1
|
De Biasi S, Lo Tartaro D, Neroni A, Rau M, Paschalidis N, Borella R, Santacroce E, Paolini A, Gibellini L, Ciobanu AL, Cuccorese M, Trenti T, Rubio I, Vitetta F, Cardi M, Argüello RJ, Ferraro D, Cossarizza A. Immunosenescence and vaccine efficacy revealed by immunometabolic analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2752. [PMID: 38553477 PMCID: PMC10980723 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47013-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) administered to patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) can influence immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine efficacy. However, data on the detailed phenotypic, functional and metabolic characteristics of antigen (Ag)-specific cells following the third dose of mRNA vaccine remain scarce. Here, using flow cytometry and 45-parameter mass cytometry, we broadly investigate the phenotype, function and the single-cell metabolic profile of SARS-CoV-2-specific T and B cells up to 8 months after the third dose of mRNA vaccine in a cohort of 94 patients with MS treated with different DMT, including cladribine, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, interferon, natalizumab, teriflunomide, rituximab or ocrelizumab. Almost all patients display functional immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Different metabolic profiles characterize antigen-specific-T and -B cell response in fingolimod- and natalizumab-treated patients, whose immune response differs from all the other MS treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara De Biasi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy.
| | - Domenico Lo Tartaro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Anita Neroni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Moritz Rau
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Rebecca Borella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Elena Santacroce
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Annamaria Paolini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Lara Gibellini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Alin Liviu Ciobanu
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
| | - Michela Cuccorese
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale AUSL/AOU Policlinico, Modena, Italy
| | - Tommaso Trenti
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale AUSL/AOU Policlinico, Modena, Italy
| | - Ignacio Rubio
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Francesca Vitetta
- Neurology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, Nuovo Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Martina Cardi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, Nuovo Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Rafael José Argüello
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, CIML, Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Marseille, France
| | - Diana Ferraro
- Neurology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, Nuovo Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Cossarizza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy.
- National Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morrow SA, Baldwin C, Alkabie S. Importance of Identifying Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 2023; 50:813-819. [PMID: 36503630 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2022.334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This article aims to highlight the impact of cognitive impairment on outcomes and quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to review current evidence for the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and other interventions. In addition, we provide clinical practice insights regarding screening and management of cognitive impairment in people with MS. Evidence suggests that cognitive deterioration often accompanies magnetic resonance imaging changes. Neocortical volume and deep grey matter atrophy correlate with cognitive impairment. Similarly, cognitive decline is predictive of a higher lesion burden. Cognitive impairment is an important clinical measure of disability and negatively impacts quality of life. Phase 3 studies suggest that DMTs such as natalizumab, ozanimod and fingolimod may provide long-lasting, clinically meaningful effects on cognition in people with MS. Further data are needed to support the use of adjunct cognitive behavioural and exercise interventions for people with MS who have cognitive impairment. More data are needed to define appropriate management strategies for cognitive impairment in people with MS. Baseline and periodic screening for cognitive impairment and inclusion of cognitive impairment as a clinical trial endpoint will help to inform efforts to manage this important aspect of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Morrow
- London Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Chantal Baldwin
- London Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Samir Alkabie
