Short- and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation in cardiac sarcoidosis and giant-cell myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

New-Onset Neurosarcoidosis Following Heart Transplant for Cardiac Sarcoidosis

A 63-year-old woman who underwent heart transplantation for cardiac sarcoidosis developed new headache and vision changes. Extensive workup resulted in a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis treated with pulse dose steroids and infliximab. Recurrence of sarcoidosis after transplantation for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis occurs, but optimal surveillance methods remain unknown.

Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Management and Prognostic Implications

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is characterized by various arrhythmic manifestations ranging from catastrophic sudden cardiac death secondary to ventricular arrhythmia, severe conduction disease, sinus node dysfunction, and atrial fibrillation. The management of CS is complex and includes not only addressing the arrhythmia but also controlling the myocardial inflammation resultant from the autoimmune reaction. Arrhythmic manifestations of CS carry significant prognostic implications and invariably affect long-term survival in these patients. In this review, we focus on management of arrhythmic manifestation of cardiac sarcoidosis as well as risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in these patients.

Unraveling the Uncommon: A Case Report of Giant Cell Myocarditis and Examination of Existing Literature

BACKGROUND Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis (IGCM) is an uncommon and frequently fatal type of myocarditis. It primarily affects young individuals and has the potential to result in heart failure and life-threatening arrhythmias. IGCM seems to be dependent on activation of CD4-positive T lymphocytes and can show improvement with treatment aimed at reducing T-cell function. We present a case of a 65-year-old patient who presented with features of acute heart failure refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), due to IGCM. A review of the natural history and treatment of IGCM is also presented. CASE REPORT A 65-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities was admitted to our hospital for ventricular tachycardia in the setting of progressive non-ischemic heart failure, unresponsive to GDMT. This led to further investigation, including an endomyocardial biopsy, which revealed inflammatory infiltration, with multinucleated giant cells and lymphocytes in the absence of granuloma formation, prompting a diagnosis of IGCM. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was placed for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and the patient was initiated on combined immunosuppressive therapy. Owing to numerous comorbidities, she was determined to be unsuitable for a heart transplant. Unfortunately, she eventually died from complications secondary to the disease. CONCLUSIONS IGCM remains a challenging clinical diagnosis with a poor long-term outcome without heart transplantation. This case highlights the importance of considering atypical causes of heart failure in patients who do not respond to conventional therapies. Early recognition and appropriate management, involving medical and interventional approaches, are crucial in improving outcomes for patients with IGCM.

Biomarkers in Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Updated Review of the Literature

Myocarditis is a disease caused by cardiac inflammation that can progress to dilated cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and eventually death. Several etiologies, including autoimmune, drug-induced, and infectious, lead to inflammation, which causes damage to the myocardium, followed by remodeling and fibrosis. Although there has been an increasing understanding of pathophysiology, early and accurate diagnosis, and effective treatment remain challenging due to the high heterogeneity. As a result, many patients have poor prognosis, with those surviving at risk of long-term sequelae. Current diagnostic methods, including imaging and endomyocardial biopsy, are, at times, expensive, invasive, and not always performed early enough to affect disease progression. Therefore, the identification of accurate, cost-effective, and prognostically informative biomarkers is critical for screening and treatment. The review then focuses on the biomarkers currently associated with these conditions, which have been extensively studied via blood tests and imaging techniques. The information within this review was retrieved through extensive literature research conducted on major publicly accessible databases and has been collated and revised by an international panel of experts. The biomarkers discussed in the article have shown great promise in clinical research studies and provide clinicians with essential tools for early diagnosis and improved outcomes.

Recurrent Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Giant Cell Myocarditis After Heart Transplant: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review

