1
|
Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N. Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:42.e45. [PMID: 38772530 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health concern that necessitates appropriate diagnostic approaches for timely intervention. This review critically evaluates the role of liquid biopsy techniques, focusing on blood- and urine-based biomarkers, in overcoming the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. The 4Kscore test and Prostate Health Index have demonstrated efficacy in distinguishing PCa from benign conditions. Urinary biomarker tests such as PCa antigen 3, MyProstateScore, SelectMDx, and ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore test have revolutionized risk stratification and minimized unnecessary biopsies. Emerging biomarkers, including non-coding RNAs, circulating tumor DNA, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) glycosylation, offer valuable insights into PCa biology, enabling personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in non-invasive liquid biomarkers for PCa diagnosis may facilitate the stratification of patients and avoid unnecessary biopsies, particularly when PSA is in the gray area of 4 to 10 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Liu
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terracciano D, La Civita E, Athanasiou A, Liotti A, Fiorenza M, Cennamo M, Crocetto F, Tennstedt P, Schiess R, Haese A, Ferro M, Steuber T. New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index. Prostate 2022; 82:1469-1476. [PMID: 35971798 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prostate health index (PHI) and, more recently, Proclarix have been proposed as serum biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate Proclarix and PHI for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS Proclarix and PHI were measured using samples of 344 men from two different centers. All patients underwent prostate biopsy, and among those, 188 men with PCa on biopsy had an additional radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/ml. Evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) and performance at predefined cut-offs of Proclarix and PHI risk scores as well as the linear combination thereof was performed to predict csPCa. PSA density was used as an independent comparator. RESULTS The cohort median age and PSA were 65 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-71) and 5.6 (IQR: 4.3-7.2) ng/ml, respectively. CsPCa was diagnosed in 161 (47%) men based on the RP specimen. ROC analysis showed that Proclarix and PHI accurately predicted csPCa with no significant difference (AUC of 0.79 and 0.76, p = 0.378) but significantly better when compared to PSA density (AUC of 0.66, p < 0.001). When using specific cut-offs, Proclarix (cut-off 10) revealed higher specificity and positive predictive value than PHI (cut-off 27) at similar sensitivities. The combination of Proclarix and PHI provided a significant increase in the AUC (p ≤ 0.007) compared to the individual tests alone and the highest clinical benefit was achieved. CONCLUSION Results of this study show that both Proclarix and PHI accurately detect the presence of csPCa. The model combining Proclarix and PHI revealed the synergistic effect and improved the diagnostic performance of the individual tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Antonietta Liotti
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano Fiorenza
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Cennamo
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre Tennstedt
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Schiess
- Proteomedix AG, Research & Development, Zurich-Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fan Y, Mulati Y, Zhai L, Chen Y, Wang Y, Feng J, Yu W, Zhang Q. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 11:810736. [PMID: 35083157 PMCID: PMC8785217 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several active surveillance (AS) criteria have been established to screen insignificant prostate cancer (insigPCa, defined as organ confined, low grade and small volume tumors confirmed by postoperative pathology). However, their comparative diagnostic performance varies. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contemporary AS criteria and validate the absolute diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of optimal AS criteria. Methods First, we searched Pubmed and performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contemporary AS criteria and obtained a relative ranking. Then, we searched Pubmed again to perform another meta-analysis to validate the absolute DOR of the top-ranked AS criteria derived from the NMA with two endpoints: insigPCa and favorable disease (defined as organ confined, low grade tumors). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify any potential heterogeneity in the results. Publication bias was evaluated. Results Seven eligible retrospective studies with 3,336 participants were identified for the NMA. The diagnostic accuracy of AS criteria ranked from best to worst, was as follows: Epstein Criteria (EC), Yonsei criteria, Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS), University of Miami (UM), University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and University of Toronto (UT). I2 = 50.5%, and sensitivity analysis with different insigPCa definitions supported the robustness of the results. In the subsequent meta-analysis of DOR of EC, insigPCa and favorable disease were identified as endpoints in ten and twenty-two studies, respectively. The pooled DOR for insigPCa and favorable disease were 0.44 (95%CI, 0.31–0.58) and 0.66 (95%CI, 0.61–0.71), respectively. According to a subgroup analysis, the DOR for favorable disease was significantly higher in US institutions than that in other regions. No significant heterogeneity or evidence of publication bias was identified. Conclusions Among the seven AS criteria evaluated in this study, EC was optimal for positively identifying insigPCa patients. The pooled diagnostic accuracy of EC was 0.44 for insigPCa and 0.66 when a more liberal endpoint, favorable disease, was used. Systematic Review Registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], PROSPERO [CRD42020157048].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Fan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.,Department of Urology, Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Lhasa, China
| | - Yelin Mulati
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Lingyun Zhai
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuke Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Juefei Feng
