Transoral robotic surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adjuvant Radiation Sparing after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and TORS in Selected HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has shown promising results in treating human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), and there has been increasing interest in incorporating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) prior to TORS. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of sparing adjuvant RT following NCT and TORS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with HPV-positive OPSCC who underwent NCT followed by TORS without adjuvant RT. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Pattern of recurrence (local, regional, and distant), salvage treatment outcomes, and predictors of tumor recurrence were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included in the analysis. No patients died during the study period. DFS rates (95% Confidence Interval, CI) at 1, 2, and 3 years were 92.8% (87.4-98.5), 87.0% (79.7-94.9), and 84.4% (76.0-93.8), respectively. Local, regional, and distant recurrence rates were 7.0%, 9.5%, and 3.6%, respectively. Salvage treatment achieved a 100% salvage rate. Predictors of tumor recurrence included the number of positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.19-5.92) and clinical stage III at diagnosis (hazard ratio: 7.65; 95% CI: 1.97-29.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendation of adjuvant treatment based on pathologic adverse features appears to be associated with favorable outcomes in selected HPV-positive OPSCC cases treated with NCT and TORS. Future studies should focus on refining criteria for recommending adjuvant RT to further reduce recurrence rates and minimize treatment-related toxicity, contributing to personalized treatment strategies for HPV-related OPSCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Safety and Postoperative Outcomes of Transoral Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Adults

Importance

Transoral surgery (TOS) has become the primary surgical treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, despite the increasing incidence of OPSCC in older patients, data regarding the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in this subgroup are lacking.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in patients with OPSCC aged 70 years or older compared with younger individuals.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included patients with microscopic diagnostic confirmation of invasive OPSCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021. Data were obtained from the US National Cancer Database. Data were analyzed in March 2024.

Exposure

Minimally invasive TOS not converted to an open approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were constructed to compare postoperative outcomes, adjusting for baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% CI, as appropriate.

Results

A total of 10 430 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [9.6] years; 8744 [83.8%] male) were included, with 1808 patients (17.3%) aged at least 70 years. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in terms of postoperative mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.33) or 90 days (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.65-1.87). Patients aged 70 years or older were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and chemotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77). In addition, the adjuvant treatment was more frequently not administered in the older population due to patient refusal or comorbidities, despite being clinically indicated (radiotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.77; chemotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.45). No meaningful differences were observed regarding the remaining study outcomes, apart from a slightly longer hospitalization time for older patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-0.74) days.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings from this study suggest that age was not independently associated with postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC. However, older patients less frequently received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with younger patients, and future studies should be conducted to examine the impact on long-term survival.

Primary Tumour Detection in Carcinoma of Unknown Primary with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Tongue Base Mucosectomy: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) represents a challenging diagnostic process when standard work-up fails to identify the primary tumour site. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic utility and complication profile of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) in the management of CUP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An electronic database search was performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to obtain an estimate of the overall proportion for the detection and complication rates.

RESULTS

Nine studies representing 235 patients with CUP who had TORS TBM were included in the final analysis. The overall pooled tumour detection rate was 66.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 56.1-75.8]. The incidence of tumour detection in human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive cases (81.5%, 95% CI 60.8-96.4) was significantly higher than HPV-negative cases (2.3%, 95% CI 0.00-45.7). Weighted overall complication rate was 11.4% (95% CI 7.2-16.2). The majority were grade I or II (80%) according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests TORS to be safe and effective in localising the primary tumour site in patients with CUP. While the current data supports the use of TORS in patients who are HPV positive, larger numbers of HPV-negative cases are required to determine the true diagnostic effect with TORS before any valid conclusions can be inferred in this particular subgroup. Further research should focus on high quality prospective trials with stringent methodological work-up to minimise heterogeneity and allow for more accurate statistical analysis.