Recurrence of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and giant cell myocarditis (GCM) after heart transplant is rare, with rates of 5% in CS and 8% in GCM. We aim to identify all reported cases of recurrence in the literature and to assess clinical course, treatments, and outcomes to improve understanding of the conditions. A systematic review, utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted by searching MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase of all available literature describing post-transplant recurrent granulomatous myocarditis, CS, or GCM. Data on demographics, transplant, recurrence, management, and outcomes data were collected from each publication. Comparison between the 2 groups were made using standard statistical approaches. Post-transplant GM recurrence was identified in 39 patients in 33 total publications. Reported cases included 24 GCM, 12 CS, and 3 suspected cases. Case reports were the most frequent form of publication. Mean age of patients experiencing recurrence was 42 years for GCM and 48 years for CS and favored males (62%). Time to recurrence ranged from 2 weeks to 9 years post-transplant, occurring earlier in GCM (mean 1.8 vs 3.0 years). Endomyocardial biopsies (89%) were the most utilized diagnostic method over cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Recurrence treatment regimens involved only steroids in 40% of CS, whereas other immunomodulatory regimens were utilized in 70% of GCM. In conclusion, GCM and CS recurrence after cardiac transplantation holds associated risks including concurrent acute cellular rejection, a higher therapeutic demand for GCM recurrence compared with CS, and mortality. New noninvasive screening techniques may help modify post-transplant monitoring regimens to increase both early detection and treatment of recurrence.

Case Series: Recurrence of Cardiac Sarcoidosis After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Orthotopic heart transplantation for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is becoming increasingly common. Historically, there have been concerns regarding disease recurrence within the allograft. Although rarely reported in the literature, cases of recurrent CS tend to be observed in patients after dose reduction of immunosuppressive therapy and cessation of corticosteroids. Here, we present 2 cases of recurrent CS after orthotopic heart transplantation, confirmed on endomyocardial biopsy. Case 1 reports a 50-year-old man with a fulminant course of giant cell myocarditis who developed allograft recurrence with granulomas 5 years after transplantation despite maintenance corticosteroid therapy. Case 2 reports a 47-year-old man with CS who developed recurrence with the presence of giant cells 2 years after transplantation, with a benign clinical course. With these cases, we demonstrate the clinical overlap between CS and giant cell myocarditis and highlight the spectrum of the disease process. We also demonstrate that CS can recur despite corticosteroid maintenance therapy.

Clinical and Histopathologic Characteristics of Recurrent Sarcoidosis in Posttransplant Lungs: 25 Years of Experience

Lung transplantation is the definitive therapy for end-stage pulmonary sarcoidosis. While recurrent sarcoidosis in allografts has been described in several case reports, the incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics remain unclear. In this study, we characterize the clinical and histopathologic features of recurrent sarcoidosis diagnosed in posttransplant lung surveillance transbronchial biopsies (TBBx). We identified 35 patients who underwent lung transplant for pulmonary sarcoidosis during the study period. Among them, 18 patients (51%) experienced recurrent sarcoidosis posttransplant. These included 7 females and 11 males with mean age at recurrence of 51.6 years. The average time interval from transplant to recurrence was 252 days (22 to 984 d). All TBBx contained >4 pieces of alveolated lung tissue with no evidence of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade A2, A3, or A4 acute cellular rejection; chronic rejection; or antibody-mediated rejection. There were 33 surveillance TBBx that contained granulomatous inflammation with a mean of 3.6 well-formed granulomas per TBBx (range: 1 to >20). Multinucleated giant cells were identified in 11 TBBx (33.3%), with 1 case containing asteroid bodies. While most of the granulomas were "naked granulomas," 5 cases (15.2%) showed prominent lymphoid cuffing. Two cases showed evidence of fibrosis. One of the granulomas had focal necrosis; however, no infectious organisms were identified by special stains and clinical correlation suggested this case represented recurrent sarcoidosis. Biopsies of recurrent sarcoidosis usually show multiple well-formed granulomas with giant cells in more than half of the cases, while lymphoid cuffing, fibrosis, asteroid bodies, and necrotizing granulomas are uncommon findings. Pathologists should be aware of these features, as recurrence of sarcoidosis following lung transplant occurs in more than half of patients.

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Long-Term Survival in Patients With and Without Previously Known Extracardiac Sarcoidosis Using Machine Learning: A Swedish Multicenter Study

