1
|
Wetzel K, Clauss M, Joeris A, Kates S, Morgenstern M. Health-related quality of life and mental health in patients with major bone and joint infections. Bone Jt Open 2024; 5:721-728. [PMID: 39216844 PMCID: PMC11365735 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.59.bjo-2024-0072.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims It is well described that patients with bone and joint infections (BJIs) commonly experience significant functional impairment and disability. Published literature is lacking on the impact of BJIs on mental health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the impact on mental health in patients with BJIs. Methods The AO Trauma Infection Registry is a prospective multinational registry. In total, 229 adult patients with long-bone BJI were enrolled between 1 November 2012 and 31 August 2017 in 18 centres from ten countries. Clinical outcome data, demographic data, and details on infections and treatments were collected. Patient-reported outcomes using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), Parker Mobility Score, and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living were assessed at one, six, and 12 months. The SF-36 mental component subscales were analyzed and correlated with infection characteristics and clinical outcome. Results The SF-36 physical component summary mean at baseline was 30.9 (95% CI 29.7 to 32.0). At one month, it was unchanged (30.5; 95% CI 29.5 to 31.5; p = 0.447); it had improved statistically significantly at six months (35.5; 95% CI 34.2 to 36.7; p < 0.001) and at 12 months (37.9; 95% CI 36.4 to 39.3; p < 0.001). The SF-36 mental component summary mean at baseline was 42.5 (95% CI 40.8 to 44.2). At one month, it was unchanged (43.1; 95% CI 41.4 to 44.8; p = 0.458); it had improved statistically significantly at six months (47.1; 95% CI 45.4 to 48.7; p < 0.001) and at 12 months (46.7; 95% CI 45.0 to 48.5; p < 0.001). All mental subscales had improved by the end of the study, but mental health status remained compromised in comparison with the average USA population. Conclusion BJIs considerably impact HRQoL, particularly mental health. Patients suffering from BJIs reported considerable limitations in their daily and social activities due to psychological problems. Impaired mental health may be explained by the chronic nature of BJIs, and therefore the mental wellbeing of these patients should be monitored closely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katinka Wetzel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Clauss
- Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephen Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia, USA
| | - Mario Morgenstern
- Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tilch K, Hopff SM, Appel K, Kraus M, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Pilgram L, Anton G, Berger S, Geisler R, Haas K, Illig T, Krefting D, Lorbeer R, Mitrov L, Muenchhoff M, Nauck M, Pley C, Reese JP, Rieg S, Scherer M, Stecher M, Stellbrink C, Valentin H, Winter C, Witzenrath M, Vehreschild JJ. Ethical and coordinative challenges in setting up a national cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:84. [PMID: 37848886 PMCID: PMC10583323 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00959-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
With the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), global researchers were confronted with major challenges. The German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON) was launched in fall 2020 to effectively leverage resources and bundle research activities in the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We analyzed the setup phase of NAPKON as an example for multicenter studies in Germany, highlighting challenges and optimization potential in connecting 59 university and nonuniversity study sites. We examined the ethics application process of 121 ethics submissions considering durations, annotations, and outcomes. Study site activation and recruitment processes were investigated and related to the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections. For all initial ethics applications, the median time to a positive ethics vote was less than two weeks and 30 of these study sites (65%) joined NAPKON within less than three weeks each. Electronic instead of postal ethics submission (9.5 days (Q1: 5.75, Q3: 17) vs. 14 days (Q1: 11, Q3: 26), p value = 0.01) and adoption of the primary ethics vote significantly accelerated the ethics application process. Each study center enrolled a median of 37 patients during the 14-month observation period, with large differences depending on the health sector. We found a positive correlation between recruitment performance and COVID-19 incidence as well as hospitalization incidence. Our analysis highlighted the challenges and opportunities of the federated system in Germany. Digital ethics application tools, adoption of a primary ethics vote and standardized formal requirements lead to harmonized and thus faster study initiation processes during a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Tilch
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Sina M Hopff
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katharina Appel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Monika Kraus
