CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness

Deep learning CT reconstruction improves liver metastases detection

OBJECTIVES

Detection of liver metastases is crucial for guiding oncological management. Computed tomography through iterative reconstructions is widely used in this indication but has certain limitations. Deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) use deep neural networks to achieve a significant noise reduction compared to iterative reconstructions. While reports have demonstrated improvements in image quality, their impact on liver metastases detection remains unclear. Our main objective was to determine whether DLIR affects the number of detected liver metastasis. Our secondary objective was to compare metastases conspicuity between the two reconstruction methods.

METHODS

CT images of 121 patients with liver metastases were reconstructed using a 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (50%-ASiR-V), and three levels of DLIR (DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, and DLIR-high). For each reconstruction, two double-blinded radiologists counted up to a maximum of ten metastases. Visibility and contour definitions were also assessed. Comparisons between methods for continuous parameters were performed using mixed models.

RESULTS

A higher number of metastases was detected by one reader with DLIR-high: 7 (2-10) (median (Q₁-Q₃); total 733) versus 5 (2-10), respectively for DLIR-medium, DLIR-low, and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). Ten patents were detected with more metastases with DLIR-high simultaneously by both readers and a third reader for confirmation. Metastases visibility and contour definition were better with DLIR than ASiR-V.

CONCLUSION

DLIR-high enhanced the detection and visibility of liver metastases compared to ASiR-V, and also increased the number of liver metastases detected.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Deep learning-based reconstruction at high strength allowed an increase in liver metastases detection compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction and can be used in clinical oncology imaging to help overcome the limitations of CT.

KEY POINTS

Detection of liver metastases is crucial but limited with standard CT reconstructions. More liver metastases were detected with deep-learning CT reconstruction compared to iterative reconstruction. Deep learning reconstructions are suitable for hepatic metastases staging and follow-up.

Low-tube-voltage whole-body CT angiography with extremely low iodine dose: a comparison between hybrid-iterative reconstruction and deep-learning image-reconstruction algorithms

AIM

To evaluate arterial enhancement, its depiction, and image quality in low-tube potential whole-body computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) with extremely low iodine dose and compare the results with those obtained by hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) and deep-learning image-reconstruction (DLIR) methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 34 consecutive participants (27 men; mean age, 74.2 years) who underwent whole-body CTA at 80 kVp for evaluating aortic diseases between January and July 2020. Contrast material (240 mg iodine/ml) with simultaneous administration of its quarter volume of saline, which corresponded to 192 mg iodine/ml, was administered. CT raw data were reconstructed using adaptive statistical IR-Veo of 40% (hybrid-IR), DLIR with medium- (DLIR-M), and high-strength level (DLIR-H). A radiologist measured CT attenuation of the arteries and background noise, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was then calculated. Two reviewers qualitatively evaluated the arterial depictions and diagnostic acceptability on axial, multiplanar-reformatted (MPR), and volume-rendered (VR) images.

RESULTS

Mean contrast material volume and iodine weight administered were 64.1 ml and 15.4 g, respectively. The SNRs of the arteries were significantly higher in the following order of the DLIR-H, DLIR-M, and hybrid-IR (p<0.001). Depictions of six arteries on axial, three arteries on MPR, and four arteries on VR images were significantly superior in the DLIR-M or hybrid-IR than in the DLIR-H (p≤0.009 for each). Diagnostic acceptability was significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H than in the hybrid-IR (p<0.001-0.005).

CONCLUSION

DLIR-M showed well-balanced arterial depictions and image quality compared with the hybrid-IR and DLIR-H.

Insights about cervical lymph nodes: Evaluating deep learning-based reconstruction for head and neck computed tomography scan

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate differences in cervical lymph node image quality on dual-energy computed tomography (CT) scan with datasets reconstructed using filter back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Method

Seventy patients with head and neck cancer underwent follow-up contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT examinations. All datasets were reconstructed using FBP, hybrid IR with 30 % adaptive statistical IR (ASiR-V), and DLIR with three selectable levels (low, medium, and high) at 2.5- and 0.625-mm slice thicknesses. Herein, signal, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of lymph nodes and overall image quality, artifact, and noise of selected regions of interest were evaluated by two radiologists. Next, cervical lymph node sharpness was evaluated using full width at half maximum.

Results

DLIR exhibited significantly reduced noise, ranging from 3.8 % to 35.9 % with improved signal-to-noise ratio (11.5-105.6 %) and contrast-to-noise ratio (10.5-107.5 %) compared with FBP and ASiR-V, for cervical lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Further, 0.625-mm-thick images reconstructed using DLIR-medium and DLIR-high had a lower noise than 2.5-mm-thick images reconstructed using FBP and ASiR-V. The lymph node margins and vessels on DLIR-medium and DLIR-high were sharper than those on FBP and ASiR-V (p < 0.05). Both readers agreed that DLIR had a better image quality than the conventional reconstruction algorithms.

Conclusion

DLIR-medium and -high provided superior cervical lymph node image quality in head and neck CT. Improved image quality affords thin-slice DLIR images for dose-reduction protocols in the future.

Detection of urinary tract stones on submillisievert abdominopelvic CT imaging with deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR)

PURPOSE

Urolithiasis is a chronic condition that leads to repeated CT scans throughout the patient's life. The goal was to assess the diagnostic performance and image quality of submillisievert abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in urolithiasis.

METHODS

57 patients with suspected urolithiasis underwent both non-contrast low-dose (LD) and ULD abdominopelvic CT. Raw image data of ULD CT were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 70%) and high-strength-level DLIR (DLIR-H). The performance of ULD CT for the detection of urinary stones was assessed by two readers and compared with LD CT with ASIR-V 70% as a reference standard. Image quality was assessed subjectively and objectively.

RESULTS

266 stones were detected in 38 patients. Mean effective dose was 0.59 mSv for ULD CT and 1.96 mSv for LD CT. For diagnostic performance, sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 94%, respectively, for ULDCT with DLIR-H. There was an almost perfect intra-observer concordance on ULD CT with DLIR-H versus LDCT with ASIR-V 70% (ICC = 0.90 and 0.90 for the two readers). Image noise was significantly lower and signal-to-noise ratio significantly higher with DLIR-H compared to ASIR-V 70%. Subjective image quality was also significantly better with ULDCT with DLIR-H.

CONCLUSION

ULD CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction maintains a good diagnostic performance in urolithiasis, with better image quality than hybrid iterative reconstruction and a significant radiation dose reduction.

Assessment of image quality and impact of deep learning-based software in non-contrast head CT scans

In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the objective and subjective image quality of different reconstruction techniques and a deep learning-based software on non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) images. In total, 152 adult head CT scans (77 female, 75 male; mean age 69.4 ± 18.3 years) obtained from three different CT scanners using different protocols between March and April 2021 were included. CT images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and post-processed using a deep learning-based algorithm (PS). Post-processing significantly reduced noise in FBP-reconstructed images (up to 15.4% reduction) depending on the protocol, leading to improvements in signal-to-noise ratio of up to 19.7%. However, when deep learning-based post-processing was applied to FBP images compared to IR alone, the differences were inconsistent and partly non-significant, which appeared to be protocol or site specific. Subjective assessments showed no significant overall improvement in image quality for all reconstructions and post-processing. Inter-rater reliability was low and preferences varied. Deep learning-based denoising software improved objective image quality compared to FBP in routine head CT. A significant difference compared to IR was observed for only one protocol. Subjective assessments did not indicate a significant clinical impact in terms of improved subjective image quality, likely due to the low noise levels in full-dose images.

[Reduction of Motion Artifacts in Liver MRI Using Deep Learning with High-pass Filtering]

PURPOSE

To investigate whether deep learning with high-pass filtering can be used to effectively reduce motion artifacts in magnetic resonance (MR) images of the liver.

METHODS

The subjects were 69 patients who underwent liver MR examination at our hospital. Simulated motion artifact images (SMAIs) were created from non-artifact images (NAIs) and used for deep learning. Structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and contrast ratio (CR) were used to verify the effect of reducing motion artifacts in motion artifact reduction image (MARI) output from the obtained deep learning model. In the visual assessment, reduction of motion artifacts and image sharpness were evaluated between motion artifact images (MAIs) and MARIs.

RESULTS

The SSIM values were 0.882 on the MARIs and 0.869 on the SMAIs. There was no statistically significant difference in CR between NAIs and MARIs. The visual assessment showed that MARIs had reduced motion artifacts and improved sharpness compared to MAIs.

CONCLUSION

The learning model in this study is indicated to be reduced motion artifacts without decreasing the sharpness of liver MR images.