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.,Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Connor LP, Ramedani S, Daneshvar M, George AK, Abreu AL, Cacciamani GE, Lebastchi AH. Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 2021; 8:354-361. [PMID: 34765443 PMCID: PMC8566361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To summarize the recent literature discussing focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Methods A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed to identify recent studies involving focal therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Results In an effort to decrease the morbidity associated with prostate cancer treatment, many urologists are turning to focal therapy as an alternative treatment option. With this approach, the cancer bearing portion of the prostate is targeted while leaving the benign tissue untouched. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard for visualization during focal therapy, but new imaging modalities such as prostate specific membrane antigen/positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced ultrasound are being investigated. Furthermore, several biomarkers, such as prostate cancer antigen 3 and prostate health index, are used in conjunction with imaging to improve risk stratification prior to focal therapy. Lastly, there are several novel technologies such as nanoparticles and transurethral devices that are under investigation for use in focal therapy. Conclusion Focal therapy is proving to be a promising option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, further study is needed to determine the true efficacy of these exciting new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke P O'Connor
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shayann Ramedani
- College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Michael Daneshvar
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Arvin K George
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou R, Feng Y, Ye J, Han Z, Liang Y, Chen Q, Xu X, Huang Y, Jia Z, Zhong W. Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival of Prostate Cancer Patients Leveraging Multiple Gene Expression Profiles in Tumor Microenvironment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:632571. [PMID: 34631510 PMCID: PMC8495167 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor-adjacent normal (TAN) tissues, which constitute tumor microenvironment and are different from healthy tissues, provide critical information at molecular levels that can be used to differentiate aggressive tumors from indolent tumors. In this study, we analyzed 52 TAN samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) prostate cancer patients and developed a 10-gene prognostic model that can accurately predict biochemical recurrence-free survival based on the profiles of these genes in TAN tissues. The predictive ability was validated using TAN samples from an independent cohort. These 10 prognostic genes in tumor microenvironment are different from the prognostic genes detected in tumor tissues, indicating distinct progression-related mechanisms in two tissue types. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the prognostic genes in tumor microenvironment were significantly enriched by p53 signaling pathway, which may represent the crosstalk tunnels between tumor and its microenvironment and pathways involving cell-to-cell contact and paracrine/endocrine signaling. The insight acquired by this study has advanced our knowledge of the potential role of tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhou
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanfa Feng
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianheng Ye
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaodong Han
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuxiang Liang
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingbiao Chen
- Affiliated Foshan Hospital of Southern Medical University, Southern Medical University, Foshan, China
| | - Xiaoming Xu
- Department of Urology, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| | - Yuhan Huang
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhenyu Jia
- Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - Weide Zhong
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manceau C, Fromont G, Beauval JB, Barret E, Brureau L, Créhange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Gauthé M, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Sargos P, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G. Biomarker in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4251. [PMID: 34503059 PMCID: PMC8428218 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) in prostate cancer (PCa) represents a curative alternative for men with localised low-risk PCa. Continuous improvement of AS patient's selection and surveillance modalities aims at reducing misclassification, simplifying modalities of surveillance and decreasing need for invasive procedures such repeated biopsies. Biomarkers represent interesting tools to evaluate PCa diagnosis and prognosis, of which many are readily available or under evaluation. The aim of this review is to investigate the biomarker performance for AS selection and patient outcome prediction. Blood, urinary and tissue biomarkers were studied and a brief description of use was proposed along with a summary of major findings. Biomarkers represent promising tools which could be part of a more tailored risk AS strategy aiming to offer personalized medicine and to individualize the treatment and monitoring of each patient. The usefulness of biomarkers has mainly been suggested for AS selection, whereas few studies have investigated their role during the monitoring phase. Randomized prospective studies dealing with imaging are needed as well as larger prospective studies with long-term follow-up and strong oncologic endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Manceau
- Department of Urology, CHU-IUC Toulouse, F-31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Gaëlle Fromont
- Department of Pathology, CHRU Tours, F-37000 Tours, France;
| | - Jean-Baptiste Beauval
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, F-31130 Quint Fonsegrives, France; (J.-B.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014 Paris, France;
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)–UMR_S 1085, F-97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France;
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, F-75005 Paris, France;
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris–Paris University–U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, F-75015 Paris, France;
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France;
| | - Mathieu Gauthé
- AP-HP Health Economics Research Unit, INSERM-UMR1153, F-75004 Paris, France;
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, F-35033 Rennes, France;
| | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 Paris, France;
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, F-33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d’Urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69002 Lyon, France;
- Equipe 2–Centre d’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY)–Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud–Université Lyon 1, F-69002 Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 Paris, France;
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, F-31130 Quint Fonsegrives, France; (J.-B.B.); (G.P.)
