Mycophenolate versus cyclophosphamide for progressive interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis: a 2-year case control study

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evidence-based Recommendations. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use of (a) cyclophosphamide, (b) rituximab, (c) tocilizumab, (d) nintedanib, and (e) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.

Mycophenolate in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rationale: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with mycophenolate. Methods: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases through June 2022 for studies using mycophenolate to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: The literature review resulted in seven studies fitting the inclusion criteria. The systematic review and meta-analyses revealed changes in forced vital capacity % predicted (mean difference [MD], 5.4%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.3%, 7.5%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted (MD, 4.64%; 95% CI: 0.54%, 8.74%), and breathlessness score (MD, 1.99; 95% CI: 0.36, 3.62) favored mycophenolate over placebo. The risk of anemia (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 71.4) was higher with mycophenolate. There were no significant differences between mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide, except risk of premature discontinuation (RR, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9), and leukopenia (RR, 0.1; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.4) favored mycophenolate. The quality of evidence was moderate to very low per GRADE. Conclusions: Mycophenolate use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with statistically significant improvements in disease progression and quality-of-life measures compared with placebo. There were no differences in mortality, disease progression, or quality of life compared with cyclophosphamide, but there were fewer adverse events. The quality of evidence is very low.

Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with cyclophosphamide. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through June 2022 for studies using cyclophosphamide to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Five studies were included; two randomized controlled trials compared cyclophosphamide versus placebo, and one randomized controlled trial and two retrospective case-control studies compared cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate. Compared with placebo, there was a 2.83% reduction in the decline at 12 months for forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted using cyclophosphamide (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-4.87; low evidence). There were improvements in breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index mean difference [MD], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.94-3.86; minimum clinically important difference, 1; moderate evidence) and disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index MD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.04; minimum clinically important difference, -0.14; moderate evidence). There were increased risks of leukopenia and constitutional symptoms using cyclophosphamide, but no difference in mortality. When cyclophosphamide was compared with mycophenolate, there were differences in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted favoring mycophenolate at 6 months (MD, -3.67%; 95% CI, -6.3% to -1.1% unadjusted; MD, -4.88%; 95% CI, -7.3% to -2.5% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), 12 months (MD, -5.90%; 95% CI, -8.4% to -3.4% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), and 18 months (MD, -3.26%; 95% CI, -6.1% to -0.4%; moderate evidence), but not at 24 months. There were no differences in FVC % predicted, mortality, or quality-of-life outcomes, but participants were more likely to prematurely discontinue cyclophosphamide compared with mycophenolate (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.63; high-certainty evidence). Conclusions: A review of the published evidence shows that cyclophosphamide is effective in SSc-ILD compared with placebo, with an increased risk of side effects. However, mycophenolate may be equivocal or better than cyclophosphamide. Clinicians and patients should weigh the potential benefits and risks with respect to individual patient circumstances and preferences.

Heterogeneity of determining disease severity, clinical course and outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic literature review

Objective The course of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is highly variable and different from continuously progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Most proposed definitions of progressive pulmonary fibrosis or SSc-ILD severity are based on the research data from patients with IPF and are not validated for patients with SSc-ILD. Our study aimed to gather the current evidence for severity, progression and outcomes of SSc-ILD.Methods A systematic literature review to search for definitions of severity, progression and outcomes recorded for SSc-ILD was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023.Results A total of 9054 papers were reviewed and 342 were finally included. The most frequent tools used for the definition of SSc-ILD progression and severity were combined changes of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC), isolated FVC or DLCO changes, high-resolution CT (HRCT) extension and composite algorithms including pulmonary function test, clinical signs and HRCT data. Mortality was the most frequently reported long-term event, both from all causes or ILD related.Conclusions The studies presenting definitions of SSc-ILD 'progression', 'severity' and 'outcome' show a large heterogeneity. These results emphasise the need for developing a standardised, consensus definition of severe SSc-ILD, to link a disease specific definition of progression as a surrogate outcome for clinical trials and clinical practice.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022379254.Cite Now.

Expert consensus on the management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤  - 2.5 or ≥  + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero.

RESULTS

Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need.

Pulmonary manifestations of childhood-onset primary Sjogren's syndrome (SS) masquerading as reactive airways disease in a male patient and review of interstitial lung disease associated with SS

BACKGROUND

Sjogren's syndrome (SS) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease involving exocrine glands presenting with sicca syndrome, recurrent parotitis and other extraglandular stigmata. SS is well characterized in the adult population with classification criteria; however, primary SS presenting in childhood is poorly defined and rare in males. Recurrent parotitis is the most common presenting symptom in children with primary SS; however, clinical phenotype in children appears more variable than in adults. The lungs are a common extraglandular location for manifestations of primary SS. However, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is rare in children with primary SS. There are only four published reports of ILD associated with primary SS in female children. Here, we present a very rare case of primary SS in a pediatric male with pulmonary manifestations and review of the literature on ILD in childhood-onset primary SS.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 14-year-old White male with a history of chronic severe asthma, recurrent parotitis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension was referred to pediatric rheumatology for evaluation of a positive ANA. In early childhood, he was diagnosed with persistent asthma recalcitrant to therapy. At age 8, he developed recurrent episodes of bilateral parotitis despite multiple treatments with sialoendoscopy. At age 14, respiratory symptoms significantly worsened prompting reevaluation. Lab workup was notable for positive ANA and Sjogren's Syndrome A and B antibodies. Pulmonary function tests showed only a mild obstructive process. Computed tomography of chest was significant for small airway disease, and lung biopsy was positive for mild interstitial lymphocytic inflammation presenting a conflicting picture for ILD. The constellation of findings led to the diagnosis of primary SS with associated pulmonary manifestations. He was treated with hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil and oral corticosteroids with resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary SS is a rare disease in the pediatric population that is poorly characterized. This case is the very rare presentation of childhood-onset primary SS with pulmonary manifestations in a male patient. ILD associated with primary SS is also very rare with only four pediatric patients reported in the literature. Collaborative effort is needed to develop pediatric specific diagnostic and treatment guidelines in this rare condition.