Quality of life outcomes comparing primary Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) with primary radiotherapy for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) and radiotherapy are considered oncologically equivalent primary treatment options for early-stage HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are therefore imperative in supporting clinical decision-making and optimising patient-centred care. The aim of this article is to evaluate how these primary treatment modalities compare in terms of QoL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing primary TORS and primary radiotherapy for OPSCC using validated QoL tools. Swallowing and global QoL were the primary endpoints with secondary endpoints including all other QoL domains. An inverse variance random-effects model was employed to calculate the weighted estimate of the treatment effects across trials.

RESULTS

A total of six studies collectively reporting on 555 patients were included (n = 236 TORS and n = 319 radiotherapy). Meta-analysis showed no significant difference for swallowing (mean difference = -0.24, p = 0.89) and global QoL (mean difference = 4.55, p = 0.14). For the remaining QoL domains (neck/shoulder impairment, neurotoxicity, voice, xerostomia, speech, and distress), the scarcity of data did not permit meta-analysis. However, the existing data showed no significant difference for any except for xerostomia where TORS appears favourable in the sole study reporting on this.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS and radiotherapy appear to be comparable primary treatment options for early stage OPSCC when it comes to QoL. However, a substantial proportion of patients in the TORS group received adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy rendering it difficult to establish the 'true' QoL outcomes following surgery alone. There are also minimal studies reporting QoL outcomes beyond swallowing and global QoL. Further research is therefore needed, including more randomised trials adequately powered to detect differences in QoL outcomes.

Upfront surgery versus definitive radiotherapy: competing risk analyses for cancer-specific and noncancer mortality in oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment strategy for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is undetermined. We aim to compare the survival outcomes of OPC patients treated with upfront surgery versus definitive radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A total of 8057 cases were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific and noncancer mortalities, which were estimated using cumulative incidence function and compared by Gray's test. Univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the effects of treatment modality on mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed in propensity-score-matched cohorts. All the analyses were conducted separately in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive cohorts.

RESULTS

In the HPV-negative cohort, definitive RT was independently associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.64; P = 0.017) and noncancer mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.13-2.25; P = 0.008). In the HPV-positive cohort, definitive RT was independently associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.51; 95% CI 1.23-1.85; P < 0.001) and noncancer mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.53; 95% CI 1.11-2.12; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Upfront surgery is a superior treatment modality compared with definitive RT in terms of lowering cancer-specific and noncancer mortality in OPC patients, regardless of HPV status. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with low rates of adjuvant therapy: A consecutive single-institution study from 2013 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in recent decades, driven by infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and neck dissection (ND) has been employed as an alternative to radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. The current literature is lacking studies providing an exhaustive overview of recurrence characteristics and long-term outcomes in TORS-treated OPSCC-patients.

METHODS

All patients treated for OPSCC with primary TORS + ND in Eastern Denmark between 2013 and 2020 were included in the study. The aim was to explore overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence patterns, and ultimate failure rate (UFR). OS and RFS were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression analyses were employed to examine effect of different variables on risk of death and recurrence.

RESULTS

The study included 153 patients of which 88.9 % (n = 136) were treated with TORS alone while 11.1 % (n = 17) received adjuvant therapy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 97.4 %, 94.1 %, and 87.6 % while 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS were 96.6 %, 87.8 %, and 84.9 %. The UFR was 6.5 % in the cohort. Patients with HPV+/p16 + OPSCC had a significantly better 5-year OS of 92.3 % than patients with discordant or double-negative HPV/p16 status (OS = 73.3 %). No differences in outcomes between patients treated with or without adjuvant therapy were found in regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Excellent survival and disease control was obtained with TORS + ND in this cohort, despite lesser application of adjuvant therapy than other TORS-centers, implying that TORS without adjuvant therapy can be successfully applied in treatment of early-stage OPSCC.

The dual role of autophagy in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) displays distinct epidemiological, clinical, and molecular characteristics compared to the negative counterpart. Alterations in autophagy play an important role in cancer, and emerging evidence indicates an interplay of autophagy in HNSCC carcinogenesis and tumor promotion. However, the influence of HPV infection on autophagy in HNSCC has received less attention and has not been previously reviewed. Therefore, we here aimed to systematically review the role of autophagy explicitly in HPV+ HNSCC.

