Risankizumab in real life: preliminary results of efficacy and safety in psoriasis during a 16-week period

Nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus: Updates on diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory diseases of the nail, including nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus, are associated with significant disease burden and have a negative impact on quality of life. Diagnosis is often delayed, especially when patients present without cutaneous findings. Therefore, recognizing clinical signs and symptoms of inflammatory nail diseases, and initiating timely and appropriate treatment, is of utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE

We review recent studies on diagnostic techniques, discuss severity grading and scoring systems, and describe consensus treatment recommendations for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

METHODS

An updated literature review was performed using the PubMed database on studies assessing diagnostic techniques or treatment modalities for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

RESULTS

Recent studies on diagnostic techniques for inflammatory nail disease have focused on use of dermoscopy, capillaroscopy, and ultrasound modalities. Treatment of these conditions is dichotomized into involvement of few (≤3) or many (>3) nails. Recent psoriatic therapeutics studied for nail outcomes include brodalumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab, deucravacitinib, and bimekizumab, while emerging treatments for nail lichen planus include JAK inhibitors and intralesional platelet rich plasma injections.

CONCLUSIONS

We emphasize the need for increased awareness and expanded management strategies for inflammatory nail diseases to improve patient outcomes.

Guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab in a real-world setting: drug survival and effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown promising results for interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. The drugs have been used in clinical practice since 2017.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the drug survival and effectiveness of interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated with either guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab at the Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, during the period from June 11 2018, to July 14 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included. During the study, 19 patients discontinued treatment with an interleukin-23 inhibitor, and mean treatment duration (SD) was 61.4 weeks (43.7). Seventy-six patients (95%) had previous use of ≥1 biologic. One-year drug survival was 81.0%. Among patients, 64.3% achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 at weeks 12-17; 61.3%, at weeks 40-60. There was no statistically significant difference between the drugs regarding the chance of achieving PASI ≤ 2 (p>.05). Twenty-two patients (27.5%) had PsA. Among these, 40.9% and 36.4% achieved complete remission and partial remission, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interleukin-23 inhibitors appear to have high and similar drug survival and effectiveness in patients with difficult-to-treat psoriasis and PsA.

Drug Utilization and Measurement of Medication Adherence: A Real World Study of Psoriasis in Italy

Exceptional advances have been made with systemic treatment for psoriasis (PSO). However, that disease still represents a heavy burden in terms of impact on healthcare systems worldwide. This study comprehensively assesses medication adherence in a real world setting in Italy across all phases-initiation, implementation, and persistence-of PSO therapies. By distinguishing between switches and swaps, it provides unique insights into the patient's own approach to prescribed therapy as well as clinical decision-making processes, enhancing our understanding of medication adherence and discontinuation in a real world daily setting. The study's refined methodology for assessing persistence, considering variations in refill gaps and complex dosing regimens, shows that anti-interleukin (IL) therapies are associated with longer periods of adherence compared with other available therapeutic strategies. Among the selected drugs, ixekizumab and secukinumab were the ones with higher rate of treatment adherence at the expense of anti-TNF-α and anti-PDE4 agents. Notably, patients who opt for swaps are approximately 2.8 times more likely to discontinue their PSO therapy within one year. These findings carry practical implications for optimizing medication adherence, including tailored patient counseling, monitoring, and therapeutic adjustments, highlighting the need for a comprehensive and patient-centered approach to managing these conditions.

Efficacy and Safety of Nail Psoriasis Targeted Therapies: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Nail changes are frequent clinical findings in patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, often causing significant impairments in quality of life. Numerous targeted therapies have been previously studied for treatment of nail psoriasis, however, newer agents have not been captured in prior systematic reviews. With over 25 new studies published since 2020, the landscape of nail psoriasis systemic treatments is rapidly evolving, warranting analysis of recently approved therapies.

METHODS

An updated systematic review of all PubMed and OVID database studies assessing efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for nail psoriasis was performed, with the goal of incorporating clinical data of recent trials and newer agents, namely brodalumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies reporting at least one of the nail psoriasis clinical appearance outcomes (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index, modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index).

RESULTS

A total of 68 studies on 15 nail psoriasis targeted therapeutic agents were included. Biological agents and small molecule inhibitors included TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab), IL-17 inhibitors (ixekizumab, brodalumab, secukinumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab), PDE-4 inhibitors (apremilast), and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib). These agents all demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nail outcome scores, compared with placebo or with baseline values, at weeks 10-16 and weeks 20-26, with some studies assessing efficacy up to week 60. Safety data for these agents were acceptable and consistent with known safety profiles within these timepoints, with nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions, headache, and diarrhea being the most reported adverse events. Specifically, the newer agents, brodalumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, showed promising outcomes for treatment of nail psoriasis on the basis of current data.