Immunosuppression use in early systemic sclerosis may be increasing over time

Background

Immunosuppression remains the main treatment for progressing skin involvement, interstitial lung disease and inflammatory joint or muscle disease in systemic sclerosis. This study investigated the pattern and trends in immunosuppressive agents used in early systemic sclerosis (diagnosed before and after 2007) to determine whether the changes in the preferred type, timing and combination of immunosuppression took place over the past decade.

Methods

In total, 397 Canadian Scleroderma Research Group database patients (183 diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and 214 limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis) who had baseline and follow-up visits within 3 years (mean: 1.8 ± 0.8) after disease onset were included: 82% females, age at diagnosis 53 ± 13 years. Bivariate, chi-square, analysis of variance and adjusted regression analyses were used.

Results

In total, 115 diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients (63%) and 62 limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (29%) received immunosuppressive drugs, most commonly methotrexate, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide. In diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, immunosuppressants were prescribed after 2007 more often (74% vs 50%, p = 0.001), especially methotrexate (p = 0.02) and mycophenolate mofetil (p = 0.04), and earlier (peak at 2 years after onset). Immunosuppressive therapy was associated with male gender, interstitial lung disease, anti-Scl70 positivity, ACA negativity and inflammatory joint disease in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and with ACA negativity and a higher modified Rodnan skin score in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the use of immunosuppressants after 2007 was predicted only by ACA negativity in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and by younger age in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Conclusion

Over the past decade, there has been a trend to prescribe immunosuppressants more often and earlier in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients, regardless of modified Rodnan skin score. Methotrexate is being more frequently used, and mycophenolate mofetil has gained favour over cyclophosphamide. Autoantibody status was the most consistent predictor of immunosuppressive therapy.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, the primary focus of pharmaceutical research in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recently, pharmaceutical development has also focused on other forms of ILDs, including connective tissue diseases associated ILD, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ILD. Specifically, the authors review the most recent studies and discuss the most recent research findings and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

Data collected over the past years have confirmed the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs on slowing disease progression in IPF. The usual strategy for CTD-ILD management is represented by the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. There is an urgent need for new target therapies. The concept of progressive fibrosing ILD has emerged in the ILD community in recent years, which has led to grouping several diseases with a common disease behavior to find an effective treatment . At present, selecting the best therapy in ILDs should be reasonably performed on a case-by-case basis through a multidisciplinary team discussion in tertiary ILD centers, taking into consideration patients' symptoms, lung functional trends, and radiological changes.

[Importance of mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis]

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) is a frequent organ complication with considerable mortality. Therapeutically, immunosuppressants are primarily used, particularly cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Recently acquired data also showed an efficacy of the biologics rituximab and tocilizumab. The therapeutic options have most recently been expanded by the approval of the antifibrotic drug nintedanib. It is particularly beneficial in progressive fibrosing courses of ILD despite immunosuppression. The data from controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of CYC and MMF compiled in this review argue for a preferential use of MMF; however, the approval of MMF for this indication is still lacking. This is urgently needed for improved and simplified care of patients with SSc-ILD.

Pharmacological treatments for SSc-ILD: Systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence

Many therapies have been investigated for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), including immunosuppressive therapies, antifibrotic agents, immunomodulators and monoclonal antibodies. There is a high unmet medical need to better understand the current evidence for treatment efficacy and safety. This systematic review aims to present the existing literature on different drug treatments investigated for SSc-ILD and to critically assess the level of evidence for these drugs. A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured literature search was performed for clinical trials and observational studies on the treatment of SSc-ILD with pharmaceutical interventions from 1 January 1990 to 15 December 2020. The quality of each reference was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A total of 77 references were reviewed and 13 different treatments were identified. We found high-quality evidence for the use of cyclophosphamide, nintedanib, mycophenolate and tocilizumab. Therefore, we would posit that the clinical community has four valid options for treatment of SSc-ILD. Further research is mandatory to provide more evidence for the optimal treatment strategy in SSc-ILD, including the optimal time to initiate treatment, selection of patients for treatment and upfront combination therapy.

Updates in Systemic Sclerosis Treatment and Applicability to Pediatric Scleroderma

Juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is a complex multisystem inflammatory-driven disease of fibrosis, requiring multifaceted treatment including pharmacologic therapy, supportive care, and lifestyle modification. Most regimens are adapted from adult SSc treatment given the rarity of the disease. Landmark trials over the past decade in adult SSc have led to 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, and several ongoing trials of other biological agents are underway. Resetting the immune system with autologous stem cell transplant to halt this disease earlier in its course, especially in pediatric onset where disease burden can accumulate, is on the horizon.

