The effects of tolvaptan dose on cardiac mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure after hospital discharge

Cost-Effectiveness of long-term tolvaptan administration for chronic heart failure treatment in Japan

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan (TLV) is effective for acute heart failure (HF) with congestion, but its long-term administration in patients with chronic HF (CHF) remains controversial. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment has not yet been investigated. Thus, we sought to validate the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment in Japan.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between long-term TLV strategy and the standard strategy using furosemide for CHF. The target population included 75-year-old patients with CHF. The effectiveness of the TLV strategy for CHF treatment was determined based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. We used a 10-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and a scenario analysis for patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide (≥60 mg per day).

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, the total cost of the long-term TLV strategy was higher than that of the standard strategy (\3,243,779 vs. \1,179,964). The total QALYs of the long-term TLV strategy were lower than those of the standard strategy (4.52 vs 4.59). Thus, a standard TLV prescription for CHF treatment has no clinical or economic benefit. In the scenario analysis (i.e. in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide), the long-term TLV strategy was more effective (total QALYs, 5.10 vs. 4.41) but more expensive (total costs, \3,540,558 vs. \1,272,208) than the standard strategy. The ICER of the TLV strategy against the standard strategy (¥3,289,579/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay of \5,000,000, which suggests that the long-term TLV strategy is cost-effective relative to the standard strategy in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term TLV administration did not provide a clear benefit for all patients with CHF. However, this treatment strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients who require high-dose furosemide.

＜Editors' Choice＞ Prognostic utility of multipoint nutritional screening for hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of serial changes in nutritional status on 1-year events including all-cause mortality or rehospitalization owing to heart failure (HF) among hospitalized patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF). The study subjects comprised 253 hospitalized patients with ADHF. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score was assessed both at hospital admission and discharge. The subjects were divided into three groups according to nutritional status using CONUT score: normal (0 and 1), mild risk (2-4), and moderate to severe risk defined as malnutrition (5-12). We observed nutritional status was improved or not. The incidence of malnutrition was 30.4% at hospital admission and 23.7% at discharge, respectively. Malnutrition was independently associated with 1-year events among hospitalized patients with ADHF. Presence or absence of improvement in nutritional status was significantly associated with 1-year events (P < 0.05), that was independent of percentage change in plasma volume in multivariate Cox regression analyses. We determined a reference model, including gender and estimated glomerular filtration rate, using multivariate logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05). Adding the absence of improvement in nutritional status during hospitalization to the reference model significantly improved both NRI and IDI (0.563, P < 0.001 and 0.039, P = 0.001). Furthermore, malnutrition at hospital discharge significantly improved NRI (0.256, P = 0.036) In conclusion, serial changes in the nutritional status evaluated on the basis of multiple measurements may provide more useful information to predict 1-year events than single measurement at hospital admission or discharge in hospitalized patients with ADHF.

Tolvaptan in reversing worsening acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare efficacy and clinical outcomes of tolvaptan in treating acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods

Using MEDLINE, we searched relevant clinical studies using tolvaptan that investigated clinical effects in treating AHF. We performed meta-analysis for potentially extractable clinical outcomes such as body weight reduction, change in serum sodium levels, and clinical or safety events including worsening heart failure, worsening renal function (WRF), all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and dyspnea improvement.

Results

The results showed that tolvaptan significantly reduced body weight (mean change: −1.28 kg, 95% credible interval (CI): −1.58–0.98), increased serum sodium levels (mean change: 3.48 mmol/L; 95% Cl: 3.22–3.74), and improved dyspnea function (odds ratio (OR): 1.43; 95% CI: 1.26–1.62) versus conventional therapy. The event risk of WRF was also significantly reduced (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15–0.80). Low, intermediate, and high tolvaptan doses did not reduce mortality and rehospitalization risks. No significant publication bias was observed regarding effects on mortality and rehospitalization.

Conclusion

Current evidence indicates that using tolvaptan as add-on therapy can decrease body weight, increase sodium levels, improve dyspnea function, and reverse WRF, which may circumvent loop diuretics overdose and improve outcomes in patients with AHF.

Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients More Than 90 Years Old With Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The oral vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist, tolvaptan, causes aquaresis and improves symptoms in patients with congestive heart failure. However, few studies have explored the effect of tolvaptan in acute heart failure (AHF) patients ≥90 years old.

METHODS

This study enrolled 106 AHF patients treated with tolvaptan added to standard therapy. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: ≥90-year-old patients (over-90 group, mean 92 ± 2 years, n = 45) and <90-year-old patients (under-90 group, mean 76 ± 11 years, n = 61). Patients' characteristics were assessed, and efficacy and safety were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The over-90 group had a lower proportion of male patients, lower body weight, and higher ejection fraction. The under-90 group had significantly higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in total urine volume at 24 and 48 hours (1934 ± 983 mL vs 1816 ± 1028 mL, P = 0.58 and 3806 ± 1444 mL vs 4078 ± 1851 mL, P=0.47, respectively), the mean change in body weight (-3.0 ± 2.7 kg vs -2.6 ± 2.6 kg, P = 0.50), improvement of congestive symptoms, changes in serum sodium and creatinine levels, the incidences of hypernatremia (n = 0, 0% vs n = 1, 1.6%, P = 0.63), and worsening renal function (n = 9, 20% vs n = 17, 28%, P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in AHF patients aged more than 90 years were comparable to those of <90 years old. Tolvaptan provides a complementary therapeutic option for AHF patients aged more than 90 years.

Comparable effect of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Background: It is unclear that the difference in efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) on the length of hospital stay for both heart failure (HF) preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) and reduced EF (HFrEF) patients.Methods: We investigated 369 patients who were hospitalized with HF from February 2011 to June 2016 and initiated TLV. Patients who died in hospital, transferred hospital or clinical scenario 4 or 5 were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 108 patients with HFpEF and 96 patients with HFrEF. We evaluated the relationship between the length of hospital stay and the date of TLV initiation. Moreover, we compared the early use (within the median) and delayed use (the median or later) of TLV.Results: The date of TLV initiation was statistically associated with the length of hospital stay in both HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF: r = 0.625, P < 0.001, HFrEF: r = 0.618, P < 0.001). In HFpEF, the length of hospital stay in delayed use group was significantly longer than the early use group (22.2 ± 10.7 days and 38.1 ± 22.6 days, P < 0.001). The result was similar in HFrEF (22.0 ± 15.0 days and 32.1 ± 22.0 days, P = 0.008). On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay after initiation of TLV in both HFpEF and HFrEF. Other findings (including the severity of HF) were similar between the early use group and the delayed group in HFpEF and HFrEF.Conclusions: The time until TLV initiation after hospitalization was related to the length of hospital stay in HFpEF and HFrEF patients.