1
|
Deuß E, Kürten CHL, Meyer M, Buhr CR, Künzel J, Ernst B, Mattheis S, Lang S, Hussain T. [Nodal metastasis and value of neck dissection in T1/2 oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas]. Laryngorhinootologie 2024. [PMID: 38830380 DOI: 10.1055/a-2291-9979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to heterogeneous data, the indication for elective neck dissection (END) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx and oropharynx (HPSCC and OPSCC) in stages T1/2N0 is somewhat unclear. Therefore, in this multicenter study, we performed detailed analysis of the metastatic behavior of HPSCC and OPSCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS The nodal metastatic patterns of 262 HPSCC and OPSCC patients who had undergone surgery was retrospectively investigated. In addition, recurrence-free and overall survival were recorded. Furthermore, a systematic literature review on the topic was completed. RESULTS In patients with HPSCC, a discrepancy between clinical and pathologic N status was recorded in 62.1% of patients vs. 52.4% for p16- OPSCC, and 43.6% for p16+ OPSCC. The occult metastasis rate in cT1/2cN0 primary tumors was 38.9% for HPSCC vs. 17.8% (p16- OPSCC) and 11.1% (p16+ OPSCC). Contralateral metastases occurred in 22.2% of cases for HPSCC at stages cT1/2cN0, compared to only 9.1% for p16- OPSCC, and 0% for p16+ OPSCC patients.Patients with p16+ OPSCC had better recurrence-free and overall survival than p16- OPSCC and HPSCC patients. A direct association between patient survival and the extent of neck surgical therapy could not be demonstrated in our patients. CONCLUSION Patients with HPSCC are at risk for bilateral neck metastases from stage cT1/2cN0, justifying bilateral END. Patients with T1/2 OPSCC present with occult metastases ipsilaterally in >20% of cases; however, the risk for contralateral occult metastasis is <10%. Hence, in strictly lateralized cT1/2CN0 tumors, omission of contralateral END may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Deuß
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Cornelius H L Kürten
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Moritz Meyer
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Raphael Buhr
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julian Künzel
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ernst
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Mattheis
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Lang
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Timon Hussain
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdel-Halim CN, O'Byrne TJ, Graves JP, Akpala CO, Moore EJ, Price DL, Tasche KT, Ma DJ, Neben-Wittich MA, Lester SC, Gamez M, Price KA, Bayne HEF, Rwigema JCM, Patel SH, McGee LA, Janus JR, Nagel TH, Hinni ML, Savvides PS, Van Abel KM, Routman DM. Patterns and distribution of regional nodal involvement and recurrence in a surgically treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma cohort at a tertiary center. Oral Oncol 2023; 146:106569. [PMID: 37734203 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate and describe the patterns of regional metastases and recurrences after surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OPSCC from 2006 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Only patients treated with surgery including a neck dissection were included. Patients with unknown human papillomavirus (HPV) status, prior head and neck cancer, distant metastases, or synchronous head and neck cancer were excluded. RESULTS A total of 928 patients were included. 89% were males, the average age was 58.6 years (range: 25.2-87.5), 874 (94%) were HPV(+), and 513 (55.3%) had a tonsil cancer. Among cN + patients, the most commonly involved levels at presentation were level II (85.2%), level III (33.3%), and level IV (9.4%). In cN0 patients, metastases were only observed in level II (16.2%) and level III (9.2%). Nodal recurrence occurred in 48 (5.2%) patients after a median time of 1.0 years (interquartile range: 0.6-2.0). Nodal recurrence incidence was similar in HPV(+) and HPV(-) patients (5.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.44). The most common levels for regional recurrence were ipsilateral level II (45.8%), contralateral level II (43.8%), and ipsilateral level V (25.0%). Multivariable analysis revealed that pN was a significant predictor for regional recurrence (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION There is no difference in the distribution of regional metastases and recurrences in HPV(+) and HPV(-) OPSCC patients. Our findings align with the established understanding that regional metastases predominantly manifest in the ipsilateral level II-IV at presentation. Moreover, the data support the clinical recommendation to restrict elective neck dissection in cN0 patients to ipsilateral levels IIa and III, excluding level IIb. Regional recurrence is significantly associated with pN status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadi N Abdel-Halim
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Thomas J O'Byrne
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jeffrey P Graves
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Christeebella O Akpala
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Eric J Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Daniel L Price
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kendall T Tasche
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mauricio Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Katharine A Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Thomas H Nagel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Michael L Hinni
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | | | - Kathryn M Van Abel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meccariello G, Catalano A, Cammaroto G, Iannella G, Vicini C, Hao SP, De Vito A. Treatment Options in Early Stage (Stage I and II) of Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:1050. [PMID: 36013517 PMCID: PMC9415053 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to show an overview on the treatments' options for stage I and II oropharyngeal carcinomasquamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). BACKGROUND The traditional primary treatment modality of OPSCC at early stages is intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) has offered as an alternative, less invasive surgical option. Patients with human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive OPSCC have distinct staging with better overall survival in comparison with HPV-negative OPSCC patients. METHODS a comprehensive review of the English language literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL electronic databases. CONCLUSIONS Many trials started examining the role of TORS in de-escalating treatment to optimize functional consequences while maintaining oncologic outcome. The head-neck surgeon has to know the current role of TORS in HPV-positive and negative OPSCC and the ongoing trials that will influence its future implementation. The feasibility of this treatment, the outcomes ensured, and the side effects are key factors to consider for each patient. The variables reported in this narrative review are pieces of a bigger puzzle called tailored, evidence-based driven medicine. Future evidence will help in the construction of robust and adaptive algorithms in order to ensure the adequate treatment for the OPSCC at early stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Meccariello
- Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Head-Neck Surgeries, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Health Local Agency Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Andrea Catalano
- Otolaryngology Unit, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammaroto
- Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Head-Neck Surgeries, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Health Local Agency Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Giannicola Iannella
- Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Head-Neck Surgeries, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Health Local Agency Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Claudio Vicini
- Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Head-Neck Surgeries, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Health Local Agency Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Sheng-Po Hao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen University, Taipei 111, Taiwan
| | - Andrea De Vito
- Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Head-Neck Surgeries, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Health Local Agency of Romagna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Level IV neck dissection in cN0 HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:535. [PMID: 35549914 PMCID: PMC9097444 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09609-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As opposed to observation of the neck, elective neck dissection has a survival benefit for cN0 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, there are limited date on level IV neck dissection in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative OPSCC because most earlier studies did not stratify by P16 or HPV status. Thus, whether to exclude level IV from selective dissection (SND) of cN0 HPV-negative OPSCC remains controversial. METHODS In this single-center retrospective cohort study, disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated as the primary endpoint for 124 cN0 HPV-negative OPSCC patients who received SND of levels I-III (Group A) and I-IV (Group B). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were considered secondary endpoints. RESULTS For the entire cohort, the 5-year DFS rates of Groups A and B were 55.0% and 60.1%, respectively. Five-year OS rates were 58.9% and 61.5%, and 5-year DSS rates were 74.0% and 64.8%, respectively. Group B did not show higher 5-year DFS, OS, or DSS than Group A. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective cohort study validated that in cN0 HPV-negative OPSCC, SND including level IV does not have substantial benefits regarding DFS, OS or DSS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng X, Peng L, Wen W, Sun W. Comparison of Survival of Patients With T 1 -2 cN 0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:1205-1212. [PMID: 34797566 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1-2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0 ) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. STUDY DESIGN An observational retrospective study. METHODS This retrospective study included 845 patients diagnosed with T1-2 cN0 OPC during 2010-2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic roles of END. Furthermore, propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the END and observation (OBS) groups, and subgroup analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Our study showed that END was an independent prognostic factor associated with a better 3-year OS compared with OBS in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.235-0.916; P = .027). However, we found no prognostic value of END in HPV-negative cohort (adjusted HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.535-1.310; P = .435). In the subgroup analyses, we found that younger patients (≤65 years old) and patients with nontonsillar tumors in HPV-positive cohort were more likely to benefit from END, while patients with tonsillar tumors in HPV-negative cohort may benefit from END. CONCLUSIONS We found that patients with HPV-positive T1-2 cN0 OPC could benefit from END in terms of OS, especially younger patients and those with nontonsillar tumors. Patients with HPV-negative T1-2 cN0 OPC could not benefit from END in terms of OS, while those with tonsillar tumors may benefit from END. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelan Zeng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang Peng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiping Wen
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Otolaryngology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Crook D, D'Cruz A, Rodriguez CP, Sher DJ, Silbermins D, Sturgis EM, Tsue TT, Weiss J, Yom SS, Holsinger FC. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1753-1774. [PMID: 30811281 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Doug Crook
- 3 Patient representative, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jared Weiss
- 10 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sue S Yom
- 11 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Green B, Bisase B, Godden D, Mitchell DA, Brennan PA. Current surgical management of metastases in the neck from mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54:135-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
8
|
