1
|
Padamsee TJ, Bijou C, Swinehart-Hord P, Hils M, Muraveva A, Meadows RJ, Shane-Carson K, Yee LD, Wills CE, Paskett ED. Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:8. [PMID: 38212792 PMCID: PMC10785448 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To understand the dynamics that limit use of risk-management options by women at high risk of breast cancer, there is a critical need for research that focuses on patient perspectives. Prior research has left important gaps: exclusion of high-risk women not in risk-related clinical care, exclusion of non-white populations, and lack of attention to the decision-making processes that underlie risk-management choices. Our objective was to create a more inclusive dataset to facilitate research to address disparities related to decision making for breast cancer risk management. METHODS The Daughter Sister Mother Project survey collects comprehensive information about the experiences of women at high risk of breast cancer. We collected novel measures of feelings about and reactions to cancer screenings; knowledge, barriers, and facilitators of risk-management options; beliefs related to cancer risk and risk management; and involvement with loved ones who had cancer. Eligible individuals were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Black adult women who self-identified as having high risk of breast cancer and had no personal history of cancer. Between October 2018 and August 2019, 1053 respondents completed the online survey. Of these, 717 were confirmed through risk prediction modeling to have a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥ 20%. Sociodemographic characteristics of this sample were compared to those of nationally representative samples of the US population: the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and the Pew Research Center report: Jewish Americans in 2020. RESULTS The sample of 717 women at objectively high risk of breast cancer was largely (95%) recruited from non-clinical sources. Of these respondents, only 31% had seen a genetic counselor, 34% had had genetic testing specific to breast cancer risk, and 35% had seen at least one breast or cancer care specialist. The sample includes 35% Black respondents and 8% with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Although encompassing a substantial range of ages, incomes, and education levels, respondents are overall somewhat younger, higher-income, and more educated than the US population as a whole. CONCLUSIONS The DSM dataset offers comprehensive data from a community-based, diverse sample of women at high risk of breast cancer. The dataset includes substantial proportions of Black and Ashkenazi Jewish women and women who are not already in clinical care related to their breast cancer risk. This sample will facilitate future studies of risk-management behaviors among women who are and are not receiving high-risk care, and of variations in risk-management experiences across race and ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA.
| | - Christina Bijou
- Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paige Swinehart-Hord
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Megan Hils
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Anna Muraveva
- Government Resources Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Center for Epidemiology and Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Celia E Wills
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herold N, Hellmich M, Lichtenheldt F, Ataseven B, Hillebrand V, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Healthy and Unilateral Diseased BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081357. [PMID: 36011268 PMCID: PMC9407233 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most efficient form of breast cancer (BC) risk reduction in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (pV) carriers. However, this intervention in physical integrity is associated with significant morbidity. We assessed long-term perception of satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL) after bilateral RRM and reconstruction using the validated BREAST-Q. We searched the prospective database of the Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cologne for previvors and survivors who underwent bilateral RRM from 1994 to 2015 and evaluated the results of their BREAST-Q scores. The study enrolled 43 previvors and 90 survivors after a mean follow-up of 46.3 ± 45.3 months after RRM. Satisfaction and QoL were independent of the technique of RRM or type of reconstruction but depended on the time of RRM. Compared to survivors, previvors had significantly higher mean satisfaction scores in their psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (chest) in both modules. Among previvors and survivors, higher psychological well-being correlated with a higher satisfaction with information and higher satisfaction with outcome. As psychological well-being correlated with satisfaction with information and outcome, we developed decision aids to improve shared decision making and long-term satisfaction with the decision and the postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Frank Lichtenheldt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Hillebrand
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-98409