Low-dose liver CT: image quality and diagnostic accuracy of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm

OBJECTIVES

To perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

KEY POINTS

• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of three MSCT for high resolution bone imaging

INTRODUCTION

Strategies for achieving high resolution varies between manufacturers. In CT, the helical mode with narrow collimation has long been considered as the gold standard for high-resolution imaging. More recently, incremental modes with small dexels and focal spot, have been developed but have not been compared with helical acquisitions under optimal conditions. The aim of this work is to compare the high-resolution acquisition strategies currently proposed by recent MSCT.

METHODS

Three CT systems were compared. A phantom was used to evaluate geometric accuracy, uniformity, scan slice geometry, and spatial resolution. Human dry bones were used to test different protocols on real bone architecture. A blind visual analysis was conducted by trained CT users for classifying the different acquisitions (p-values).

RESULTS

All systems give satisfactory results in terms of geometric accuracy and uniformity. The in-plane MTF at 5% were respectively 13.4, 15.9 and 18.1 lp/cm. Dry-bones evaluation confirms that acquisition#3 is considered as the best.

CONCLUSIONS

The incremental acquisition coupled with à small focal spot, and a high-sampling detector, overpasses the reference of low-pitch helical acquisitions for high-resolution imaging. Cortical bone, bony vessels, and tumoral matrix analysis are the very next challenges that will have to be managed to improve normal and pathologic bone imaging thanks to the availability UHR-CT systems.

Deep-learning reconstruction with low-contrast media and low-kilovoltage peak for CT of the liver

AIM

To compare images using reduced CM, low-kVp scanning and DLR reconstruction with conventional images (no CM reduction, normal tube voltage, reconstructed with HBIR. To compare images using reduced contrast media (CM), low kilovoltage peak (kVp) scanning and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) with conventional image quality (no CM reduction, normal tube voltage, reconstructed with hybrid-type iterative reconstruction method [HBIR protocol]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 70 patients with liver disease and three-phase dynamic imaging using computed tomography (CT) from April 2020 to March 2022 at Oita University Hospital. Of these cases, 39 were reconstructed using the DLR protocol at a tube voltage of 80 kVp and CM of 300 mg iodine/kg while 31 were imaged at a tube voltage of 120 kVp with CM of 600 mg iodine/kg and were reconstructed by the usual HBIR protocol. Images from the DLR and HBIR protocols were analysed and compared based on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), figure-of-merit (FOM), and visual assessment. The CT dose index (CTDI)vol and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were compared with respect to radiation dose.

RESULTS

The DLR protocol was superior, with significant differences in CNR, SNR, and FOM except hepatic parenchyma in the arterial phase. For visual assessment, the DLR protocol had better values for vascular visualisation for the portal vein, image noise, and contrast enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma. Regarding comparison of the radiation dose, the DLR protocol was superior for all values of CTDIvol and SSDE, with significant differences (p<0.01; max. 52%).

CONCLUSION

Protocols using DLR with reduced CM and low kVp have better image quality and lower radiation dose compared to protocols using conventional HBIR.

Deep learning-based algorithms for low-dose CT imaging: A review

The computed tomography (CT) technique is extensively employed as an imaging modality in clinical settings. The radiation dose of CT, however, is significantly high, thereby raising concerns regarding the potential radiation damage it may cause. The reduction of X-ray exposure dose in CT scanning may result in a significant decline in imaging quality, thereby elevating the risk of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. The reduction of CT radiation dose and acquisition of high-quality images to meet clinical diagnostic requirements have always been a critical research focus and challenge in the field of CT. Over the years, scholars have conducted extensive research on enhancing low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging algorithms, among which deep learning-based algorithms have demonstrated superior performance. In this review, we initially introduced the conventional algorithms for CT image reconstruction along with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Subsequently, we provided a detailed description of four aspects concerning the application of deep neural networks in LDCT imaging process: preprocessing in the projection domain, post-processing in the image domain, dual-domain processing imaging, and direct deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR). Furthermore, an analysis was conducted to evaluate the merits and demerits of each method. The commercial and clinical applications of the LDCT-DLR algorithm were also presented in an overview. Finally, we summarized the existing issues pertaining to LDCT-DLR and concluded the paper while outlining prospective trends for algorithmic advancement.

Value of deep learning reconstruction of chest low-dose CT for image quality improvement and lung parenchyma assessment on lung window

OBJECTIVES

To explore the performance of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for the improvement of image quality and assessment of lung parenchyma.

METHODS

Sixty patients underwent chest regular-dose CT (RDCT) followed by LDCT during the same examination. RDCT images were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and LDCT images were reconstructed with HIR and DLR, both using lung algorithm. Radiation exposure was recorded. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and subjective image quality of normal and abnormal CT features were evaluated and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

The effective radiation dose of LDCT was significantly lower than that of RDCT (0.29 ± 0.03 vs 2.05 ± 0.65 mSv, p < 0.001). The mean image noise ± standard deviation was 33.9 ± 4.7, 39.6 ± 4.3, and 31.1 ± 3.2 HU in RDCT, LDCT HIR-Strong, and LDCT DLR-Strong, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall image quality of LDCT DLR-Strong was significantly better than that of LDCT HIR-Strong (p < 0.001) and comparable to that of RDCT (p > 0.05). LDCT DLR-Strong was comparable to RDCT in evaluating solid nodules, increased attenuation, linear opacity, and airway lesions (all p > 0.05). The visualization of subsolid nodules and decreased attenuation was better with DLR than with HIR in LDCT but inferior to RDCT (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LDCT DLR can effectively reduce image noise and improve image quality. LDCT DLR provides good performance for evaluating pulmonary lesions, except for subsolid nodules and decreased lung attenuation, compared to RDCT-HIR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The study prospectively evaluated the contribution of DLR applied to chest low-dose CT for image quality improvement and lung parenchyma assessment. DLR can be used to reduce radiation dose and keep image quality for several indications.

KEY POINTS

• DLR enables LDCT maintaining image quality even with very low radiation doses. • Chest LDCT with DLR can be used to evaluate lung parenchymal lesions except for subsolid nodules and decreased lung attenuation. • Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema or subsolid nodules may require higher radiation doses.

Image Quality Improvement of Low-dose Abdominal CT using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Compared with the Second Generation Iterative Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Whether deep learning-based CT reconstruction could improve lesion conspicuity on abdominal CT when the radiation dose is reduced is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether DLIR can provide better image quality and reduce radiation dose in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT compared with the second generation of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V).

AIMS

This study aims to determine whether deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can improve image quality.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, a total of 102 patients were included, who underwent abdominal CT using a DLIR-equipped 256-row scanner and routine CT of the same protocol on the same vendor's 64-row scanner within four months. The CT data from the 256-row scanner were reconstructed into ASiR-V with three blending levels (AV30, AV60, and AV100), and DLIR images with three strength levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H). The routine CT data were reconstructed into AV30, AV60, and AV100. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the liver, overall image quality, subjective noise, lesion conspicuity, and plasticity in the portal venous phase (PVP) of ASiR-V from both scanners and DLIR were compared.

RESULTS

The mean effective radiation dose of PVP of the 256-row scanner was significantly lower than that of the routine CT (6.3±2.0 mSv vs. 2.4±0.6 mSv; p< 0.001). The mean CNR, image quality, subjective noise, and lesion conspicuity of ASiR-V images of the 256-row scanner were significantly lower than those of ASiR-V images at the same blending factor of routine CT, but significantly improved with DLIR algorithms. DLIR-H showed higher CNR, better image quality, and subjective noise than AV30 from routine CT, whereas plasticity was significantly better for AV30.

CONCLUSION

DLIR can be used for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose in abdominal CT, compared with ASIR-V.

Effectiveness of deep learning reconstruction on standard to ultra-low-dose high-definition chest CT images

PURPOSE

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced by major vendors, tested for CT examinations of a variety of organs, and compared with other reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of DLR for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation with those of hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR) for standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs (SDCT, RDCT and ULDCT) obtained with high-definition CT (HDCT) and reconstructed at 0.25-mm, 0.5-mm and 1-mm section thicknesses with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes for patients with various pulmonary diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty age-, gender- and body mass index-matched patients with various pulmonary diseases underwent SDCT (CT dose index volume : mean ± standard deviation, 9.0 ± 1.8 mGy), RDCT (CTDIvol: 1.7 ± 0.2 mGy) and ULDCT (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy) at a HDCT. All CT data set were then reconstructed with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes by means of hybrid-type IR and DLR. SNR of lung parenchyma and probabilities of all lung textures were assessed for each CT data set. SNR and detection performance of each lung texture reconstructed with DLR and hybrid-type IR were then compared by means of paired t tests and ROC analyses for all CT data at each section thickness.