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically compares the efficacy and adverse events of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) in patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

METHODS

The EMBASE and PubMed databases were systematically searched to find all relevant studies. Quality assessment, study selection, and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. The mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC)% and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco)% of the patients were selected to be primary outcome measures. Stata software was used for the pooled analysis.

RESULTS

Among 284 titles screened from multiple databases, six studies met the inclusion criteria (one randomized controlled trial, three prospective observational studies, and two retrospective observational studies). The summary weighted mean difference (WMD) of FVC change in the MMF group compared with the CYC group was - 1.17 (95% CI: - 2.713, 0.373; P = 0.137), and the summary WMD of DLco change in the MMF group compared with the CYC group was 2.245 (95% CI: 0.258, 4.232; P = 0.027). Studies enrolled showed that adverse events were less common in the MMF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of MMF with respect to FVC and DLco improvement is comparable to that of CYC, and MMF is preferred on the basis of the occurrence of adverse events. Key Points • A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and adverse events of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide in patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease. • The efficacy of MMF with respect to FVC and DLco improvement is comparable to that of CYC, and MMF is preferred on the basis of the occurrence of adverse events.

Relevance of immunomodulatory therapy for interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that prominently leads to skin and tissue fibrosis. The efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation not only attests to the autoimmune pathophysiology for systemic sclerosis, but also for interstitial lung disease as its most frequent manifestation of fatal organ involvement. Accordingly, a variety of immunomodulatory therapies were tried on patients with systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease. Until very recently, all of these therapeutic approaches constituted off-label treatment for systemic sclerosis, given that neither of these therapies was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency. For tocilizumab, this has now changed with FDA approval in March 2021. Already 2020, nintedanib, which is an antifibrotic drug that does not target autoimmunity, became the first approved drug for interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. The present review analyzes the evidence for immunomodulatory treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. The review focuses on randomized controlled trials, which provides evidence for the effects of drugs such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, rituximab and tocilizumab.

The Treatment of Lung Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients are often affected by interstitial lung disease (ILD) and, although there have been recent treatment advances, it remains the leading cause of death among SSc, with a 10-year mortality up to 40%. African Americans and subjects with diffuse cutaneous SSc or anti-topoisomerase 1 antibodies are most commonly affected. Currently, early ILD diagnosis can be made, and it is pivotal to improve the prognosis. The diagnostic mainstay test for SSc-ILD is high-resolution computed tomography for the morphology and pulmonary function tests for the functional aspects. Treatment planning and intensity are guided by the disease severity and risk of progression. Traditionally, therapy has depended on combinations of immunosuppressants, particularly cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, which can be supplemented by targeted biological and antifibrotic therapies. Benefits have been observed in trials on hematopoietic autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with progressive SSc, whilst lung transplantation is reserved for refractory SSc-ILD cases. Herein, recent advances in SSc-ILD treatment will be explored.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite with a potent inhibitory effect on proliferation of T and B lymphocytes used since the early 1990s for the prevention of acute allograft rejection after organ transplant. MMF is also widely used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases (RDs) and their pulmonary involvement. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of progressive fibrotic diseases of the lung, which is often secondary to RD and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. MMF is considered the main alternative to cyclophosphamide as a first-line agent to treat RD-related ILD or as possible maintenance therapy after cyclophosphamide, with a lower rate of side-effects. However, as for other immunosuppressive agents, the use of MMF in RD-ILD is supported by poor scientific evidence. In this narrative review, we describe the available data and recent advances on the effectiveness and safety of MMF for the treatment of ILD related to RD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Systemic Sclerosis and Pulmonary Disease

Systemic sclerosis is a complex, often progressive, multisystem autoimmune disease. It is commonly categorized into limited cutaneous or diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. There is near universal involvement of skin fibrosis and gastrointestinal dysfunction, but lung disease is not only common but also a most serious complication. Severe lung disease is the top cause of mortality, displacing scleroderma renal crisis as the leading cause of death. Whether there is limited cutaneous or diffuse cutaneous manifestations can be predictive of what type of lung disease that can present in the patient. Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients tend to have pulmonary hypertension whereas diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients tend to have interstitial lung disease. There are more rare phenotypes associated with antibodies Th/To and U3RNP that can have both pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease concomitantly. There are inherent challenges in the management for both pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease but with the focus on early diagnosis for each of these lung complications, treatment may have a higher chance of efficacy.

Rituximab as a rescue treatment added on mycophenolate mofetil background therapy in progressive systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease unresponsive to conventional immunosuppression

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the use of rituximab (RTX) is effective and safe as a rescue therapy add-on treatment to mycophenolate (MMF) in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) in whom conventional immunosuppressants (IS) have failed.

