Incidence, laboratory detection and prognostic relevance of hypoxic hepatitis in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the evolving multifaceted nature of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the context of non-cardiac biomarkers that may improve CS management and risk stratification.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are increasing data highlighting the role of lactate, glucose, and other markers of inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in CS. These biomarkers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the concurrent hemo-metabolic and cellular disturbances observed in CS and offer insights beyond standard structural and functional cardiac assessments. Non-cardiac biomarkers both refine the diagnostic accuracy and improve the prognostic assessments in CS. Further studies revolving around novel biomarkers are warranted to support more targeted and effective therapeutic and management interventions in these high-risk patients.

[Liver diseases in the intensive care unit]

The frequency of liver diseases in the intensive care unit has increased significantly in recent years and is now observed in up to 20% of critically ill patients. The occurrence of liver disease is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Two groups of liver diseases in the intensive care unit can be distinguished. First, the group of "primary hepatic dysfunctions", which includes primary acute liver failure as well as acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with pre-existing liver cirrhosis. The second group of "secondary or acquired liver diseases" includes cholestatic liver diseases, as well as hypoxic liver injury and mixed forms, as well as other rarer liver diseases. Due to the diversity of liver diseases and the very different triggers, sufficient knowledge of the underlying changes (including hemodynamic changes, inflammatory states or drug-related) is essential. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of the underlying disease are essential for all liver dysfunction in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. This review article aims to take a closer look at liver diseases in the intensive care unit and provides insight into diagnostics and treatment options.

Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by acute end-organ hypoperfusion due to inadequate cardiac output that can result in multiorgan failure, which may lead to death. The diminished cardiac output in CS leads to systemic hypoperfusion and maladaptive cycles of ischemia, inflammation, vasoconstriction, and volume overload. Obviously, the optimal management of CS needs to be readjusted in view of the predominant dysfunction, which may be guided by hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic monitoring enables (1) characterization of the type of cardiac dysfunction and the degree of its severity, (2) very early detection of associated vasoplegia, (3) detection and monitoring of organ dysfunction and tissue oxygenation, and (4) guidance of the introduction and optimization of inotropes and vasopressors as well as the timing of mechanical support. It is now well documented that early recognition, classification, and precise phenotyping via early hemodynamic monitoring (e.g., echocardiography, invasive arterial pressure, and the evaluation of organ dysfunction and parameters derived from central venous catheterization) improve patient outcomes. In more severe disease, advanced hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization and the use of transpulmonary thermodilution devices is useful to facilitate the right timing of the indication, weaning from mechanical cardiac support, and guidance on inotropic treatments, thus helping to reduce mortality. In this review, we detail the different parameters relevant to each monitoring approach and the way they can be used to support optimal management of these patients.

Prediction of 30-day mortality in heart failure patients with hypoxic hepatitis: Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model

Background

This study aimed to explore the impact of hypoxic hepatitis (HH) on survival in heart failure (HF) patients and to develop an effective machine learning model to predict 30-day mortality risk in HF patients with HH.

Methods

In the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III and IV databases, clinical data and survival situations of HF patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively collected. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance baseline differences between HF patients with and without HH. Kaplan Meier analysis and multivariate Cox analysis were used to determining the effect of HH on the survival of CF patients. For developing a model that can predict 30-day mortality in CF patients with HH, the feature recurrence elimination (RFE) method was applied to feature selection, and seven machine learning algorithms were employed to model construction. After training and hyper-parameter optimization (HPO) of the model through cross-validation in the training set, a performance comparison was performed through internal and external validation. To interpret the optimal model, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used along with the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and the Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) techniques.

Results

The incidence of HH was 6.5% in HF patients in the MIMIC cohort. HF patients with HH had a 30-day mortality rate of 33% and a 1-year mortality rate of 51%, and HH was an independent risk factor for increased short-term and long-term mortality risk in HF patients. After RFE, 21 key features (21/56) were selected to build the model. Internal validation and external validation suggested that Categorical Boosting (Catboost) had a higher discriminatory capability than the other models (internal validation: AUC, 0.832; 95% CI, 0.819–0.845; external validation: AUC, 0.757 95% CI, 0.739–0.776), and the simplified Catboost model (S-Catboost) also had good performance in both internal validation and external validation (internal validation: AUC, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.787–0.813; external validation: AUC, 0.729, 95% CI, 0.711–0.745).