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Segerer R, Peschel C, Kämmerer U, Häussler S, Wöckel A, Segerer S. Factors Impacting on Decision-Making towards Prophylactic Surgeries in BRCA Mutation Carriers and Women with Familial Predisposition. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:253-259. [PMID: 32774219 DOI: 10.1159/000503370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives BRCA mutation carriers and women at high risk of breast/ovarian cancer are faced with the intricate question to opt for prophylactic surgeries and/or a periodic screening. The aim of this study was therefore to identify objective and emotional factors that have an impact on the decision-making process. Methods Ninety-five women with BRCA mutations or women at increased breast/ovarian cancer lifetime risk were counseled at our outpatient department and either opted for prophylactic surgery or periodic screening. To identify the psychological factors that could have influenced the decision-making, a standardized questionnaire was applied. Additionally, clinical data were collected and were reviewed by a personal talk. Results Seventy-one of the patients opted for an increased surveillance only, 21 for prophylactic surgeries. Positive predictors for prophylactic surgeries were sociodemographic characteristics such as parity and objective variables such as verified mutation status. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the need for safety in health issues has been the only significant psychological predictor of surgery beyond the objective factors. Fear of surgical procedures, menopausal symptoms after surgery, loss of attractiveness, or fear of interferences with sexual life did not significantly affect decision-making. Conclusion Decision-making towards prophylactic surgeries is influenced by objective but also emotional factors. Knowing that fear and anxiety also have an important impact on decision-making, distinct counselling about the procedures, the subsequent risk reduction as well as the psychological effects of prophylactic surgeries are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Segerer
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Clara Peschel
- Klinikum Stuttgart - Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rippinger N, Fischer C, Haun MW, Rhiem K, Grill S, Kiechle M, Cremer FW, Kast K, Nguyen HP, Ditsch N, Kratz CP, Vogel J, Speiser D, Hettmer S, Glimm H, Fröhling S, Jäger D, Seitz S, Hahne A, Maatouk I, Sutter C, Schmutzler RK, Dikow N, Schott S. Cancer surveillance and distress among adult pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers in Germany: A multicenter feasibility and acceptance survey. Cancer 2020; 126:4032-4041. [PMID: 32557628 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a high-risk cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants of TP53. Cancer surveillance has noted a significant survival advantage in individuals with LFS; however, little is known about the feasibility, acceptance, and psychosocial effects of such a program. METHODS Pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers completed a 7-part questionnaire evaluating sociodemographics, cancer history, surveillance participation, reasons for nonadherence, worries, and distress adapted from the Cancer Worry Scale. Counselees' common concerns and suggestions were assessed in MAXQDA Analytics Pro 12. RESULTS Forty-nine participants (46 females and 3 males), aged 40.0 ± 12.6 years, formed the study population; 43 (88%) had a personal cancer history (including multiple cancers in 10 [20%]). Forty-three individuals participated (88%) in surveillance during the study or formerly. Willingness to undergo surveillance was influenced by satisfaction with genetic testing and counseling (P = .019 [Fisher-Yates test]) but not by sociodemographics, cancer history, or distress level. Almost one-third of the participants reported logistical difficulties in implementing surveillance because of the high frequency of medical visits, scheduling difficulties, and the travel distance to their surveillance providers. Self-reported distress and perceived emotional burden for family members and partners were moderate (median for self-reported distress, 3.3; median for perceived emotional burden, 3.0). For both, the interquartile range was moderate to very high (2.7-3.7 and 3.0-3.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with LFS require efficient counseling as well as an accessible, well-organized, interdisciplinary, standardized surveillance program to increase adherence and psychological coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rippinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Fischer
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Haun
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Huu P Nguyen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Kratz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Vogel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dorothee Speiser
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simone Hettmer
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanno Glimm
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany.,Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Seitz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hahne
- BRCA Network-Support for People with Hereditary Cancers
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blending Insights from Implementation Science and the Social Sciences to Mitigate Inequities in Screening for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16203899. [PMID: 31618814 PMCID: PMC6843353 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Genomic screening to identify people at high risk for adult-onset hereditary conditions has potential to improve population health. However, if not equitably accessible, genomics-informed screening programs will exacerbate existing health inequities or give rise to new ones. To realize the disease prevention potential of these screening tools, we need strategies to broaden their reach. We propose a conceptual framework that merges insights from implementation science and sociological research on health inequities. Our framework does three things: first, it broadens the arenas of action beyond those typically addressed in implementation science frameworks; second, it argues for recruiting more diverse partners to share the work of implementation and dissemination; and third, it shows how implementation activities can be coordinated more effectively among those partners. We use screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOC) as a case to illustrate how this enhanced framework could guide implementation science and distribute the benefits of genomic medicine more equitably. Although our example is specific to genomics, this approach is more broadly applicable to the field of implementation science. Coordinated action among multiple stakeholders could translate a host of new technologies from the bench to the trench without creating new inequities or exacerbating existing ones.