RESULTS

Data for each radiation dose showed DLR attained significantly higher SNR than hybrid-type IR for each of the CT data (p < 0.0001). On assessments of all findings except consolidation and nodules or masses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for ULDCT with hybrid-type IR for each section thickness (0.91 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.97) were significantly smaller than those with DLR (0.97 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05) and the standard protocol (0.98 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DLR is potentially more effective for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation than hybrid-type IR on all radiation dose CTs obtained at HDCT and reconstructed with each section thickness with both matrixes for patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases.

Improvement of Spatial Resolution on Coronary CT Angiography by Using Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare the image quality of coronary CT angiography reconstructed with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) and with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography using a 320-detector-row CT scanner. The CT images were reconstructed with hybrid IR and SR-DLR. The standard deviation of the CT number was recorded and the CT attenuation profile across the left main coronary artery was generated to calculate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and measure the edge rise slope (ERS). Overall image quality was evaluated and plaque detectability was assessed on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). For reference, invasive coronary angiography of 14 patients was used.

RESULTS

The mean image noise on SR-DLR was significantly lower than on hybrid IR images (15.6 vs 22.9 HU; p < 0.01). The mean CNR was significantly higher and the ERS was steeper on SR-DLR- compared to hybrid IR images (CNR: 32.4 vs 20.4, p < 0.01; ERS: 300.0 vs 198.2 HU/mm, p < 0.01). The image quality score was better on SR-DLR- than on hybrid IR images (3.6 vs 3.1; p < 0.01). SR-DLR increased the detectability of plaques with < 50% stenosis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR was superior to hybrid IR with respect to the image noise, the sharpness of coronary artery margins, and plaque detectability.

Impact of a reduced iodine load with deep learning reconstruction on abdominal MDCT

To evaluate the impact of a reduced iodine load using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on the hepatic parenchyma compared to conventional iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR) and its consequence on the radiation dose and image quality. This retrospective monocentric intraindividual comparison study included 66 patients explored at the portal phase using different multidetector computed tomography parameters: Group A, hybrid IR algorithm (hybrid IR) and a nonionic low-osmolality contrast agent (350 mgI/mL); Group B, DLR algorithm (DLR) and a nonionic iso-osmolality contrast agent (270 mgI/mL). We recorded the attenuation of the liver parenchyma, image quality, and radiation dose parameters. The mean hounsfield units (HU) value of the liver parenchyma was significantly lower in group B, at 105.9 ± 10.9 HU versus 118.5 ± 14.6 HU in group A. However, the 90%IC of mean liver attenuation in the group B (DLR) was between 100.8 HU and 109.3 HU. The signal-to-noise ratio of the liver parenchyma was significantly higher on DLR images, increasing by 56%. However, for both the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and CNR liver/PV no statistical difference was found, even if the CNR liver/PV ratio was slightly higher for group A. The mean dose-length product and computed tomography dose index volume values were significantly lower with DLR, corresponding to a radiation dose reduction of 36% for the DLR. Using a DLR algorithm for abdominal multidetector computed tomography with a low iodine load can provide sufficient enhancement of the liver parenchyma up to 100 HU in addition to the advantages of a higher image quality, a better signal-to-noise ratio and a lower radiation dose.

Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the two most common commercially available deep-learning algorithms for CT.

METHODS

We used PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to conduct systematic searches for studies assessing the most common commercially available deep-learning CT reconstruction algorithms: True Fidelity (TF) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) in the abdomen of human participants since only these two algorithms currently have adequate published data for robust systematic analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. 32 studies evaluated TF and 12 studies assessed AiCE. DLR algorithms produced images with significantly less noise (22-57.3% less than IR) but preserved a desirable noise texture with increased contrast-to-noise ratios and improved lesion detectability on conventional CT. These improvements with DLR were similarly noted in dual-energy CT which was only assessed for a single vendor. Reported radiation reduction potential was 35.1-78.5%. Nine studies assessed observer performance with the two dedicated liver lesion studies being performed on the same vendor reconstruction (TF). These two studies indicate preserved low contrast liver lesion detection (> 5 mm) at CTDIvol 6.8 mGy (BMI 23.5 kg/m2) to 12.2 mGy (BMI 29 kg/m2). If smaller lesion detection and improved lesion characterization is needed, a CTDIvol of 13.6-34.9 mGy is needed in a normal weight to obese population. Mild signal loss and blurring have been reported at high DLR reconstruction strengths.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning reconstructions significantly improve image quality in CT of the abdomen. Assessment of other dose levels and clinical indications is needed. Careful choice of radiation dose levels is necessary, particularly for small liver lesion assessment.

Computed Tomography 2.0: New Detector Technology, AI, and Other Developments

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) dramatically improved the capabilities of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Starting in the early 1970s, this imaging modality is still evolving, although tremendous improvements in scan speed, volume coverage, spatial and soft tissue resolution, as well as dose reduction have been achieved. Tube current modulation, automated exposure control, anatomy-based tube voltage (kV) selection, advanced x-ray beam filtration, and iterative image reconstruction techniques improved image quality and decreased radiation exposure. Cardiac imaging triggered the demand for high temporal resolution, volume acquisition, and high pitch modes with electrocardiogram synchronization. Plaque imaging in cardiac CT as well as lung and bone imaging demand for high spatial resolution. Today, we see a transition of photon-counting detectors from experimental and research prototype setups into commercially available systems integrated in patient care. Moreover, with respect to CT technology and CT image formation, artificial intelligence is increasingly used in patient positioning, protocol adjustment, and image reconstruction, but also in image preprocessing or postprocessing. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the technical specifications of up-to-date available whole-body and dedicated CT systems, as well as hardware and software innovations for CT systems in the near future.

Improving lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT with deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study with five readers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to those using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (Asir-V) at 50% blending (AV-50), and to identify potential factors impacting lesion conspicuity.

METHODS

The portal-venous phase scans in abdominal DECT of 47 participants with 84 lesions were prospectively included. The raw data were reconstructed to virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 50 keV using filtered back-projection (FBP), AV-50, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H). A noise power spectrum (NPS) was generated. CT number and standard deviation values of eight anatomical sites were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Five radiologists assessed image quality in terms of image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability, and evaluated the lesion conspicuity.

RESULTS

DLIR further reduced image noise (p < 0.001) compared to AV-50 while better preserved the average NPS frequency (p < 0.001). DLIR maintained CT number values (p > 0.99) and improved SNR and CNR values compared to AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H and DLIR-M showed higher ratings in all image quality analyses than AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H provided significantly better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M regardless of lesion size, relative CT attenuation to surrounding tissue, or clinical purpose (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR-H could be safely recommended for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in daily contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to improve image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR is superior to AV-50 in noise reduction, with less shifts of the average spatial frequency of NPS towards low frequency, and larger improvements of NPS noise, noise peak, SNR, and CNR values. • DLIR-M and DLIR-H generate better image quality in terms of image contrast, noise, sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability than AV-50, while DLIR-H provides better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M. • DLIR-H could be safely recommended as a new standard for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to provide better lesion conspicuity and better image quality than the standard AV-50.

Application of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Dynamic Abdominal CT: Comparison with Standard-Dose CT Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Method

The purpose is to evaluate whether deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm provides sufficient image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a 30% reduction in radiation dose, compared to standard-dose CT reconstructed with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). The subjects consisted of 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with standard dose and reconstructed with hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and another 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with approximately 30% less dose and reconstructed with ASiR-V50% and DLD at low-, medium- and high-strength (DLD-L, DLD-M and DLD-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for portal vein on portal venous phase was calculated. Lesion conspicuity in 23 abdominal solid mass on the reduced-dose CT was rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). Compared with hybrid IR of standard-dose CT, DLD-H of reduced-dose CT provided significantly lower image noise (portal phase: 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.7-9.4) HU vs 12.0 (11.4-12.7) HU, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher CNR (median, 5.8 (4.4-7.4) vs 4.3 (3.3-5.3), P = 0.0019). As for DLD-M of reduced-dose CT, no significant difference was found in image noise and CNR compared to hybrid IR of standard-dose CT (P > 0.99). Lesion conspicuity scores for DLD-H and DLD-M were significantly better than hybrid IR (P < 0.05). Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquired with approximately 30% lower radiation dose and generated with the DLD algorithm exhibit lower image noise and higher CNR compared to standard-dose CT with hybrid IR.