METHODS

Studies accessible in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science investigating HNSCC, highlighting the molecular biological differences between HPV- and HPV+ HNSCC and its influences on autophagy in HNSCC were analyzed according to the PRISMA statement. A total of 10 articles were identified, included, and summarized.

RESULTS

The HPV16 E7 oncoprotein was reported to be involved in the degradation of AMBRA1 and STING, and to enhance chemotherapy-induced cell death via lethal mitophagy in HNSCC cells. Autophagy-associated gene signatures correlated with HPV-subtype and overall survival. Additionally, immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses indicate that high LC3B expression correlates with poor overall survival in oropharyngeal HNSCC patients.

CONCLUSION

HPV may dampen general bulk autophagic flux via degradation of AMBRA1 but may promote selective autophagic degradation of STING and mitochondria. Interpretations of correlations between autophagy-associated gene expressions or IHC analyses of autophagy-related (ATG) proteins in paraffin embedded tissue with clinicopathological features without biological validation need to be taken with caution.

Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems

BACKGROUND

The recently developed da Vinci single-port (SP) system offers potential advantages in maneuverability within narrower surgical spaces. This study aims to compare intra- and post-operative outcomes, technical advantages, and limitations of transoral resections using the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi systems for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with OPSCC who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Data on pre-operative variables, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients (males: 175; mean age: 59.0 ± 9.3) were included (SP: n = 136; Xi: n = 73). A significantly lower docking time was measured for the SP group (5.7 ± 2.5 min vs. 10.0 ± 4.4 min; p <.001). Similarly, the console time was reduced for the SP group though not reaching statistical significance (76.3 ± 30.7 min vs. 88.1 ± 36.9 min; p =.06). A greater proportion of patients showed wide negative resection margins in the SP group (71 % vs. 56 %; p =.10), although not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the da Vinci SP system in oropharyngeal surgery, with potential advantages in terms of reduced docking and console times. The findings suggest that the SP system offers improved maneuverability and instrument placement compared to the da Vinci Xi system.

Development of machine learning models for the prediction of long-term feeding tube dependence after oral and oropharyngeal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To predict the necessity of enteral nutrition at 28 days after surgery in patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic procedures for oral and oropharyngeal cancers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 193 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively collected at two tertiary referral centers to train (n = 135) and validate (n = 58) six supervised machine learning (ML) models for binary prediction employing 29 clinical variables available pre-operatively.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the six ML models ranged between 0.74 and 0.88, while the measured area under the curve (AUC) between 0.75 and 0.87. The ML algorithms showed high specificity (range 0.87-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (range: 0.31-0.77) in detecting patients with ≥28 days feeding tube dependence. Negative predictive value was higher (range: 0.81-0.93) compared to positive predictive value (range: 0.40-0.71). Finally, the F1 score ranged between 0.35 and 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification performance of the ML algorithms showed optimistic accuracy in the prediction of enteral nutrition at 28 days after surgery. Prospective studies are mandatory to define the clinical benefit of a ML-based pre-operative prediction of a personalized nutrition protocol.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transoral robotic surgery for the posterior pharyngeal wall carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) is associated with poor oncological outcomes based on current literature data. We reported the preliminary outcomes of a potential new treatment protocol based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center case series was performed including a total of 20 patients diagnosed with a SCC of the PPW between October 2010 and September 2021. All patients successfully completed TORS with neck dissection after NCT. Adjuvant treatment was performed in the presence of adverse pathologic features. Loco-regional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were defined as the time from surgery to tumor recurrence or death, as appropriate. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Surgical data and post-operative functional outcomes were also reported.

RESULTS

Estimated 3-year LRC, OS, and DSS rates (95% Confidence interval) were 59.7% (39.7-89.6), 58.6% (38.7-88.8), and 69.4% (49.9-96.6). The median hospital stay was 21 days (IQR 17.0-23.5). Oral diet and decannulation were achieved after a median of 14 days (IQR 12.0-15.0). Feeding tube and tracheostomy dependence after 6 months was observed in 3 (15%) and 2 (10%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NCT followed by TORS for PPW SCC treatment appears to have good oncological and functional outcomes for both early and locally advanced cancers. Further randomized trials and site-specific guidelines are needed.