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, F-31000 Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pastor-Navarro B, Rubio-Briones J, Borque-Fernando Á, Esteban LM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, López-Guerrero JA. Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:6266. [PMID: 34200878 PMCID: PMC8230496 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. The diagnosis is currently based on PSA levels, which are associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Moreover, most PCas are localized tumours; hence, many patients with low-/very low-risk PCa could benefit from active surveillance (AS) programs instead of more aggressive, active treatments. Heterogeneity within inclusion criteria and follow-up strategies are the main controversial issues that AS presently faces. Many biomarkers are currently under investigation in this setting; however, none has yet demonstrated enough diagnostic ability as an independent predictor of pathological or clinical progression. This work aims to review the currently available literature on tissue, blood and urine biomarkers validated in clinical practice for the management of AS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belén Pastor-Navarro
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain;
- Príncipe Felipe Research Center (CIPF), IVO-CIPF Joint Research Unit of Cancer, 46012 Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain; (J.R.-B.); (J.L.D.-E.)
| | - Ángel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS-Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Luis M. Esteban
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Engineering School of La Almunia, University of Zaragoza, 50100 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain; (J.R.-B.); (J.L.D.-E.)
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain;
- Príncipe Felipe Research Center (CIPF), IVO-CIPF Joint Research Unit of Cancer, 46012 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia ‘San Vicente Martir’, 46001 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lage-Vickers S, Bizzotto J, Valacco MP, Sanchis P, Nemirovsky S, Labanca E, Scorticati C, Mazza O, Mitrofanova A, Navone N, Vazquez E, Cotignola J, Gueron G. The expression of YWHAZ and NDRG1 predicts aggressive outcome in human prostate cancer. Commun Biol 2021; 4:103. [PMID: 33483585 PMCID: PMC7822895 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01645-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Some prostate cancers (PCas) are histo-pathologically grouped within the same Gleason Grade (GG), but can differ significantly in outcome. Herein, we aimed at identifying molecular biomarkers that could improve risk prediction in PCa. LC ESI-MS/MS was performed on human PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissues and peptide data was integrated with omic analyses. We identified high YWHAZ and NDRG1 expression to be associated with poor PCa prognosis considering all Gleason scores (GS). YWHAZ and NDRG1 defined two subpopulations of PCa patients with high and intermediate risk of death. Multivariable analyses confirmed their independence from GS. ROC analysis unveiled that YWHAZ outperformed GS beyond 60 months post-diagnosis. The genomic analysis of PCa patients with YWHAZ amplification, or increased mRNA or protein levels, revealed significant alterations in key DNA repair genes. We hereby state the relevance of YWHAZ in PCa, showcasing its role as an independent strong predictor of aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Lage-Vickers
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Juan Bizzotto
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Maria Pia Valacco
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Pablo Sanchis
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Sergio Nemirovsky
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Estefania Labanca
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and The David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Carlos Scorticati
- Cátedra de Urología, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, C1120AAR, Argentina
| | - Osvaldo Mazza
- Cátedra de Urología, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, C1120AAR, Argentina
| | - Antonina Mitrofanova
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Rutgers School of Health Professions, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Jersey, NJ, 07101, USA
| | - Nora Navone
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and The David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elba Vazquez
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina
| | - Javier Cotignola
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina.
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina.
| | - Geraldine Gueron
- Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina.
- Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee D, Shim SR, Ahn ST, Oh MM, Moon DG, Park HS, Cheon J, Kim JW. Diagnostic Performance of the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Test in Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:402-408.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
10
|
Ferro M, De Cobelli O, Lucarelli G, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Autorino R, Musi G, Vartolomei MD, Muto M, Terracciano D. Beyond PSA: The Role of Prostate Health Index (phi). Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21041184. [PMID: 32053990 PMCID: PMC7072791 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Widespread use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in screening procedures allowed early identification of an increasing number of prostate cancers (PCas), mainly including indolent cancer. Availability of different therapeutic strategies which have a very different impact on the patient’s quality of life suggested a strong need for tools able to identify clinically significant cancer at diagnosis. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance showed very good performance in pre-biopsy diagnosis. However, it is an expensive tool and requires an experienced radiologist. In this context, a simple blood-based test is worth investigating. In this context, researchers focused their attention on the development of a laboratory test able to minimize overdiagnosis without losing the identification of aggressive tumors. Results: Recent literature data on PCa biomarkers revealed a clear tendency towards the use of panels of biomarkers or a combination of biomarkers and clinical variables. Phi, the 4Kscore, and Stockholm3 as circulating biomarkers and the Mi-prostate score, Exo DX Prostate, and Select MD-X as urinary biomarker-based tests have been developed. In this scenario, phi is worthy of attention as a noninvasive test significantly associated with aggressive PCa. Conclusions: Literature data showed that phi had good diagnostic performance to identify clinically significant (cs) PCa, suggesting that it could be a useful tool for personalized treatment decision-making. In this review, phi potentialities, limitations, and comparisons with other blood- and urinary-based tests were explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.F.); (O.D.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.F.); (O.D.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation—Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Urology, Abano Terme Hospital, 35031 Padua, Italy;
| | | | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (F.C.); (R.D.)