METHODS

Longitudinal retrospective observational study of a cohort of patients with SSc-ILD that started treatment with RTX due to ongoing lung function impairment despite treatment with glucocorticoids and IS (cyclophosphamide and/or MMF). All patients were treated with 2 or more cycles of RTX and evaluated for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included. Before initiation of RTX the mean decline in%pFVC and %pDLCO during the previous 2 years (delta) was -12.9% and -12.5%, respectively. After 1 year of treatment with RTX, a significant improvement in %pFVC (∆+8.8% compared to baseline, 95% CI: -13.7 to -3.9; p = 0.001) and%pDLCO (∆+4.6%, 95% CI: -8.2 to -0.8; p = 0.018) was observed. In addition, there was a significant reduction in the median dose of prednisone and it could be suspended in 25% of patients. At 2 years of treatment, RTX had been discontinued in 9 patients (due to adverse events in 3 cases and inefficacy in 6). In the 15 patients (62.5%) that completed 24 months of therapy, the statistically significant amelioration in pulmonary function test parameters was maintained: ∆%pFVC: +11.1% (95% CI: -17.6 to -4.5; p = 0.003) and ∆%pDLCO: +8.7% (95% CI: -13.9 to -8.3; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, RTX's use as an add-on treatment to MMF appears to be effective as a rescue therapy in patients with a more aggressive SSc-ILD phenotype.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Treatments for Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of head-to-head comparisons of the efficacy and harms of pharmacological treatments for systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

METHODS

We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) in order to compare the effects of different treatments with the placebo on change in forced vital capacity (FVC), change in diffusion lung capacity for CO (DLCO), serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuation for adverse events and mortality in SSc-ILD. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and log odds ratio were estimated using NMA with fixed effects.

RESULTS

Nine randomized clinical trials (926 participants) comparing eight interventions and the placebo for an average follow-up of one year were included. Compared to the placebo, only rituximab significantly reduced FVC decline (SMD (95% CI) = 1.00 (0.39 to 1.61)). Suitable data on FVC outcome for nintedanib were not available for the analysis. No treatments influenced DLCO. Safety and mortality were also not different across treatments and the placebo, although there were few reported events. Cyclophosphamide and pomalidomide were less tolerated than the placebo, mycophenolate, and nintedanib.

CONCLUSION

Only rituximab significantly reduced lung function decline compared to the placebo. However, direct head-to-head comparison studies are required to confirm these findings and to better determine the safety profile of various treatments.

Quantification of Ground Glass Opacities Can Be Useful to Describe Disease Activity in Systemic Sclerosis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the main cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Usually, patients have lung involvement characterized by ground glass opacities (GGOs), but honeycombing (HC) is also possible. The Wells score is a semi-quantitative index, which is able to assess ILD by distinguishing its main components. The aim of this work is to evaluate the Wells score in relation to the disease activity (DA) index. We enrolled 40 consecutive SSc-ILD patients (26 diffuse cutaneous form, dcSSc, and 14 limited form, lcSSc). All patients were evaluated by the European Scleroderma Study Group (ESSG) index, high-resolution computed tomography, transthoracic echocardiogram, pulmonary function tests (PTSs), and nailfold videocapillaroscopy for the number of microhemorrhages (NEMO) score. In our study, the total extent of ILD (TE-ILD), fibrosis and GGOs correlated with dyspnea (p = 0.03, 0.01 and 0.01 respectively), but not with the ESSG index. Considering only the dcSSc patients, TE-ILD and GGOs correlated with the ESSG index (r = 0.5 p = 0.009), while fibrosis grade correlated with disease duration and systolic pulmonary artery pressure. In conclusion, our data suggest that GGO correlates with DA, while fibrosis may be a sign of disease damage. The quantification of pulmonary involvement using the Wells score can be a useful tool for assessing the appropriate treatment in SSc patients.

Comparative efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies for systemic sclerosis related interstitial lung disease: A Bayesian network analysis

Objectives: Immunosuppressive therapies for the treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc related interstitial lung diseases (SSc-ILD) include cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX). The objectives were to compare and rank these therapies in term of forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted and adverse events (AEs).Methods: We present pooled estimates of mean difference (MD) and odds rates (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among different therapies. We also ranked these agents with surface under the cumulative ranking probability (SUCRA).Results: CYC plus AZA had the highest SUCRA probability (70%) on reducing risk of the deterioration of FVC compared with CYC, observation (OBS), MMF and AZA. While for the prevention of the deterioration of DLco, MMF showed the highest SUCRA probability (76%) compared with others. Moreover, AZA showed the lowest probability (32%) for AEs among active interventions.Conclusions: CYC plus AZA was the preferred immunosuppressive strategies compared to others on preventing the deterioration of FVC. MMF resulted with the highest probability as the best in preventing the deterioration of DLco. Monotherapy of AZA was less pulmonary function benefit but related less AEs.

Long-term effects of immunosuppressive therapy on lung function in scleroderma patients

The study aims to analyze the effects of induction treatment with cyclophosphamide (CYC) pulse therapy followed by maintenance treatment with other mild immunosuppressive agents on lung function in scleroderma (SSc) patients. Thirty patients with SSc (mean age 52 years, mean disease duration < 2 years) with forced vital capacity (FVC) ≤ 80% and/or diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco) ≤ 70% were included. Monthly CYC pulses were given for 6 months (induction treatment), followed by 3-monthly maintenance pulses for the next 18 months, and during the next 5 years patients received other mild immunosupressive therapy brought by the competent rheumatologist. The efficacy was evaluated by comparing FVC% and DLco% after 6, 24, and 84 months from the baseline. All patients completed induction and maintenance treatment with CYC. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The rest of 27 patients, during the next 5 years, received other immunosupressive agents (14 azathioprine, 9 methotrexate, and 4 mycophenolate mofetil). Three patients died in the 4 years of follow-up. By 6, 24, and 84 months, the mean FVC and DLco changes were + 0.47 and + 2.10, + 3.30 and - 2.49, and + 1.53 and - 3.76%, respectively. These changes were not significantly different from the baseline values. CYC does not appear to result in clinically significant improvement of pulmonary function but fulfilled criteria of stable disease. Maintenance treatment with other mild immunosupressive agents preserves the benefits achieved during CYC treatment.