- London Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carlomagno V, Mirabella M, Lucchini M. Current Status of Oral Disease-Modifying Treatment Effects on Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:848. [PMID: 37508875 PMCID: PMC10376579 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10070848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive impairment represents one of the most hidden and disabling clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this regard, the major challenges are represented by the need for a comprehensive and standardised cognitive evaluation of each patient, both at disease onset and during follow-up, and by the lack of clear-cut data on the effects of treatments. In the present review, we summarize the current evidence on the effects of the available oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) on cognitive outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this systematised review, we extract all the studies that reported longitudinally acquired cognitive outcome data on oral DMTs in MS patients. RESULTS We found 29 studies that evaluated at least one oral DMT, including observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and their extension studies. Most of the studies (n = 20) evaluated sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators, while we found seven studies on dimethyl fumarate, six on teriflunomide, and one on cladribine. The most frequently used cognitive outcome measures were SDMT and PASAT. Most of the studies reported substantial stability or mild improvement in cognitive outcomes in a short-time follow-up (duration of most studies ≤2 years). A few studies also reported MRI measures of brain atrophy. CONCLUSION Cognitive outcomes were evaluated only in a minority of prospective studies on oral DMTs in MS patients with variable findings. More solid and numerous data are present for the S1P modulators. A standardised cognitive evaluation remains a yet unmet need to better clarify the possible positive effect of oral DMTs on cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Carlomagno
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Neurologia, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centro di ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mirabella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Neurologia, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centro di ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Lucchini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Neurologia, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centro di ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kania K, Ambrosius W, Kozubski W, Kalinowska-Łyszczarz A. The impact of disease modifying therapies on cognitive functions typically impaired in multiple sclerosis patients: a clinician's review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1222574. [PMID: 37503514 PMCID: PMC10368887 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1222574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Over the last few decades clinicians have become aware that cognitive impairment might be a major cause of disability, loss of employment and poor quality of life in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis [MS].The impact of disease modifying therapies [DMTs] on cognition is still a matter of debate. Theoretically, DMTs could exert a substantial beneficial effect by means of reducing neuroinflammation and brain atrophy, which are established correlates of cognitive dysfunction. The aim of the study was to review the evidence concerning the effect of DMTs on cognitive functions. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis [ECTRIMS] Library were searched for articles concerning the pediatric and adult populations of patients with multiple sclerosis, including clinical trials and RWD, where psychometric results were analyzed as secondary or exploratory endpoints. Results We reviewed a total of 44 studies that were found by our search strategy, analyzed the psychological tests that were applied, the length of the follow-up, and possible limitations. We pointed out the difficulties associated with assessing of DMTs' effects on cognitive functions, and pitfalls in cognitive tools used for evaluating of MS patients. Conclusion There is a need to highlight this aspect of MS therapies, and to collect adequate data to make informed therapeutic decisions, to improve our understanding of MS-related cognitive dysfunction and provide new therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Kania
- Department of Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Wojciech Ambrosius
- Department of Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Wojciech Kozubski
- Department of Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Alicja Kalinowska-Łyszczarz
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurochemistry and Neuropathology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilken J, Traboulsee A, Nelson F, Ionete C, Kolind S, Fratto T, Kane R, Gandhi R, Rawlings AM, Roesch N, Ozog MA, DeLuca J. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis initiating alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice: LEM-COG study results. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 73:104677. [PMID: 37028124 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alemtuzumab is effective in reducing relapse rate and disability, but limited data exist on its effect on cognitive function in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The present study assessed neurocognitive function and safety associated with alemtuzumab treatment in RMS. METHODS This longitudinal, single-arm, prospective study included people with RMS (aged 25-55 years) who were treated with alemtuzumab in clinical practice in the United States of America and Canada. The first participant was enrolled in December 2016. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to post-baseline (month [M] 12/24) in MS-COGnitive (MS-COG) composite score. Secondary endpoints included Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), Selective Reminding Test (SRT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) scores. Depression and fatigue were assessed using Hamilton Rating Scale-Depression (HAM-D) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)/Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters were assessed when available. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Descriptive statistics were used for the pre-specified statistical analyses. Since the study was terminated early (November 2019) because of operational and resource difficulties, post hoc analyses for statistical inference were performed among participants who had a baseline value and at least one complete post-baseline assessment for cognitive parameters, fatigue, or depression. RESULTS Of the 112 participants enrolled, 39 were considered as the primary analysis population at M12. At M12, a mean change of 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 0.45; p = 0.0049; effect size [ES]: 0.39) was observed in the MS-COG composite score. Improvements were observed in processing speed (based on PASAT and SDMT; p < 0.0001; ES: 0.62), as well as in individual PASAT, SDMT and COWAT scores. An improvement was also noted in HAM-D (p = 0.0054; ES: -0.44), but not in fatigue scores. Among MRI parameters, decreases in burden of disease volume (BDV; ES: -0.12), new gadolinium-enhancing lesions (ES: -0.41) and newly active lesions (ES: -0.07) were observed at M12. About 92% of participants showed stable or improved cognitive status at M12. There were no new safety signals reported in the study. The most common adverse events (≥10% of participants) were headache, fatigue, nausea, insomnia, urinary tract infection, pain in extremity, chest discomfort, anxiety, dizziness, arthralgia, flushing, and rash. Hypothyroidism (3.7%) was the most frequent adverse event of special interest. CONCLUSION The findings from this study suggest that alemtuzumab has a positive impact on cognitive function with significant improvements in processing speed and depression in people with RMS over a period of 12 months. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was consistent with previous studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sferruzza G, Clarelli F, Mascia E, Ferrè L, Ottoboni L, Sorosina M, Santoro S, Filippi M, Provero P, Esposito F. Transcriptional effects of fingolimod treatment on peripheral T cells in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Pharmacogenomics 2022; 23:161-171. [PMID: 35068175 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the transcriptional changes induced by Fingolimod (FTY) in T cells of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Patients & methods: Transcriptomic changes after 6 months of FTY therapy were evaluated on T cells from 24 relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients through RNA-sequencing, followed by technical validation and pathway analysis. Results: Among differentially expressed genes, CX3CR1 and CCR7 resulted strongly up- and down-regulated, respectively. Two relevant genes were validated with quantitative PCR and we largely confirmed findings from two previous microarray-based studies with similar design. Pathway analysis pointed to an involvement of processes related to immune function and cell migration. Conclusion: Our data support the evidence that FTY induces major transcriptional changes in genes involved in immune response and cell trafficking in T lymphocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Sferruzza
- Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.,Neuroimmunology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Clarelli
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Mascia
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Laura Ferrè
- Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.,Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Linda Ottoboni
- Neuroimmunology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Melissa Sorosina
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Silvia Santoro
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Paolo Provero
- Center for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences 'Rita Levi Montalcini,' University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Federica Esposito
- Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.,Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, CNS Inflammatory Unit & INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Effects of fingolimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor agonist, on white matter microstructure, cognition and symptoms in schizophrenia. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 15:1802-1814. [PMID: 32893328 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Several lines of evidence have implicated white matter (WM) deficits in schizophrenia, including microstructural alterations from diffusion tensor (DTI) brain imaging studies. It has been proposed that dysregulated inflammatory processes, including heightened activity of circulating lymphocytes, may contribute to WM pathology in this illness. Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor agonist that is approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Fingolimod robustly decreases the number of circulating lymphocytes through sequestration of these cells in lymph tissue. In addition, this agent improved WM microstructure as shown by increases in DTI fractional anisotropy (FA). In this pilot study, we assessed the effects of fingolimod on WM microstructure, cognition and symptoms in an eight-week, double-blind trial. Forty subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized 1:1 to fingolimod (0.5 mg/day) and placebo. Fingolimod caused significant reductions in circulating lymphocytes (p < .001). In addition, there was a statistically non-significant association (p = .089) between DTI-FA change in the WM skeleton and fingolimod. There were significant relationships between the degree of lymphocyte reductions and increases in FA in the corpus collosum (p = .004) and right superior longitudinal fasciculus ( p = .02), and a non-significant correlation with the WM skeleton. There were no significant fingolimod versus placebo interactions on cognitive or symptom measures. There were no serious adverse events related to fingolimod treatment. Future studies with larger samples and treatment durations are needed to further establish fingolimod's potential therapeutic effects in schizophrenia.