Background Cardiac involvement can be an initial manifestation in sarcoidosis. However, little is known about the association between various clinical phenotypes of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and outcomes. We aimed to analyze the relation of different clinical manifestations with outcomes of CS and to investigate the relative importance of clinical features influencing overall survival. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort of 141 patients with CS enrolled at 2 Swedish university hospitals was studied. Presentation, imaging studies, and outcomes of de novo CS and previously known extracardiac sarcoidosis were compared. Survival free of primary composite outcome (ventricular arrhythmias, heart transplantation, or death) was assessed. Machine learning algorithm was used to study the relative importance of clinical features in predicting outcome. Sixty-two patients with de novo CS and 79 with previously known extracardiac sarcoidosis were included. De novo CS showed more advanced New York Heart Association class (P=0.02), higher circulating levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) (P<0.001), and troponins (P<0.001), as well as a higher prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction (P<0.001). During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 61 (44-77) months, event-free survival was shorter in patients with de novo CS (P<0.001). The top 5 features predicting worse event-free survival in order of importance were as follows: impaired tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, de novo CS, reduced right ventricular ejection fraction, absence of β-blockers, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions Patients with de novo CS displayed more severe disease and worse outcomes compared with patients with previously known extracardiac sarcoidosis. Using machine learning, right ventricular dysfunction and de novo CS stand out as strong overall predictors of impaired survival.

Heart transplantation in end-stage heart failure secondary to cardiac sarcoidosis: an updated systematic review

The prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis is increasing with improved cardiac imaging and may lead to severe heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias that warrant heart transplant consideration. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of heart transplantation in sarcoidosis. We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified 15 articles that examined patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of heart transplantation in cardiac sarcoidosis. We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified 15 studies that examined 1075 patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who underwent heart transplantation. A total of five studies reported individual patient data. Forty-two patients have been pooled for further analysis. There were 22 male patients, 14 female patients, and 7 patients whose gender was not reported. Among these patients, 10 patients had concomitant pulmonary sarcoidosis at the time of diagnosis. The mean survival was reported for all 42 patients. The mean survival in months was 71.4 months, with a range of 2 days to 288 months. Three patients died of graft failure, 2 patients from septic shock, 2 patients from pneumonia, 1 patient from cervical cancer, and 1 patient from sudden cardiac death. One patient developed a malignant arrythmia in the setting of CMV myocarditis post-heart transplant. Sarcoidosis recurrence after heart transplant was reported in 3 of 30 patients..Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis have shown to have favorable outcomes after heart transplant. Despite these outcomes, some centers still hesitate to pursue heart transplant for CS patients. Carefully selected patients with advanced-stage heart failure due to cardiac sarcoidosis have encouraging outcomes after transplantation. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the outcomes of heart transplantation in sarcoidosis.

Immunomodulatory Therapy for Giant Cell Myocarditis: A Narrative Review

Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) is a rare, often rapidly progressive, and potentially fatal disease because of myocardium inflammation due to the infiltration of giant cells triggered by infectious as well as non-infectious etiologies. Several studies have reported that GCM can occur in patients of all ages but is more commonly found in adults. It is relatively more common among African American and Hispanic patients than in the White population. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. Electrocardiogram (EKG), complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and cardiac biomarkers such as troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), myocardial biopsy, and myocardial gene profiling are useful diagnostic tools. Current research has identified several potential biomarkers for GCM, including myocarditis-associated immune cells, cytokines, and other chemicals. The standard of care for GCM includes aggressive immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents like rituximab, cyclosporine, and infliximab, which have shown promising results in GCM by balancing the immune system and preventing the attack on healthy tissues, resulting in the reduction of inflammation, promotion of healing, and decreasing the necessity for cardiac transplantation. Without immunosuppression, the chance of mortality or cardiac surgery was 100%. Multiple studies have revealed that a treatment combination of corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents is superior to corticosteroids alone. Combination therapy significantly increased transplant-free survival (TFS) and decreased the likelihood of heart transplantation, hence improving overall survival. It is important to balance the benefits of immunosuppression with its potentially adverse effects. In conclusion, immunomodulatory therapy adds significant long-term survival benefits to GCM.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: a comprehensive review of risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies

Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS) is a deadly consequence of systemic sarcoidosis that inflames all three layers of the heart, especially the myocardium-clinical signs of CS range from asymptomatic disease to abrupt cardiac death. CS generally remains undiagnosed secondary to a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria, a high percentage of false negative results on endomyocardial biopsy, and ill-defining clinical manifestations of the disease. Consequently, there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for CS, and the present diagnostic and therapeutic management depend on expert opinion. The aetiology, risk factors, clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and therapy of CS will be covered in this review. A particular emphasis will be placed on enhanced cardiovascular imaging and early identification of CS. We review the emerging evidence regarding the use of Electrocardiograms (ECGs), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the heart to identify and quantify the extent of myocardial inflammation, as well as to guide the use of immunotherapy and other treatment regimens, such as ablation therapy, device therapy, and heart transplantation, to improve patient outcomes.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