CONCLUSION

Numerous targeted therapies have shown significant efficacy in improving nail findings in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Data from head-to-head trials have shown greater efficacy of ixekizumab over adalimumab and ustekinumab, as well as brodalumab over ustekinumab, while prior meta-analyses have demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab and tofacitinib to other included agents at various assessed timepoints. Further studies on the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents, as well as randomized controlled trials involving comparison with placebo arms, are needed to fully analyze differences in efficacy of newer agents compared with previously established therapies.

Pharmacovigilance of Risankizumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis and Arthritic Psoriasis: Real-World Data from EudraVigilance Database

Risankizumab is a selective, humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal anti-body directed against interleukin (IL)-23 protein. The therapeutic indication of risankizumab is moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The safety profile of risankizumab is currently defined by data obtained with clinical trials used for the authorization of entry into the market. The aim of this study was to expand information on the safety of risankizumab through a descriptive post-marketing analysis of real-world data regarding serious adverse reactions (SARs) to risankizumab found in the EudraVigilance database. The EudraVigilance database system, containing SARs linked to drugs not yet licensed for the market in the European Union (EU), was used. In EudraVigilance, SARs are described in single individual cases safety reports (ICSRs). More frequently reported serious SARs to risankizumab are associated with, in descending order, infections, cancer, nervous system disorders, cardiac disorders, abnormal laboratory results, pulmonary disorders, conditions aggravated, and skin disorders. Despite the classical limitations of this post-marketing study (lack of denominator, no certainty of causal relationship between the drug and the adverse reaction), analysis of real-world data related to SARs to risankizumab confirms the known safety profile of the drug but, at the same time, stimulates to further go into detail about the occurrence as adverse reactions of malignancies and their sex distribution.

Clinical effectiveness of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors on difficult-to-treat psoriasis areas (scalp, genital, and palmoplantar sites): a retrospective, observational, single-center, real-life study

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis affecting the genital, palmoplantar, and scalp regions is recognized as difficult-to-treat, and data on the efficacy of biologics in these areas remains limited.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-center study evaluated the effectiveness of anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents on scalp, genital, and palmoplantar psoriasis. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients with psoriasis being treated with IL inhibitors at our clinic. Effectiveness was evaluated at 16, 28, and 52 weeks, according to the achievement of relative and mean PSSI, PGA-G, and ppPASI.

RESULTS

In all, 308 patients showed involvement of the scalp, 136 in the genital area, and 94 in the palmoplantar regions. On scalp psoriasis, anti-IL-17 agents demonstrated superiority in disease control compared to anti-IL-23 agents. PSSI100 at week 16 was reached by 59% of patients on an anti-IL17 vs 39.8% on an anti-IL-23 (p < 0.003). At genital sites, no significant differences between anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents were observed, and all classes achieved PGA-G 0/1. No significant differences between anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents were observed in palmoplantar areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data support the utility of both anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents for the treatment of difficult-to-treat areas in patients with psoriasis. Anti-IL-17 agents achieved better control of scalp psoriasis.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 2-Year Real-Life Retrospective Study

Risankizumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL23 and has been recently approved by the EMA and the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. Its efficacy and safety have been reported by clinical trials and real-life studies. However, even if long-term data from trials have already been reported (up to 172 weeks), data on long-term real-life experiences are still limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term (2 years) efficacy and safety of risankizumab for psoriasis management in a real-life setting. A monocentric retrospective study was performed, enrolling 168 patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis who were undergoing treatment with risankizumab. Psoriasis severity and safety outcomes were evaluated at each follow-up visit (week 16, week 28, week 52, week 88, week 104). A statistically significant reduction of psoriasis severity scores was reported from week 16 and was maintained up to week 104. Moreover, interesting results in terms of safety have been collected, without any serious adverse events registered. Our long-term real-life monocentric retrospective study confirmed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab up to 104 weeks of treatment. However, further studies are required to confirm our results and to increase available data to establish the best evidence-based biologic selection algorithm.

Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Patient with Chronic HBV Infection

The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. However, safety concerns still remain, particularly on patient affected by opportunistic infections. In this scenario, the safety of biologic drugs in patient with HBV infection is debated. Globally, screening for hepatitis before starting biological treatment is mandatory as well as a referral to an infectivologist and eventual prophylactic management should be evaluated case by case, also considering risk factors. On the one hand, the use of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor seems to increase the risk of HBV reactivation, conversely, the use of recently approved classes of biologics [anti-interleukin (IL) 17 and anti-IL23] seems to have a lower risk of HBV reactivation. However, the evidence on the safety of anti-IL23 drugs in patients affected by HBV is scant, particularly for patients undergoing treatment with tildrakizumab. Herein, we report the first case of a female patient affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis, successfully treated with tildrakizumab without reporting hepatitis reactivation. Even if limited, our case seems to confirm available evidence about the safety of anti-IL23, particularly tildrakizumab, on patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis.

Anti-IL23 biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: real-world experience versus clinical trials data

Nowadays, the biological equipment available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis is plenty. Anti-interleukin-23 represents the latest class of biologic approved for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Their efficacy and safety have been assessed through two major sources: clinical trials (CTs) and real-world experiences data (RWE). Notably, the two sources differ from one another, but together, they complement information and current knowledge on both efficacy and safety of biological therapy. We carry out a review on CTs and RWE reports on the latest group of biological approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: anti-IL23 (guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab).

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part II: focus on elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis is becoming a frequent concern in geriatric age due to the higher risk to develop treatment adverse events, logistic issues, vulnerability to immune-related diseases and cancer, presence of comorbidities and the risk of drug interactions. In this context, traditional systemic treatments are often contraindicated, and biologic drugs and small molecules seem to be a valuable option. However, data on their effectiveness and safety in elderly patients are scant.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature in order to point out data on the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and small molecules for the management of psoriasis in elderly patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review suggests biologics and small molecules as an effective and safe option for the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis in elderly patients.

Effectiveness of risankizumab in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis: a 52-week Italian real-life experience

Background

Data on the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis (PP) are scarce, representing a therapeutic challenge. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in a population of patients with psoriasis with a palmoplantar involvement, over a 52-week treatment period.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients with PP, with or without involvement of other skin sites. Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (ppPASI) was assessed at baseline and after 4, 16, 28 and 52 weeks, to evaluate the PP severity.

Results

Sixteen patients were enrolled. The rates of ppPASI90 responses constantly increased during the period of observation and were 18.7%, 62.2%, 75.0% and 81.2% at weeks 4, 16, 28 and 52, respectively. Only two patients suspended treatment because of ineffectiveness at week 16.

Conclusion

Our data from a series of 16 patients reveal that risankizumab could represent an effective and safe therapeutic choice in patients with PP.

Bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy for psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease prone to recurrence. Some studies indicated that bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy had been proposed as a treatment strategy for psoriasis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of this combination therapy in reducing the severity of disease in patients with psoriasis.

Methods

The following electronic databases were searched for articles from January 1, 2000 to March 1, 2022: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP database), Wan-Fang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The language was not restricted while performing the search. The quality of articles was evaluated using Rev. Man 5.4 software (provided by the Cochrane Collaboration), comparing bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy to conventional measures treatments. The studies obtained randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bloodletting cupping combined with conventional standard treatment for treating psoriasis. Two trained researchers (Xiaoyu Ma and Jiaming He) independently reviewed the literature, extracted data based on exclusion and inclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of the included studies. We estimated the aggregate data using a random effects model.

Findings

We identified 164 studies. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The primary outcome indicator was the total number of effective individuals. Secondary outcomes included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), adverse effects, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Compared with conventional treatments, bloodletting cupping combined with conventional medicine yielded an improved total effective number of persons (RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.07 to 1.22, p < 0.00001), PASI (MD = -1.11, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.82, p < 0.00001) and DLQI scores (MD = -0.99, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.59, p < 0.0001). We found no significant difference in adverse reactions (RR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.46 to 1.90, p = 0.85). The heterogeneity test showed the total effective numbers (p < 0.00001, I ² = 43%) and PASI (p < 0.00001, I ² = 44%) and DLQI scores (p < 0.00001, I ² = 0%).

Interpretation

Bloodletting cupping combined with conventional treatment can achieve the ideal treatment for psoriasis. However, the combined treatment in psoriasis needs to be further evaluated in high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes to enable future studies in clinical use.

Injections Site Reactions and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Questionnaire Based Real Life Study

Background

Biologic selection for psoriasis treatment should take into account numerous factors including injection site reactions (ISRs) such as swelling at the injection site, pain, burning, erythema, all possibly reducing patient adherence.

Methods

A 6-months observational real life study was performed involving psoriasis patients. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, moderate-to-severe psoriasis diagnosis since at least 1 year, patients being on biologic treatment for psoriasis ≥ 6 months. A 14-item questionnaire was administered to all patients enrolled to assess whether the patient ever experienced ISRs after the injection of the biologic drug.