Fast and low-dose medical imaging generation empowered by hybrid deep-learning and iterative reconstruction

Fast and low-dose reconstructions of medical images are highly desired in clinical routines. We propose a hybrid deep-learning and iterative reconstruction (hybrid DL-IR) framework and apply it for fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast positron emission tomography (PET), and low-dose computed tomography (CT) image generation tasks. First, in a retrospective MRI study (6,066 cases), we demonstrate its capability of handling 3- to 10-fold under-sampled MR data, enabling organ-level coverage with only 10- to 100-s scan time; second, a low-dose CT study (142 cases) shows that our framework can successfully alleviate the noise and streak artifacts in scans performed with only 10% radiation dose (0.61 mGy); and last, a fast whole-body PET study (131 cases) allows us to faithfully reconstruct tumor-induced lesions, including small ones (<4 mm), from 2- to 4-fold-accelerated PET acquisition (30-60 s/bp). This study offers a promising avenue for accurate and high-quality image reconstruction with broad clinical value.

Clinical Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

This study evaluated the feasibility of deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). By using a 20 cm water phantom, the noise reduction ratio and noise power spectrum were evaluated according to the different reconstruction methods. Then 46 patients who underwent CCTA were retrospectively enrolled. CCTA was performed using the 16 cm coverage axial volume scan technique. All CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP); three model-based iterative reconstructions (MBIR) of 40%, 60%, and 80%; and three DLIR algorithms: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). Quantitative and qualitative image qualities of CCTA were compared according to the reconstruction methods. In the phantom study, the noise reduction ratios of MBIR-40%, MBIR-60%, MBIR-80%, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H were 26.7 ± 0.2%, 39.5 ± 0.5%, 51.7 ± 0.4%, 33.1 ± 0.8%, 43.2 ± 0.8%, and 53.5 ± 0.1%, respectively. The pattern of the noise power spectrum of the DLIR images was more similar to FBP images than MBIR images. In a CCTA study, CCTA yielded a significantly lower noise index with DLIR-H reconstruction than with the other reconstruction methods. DLIR-H showed a higher SNR and CNR than MBIR (p < 0.05). The qualitative image quality of CCTA with DLIR-H was significantly higher than that of MBIR-80% or FBP. The DLIR algorithm was feasible and yielded a better image quality than the FBP or MBIR algorithms on CCTA.

Impact of deep learning image reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features in patients with liver tumors

Objective

To evaluate the impact of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) on abdominal CT radiomic features acquired in portal venous phase in liver tumor patients.

Methods

Sixty patients with liver tumors who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT were retrospectively enrolled. Six groups including filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V (30%, 70%) and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M and high (DLIR-H), were reconstructed using portal venous phase data. CT-based radiomic features (first-order, texture and wavelet features) were extracted from 2D and 3D liver tumors, peritumor and liver parenchyma. All features were analyzed for comparison. P &lt; 0.05 indicated statistically different. The consistency of 3D lesion feature extraction was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Different reconstruction algorithms influenced most radiomic features. The percentages of first-order, texture and wavelet features without statistical difference among 2D and 3D lesions, peritumor and liver parenchyma for all six groups were 27.78% (5/18), 5.33% (4/75) and 5.56% (1/18), respectively (all p &gt; 0.05), and they decreased while the level of reconstruction strengthened for both ASIR-V and DLIR. Compared with FBP, the features of ASIR-V30% and 70% without statistical difference decreased from 71.31% to 23.95%, and DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H decreased from 31.65% to 27.11% and 23.73%. Among texture features, unaffected features of peritumor were larger than those of lesions and liver parenchyma, and unaffected 3D lesions features were larger than those of 2D lesions. The consistency of 3D lesion first-order features was excellent, with intra- and inter-observer ICCs ranging from 0.891 to 0.999 and 0.880 to 0.998.

Conclusions

Both ASIR-V and DLIR algorithms with different strengths influenced the radiomic features of abdominal CT images in portal venous phase, and the influences aggravated as reconstruction strength increased.

CT image quality evaluation in the age of deep learning: trade-off between functionality and fidelity

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare DLIR and ASiR-V with realistic anatomical images.

METHODS

CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom were acquired using three routine protocols (brain, chest, and abdomen) at four dose levels, with images reconstructed at five levels of ASiR-V and three levels of DLIR. Noise power spectrum (NPS) was estimated using a difference image by subtracting two matching images from repeated scans. Using the max-dose FBP reconstruction as the ground truth, the structure similarity index (SSIM) and gradient magnitude (GM) of difference images were evaluated. Image noise magnitude (σ), frequency location of the NPS peak (f_peak), mean SSIM (MSSIM), and mean GM (MGM) were used as quantitative metrics to compare image quality, for each anatomical region, protocol, algorithm, dose level, and slice thickness.

RESULTS

Image noise had a strong (R² > 0.99) power law relationship with dose for all algorithms. For the abdomen and chest, f_peak shifted from 0.3 (FBP) down to 0.15 mm^-1 (ASiR-V 100%) with increasing ASiR-V strength but remained 0.3 mm^-1 for all DLIR levels. f_peak shifted down for the brain protocol with increasing DLIR levels. Three levels of DLIR produced similar image noise levels as ASiR-V 40%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. DLIR had lower MSSIM but higher MGM than ASiR-V while matching imaging noise.

CONCLUSION

Compared to ASiR-V, DLIR presents trade-offs between functionality and fidelity: it has a noise texture closer to FBP and more edge enhancement, but reduced structure similarity. These trade-offs and unique protocol-dependent behaviors of DLIR should be considered during clinical implementation and deployment.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR reconstructed images demonstrate closer noise texture and lower structure similarity to FBP while producing equivalent noise levels comparable to ASiR-V. • DLIR has additional edge enhancement as compared to ASiR-V. • DLIR has unique protocol-dependent behaviors that should be considered for clinical implementation.

First Results of a New Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Liver Metastasis Conspicuity for Abdominal Low-Dose CT

The study's aim was to assess the impact of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm (Precise Image; DLR) on image quality and liver metastasis conspicuity compared with an iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR). This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with at least one liver metastasis having been diagnosed between December 2021 and February 2022. Images were reconstructed using level 4 of the IR algorithm (i4) and the Standard/Smooth/Smoother levels of the DLR algorithm. Mean attenuation and standard deviation were measured by placing the ROIs in the fat, muscle, healthy liver, and liver tumor. Two radiologists assessed the image noise and image smoothing, overall image quality, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales. The study included 30 patients (mean age 70.4 ± 9.8 years, 17 men). The mean CTDI_vol was 6.3 ± 2.1 mGy, and the mean dose-length product 314.7 ± 105.7 mGy.cm. Compared with i4, the HU values were similar in the DLR algorithm at all levels for all tissues studied. For each tissue, the image noise significantly decreased with DLR compared with i4 (p < 0.01) and significantly decreased from Standard to Smooth (-26 ± 10%; p < 0.01) and from Smooth to Smoother (-37 ± 8%; p < 0.01). The subjective image assessment confirmed that the image noise significantly decreased between i4 and DLR (p < 0.01) and from the Standard to Smoother levels (p < 0.01), but the opposite occurred for the image smoothing. The highest scores for overall image quality and conspicuity were found for the Smooth and Smoother levels.

Low dose of contrast agent and low radiation liver computed tomography with deep-learning-based contrast boosting model in participants at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the image quality and lesion conspicuity of a deep-learning-based contrast-boosting (DL-CB) algorithm on double-low-dose (DLD) CT of simultaneous reduction of radiation and contrast doses in participants at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Participants were recruited and underwent four-phase dynamic CT (NCT04722120). They were randomly assigned to either standard-dose (SD) or DLD protocol. All CT images were initially reconstructed using iterative reconstruction, and the images of the DLD protocol were further processed using the DL-CB algorithm (DLD-DL). The primary endpoint was the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the secondary endpoint was qualitative image quality (noise, hepatic lesion, and vessel conspicuity), and the tertiary endpoint was lesion detection rate. The t-test or repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight participants with 57 focal liver lesions were enrolled (20 with HCC and 37 with benign findings). The DLD protocol had a 19.8% lower radiation dose (DLP, 855.1 ± 254.8 mGy·cm vs. 713.3 ± 94.6 mGy·cm, p = .003) and 27% lower contrast dose (106.9 ± 15.0 mL vs. 77.9 ± 9.4 mL, p < .001) than the SD protocol. The comparative analysis demonstrated that CNR (p < .001) and portal vein conspicuity (p = .002) were significantly higher in the DLD-DL than in the SD protocol. There was no significant difference in lesion detection rate for all lesions (82.7% vs. 73.3%, p = .140) and HCCs (75.7% vs. 70.4%, p = .644) between the SD protocol and DLD-DL.