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (F.C.); (R.D.)
| | | | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.F.); (O.D.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Matteo Muto
- Radiotherapy Unit, “S. G. Moscati” Hospital, 83100 Avellino, Italy;
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 8031 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-8174-6361-7
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lemos AEG, Matos ADR, Ferreira LB, Gimba ERP. The long non-coding RNA PCA3: an update of its functions and clinical applications as a biomarker in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2019; 10:6589-6603. [PMID: 31762940 PMCID: PMC6859920 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is an overexpressed prostate long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), transcribed from an intronic region at the long arm of human chromosome 9q21–22. It has been described that PCA3 modulates prostate cancer (PCa) cell survival through modulating androgen receptor (AR) signaling, besides controlling the expression of several androgen responsive and cancer-related genes, including epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and those regulating gene expression and cell signaling. Also, PCA3 urine levels have been successfully used as a PCa diagnostic biomarker. In this review, we have highlighted recent findings regarding PCA3, addressing its gene structure, putative applications as a biomarker, a proposed origin of this lncRNA, roles in PCa biology and expression patterns. We also updated data regarding PCA3 interactions with cancer-related miRNAs and expression in other tissues and diseases beyond the prostate. Altogether, literature data indicate aberrant expression and dysregulated activity of PCA3, suggesting PCA3 as a promising relevant target that should be even further evaluated on its applicability for PCa detection and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Emília Goulart Lemos
- Departamento de Epidemiologia e Métodos Quantitativos em Saúde, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biomédicas - Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Aline da Rocha Matos
- Laboratório de Vírus Respiratórios e do Sarampo, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Etel Rodrigues Pereira Gimba
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biomédicas - Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Coordenação de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional do Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Departamento de Ciências da Natureza (RCN), Instituto de Humanidades e Saúde, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cantiello F, Russo GI, Kaufmann S, Cacciamani G, Crocerossa F, Ferro M, De Cobelli O, Artibani W, Cimino S, Morgia G, Damiano R, Nikolaou K, Kröger N, Stenzl A, Bedke J, Kruck S. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for patients under active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018; 22:206-220. [PMID: 30487646 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0113-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the setting of patients under active surveillance (AS) is promising. In this systematic-review we aimed to analyse the role of mpMRI in patients under AS. METHODS A comprehensive literature research for English-language original and review articles, recently published, was carried out using Medline, Scopus and Web of sciences databases until 30 October 2017. The following MeSH terms were used: 'active surveillance', 'prostate cancer', 'multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging'. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed for 3.0 T mpMRI in predicting disease re-classification. RESULTS In total, 226 studies were selected after research and after removal of duplicates. After analysis on inclusion criteria, 43 studies were identified as eligible for this systematic review with a total of 6,605 patients. The timing of MRI during follow-up of AS differed from all studies like criteria for inclusion in the AS protocol. Overall, there was a low risk of bias across all studies. The diagnostic meta-analysis for 1.5 tesla showed a sensitivity of 0.60, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.75 and a hierarchical summary receiving operating curve (HSROC) of 0.74 while for 3.0 tesla mpMRI a sensitivity of 0.81, a NPV of 0.78 and a HSROC of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the available evidence suggests that both 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla mpMRI are a valid tool to monitor progression during AS follow-up, showing good accuracy capabilities in detecting PCa re-classification. However, the modality to better define what means 'disease progression' on mpMRI must be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Department of Urology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sebastiano Cimino
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Morgia
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Nils Kröger
- Department of Urology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jens Bedke
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Kruck
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fan Y, Zhai L, Meng Y, Chen Y, Sun S, Wang H, Hu S, Shen Q, Liu Y, Li D, Feng X, He Q, Wang X, Yu W, Jin J. Contemporary Epstein Criteria with Biopsy-Naïve Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Prevent Incorrect Assignment to Active Surveillance in the PI-RADS Version 2.0 Era. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3510-3517. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6720-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
14
|