Collapse
|
8
|
Transcriptomic Analysis of Peripheral Monocytes upon Fingolimod Treatment in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Mol Neurobiol 2021; 58:4816-4827. [PMID: 34181235 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-021-02465-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Fingolimod (FTY), a second-line oral drug approved for relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) acts in preventing lymphocyte migration outside lymph nodes; moreover, several lines of evidence suggest that it also inhibits myeloid cell activation. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional changes induced by FTY in monocytes in order to better elucidate its mechanism of action. CD14+ monocytes were collected from 24 RRMS patients sampled at baseline and after 6 months of treatment and RNA profiles were obtained through next-generation sequencing. We conducted pathway and sub-paths analysis, followed by centrality analysis of cell-specific interactomes on differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We investigated also the predictive role of baseline monocyte transcription profile in influencing the response to FTY therapy. We observed a marked down-regulation effect (60 down-regulated vs. 0 up-regulated genes). Most of the down-regulated DEGs resulted related with monocyte activation and migration like IL7R, CCR7 and the Wnt signaling mediators LEF1 and TCF7. The involvement of Wnt signaling was also confirmed by subpaths analyses. Furthermore, pathway and network analyses showed an involvement of processes related to immune function and cell migration. Baseline transcriptional profile of the HLA class II gene HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DPA1 were associated with evidence of disease activity after 2 years of treatment. Our data support the evidence that FTY induces major transcriptional changes in monocytes, mainly regarding genes involved in cell trafficking and immune cell activation. The baseline transcriptional levels of genes associated with antigen presenting function were associated with disease activity after 2 years of FTY treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bartosik-Psujek H, Kaczyński Ł, Górecka M, Rolka M, Wójcik R, Zięba P, Kaczor M. Cladribine tablets versus other disease-modifying oral drugs in achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 49:102769. [PMID: 33516133 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Assuming full control of the relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the main target for practitioners. Disease control could be defined as no clinical relapse, absence of 3-month confirmed disability progression expressed on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), as well as no disease activity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) is a composite endpoint used primarily in clinical trials, comprising these 3 measurements of disease activity. The aim of this study is to compare cladribine tablets (CT) with oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) - fingolimod (FTY), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunomide (TERI) - with regard to NEDA-3 and its clinical (relapse and disability progression) and MRI (no new T1 Gd+ lesions or no new T2 lesions or no enlargement of existing lesions) components occurrence during a 24-month follow-up. METHODS In June 2018, a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane database was performed. Due to the lack of head-to-head trials directly comparing cladribine tablets to oral drugs of interest, an indirect network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied, with placebo as a common comparator. NMA was performed with Bayesian approach and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method for estimating posterior distributions. Additional data used in the analysis were taken from conference abstracts or post hoc analyses of pooled data from the clinical studies. RESULTS Six randomised clinical trials (RCTs) presenting NEDA, with active treatment compared to placebo, were included in the NMA: CLARITY (CT), FREEDOMS and FREEDOMS II (FTY), CONFIRM and DEFINE (DMF) and TEMSO (TERI). The rate of NEDA-3 was significantly higher in cladribine tablets vs DMF: OR (odds ratio)=1.76 (95% CrI [credible intervals]: 1.02-3.03) and TERI: OR=2.78 (95% CrI: 1.60-4.83), but not vs FTY. For the MRI NEDA results were as follows - cladribine tablets vs DMF: OR=1.87 (95% CrI: 1.18-2.97); cladribine tablets vs TERI: OR=6.59 (95% CrI: 4.32-10.09); cladribine tablets vs FTY: OR=1.58 (95% CrI: 1.10-2.29). The comparison of clinical NEDA did not reach significance vs either DMF or TERI and evaluation vs FTY was not possible because of lack of data. CONCLUSIONS Cladribine in the form of tablets was significantly more effective in achieving NEDA-3 than DMF and TERI, but there was no significant difference vs FTY. Cladribine tablets was more effective than all oral comparators considering the MRI NEDA. For clinical NEDA, the superiority vs DMF and vs TERI was not confirmed, and vs FTY evaluation was not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halina Bartosik-Psujek
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Warzywna 1A, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland.