Conclusion

HH was associated with increased mortality in HF patients. Machine learning methods had good performance in identifying the 30-day mortality risk of HF with HH. With interpretability techniques, the transparency of machine learning models has been enhanced to facilitate user understanding of the prediction results.

Critical care hepatology: definitions, incidence, prognosis and role of liver failure in critically ill patients

Organ dysfunction or overt failure is a commonplace event in the critically ill affecting up to 70% of patients during their stay in the ICU. The outcome depends on the resolution of impaired organ function, while a domino-like deterioration of organs other than the primarily affected ones paves the way for increased mortality. “Acute Liver Failure” was defined in the 1970s as a rare and potentially reversible severe liver injury in the absence of prior liver disease with hepatic encephalopathy occurring within 8 weeks. Dysfunction of the liver in general reflects a critical event in “Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome” due to immunologic, regulatory and metabolic functions of liver parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells. Dysregulation of the inflammatory response, persistent microcirculatory (hypoxic) impairment or drug-induced liver injury are leading problems that result in “secondary liver failure,” i.e., acquired liver injury without underlying liver disease or deterioration of preexisting (chronic) liver disease (“Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure”). Conventional laboratory markers, such as transaminases or bilirubin, are limited to provide insight into the complex facets of metabolic and immunologic liver dysfunction. Furthermore, inhomogeneous definitions of these entities lead to widely ranging estimates of incidence. In the present work, we review the different definitions to improve the understanding of liver dysfunction as a perpetrator (and therapeutic target) of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critical care.

Graphic Abstract

Circulating Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Mild Hypothermia: A Biomarker Substudy of SHOCK-COOL Trial

Background: There is evidence that monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels reflect the intensity of the inflammatory response in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have a predictive value for clinical outcomes. However, little is known about the effect of mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) on the inflammatory response in patients with CS complicating AMI. Therefore, we conducted a biomarker study to investigate the effect of MTH on MCP-1 levels in patients with CS complicating AMI. Methods: In the randomized mild hypothermia in cardiogenic shock (SHOCK-COOL) trial, 40 patients with CS complicating AMI were enrolled and assigned to MTH (33 °C) for 24 h or normothermia at a 1:1 ratio. Blood samples were collected at predefined time points at the day of admission/day 1, day 2 and day 3. Differences in MCP-1 levels between and within the MTH and normothermia groups were assessed. Additionally, the association of MCP-1 levels with the risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days was analyzed. Missing data were accounted for by multiple imputation as sensitivity analyses. Results: There were differences in MCP-1 levels over time between patients in MTH and normothermia groups (P for interaction = 0.013). MCP-1 levels on day 3 were higher than on day 1 in the MTH group (day 1 vs day 3: 21.2 [interquartile range, 0.25–79.9] vs. 125.7 [interquartile range, 87.3–165.4] pg/mL; p = 0.006) and higher than in the normothermia group at day 3 (MTH 125.7 [interquartile range, 87.3–165.4] vs. normothermia 12.3 [interquartile range, 0–63.9] pg/mL; p = 0.011). Irrespective of therapy, patients with higher levels of MCP-1 at hospitalization tended to have a decreased risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days (HR, 2.61; 95% CI 0.997–6.83; p = 0.051). Conclusions: The cooling phase of MTH had no significant effect on MCP-1 levels in patients with CS complicating AMI compared to normothermic control, whereas MCP-1 levels significantly increased after rewarming. Trial registration: NCT01890317.

Intensive Care Management of the Cardiogenic Shock Patient

Optimal management of patients with cardiogenic shock requires a detailed and systematic assessment of all organ systems, balancing the risks and benefits of any investigation and intervention, while avoiding the complications of critical illness. Overall prognosis depends upon a number of factors, including that of the underlying cardiac disease and its potential reversibility, the severity of shock, the involvement of other organ systems, the age of the patient and comorbidities. As with all intensive care patients, the mainstay of management is supportive, up to and including implementation and management of a number of devices, including acute mechanical circulatory support. The assessment and management of these most critically ill patients therefore demands in-depth knowledge and skill relating to cardiac intensive care, extending well beyond standard intensive care or cardiology practice.

Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Model to Predict the Risk of Ischemic Liver Injury After Stanford A Aortic Dissection Surgery

Objective: To define the risk factors of ischemic liver injury (ILI) following Stanford A aortic dissection surgery and to propose a diagnostic model for individual risk prediction. Methods: We reviewed the clinical parameters of ILI patients who underwent cardiac surgery from Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University between January 1, 2015 and October 30, 2020. The data was analyzed by the use of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A risk prediction model was established and validated, which showed a favorable discriminating ability and might contribute to clinical decision-making for ILI after Stanford A aortic dissection (AAD) surgery. The discriminative ability and calibration of the diagnostic model to predict ILI were tested using C statistics, calibration plots, and clinical usefulness. Results: In total, 1,343 patients who underwent AAD surgery were included in the study. After univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, the following variables were incorporated in the prediction of ILI: pre-operative serum creatinine, pre-operative RBC count <3.31 T/L, aortic cross-clamp time >140 min, intraoperative lactic acid level, the transfusion of WRBC, atrial fibrillation within post-operative 24 h. The risk model was validated by internal sets. The model showed a robust discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.718. The calibration plots for the probability of perioperative ischemic liver injury showed coherence between the predictive probability and the actual probability (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.637). In the validation cohort, the nomogram still revealed good discrimination (C statistic = 0.727) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.872). The 10-fold cross-validation of the nomogram showed that the average misdiagnosis rate was 9.95% and the lowest misdiagnosis rate was 9.81%. Conclusion: Our risk model can be used to predict the probability of ILI after AAD surgery and have the potential to assist clinicians in making treatment recommendations.

Secondary Hepatic Injury in Pediatric Intensive Care: Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the profile of secondary hepatic injury (SHI), to determine risk factors and to evaluate its impact on prognosis of pediatric intensive care patients.

METHODS

An exploratory observational and retrospective study was conducted in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Two groups were defined: with SHI [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥100 IU/L or gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)≥100 IU/L or direct bilirubin ≥30 μmol/L] and without. SHI was divided into 3 patterns: cytolysis, cholestasis, and mixed.

RESULTS

SHI occurred in 16.5%, cytolysis in 5%, cholestasis in 4%, and mixed pattern in 7%. Independent risk factors for SHI were: organ dysfunction score PELOD-2 in D1 in cytolysis (n = 28); total parenteral nutrition and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM3) in cholestasis (n = 23); sepsis, oncologic comorbidities, PIM3, and respiratory dysfunction in mixed pattern (n = 37). The ALT was an independent risk factor and a good predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.865) with a cut-off of 137 IU/L.

CONCLUSIONS

SHI was associated with worst prognostic. ALT may be useful for detecting patients at increased risk of death, probably being a surrogate marker of the illness severity, reflecting a secondary injury.

Prognostic Value of Abnormal Liver Function Tests After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objective: To determine the clinical significance of post-procedural abnormal liver function test (ALFT) on the functional outcomes at 90 days in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients with AIS undergoing MT were enrolled from the Nanjing Stroke Registry Program and the multicenter Captor trial. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 at 90 days. Predictive models were established by multivariable logistic regression. Improved predictive value of models was assessed by continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). In addition, multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline were used to analyze dose–response correlations between the severity of ALFT and prognosis.

Results: Among 420 patients enrolled, 234 (55.7%) patients were diagnosed as post-procedural ALFT after MT. Patients with post-procedural ALFT had higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score on admission (median, 18 vs. 15, p < 0.001) and more pneumonia (65.4 vs. 38.2%, p < 0.001) than those without post-procedural ALFT. Post-procedural ALFT, rather than preprocedural ALFT, was independently associated with favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 0.28–0.81; p = 0.006). The improvement of predictive model after adding post-procedural ALFT was significant [continuous NRI (value, 0.401; p < 0.001), IDI (value, 0.013; p < 0.001)]. However, the restricted cubic spline indicated no evidence of a dose–response relationship between the severity of post-procedural ALFT and prognosis.

Conclusions: In AIS patients treated by MT, post-procedural ALFT was associated with more severe stroke and served as an independent predictor of worse prognosis at 90 days.

Severe liver dysfunction complicating course of COVID-19 in the critically ill: multifactorial cause or direct viral effect?