Ploussard G, de la Taille A. The role of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) in prostate cancer detection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:1013-1020. [PMID: 30016891 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1502086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) score has been the first urine assay to obtain the Food and Drug Administration approval for guiding decisions regarding additional biopsies. Different aspects of this urinary assay (diagnostic performance, prognostic value, cost/benefit balance, integration with other molecular and imaging modalities) have now been well evaluated. Areas covered: This expert review will summarize current achievements and future perspectives provided by this urine biomarker. Expert commentary: The clinical benefit of the PCA3 score, in addition to the other established factors has been demonstrated before regarding biopsy decision making in men with persistent risk of prostate cancer. Its potential prognostic value also suggests its usefulness in selecting low risk patients for active surveillance protocols, however future daily-practice changing studies are needed. Economics assessment and additional value compared with other biomolecular and imaging modalities are still under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandre de la Taille
- b Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse- Oncopole , CHU Henri Mondor , APHP, Créteil , France.,c INSERM U955 Equipe 7 , Université Paris Val-de-Marne , Créteil , France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mathieu R, Castelli C, Fardoun T, Peyronnet B, Shariat SF, Bensalah K, Vincendeau S. Cost analysis of prostate cancer detection including the prostate health index (phi). World J Urol 2018; 37:481-487. [PMID: 29980838 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2362-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the economic impact of introducing the prostate health index (phi) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. METHODS A total of 177 patients who presented in an academic institution with a tPSA between 2 and 10 ng/ml and underwent prostate biopsies within the 3 months were enrolled. With phi and tPSA thresholds of 43 and 4 ng/ml, respectively, probability for each branch of a decision tree model for PCa diagnosis and corresponding mean cost were estimated with "Monte Carlo" simulations. A sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS With a similar sensitivity, phi strategy increased positive predictive value by 13.9 points and negative predictive value by 31.6 points in comparison to tPSA strategy. Mean costs per patient with tPSA and phi strategies were €514 and €528, respectively, for a phi test price at 50€. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that phi strategy was less expensive (508€/patient) than tPSA strategy with a phi test price below 30€. In multi-criteria sensitivity analysis, PPV and the rates of positive phi and tPSA were the parameters with the largest impact on the final cost as opposed to the cost of the biopsy or imaging which have less influence. With an expected rate of positive phi test < 60%, tPSA strategy was more expensive than phi strategy. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of phi index in PCa detection would result in a significant clinical benefit compared to tPSA strategy. In our economic model, the phi strategy was equivalent or slightly more expensive than the current tPSA strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Service D'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Tarek Fardoun
- Department of Urology, Service D'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Service D'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Service D'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Sébastien Vincendeau
- Department of Urology, Service D'urologie, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy. World J Urol 2018; 36:761-768. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2189-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
|
17
|
Preoperative prostate health index predicts poor pathologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-detected low-risk patients prostate cancer: results from a Chinese prospective cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 21:64-70. [PMID: 29213105 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-017-0002-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the performance of the prostate health index (PHI) in predicting pathologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Chinese patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Of all consecutive patients who underwent RP in one tertiary center from September 2013 to January 2017, we prospectively examined the data of 140 patients with low-risk PCa based on the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria. All patients were eligible for active surveillance, but underwent RP. Clinical and pathological data were collected. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between the PHI and outcome of RP. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of different models. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the potential clinical usefulness of making model-based decisions. RESULTS Only 44 (31.4%) patients were finally confirmed to have organ-confined Gleason ≤6 PCa. A low PHI was significantly predictive of organ-confined Gleason ≤6 PCa (p = 0.001), while tPSA and f/tPSA were not associated with final pathology. In the multivariate analyses, addition of the PHI significantly increased the predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.767, 95% Cl 0.685-0.849, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The PRIAS criteria for active surveillance may not suitable for Chinese patients with PCa. Addition of the PHI to the PRIAS models improved the prognostic performance. If confirmed in future larger and multicenter studies, PHI may help us to identify patients eligible for AS in China.