CONCLUSIONS

DL-CB on double-low-dose CT provided improved CNR of the aorta and portal vein without significant impairment of the detection rate of HCC compared to the standard-dose acquisition, even in participants at high risk for HCC.

KEY POINTS

• Deep-learning-based contrast-boosting algorithm on double-low-dose CT provided an improved contrast-to-noise ratio compared to standard-dose CT. • The detection rate of focal liver lesions was not significantly differed between standard-dose CT and a deep-learning-based contrast-boosting algorithm on double-low-dose CT. • Double-low-dose CT without a deep-learning algorithm presented lower CNR and worse image quality.

Deep Learning Denoising of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Chest Images: A Quantitative and Qualitative Image Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess deep learning denoised (DLD) computed tomography (CT) chest images at various low doses by both quantitative and qualitative perceptual image analysis.

METHODS

Simulated noise was inserted into sinogram data from 32 chest CTs acquired at 100 mAs, generating anatomically registered images at 40, 20, 10, and 5 mAs. A DLD model was developed, with 23 scans selected for training, 5 for validation, and 4 for test.Quantitative analysis of perceptual image quality was assessed with Structural SIMilarity Index (SSIM) and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID). Four thoracic radiologists graded overall diagnostic image quality, image artifact, visibility of small structures, and lesion conspicuity. Noise-simulated and denoised image series were evaluated in comparison with one another, and in comparison with standard 100 mAs acquisition at the 4 mAs levels. Statistical tests were conducted at the 2-sided 5% significance level, with multiple comparison correction.

RESULTS

At the same mAs levels, SSIM and FID between noise-simulated and reconstructed DLD images indicated that images were closer to a perfect match with increasing mAs (closer to 1 for SSIM, and 0 for FID).In comparing noise-simulated and DLD images to standard-dose 100-mAs images, DLD improved SSIM and FID. Deep learning denoising improved SSIM of 40-, 20-, 10-, and 5-mAs simulations in comparison with standard-dose 100-mAs images, with change in SSIM from 0.91 to 0.94, 0.87 to 0.93, 0.67 to 0.87, and 0.54 to 0.84, respectively. Deep learning denoising improved FID of 40-, 20-, 10-, and 5-mAs simulations in comparison with standard-dose 100-mAs images, with change in FID from 20 to 13, 46 to 21, 104 to 41, and 148 to 69, respectively.Qualitative image analysis showed no significant difference in lesion conspicuity between DLD images at any mAs in comparison with 100-mAs images. Deep learning denoising images at 10 and 5 mAs were rated lower for overall diagnostic image quality ( P < 0.001), and at 5 mAs lower for overall image artifact and visibility of small structures ( P = 0.002), in comparison with 100 mAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning denoising resulted in quantitative improvements in image quality. Qualitative assessment demonstrated DLD images at or less than 10 mAs to be rated inferior to standard-dose images.

Abdominopelvic CT Image Quality: Evaluation of Thin (0.5-mm) Slices Using Deep Learning Reconstruction

BACKGROUND. Because thick-section images (typically 3-5 mm) have low image noise, radiologists typically use them to perform clinical interpretation, although they may additionally refer to thin-section images (typically 0.5-0.625 mm) for problem solving. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can yield thin-section images with low noise. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare abdominopelvic CT image quality between thin-section DLR images and thin- and thick-section hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) images. METHODS. This retrospective study included 50 patients (31 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years) who underwent abdominopelvic CT between June 15, 2020, and July 29, 2020. Images were reconstructed at 0.5-mm section using DLR and at 0.5-mm and 3.0-mm sections using HIR. Five radiologists independently performed pairwise comparisons (0.5-mm DLR and either 0.5-mm or 3.0-mm HIR) and recorded the preferred image for subjective image quality measures (scale, -2 to 2). The pooled scores of readers were compared with a score of 0 (denoting no preference). Image noise was quantified using the SD of ROIs on regions of homogeneous liver. RESULTS. For comparison of 0.5-mm DLR images and 0.5-mm HIR images, the median pooled score was 2 (indicating a definite preference for DLR) for noise and overall image quality and 1 (denoting a slight preference for DLR) for sharpness and natural appearance. For comparison of 0.5-mm DLR and 3.0-mm HIR, the median pooled score was 1 for the four previously mentioned measures. These assessments were all significantly different (p < .001) from 0. For artifacts, the median pooled score for both comparisons was 0, which was not significant for comparison with 3.0-mm HIR (p = .03) but was significant for comparison with 0.5-mm HIR (p < .001) due to imbalance in scores of 1 (n = 28) and -1 (slight preference for HIR, n = 1). Noise for 0.5-mm DLR was lower by mean differences of 12.8 HU compared with 0.5-mm HIR and 4.4 HU compared with 3.0-mm HIR (both p < .001). CONCLUSION. Thin-section DLR improves subjective image quality and reduces image noise compared with currently used thin- and thick-section HIR, without causing additional artifacts. CLINICAL IMPACT. Although further diagnostic performance studies are warranted, the findings suggest the possibility of replacing current use of both thin- and thick-section HIR with the use of thin-section DLR only during clinical interpretations.

Improving image quality with deep learning image reconstruction in double-low-dose head CT angiography compared with standard dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate similar image quality with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in reduced contrast medium (CM) and radiation dose (double-low-dose) head CT angiography (CTA), in comparison with standard-dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V).

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 63 patients who under head CTA using 256-slice CT. Patients were randomized into either the standard-dose group (n = 38) with 40 ml of Iopromide (370 mgI ml-1 at 4.5 ml s-1); or a double-low-dose group (n = 25) with CM of 25 ml at 3.0 ml s-1. For image reconstruction, the double-low-dose group used DLIR-M and DLIR-H strength, and the standard-dose group used ASIR-V with 50% strength. The CT value and standard deviation, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of posterior fossa, neck muscles, carotid, vertebral and middle cerebral arteries were measured. The image noise, vessel edge and structure blurring and overall image quality were assessed by using a 5-grade method. The double-low-dose group reduced CM dose by 37.5% and CT dose index by 41% compared with the standard-dose group. DLIR further reduced the standard deviation value of the middle cerebral artery and posterior fossa and provided better overall subjective image quality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduces image noise and provides higher overall image quality in the double-low-dose CTA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

It is feasible to reduce CM dose by 37.5% and volume CT dose index by 41% with the combination of 80 kVp and DLIR in head CTA. Compared with ASIR-V, DLIR further reduces image noise and achieves better image quality with reduced contrast and radiation dose.

Evaluation of thin-slice abdominal DECT using deep-learning image reconstruction in 74 keV virtual monoenergetic images: an image quality comparison

PURPOSE

To compare noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) vs. adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in 0.625 and 2.5 mm slice thickness gray scale 74 keV virtual monoenergetic (VM) abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT).

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and regional ethics committee. We analysed 30 portal-venous phase abdominal fast kV-switching DECT (80/140kVp) scans. Data were reconstructed to ASIR-V 60% and DLIR-High at 74 keV in 0.625 and 2.5 mm slice thickness. Quantitative HU and noise assessment were measured within liver, aorta, adipose tissue and muscle. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated image noise, sharpness, texture and overall quality based on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

DLIR significantly reduced image noise and increased CNR as well as SNR compared to ASIR-V, when slice thickness was maintained (p < 0.001). Slightly higher noise of 5.5-16.2% was measured (p < 0.01) in liver, aorta and muscle tissue at 0.625 mm DLIR compared to 2.5 mm ASIR-V, while noise in adipose tissue was 4.3% lower with 0.625 mm DLIR compared to 2.5 mm ASIR-V (p = 0.08). Qualitative assessments demonstrated significantly improved image quality for DLIR particularly in 0.625 mm images.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR significantly reduced image noise, increased CNR and SNR and improved image quality in 0.625 mm slice images, when compared to ASIR-V. DLIR may facilitate thinner image slice reconstructions for routine contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT.

Image quality comparison of lower extremity CTA between CT routine reconstruction algorithms and deep learning reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the image quality of lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) compared to model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), hybrid-iterative reconstruction (HIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).

METHODS

Fifty patients (38 males, average age 59.8 ± 19.2 years) who underwent lower extremity CTA between January and May 2021 were included. Images were reconstructed with DLR, MBIR, HIR, and FBP. The standard deviation (SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise power spectrum (NPS) curves, and the blur effect, were calculated. The subjective image quality was independently evaluated by two radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy of DLR, MBIR, HIR, and FBP reconstruction algorithms was calculated.