Single-Port Versus Multiport da Vinci System for Transoral Robotic Surgery of Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Da Vinci single port (SP) has been recently approved for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Its characteristics make it particularly feasible for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal surgery. We report our experience comparing intra- and postoperative outcomes, technical advantages, and shortcomings of transoral laryngeal and hypopharyngeal resections performed with the da Vinci SP and the da Vinci Si/Xi systems.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

SETTING

Single academic tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Subjects included adult patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent TORS between 2008 and 2022. The SP and multiport (MP) systems were compared in terms of intraoperative times, short-term postoperative outcomes, and TORS-related complications after a propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients were enrolled (56 SP vs 129 MP patients), and a cohort of 112 patients was analyzed after matching. The docking time was reduced in the SP group (8.84 ± 4.67 vs 6.45 ± 3.11 minutes; p = .003), as well as console time (53.91 ± 29.38 vs 42.70 ± 13.72 minutes; p = .035). Positive margins were more frequent in the MP group (52% vs 43%; p = .34). The mean decannulation time was 1.86 days longer in the SP group (p = .046). No significant differences emerged from the analysis of the duration of hospitalization, enteral feeding, and TORS-related complications.

CONCLUSION

SP safety profile is comparable to that of previous models, while it showed advantages in terms of reduced docking times. Console times were also shortened due to improved maneuverability and field visualization.

Trans oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A multi institutional experience

OBJECTIVES

Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has proved to be a safe and feasible treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The aim of this study is to analyse oncological outcomes of OPSCC patients treated with TORS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 139 patients with OPSCC, treated with TORS between 2008 and 2020. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment details and oncological outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The management strategies included TORS alone in 42.5%, TORS-RT in 25.2% and TORS-CRT in 30.9%. The ENE was noted in 28.8% of neck dissections. In 19 patients clinically classified as unknown primaries, the primary was found in 73.7%. Rates of local, regional relapses and distant metastasis were 8.6%, 7.2%, and 6.5%, respectively. The 5 year- Overall Survival and Disease Free Survival were 69.6% and 71.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TORS fits well in the modern management of OPSCC. Although definitive CRT remains a milestone, TORS is proving to be a valid and safe treatment option. The choice of the therapeutic strategy requires evaluation by a multidisciplinary team.

Compartmental Transoral Robotic Lateral Oropharyngectomy with the da Vinci Single-Port System: Surgical Technique

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has renovated the surgical management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), allowing a minimally invasive surgical approach with optimal oncological outcomes. The recent introduction of the da Vinci Single Port (SP) system resulted in a considerable improvement of TORS technique.

METHODS

In this video, we illustrate the transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy performed with the da Vinci SP system in a 50-year-old male patient suffering from a p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma cT4N1M0.

RESULTS

The transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy is illustrated step by step. The structures encountered during the resection are described, and the surgical margins are defined based on anatomical landmarks. The most critical regions encountered during resection are pointed out, and the tip and tricks of this surgery are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A step-by-step transoral lateral oropharyngectomy is described to increase its reproducibility. The da Vinci SP system owns various benefits for performing transoral lateral oropharyngectomy due to the increased maneuverability in the narrower oral cavity working spaces.