Collapse
|
6
|
Speiser D, Rebitschek FG, Feufel MA, Brand H, Besch L, Kendel F. Accuracy in risk understanding among BRCA1/2-mutation carriers. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1925-1931. [PMID: 31079956 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE BRCA1/2-mutation carriers are at high risk of developing cancer. Since they must weigh clinical recommendations and decide on risk-reducing measures, the correct understanding of their 10-year cancer risks is essential. This study focused on the accuracy of women's subjective estimates of developing breast and ovarian cancer within ten years as prerequisite to reduce unnecessary prevention. METHODS 59 and 52 BRCA1/2-mutation carriers provided their individual risks of developing breast or ovarian cancer in the next 10 years, along with self-reported sociodemographic and psychosocial variables. Women's risk estimates were compared with their objective cancer risks that had been communicated before. RESULTS 22.6% of counselees under- and 53.2% of the counselees overestimated their 10-year risk of developing breast cancer. As for ovarian cancer, 5.6% under- whereas 51.9% overestimated their risk. Neither demographic factors such as education, parenthood and age, nor a prior diagnosis of breast cancer or prophylactic surgery accounted for these variations in risk accuracy. CONCLUSION Currently, risk communication during genetic counseling does not guarantee accurate risk estimation in BRCA-mutation carriers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Counselors must be prepared to prevent overestimation. Counselees' risk estimates need to be assessed and corrected to enable informed decision-making and reduce risks of unnecessary preventive efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Speiser
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix G Rebitschek
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Markus A Feufel
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Division of Ergonomics, Department of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Hannah Brand
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Besch
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Kendel
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keller K, Meisel C, Grübling N, Petzold A, Wimberger P, Kast K. Patient-Reported Satisfaction after Prophylactic Operations of the Breast. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:217-223. [PMID: 31558896 DOI: 10.1159/000496398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic mastectomies in carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are becoming increasingly more accepted. We investigated the outcome after prophylactic mastectomy, especially regarding satisfaction with the procedure, in a monocenter study. Methods BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers with elevated pedigree-based cancer risk were followed prospectively in a structured surveillance program between 2000 and 2017. A retrospective telephone survey was conducted among all patients with documented prophylactic mastectomy. Complications and satisfaction with the decision for prophylactic mastectomy were recorded. Results 39 patients who opted for a prophylactic mastectomy (38 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 1 non-carrier) were interviewed. Mostly nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction was performed (87%). Half of the patients (22/39; 56.4%) had a history of unilateral breast cancer. The median time since prophylactic mastectomy was 5.6 years. While 61.5% did not report any complications, flap loss was seen in 15% (3/20) and moderate limitations in everyday life were present in 20% (7/35). An improvement in quality of life was noticed by 82% after prophylactic mastectomy and no patient expressed regret with regard to the decision. Conclusions Prophylactic mastectomy is a procedure with risk for long-term complications in some cases. Our results confirm high satisfaction with the decision and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Keller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Meisel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nannette Grübling
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Petzold
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoffmann SM, Kappel D, Fech A, Enderle MD, Weiss M, Hahn M, Brucker SY, Kraemer B. Thermal effects of a novel electrosurgical device for focused preparation in breast surgery tested in a specified porcine tissue ex vivo breast model using infrared measurement. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:835-840. [PMID: 30607596 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5024-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This article investigates the qualities and thermal effects of a novel electrosurgical device (PT) which has been designed by ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Germany, for the preparation of critical locations such as in skin-sparing or nipple-sparing techniques and compares it to a standard device (SD) in a porcine ex vivo breast model using an heat map generated by infrared thermography. METHODS In total, 42 abdominal wall specimens of porcine tissue consisting of the skin and the underlying subcutaneous and muscle layer were alternately dissected using one of the devices and pre-settings. During the preparation with the two devices, the epicutaneous temperature was measured by an infrared camera (VarioCam, Jenoptik, Germany) and the maximum temperature as well as the slope of the temperature rise was analysed. RESULTS The use of PT shows significantly lower values for [Formula: see text] compared to SD. This effect was independent from the chosen mode. Using the same instrument in different modes, the use of AutoCut mode showed a significant reduction of [Formula: see text] at all indicated time points (SD: p < 0.0001 and PT: p < 0.0001). In summary, the combination of AutoCut + PT showed the lowest rise in temperature, whereas the combination of DryCut + SD led to the highest rise in temperature. The temperature difference between these two settings was 13.84 °C, which means a possible temperature reduction of 67% can be achieved by the right choice of device and its tailored mode. CONCLUSIONS The novel PT shows a significant reduction in epicutaneous temperature and a significant reduction of the slope of temperature rise most probably by a more focused application of energy compared to SD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Hoffmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - D Kappel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A Fech
- ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72070, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M D Enderle
- ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72070, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Weiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Hahn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - B Kraemer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|