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Epidemiology, Research Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bettina Lorenz-Depiereux
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Epidemiology, Research Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Munich, Germany
| | - Lisa Pilgram
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabi Anton
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Epidemiology, Research Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Munich, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Berger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ramsia Geisler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kirsten Haas
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- University Hospital Würzburg, Institute for Medical Data Science (ImDS), Josef-Schneider Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Illig
- Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dagmar Krefting
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Roberto Lorbeer
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lazar Mitrov
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Muenchhoff
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Max Von Pettenkofer Institute & GeneCenter, Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Nauck
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christina Pley
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens-Peter Reese
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- University Hospital Würzburg, Institute for Medical Data Science (ImDS), Josef-Schneider Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rieg
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Margarete Scherer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Melanie Stecher
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner-Site Cologne-Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Stellbrink
- Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Klinikum Bielefeld, Academic Department of Cardiology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Heike Valentin
- Trusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christof Winter
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM, Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Witzenrath
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Berlin, Germany
| | - J Janne Vehreschild
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner-Site Cologne-Bonn, Cologne, Germany
- Department I for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sherchand SP, Adhikari RP, Muthukrishnan G, Kanipakala T, Owen JR, Xie C, Aman MJ, Proctor RA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL. Evidence of Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Anti-Glucosaminidase Antibodies in Patients With S. Aureus Osteomyelitis and Their Association With Clinical Outcome Following Surgery in a Clinical Pilot. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:876898. [PMID: 35923804 PMCID: PMC9339635 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.876898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis remains a very challenging condition; recent clinical studies have shown infection control rates following surgery/antibiotics to be ~60%. Additionally, prior efforts to produce an effective S. aureus vaccine have failed, in part due to lack of knowledge of protective immunity. Previously, we demonstrated that anti-glucosaminidase (Gmd) antibodies are protective in animal models but found that only 6.7% of culture-confirmed S. aureus osteomyelitis patients in the AO Clinical Priority Program (AO-CPP) Registry had basal serum levels (>10 ng/ml) of anti-Gmd at the time of surgery (baseline). We identified a small subset of patients with high levels of anti-Gmd antibodies and adverse outcomes following surgery, not explained by Ig class switching to non-functional isotypes. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that clinical cure following surgery is associated with anti-Gmd neutralizing antibodies in serum. Therefore, we first optimized an in vitro assay that quantifies recombinant Gmd lysis of the M. luteus cell wall and used it to demonstrate the 50% neutralizing concentration (NC50) of a humanized anti-Gmd mAb (TPH-101) to be ~15.6 μg/ml. We also demonstrated that human serum deficient in anti-Gmd antibodies can be complemented by TPH-101 to achieve the same dose-dependent Gmd neutralizing activity as purified TPH-101. Finally, we assessed the anti-Gmd physical titer and neutralizing activity in sera from 11 patients in the AO-CPP Registry, who were characterized into four groups post-hoc. Group 1 patients (n=3) had high anti-Gmd physical and neutralizing titers at baseline that decreased with clinical cure of the infection over time. Group 2 patients (n=3) had undetectable anti-Gmd antibodies throughout the study and adverse outcomes. Group 3 (n=3) had high titers +/- neutralizing anti-Gmd at baseline with adverse outcomes. Group 4 (n=2) had low titers of non-neutralizing anti-Gmd at baseline with delayed high titers and adverse outcomes. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that both neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-Gmd antibodies exist in S. aureus osteomyelitis patients and that screening for these antibodies could have a value for identifying patients in need of passive immunization prior to surgery. Future prospective studies to test the prognostic value of anti-Gmd antibodies to assess the potential of passive immunization with TPH-101 are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | | | - John R. Owen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Chao Xie