About 5% of sarcoidosis patients develop clinically manifest cardiac features. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) typically presents with conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Its diagnosis is challenging and requires a substantial degree of clinical suspicion as well as expertise in advanced cardiac imaging. Adverse events, particularly malignant arrhythmias and development of heart failure, are common among CS patients. A timely diagnosis is paramount to ameliorating outcomes for these patients. Despite weak evidence, immunosuppression (primarily with corticosteroids) is generally recommended in the presence of active inflammation in the myocardium. The burden of malignant arrhythmias remains important regardless of treatment, thus leading to the recommended use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in most patients with clinically manifest CS.

Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in Diagnostics of Myocarditis

Endomyocardial biopsy as the cornerstone of diagnostics has been re-evaluated throughout the years, leaving unanswered questions on the precedence of it. The reported incidence of myocarditis has increased during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reinforcing discussions on appropriate diagnostics of myocarditis. By analysis of evidence-based literature published within the last demi-decade, we aimed to summarize the most recent information in order to evaluate the current role of endomyocardial biopsy in diagnostics and management of myocarditis. For the most part, research published over the last five years showed ongoing uncertainty regarding the use, informativeness, safety and necessity of performing a biopsy. Special circumstances, such as fulminant clinical course or failure to respond to empirical treatment, were reconfirmed as justified indications, with a growing applicability of non-invasive diagnostic approaches for most other cases. We concluded that endomyocardial biopsy, if performed properly and with adjunct diagnostic methods, holds a critical role for treatment correction in specific histological subtypes of myocarditis and for differential diagnosis between immune-mediated myocarditis and secondary infections due to immunosuppressive treatment. A high level of possible misdiagnosing was detected, indicating the need to review terminology used to describe findings of myocardial inflammation that did not meet Dallas criteria.

Diagnosis, management, and outcome of cardiac sarcoidosis and giant cell myocarditis: a Swedish single center experience

Background

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and giant cell myocarditis (GCM) are rare diseases that share some similarities, but also display different clinical and histopathological features. We aimed to compare the demographics, clinical presentation, and outcome of patients diagnosed with CS or GCM.

Method

We compared the clinical data and outcome of all adult patients with CS (n = 71) or GCM (n = 21) diagnosed at our center between 1991 and 2020.

Results

The median (interquartile range) follow-up time for patients with CS and GCM was 33.5 [6.5–60.9] and 2.98 [0.6–40.9] months, respectively. In the entire cohort, heart failure (HF) was the most common presenting manifestation (31%), followed by ventricular arrhythmias (25%). At presentation, a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% was found in 54% of the CS compared to 86% of the GCM patients (P = 0.014), while corresponding proportions for right ventricular dysfunction were 24% and 52% (P = 0.026), respectively. Advanced HF (NYHA ≥ IIIB) was less common in CS (31%) than in GCM (76%). CS patients displayed significantly lower circulating levels of natriuretic peptides (P < 0.001) and troponins (P = 0.014). Eighteen percent of patients with CS included in the survival analysis reached the composite endpoint of death or heart transplantation (HTx) compared to 68% of patients with GCM (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

GCM has a more fulminant clinical course than CS with severe biventricular failure, higher levels of circulating biomarkers and an increased need for HTx. The histopathologic diagnosis remained key determinant even after adjustment for markers of cardiac dysfunction.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02639-0.

Fulminant Giant Cell Myocarditis following Heterologous Vaccination of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19

A 48-year-old female patient underwent a heart transplantation for acute fulminant myocarditis, following heterologous vaccination with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19. She had no history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. She did not exhibit clinical signs or have laboratory findings of concomitant infection before or after vaccination. Heart transplantation was performed because her heart failed to recover with venoarterial extracorporeal oxygenation support. Organ autopsy revealed giant cell myocarditis, possibly related to the vaccines. Clinicians may have to consider the possibility of the development of giant cell myocarditis, especially in patients with rapidly deteriorating cardiac function and myocarditis symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination.