Iguratimod in combination with methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis : Therapeutic effects. Z Rheumatol. 2016;75:828-833. [PMID: 26508503 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-015-1641-y]

Efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 84 randomized controlled trials

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) in the treatment of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Methods: Databases such as Pubmed, Embase, Sinomed were searched (as of July 2022) to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IGU in the treatment of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias of the included literature, and performed meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: A total of 84 RCTs and 4 types of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), primary Sjögren's syndrome (PSS) and Autoimmune disease with interstitial pneumonia]. Forty-three RCTs reported RA and showed that IGU + MTX therapy can improve ACR20 (RR 1.45 [1.14, 1.84], p = 0.003), ACR50 (RR 1.80 [1.43, 2.26], p < 0.0000), ACR70 (RR 1.84 [1.27, 2.67], p = 0.001), DAS28 (WMD -1.11 [-1.69, -0.52], p = 0.0002), reduce ESR (WMD -11.05 [-14.58, -7.51], p < 0.00001), CRP (SMD -1.52 [-2.02, -1.02], p < 0.00001), RF (SMD -1.65 [-2.48, -0.82], p < 0.0001), and have a lower incidence of adverse events (RR 0.84 [0.78, 0.91], p < 0.00001) than the control group. Nine RCTs reported AS and showed that IGU can decrease the BASDAI score (SMD -1.62 [-2.20, -1.05], p < 0.00001), BASFI score (WMD -1.07 [-1.39, -0.75], p < 0.00001), VAS (WMD -2.01 [-2.83, -1.19], p < 0.00001), inflammation levels (decreasing ESR, CRP and TNF-α). Thirty-two RCTs reported PSS and showed that IGU can reduce the ESSPRI score (IGU + other therapy group: WMD -1.71 [-2.44, -0.98], p < 0.00001; IGU only group: WMD -2.10 [-2.40, -1.81], p < 0.00001) and ESSDAI score (IGU + other therapy group: WMD -1.62 [-2.30, -0.94], p < 0.00001; IGU only group: WMD -1.51 [-1.65, -1.37], p < 0.00001), inhibit the inflammation factors (reduce ESR, CRP and RF) and increase Schirmer's test score (IGU + other therapy group: WMD 2.18 [1.76, 2.59], p < 0.00001; IGU only group: WMD 1.55 [0.35, 2.75], p = 0.01); The incidence of adverse events in IGU group was also lower than that in control group (IGU only group: RR 0.66 [0.48, 0.98], p = 0.01). Three RCTs reported Autoimmune disease with interstitial pneumonia and showed that IGU may improve lung function. Conclusion: Based on current evidence, IGU may be a safe and effective therapy for RA, AS, PSS and autoimmune diseases with interstitial pneumonia. Systematic Review Registration: (CRD42021289489).

Machine learning and molecular subtype analyses provide insights into PANoptosis-associated genes in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

PANoptosis represents a newly identified form of programmed cell death that plays a significant role in the autoimmune diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Nevertheless, the specific biomarkers and molecular mechanisms responsible for the apoptotic characteristics of RA remain largely uninvestigated.

METHODS

We utilized 8 synovial tissue RA datasets. We selected genes associated with PANoptosis from the GeneCard database. By employing the limma, WGCNA, and machine learning algorithms we identified core genes. We utilized consensus clustering analysis to identify distinct PANoptosis subtypes of RA. Boruta algorithm was employed to construct a PANoptosis signature score. The sensitivity of distinct subtypes to drug treatment was verified using an independent dataset.

RESULTS

The SPP1 emerged as the significant gene, with its elevated expression in RA patients. We identified two PANoptosis RA subtypes. Cluster 1 showed high expression of Tregs, resting dendritic cells, and resting mast cells. Cluster 2 exhibited high expression of CD4 memory T cells and follicular helper T cells. Cluster 2 exhibited a higher degree of sensitivity towards immune checkpoint therapy. Employing the Boruta algorithm, a subtype score was devised for 37 PANoptosis genes, successfully discerning the subtypes (AUC = 0.794), wherein patients with elevated scores demonstrated enhanced responsiveness to Rituximab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis revealed that SPP1 holds potential biomarker for the diagnosis of RA. Cluster 2 exhibited enhanced sensitivity to immune checkpoint therapy, higher PANoptosis scores, and improved responsiveness to drug treatment. This study offers potential implications in the realm of diagnosis and treatment.

