows personalizing patient management on the basis of personalized risk. For this purpose, 49 patients showing microcalcifications on DBT images were retrospectively included, classified by BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) and analyzed. After segmentation of microcalcifications from DBT images, radiomic features were extracted. Features were then selected with respect to their stability within different segmentations and their repeatability in test–retest studies. Stable radiomic features were used to train, validate and test (nested 10-fold cross-validation) a preliminary machine learning radiomic classifier that, combined with BI-RADS classification, allowed a reduction in FP of a factor of 2 and an improvement in positive predictive value of 50%.

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography-Based Radiomics Nomogram for the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Insensitive Breast Cancers

Purpose

We developed and validated a contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics nomogram to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-insensitive breast cancers prior to treatment.

Methods

We enrolled 117 patients with breast cancer who underwent CESM examination and NAC treatment from July 2017 to April 2019. The patients were grouped randomly into a training set (n = 97) and a validation set (n = 20) in a ratio of 8:2. 792 radiomics features were extracted from CESM images including low-energy and recombined images for each patient. Optimal radiomics features were selected by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 10-fold cross-validation, to develop a radiomics score in the training set. A radiomics nomogram incorporating the radiomics score and independent clinical risk factors was then developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. With regard to discrimination and clinical usefulness, radiomics nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The radiomics nomogram that incorporates 11 radiomics features and 3 independent clinical risk factors, including Ki-67 index, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, showed an encouraging discrimination power with AUCs of 0.877 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.816 to 0.924] and 0.81 (95% CI 0.575 to 0.948) in the training and validation sets, respectively. DCA revealed the increased clinical usefulness of this nomogram.

Conclusion

The proposed radiomics nomogram that integrates CESM-derived radiomics features and clinical parameters showed potential feasibility for predicting NAC-insensitive breast cancers.

Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm

BACKGROUND

 Considering radiological examinations not as mere images, but as a source of data, has become the key paradigm in the diagnostic imaging field. This change of perspective is particularly popular in breast imaging. It allows breast radiologists to apply algorithms derived from computer science, to realize innovative clinical applications, and to refine already established methods. In this context, the terminology "imaging biomarker", "radiomics", and "artificial intelligence" are of pivotal importance. These methods promise noninvasive, low-cost (e. g., in comparison to multigene arrays), and workflow-friendly (automated, only one examination, instantaneous results, etc.) delivery of clinically relevant information.

METHODS AND RESULTS

 This paper is designed as a narrative review on the previously mentioned paradigm. The focus is on key concepts in breast imaging and important buzzwords are explained. For all areas of breast imaging, exemplary studies and potential clinical use cases are discussed.

CONCLUSION

 Considering radiological examination as a source of data may optimize patient management by guiding individualized breast cancer diagnosis and oncologic treatment in the age of precision medicine.

KEY POINTS

  · In conventional breast imaging, examinations are interpreted based on patterns perceivable by visual inspection.. · The radiomics paradigm treats breast images as a source of data, containing information beyond what is visible to our eyes.. · This results in radiomic signatures that may be considered as imaging biomarkers, as they provide diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic information.. · Radiomics derived imaging biomarkers may be used to individualize breast cancer treatment in the era of precision medicine.. · The concept and key research of radiomics in the field of breast imaging will be discussed in this narrative review..

CITATION FORMAT

· Dietzel M, Clauser P, Kapetas P et al. Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 898 - 908.

Radiomics Nomogram of DCE-MRI for the Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to establish and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer.

Method

This retrospective study included 296 patients with breast cancer who underwent DCE-MRI examinations between July 2017 and June 2018. A total of 396 radiomics features were extracted from primary tumor. In addition, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to select the features. Radiomics signature and independent risk factors were incorporated to build a radiomics nomogram model. Calibration and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to confirm the performance of the nomogram in the training and validation sets. The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The radiomics signature consisted of three ALN-status-related features, and the nomogram model included the radiomics signature and the MR-reported lymph node (LN) status. The model showed good calibration and discrimination with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.97] in the training set and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95) in the validation set. In the MR-reported LN-negative (cN0) subgroup, the nomogram model also exhibited favorable discriminatory ability (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). DCA findings indicated that the nomogram model was clinically useful.

Conclusions

The MRI-based radiomics nomogram model could be used to preoperatively predict the ALN metastasis of breast cancer.

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Identifying Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions of Sub-1 cm

Objectives

To develop a radiomics nomogram that incorporates contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics features and clinico-radiological variables for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions of sub-1 cm.

Methods

This retrospective study included 139 patients with the diameter of sub-1 cm on cranial caudal (CC) position of recombined images. Radiomics features were extracted from low-energy and recombined images on CC position. The variance threshold, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms were used to select optimal predictive features. Radiomics signature (Rad-score) was calculated by a linear combination of selected features. The independent predictive factors were identified by ANOVA and multivariate logistic regression. A radiomics nomogram was developed to predict the malignant probability of lesions. The performance and clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Nineteen radiomics features were selected to calculate Rad-score. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category and age were identified as predictive factors. The radiomics nomogram combined with Rad-score, BI-RADS category, and age showed better performance (area under curves [AUC]: 0.940, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804-0.992) than Rad-score (AUC: 0.868, 95% CI: 0.711-0.958) and clinico-radiological model (AUC: 0.864, 95% CI: 0.706-0.956) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve and DCA showed that the radiomics nomogram had good consistency and clinical utility.

Conclusions

The radiomics nomogram incorporated with CESM-based radiomics features, BI-RADS category and age could identify benign and malignant breast lesions of sub-1 cm.

Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

Background

To establish pharmacokinetic parameters and a radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 164 breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were prospectively enrolled from December 2017 to May 2018, and underwent DCE-MRI before surgery. Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics features were derived from DCE-MRI data. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was used to select features, which were then utilized to construct three classification models, namely, the pharmacokinetic parameters model, the radiomics model, and the combined model. These models were built through the logistic regression method by using 10-fold cross validation strategy and were evaluated on the basis of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. An independent validation dataset was used to confirm the discriminatory power of the models.

Results

Seven radiomics features were selected by LASSO logistic regression. The radiomics model, the pharmacokinetic parameters model, and the combined model yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.89), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.86), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.89), respectively, for the training cohort and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.90), and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.91), respectively, for the validation cohort. The combined model showed the best performance for the preoperative evaluation of SLN metastasis in breast cancer.

Conclusions

The model incorporating radiomics features and pharmacokinetic parameters can be conveniently used for the individualized preoperative prediction of SLN metastasis in patients with breast cancer.