Background

SARS-CoV-2 caused a pandemic and global threat for human health. Presence of liver injury was commonly reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, reports on severe liver dysfunction (SLD) in critically ill with COVID-19 are lacking. We evaluated the occurrence, clinical characteristics and outcome of SLD in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Methods

Clinical course and laboratory was analyzed from all patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to ICU of the university hospital. SLD was defined as: bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dl or elevation of aminotransferase levels (> 20-fold ULN).

Results

72 critically ill patients were identified, 22 (31%) patients developed SLD. Presenting characteristics including age, gender, comorbidities as well as clinical presentation regarding COVID-19 overlapped substantially in both groups. Patients with SLD had more severe respiratory failure (paO₂/FiO_2: 82 (58–114) vs. 117 (83–155); p < 0.05). Thus, required more frequently mechanical ventilation (95% vs. 64%; p < 0.01), rescue therapies (ECMO) (27% vs. 12%; p = 0.106), vasopressor (95% vs. 72%; p < 0.05) and renal replacement therapy (86% vs. 30%; p < 0.001). Severity of illness was significantly higher (SAPS II: 48 (39–52) vs. 40 (32–45); p < 0.01). Patients with SLD and without presented viremic during ICU stay in 68% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.002). Occurrence of SLD was independently associated with presence of viremia [OR 6.359; 95% CI 1.336–30.253; p < 0.05] and severity of illness (SAPS II) [OR 1.078; 95% CI 1.004–1.157; p < 0.05]. Mortality was high in patients with SLD compared to other patients (68% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, SLD was independently associated with mortality [HR3.347; 95% CI 1.401–7.999; p < 0.01].

Conclusion

One-third of critically ill patients with COVID-19 suffer from SLD, which is associated with high mortality. Occurrence of viremia and severity of illness seem to contribute to occurrence of SLD and underline the multifactorial cause.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00835-3.

Identifying cardiogenic shock in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock is difficult to diagnose due to diverse presentations, overlap with other shock states (i.e. sepsis), poorly understood pathophysiology, complex and multifactorial causes, and varied hemodynamic parameters. Despite advances in interventions, mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock remains high. Emergency clinicians must be ready to recognize and start appropriate therapy for cardiogenic shock early.

OBJECTIVE

This review will discuss the clinical evaluation and diagnosis of cardiogenic shock in the emergency department with a focus on the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

The most common cause of cardiogenic shock is a myocardial infarction, though many causes exist. It is classically diagnosed by invasive hemodynamic measures, but the diagnosis can be made in the emergency department by clinical evaluation, diagnostic studies, and ultrasound. Early recognition and stabilization improve morbidity and mortality. This review will focus on identification of cardiogenic shock through clinical examination, laboratory studies, and point-of-care ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergency clinician should use the clinical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiogram, and point-of-care ultrasound to aid in the identification of cardiogenic shock. Cardiogenic shock has the potential for significant morbidity and mortality if not recognized early.

Assessment of microcirculation in cardiogenic shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adequate tissue perfusion is of utmost importance to avoid organ failure in patients with cardiogenic shock. Within the recent years, the microcirculation, defined as the perfusion of the smallest vessels, has been identified to play a crucial role. Microcirculatory changes may include capillary flow disturbances as well as changes in the density of perfused vessels. Due to the availability of new technologies to assess the microcirculation, interesting new data came up and it is the purpose of this review to summarize recent studies in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nowadays, an increasing number of studies confirm parameters of the microcirculation, derived by intravital microscopy, to represent strong outcome predictors in cardiogenic shock. In addition, microcirculation as read-out parameter in innovative clinical studies has meanwhile been accepted as serious endpoint. Treatment strategies such as mechanical assist devices, blood pressure regulating agents or fluids use tissue perfusion and microcirculatory network density as targets in addition to clinical perfusion evaluation and decreasing serum lactate levels.

SUMMARY

The parameter most frequently used to detect tissue malperfusion is serum lactate. Novel, noninvasive methods to quantify microvascular perfusion have the potential to guide treatment in terms of optimizing organ perfusion and oxygenation probably paving the way for an individualized therapy.