Discovery and Validation of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Combination Antirheumatoid Arthritis Drugs Based on Machine Learning (Random Forest Model)

The combination of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine is a promising method for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Combining the two fully exploits the advantages of Western and TCM to treat RA and has the potential to greatly improve the therapeutic effect on RA. In this study, we developed a combination drug training set by using 16 characteristic variables based on the characteristics of small molecules of TCM ingredients and Food and Drug Administration-certified combination drug data downloaded from the DrugCombDB database. Furthermore, we compared the prediction and classification abilities of five models: the k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and AdaBoost algorithms. The random forest model was selected as the classification and prediction model for Western and TCM and Western combination drugs. We collected data for 41 small molecules of TCM ingredients from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology database and 10 small molecule drugs commonly used in anti-RA treatment from the DrugBank database. Combinations of Western and TCM for anti-RA treatment were screened. Finally, the CellTiter-Glo method was used to determine the synergy of these combinations, and the 15 most predicted drug combinations were carried out experimental verification. Myricetin, rhein, nobiletin, and fisetin had high synergy with celecoxib, and rhein had high synergy with hydroxychloroquine. The preliminary findings of this study can be further applied for practical clinical anti-RA combined treatment strategies and serve as a reference for clinical treatment of RA with integrated Western and TCM.

Macrophages and glial cells: Innate immune drivers of inflammatory arthritic pain perception from peripheral joints to the central nervous system

Millions of people suffer from arthritis worldwide, consistently struggling with daily activities due to debilitating pain evoked by this disease. Perhaps the most intensively investigated type of inflammatory arthritis is rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where, despite considerable advances in research and clinical management, gaps regarding the neuroimmune interactions that guide inflammation and chronic pain in this disease remain to be clarified. The pain and inflammation associated with arthritis are not isolated to the joints, and inflammatory mechanisms induced by different immune and glial cells in other tissues may affect the development of chronic pain that results from the disease. This review aims to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art research on the roles that innate immune, and glial cells play in the onset and maintenance of arthritis-associated pain, reviewing nociceptive pathways from the joint through the dorsal root ganglion, spinal circuits, and different structures in the brain. We will focus on the cellular mechanisms related to neuroinflammation and pain, and treatments targeting these mechanisms from the periphery and the CNS. A comprehensive understanding of the role these cells play in peripheral inflammation and initiation of pain and the central pathways in the spinal cord and brain will facilitate identifying new targets and pathways to aide in developing therapeutic strategies to treat joint pain associated with RA.

Effectiveness and Safety of Iguratimod Monotherapy or Combined With Methotrexate in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: We aimed to estimate the effectiveness and safety of iguratimod (IGU) monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to provide an evidence-primarily-based foundation for clinical application.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the meta-analysis using eight databases and two clinical trial websites searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from conception to 15 March 2022, based on outcomes of patients with RA treated with IGU. The evidence quality assessment of primary outcomes was evaluated by the GRADE tool, and RevMan 5.3 and StataMP 14.0 were used to perform this research.

Results: A total of 4302 patients with RA from 38 RCTs was included in this research. Pooled results demonstrated as follows: 1) Compared with methotrexate (MTX) alone, IGU alone was superior in improving ACR20 and DAS28-ESR, while having no significant difference in ACR50 and ACR70 [ACR20: (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.27, p = 0.004); ACR50: (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.66–1.44, p = 0.88); ACR70: (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.45–1.90, p = 0.83); DAS28-ESR: mean difference (MD) −0.15, 95% CI −0.27 to −0.03, p = 0.01]. 2) Compared with MTX alone, IGU + MTX was more effective in improving ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and DAS28-ESR. [ACR20: (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14–1.35, p < 0.00001); ACR50: (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.62–2.39, p <0.00001); ACR70: (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.41–2.57, p < 0.0001)]; [DAS28-ESR: (MD) −1.43, 95% CI −1.73 to −1.12, p < 0.00001]. 3) Compared with MTX + leflunomide (LEF), ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and DAS28-ESR of IGU + MTX had no significant difference [ACR20: (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94–1.19, p = 0.38); ACR50: (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.66–1.84, p = 0.72); ACR70: (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.45–3.20, p = 0.71); DAS28-ESR: (MD −0.02, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.10, p = 0.77)]. 4) Compared with MTX + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), IGU + MTX was superior in improving DAS28-ESR (MD −2.16, 95% CI −2.53 to −1.79, p < 0.00001). 5) Compared with MTX + tripterygium glycosides (TGs), IGU + MTX was more effective in improving DAS28-ESR (MD −0.94, 95% CI −2.36 to 0.48, p = 0.19). 6) There were no significant differences in adverse events (AEs) between the groups of IGU vs. MTX (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71–1.31, p = 0.80), IGU + MTX vs. MTX (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90–1.35, p = 0.34), IGU + MTX vs. MTX + HCQ (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29–1.42, p = 0.27), and IGU + MTX vs. MTX + TGs (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.28–2.02, p = 0.57). The incidence of AEs in the IGU + MTX group was lower than the MTX + LEF group (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.98, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Compared to the MTX alone subgroup, IGU alone offers clear advantages in improving ACR20 and DAS28-ESR, despite the insufficient evidence for DAS28-ESR findings. IGU + MTX shows clear benefits in improving ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and DAS28-ESR scores compared to standard therapies. When the intervention (IGU alone or IGU + MTX) lasted for 52 weeks, it demonstrated superior efficacy in improving ACR20 of patients without prominent adverse events. Notably, IGU or IGU + MTX has apparent advantages in improving ACR20 of first-visit RA, and IGU + MTX has obvious advantages in improving DAS28-ESR of refractory RA. Furthermore, IGU + MTX does not increase the risk of leukopenia, but it can decrease the risk of liver function tests (LFTs), regardless of the age or the stage of RA.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42022295217

The Effect and Safety of Iguratimod Combined With Methotrexate on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease with inflammatory synovitis. Iguratimod (IGU) combined with methotrexate (MTX) therapy may have better efficacy and safety.

Methods: First, we searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IGU + MTX in the treatment of RA through literature databases (such as PubMed, Corkland Library, CNKI, etc.) and then conducted RCT quality assessment and data extraction. Finally, we used RevMan 5.3 for meta-analysis, STATA 15.0 for publication bias assessment, and GRADE tool for the evidence quality assessment of primary outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021220780).

Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 31 RCTs involving 2,776 patients. Compared with MTX alone, the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 of IGU + MTX are higher, while DAS28 is lower [ACR20: (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14–2.13, p = 0.006); ACR50: (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.57–2.65, p < 0.00001); ACR70: (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.44–3.34, p = 0.00003); DAS28: (weighted mean difference (WMD) −1.65, 95% CI −2.39 to −0.91, p < 0.0001)]. Compared with MTX + leflunomide, IGU + MTX has no significant difference in improving ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, but IGU + MTX improves DAS28 more significantly [ACR20: (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.79–1.89, p = 0.59); ACR50: (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.64–1.78, p = 0.81); ACR70: (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.44–3.10, p = 0.76); DAS28: (WMD −0.40, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.38, p < 0.0001)]. Compared with the MTX + tripterygium subgroup and MTX-only subgroup, the incidence of adverse events of the IGU + MTX group is of no statistical significance [MTX only: (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.13, p = 0.90); MTX + Tripterygium: (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.29–1.85, p = 0.50)]. However, compared with MTX + leflunomide, the incidence of adverse events in the IGU + MTX group was lower (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.88, p = 0.0009). The quality of ACR70 was high; the quality of adverse events and ACR50 test was moderate.