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - M. Javad Aman
- Integrated BioTherapeutics, Inc., Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Richard A. Proctor
- Departments of Medical Microbiology/Immunology and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Edward M. Schwarz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazem M, Sheikhtaheri A. Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:97. [PMID: 35410297 PMCID: PMC9004114 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A Disease Registry System (DRS) is a system that collects standard data on a specific disease with an organized method for specific purposes in a population. Barriers and facilitators for DRSs are different according to the health system of each country, and identifying these factors is necessary to improve DRSs, so the purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize these factors. Methods First, by conducting 13 interviews with DRS specialists, barriers and facilitators for DRSs were identified and then, a questionnaire was developed to prioritize these factors. Then, 15 experts answered the questionnaires. We prioritized these factors based on the mean of scores in four levels including first priority (3.76–5), second priority (2.51–3.75), third priority (1.26–2.50), and the fourth priority (1–1.25). Results At first, 139 unique codes (63 barriers and 76 facilitators) were extracted from the interviews. We classified barriers into 9 themes, including management problems (24 codes), data collection-related problems (8 codes), poor cooperation/coordination (7 codes), technological problems and lack of motivation/interest (6 codes for each), threats to ethics/data security/confidentiality (5 codes), data quality-related problems (3 codes), limited patients’ participation and lack of or non-use of standards (2 codes for each). We also classified facilitators into 9 themes including management facilitators (36 codes), improving data quality (8 codes), proper data collection and observing ethics/data security/confidentiality (7 codes for each), appropriate technology (6 codes), increasing patients’ participation, increasing motivation/interest, improving cooperation/coordination, and the use of standards (3 codes for each). The first three ranked barriers based on mean scores included poor stakeholder cooperation/coordination (4.30), lack of standards (4.26), and data quality-related problems (4.06). The first three ranked facilitators included improving data quality (4.54), increasing motivation/interest (4.48), and observing ethics/data security/confidentiality (4.36). Conclusion Stakeholders’ coordination, proper data management, standardization and observing ethics, security/confidentiality are the most important areas for planning and investment that managers must consider for the continuation and success of DRSs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Lazem
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Sheikhtaheri
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lipof JS, Jones CMC, Daiss J, Oh I. Comparative study of culture, next-generation sequencing, and immunoassay for identification of pathogen in diabetic foot ulcer. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:2638-2645. [PMID: 33543785 PMCID: PMC8339135 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of deep musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) begins with accurate identification of the offending pathogen, surgical excision/debridement, and a course of culture-directed antibiotics. Despite this, the incidence of recurrent infection continues to rise. A major contributor to this is inaccurate or negative initial cultures. Accurate identification of the main pathogen is paramount to treatment success. This is especially important in treating diabetic foot infections (DFIs) with limb salvage efforts. This study seeks to utilize standard culture, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and immunoassay for newly synthesized antibodies (NSA) to Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae for diagnosis. This is a level II prospective observational study approved by our IRB. Thirty patients > 18 years of age who presented with a DFI and underwent surgical debridement or amputation by a single academic orthopedic surgeon from October 2018 to September 2019 were enrolled. Intraoperative samples were obtained from the base of the wound and sent for culture, NGS, and a peripheral blood sample was obtained at the time of diagnosis. NGS and culture were highly correlated for S. aureus (κ = 0.86) and S. agalactiae (κ = 1.0), NSA immunoassay and culture demonstrated a fair correlation for S. aureus (κ = 0.18) and S. agalactiae (κ = 0.67), and NGS and NSA immunoassay demonstrated fair correlation for S. aureus (κ = 0.1667) and S. agalactiae (κ = 0.67). Our study demonstrates a high concordance between culture and NGS in identifying the dominant pathogen in DFU. NGS may be a useful adjunct in DFI diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Scott Lipof