| | | | | | | | - Rafał Wójcik
- Aestimo s.c., Krakowska 36/3, 31-062 Kraków, Poland
| | - Patrycja Zięba
- Merck Sp. z o.o., Aleje Jerozolimskie 142 B, 02-305 Warsaw, Poland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marcin Kaczor
- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawinska 8, 31-066 Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
DeLuca J, Schippling S, Montalban X, Kappos L, Cree BAC, Comi G, Arnold DL, Hartung HP, Sheffield JK, Liu H, Silva D, Cohen JA. Effect of Ozanimod on Symbol Digit Modalities Test Performance in Relapsing MS. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 48:102673. [PMID: 33454584 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive dysfunction, including slowed cognitive processing speed (CPS), is one of the most disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a preferred measure of CPS for MS trials and routine screening. Based on encouraging SDMT results in the phase 3 SUNBEAM trial, these post hoc, exploratory analyses were conducted to further compare effects of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator ozanimod versus intramuscular interferon β-1a on CPS in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). METHODS In the phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, SUNBEAM study, adults (aged 18‒55 years) with RMS (N=1,346) were randomized to once-daily oral ozanimod 0.92 or 0.46 mg, or weekly intramuscular interferon β-1a 30 µg. The study continued until the last participant was treated for 12 months. CPS was measured as part of a secondary endpoint using the SDMT. Exploratory, post hoc analyses evaluated SDMT change and percentages of participants with clinically meaningful (≥4-point) SDMT improvement or worsening at months 6 and 12, and relationship between SDMT and brain volume on magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Ozanimod improved SDMT scores compared with interferon β-1a at months 6 and 12. At month 12, least squares mean difference in SDMT z-scores for ozanimod 0.92 mg versus interferon β-1a was 0.102 (95% CI, 0.031‒0.174, nominal p = 0.0051; standardized mean difference = 0.1376). A greater percentage of ozanimod 0.92 mg‒treated participants had clinically meaningful improvements in SDMT scores versus interferon β-1a at month 6 (30.0% versus 22.2%) and month 12 (35.6% versus 27.9%). Of those with SDMT improvement at month 6, 66.4% of those treated with ozanimod 0.92 mg and 55.9% of those treated with interferon β-1a had sustained improvement at month 12. Brain volume loss was similar for those with SDMT improvement versus worsening at month 12. CONCLUSIONS In these exploratory analyses, ozanimod had modestly beneficial effects on CPS in RMS participants. The effects of ozanimod on SDMT are being further evaluated in an ongoing 3-year clinical trial. SUNBEAM is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02294058) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2014-002320-27).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John DeLuca
- Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052 USA and Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Neurology, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark 07103, NJ, USA.
| | - Sven Schippling
- Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Research, Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zürich and Neuroscience Center Zürich, University of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Pg. Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine, and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Bruce A C Cree
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 48, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- NeuroRx Research and Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - James K Sheffield
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA.
| | - Hongjuan Liu
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA.
| | - Diego Silva
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA.
| | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Millward JM, Ramos Delgado P, Smorodchenko A, Boehmert L, Periquito J, Reimann HM, Prinz C, Els A, Scheel M, Bellmann-Strobl J, Waiczies H, Wuerfel J, Infante-Duarte C, Chien C, Kuchling J, Pohlmann A, Zipp F, Paul F, Niendorf T, Waiczies S. Transient enlargement of brain ventricles during relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. JCI Insight 2020; 5:140040. [PMID: 33148886 PMCID: PMC7710287 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.140040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The brain ventricles are part of the fluid compartments bridging the CNS with the periphery. Using MRI, we previously observed a pronounced increase in ventricle volume (VV) in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we examined VV changes in EAE and MS patients in longitudinal studies with frequent serial MRI scans. EAE mice underwent serial MRI for up to 2 months, with gadolinium contrast as a proxy of inflammation, confirmed by histopathology. We performed a time-series analysis of clinical and MRI data from a prior clinical trial in which RRMS patients underwent monthly MRI scans over 1 year. VV increased dramatically during preonset EAE, resolving upon clinical remission. VV changes coincided with blood-brain barrier disruption and inflammation. VV was normal