Conclusion: Compared with conventional therapy, IGU + MTX may be a safer and more effective therapy for RA patients. When the intervention method is (IGU 25 mg Bid, MTX 10–25 mg once a week), and the intervention lasts for at least 12 weeks, the curative effect may be achieved without obvious adverse events.

Clinical Efficacy of Methotrexate Combined with Iguratimod on Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Influence on the Expression Levels of HOTAIR in Serum

Objective

This study was designed to explore the clinical efficacy of methotrexate combined with iguratimod on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its influence on the expression levels of HOTAIR in serum.

Methods

A total of 268 RA patients were selected as research objects, 145 patients received methotrexate alone were used as a control group (CG), 123 patients received methotrexate combined with iguratimod were taken as a research group (RG), and serum of 60 healthy people undergoing physical examination was selected as a healthy control group (HCG). The therapeutic value of two therapeutic methods for RA was compared, and the HOTAIR expression in serum was detected by qRT-PCR.

Results

Compared with methotrexate used alone, the joint use of methotrexate and iguratimod could provide better clinical efficacy for RA patients and would not increase the incidence of adverse events. HOTAIR was highly expressed in the serum of RA patients, and its expression decreased after treatment.

Conclusion

Combination therapy of methotrexate and iguratimod is a safe and effective way to treat RA patients, which can be popularized clinically.

Effectiveness of iguratimod as monotherapy or combined therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Background

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the iguratimod (IGU) as monotherapy or combined therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CNKI, Wanfang medical network from initial to 30 June, 2020, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Two authors independently screened the studies via reading the title, abstract, and full text. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. STATA 12.0 was used for pooled analysis of all included studies.

Results

A total of 23 RCTs were included in this analysis. Meta-analysis showed that patients in the IGU monotherapy or combined therapy group had significantly higher ACR20 (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.00, P = 0.002), lower DAS28-CRP (SMD = −3.49, 95% CI −5.40 to −1.58, P < 0.001) and DAS28-ESR (SMD = −2.61, 95% CI −3.64 to −1.57, P < 0.001), as well as shorter duration of morning stiffness (SMD = −2.06, 95% CI −2.86 to −1.25, P < 0.001) and lower HAQ score (SMD = −0.91, 95% CI −1.61 to −0.21, P = 0.011), than those received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) monotherapy (primarily comprising methotrexate). For the safety profile, IGU monotherapy had similar risks for gastrointestinal reactions (P = 0.070), leucopenia (P = 0.309), increment in transaminase (P = 0.321), increase of ALT (P = 0.051), and liver damage (P = 0.182) to methotrexate monotherapy, and IGU combined with other DMARDs therapy did not increase the risks of these AEs (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our evidence suggests that IGU is effective and tolerant as monotherapy or combined therapy especially with methotrexate in patients with active RA. IGU may be regarded as a potential alternative to methotrexate, and a preferable choice when combined with other DMARDs for the treatment of RA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02603-2.

Efficacy and safety of iguratimod combined with methotrexate vs. methotrexate alone in rheumatoid arthritis : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) combined with methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Two independent investigators searched for original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the combination of IGU and MTX in RA published before November 1, 2019, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and WanFang Data. Additionally, we searched clinical trial registry websites. We assessed the methodological quality of the included trials using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the seven-point Jadad scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Meta-regression and publication bias analyses were performed using Stata version 14 software (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). A total of 7 RCTs consisting of 665 participants, with 368 participants in the active arm and 297 in the placebo arm, were included in the meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) value was better in the IGU + MTX group than in the MTX alone group, with a pooled relative risk (RR) for ACR20 (American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria), ACR50, and ACR70 of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.13-1.74), 2.09 (95% CI, 1.67-2.61), and 2.24 (95% CI, 1.53-3.28), respectively. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistical significance in adverse events (1.06 (95% CI, 0.92-1.23)). The combined treatment is an effective, safe, and economical treatment option for patients who do not respond well to methotrexate alone or for patients who cannot afford expensive biologics that have no confirmed efficacy.