Dunkel J, Vaittinen S, Koivunen P, Laranne J, Mäkinen MJ, Tommola S, Irjala H. Tumoral Expression of CD44 and HIF1α Predict Stage I Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcome. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2016; 1:6-12. [PMID: 28894797 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS No biomarkers are used to estimate the prognosis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In our previously published work, we have reported the prognostic value of CD44 and hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α in patients with stage I disease. STUDY DESIGN In this study, we tested our previous observations in a larger cohort. We also studied the predictive value of common lymphatic endothelial and vascular endothelial receptor (CLEVER)-1 in this material. METHODS CD44, HIF1α, and CLEVER-1 were immunohistochemically analyzed in paraffin-embedded tissue material of stage I OSCC patients treated at three Finnish university hospitals. Microscopy results were correlated with OSCC outcome. RESULTS As in our pilot study, the CD44lowHIF1αhigh signature was associated with poorer disease-free survival. Clear correlations between CLEVER-1 expression and clinical outcome were not evident. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that immunohistochemistry of CD44 and HIF1α may be useful in identification of patients with poor prognoses. These parameters could be used to select the optimal treatment modalities for stage I OSCC patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Dunkel
- Medicity Research Laboratory and Turku Doctoral Programme of Molecular Medicine University of Turku
| | - Samuli Vaittinen
- the Department of Pathology University of Turku and Turku University Hospital Turku
| | - Petri Koivunen
- the Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology and Ophthalmology, University of Oulu and Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital
| | - Jussi Laranne
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Tampere University Hospital
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- the Department of Pathologyand Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu
| | - Satu Tommola
- the Department of Pathology University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
| | - Heikki Irjala
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Turku University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coskun HH, Medina JE, Robbins KT, Silver CE, Strojan P, Teymoortash A, Pellitteri PK, Rodrigo JP, Stoeckli SJ, Shaha AR, Suçrez C, Hartl DM, de Bree R, Takes RP, Hamoir M, Pitman KT, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Current philosophy in the surgical management of neck metastases for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2015; 37:915-26. [PMID: 24623715 PMCID: PMC4991629 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2013] [Revised: 01/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Neck dissection is an important treatment for metastases from upper aerodigestive carcinoma; an event that markedly reduces survival. Since its inception, the philosophy of the procedure has undergone significant change from one of radicalism to the current conservative approach. Furthermore, nonsurgical modalities have been introduced, and, in many situations, have supplanted neck surgery. The refinements of imaging the neck based on the concept of neck level involvement has encouraged new philosophies to evolve that seem to benefit patient outcomes particularly as this relates to diminished morbidity. The purpose of this review was to highlight the new paradigms for surgical removal of neck metastases using an evidence-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Hakan Coskun
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Jesus E. Medina
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - K. Thomas Robbins
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Carl E. Silver
- Departments of Surgery and Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Afshin Teymoortash
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Phillip K. Pellitteri
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Guthrie Health System, Sayre, Pennsylvania
| | - Juan P. Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Oncologıa del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Sandro J. Stoeckli
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ashok R. Shaha
- Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carlos Suçrez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Oncologıa del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Dana M. Hartl
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France
- Laboratoire de Phonétique et de Phonologie, Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert P. Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Hamoir
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Oncology Program, St Luc University Hospital and Cancer Center, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karen T. Pitman
- Department of Surgery, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Melchers LJ, Bruine de Bruin L, Schnell U, Slagter-Menkema L, Mastik MF, de Bock GH, van Dijk BAC, Giepmans BNG, van der Laan BFAM, van der Wal JE, Roodenburg JLN, Schuuring E. Lack of claudin-7 is a strong predictor of regional recurrence in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2013; 49:998-1005. [PMID: 23953778 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 07/18/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adequate treatment of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is dependent on correctly predicting the presence of lymph node metastases. Current methods to diagnose nodal metastases partly result in overtreatment with associated morbidity and undertreatment with decreased disease-free survival. E-cadherin has been studied extensively as potential marker for lymph node metastases. EpCAM and claudin-7 have a functional relationship with E-cadherin, forming a complex that promotes tumourigenicity in vitro. We hypothesize that the co-expression patterns of these related molecules is a better prognostic marker for nodal status and regional recurrences. MATERIALS AND METHODS We constructed separate tissue microarrays of tumour centre and tumour invasive front of 227 OSCC with complete clinicopathological and follow-up data, including HPV status, and performed immunohistochemistry for these molecules. RESULTS Lack of E-cadherin and presence of cytoplasmic EpCAM expression in the tumour front were predictive for nodal metastasis, but no co-expression pattern was found clinically relevant. Lack of claudin-7 in the tumour centre was highly and independently predictive for shorter regional disease-free survival (HR=0.19; 95%CI: 0.06-0.62) and disease-specific survival (HR=0.43; 95%CI: 0.21-0.87). High-risk HPV was not associated with any marker. CONCLUSIONS The expression of E-cadherin and EpCAM, depending on the specific tumour sublocalization, is predictive for nodal status. However, co-expression did not improve the prediction of nodal status, indicating that the proposed in vitro complex is not functional in clinical samples. Additionally, lack of claudin-7 expression in the tumour centre may be used to identify patients with increased risk for regional recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Melchers
- Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700RB Groningen, The Netherlands; Dept. of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|