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Courtney Marie Cora Jones
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, Orthopaedics, and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - John Daiss
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Irvin Oh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fu W, He W, Ren Y, Li Z, Liu J, Liu Y, Xie Z, Xu J, Bi Q, Kong M, Lee CC, Daiss JL, Muthukrishnan G, Owen JR, Kates SL, Peng J, Xie C. Distinct expression trend of signature antigens of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis correlated with clinical outcomes. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:265-273. [PMID: 33336817 PMCID: PMC7946439 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The major limitations of clinical outcome predictions of osteomyelitis mediated by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) are not specific and definitive. To this end, current studies aim to investigate host immune responses of trend changes of the iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) of IsdA, IsdB, IsdH, cell wall-modifying proteins of amidase (Amd) and glucosaminidase (Gmd), and secreted virulence factor of chemotaxis inhibitory protein S. aureus (CHIPS) and staphylococcal complement inhibitor (SCIN) longitudinally to discover their correlationship with clinical outcomes. A total of 55 patients with confirmed S. aureus infection of the long bone by clinical and laboratory methods were recruited for the study. Whole blood was collected at 0, 6, 12 months for the serum that was used to test IsdA, IsdB, IsdH, Gmd, Amd, CHIPS, and SCIN using a customized Luminex assay after clinical standard care parameters were collected. The patients were then divided into two groups: (1) infection controlled versus (2) adverse outcome based on clinical criteria for statistical analysis. We found that standard clinical parameters were unable to distinguish therapeutic outcomes. Significant overexpression of all antigens was confirmed in infection patients at 0-, 6-, and 12-month time points. A distinct expression trend and dynamic changes of IsdB, Amd, Gmd, and CHIPS were observed between infection controlled and adverse outcome patients, while the IsdA, IsdH, SCIN remained demonstrated no statistical significance. We conclude that dynamic changes of specific antigens could predict clinical outcomes of S. aureus osteomyelitis. Clinical Relevance: The trend changes of host immune responses to S. aureus specific antigens of IsdB, Gmd, Amd, and CHIPS could predict clinical outcomes of S. aureus osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Fu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,The authors contributed equally
| | - Wenbin He
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,The authors contributed equally
| | - Youliang Ren
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China
| | - Zhengdao Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China
| | - Jinyue Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China
| | - Zhao Xie
- Department of Orthopaedic, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – SHTMMU &URMC), Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – SHTMMU &URMC), Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China
| | - Jianzhong Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – SHTMMU &URMC), Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – SHTMMU &URMC), Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China
| | - Qing Bi
- Department of Orthopaedic, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZPPH &URMC), Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Hangzhou, 310024 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZPPH &URMC), Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Hangzhou, 310024 China
| | - Mingxiang Kong
- Department of Orthopaedic, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZPPH &URMC), Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Hangzhou, 310024 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZPPH &URMC), Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Hangzhou, 310024 China
| | - Charles C. Lee
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642
| | - John L. Daiss
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642
| | - Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642
| | - John R. Owen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298
| | - Stephen L. Kates
- Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298
| | - Jiachen Peng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr. Chao Xie, The Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, Phone 585-275-0818, FAX 585-276-2177, or Dr. Jiachen Peng, Department of Orthopaedics First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University Zunyi, 563003 China,
| | - Chao Xie