Iguratimod combination therapy compared with methotrexate monotherapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We estimated the relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod combination therapy compared with methotrexate monotherapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

METHOD

We identified parallel randomized controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases and trial registries for January April 2020. Independent assessment of the risk of bias and grading of the certainty of evidence was performed for the selected trials. We operated RevMan 5 software to compute the meta-analysis. We applied the random-effects model. The statistical methods applied were the Mantel-Haenszel method and the inverse-variance method for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 12 trials involving 1095 participants. Based on our result, patients on iguratimod combination are likely to have 3.53 (95% CI 2.22 to 5.60, moderate-certainty), 3.24, and 2.73 times higher odds for attaining American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) 20, 50, and 70, respectively, than methotrexate monotherapy. Disease state measured using DAS28 score (MD -0.71 score, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.39, very low certainty) and functional ability indicated by HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) (MD -0.23, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.11, very low certainty) may also be better. The combination therapy also produced better results for C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, pain intensity, and patient's and physician's global assessment of disease state. Incidence of adverse events were similar between the groups (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.83, moderate-certainty).

CONCLUSION

Iguratimod combined with methotrexate may be considered a promising alternative for treating RA. Key Points • Iguratimod combination therapy produced better results in all the efficacy outcomes than methotrexate monotherapy. • Iguratimod combination therapy may be as safe as methotrexate monotherapy. • We recommend future clinical trials of iguratimod combination therapy in RA with iguratimod combined with DMARDs other than methotrexate and conducted in diverse population.

Iguratimod promotes transformation of mononuclear macrophages in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis by nuclear factor-κB pathway

BACKGROUND

The role of macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its mechanism have attracted much attention in RA pathogenesis. Macrophages accumulate in the synoviums of RA, and the proportion of M1 type pro-inflammatory macrophages is higher than that of M2 type anti-inflammatory macrophages, leading to the secretion of inflammatory molecules and the aggravation of inflammatory reaction, which has made macrophages a potential target of RA drugs. Iguratimod is a kind of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor that affects macrophage polarity. It is speculated that its anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic effects may be related to the regulation of macrophage M1/M2 ratio.

AIM

To investigate the effects of Iguratimod on the polarity of mononuclear macrophages in elderly patients with RA.

METHODS

Elderly patients with RA and joint effusion were selected, including 10 men and 25 women, with an average age of 66.37 ± 4.42 years. Patients were treated with oral administration of 25 mg Iguratimod (Iremod, State Food and Drug Administration Approval No. H20110084) twice daily for 12 wk. Disease Activity Score 28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire score were collected according to the disease severity before and after treatment. Venous blood and joint effusion fluid were collected, mononuclear macrophages were extracted and expression of cell surface markers CD86, CD64, CD163, and CD206 was analyzed by flow cytometry. The concentration of inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, transforming growth factor-β, and IL-4 in the joint effusion fluid was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Expression of mononuclear cells inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (IκB) and phosphorylated IκB in peripheral blood was analyzed by western blotting.

RESULTS

Disease Activity Score 28 score and Health Assessment Questionnaire score of patients treated with Iguratimod decreased significantly. The percentage of cell surface markers CD86 and CD64 decreased significantly, and the percentage of CD163 and CD206 increased significantly (P < 0.05). The inflammatory factors IL-6 and IL-1β decreased significantly, and transforming growth factor-β and IL-4 increased significantly. Western blot analysis showed that mononuclear cell inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB in peripheral blood was significantly increased after treatment, and its phosphorylation level was significantly decreased (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Iguratimod can promote the transformation of mononuclear macrophages from M1 to M2 in elderly patients with RA by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB pathway, thus improving symptoms of RA.

Effectiveness and safety of iguratimod treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese: A nationwide, prospective real-world study

Background

There is heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations and responses to drugs in RA patients due to variety of factors such as genes and environment. Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), approximately 40% of RA patients still do not achieve primary clinical outcomes in randomized trials, and its low remission rate and high economic consumption remain unresolved, especially in developing countries. Iguratimod (IGU) is a new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) with a low price that has demonstrated good efficacy and safety in clinical trials and was approved for active RA in China and Japan. As the most populous country in the Western Pacific region, it is warranted to conduct a study with a large scale of patients in a real-life setting. Our study confirms the new option for RA patients, which is potentially benificial for public health in developing countries.

Methods

This was a nationwide, prospective real-world study of IGU. Eligible subjects were active adult RA patients who aged 18 to 85 with or without multiple comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes with DMARDs at a stable dosage for at least 12 weeks, or without ongoing DMARDs. A two-stage design was used for this study. In the first stage (the first 12 weeks), IGU 25 mg bid was added as monotherapy or to the background therapy, and in the second stage (the latter 12 weeks), adjustment of RA medicines other than IGU was allowed according to the participants’ disease activity. The primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) 24 weeks and adverse events during 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints were ACR50 and ACR70 over 24 weeks, the changes of DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at week 12 and week 24 from baseline. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01554917.

Findings

Between March 2012 and January 2015, 1759 participants were enrolled, of whom 81•5% (1433/1759) completed the study. Notably, 1597 patients in the full analysis set were assessed for the effectiveness and 1751 patients were in the safety analysis set; 71•9% (1148/1597) of the patients achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 response at week 24, and 51•7% (906/1751) patients had at least 1 adverse event (AE). The incidence of the clinical significant AE (grade≥3) of special interest was 3•4% (54 patients for grade 3 and 6 patients for grade 4), and 0•7% (13/1751) of patients developed SAEs associated with IGU. The most common clinical significant AEs were infection in 0•6% (10/1751) of the patients, abdominal discomfort in 0•5% (9/1751) of the patients including 0•2% (3/1751) gastric ulcer, fracture in 0•4% (7/1751), and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in 0•2% (3/1751) of the patients. The secondary endpoint of ACR50 and ACR70 response rates at week 24 were 47•4% (757/1597) and 24•0% (384/1597). DAS28 was 4•11±1•27 and 3•75±1•32 at week 12 and 24, which was significantly decreased -1•40±1•10 and -1•75±1•26 compared with baseline (P<0•001) respectively. Changes in HAQ at week 12 and 24 from baseline were -7•4 ± 9•18 and -8•5 ± 9•97, respectively (all P<0•001). Stratified analysis results showed that the patients with shorter disease duration, male gender had better response to IGU. There was no significant difference in ACR20/50/70 responses between elderly patients(≥65 years) and younger patients(<65 years), IGU monotherapy or combined with other DMARDs. However, more fractures (1•1% vs 0•5%; P = 0•64) and infections (8•7% vs 7•9%; P = 0•69) were observed in elderly patients in our study.

Interpretation

Our results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of IGU as a new DMARD for active patients with RA as monotherapy or combination therapy.

Funding

This study was supported by “the 11th Five-Year-Plan for Science and Technology Support Program (2012ZX09104-103-01)”.

The Effectiveness and Retention Rate of Iguratimod in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with/without Methotrexate in Daily Medical Care

(1) Background: We evaluated the clinical response of iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) being treated with or without methotrexate (MTX) over 54 weeks. (2) Methods: 106 patients with RA undergoing IGU were retrospectively observed. RA patients were divided into those treated with MTX+IGU (n = 35) and those treated with IGU (n = 71). The primary endpoint was the clinical response of the Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) differences in the changes from baseline to 54 weeks between MTX+IGU and IGU groups. Secondary endpoints, such as the clinical response, retention rate, and safety, were evaluated. (3) Results: The DAS28-CRP difference in the changes between the two groups were −0.2. DAS28-CRP were significantly reduced from the baseline in the MTX+IGU and IGU groups (−1.43 and −1.20 from baseline, respectively). The retention rates were 71.4% in the MTX+IGU groups and 59.2% in the IGU groups (p = 0.16). Adverse events were observed in a total of 6 (17.1%) MTX+IGU patients and 20 (28.2%) IGU patients (p = 0.21). (4) Conclusions: IGU therapy may be a useful treatment option for patients who cannot be treated with MTX.