at the termination of the experiment, when mice were still symptomatic. The majority of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients showed dynamic VV fluctuations. Patients with contracting VV had lower disease severity and a shorter duration. These changes demonstrate that VV does not necessarily expand irreversibly in MS but, over short time scales, can expand and contract. Frequent monitoring of VV in patients will be essential to disentangle the disease-related processes driving short-term VV oscillations from persistent expansion resulting from atrophy. Brain ventricle volumes expand and contract during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, suggesting that short-term inflammatory processes are interlaced with gradual brain atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Millward
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Ramos Delgado
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Smorodchenko
- Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Boehmert
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joao Periquito
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning M Reimann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Prinz
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antje Els
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wuerfel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Infante-Duarte
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Chien
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joseph Kuchling
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Pohlmann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonia Waiczies
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Butzkueven H, Licata S, Jeffery D, Arnold DL, Filippi M, Geurts JJ, Santra S, Campbell N, Ho PR. Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038861. [PMID: 33082194 PMCID: PMC7577060 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To directly compare the efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS This phase 4, randomised, rater- and sponsor-blinded, prospective, parallel-group, clinic-based head-to-head study was conducted at 43 sites in nine countries. Patients were randomised (1:1) to intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks or oral fingolimod 0.5 mg once daily for ≤52 weeks. Enrolment-related early study termination precluded assessment of the primary endpoint (evolution of new on-treatment gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions to persistent black holes). Unplanned exploratory analyses of secondary endpoints evaluated the effects of treatment on the development of new T1 Gd+ lesions and new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, lesion volumes and relapse outcomes. RESULTS The intent-to-treat population comprised 108 patients (natalizumab, n=54; fingolimod, n=54); 63 completed ≥24 weeks of treatment. Due to the limited numbers of events and patients at risk, MRI and relapse outcomes were reported over up to 24 and 36 weeks, respectively. The mean number of new T1 Gd+ lesions was numerically lower with natalizumab than with fingolimod by 4 weeks; accumulation rates were 0.02 and 0.09 per week, respectively, over 24 weeks (p=0.004). The cumulative probability of developing ≥1 lesion at 24 weeks was 40.7% with natalizumab versus 58.0% with fingolimod (HR=0.60; 95% CI 0.31-1.16; p=0.126); the corresponding probabilities for ≥2 lesions were 11.5% vs 48.5% (HR=0.25; 95% CI 0.09-0.68; p=0.007). No significant between-group differences were observed for the other MRI outcomes at 24 weeks. The cumulative probability of relapse over follow-up was 1.9% with natalizumab versus 22.3% with fingolimod (HR=0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.64; p=0.017). Adverse events were consistent with known safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that natalizumab is more efficacious than fingolimod in reducing multiple sclerosis relapses and T1 Gd+ lesion accumulation in patients with active disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT02342704; EUCTR2013-004622-29-IT; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Alfred Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Douglas L Arnold
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- NeuroRx Research, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeroen Jg Geurts
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Section of Clinical Neuroscience, VUmc MS Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sourav Santra
- Biogen (at the time of these analyses), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Pei-Ran Ho