Lactate and other biomarkers as treatment target in cardiogenic shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock remains beside sudden cardiac death the most outcome relevant complication of acute myocardial infarction. Over the last two decades as confirmation of the benefit of early revascularization no further relevant improvement in outcome could be achieved. Biomarkers are important for diagnosis, monitoring, and management in cardiogenic shock patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

A bunch of different biomarkers have been associated with prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock. In routine use standard parameters such as serum lactate or serum creatinine are still most important in monitoring these patients. These established markers outperformed novel markers in prognostic impact in recent trials.

SUMMARY

Biomarkers serve as important treatment targets and may help physicians in therapeutic decision-making. Furthermore, the complex pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock may be better understood by investigation of different biomarkers.

[Hepatic dysfunction in patients with cardiogenic shock]

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that is frequently associated with acute hepatic dysfunction. Due to low cardiac output resulting in end-organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia, different types of liver dysfunction can develop, such as hypoxic hepatitis or acute liver failure. A very serious and late sequela is the secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically patients. Clinical management of acute hepatic dysfunction involves the stabilization of cardiac output to improve hepatic perfusion and the optimization of liver oxygenation. However, despite maximum efforts in supportive treatment, the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock and concomitant hepatic dysfunction remains poor.

Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the most common cause of death in patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and mortality remained nearly unchanged in the range of 40–50% during the last two decades. Early revascularization, vasopressors and inotropes, fluids, mechanical circulatory support, and general intensive care measures are widely used for CS management. However, there is only limited evidence for any of the above treatment strategies except for revascularization and the relative ineffectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pumping. This updated review will outline the management of CS complicating AMI with major focus on state-of-the art treatment.

Collapse

The modern cardiovascular care unit: the cardiologist managing multiorgan dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite many advances in the management of critically ill patients, cardiogenic shock remains a challenge because it is associated with high mortality. Even if there is no universally accepted definition of cardiogenic shock, end-perfusion organ dysfunction is an obligatory and major criterion of its definition.Organ dysfunction is an indicator that cardiogenic shock is already at an advanced stage and is undergoing a rapid self-aggravating evolution. The aim of the review is to highlight the importance to diagnose and to manage the organ dysfunction occurring in the cardiogenic shock patients by providing the best literature published this year.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first step is to diagnose the organ dysfunction and to assess their severity. Echo has an important and increasing place regarding the assessment of end-organ impairment whereas no new biomarker popped up.

SUMMARY

In this review, we aimed to highlight for intensivists and cardiologists managing cardiogenic shock, the recent advances in the care of end-organ dysfunctions associated with cardiogenic shock. The management of organ dysfunction is based on the improvement of the cardiac function by etiologic therapy, inotropes and assist devices but will often necessitate organ supports in hospitals with the right level of equipment and multidisciplinary expertise.

Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data

AIMS

Patients suffering from cardiogenic shock (CS) have a high mortality and morbidity. The Impella percutaneous left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) decreases LV preload, increases cardiac output, and improves coronary blood flow. We aimed to review and meta-analyze available data comparing Impella versus intra-aortic pump (IABP) counterpulsation or medical treatment in CS due to acute myocardial infarction or post-cardiac arrest.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Study-level data were analyzed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk rates were calculated and obtained using a random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird). Four studies were found suitable for the final analysis, including 588 patients. Primary endpoint was short-term mortality (in-hospital or 30-day mortality). In a meta-analysis of four studies comparing Impella versus control, Impella was not associated with improved short-term mortality (in-hospital or 30-day mortality; RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.57-1.24; p = 0.38; I² 55%). Stroke risk was not increased (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.36-2.81; p = 1.00; I²2 0%), but risk for major bleeding (RR 3.11 95% CI 1.50-6.44; p = 0.002; I² 0%) and peripheral ischemia complications (RR 2.58; 95% CI 1.24-5.34; p = 0.01; I² 0%) were increased in the Impella group.

CONCLUSION

In patients suffering from severe CS due to AMI, the use of Impella is not associated with improved short-time survival but with higher complications rates compared to IABP and medical treatment. Better patient selection avoiding Impella implantation in futile situations or in possible lower risk CS might be necessary to elucidate possible advantages of Impella in future studies.