Pulmonary function tests as outcomes for systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We performed a systematic review to characterise the use and validation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) as surrogate markers for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) progression.Five electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. Included studies either used at least one PFT measure as a longitudinal outcome for SSc-ILD progression (i.e. outcome studies) and/or reported at least one classical measure of validity for the PFTs in SSc-ILD (i.e. validation studies).This systematic review included 169 outcome studies and 50 validation studies. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was cumulatively the most commonly used outcome until 2010 when it was surpassed by forced vital capacity (FVC). FVC (% predicted) was the primary endpoint in 70.4% of studies, compared to 11.3% for % predicted DLCO Only five studies specifically aimed to validate the PFTs: two concluded that DLCO was the best measure of SSc-ILD extent, while the others did not favour any PFT. These studies also showed respectable validity measures for total lung capacity (TLC).Despite the current preference for FVC, available evidence suggests that DLCO and TLC should not yet be discounted as potential surrogate markers for SSc-ILD progression.

Prediction of progression of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: the SPAR model

OBJECTIVES

To identify the predictive clinical characteristics and establish a prediction model for the progression of mild interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

Patients with SSc from two independent prospective cohorts were included in this observational study. All patients fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, had mild ILD at baseline diagnosed by High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT), available baseline and ≥1 annual follow-up pulmonary function tests and no concomitant pulmonary hypertension or airflow obstruction. ILD progression was defined as a relative decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC)%≥15%, or FVC%≥10% combined with diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide %≥15% at 1-year follow-up. Candidate predictors for multivariate logistic regression were selected by expert opinion based on clinical significance. A prediction model for ILD progression was established in the derivation cohort and validated in the multinational validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 25/98 and 25/117 patients with SSc showed ILD progression in the derivation cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. Lower SpO₂ after 6 min walk test (6MWT) and arthritis ever were identified as independent predictors for ILD progression in both cohorts. The optimal cut-off value of SpO₂ after 6MWT for predicting ILD progression was determined as 94% by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The derived SPAR model combining both predictors (SPO₂ and ARthritis) increased the prediction rate from 25.5% to 91.7% with an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.73 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence-based SPAR prediction model developed in our study might be helpful for the risk stratification of patients with mild SSc-ILD in clinical practice and cohort enrichment for future clinical trial design.

Diagnostic criteria, severity classification and guidelines of systemic sclerosis

Several effective drugs have been identified for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, in advanced cases, not only their effectiveness is reduced but they may be also harmful due to their side-effects. Therefore, early diagnosis and early treatment is most important for the treatment of SSc. We established diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2003 and early diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2011, for the purpose of developing evaluation of each organ in SSc. Moreover, in November 2013, the American College of Rheumatology and the European Rheumatology Association jointly developed new diagnostic criteria for increasing their sensitivity and specificity, so we revised our diagnostic criteria and severity classification of SSc. Furthermore, we have revised the clinical guideline based on the newest evidence. In particular, the clinical guideline was established by clinical questions based on evidence-based medicine according to the New Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual (version 1.0). We aimed to make the guideline easy to use and reliable based on the newest evidence, and to present guidance as specific as possible for various clinical problems in treatment of SSc.

Mycophenolate Mofetil Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Reduces Myeloid Cell Numbers and Attenuates the Inflammatory Gene Signature in Skin

Fewer than half of patients with systemic sclerosis demonstrate modified Rodnan skin score improvement during mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. To understand the molecular basis for this observation, we extended our prior studies and characterized molecular and cellular changes in skin biopsies from subjects with systemic sclerosis treated with MMF. Eleven subjects completed ≥24 months of MMF therapy. Two distinct skin gene expression trajectories were observed across six of these subjects. Three of the six subjects showed attenuation of the inflammatory signature by 24 months, paralleling reductions in CCL2 mRNA expression in skin and reduced numbers of macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells in skin biopsies. MMF cessation at 24 months resulted in an increased inflammatory score, increased CCL2 mRNA and protein levels, modified Rodnan skin score rebound, and increased numbers of skin myeloid cells in these subjects. In contrast, three other subjects remained on MMF >24 months and showed a persistent decrease in inflammatory score, decreasing or stable modified Rodnan skin score, CCL2 mRNA reductions, sera CCL2 protein levels trending downward, reduction in monocyte migration, and no increase in skin myeloid cell numbers. These data summarize molecular changes during MMF therapy that suggest reduction of innate immune cell numbers, possibly by attenuating expression of chemokines, including CCL2.

Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease - individualized immunosuppressive therapy and course of lung function: results of the EUSTAR group

Background

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) is a major cause of SSc-related death. Imunosuppressive treatment (IS) is used in patients with SSc for various organ manifestations mainly to ameliorate progression of SSc-ILD. Data on everyday IS prescription patterns and clinical courses of lung function during and after therapy are scarce.