- Biogen (at the time of these analyses), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roos I, Leray E, Frascoli F, Casey R, Brown JWL, Horakova D, Havrdova EK, Trojano M, Patti F, Izquierdo G, Eichau S, Onofrj M, Lugaresi A, Prat A, Girard M, Grammond P, Sola P, Ferraro D, Ozakbas S, Bergamaschi R, Sá MJ, Cartechini E, Boz C, Granella F, Hupperts R, Terzi M, Lechner-Scott J, Spitaleri D, Van Pesch V, Soysal A, Olascoaga J, Prevost J, Aguera-Morales E, Slee M, Csepany T, Turkoglu R, Sidhom Y, Gouider R, Van Wijmeersch B, McCombe P, Macdonell R, Coles A, Malpas CB, Butzkueven H, Vukusic S, Kalincik T, Duquette P, Grand'Maison F, Iuliano G, Ramo-Tello C, Solaro C, Cabrera-Gomez JA, Rio ME, Bolaños RF, Shaygannejad V, Oreja-Guevara C, Sanchez-Menoyo JL, Petersen T, Altintas A, Barnett M, Flechter S, Fragoso Y, Amato MP, Moore F, Ampapa R, Verheul F, Hodgkinson S, Cristiano E, Yamout B, Laureys G, Dominguez JA, Zwanikken C, Deri N, Dobos E, Vrech C, Butler E, Rozsa C, Petkovska-Boskova T, Karabudak R, Rajda C, Alkhaboori J, Saladino ML, Shaw C, Shuey N, Vucic S, Sempere AP, Campbell J, Piroska I, Taylor B, van der Walt A, Kappos L, Roullet E, Gray O, Simo M, Sirbu CA, Brochet B, Cotton F, De Sèze J, Dion A, Douek P, Guillemin F, Laplaud D, Lebrun-Frenay C, Moreau T, Olaiz J, Pelletier J, Rigaud-Bully C, Stankoff B, Marignier R, Debouverie M, Edan G, Ciron J, Ruet A, Collongues N, Lubetzki C, Vermersch P, Labauge P, Defer G, Cohen M, Fromont A, Wiertlewsky S, Berger E, Clavelou P, Audoin B, Giannesini C, Gout O, Thouvenot E, Heinzlef O, Al-Khedr A, Bourre B, Casez O, Cabre P, Montcuquet A, Créange A, Camdessanché JP, Faure J, Maurousset A, Patry I, Hankiewicz K, Pottier C, Maubeuge N, Labeyrie C, Nifle C. Delay from treatment start to full effect of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis. Brain 2020; 143:2742-2756. [DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis, treatment start or switch is prompted by evidence of disease activity. Whilst immunomodulatory therapies reduce disease activity, the time required to attain maximal effect is unclear. In this study we aimed to develop a method that allows identification of the time to manifest fully and clinically the effect of multiple sclerosis treatments (‘therapeutic lag’) on clinical disease activity represented by relapses and progression-of-disability events. Data from two multiple sclerosis registries, MSBase (multinational) and OFSEP (French), were used. Patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, minimum 1-year exposure to treatment, minimum 3-year pretreatment follow-up and yearly review were included in the analysis. For analysis of disability progression, all events in the subsequent 5-year period were included. Density curves, representing incidence of relapses and 6-month confirmed progression events, were separately constructed for each sufficiently represented therapy. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify the first local minimum of the first derivative after treatment start; this point represented the point of stabilization of treatment effect, after the maximum treatment effect was observed. The method was developed in a discovery cohort (MSBase), and externally validated in a separate, non-overlapping cohort (OFSEP). A merged MSBase-OFSEP cohort was used for all subsequent analyses. Annualized relapse rates were compared in the time before treatment start and after the stabilization of treatment effect following commencement of each therapy. We identified 11 180 eligible treatment epochs for analysis of relapses and 4088 treatment epochs for disability progression. External validation was performed in four therapies, with no significant difference in the bootstrapped mean differences in therapeutic lag duration between registries. The duration of therapeutic lag for relapses was calculated for 10 therapies and ranged between 12 and 30 weeks. The duration of therapeutic lag for disability progression was calculated for seven therapies and ranged between 30 and 70 weeks. Significant differences in the pre- versus post-treatment annualized relapse rate were present for all therapies apart from intramuscular interferon beta-1a. In conclusion we have developed, and externally validated, a method to objectively quantify the duration of therapeutic lag on relapses and disability progression in different therapies in patients more than 3 years from multiple sclerosis onset. Objectively defined periods of expected therapeutic lag allows insights into the evaluation of treatment response in randomized clinical trials and may guide clinical decision-making in patients who experience early on-treatment disease activity. This method will subsequently be applied in studies that evaluate the effect of patient and disease characteristics on therapeutic lag.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izanne Roos
- CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
- Melbourne MS Centre, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
| | - Emmanuelle Leray
- Rennes University, EHESP, REPERES (Pharmaco-epidemiology and Health services research) - EA 7449, Rennes, France
| | - Federico Frascoli
- Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, School of Science, Department of Mathematics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, 3122, Australia
| | - Romain Casey
- University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, F-69677 Bron, France
- Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, F-69003 Lyon, France
- EUGENE DEVIC EDMUS Foundation against multiple sclerosis, state-approved foundation, F-69677 Bron, France
| | - J William L Brown
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Dana Horakova
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic
| | - Eva K Havrdova
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, 12808, Czech Republic
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, 70122, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- GF Ingrassia Department, University of Catania, Catania, 95123, Italy