Iguratimod as a New Drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Landscape

Iguratimod (IGU) is a novel synthetic small molecule disease modified anti-rheumatic drug approved only in Japan and China up to date. IGU plays an important immunomodulatory role in the synovial tissue of rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting the production of immunoglobulins and cytokines and regulating T lymphocyte subsets. IGU also regulates bone metabolism by stimulating bone formation while inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, migration, and bone resorption. In clinical trials, IGU was shown to be superior to placebo and not inferior to salazosulfapyridine. Combined therapy of IGU with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs showed significant improvements for disease activity. IGU has good efficacy and tolerance as an additional treatment for rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. In this review, we summarize current landscape on the mechanism of action of IGU and its clinical effectiveness and safety. It is expected that further translational studies on IGU will pave the road for wider application of IGU in the treatment of autoimmune diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis.

Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data.

RESULTS

We identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD - 0.55, 95% CI - 0.85 to - 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient's and physician's global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis.Key Points• The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases.• Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate.• Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values.• Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.

Molecular mechanisms and clinical application of Iguratimod: A review

Iguratimod (IGU) is a novel small-molecule anti-rheumatic drug with remarkable effectiveness and good safety for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Its mechanism of action is related to its ability to act simultaneously on T and B lymphocytes. IGU can effectively inhibit expression of various inflammatory factors, inhibit B cells from producing immunoglobulins and autoantibodies, downregulate T-cell-mediated cellular immunity, accelerate bone formation, and exert some activity against anti-pulmonary fibrosis. In recent years, IGU has been gradually applied to the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases, such as Sjögren's syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. This article reviews the mechanism of action and clinical research status of IGU, and provides reference for future research on its mechanism of action and clinical application.

Iguratimod: a valuable remedy from the Asia Pacific region for ameliorating autoimmune diseases and protecting bone physiology

Autoimmune diseases are affected by complex pathophysiology involving several cell types, cytokines, antibodies, and mimicking factors. Different drugs are used to ameliorate these autoimmune reactions, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, antiantibodies, and small molecular drugs (DMARDs), and they are clinically in vogue for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, low cost-effectiveness, reduced efficacy, adverse effects, and patient nonresponse are unappealing factors driving the development of new drugs such as iguratimod. Iguratimod is primarily used to ameliorate RA in Japanese and Chinese clinics. However, its efficacy against other autoimmune ailments is also under intense investigation, and the number of investigations is becoming increasingly larger with each passing day. The articular structure comprises synovium, ligaments, and bone. The latter is more complex than the others since it regulates blood cells and autoimmunity in addition to providing skeletal support to the body. Therefore, its protection is also of prime importance in RA and other autoimmune diseases. Herein, we have highlighted the role of iguratimod in autoimmune diseases and bone protection. We suggest that iguratimod’s unique mode of action compared with that of other DMARDs and its good patient response makes it a suitable antirheumatic and bone-protecting drug.

2018 update of the APLAR recommendations for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

AIM

To update recommendations based on current best evidence concerning the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing particularly on the role of targeted therapies, to inform clinicians on new developments that will impact their current practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of relevant literature from 2014 to 2016 concerning targeted therapies in RA was conducted. The RA Update Working Group evaluated the evidence and proposed updated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, to describe the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Recommendations were finalized through consensus using the Delphi technique.

RESULTS

This update provides 16 RA treatment recommendations based on current best evidence and expert clinical opinion. Recommendations 1-3 deal with the use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The next three recommendations (4-6) cover the need for screening and management of infections and comorbid conditions prior to starting targeted therapy, while the following seven recommendations focus on use of these agents. We address choice of targeted therapy, switch, tapering and discontinuation. The last three recommendations elaborate on targeted therapy for RA in special situations such as pregnancy, cancer, and major surgery.