Hypoxic liver injury after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Risk factors and neurological outcome

BACKGROUND

Hypoxic liver injury (HLI) is a frequent and life-threatening complication in critically ill patients that occurs in up to ten percent of critically ill patients. However, there is a lack of data on HLI following cardiac arrest and its clinical implications on outcome. Aim of this study was to investigate incidence, outcome and functional outcome of patients with HLI after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of a cardiac arrest registry data over a 7-year period. All patients with non-traumatic OHCA and IHCA with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) treated at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. HLI was defined according to established criteria. Predictors of HLI, occurrence, clinical and neurological outcome were assessed using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Out of 1068 patients after IHCA and OHCA with ROSC, 219 (21%) patients developed HLI. Rate of HLI did not differ significantly in IHCA and OHCA patients. Multivariate regression analysis identified time-to-ROSC [OR 1.18, 95% CI (1.01-1.38); p < 0.05], presence of cardiac failure [OR 2.57, 95% CI (1.65-4.01); p < 0.001] and Charlson comorbidity index [OR 0.83, 95% CI (0.72-0.95); p < 0.01] as independent predictors for occurrence of HLI. Good functional outcome was significantly lower in patients suffering from HLI after 28-days (35% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) and 1-year (34% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). Occurrence of HLI was associated with unfavourable neurological outcome [OR 1.74, 95% CI (1.16-2.61); p < 0.01] in multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

New onset of HLI is a frequent finding after IHCA and OHCA. HLI is associated with increased mortality, unfavourable neurological and overall outcome.

Invasive hemodynamics and cardiac biomarkers to predict outcomes after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with severe heart failure

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) via MitraClip implantation is a therapeutic option for high-risk or non-surgical candidates with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and advanced stages of heart failure (HF). However, these patients have a high mortality despite PMVR, and predictors for outcomes are not well established. Here, we evaluated invasive hemodynamics, echocardiography parameters, and biomarkers to predict outcomes after PMVR in severe HF patients.

METHODS

Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and severe and moderate-to-severe MR undergoing PMVR at our centre between September 2009 and January 2016 were analysed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were: left ventricular EF < 45%, preoperative right heart catheterization, successful MitraClip deployment ("technical success"), and follow-up for at least 1 year after the procedure. Data from preoperative right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and biomarkers were assessed. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year after PMVR. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and generated a risk score to predict outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 174 patients with PMVR and severe HF, 79.9% had functional MR. Mean EF was 25% (17.2; 30.7) and advanced New York Heart Association functional class was prevalent (class II: 13%; class III: 70%; and class IV: 17%). The cumulative incidences of all-cause death were 6.9% and 17.8% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, high-sensitive troponin T [hsTnT; hazard ratio (HR) 1.01; confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.02; p < 0.0001] and mixed venous O₂-saturation (HR 0.92; CI 0.89-0.96; p < 0.0001) were found to significantly and independently predict outcomes. A simple risk score including these two parameters was sufficient to discriminate between low- and high-risk patients (HR 7.22; CI 3.4-15.5; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients with severe HF undergoing PMVR, patients with elevated hsTnT and reduced mixed venous O₂-saturation carried the worst prognosis. A simple risk score including these two parameters may improve patient selection and outcomes after PMVR.

Arenobufagin is a novel isoform-specific probe for sensing human sulfotransferase 2A1

Human cytosolic sulfotransferase 2A1 (SULT2A1) is an important phase II metabolic enzyme. The detection of SULT2A1 is helpful for the functional characterization of SULT2A1 and diagnosis of its related diseases. However, due to the overlapping substrate specificity among members of the sulfotransferase family, it is difficult to develop a probe substrate for selective detection of SULT2A1. In the present study, through characterization of the sulfation of series of bufadienolides, arenobufagin (AB) was proved as a potential probe substrate for SULT2A1 with high sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, the sulfation of AB was characterized by experimental and molecular docking studies. The sulfate-conjugated metabolite was identified as AB-3-sulfate. The sulfation of AB displayed a high selectivity for SULT2A1 which was confirmed by in vitro reaction phenotyping assays. The sulfation of AB by human liver cytosols and recombinant SULT2A1 both obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with similar kinetic parameters. Molecular docking was performed to understand the interaction between AB and SULT2A1, in which the lack of interaction with Met-137 and Tyr-238 of SULT2A1 made it possible to eliminate substrate inhibition of AB sulfation. Finally, the probe was successfully used to determine the activity of SULT2A1 and its isoenzymes in tissue preparations of human and laboratory animals.