RESULTS

The CNR and SNR were significantly higher in DLR images than in the other three reconstruction algorithms, and the SD was significantly lower in DLR images of the soft tissues. The noise magnitude was the lowest with DLR. The NPS average spatial frequency (f_av) values were higher using DLR than HIR. For blur effect evaluation, DLR and FBP were similar for soft tissues and the popliteal artery, which was better than HIR and worse than MBIR. In the aorta and femoral arteries, the blur effect of DLR was worse than MBIR and FBP and better than HIR. The subjective image quality score of DLR was the highest. The sensitivity and specificity of the lower extremity CTA with DLR were the highest in the four reconstruction algorithms with 98.4% and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the other three reconstruction algorithms, DLR showed better objective and subjective image quality. The blur effect of the DLR was better than that of the HIR. The diagnostic accuracy of lower extremity CTA with DLR was the best among the four reconstruction algorithms.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm reduces image noise while alters radiomics features in dual-energy CT in comparison with conventional iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality between a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm and conventional iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in dual-energy CT (DECT) and to assess the impact of these algorithms on radiomics robustness.

METHODS

A phantom with clinical-relevant densities was imaged on seven DECT scanners with the same voxel size using typical abdominal-pelvis examination protocols. On one DECT scanner, raw data were reconstructed using both conventional IR (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V, ASIR-V) and DLIR. Nine sets of corresponding images were generated on other six DECT scanners using scanner-equipped conventional IR. Regions of interest were delineated through rigid registrations. Image quality was compared. Pyradiomics platform was used for radiomics feature extraction. Test-retest repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis for repeated scans. Inter-reconstruction algorithm reproducibility between conventional IR and DLIR was tested by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-scanner reproducibility was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD). Robust features were identified.

RESULTS

DLIR significantly improved image quality. Ninety-four radiomics features were extracted and nine features were considered as robust. 93.87% features were repeatable between repeated scans. ASIR-V images showed higher reproducibility to other conventional IR than DLIR (ICC mean, 0.603 vs 0.558, p = 0.001; CCC mean, 0.554 vs 0.510, p = 0.004). 7.45% and 26.83% features were reproducible among scanners evaluated by CV and QCD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR improves quality of DECT images but may alter radiomics features compared to conventional IR. Nine robust DECT radiomics features were identified.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR improves DECT image quality in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio compared with ASIR-V and showed the highest noise reduction rate and lowest peak frequency shift. • Most of radiomics features are repeatable between repeated DECT scans, while inter-reconstruction algorithm reproducibility between conventional IR and DLIR, and inter-scanner reproducibility, are low. • Although DLIR may alter radiomics features compared to IR algorithms, nine radiomics features survived repeatability and reproducibility analysis among DECT scanners and reconstruction algorithms, which allows further validation and clinical-relevant analysis.

Deep learning image reconstruction to improve accuracy of iodine quantification and image quality in dual-energy CT of the abdomen: a phantom and clinical study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the accuracy of iodine quantification and image quality of dual-energy CT (DECT) compared to that of other reconstruction algorithms in a phantom experiment and an abdominal clinical study.

METHODS

An elliptical phantom with five different iodine concentrations (1-12 mgI/mL) was imaged five times with fast-kilovoltage-switching DECT for three target volume CT dose indexes. All images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection, iterative reconstruction (two levels), and DLIR algorithms. Measured and nominal iodine concentrations were compared among the algorithms. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen with the same scanner was acquired in clinical patients. In arterial and portal venous phase images, iodine concentration, image noise, and coefficients of variation for four locations were retrospectively compared among the algorithms. One-way repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in the iodine concentrations, standard deviations, coefficients of variation, and percentages of error among the algorithms.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, the measured iodine concentrations were equivalent among the algorithms: within ± 8% of the nominal values, with root-mean-square deviations of 0.08-0.36 mgI/mL, regardless of radiation dose. In the clinical study (50 patients; 35 men; mean age, 68 ± 11 years), iodine concentrations were equivalent among the algorithms for each location (all p > .99). Image noise and coefficients of variation were lower with DLIR than with the other algorithms (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The DLIR algorithm reduced image noise and variability of iodine concentration values compared with other reconstruction algorithms in the fast-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT.

KEY POINTS

• In the phantom study, standard deviations and coefficients of variation in iodine quantification were lower on images with the deep learning image reconstruction algorithm than on those with other algorithms. • In the clinical study, iodine concentrations of measurement location in the upper abdomen were consistent across four reconstruction algorithms, while image noise and variability of iodine concentrations were lower on images with the deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.

"Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels"

PURPOSE

To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose⁴ (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose- and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose⁴ TTFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose⁴; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.

Artificial intelligence-based full aortic CT angiography imaging with ultra-low-dose contrast medium: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

To further reduce the contrast medium (CM) dose of full aortic CT angiography (ACTA) imaging using the augmented cycle-consistent adversarial framework (Au-CycleGAN) algorithm.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 150 consecutive patients with suspected aortic disease. All received ACTA scans of ultra-low-dose CM (ULDCM) protocol and low-dose CM (LDCM) protocol. These data were randomly assigned to the training datasets (n = 100) and the validation datasets (n = 50). The ULDCM images were reconstructed by the Au-CycleGAN algorithm. Then, the AI-based ULDCM images were compared with LDCM images in terms of image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The mean image quality score of each location in the AI-based ULDCM group was higher than that in the ULDCM group but a little lower than that in the LDCM group (all p < 0.05). All AI-based ULDCM images met the diagnostic requirements (score ≥ 3). Except for the image noise, the AI-based ULDCM images had higher attenuation value than the ULDCM and LDCM images as well as higher SNR and CNR in all locations of the aorta analyzed (all p < 0.05). Similar results were also seen in obese patients (BMI > 25, all p < 0.05). Using the findings of LDCM images as the reference, the AI-based ULDCM images showed good diagnostic parameters and no significant differences in any of the analyzed aortic disease diagnoses (all K-values > 0.80, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The required dose of CM for full ACTA imaging can be reduced to one-third of the CM dose of the LDCM protocol while maintaining image quality and diagnostic accuracy using the Au-CycleGAN algorithm.

KEY POINTS

• The required dose of contrast medium (CM) for full ACTA imaging can be reduced to one-third of the CM dose of the low-dose contrast medium (LDCM) protocol using the Au-CycleGAN algorithm. • Except for the image noise, the AI-based ultra-low-dose contrast medium (ULDCM) images had better quantitative image quality parameters than the ULDCM and LDCM images. • No significant diagnostic differences were noted between the AI-based ULDCM and LDCM images regarding all the analyzed aortic disease diagnoses.

Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Radiology: Where Are We Going?

Emergency Radiology is a unique branch of imaging, as rapidity in the diagnosis and management of different pathologies is essential to saving patients' lives. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has many potential applications in emergency radiology: firstly, image acquisition can be facilitated by reducing acquisition times through automatic positioning and minimizing artifacts with AI-based reconstruction systems to optimize image quality, even in critical patients; secondly, it enables an efficient workflow (AI algorithms integrated with RIS-PACS workflow), by analyzing the characteristics and images of patients, detecting high-priority examinations and patients with emergent critical findings. Different machine and deep learning algorithms have been trained for the automated detection of different types of emergency disorders (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, bone fractures, pneumonia), to help radiologists to detect relevant findings. AI-based smart reporting, summarizing patients' clinical data, and analyzing the grading of the imaging abnormalities, can provide an objective indicator of the disease's severity, resulting in quick and optimized treatment planning. In this review, we provide an overview of the different AI tools available in emergency radiology, to keep radiologists up to date on the current technological evolution in this field.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance

Objectives

To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V).

Methods

Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups.

Results

The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction.