Prognostic role of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To define if positive and close surgical margins are associated to worse prognosis in patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was local-regional control (LRC), and the results were summarized with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients (median age: 62.0, IQR: 55.0-68.2) were included. Univariable analysis showed a significant reduced LRC for patients with positive margins (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.02-3.24). However, they were not associated with worse LRC after adjusting for adverse tumor variables (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.40-1.65). ROC analysis was performed on 123 patients with negative margins (AUC: 0.54) measuring an optimal threshold of 1.25 mm (sensitivity = 60.0%; specificity = 50.5%). Univariable analysis showed non-significant differences between close and wide negative margins (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.59-3.54).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive surgical margin is not an independent predictor of tumor control and survival. A threshold of 1.25 mm was identified as the most appropriate to define close margins, but no difference was measured after distinguishing negative margins in close and wide margins.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with transoral robotic surgery for stage III and IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with stage III-IV laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with subsequent transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study included a total of 100 patients (median age of 67.0) affected by stage III-IV supraglottic or hypopharyngeal cancer. All patients underwent NAC followed by TORS and risk-adjusted adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 24.0 months. Estimated 2-year (95% CI) OS, DSS, and RFS were 75% (66% - 85%), 84% (76% - 92%), and 65% (56% - 76%), respectively. Among the 11 patients who relapsed on the primary site, 3 underwent salvage total laryngectomy, 3 underwent salvage CRT, and the others receive palliation or supportive care. At 6 months from surgery, 17 patients were still tracheostomized or had a stoma retainer, while 15 were gastrostomy dependent. At the Cox multivariable analysis, the clinical stage at presentation, the number of NAC cycles, and the presence of LVI were found to be independently correlated with the RFS.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that NAC followed by TORS can obtain good tumor control, survival, and organ preservation rates in stage III-IV laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer.

Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Is swallowing quality better after TORS or RT?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To answer an important question regarding the long-term morbidity of two oncological equivalent treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), namely a comparison of swallowing function results between patients treated with trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) versus patients treated with radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies included patients with OPSCC treated with TORS or RT. Articles reporting complete data on MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and comparing the two treatments (TORS vs RT) were included in the meta-analysis. Swallowing assessed with MDADI was the primary outcome, the evaluation with instrumental methods was the secondary aim.

RESULTS

Included studies provided a total of 196 OPSCC primarily treated with TORS vs 283 OPSCC primarily treated with RT. The mean difference in MDADI score at the longest follow-up was not significantly different between TORS and RT group (mean difference [MD] -0.52; 95% CI -4.53-3.48; p = 0.80). After treatment, mean composite MDADI scores demonstrated a slight impairment in both groups without reaching a statistical difference compared to the baseline status. DIGEST score and Yale score showed a significantly worse function in both treatment groups at 12-month follow-up compared to baseline status.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis demonstrates that up-front TORS (+- adjuvant therapy) and up-front RT (+- CT) appear to be equivalent treatments in functional outcomes in T1-T2, N0-2 OPSCC, however, both treatments cause impaired swallowing ability. Clinicians should have a holistic approach and work with patients to develop an individualized nutrition plan and swallowing rehabilitation protocol from diagnosis to post-treatment surveillance.

Upfront Surgery Versus Definitive Radiotherapy: Competing Risk Analyses in Early Stage Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival outcomes of early-stage oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with upfront surgery versus definitive radiotherapy (RT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Publicly available database.

METHODS

A total of 1877 patients with T1-2N0-1M0 OPC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific and noncancer mortalities, which were estimated using cumulative incidence function and compared by Gray's test. Univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the effects of treatment modality on mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed in propensity-score-matched cohorts. All the analyses were conducted separately in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive cohorts.