Methods

We analysed patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2013 criteria for SSc-ILD and at least one report of IS. Types of IS, pulmonary function tests (PFT) and PFT courses during IS treatment were evaluated.

Results

EUSTAR contains 3778/11,496 patients with SSc-ILD (33%), with IS in 2681/3,778 (71%). Glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy was prescribed in 30.6% patients with GC combinations plus cyclophosphamide (CYC) (11.9%), azathioprine (AZA) (9.2%), methotrexate (MTX) (8.7%), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (7.3%). Intensive IS (MMF + GC, CYC or CYC + GC) was started in patients with the worst PFTs and ground glass opacifications on imaging. Patients without IS showed slightly less worsening in forced vital capacity (FVC) when starting with FVC 50–75% or >75%. GC showed negative trends when starting with FVC <50%. Regarding diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), negative DLCO trends were found in patients with MMF.

Conclusions

IS is broadly prescribed in SSc-ILD. Clusters of clinical and functional characteristics guide individualised treatment. Data favour distinguished decision-making, pointing to either watchful waiting and close monitoring in the early stages or start of immunosuppressive treatment in moderately impaired lung function. Advantages of specific IS are difficult to depict due to confounding by indication. Data do not support liberal use of GC in SSc-ILD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1517-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mycophenolate mofetil as a therapeutic agent for interstitial lung diseases in systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an intractable disease that causes fibrosis in all organs. Approximately 40% of patients with SSc have some degree of interstitial lung disease (ILD). One third of patients with SSc and ILD, approximately 15% of all patients, have pulmonary lesions, which slowly progress to respiratory failure resistant to corticosteroid and other treatments. A randomized controlled trial conducted in the United States indicated that one year of treatment with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with SSc-ILD had a significant but modest beneficial effect on lung function, dyspnea, thickening of the skin, and health-related quality of life. However, all the effects, except for a sustained impact on dyspnea, disappeared approximately one year after stopping oral administration of cyclophosphamide. A randomized controlled trial using cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was then held in the United States for 142 patients with SSc-ILD. Treatment of SSc-ILD with MMF for two years or cyclophosphamide for one year both resulted in significant improvements in lung function over the 2-year course of the study. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred less often in patients administered MMF than in those administered cyclophosphamide. MMF is currently not approved for the treatment of SSc-ILD in Japan. Both MMF and cyclophosphamide were effective against ILD associated with SSc and, in particular, MMF was useful in terms of tolerability. When MMF is approved, it should be positioned as one of the first treatment options for SSc-ILD, which will further enhance the treatment of this disease in Japan.

Systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis, also called scleroderma, is an immune-mediated rheumatic disease that is characterised by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs and vasculopathy. Although systemic sclerosis is uncommon, it has a high morbidity and mortality. Improved understanding of systemic sclerosis has allowed better management of the disease, including improved classification and more systematic assessment and follow-up. Additionally, treatments for specific complications have emerged and a growing evidence base supports the use of immune suppression for the treatment of skin and lung fibrosis. Some manifestations of the disease, such as scleroderma renal crisis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, digital ulceration, and gastro-oesophageal reflux, are now treatable. However, the burden of non-lethal complications associated with systemic sclerosis is substantial and is likely to become more of a challenge. Here, we review the clinical features of systemic sclerosis and describe the best practice approaches for its management. Furthermore, we identify future areas for development.

Mycophenolate mofetil for scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease: A real world experience

Background and objective

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains the number one cause of mortality in scleroderma (SSc). Our goal was to determine the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in treating SSc-ILD in a retrospective study.

Methods

A retrospective, computer-assisted search was performed to identify patients with SSc-ILD treated with MMF from 1997 through 2014. We used a novel software tool, Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating (CALIPER), to quantify parenchymal lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography. Lung function was evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months of MMF therapy.

Results

We identified 46 patients (28 females) with SSc-ILD (mean age at diagnosis 55 y) treated with MMF for at least 1 year (majority on 2 gm/day). Twenty-one patients (45.7%) stopped using MMF during the follow up period after the first 12 months, and they took MMF for a median of 2.12 years (range, 0.91–8.93 years). Only 4 discontinued MMF because of disease progression. Compared to baseline, the mean percentage change in forced vital capacity (95% CI) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, was 1.01% (−2.38%-4.39%) (n = 26), 2.06% (−1.09%-5.22%) (n = 31), and −0.07% (−3.31%-3.17%) (n = 30), and the mean percentage change in ILD as measured by CALIPER (95% CI) was −5.40% (−18.62%-7.83%) (n = 18), −1.51% (−14.69%-11.68%) (n = 17), and −8.35% (−20.71%-4.02%) (n = 22).The mean right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) remained stable over the study period.

Conclusions

MMF is well tolerated and slows the rate of decline in lung function in SSc-ILD patients, even at doses lower at 3 g/day.

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: current and future treatment

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has the highest fatality rate among connective tissue diseases and is characterized by vascular damage, inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and various internal organs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) frequently complicates SSc and can be a debilitating disorder with a poor prognosis. ILD is the most frequent cause of death in SSc, and the management of SSc-ILD patients is a great challenge. Early detection of pulmonary involvement based on a recent decline of lung function tests and on the extent of lung involvement at high-resolution computed tomography is critical for the best management of these patients. This article summarizes classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, survival and finally current and future treatment options in SSc-ILD.