Multivendor Comparison of Quantification Accuracy of Iodine Concentration and Attenuation Measurements by Dual-Energy CT: A Phantom Study

BACKGROUND. Studies comparing accuracy of quantification by dual-energy CT (DECT) scanners have been limited by small numbers of scanners evaluated and narrow ranges of scanning conditions. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare DECT scanners of varying vendors, technologies, and generations in terms of the accuracy of iodine concentration and attenuation measurements. METHODS. A DECT quality-control phantom was designed to contain seven inserts of varying iodine concentrations as well as soft-tissue and fat inserts. The phantom underwent DECT using 12 different scanner configurations based on seven different DECT scanners from three vendors, with additional variation in tube voltage settings. Technologies included rapid-switching, dual-source, and dual-layer detector DECT. Scans also used three radiation dose levels (10, 20, and 30 mGy) and multiple reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection, medium and high iterative reconstruction, and deep learning image reconstruction [DLIR]). The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE, representing the absolute ratio of measured error to nominal values on average; lower values indicate better accuracy) was calculated for iodine concentration on iodine maps (MAPE_iodine) and attenuation on virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) using 40, 70, 100, and 140 keV (MAPE_HU). Linear mixed models were used to explore factors affecting quantification accuracy. RESULTS. MAPE_iodine and MAPE_HU ranged 4.62-28.55% and 10.21-26.33%, respectively, across scanner configurations. Accuracies of iodine concentration and attenuation measurements were higher for third-generation rapid-switching and dual-source scanners in comparison with respective earlier-generation scanners and the single evaluated dual-layer detector scanner. Among all configurations, the third-generation rapid-switching scanner using DLIR had the highest quantification accuracy for iodine concentration (MAPE_iodine, 4.62% ± 3.87%) and attenuation (MAPE_HU, 10.21% ± 11.43%). Overall, MAPE_iodine was significantly affected by scanner configuration (F = 450.0, p < .001) and iodine concentration (F = 211.0, p < .001). Overall, MAPE_HU was significantly affected by scanner configuration (F = 233.5, p < .001), radiation dose (F = 14.9, p < .001), VMI energy level (F = 1959.4, p < .001), and material density (F = 411.5, p < .001); radiation dose was significantly associated with MAPE_HU for five of 12 individual configurations. CONCLUSION. Quantification accuracy varied among DECT configurations of varying vendors, platforms, and generations and was affected by acquisition and reconstruction parameters. DLIR may improve quantification accuracy. CLINICAL IMPACT. The interscanner differences in DECT-based measurements should be recognized when quantitative evaluation is performed by DECT in clinical practice.

Cardiac CTA image quality of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V versus deep learning reconstruction "TrueFidelity" in children with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have reported that deep learning reconstruction "TrueFidelity" (TF) improves computed tomography (CT) image quality. However, no study has compared adaptive statistical repeated reconstruction (ASIR-V) using TF in pediatric cardiac CT angiography (CTA) with a low peak kilovoltage.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether ASIR-V or TF CTA image quality is superior in children with congenital heart disease (CHD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty children (median age, 2 months; interquartile range, 0-5 months; 28 men) with CHD who underwent CTA were enrolled between June and September 2020. Images were reconstructed using 2 ASIR-V blending factors (80% and 100% [AV-100]) and 3 TF settings (low, medium, and high [TF-H] strength levels). For the quantitative analyses, 3 objective image qualities (attenuation, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]) were measured of the great vessels and heart chambers. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was also evaluated between the left ventricle and the dial wall. For the qualitative analyses, the degree of quantum mottle and blurring at the upper level to the first branch of the main pulmonary artery was assessed independently by 2 radiologists.

RESULTS

When the ASIR-V blending factor level and TF strength were higher, the noise was lower, and the SNR was higher. The image noise and SNR of TF-H were significantly lower and higher than those of AV-100 (P < .01), except for noise in the right atrium and left pulmonary artery and SNR of the right ventricle. Regarding CNR, TF-H was significantly better than AV-100 (P < .01). In addition, in the objective assessment of the degree of quantum mottle and blurring, TF-H had the best score among all examined image sets (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

TF-H is superior to AV-100 in terms of objective and subjective image quality. Consequently, TF-H was the best image set for cardiac CTA in children with CHD.

Intraindividual evaluation of effects of image filter function on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography

Objectives

To evaluate whether applying image filters (smooth 3D+ and edge-2) improves image quality in coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Methods

Ninety patients (routine group) with suspected coronary artery diseases based on 16-cm wide coverage detector CT findings were retrospectively enrolled at a chest pain center from December 2019 to September 2021. Two image filters, smooth 3D+ and edge-2 available on the Advantage Workstation (AW) were subsequently applied to the images to generate the research group (SE group). Quantitative parameters, including CT value, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image sharpness and image quality score, and diagnostic accuracy were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 900 segments from 270 coronary arteries in 90 patients were analyzed. SNR, CNR, and image sharpness for vessels and image quality scores in the SE group were significantly better than those in the routine group (all p < 0.001). The SE group showed a slightly higher negative predictive value (NPV) on the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis evaluations, as well as total NPV. The SE group also showed slightly higher sensitivity and accuracy than the routine group on RCA stenosis evaluation.

Conclusion

The use of an image filter combining smooth 3D+ and edge-2 on an AW could improve the image quality of CCTA and increase radiologists' diagnostic confidence.

Deep learning-based reconstruction on cardiac CT yields distinct radiomic features compared to iterative and filtered back projection reconstructions

We aimed to determine the effects of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on radiomic features obtained from cardiac computed tomography (CT) by comparing with iterative reconstruction (IR), and filtered back projection (FBP). A total of 284 consecutive patients with 285 cardiac CT scans that were reconstructed with DLR, IR, and FBP, were retrospectively enrolled. Radiomic features were extracted from the left ventricular (LV) myocardium, and from the periprosthetic mass if patients had cardiac valve replacement. Radiomic features of LV myocardium from each reconstruction were compared using a fitting linear mixed model. Radiomics models were developed to diagnose periprosthetic abnormality, and the performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver characteristics curve (AUC). Most radiomic features of LV myocardium (73 of 88) were significantly different in pairwise comparisons between all three reconstruction methods (P < 0.05). The radiomics model on IR exhibited the best diagnostic performance (AUC 0.948, 95% CI 0.880-1), relative to DLR (AUC 0.873, 95% CI 0.735-1) and FBP (AUC 0.875, 95% CI 0.731-1), but these differences did not reach significance (P > 0.05). In conclusion, applying DLR to cardiac CT scans yields radiomic features distinct from those obtained with IR and FBP, implying that feature robustness is not guaranteed when applying DLR.

A Review of Deep Learning CT Reconstruction: Concepts, Limitations, and Promise in Clinical Practice

Purpose of Review

Deep Learning reconstruction (DLR) is the current state-of-the-art method for CT image formation. Comparisons to existing filter back-projection, iterative, and model-based reconstructions are now available in the literature. This review summarizes the prior reconstruction methods, introduces DLR, and then reviews recent findings from DLR from a physics and clinical perspective.

Recent Findings

DLR has been shown to allow for noise magnitude reductions relative to filtered back-projection without suffering from “plastic” or “blotchy” noise texture that was found objectionable with most iterative and model-based solutions. Clinically, early reader studies have reported increases in subjective quality scores and studies have successfully implemented DLR-enabled dose reductions.

Summary

The future of CT image reconstruction is bright; deep learning methods have only started to tackle problems in this space via addressing noise reduction. Artifact mitigation and spectral applications likely be future candidates for DLR applications.

Quantitative and qualitative assessments of deep learning image reconstruction in low-keV virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a novel deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) technique for dual-energy CT (DECT) derived virtual monoenergetic (VM) images compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in low kiloelectron volt (keV) images.

METHODS

We analyzed 30 venous phase acute abdominal DECT (80/140 kVp) scans. Data were reconstructed to ASIR-V and DLIR-High at four different keV levels (40, 50, 74, and 100) with 1- and 3-mm slice thickness. Quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) and noise assessment were measured within the liver, aorta, fat, and muscle. Subjective assessment of image noise, sharpness, texture, and overall quality was performed by two board-certified radiologists.

RESULTS

DLIR reduced image noise by 19.9-35.5% (p < 0.001) compared to ASIR-V in all reconstructions at identical keV levels. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) increased by 49.2-53.2% (p < 0.001) in DLIR 40-keV images compared to ASIR-V 50 keV, while no significant difference in noise was identified except for 1 and 3 mm in aorta and for 1-mm liver measurements, where ASIR-V 50 keV showed 5.5-6.8% (p < 0.002) lower noise levels. Qualitative assessment demonstrated significant improvement particularly in 1-mm reconstructions (p < 0.001). Lastly, DLIR 40 keV demonstrated comparable or improved image quality ratings when compared to ASIR-V 50 keV (p < 0.001 to 0.22).

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared to ASIR-V. Qualitative assessment showed that DLIR significantly improved image quality particularly in thin sliced images. DLIR may facilitate 40 keV as a new standard for routine low-keV VM reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR enables 40 keV as the routine low-keV VM reconstruction. • DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared to ASIR-V, across a wide range of keV levels in VM DECT images. • In low-keV VM reconstructions, improvements in image quality using DLIR were most evident and consistent in 1-mm sliced images.

Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT

Objective

To compare a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for pediatric abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.

Materials and Methods

Post-contrast abdominopelvic CT scans obtained from 120 pediatric patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 8.7 ± 5.2 years; 60 males) between May 2020 and October 2020 were evaluated in this retrospective study. Images were reconstructed using FBP, a hybrid IR algorithm (ASiR-V) with blending factors of 50% and 100% (AV50 and AV100, respectively), and a DLR algorithm (TrueFidelity) with three strength levels (low, medium, and high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise distance (ERD) were used to evaluate noise characteristics and spatial resolution, respectively. Image noise, edge definition, overall image quality, lesion detectability and conspicuity, and artifacts were qualitatively scored by two pediatric radiologists, and the scores of the two reviewers were averaged. A repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare NPS and ERD among the six reconstruction methods. The Friedman rank sum test followed by the Nemenyi-Wilcoxon-Wilcox all-pairs test was used to compare the results of the qualitative visual analysis among the six reconstruction methods.

Results

The NPS noise magnitude of AV100 was significantly lower than that of the DLR, whereas the NPS peak of AV100 was significantly higher than that of the high- and medium-strength DLR (p < 0.001). The NPS average spatial frequencies were higher for DLR than for ASiR-V (p < 0.001). ERD was shorter with DLR than with ASiR-V and FBP (p < 0.001). Qualitative visual analysis revealed better overall image quality with high-strength DLR than with ASiR-V (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

For pediatric abdominopelvic CT, the DLR algorithm may provide improved noise characteristics and better spatial resolution than the hybrid IR algorithm.

Deep learning-based reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images of kVp-switching dual energy CT for evaluation of hypervascular liver lesions: Comparison with standard reconstruction technique

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical applicability of deep learning(DL)-based reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images(VMIs) of arterial phase liver CT obtained by rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT for evaluation of hypervascular liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 109 patients who had available late arterial phase liver CT images of the liver obtained with a rapid switching kVp DECT scanner for suspicious intra-abdominal malignancies. Two VMIs of 70 keV and 40 keV were reconstructed using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) for arterial phase scans. VMIs at 40 keV were additionally reconstructed with a vendor-agnostic DL-based reconstruction technique (ClariCT.AI, ClariPi, DL 40 keV). Qualitative, quantitative image quality and subjective diagnostic acceptability were compared according to reconstruction techniques.

RESULTS

In qualitative analysis, DL 40 keV images showed less image noise (4.55 vs 3.11 vs 3.95, p < 0.001), better image sharpness (4.75 vs 4.16 vs 4.3, p < 0.001), better image contrast (4.98 vs 4.72 vs 4.19, p < 0.017), better lesion conspicuity (4.61 vs 4.23 vs 3.4, p < 0.001) and diagnostic acceptability (4.59 vs 3.88 vs 4.09, p < 0.001) compared with ASiR-V 40 keV or 70 keV image sets. In quantitative analysis, DL 40 keV significantly reduced image noise relative to ASiR-V 40 keV images (49.9%, p < 0.001) and ASiR-V 70 keV images (85.2%, p = 0.012). DL 40 keV images showed significantly higher CNR_{lesion to the liver} and SNR_liver than ASiR-V 40 keV image and 70 keV images (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DL-based reconstruction of 40 keV images using vendor-agnostic software showed greater noise reduction, better lesion conspicuity, image contrast, image sharpness, and higher overall image diagnostic acceptability than ASiR for 40 keV or 70 keV images in patients with hypervascular liver lesions.

Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT

We aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of a routine-dose protocol reconstructed with hybrid-iterative reconstruction. This retrospective study enrolled 71 patients [61 men; average age, 71.9 years; mean body mass index (BMI), 24.3 kg/m2] who underwent both low-dose abdominal CT with DLR [advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE)] and routine-dose abdominal CT with hybrid-iterative reconstruction [adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)]. Radiation dose parameters included volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Image noise was measured in the hepatic parenchyma and bilateral erector spinae muscles. Moreover, subjective assessment of perceived image quality and diagnostic acceptability was performed. The low-dose protocol helped reduce the CTDIvol by 44.3%, ED by 43.7%, and SSDE by 44.9%. Moreover, the noise was significantly lower and CNR significantly higher with the low-dose protocol than with the normal-dose protocol (P<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, there was no significant difference between the protocols with regard to image noise. Overall, AiCE was superior to AIDR 3D in terms of diagnostic acceptability (P=0.001). The use of AiCE can reduce overall radiation dose by more than 40% without loss of image quality compared to routine-dose abdominal CT with AIDR 3D.

Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

Purpose:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Artificial intelligence in functional imaging of the lung

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the way we perform advanced imaging. From high-resolution image reconstruction to predicting functional response from clinically acquired data, AI is promising to revolutionize clinical evaluation of lung performance, pushing the boundary in pulmonary functional imaging for patients suffering from respiratory conditions. In this review, we overview the current developments and expound on some of the encouraging new frontiers. We focus on the recent advances in machine learning and deep learning that enable reconstructing images, quantitating, and predicting functional responses of the lung. Finally, we shed light on the potential opportunities and challenges ahead in adopting AI for functional lung imaging in clinical settings.

Unenhanced abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with deep learning-based image reconstruction: image quality and anatomical structure depiction

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in unenhanced abdominal low-dose CT (LDCT).

Materials and methods

Two patient groups were included in this prospective study: 58 consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal standard-dose CT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (SDCT group) and 48 consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal LDCT reconstructed with high strength level of DLIR (LDCT group). The background noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, and portal vein were calculated. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed the overall image noise, overall image quality, and abdominal anatomical structures depiction. Quantitative and qualitative parameters and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were compared between SDCT and LDCT groups.

Results

The background noise was lower in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P = 0.02). SNRs were higher in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001–0.004) except for the liver. Overall image noise was superior in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001). Overall image quality was not different between SDCT and LDCT groups (P = 0.25–0.26). Depiction of almost all abdominal anatomical structures was equal to or better in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001–0.88). The SSDE was lower in LDCT group (4.0 mGy) than in SDCT group (20.6 mGy) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

DLIR facilitates substantial radiation dose reduction of > 75% and significantly reduces background noise. DLIR can maintain image quality and anatomical structure depiction in unenhanced abdominal LDCT.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to improve the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the abdomen, compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

This study included 40 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the abdomen. Virtual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV and iodine density images were reconstructed using three reconstruction algorithms, including hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity) at medium- and high-strength level (DLIR-M and DLIR-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the portal vein on portal venous phase CT was calculated. The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality were graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The comparative scale of lesion conspicuity in 47 abdominal solid lesions was evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior).

RESULTS

The image noise of virtual monochromatic 40-, 50 -, and 70-keV and iodine density images was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The CNR was significantly higher in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality scores were also significantly greater in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.05). The lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H were significantly higher than those for hybrid IR in the virtual monochromatic image of all energy levels (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR improves vessel conspicuity, CNR, and lesion conspicuity of virtual monochromatic and iodine density images in abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT, compared to hybrid IR.

KEY POINTS

• Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is useful for reducing image noise and improving the CNR of visual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV images in dual-energy CT. • DLIR can improve lesion conspicuity of abdominal solid lesions on virtual monochromatic images compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction. • DLIR can also be applied to iodine density maps and significantly improves their image quality.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography enterography with model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric Crohn's disease patients

This study assessed the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in determining disease activity of the terminal ileum of the reduced-dose computed tomography enterography using model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Eighteen patients were prospectively enrolled and allocated to the standard-dose (SD) and reduced-dose (RD) computed tomography enterography (CTE) groups (n = 9 per group). Image quality, reader confidence in interpreting bowel findings, accuracy in determining active CD in the terminal ileum, and radiation dose were evaluated. Objective image quality did not show intergroup differences, except for image sharpness. Although reader confidence in detecting mural stratification, ulcer, and perienteric fat stranding of the RD-CTE were inferior to SD-CTE, RD-CTE correctly diagnosed active disease in all patients. The mean values of radiation dose metrics (SD-CTE vs. RD-CTE) were 4.3 versus 0.74 mGy, 6.1 versus 1.1 mGy, 211.9 versus 34.5 mGy∙cm, and 4.4 versus 0.7 mSv mGy∙cm for CTDI_vol, size-specific dose estimation, dose-length product, and effective dose, respectively. RD-CTE showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to SD-CTE in determining active disease of the terminal ileum in pediatric CD patients. However, image quality and reader confidence in detecting ulcer and perienteric fat stranding was compromised.