Atrial fibrillation ablation in adults with congenital heart disease on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation is safe and efficient

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Congenital Heart Disease: Therapeutic Challenges and Future Perspectives

The increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in adults with congenital heart disease raises significant questions regarding its management. The unique underlying anatomic and physiological background further adds to the difficulty in eliminating the AF burden in these patients. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and risk factors for AF in adult congenital heart disease, with a special focus on the existing challenges in AF ablation. Emerging imaging modalities and ablation techniques might have a role to play. Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of AF ablation in adult congenital heart disease is summarized, especially for patients with an atrial septal defect, Ebstein anomaly of the tricuspid valve, tetralogy of Fallot, and Fontan circulation. Finally, any remaining gaps in knowledge and potential areas of future research are highlighted.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Catheter Ablation in Adult Congenital Heart Disease on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation: Is it safe? - Data from a large single center study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is a critical treatment strategy for complex arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). In addition to vitamin K antagonists (VKA), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The study assessed the safety of catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC examining thromboembolic, bleeding or vascular access complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 234 ACHD patients with simple (n=83), moderate (n=66) or complex (n=85) CHD (mean age 46 years) undergoing 368 ablation procedures on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA (45.4%) or DOAC (54.6 %) was undertaken. Arrhythmias were AF (n=97, right AT (n=181), left AT (n=65) or a combination of AF and AT (n=25).

RESULTS

No thromboembolic complications occurred. There were major complications in 4 patients (1.1%; VKA n=1, DOAC n=3) including retroperitoneal hematoma (n=2) and AV fistula requiring surgical treatment (n=2). Minor bleeding or vascular access complications occurred in 46 cases (12.5%) including hematomas >5cm (n=26), AV fistulas (not requiring surgical intervention) (n=13) or pseudoaneurysms (n=7; thrombin injection in 3/7). Overall, no significant difference was found between the DOAC (14.9%) and the VKA group (12. 0%; p=0.411).

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC is feasible and safe. No thromboembolic events occurred, and major bleeding or vascular access complications were rare. No significant difference regarding minor bleeding or vascular access complications between patients on DOAC or VKA were found.

Impact of specialized electrophysiological care on the outcome of catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardias in adults with congenital heart disease: Independent risk factors and gender aspects

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the impact of gender and specialized care on the requirement of repeat treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHDs).

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess independent predictors of a combined end point of re-catheter ablation (CA) or cardioversion at 3 years of follow-up, including the impact of gender and specialized ACHD care.

METHODS

All ACHDs registered in a database of one of the largest German health insurers (≈9.2 million members) who underwent CA for SVT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 38,892 ACHDs 16 years or older, 485 (49.5% women; median age 58.4 years; interquartile range 42.1-70.8 years) underwent CA for SVT. Over 3-year follow-up, the number of yearly CA procedures increased significantly, particularly for atrial fibrillation (+195%) and atrial flutter (+108%). Moderate to severe complexity heart disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.66; P = .01), advanced age (OR 1.85 per year; P = .02), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.70; P = .01), and atrial fibrillation (OR 2.02; P = .002) emerged as independent predictors of retreatment. Retreatment was significantly less often performed if primary CA was carried out at a specialized CHD center (P = .009) in patients with moderate to severe complexity heart disease. Women treated in specialist centers had a 1.6-fold reduced risk of undergoing retreatment (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

CA for SVT is increasingly performed in ACHDs, especially for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Patients with moderate and severe complexity congenital heart defects and female ACHDs benefit from upfront referral to specialized CHD centers for CA. Centralization of care for ACHD arrhythmias should thus be advocated.

Anti-thrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI

Triple anti-thrombotic therapy combining oral anticoagulation and dual anti-platelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation was considered as standard and recommended by guidelines. While bleeding risk is considerable with that approach, data for efficacy are scare. Several trials assessed the possibility of reducing anti-thrombotic treatment by mainly shortening the exposure to acetylsalicylic acid. Dropping one of the anti-platelet components might increase the risk of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction or stroke. Despite that fear, the recent trials' primary endpoint was major and/or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding. We review data on major bleedings, intracranial bleedings and major adverse cardiovascular events from the published reports. We demonstrate that Non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC)-based strategies compared to VKA-based triple therapies significantly reduce the risk for TIMI-major bleedings by 39% and for intracranial bleedings by 66%, while they did not increase the risk for overall ischemic or embolic events. However, recent meta-analyses indicate an increased risk for stent thrombosis with less intense anti-thrombotic therapy. While the overall incidence rate for stent thrombosis is rather low, relative increases by about 30-60% are reported, but they did not translate into adverse clinical net-benefit ratios. This review highlights that using certain NOAC regimens proven effective for stroke prevention in AF can reduce the rate of bleeding without increasing ischemic or embolic events. Furthermore, additive ASA in triple anti-thrombotic regimens should be limited to 1 month and individual weighing of ischemic versus bleeding risk during the first 30 days seems to be reasonable.