RESULTS

In the HPV-negative cohort, definitive RT was independently associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-3.68; p = .001) and noncancer mortality (adjusted SHR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.50-5.02; p = .001). In the HPV-positive cohort, definitive RT and upfront surgery could achieve similar cancer-specific and noncancer survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Upfront surgery is associated with lower cancer-specific and noncancer mortality in HPV-negative early-stage OPC patients. However, in the setting of HPV-positive early-stage OPC with better prognosis, the 2 treatment modalities have similar efficacy in terms of cancer-specific and noncancer survival outcomes. In the future, carefully designed prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Expression patterns of uPAR, TF and EGFR and their potential as targets for molecular imaging in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The clinical introduction of molecular imaging for the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) relies on the identification of relevant cancer-specific biomarkers. The application of three membrane-bound receptors, namely urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), tissue factor (TF) and EGFR have been previously explored for targeted imaging and therapeutic strategies in a broad range of solid cancers. The present study aimed to investigate the expression patterns of uPAR, EGFR and TF by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to evaluate their potential for targeted imaging and prognostic value in OPSCC. In a retrospective cohort of 93 patients with primary OPSCC, who were balanced into the 45 human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and 48 HPV-negative groups, the IHC-determined expression profiles of uPAR, TF and EGFR in large biopsy or tumor resection specimens were analyzed. Using the follow-up data, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were measured. Specifically, associations between survival outcome, biomarker expression and clinicopathological factors were examined using Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test following Kaplan-Meier statistics. After comparing the expression pattern of biomarkers within the tumor compartment with that in the adjacent normal tissues, uPAR and TF exhibited a highly tumor-specific expression pattern, whereas EGFR showed a homogeneous expression within the tumor compartment as well as a consistent expression in the normal mucosal epithelium and salivary gland tissues. The positive expression rate of uPAR, TF and EGFR in the tumors was 98.9, 76.3 and 98.9%, respectively. No statistically significant association between biomarker expression and survival outcome could be detected. Higher uPAR expression levels had a trend towards reduced OS according to results from univariate analysis (P=0.07; hazard ratio=2.01; 95% CI=0.92-4.37). Taken together, these results suggest that uPAR, TF and EGFR may be suitable targets for molecular imaging and therapy in OPSCC. In particular, uPAR may be an attractive target owing to their high positive expression rates in tumors and a highly tumor-specific expression pattern.

Upfront transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: real-world data from a tertiary comprehensive cancer center

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Robotic vs. transoral laser surgery of malignant oropharyngeal tumors-what is best for the patient? : A contemporary review

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is a malignancy of increasing prevalence. The oncologic community is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of de-intensifying treatment without compromising oncologic outcomes. Paramount to these treatment algorithms is primary surgery through transoral approaches. This article reviews the literature and concepts pertaining to transoral surgery and describes the two most common techniques, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Perioperative Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

The National Cancer Database is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methods used or for the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigators.

Current Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of the Tumor HPV Status

Simple Summary

Contrary to other head and neck subsites, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has shown a considerable increase in incidence over the past 20 years. This growing incidence is largely due to the increasing place of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related tumors. HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC are two distinct entities with considerable differences in terms of treatment response and prognosis. However, there are no specific recommendations yet in the therapeutic management of OPSCC patients according to their tumor HPV-status. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss the therapeutic management of patients with OPSCC and the impact of HPV status on treatment selection.

Abstract

Since there is no published randomized study comparing surgical and non-surgical therapeutic strategies in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), the therapeutic management of these patients remains highly controversial. While human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC are now recognized as two distinct diseases with different epidemiological, biological, and clinical characteristics, the impact of HPV status on the management of OPSCC patients is still unclear. In this review, we analyze the current therapeutic options in patients with OPSCC, highlighting the most recent advances in surgical and non-surgical therapies, and we discuss the impact of HPV status on the therapeutic strategy.

Robotic and Endoscopic Approaches to Head and Neck Surgery

Technological developments have disrupted the practice of medicine throughout history. Endoscopic and robotic techniques in head and neck surgery have emerged over the past half-century and have been incrementally adapted to expanding indications within otolaryngology. Robotic and endoscopic surgery have an established role in treatment of oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancers, reducing surgical morbidity and improving survival relative to traditional open approaches. Surgical treatment of human papillomavirus-mediated oropharyngeal cancer via transoral robotic surgery offers equivalent oncologic and functional outcomes relative to radiotherapy. Newer iterations of single-port robotic systems continue to expand the scope of robotics in head and neck surgery.

Long-term survival outcomes after primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with concurrent neck dissection for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In 2013, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) was implemented as a protocolled treatment alternative to the traditional radiotherapy (RT) in Denmark for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). In 2017, we published our first prospective feasibility study, showing that TORS with concurrent neck dissection successfully achieved negative margins in 29 out of 30 patients (97%) with early-stage OPSCC.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

This follow-up study aims to evaluate the five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

Retrospective follow-up study including 30 patients treated with TORS for early-stage OPSCC (T1-T2, N0-N1, M0, UICC 7th edition) from September 2014 to January 2016 at a single head and neck cancer centre in Denmark. The five-year OS, DSS and RFS, including a detailed analysis of the recurrences, were addressed.