Collapse
|
18
|
Glaser ZA, Gordetsky JB, Porter KK, Varambally S, Rais-Bahrami S. Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance. Front Oncol 2017; 7:256. [PMID: 29164056 PMCID: PMC5670116 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Active surveillance (AS) is a widely adopted strategy to monitor men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Current AS inclusion criteria may misclassify as many as one in four patients. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and novel PCa biomarkers may offer improved risk stratification. We performed a review of recently published literature to characterize emerging evidence in support of these novel modalities. Methods An English literature search was conducted on PubMed for available original investigations on localized PCa, AS, imaging, and biomarkers published within the past 3 years. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, biomarker, genetic, genomic, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. The bibliographies and diagnostic modalities of the identified studies were used to expand our search. Results Our review identified 222 original studies. Our expanded search yielded 244 studies. Among these, 70 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI offers improved detection of clinically significant PCa, and MRI-fusion technology enhances the sensitivity of surveillance biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the promise of commercially available screening assays for prediction of AS failure, and several novel biomarkers show promise in this setting. Conclusion In the era of AS for men with low-risk PCa, improved strategies for proper stratification are needed. mpMRI has dramatically enhanced the detection of clinically significant PCa. The advent of novel biomarkers for prediction of aggressive disease and AS failure has shown some initial promise, but further validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Glaser
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.,Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kristin K Porter
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.,Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Borque-Fernando Á, Rubio-Briones J, Esteban LM, Collado-Serra A, Pallás-Costa Y, López-González PÁ, Huguet-Pérez J, Sanz-Vélez JI, Gil-Fabra JM, Gómez-Gómez E, Quicios-Dorado C, Fumadó L, Martínez-Breijo S, Soto-Villalba J. The management of active surveillance in prostate cancer: validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study risk calculator with the Spanish Urological Association Registry. Oncotarget 2017; 8:108451-108462. [PMID: 29312542 PMCID: PMC5752455 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The follow up of patients on active surveillance requires to repeat prostate biopsies. Predictive models that identify patients at low risk of progression or reclassification are essential to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. The aim of this study is to validate the Prostate Active Surveillance Study risk calculator (PASS-RC) in the multicentric Spanish Urological Association Registry of patients on active surveillance (AS), from common clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IIS-Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Mariano Esteban
- Escuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jesús Manuel Gil-Fabra
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IIS-Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Enrique Gómez-Gómez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Fumadó
- Department of Urology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Martínez-Breijo
- Department of Urology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Juan Soto-Villalba
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morgia G, Voce S, Palmieri F, Gentile M, Iapicca G, Giannantoni A, Blefari F, Carini M, Vespasiani G, Santelli G, Arnone S, Pareo RM, Russo GI. Association between selenium and lycopene supplementation and incidence of prostate cancer: Results from the post-hoc analysis of the procomb trial. PHYTOMEDICINE : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOTHERAPY AND PHYTOPHARMACOLOGY 2017; 34:1-5. [PMID: 28899491 DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many potential chemopreventive agents have been used in PCa prevention, including selenium (Se) and lycopene (Ly). However, their role has been matter of debate over the years, due to potential of promotion of PCa. PURPOSE In this study we aimed at evaluating the incidence risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in a cohort of patients treated with Se and Ly. METHODS The Procomb trial design has been previously published (ISRCTN78639965). From April 2012 to April 2014 209 patients were followed and underwent prostate biopsy when PSA ≥4 ng/ml and/or suspicion of PCa. The all cohort was composed by patients treated with Se and Ly (Group A = 134 patients) and control (Group B = 75 patients). RESULTS During the follow-up time of 2 years, a total of 24 patients (11.5%) underwent prostate biopsy, of which 9 (4.3%) where diagnosed with PCa and 15 (7.2%) where diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. We did not observe statistical differences in terms of mean changes of PSA between the two groups (p-value for trend = 0.33). The relative risk (RR) for PCa was 1.07 and 0.89 in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.95). At the multivariate Cox regression analysis supplementation with Se and Ly was not associated with greater risk of PCa (hazard ratio: 1.38; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION In this analysis we did not show evidences supporting a detrimental role of Selenium and Lycopene supplementation in increasing PCa after 2 years of therapy, nor supporting a protective role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Morgia
- Department of Urology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Franco Blefari
- Urologic Unit, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ferro M, Lucarelli G, Bruzzese D, Di Lorenzo G, Perdonà S, Autorino R, Cantiello F, La Rocca R, Busetto GM, Cimmino A, Buonerba C, Battaglia M, Damiano R, De Cobelli O, Mirone V, Terracciano D. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Oncotarget 2017; 8:18424-18434. [PMID: 27793023 PMCID: PMC5392340 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) is currently a widely accepted treatment option for men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Several reports have highlighted the association of low serum testosterone levels with high-grade, high-stage PCa. However, the impact of serum testosterone as a predictor of progression in men with low-risk PCa has been little assessed. In this study, we evaluated the association of circulating testosterone concentrations with a staging/grading reclassification in a cohort of low-risk PCa patients meeting the inclusion criteria for the AS protocol but opting for radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy (RP) was performed in 338 patients, eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, PSA<10ng/ml, two or fewer cancer cores, Gleason score (GS)=6 and PSA density<0.2 ng/mL/cc. Reclassification was defined as upstaging (stage>pT2) and upgrading (GS=7; primary Gleason pattern 4) disease. Unfavorable disease was defined as the occurrence of pathological stage>pT2 and predominant Gleason score 4. Total testosterone was measured before surgery. Low serum testosterone levels (<300 ng/dL) were significantly associated with upgrading, upstaging, unfavorable disease and positive surgical margins. The addition of testosterone to a base model, including age, PSA, PSA density, clinical stage and positive cancer involvement in cores, showed a significant independent influence of this variable on upstaging, upgrading and unfavorable disease. In conclusion, our results support the idea that total testosterone should be a selection criterion for inclusion of low-risk PCa patients in AS programs and suggest that testosterone level less than 300 ng/dL should be considered a discouraging factor when a close AS program is considered as treatment option