CONCLUSION

Rheumatoid arthritis remains a significant health problem in the Asia-Pacific region. Patients with RA can benefit from the availability of effective targeted therapies, and these updated recommendations provide clinicians with guidance on their use.

The three-year efficacy of iguratimod in clinical daily practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: To assess the middle-term outcome of iguratimod (IGU) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: Sixty-nine RA patients (14 males and 55 females, mean age of 64.0 years) receiving IGU-containing therapies were enrolled. We divided these patients into three groups based on the treatment at the baseline: an IGU group, a methotrexate (MTX) plus IGU group, and a biologics plus IGU group. The baseline characteristics and clinical course were evaluated over three years. Predictive factors associated with the achievement of low disease activity (LDA) were statistically analyzed. Results: The survival rate of IGU therapy at 3 years was 40.6%. The disease activity was significantly decreased in the IGU group and MTX plus IGU group compared with the baseline. Furthermore, 38 patients (55.1%) were in remission or had LDA at 3 years. The patient gender, use of prednisolone (PSL) and DAS28-CRP at baseline were the factors associated with the achievement of remission or LDA at three years. Conclusion: IGU was effective without MTX or bDMARDs as well as in combination with MTX. A female gender, no use of PSL and a low DAS28-CRP at the initiation of IGU were associated with clinical remission or LDA achievement at three years.

Novel disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug iguratimod suppresses chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by down-regulating activation of macrophages/microglia through an NF-κB pathway

We aimed to elucidate the effects of iguratimod, a widely used anti-rheumatic drug with no severe side effects, on chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Iguratimod was orally administered to mice immunised with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide 35–55. Preventive administration of iguratimod from the time of immunisation was found to markedly reduce the clinical severity of acute and chronic EAE. Pathologically, iguratimod treatment significantly reduced demyelination and infiltration of CD3⁺ T, F4/80⁺, and CD169⁺ cells into the spinal cord, and suppressed macrophage/microglia activation in the parenchyma at the acute and chronic stages compared with vehicle treatment. Therapeutic administration of iguratimod after the onset of clinical symptoms significantly ameliorated the clinical severity of chronic EAE and reduced demyelination, T helper (Th)1/Th17 cell infiltration, macrophage/microglia activation, and nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the spinal cord. In vitro, iguratimod treatment inhibited nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 and down-regulated pro-inflammatory responses in macrophages and microglia. Our results suggest that iguratimod ameliorates acute and chronic EAE by suppressing inflammatory cell infiltration and immune cell activation, partly through inhibition of NF-κB p65, supporting the therapeutic potential of this drug for not only acute, but also chronic MS.

Effects of iguratimod on the levels of circulating regulators of bone remodeling and bone remodeling markers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

This study aims to investigate the effect of iguratimod, a novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, alone or combined with methotrexate (MTX), on the serum levels of regulators of bone remodeling (receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1)) and bone remodeling markers (C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP)) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with RA were treated with iguratimod, MTX, or their combination for 12 months. Serum samples were collected before treatment and 6 and 12 months afterwards. RANKL, OPG, DKK-1, CTX-I, and PINP levels were measured, and radiographic progression was assessed. The serum RANKL levels decreased after treatment for 6 and 12 months with iguratimod (median: baseline 565.00 pmol/L vs. 6 months 411.00 pmol/L vs. 12 months 212.00 pmol/L), MTX (median: baseline 562.50 pmol/L vs. 6 months 399.50 pmol/L vs. 12 months 163.50 pmol/L), and their combination (median: baseline 971.00 pmol/L vs. 6 months 272.50 pmol/L vs. 12 months 241.50 pmol/L). Combination therapy showed greater effects 6 months post-treatment compared to single-drug therapy. PINP levels increased significantly 12 months post-treatment with all therapies, but only the combination therapy led to decreased CTX-I levels. OPG and DKK-1 levels showed no significant changes. The three treatments showed no significant differences in radiographic progression. Iguratimod could stimulate bone formation and regulate the RANKL/RANK/OPG system rather than DKK-1levels. Its effects are comparable to those of MTX, and combination therapy showed stronger effects.