RESULTS

The five-year OS, DSS and RFS was 90%, 93% and 87%, respectively. Median follow-up was 54.5 months. Four patients developed a recurrence, with one regional, one distant metastatic (M) and two locoregional recurrences. The median time to recurrence was 24 months (range 3-42 months).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

This follow-up study demonstrates good five-year OS, DSS and RFS in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing TORS and neck dissection for early-stage OPSCC.

Preoperative predictors of difficult oropharyngeal exposure for transoral robotic surgery: The Pharyngoscore

BACKGROUND

Insufficient exposure may require termination of procedure in transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of study was to develop a "Pharyngoscore" to quantify the risk of difficult oropharyngeal exposure (DOE) before TORS.

METHODS

Three-hundred six patients undergoing any surgical procedure at one Academic Hospital were prospectively enrolled. Oropharynx was exposed with Feyh-Kastenbauer retractor. Exposure was evaluated by direct and endoscopic visualization of the four oropharyngeal subsites. Preoperative clinical/anthropometric parameters were studied in good oropharyngeal exposure and DOE groups. Logistic regression was performed to explore association between clinical/anthropometric parameters and DOE. Statistically significant parameters at multivariate analysis were incorporated into a nomogram.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (21.2%) subjects were characterized by DOE. Variables associated with DOE at univariate analysis were male (p = 0.031), modified Mallampati Class (MMC) ≥ III (p < 0.001), smaller interincisor gap (p < 0.001), and larger neck circumference (p = 0.006). MMC, interincisor gap, and neck circumference were significant at multivariate analysis and were presented with a nomogram for creating the Pharyngoscore.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pharyngoscore is a promising tool for calculating DOE probability before TORS.

Indications and Clinical Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction

We reviewed the indications, peroperative feasibility, and postoperative clinical outcomes of our first 50 consecutive patients who underwent free flap reconstruction after TORS for complex pharyngeal defects at our institution. We analyzed indications according to previous radiotherapy, the size of the resection, and the transoral exposure of critical structures. We reviewed surgical data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes comprising tracheostomy and alimentation management. Indications were upfront surgery (34%), a second primary surgery after radiotherapy (28%), or salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy failure (38%). Localizations were the tongue base (44%), tonsillar fossa (28%), pharyngeal wall (22%), and soft palate (6%). T-classifications were T1 (6%), T2 (52%), T3 (20%), and T4 (22%). The mean length of the surgery was 574 min. Two patients were intraoperatively converted to a conventional approach at the beginning of the learning curve. In conclusion, TORS and free flap reconstruction in complex situations were associated with low rates of postoperative complications and satisfactory functional outcomes. They were, however, associated with a renewed learning curve.

Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Locoregional Relapse Prediction in Oropharyngeal Cancers

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence to support surgery or radiotherapy as the best treatment for resectable oropharyngeal cancers with a negative HPV status. Predictive algorithms may help to decide which strategy to choose, but they will only be accepted by caregivers and European authorities if they are interpretable. As a proof of concept, we developed a predictive and interpretable algorithm to predict locoregional relapse at 18 months for oropharyngeal cancers as a first step towards that goal.

METHODS

The model was based on clinical and Pyradiomics features extracted from the dosimetric CT scan. Intraclass correlation was used to filter out features dependant on delineation. Correlated redundant features were also removed. An XGBoost model was cross-validated and optimised on the HN1 cohort (79 patients), and performances were assessed on the ART ORL cohort (45 patients). The Shapley Values were used to provide an overall and local explanation of the model.

RESULTS

On the ART ORL cohort, the model trained on HN1 yielded a precision-or predictive positive value-of 0.92, a recall of 0.42, an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.68 and an accuracy of 0.64. The most contributory features were shape Voxel Volume, grey level size zone matrix Small Area Emphasis (glszmSAE), gldm Dependence Non Uniformity Normalized (gldmDNUN), Sex and Age.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an interpretable and generalizable model that could yield a good precision-positive predictive value-for relapse at 18 months on a different test cohort.