- Joint Orthopaedic, Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical Center (JORC – ZMU&URMC), First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003 China,Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr. Chao Xie, The Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, Phone 585-275-0818, FAX 585-276-2177, or Dr. Jiachen Peng, Department of Orthopaedics First Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University Zunyi, 563003 China,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morgenstern M, Erichsen C, Militz M, Xie Z, Peng J, Stannard J, Metsemakers W, Schaefer D, Alt V, Søballe K, Nerlich M, Buckley RE, Blauth M, Suk M, Leung F, Barla JD, Yukata K, Qing B, Kates SL. The AO trauma CPP bone infection registry: Epidemiology and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bone infection. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:136-146. [PMID: 32720352 PMCID: PMC7749080 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Bone infection represents a serious complication of orthopedic surgery and Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen. To improve the understanding of host-pathogen interaction, we developed a biospecimen registry (AO Trauma CPP Bone Infection Registry) to collect clinical data, bacterial isolates, and serum from patients with S. aureus bone infection. A prospective multinational registry with a 12-month follow-up was created to include adult patients (18 years or older) with culture-confirmed S. aureus infection in long bones after fracture fixation or arthroplasty. Baseline patient attributes and details on infections and treatments were recorded. Blood and serum samples were obtained at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at 1, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcomes were recorded. Two hundred and ninety-two patients with fracture-related infection (n = 157, 53.8%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 86, 29.5%), and osteomyelitis (n = 49, 16.8%) were enrolled. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was detected in 82 patients (28.4%), with the highest proportion found among patients from North American sites (n = 39, 48.8%) and the lowest from Central European sites (n = 18, 12.2%). Patient outcomes improved at 6 and 12 months in comparison to baseline. The SF-36 physical component summary mean (95% confidence interval) score, however, did not reach 50 at 12 months. The cure rate at the end of the study period was 62.1%. Although patients improved with treatment, less than two-thirds were cured in 1 year. At 12-month follow-up, patient-reported outcome scores were worse for patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Morgenstern
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland,Department of Trauma SurgeryBG Unfallklinik MurnauMurnauGermany
| | | | - Matthias Militz
- Department of Trauma SurgeryBG Unfallklinik MurnauMurnauGermany
| | - Zhao Xie
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest HospitalThird Military Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Jiachen Peng
- Department of OrthopedicsAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China; Joint Orthopaedic Research Center of Zunyi Medical University & University of Rochester Medical CenterZunyiChina
| | - James Stannard
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Missouri, Missouri Orthopaedic InstituteColumbiaMissouri
| | | | - Dirk Schaefer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand SurgeryUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Volker Alt
- Department of Trauma SurgeryUniversity Hospital Giessen, Justus‐Liebig University GiessenGiessenGermany,Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, SportsmedicineUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgGermany
| | - Kjeld Søballe
- Department of OrthopaedicsAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Michael Nerlich
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, SportsmedicineUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgGermany
| | - Richard E. Buckley
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Michael Blauth
- Department of Trauma SurgeryMedical University InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | - Michael Suk
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryGeisinger Medical CenterDanvillePennsylvania
| | - Frankie Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary HospitalThe University of Hong KongPokfulam RoadHong Kong
| | - Jorge D. Barla
- Department of Orthopedic TraumaHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
| | - Kiminori Yukata
- Department of OrthopaedicsHamawaki Orthopaedic HospitalNakakuHiroshimaJapan
| | - Bi Qing
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryZhejiang Provincial People's HospitalZhejiangHangzhouChina
| | - Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kates SL, Owen JR, Beck CA, Xie C, Muthukrishnan G, Daiss JL, Schwarz EM. Lack of Humoral Immunity Against Glucosaminidase Is Associated with Postoperative Complications in Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:1842-1848. [PMID: 32858560 PMCID: PMC9018051 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glucosaminidase (Gmd) is known to be a protective antigen in animal models of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. We compared the endogenous anti-Gmd antibody levels in sera of patients with culture-confirmed S. aureus bone infections to their sera at 1 year after operative treatment of the infection. METHODS A novel global biospecimen registry of 297 patients with deep-wound culture-confirmed S. aureus osteomyelitis was analyzed to assess relationships between baseline anti-Gmd serum titers (via custom Luminex assay), known host risk factors for infection, and 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes (e.g., infection control, inconclusive, refracture, persistent infection, septic nonunion, amputation, and septic death). RESULTS All patients had measurable humoral immunity against some S. aureus antigens, but only 20 patients (6.7%; p < 0.0001) had high levels of anti-Gmd antibodies (>10 ng/mL) in serum at baseline. A subset of 194 patients (65.3%) who completed 1 year of follow-up was divided into groups based on anti-Gmd level: low (<1 ng/mL, 54 patients; 27.8%), intermediate (<10 ng/mL, 122 patients; 62.9%), and high (>10 ng/mL, 18 patients; 9.3%), and infection control rates were 40.7%, 50.0%, and 66.7%, respectively. The incidence of adverse outcomes in these groups was 33.3%, 16.4%, and 11.1%, respectively. Assessing anti-Gmd level as a continuous variable showed a 60% reduction in adverse-event odds (p = 0.04) for every tenfold increase in concentration. No differences in patient demographics, body mass index of >40 kg/m, diabetes status, age of ≥70 years, male sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index of >1, or Cierny-Mader host type were observed between groups, and these risk factors were not associated with adverse events. Patients with low anti-Gmd titer demonstrated a significant 2.68-fold increased odds of adverse outcomes (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Deficiency in circulating anti-Gmd antibodies was associated serious adverse outcomes following operative treatment of S. aureus osteomyelitis. At 1 year, high levels of anti-Gmd antibodies were associated with a nearly 3-fold increase in infection-control odds. Additional prospective studies clarifying Gmd immunization for osteomyelitis are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - John R. Owen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Christopher A. Beck
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Chao Xie
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | | | - John L. Daiss
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Edward M. Schwarz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee CC, Southgate R, Jiao C, Gersz E, Owen JR, Kates SL, Beck CA, Xie C, Daiss JL, Post V, Moriarty TF, Zeiter S, Schwarz EM, Muthukrishnan G. Deriving a dose and regimen for anti-glucosaminidase antibody passive-immunisation for patients with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. Eur Cell Mater 2020; 39:96-107. [PMID: 32003439 PMCID: PMC7236896 DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v039a06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) osteomyelitis remains a major clinical problem. Anti-glucosaminidase (Gmd) antibodies (1C11) are efficacious in prophylactic and therapeutic murine models. Feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetics of 1C11 passive immunisation in sheep and endogenous anti-Gmd levels were quantified in osteomyelitis patients. 3 sheep received a 500 mg intravenous (i.v.) bolus of 1C11 and its levels in sera were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) over 52 d. A humanised anti-Gmd monoclonal antibody, made by grafting the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) portion of 1C11 onto the fragment crystallisable region (Fc) of human IgG1, was used to make a standard curve of mean fluorescent intensity versus concentration of anti-Gmd. Anti-Gmd serum levels were determined in 297 patients with culture-confirmed S. aureus osteomyelitis and 40 healthy controls. No complications or adverse events were associated with the sheep 1C11 i.v. infusion and the estimated circulating half-life of 1C11 was 23.7 d. Endogenous anti-Gmd antibody levels in sera of osteomyelitis patients ranged from < 1 ng/mL to 300 µg/mL, with a mean concentration of 21.7 µg/mL. The estimated circulating half-life of endogenous anti-Gmd antibodies in sera of 12 patients with cured osteomyelitis was 120.4 d. A clinically relevant administration of anti-Gmd (500 mg i.v. = 7 mg/kg/70 kg human) was safe in sheep. This dose was 8 times more than the endogenous anti-Gmd levels observed in osteomyelitis patients and was predicted to have a half-life of > 3 weeks. Anti-Gmd passive immunisation has potential to prevent and treat S. aureus osteomyelitis. Further clinical development is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C. Lee
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Richard Southgate
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Cindy Jiao
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Elaine Gersz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - John R. Owen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Christopher A. Beck
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Chao Xie
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - John L. Daiss
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Edward M. Schwarz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,Corresponding Author: Edward M. Schwarz, Ph.D., Burton Professor of Orthopaedics, Director of Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, Phone: (585) 275-3063, FAX: (585) 276-2177,
| | | |
Collapse
|