Results

234 patients were included: 32.5% received an anti-TNF-alpha drug, 9.4% received anti-IL12/23, 32.5% received an anti-IL17, 25.6% received an anti-IL23. 51.2% of study population reported at least one symptom related to ISR. 35.9% of patients experienced pain, 31.6% swelling, 28.2% burning sensation and 17.9% erythema. 3.4% of the surveyed population experienced anxiety or fear of the biologic injection due to ISRs symptoms. The greater incidence of pain was registered in anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17 groups (47.4% and 42.1%, p<0.01). Ixekizumab proved to be the drug with the highest rate of patients experiencing pain (72.2%), burning (77.7%) and swelling (83.3%). No patients reported biologics discontinuation or delay for ISRs symptoms.

Conclusion

Our study highlighted that each different class of biologics for psoriasis was linked to ISRs. These events are more frequently reported with anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17.

Tildrakizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from 52 Weeks Real-Life Retrospective Study

Background

Tildrakizumab, an anti-IL-23, showed promising efficacy and safety profiles in two randomized clinical-trials (reSURFACE-1 and reSURFACE-2), comparing tildrakizumab superiority to placebo and etanercept. Due to its recent availability in clinical-practice, real-life data are still limited.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in a real-world-practice in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods

A 52-week observational retrospective study enrolled patients suffering from moderate-to-severe plaque-psoriasis, starting tildrakizumab treatment.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Mean PASI showed a significant reduction at each follow-up (p<0.001), reducing from 13.5±5.9 at baseline, 2.8±3.8 at week-28, resulting stable up to week-52. High rates of patients reached both PASI90 and PASI100 responses at both week 16 (PASI90: 52.4%, PASI100: 33.3%) and week 28 (PASI90: 76.1%, PASI100: 61.9%), maintaining these up to week 52 (PASI90: 73.8%, PASI100: 59.5%). The impact of treatment on patient's quality of life has been evaluated with DLQI, which showed a significant reduction during follow-ups.

Conclusion

Our data confirm tildrakizumab as an effective and generally safe treatment for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with high rates of both PASI90 and PASI100 responses, and very few reported adverse events, up to 52 weeks of follow-up.

The Role of Teledermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review

Teledermatology represented one of the most important and useful tools during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Indeed, due to the severe restriction, and to reduce the spread of the infection, different measures were applied among different countries and hospitals to ensure a continuity of care for patients. In this scenario, teledermatology played a central role, especially in the management of patients suffering from chronic inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze main strengths and limitations of this tool, as well as to provide future perspectives in clinical applications.

Drug safety evaluation of tildrakizumab for psoriasis: a review of the current knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that may have an important negative impact on a patient's quality of life. Biological agents deeply changed the management of its moderate-to-severe forms. Interleukin-23 inhibitors represent the latest biologics class approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In particular, tildrakizumab, the latest available anti-interleukin-23 on the Italian market, is a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to evaluate the safety profile of tildrakizumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients. A literature review included articles until July 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Our analysis showed tildrakizumab as a generally safe option for the treatment of psoriasis, with most of the reported adverse events being classified as mild or moderate, and rarely requiring treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, in line with other interleukin-23 inhibitor, no concerns have been raised for tildrakizumab in regard to inflammatory bowel diseases, which represent a significant comorbidity to investigate before starting other biologics (IL-17 inhibitors). However, more real-life long-term data are needed to confirm trial results to further confirm tildrakizumab as a generally safe treatment option for psoriasis.

Economic Burden of Comorbidities in Patients with Psoriasis in the USA

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the comorbidity burden, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs associated with patients with moderate to severe psoriasis (PsO) compared with a matched cohort of the general population without PsO in the USA.

METHODS

Comorbidity-related HCRU (incidence rate ratios [IRRs]) and direct medical cost burden (per patient per month [PPPM] 2020 USD) in patients with moderate to severe PsO in the USA, previously apremilast- and biologic-naive, but currently treated, versus the general population were assessed through a retrospective cohort study using IBM (now Merative) MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Claims data (1 January 2006 to 31 December 2019). Comorbidities included cardiovascular, mental health, pulmonary, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular, liver, obesity, and other autoimmune disorders.

RESULTS

There are increased all-cause HCRU and costs in patients with PsO compared with the general population. These differences (PsO-general population) in HCRU and costs (IRR visits; PPPM) are associated with specific comorbidities, including mental health (1.08; $372), chronic pulmonary disease (1.07; $135), diabetes (1.10; $159), hyperlipidemia (1.13; $203), hypertension (1.13; $305), liver disease (1.21; $360), and obesity (1.12; $145, all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsO experience a higher economic burden of comorbidities than the general population despite using currently available systemic treatments for PsO.