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Dario Bruzzese
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - IRCCS", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | | | - Amelia Cimmino
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics "A. Buzzati Traverso", National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clinton TN, Bagrodia A, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Raj GV, Woldu SL. Tissue-based biomarkers in prostate cancer. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2017; 2:249-260. [PMID: 29226251 PMCID: PMC5722240 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2017.1372687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Existing risk stratification tools based on standard clinlicopathologic variables (prostate specific antigen [PSA], Gleason score, and tumor stage) provide a modest degree of predictive ability. Advances in high-throughput sequencing has led to the development of several novel tissue-based biomarkers that can improve prognostication in prostate cancer management. AREAS COVERED The authors review commercially-available, tissue-based biomarker assays that improve upon existing risk-stratification tools in several areas of prostate cancer management, including the appropriateness of active surveillance and aiding in decision making regarding the use of adjuvant therapy. Additionally, some of the obstacles to the widespread adoption of these biomarkers and discuss several investigational sources of new biomarkers are discussed. EXPERT COMMENTARY Work is ongoing to answer pertinent clinical questions in prostate cancer management including which patients should undergo biopsy, active surveillance, receive adjuvant therapy, and what systemic therapy is best in the first-line. Incorporation into novel biomarkers may allow for the incorporation of a 'personalized' approach to management. Further validation will be required and questions of cost must be considered before wide scale adoption of these biomarkers. Tumor heterogeneity may impose a ceiling on the prognostic ability of biomarkers using currently available techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N Clinton
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ganesh V Raj
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Active surveillance has been increasingly utilized as a strategy for the management of favorable-risk, localized prostate cancer. In this review, we describe contemporary management strategies of active surveillance, with a focus on traditional stratification schemes, new prognostic tools, and patient outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Patient selection, follow-up strategy, and indication for delayed intervention for active surveillance remain centered around PSA, digital rectal exam, and biopsy findings. Novel tools which include imaging, biomarkers, and genetic assays have been investigated as potential prognostic adjuncts; however, their role in active surveillance remains institutionally dependent. Although 30-50% of patients on active surveillance ultimately undergo delayed treatment, the vast majority will remain free of metastasis with a low risk of dying from prostate cancer. The optimal method for patient selection into active surveillance is unknown; however, cancer-specific mortality rates remain excellent. New prognostication tools are promising, and long-term prospective, randomized data regarding their use in active surveillance will be beneficial.
Collapse
|
24
|
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Health Index and 4-Kallikrein Panel Score in Predicting Overall and High-grade Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:429-439.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Revised: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
25
|
Ploussard G. Kallikreins Panel for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Prediction: More Is Not Enough. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3:100-101. [PMID: 28720353 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
26
|
Loeb S. Biomarkers for Prostate Biopsy and Risk Stratification of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2017; 4:315-321. [PMID: 29104903 PMCID: PMC5667651 DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many new markers are now available as an aid for decisions about prostate biopsy for men without prostate cancer, and/or to improve risk stratification for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS A literature review was performed on currently available markers for use in decisions about prostate biopsy and initial prostate cancer treatment. RESULTS Although total prostate-specific antigen cutoffs were traditionally used for biopsy decisions, PSA elevations are not specific. Repeating the PSA test, and adjusting for factors like age, prostate volume and changes over time can increase specificity for biopsy decisions. The Prostate Health Index (phi) and 4K Score are new PSA-based markers that can be offered as second-line tests to decide on initial or repeat prostate biopsy. The PCA3 urine test and ConfirmMDx tissue test are additional options for repeat biopsy decisions. For men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, genomic tests are available to refine risk classification and may influence treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS Numerous secondary testing options are now available that can be offered to patients deciding whether to undergo prostate biopsy and those with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, Population Health, and the Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University and the Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pepe P, Cimino S, Garufi A, Priolo G, Russo GI, Giardina R, Reale G, Pennisi M, Morgia G. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Scand J Urol 2017; 51:260-263. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1313310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Pepe
- Urology and Imaging Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Garufi
- Urology and Imaging Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Raimondo Giardina
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giulio Reale
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Michele Pennisi
- Urology and Imaging Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Morgia
