Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) regional nodal disease at standard lymphadenectomy: is MRI accurate for identifying node-positive patients?

What is the optimal surgical approach for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic neck? - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The appropriate surgical approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is determined by the tumor's relation to the porto-mesenteric axis. Although the extent and location of lymphadenectomy is dependent on the type of resection, a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy (DP), or total pancreatectomy (TP) are considered equivalent oncologic operations for pancreatic neck tumors. Therefore, we aimed to assess differences in histopathological and oncological outcomes for surgical approaches in the treatment of pancreatic neck tumors.

METHODS

Patients with resected PDAC located in the pancreatic neck were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Furthermore, patients with 90-day mortality and R2-resections were excluded from the multivariable Cox-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 846 patients, 58% underwent PD, 25% DP, and 17% TP with similar R0-resection rates (p = 0.722). Significant differences were observed in nodal positivity (PD:44%, DP:34%, TP:57%, p < 0.001) and mean-number of examined lymph nodes (PD:17.2 ± 10.4, DP:14.7 ± 10.5, TP:21.2 ± 11.0, p < 0.001). Furthermore, inadequate lymphadenectomy (< 12 nodes) was observed in 30%, 44%, and 19% of patients undergoing PD, DP, and TP, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis yielded similar overall survival after DP (HR:0.83, 95%CI:0.63-1.11), while TP was associated with worse survival (HR:1.43, 95%CI:1.08-1.89) compared to PD.

CONCLUSION

While R0-rates are similar amongst all approaches, DP is associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy which may result in understaging disease. However, this had no negative influence on survival. In the premise that an oncological resection of the pancreatic neck tumor is feasible with a partial pancreatectomy, no benefit is observed by performing a TP.

Impact of pre-operative abdominal MRI on survival for patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma: a population-based study

Background

This study determined the impact of pre-operative abdominal MRI on all-cause mortality for patients with resected PDAC.

Methods

All adult (≥18 years) PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 2011 and December 2022 in Ontario, Canada, were identified for this population-based cohort study (ICD-O-3 codes: C250, C251, C252, C253, C257, C258). Patient demographics, comorbidities, PDAC stage, medical and surgical management, and survival data were sourced from multiple linked provincial administrative databases at ICES. All-cause mortality was compared between patients with and without a pre-operative abdominal MRI after controlling for multiple covariates.

Findings

A cohort of 4579 patients consisted of 2432 men (53.1%) and 2147 women (46.9%) with a mean age of 65.2 years (standard deviation: 11.2 years); 2998 (65.5%) died while 1581 (34.5%) survived. Median follow-up duration post-resection was 22.4 months (interquartile range: 10.8-48.8 months), and median survival post-pancreatectomy was 25.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 24.8, 27.5). Patients who underwent a pre-operative abdominal MRI had a median survival of 33.1 months (95% CI: 30.7, 37.2) compared to 21.1 months (95% CI: 19.8, 22.6) for all others. A total of 2354/4579 (51.4%) patients underwent a pre-operative abdominal MRI, which was associated with a 17.2% (95% CI: 11.0, 23.1) decrease in the rate of all-cause mortality, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.769, 0.890).

Interpretation

Pre-operative abdominal MRI was associated with improved overall survival for PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy, possibly due to better detection of liver metastases than CT.

Funding

Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association (NOAMA) Clinical Innovation Fund.

Radiomics and deep learning models for CT pre-operative lymph node staging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic algorithms and deep learning models to preoperatively identify lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up until February 11, 2024. Two reviewers screened all papers independently for eligibility. Studies reporting the accuracy of CT-based radiomics or deep learning models for detecting LNM in PDAC, using histopathology as the reference standard, were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Overall sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

RESULTS

Four radiomics studies comprising 213 patients and four deep learning studies with 272 patients were included. The average RQS total score was 12.00 ± 3.89, corresponding to an RQS percentage of 33.33 ± 10.80, while the average METRICS score was 63.60 ± 10.88. A significant and strong positive correlation was found between RQS and METRICS (p = 0.016; r = 0.810). The pooled SE, SP, DOR, and AUC of all the studies were 0.83 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88), 0.76 (95 %CI = 0.62-0.86), 15.70 (95 %CI = 8.12-27.50) and 0.85 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88). Meta-regression analysis results indicated that neither the study type (radiomics vs deep learning) nor the dataset size of the studies had a significant effect on the DOR (p = 0.09 and p = 0.26, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Based on our meta-analysis findings, preoperative CT-based radiomics algorithms and deep learning models demonstrate favorable performance in predicting LNM in patients with PDAC, with a strong correlation between RQS and METRICS of the included studies.

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning.

Review aims and findings

This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested.

Conclusion

Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

Performance of node reporting and data system (node-RADS): a preliminary study in cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) was proposed and can be applied to lymph nodes (LNs) across all anatomical sites. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS in cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 81 cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and LN dissection were retrospectively enrolled. Node-RADS evaluations were performed by two radiologists on preoperative MRI scans for all patients, both at the LN level and patient level. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to evaluate the distribution differences in size and configuration between patients with and without LN metastasis (LNM) in various regions. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to explore the diagnostic performance of the Node-RADS score for LNM.

RESULTS

The rates of LNM in the para-aortic, common iliac, internal iliac, external iliac, and inguinal regions were 7.4%, 9.3%, 19.8%, 21.0%, and 2.5%, respectively. At the patient level, as the NODE-RADS score increased, the rate of LNM also increased, with rates of 26.1%, 29.2%, 42.9%, 80.0%, and 90.9% for Node-RADS scores 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. At the patient level, the AUCs for Node-RADS scores > 1, >2, > 3, and > 4 were 0.632, 0.752, 0.763, and 0.726, respectively. Both at the patient level and LN level, a Node-RADS score > 3 could be considered the optimal cut-off value with the best AUC and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Node-RADS is effective in predicting LNM for scores 4 to 5. However, the proportions of LNM were more than 25% at the patient level for scores 1 and 2, which does not align with the expected very low and low probability of LNM for these scores.