Drug safety evaluation of ixekizumab for psoriasis: a review of the current knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Since Anti-IL-17s availability, concerns about their safety have been raised due to the inhibition of physiological activities that IL-17A plays in the immune response against infections. Ixekizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL-17A approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate the safety profile of ixekizumab in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. A compressive literature review included article since March 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

in our analysis, most of the reported AEs were mild or moderate and rarely required treatment discontinuation. Among the class specific AEs to consider during ixekizumab treatment, there are the risk of Candida spp infections and the risk of IBD, which both were reported more frequently than if compared with placebo or other biologics (etanercept, ustekinumab, guselkumab). However, the reported candidiasis resulted mild-to moderate, and easily managed. The risk of IBD (both exacerbation and de novo diagnosis) represents a class effect of IL-17 inhibitors, which should be well evaluated before considering starting ixekizumab treatment. the most common AEs were represented by nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, and injection-site reactions. The analysed studies confirmed the favourable safety profile of ixekizumab even in more recently published studies.

Towards Personalized Medicine in Psoriasis: Current Progress

Although innovative targeted therapies have positively revolutionized psoriasis treatment shifting treatment goals to complete or almost complete skin clearance, primary or secondary lack of efficacy is still possible. Hence, identifying robust biomarkers that reflect the various clinical psoriasis phenotypes would allow stratify patients in subgroups or endotypes, and tailor treatments according to the characteristics of each individual (precision medicine). To sum up the current progress in personalized medicine for psoriasis, we performed a review on the available evidence on biomarkers predictive of response to psoriasis treatments, with focus on phototherapy and systemic agents. Relevant literature published in English was searched for using the following databases from the last five years up to March 20, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, EBSCO, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library. Currently, more evidence exists towards biologicals, as justified by the huge health care costs as compared to phototherapy or conventional systemic drugs. Among them, most of the studies focused on anti-TNF and IL12/23, with still few on IL17 (mainly secukinumab). The most discussed biomarker gene is the HLA-C*02:06 status that has been shown to be associated with psoriasis, and also differential response to biologicals. Although its positivity is associated with great response to MTX, debatable results were retrieved concerning both anti-TNF and IL12/23 while it seems not to affect secukinumab response. Personalized treatment in psoriasis would provide excellent outcome minimizing the risk of side effects. To date, although several candidates were proposed and assessed, the scarcity and heterogeneity of the results do not allow the identification of the gold-standard biomarker per each treatment. Anyway, the creation of a more comprehensive panel would be more reliable for the treatment decision process.

Psoriasis and medical ramifications: A comprehensive analysis based on observational meta-analyses

Purpose

Based on a large number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses exploring the relationship between psoriasis and various health outcomes, we conducted an comprehensive analysis to assess the strength and evidence for the association between psoriasis and medical end-point ramifications in patients.

Methods

We searched related meta-analyses, investigating the links between psoriasis and medical ramifications from three databases. All summary effect sizes, 95% CIs, heterogeneity, and small-study effects in the included meta-analyses were recalculated. We assessed the methodological quality of included articles with the AMSTAR 2 tool and graded the epidemiological evidence. Subgroup analysis based on the severity of psoriasis and study design were also performed.

Results

A total of 38 articles comprising 85 unique meta-analyses were included in this study. Although 69 outcomes were statistically significant, only 8 outcomes (nonvascular dementia, ulcerative colitis, pediatric dyslipidemia, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, fracture, multiple sclerosis, and schizophrenia) showed a high quality of epidemiological evidence.

Conclusion

We found that psoriasis increased the risk of 69 health outcomes, and 8 outcomes were graded as high-quality evidence. No evidence was found that psoriasis was beneficial for any medical end point. However, to verify our results, more large-sample, multi-center prospective cohort studies are needed.

Burning and Scaling Probably Associated with Dupilumab Therapy: A Case Report

Case Report

We present the case of a 51-year-old male who experienced temporary desquamation and recurrent burning sensation in primary skin lesions after the injection of dupilumab. The scaling lasted for 1 week and subsided, while the burning became aggravated with each injection of dupilumab, which gradually subsides after 8 weeks, and there was no recurrence since then.