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article intends to review biomarkers derived from blood, urine, and tissue that can aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS PCa screening requires tools that complement prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with a higher specificity for clinically significant disease. Novel blood biomarkers, such as the Prostate Health Index (phi) and 4Kscore, utilize isoforms of PSA to more accurately predict high-grade PCa than traditional tools such as PSA and the percentage free-to-total PSA. Several gene products associated with PCa can be detected in the urine through commercially available assays. PCa antigen 3 (PCA3), though approved for repeat biopsy decisions, appears inferior to other biomarkers such as phi for identifying aggressive disease. However, combinations of PCA3 with other urine assays have shown promising results. One tissue-based hypermethylation test, named ConfirmMDx, can also be used to determine the need for repeat biopsy in men with a prior negative biopsy. SUMMARY Several biomarkers have been developed to aid in the screening and diagnosis of PCa. Such tests are often indicated in men with moderately elevated PSA or history of a prior negative biopsy. Their use facilitates reduction of unnecessary biopsies without sacrificing the early diagnosis of clinically significant PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Dani
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, NY, NY
- Population Health, New York University, NY, NY
- Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, NY, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The prostate health index PHI predicts oncological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - analysis in 437 patients. Oncotarget 2017; 8:79279-79288. [PMID: 29108306 PMCID: PMC5668039 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the Prostate-Health-Index (PHI) for pathological outcome prediction following radical prostatectomy and also for biochemical recurrence prediction in comparison to established parameters such as Gleason-score, pathological tumor stage, resection status (R0/1) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Out of a cohort of 460 cases with preoperative PHI-measurements (World Health Organization calibration: Beckman Coulter Access-2-Immunoassay) between 2001 and 2014, 437 patients with complete follow up data were included. From these 437 patients, 87 (19.9%) developed a biochemical recurrence. Patient characteristics were compared by using chi-square test. Predictors were analyzed by multivariate adjusted logistic and Cox regression. The median follow up for a biochemical recurrence was 65 (range 3-161) months. PHI, PSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density performed as significant variables (p < 0.05) for cancer aggressiveness: Gleason-score <7 or ≥7 (ISUP grade 1 or ≥2) . Concerning pathological tumor stage discrimination and prediction, variables as PHI, PSA, %fPSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density significantly discriminated between stages <pT3 and ≥pT3 with the highest AUC (0.7) for PHI. In biochemical recurrence prediction PHI, PSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density were the strongest predictors. In conclusion, due to heterogeneity of time spans to biochemical recurrence, longer follow up periods are crucial. This study with a median follow up of more than 5 years, confirmed a clinical value for PHI as an independent biomarker essential for biochemical recurrence prediction.
Collapse
|
30
|
Hendriks RJ, van Oort IM, Schalken JA. Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 20:12-19. [DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
31
|
Jakobsen NA, Hamdy FC, Bryant RJ. Novel biomarkers for the detection of prostate cancer. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2016; 9:3-10. [PMID: 28344810 PMCID: PMC5356177 DOI: 10.1177/2051415816656121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used as a biomarker in the detection of prostate cancer and for decision making regarding treatment options, response to therapy, and clinical follow-up. Despite its widespread use, it is well recognised that PSA has suboptimal performance as a screening tool due to poor specificity, resulting in high negative biopsy rates and potential ‘over-diagnosis’ and ‘over-treatment’ of clinically insignificant cancers. In particular, PSA does not reliably distinguish either cancer from benign prostatic conditions, or ‘clinically significant’ from ‘indolent cancers’, and it is inaccurate in predicting disease burden and response to treatment. There is an urgent demand for novel biomarkers to address these clinical needs. This article provides an update on the novel candidate biomarkers in development, which have shown potential for improving the detection of clinically significant cases of this malignancy.
Collapse
|
32
|
Loeb S, Lilja H, Vickers A. Beyond prostate-specific antigen: utilizing novel strategies to screen men for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2016; 26:459-65. [PMID: 27262138 PMCID: PMC5035435 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article is to review blood and urine tests that are currently available and under investigation for a role in prostate cancer screening and detection. RECENT FINDINGS Compared with total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone, its combination with percentage free-to-total PSA contributes greater specificity for prostate cancer, and is a component of two newer blood tests called the 4kScore and Prostate Health Index. All three tests improve the prediction of high-grade disease and are commercially available options to aid in initial or repeat prostate biopsy decisions. PCA3 is a urinary marker that is currently available for repeat prostate biopsy decisions. Although PCA3 alone has inferior prediction of clinically significant disease and requires collection of urine after digital rectal examination, it may be combined with other clinical variables or other urine markers like TMPRSS2:ERG to improve performance. Little data are available to support a role for single nucleotide polymorphisms or other investigational markers in early detection. SUMMARY Several commercially available blood and urine tests have been shown to improve specificity of PSA for high-grade prostate cancer. Use of such tests would decrease unnecessary biopsy and overdiagnosis of indolent disease. Biopsy of men with moderately elevated PSA without use of such a reflex test should be discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA and Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
The Prostate Health Index is a Food and Drug Administration-approved blood test combining total, free, and [-2]pro prostate-specific antigen with greater specificity than free and total prostate-specific antigen for clinically significant prostate cancer. This article reviews the evidence on the performance of the Prostate Health Index to predict prostate biopsy outcome, its incorporation into multivariable risk-assessment tools, and its ability to predict prognosis after conservative management or prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbey Lepor
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William J Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 North St. Clair Street, Galter Suite 20-150, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Population Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|