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: where do we stand?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and despite recent advances in the treatment is, at present, the major cause of death. Today, an early diagnosis of ILD is possible, and is mandatory to improve the prognosis of the disease. Pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography remain the mainstay for the diagnosis of SSc-ILD, but there is a growing interest in lung ultrasound. Recently, the correlation between severity of fibrosis and some peripheral blood biomarkers has been described. Nonselective immunosuppressors are still the main treatment for ILD, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) most widely used to obtain remission. Novel therapies towards specific molecular and cellular targets have been suggested; in particular, rituximab (RTX) has shown promising results, but further research is needed. It is of paramount importance to define the severity of the disease and the risk of progression in order to define the need for treatment and the treatment intensity. We propose the division of the treatment strategies at our disposal to induce remission into three categories: high intensity (haematopoietic stem cell transplantation), medium intensity (CYC and RTX) and low intensity (azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)). After obtaining remission, maintenance treatment with AZA or MMF should be started. In this review we explore new advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of SSc-ILD.

Management of interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease

The lung is a common site of complications of systemic connective tissue disease (CTD), and lung involvement can present in several ways. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension are the most common lung manifestations in CTD. Although it is generally thought that interstitial lung disease develops later on in CTD it is often the initial presentation ("lung dominant" CTD). ILD can be present in most types of CTD, including rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyositis or dermatomyositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and mixed connective tissue disease. Despite similarities in clinical and pathologic presentation, the prognosis and treatment of CTD associated ILD (CTD-ILD) can differ greatly from that of other forms of ILD, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) can present as a primary vasculopathy in pulmonary arterial hypertension or in association with ILD (PH-ILD). Therefore, detailed history, physical examination, targeted serologic testing, and, occasionally, lung biopsy are needed to diagnose CTD-ILD, whereas both non-invasive and invasive assessments of pulmonary hemodynamics are needed to diagnose pulmonary hypertension. Immunosuppression is the mainstay of treatment for ILD, although data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support specific treatments are lacking. Furthermore, treatment strategies vary according to the clinical situation-for example, the treatment of a patient newly diagnosed as having CTD-ILD differs from that of someone with an acute exacerbation of the disease. Immunosuppression is indicated only in select cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension related to CTD; more commonly, selective pulmonary vasodilators are used. For both diseases, comorbidities such as sleep disordered breathing, symptoms of dyspnea, and cough should be evaluated and treated. Lung transplantation should be considered in patients with advanced disease but is not always feasible because of other manifestations of CTD and comorbidities. Clinical trials of novel therapies including immunosuppressive therapies are needed to inform best treatment strategies.

Treatment of Rapidly Progressive Systemic Sclerosis: Current and Futures Perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by severe and often progressive cutaneous, pulmonary, cardiac and gastrointestinal tract fibrosis, cellular and humoral immunologic alterations, and pronounced fibroproliferative vasculopathy. There is no effective SSc disease modifying therapy. Patients with rapidly progressive SSc have poor prognosis with frequent disability and very high mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews currently available therapeutic approaches for rapidly progressive SSc and discuss novel drugs under study for SSc disease modification.

EXPERT OPINION

The extent, severity, and rate of progression of SSc skin and internal organ involvement determines the optimal therapeutic interventions for SSc. Cyclophosphamide for progressive SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and mycophenolate for rapidly progressive cutaneous involvement have shown effectiveness. Methotrexate has been used for less severe skin progression and for patients unable to tolerate mycophenolate. Rituximab was shown to induce improvement in SSc-cutaneous and lung involvement. Autologous bone marrow transplantation is reserved for selected cases in whom poor survival risk outweighs the high mortality rate of the procedure. Novel agents capable of modulating fibrotic and inflammatory pathways involved in SSc pathogenesis, including tocilizumab, pirfenidone, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, lipid lysophosphatidic acid 1, and NOX4 inhibitors are currently under development for the treatment of rapidly progressive SSc.

Update on systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibody production, small-vessel vasculopathy, and skin and other organ fibrosis. The disease is clinically heterogeneous with most patients having some degree of skin sclerosis with varying organ system involvement. Early disease can be difficult to diagnose, especially with minimal skin sclerosis and absence of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity; however, studies have demonstrated early diagnosis is important as early treatment could potentially lead to better outcomes. New classification criteria have recently been published that have higher sensitivity for detecting early disease thus allowing for a broader spectrum of patients to be represented in clinical trials. Treatment guidelines have been published based on a limited number of randomized-controlled clinical trials; however, there are ongoing phase II and III clinical trials with novel agents that are promising and will change the treatment landscape over the next decade.

Management of Systemic-Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Although scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a significant contributor to both morbidity and mortality, its pathogenesis is largely unclear. Pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomographic scanning continue to be the most effective tools to screen for lung involvement and to monitor for disease progression. More research and better biomarkers are needed to identify patients most at risk for developing SSc-ILD as well as to recognize which of these patients will progress to more severe disease. Although immunosuppression remains the mainstay of treatment, antifibrotic agents may offer new avenues of treatment for patients with SSc-ILD in the future.

Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate in systemic sclerosis. A systematic review

Background

Mycophenolate is increasingly being used in the rheumatic diseases. Its main adverse effects are gastrointestinal, myelosuppression, and infection. These may limit use in systemic sclerosis (SSc) since gastrointestinal involvement is common. The objective of this study is to evaluate gastrointestinal adverse events of mycophenolate in SSc. Secondarily we evaluated other adverse events, and the effectiveness of mycophenolate in skin and lung disease.

Methods

A literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL (inception-2013) was performed. Studies reporting use of mycophenolate in SSc patients, adverse events, modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS), forced vital capacity (FVC), or diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) were included. The primary outcome was gastrointestinal events occurring after the initiation of mycophenolate. Secondary safety outcomes included myelosuppression, infection, malignancy, and death after the initiation of mycophenolate.

Results

617 citations were identified and 21 studies were included. 487 patients were exposed to mycophenolate. The mean disease duration ranged between 0.8-14.1 years. There were 18 deaths and 90 non-lethal adverse events. The non-lethal adverse events included 43 (47.7%) gastrointestinal events, 34 (26%) infections, 6 (5%) cytopenias and 2 (2%) malignancies. The most common gastrointestinal events included diarrhea (n=18 (14%)), nausea (n=12 (9%)), and abdominal pain (n=3 (2%)). The rate of discontinuation ranged between 8%-40%. Seven observational studies reported improvement or stabilization in FVC, and 5 studies report stabilization or improvement in MRSS.

Conclusion

Mycophenolate-associated gastrointestinal adverse events are common in SSc, but not severe enough to preclude its use. Observational data suggests mycophenolate may be effective in improving or stabilizing interstitial lung disease, and skin involvement.

Interstitial lung disease in scleroderma

Systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease of unknown etiology with limited effective therapies. It is characterized by autoimmunity, vasculopathy, and fibrosis and is clinically manifested by multiorgan involvement. Interstitial lung disease is a common complication of systemic sclerosis and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of interstitial lung disease hinges on careful clinical evaluation and pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography. Effective therapeutic options are still limited. Several experimental therapies are currently in early-phase clinical trials and show promise.

Where are we going in the management of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects about 90% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). It is associated with a restrictive lung disease in only 30% of patients and is progressive in an even lower percentage. A low forced vital capacity at presentation, an extent of lung fibrosis >20% as detected by lung high-resolution computed tomography, high serum interleukin-6 levels, anti-topoisomerase I antibody positivity and diffuse cutaneous SSc are each associated with SSc-ILD progression. However, no such association is absolute. Treating patients with a recent deterioration of lung function may allow to capture those with active disease. To date, cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the only drug found to stabilize or improve lung function in randomized clinical trials, but its small beneficial effect is short lived. Therefore, immunosuppressive maintenance therapy after CYC treatment is warranted. At present, however, the best therapeutical strategy after CYC therapy both in responders and in non-responders to CYC is still controversial. Based on a review of the literature, we suggest an approach to the management of SSc-ILD.

Promising new treatment targets in patients with fibrosing lung disorders

The processes of lung fibrogenesis and fibrotic healing are common to a number of conditions with different etiologies. The lungs are the only affected organ in some cases, whereas in others, several organ systems are involved. Therapeutic options can be discussed from various perspectives. In this review, we address the localization of therapeutic targets with regard to cell compartments, including secreted ligands, cell surface, plasma membrane-cytosol interplay, cytosol and nucleus. Complex approach using stem cell therapy is also discussed. As the prognosis of patients with these disorders remains grim, treatment combinations targeting different molecules within the cell should sometimes be considered. It is reasonable to assume that blocking specific pathways will more likely lead to disease stabilization, while stem cell-based treatments could potentially restore lung architecture. Gene therapy could be a candidate for preventive care in families with proven specific gene polymorphisms and documented familial lung fibrosis. Chronobiology, that takes into account effect of circadian rhythm on cell biology, has demonstrated that timed drug administration can improve treatment outcomes. However, the specific recommendations for optimal approaches are still under debate. A multifaceted approach to interstitial lung disorders, including cooperation between those doing basic research and clinical doctors as well as tailoring research and treatment strategies toward (until now) unmet medical needs, could improve our understanding of the diseases and, above all, provide benefits for our patients.

Treating CTDs related fibrotic ILDs by immunosuppressants: "facts and faults"

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are commonly encountered in scleroderma where they significantly influence prognosis. The mainstay of treatment in idiopathic fibrotic ILDs for the past 30 years was based on the combined administration of prednisone and cyclophosphamide (CYC) or prednisone, azathioprine plus N-acetyl cysteine, recently proved ineffective and harmful. Rheumatologists also despite "facts" showing that CYC treatment has no beneficial impact on fibrotic ILDs in scleroderma continue to commit the same, in a manner of speaking, "faults" by "treating their fibrotic ILDs by immunosuppressants." In this issue of the journal, Panopoulos et al. (Lung, 191, 483-489, 2013) recognizing the minimal effect of CYC on fibrotic ILDs in scleroderma patients and the increased use in clinical practice of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an alternative, report that MMF use to replace CYC in this setting is not supported, confirming that restoration of purely fibrotic damage in the lungs remains one of the most challenging fields in medicine.