Conclusion

Dupilumab is an emerging and efficacious biologics medication for AD. The burning sensation and scaling we report may be the adverse events of dupilumab. Rare adverse reactions to biologics deserve the attention of physicians.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Psoriasis: A Review of the Real-World Evidence

Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, represent the latest class of biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Since their approval numerous real-life studies were published on anti-IL-23 use in routine clinical practice. Indeed, real-life data are important to improve the dermatological decision-making process, including patients who are typically excluded from clinical trials, such as subjects suffering from several comorbidities, subjects on polypharmacy, as well as multifailure patients. Herein, we performed a comprehensive literature review about real-life data available on guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Real-life data of anti-IL-23 seem to confirm the promising results of IL-23 shown by clinical trials, highlighting the efficacy and safety profiles of this new class of biologics also in clinical practice.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 3-Year Real-Life Retrospective Study

Introduction

Guselkumab safety and efficacy profiles in psoriasis have been showed by VOYAGE (1 and 2) trials. Although trial results have been already previously confirmed by real-life studies, long-term real-life data, and drug survival data about guselkumab are still poor.

Patients and Methods

We performed a 3-year retrospective study, with the aim of assessing guselkumab efficacy and safety profile in the management of plaque psoriasis in a real-life setting.

Results

Thirty-one patients completed the study. Both Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) statistically improved since week 16, and up to week 144 [PASI reduction from 16.4 ± 6.2 to 0.6 ± 0.9 (p < 0.0001) at week 144 while BSA from 33.2 ± 14.6 to 1.9 ± 1.4 (p < 0.0001)]. At week 12 PASI90 and PASI100 were achieved by 19 (61.3%) and 11 (35.4%) patients, respectively, as well as 24 (77.4%) and 18 (58.1%) subjects reached PASI 90 and PASI 100 at week 144. As regards the safety, no cases of injection site reaction, candida, serious AEs, malignancy, or major cardiovascular events were reported. Of note, mild AEs were collected with pharyngitis as the main one (7, 22.6%), followed by headache (5, 16.1%) and flu-like illness (5, 16.1%), all without requiring treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

Our experience confirmed the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in daily clinical practice up to 3 years, suggesting this drug as an effective treatment option in psoriasis long-term management.

Ixekizumab and brodalumab indirect comparison in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from an Italian single-centre retrospective study in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Eleven biologic drugs are currently approved for psoriasis management. Real-life studies are needed to guide clinicians in choosing a tailored-tail therapy. The aim of our retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and brodalumab in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A single-centre real-life retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients under biologic treatment with ixekizumab or brodalumab. For each patient, clinical and demographic data were collected and the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab and ixekizumab treatment were evaluated at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were used for psoriasis severity.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included in the study: 98(70.5%) and 41(29.5%) patients received ixekizumab and brodalumab, respectively. Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow up for both ixekizumab and brodalumab groups. Even if ixekizumab reached higher rates of PASI90 and PASI100 than brodalumab (PASI90: 43.8%vs39.0% PASI100: 20.4%vs17.1% at week4 and PASI90: 83.6%vs75.6% PASI100: 71.5%vs60.9% at week24), these results were not statistically significant. Adverse events, mainly mild, were registered in 25.5% of ixekizumab and 26.8% of brodalumab group, respectively. Discontinuation rate was higher for brodalumab (17.1%vs9.1%), without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety for ixekizumab and brodalumab.

Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of the Current Knowledge

Bimekizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that neutralizes both IL-17A and IL-17F, was recently approved the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. Bimekizumab represents the latest anti IL-17 treatment available for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy profiles were evaluated in four Phase III clinical trials, which evaluated bimekizumab versus placebo and ustekinumab (BE VIVID), versus placebo (BE READY), versus adalimumab (BE SURE), and versus secukinumab (BE RADIANT). Overall, bimekizumab displayed promising results in terms of both efficacy and safety, allowing reach PASI90 and PASI100 in short time (as early as week 4) and maintain it in the long term (52 weeks), with acceptable safety profile. Also, bimekizumab showed a rapid onset of response and a higher efficacy when compared to adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab, with comparable safety profile. Herein, we carried out a comprehensive literature review of the available literature data about bimekizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Risankizumab treatment in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study

Recent knowledge on the key role of interleukin (IL) 23/17 axis in psoriasis pathogenesis, led to development of new biologic drugs. Risankizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL23. Its efficacy and safety were showed by both clinical trials and real‐life experiences. However, real‐life data on effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17 are scant. To assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17. A 52‐week real‐life retrospective study was performed to assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients who previously failed anti‐IL17. A total of 39 patients (26 male, 66.7%; mean age 50.5 ± 13.7 years) were enrolled. A statistically significant reduction of psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) was assessed at each follow‐up (PASI at baseline vs. week 52: 13.7 ± 5.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001; BSA 21.9 ± 14.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.0001). Nail psoriasis severity index improved as well, being statistically significative only at week 16 and thereafter [9.3 ± 4.7 at baseline, 4.1 ± 2.4 (p < 0.01) at week 16, 1.4 ± 0.8 (p < 0.0001) at week 52]. Treatment was discontinued for primary and secondary inefficacy in 1(2.6%) and 3(7.7%) patients, respectively. No cases of serious adverse events were assessed. Our real‐life study confirmed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, suggesting it as a valuable therapeutic weapon among the armamentarium of biologics, also in psoriasis patients who previously failed anti‐IL17 treatments.

Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a multi-center, retrospective, 1 year real-life study

BACKGROUND

Several new biologic agents targeting IL23/Th17 axis, such as risankizumab, have been developed for the treatment of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis over a 52-week period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study was conducted in patients who initiated risankizumab between July 2019-December 2020. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index - PASI was measured at baseline and after 4, 16, 28 and 52 weeks. Clinical responses were evaluated by PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 at the same timepoints. Potential safety issues and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed for variables predicting clinical response.

RESULTS

112 patients with psoriasis were included. PASI90 response was achieved by 17.86% of patients at week 4, 72.22% at week 16, 91.0% at week 28 and 95.24% at week 52 (as observed analysis). No associations between the considered variables and the efficacy endpoints were retrieved, influence of variables such as Body Mass Index (BMI), baseline PASI or previous biologics were not shown. No serious safety issues or discontinuations related to adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab showed high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, regardless of patient- and disease-related factors.

Cumulative Clinical Benefits of Biologics in the Treatment of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis over 1 Year: a Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Both early clinical improvement and long-term maintenance of clinical efficacy of treatments matter to patients with psoriasis. We compared cumulative clinical benefits of treatment with biologics over 1 year based on the area under the curve (AUC) for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 and PASI 90 responses in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

Published phase 3 randomized, placebo- or active-controlled clinical trial data for biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis were obtained from a systematic literature review up to 30 September 2020. Eighteen clinical trials that included data from baseline to 48 or 52 weeks where AUC could be calculated were included. Data were compared using a fixed-effect model with a separate random-effect baseline model to account for effects of the placebo arm. Cumulative clinical benefit was estimated using the AUC for PASI 100 and PASI 90 responses (complete and almost-complete skin clearance, respectively). Normalized AUC was compared using Bayesian NMA. Cumulative days of response were calculated using normalized AUC and study duration.

Results

Interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrated greater cumulative clinical benefits for both PASI 100 and PASI 90 versus IL-12/23 and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Over 52 weeks, cumulative days with PASI 100 were greatest with ixekizumab [158.7 (95% credible interval, 147.4, 170.0) days] followed by risankizumab [154.0 (144.9, 163.4) days]; PASI 90 days were greatest with risankizumab [249.3 (239.5, 259.2) days] followed by ixekizumab [238.8 (227.1, 250.8) days]. Both ixekizumab and risankizumab showed greater cumulative days with PASI 100 or PASI 90 responses versus secukinumab [117.9 (110.7, 125.2) and 215.5 (208.2, 223.1) days, respectively] and greater cumulative days with PASI 100 versus guselkumab [130.7 (120.5, 140.9) days].

Conclusion

For complete and almost-complete skin clearance, ixekizumab and risankizumab provided the greatest cumulative clinical benefits over 1 year.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00690-5.

Risankizumab Shows High Efficacy and Maintainance in Improvement of Response Until Week 52

Risankizumab has been recently approved for moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis; however, real‐life studies are scarce. Analysis of possible predictor factors of treatment response are limited to body mass index (BMI) and previous biologic experience. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Risankizumab and to investigate on possible predictor factors response. We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients from two centers in Italy who undergone Risankizumab for psoriasis. The proportion of patients achieving a 100%, 90%, 75% of improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and PASI <3 were collected at weeks 16, 28, 40, and 52. Study population was analyzed in subgroups to investigate possible predictors of response to Risankizumab since week 40. At the time of analysis 165, 103, 30, and 11 patients had completed 16, 28, 40, and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. The mean PASI score decreased from 12.5 ± 5.1 at baseline to 1.9 ± 2.4 at week 16. Similar reductions were observed when considering PASI <3, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. Previous biologics failure, different smoking habits, obesity, and joint involvement resulted in a lower response to risankizumab. In particular, significant differences in mean PASI at any time‐points was observed between psoriatic arthritis (PSA) and non‐PSA patients: 2.7 versus 1.7 (p = 0.036), 1.9 versus 0.4 (p = 0.006), and 4.1 versus 0.5 (p = 0.016) at 16, 28, and 40 weeks, respectively. No difference in response to risankizumab occurred in the case of involvement of difficult‐to‐treat areas. In this population, Risankizumab was effective and safe. Smoking habits, joint involvement, obese status, and previous biologic experience may negatively affect treatment response, while difficult body sites involvement have minor impact.

Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) Questionnaire and Current Perception Threshold: Use as Diagnostic Tools for Sensitive Skin Syndrome

The assessment of sensitive skin syndrome, characterized by subjective unpleasant sensations, remains a challenge, since there is no international consensus on the best diagnostic tools. This study evaluated the combination of the Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) questionnaire and the current perception threshold as diagnostic tools for sensitive skin syndrome, and the relationship between BoSS and the subjects' smoking status, phototype and skin type. A total of 100 women completed the BoSS questionnaire, and current perception threshold was measured on the face. The BoSS score was significantly higher in the self-reported sensitive skin group compared with the non-sensitive skin group (25.61 vs 14.05; p < 0.001), and in non-smokers vs smokers (23.00 vs 18.37; p < 0.05). In addition, the current perception threshold values were similar between the sensitive and non-sensitive groups. These results suggest that BoSS is a better diagnostic tool for sensitive skin syndrome than the current perception threshold, and that smokers less frequently have sensitive skin than do non-smokers.

Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study

IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates.

Anti-interleukin-23 for psoriasis in elderly patients: guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab in real-world practice

Background

Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) represent an increasing proportion of patients with psoriasis and 15% of these have moderate to severe disease. Biologics are being used frequently in this group of patients even though safety and efficacy data are limited. In addition, owing to anti‐interleukin (IL)‐23 therapies being a relatively recent option, no data have been reported about their use in elderly patients with psoriasis.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab in real‐world practice in elderly patients.

Methods

This was a single‐centre retrospective study that enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, treated with guselkumab, risankizumab or tildrakizumab. The length of the study for each group depended on the drug (44 weeks for risankisumab, 40 weeks for guselkumab and 28 weeks for tildrakizumab, owing to its more recent availability in Italy).

Results

In total, 34 patients were enrolled (n = 20 on guselkumab; n = 8 on risankizumab; n = 6 on tildrakizumab). At Week 4, 29.4% reached 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) and 8.8% reached 100% improvement in PASI (PASI100); at Week 28, PASI90 and PASI100 was reached by 58.8% and 29.4%, respectively. At the final follow‐up (Week 40 or 44, depending on drug), data were available only for the risankizumab (Week 40) and guselkumab (Week 44) and groups, and showed that 71.4% of patients had reached PASI90 and 53.5% had reached PASI100. Four patients (11.7%) discontinued treatment. No significant differences were found between the three groups. The limitations of the study included its retrospective nature of the study, small sample size, and different numbers of patients and follow‐up duration for the different groups (highest for guselkumab, lowest for tildrakizumab).

Conclusion

The three anti‐IL‐23 therapies assessed are promising, safe and effective options in elderly patients, and there was no significant difference between them. However, more data are needed to confirm our results and to understand their role in the management of this group of patients.

Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Real-Life Multicenter Experience from the Czech Republic

Introduction

Risankizumab has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, real-life data are limited. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab and its impact on the quality of life of patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 154 patients from 18 centers in the Czech Republic who had undergone biologic therapy with risankizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Baseline characteristics included data on comorbidities, demographics, previous therapies, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. The proportion of patients achieving a 90% improvement in their PASI score from baseline (PASI 90) and complete resolution (PASI 100) after 16, 28, and 52 weeks was analyzed.

Results

A total of 95 men and 59 women with mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.6 were enrolled in our analysis. The mean age of the patients was 48.5 years and the mean time from diagnosis until initiation of risankizumab therapy was 22.5 years. After 16 weeks, 63.8 and 44.7% patients achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses, respectively. Improvement continued with time, and the proportion of patients with PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses increased to 82.4 and 67.6%, respectively, at week 52. A significant reduction was observed over time in the DLQI. Patients achieving PASI 100 response at week 16 had a higher reduction in the DLQI score than those with PASI 90 response (− 15.9 vs. − 11.8). PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses were independent of the BMI and previous biologic therapy. No new safety issues were identified.

Conclusions

In this patient population, risankizumab was effective and safe in a real-world setting, and a high number of patients achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses. A higher reduction in the DLQI was seen in patients with PASI 100 response, which supports the evidence that this value should be the new therapeutic goal.