- Policlinico G Rodolico, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Sara Eichau
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, 41009, Spain
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University G. d’Annunzio, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Alessandra Lugaresi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOSI Riabilitazione Sclerosi Multipla, Bologna, 40139, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alexandre Prat
- CHUM MS Center and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, H2L 4M1, Canada
| | - Marc Girard
- CHUM MS Center and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, H2L 4M1, Canada
| | | | - Patrizia Sola
- Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, 41100, Italy
| | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, 41100, Italy
| | | | | | - Maria José Sá
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João and Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
| | - Elisabetta Cartechini
- UOC Neurologia, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche - AV3, Macerata, 62100, Italy
| | - Cavit Boz
- KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey
| | - Franco Granella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, 43126, Italy
- Department of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, 43126, Italy
| | - Raymond Hupperts
- Zuyderland Ziekenhuis, Sittard, Sittard, 6131 BK, The Netherlands
| | - Murat Terzi
- Medical Faculty, 19 Mayis University, Kurupelit, Samsun, 55160, Turkey
| | - Jeannette Lechner-Scott
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University Newcastle, 2308, Australia
- Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, 2305, Australia
| | - Daniele Spitaleri
- Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino, Contrada Amoretta, Avellino, 83100, Italy
| | | | - Aysun Soysal
- Bakirkoy Education and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Istanbul, 34142, Turkey
| | - Javier Olascoaga
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San San Sebastián, Spain, 20014, Spain
| | | | | | - Mark Slee
- Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia
| | - Tunde Csepany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
| | - Recai Turkoglu
- Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Selimiye Mahallesi, Istanbul, 34668, Turkey
| | - Youssef Sidhom
- Department of Neurology, Razi Hospital, 2010, Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
| | - Riadh Gouider
- Department of Neurology, Razi Hospital, 2010, Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
| | - Bart Van Wijmeersch
- Rehabilitation and MS-Centre Overpelt and Hasselt University, Hasselt, 3900, Belgium
| | - Pamela McCombe
- University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, 4029, Australia
| | - Richard Macdonell
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidlberg, 3084, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Dental Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
| | - Alasdair Coles
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Charles B Malpas
- CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
- Melbourne MS Centre, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
- Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, 3128, Australia
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- University of Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, F-69677 Bron, France
- Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, F-69003 Lyon, France
| | - Tomas Kalincik
- CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
- Melbourne MS Centre, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3050, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Pagani E, Storelli L, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Filippi M. Two-year regional grey and white matter volume changes with natalizumab and fingolimod. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91:493-502. [PMID: 32111638 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of fingolimod and natalizumab in preventing regional grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) over 2 years. METHODS Patients with RRMS starting fingolimod (n=25) or natalizumab (n=30) underwent clinical examination and 3T MRI scans at baseline (month (M) 0), M6, M12 and M24. Seventeen healthy controls were also scanned at M0 and M24. Tensor-based morphometry and SPM12 were used to assess the longitudinal regional GM/WM volume changes. RESULTS At M0, no clinical or GM/WM volume differences were found between treatment groups. At M24, both drugs reduced relapse rate (p<0.001 for both) and stabilised disability. At M6 vs M0, both groups experienced significant atrophy of several areas in the cortex, deep GM nuclei and supratentorial WM. Significant bilateral cerebellar GM and WM atrophy occurred in fingolimod patients only. At M12 vs M6 and M24 vs M12, further supratentorial GM and WM atrophy occurred in both groups. Bilateral GM/WM cerebellar atrophy continued to progress in fingolimod patients only. Compared with natalizumab, fingolimod-treated patients showed a significant cerebellar GM/WM atrophy, mainly at M6 vs M0, but still occurring up to M24. Compared with fingolimod, natalizumab-treated patients had a small number of areas of GM atrophy in temporo-occipital regions at the different time-points. CONCLUSIONS Natalizumab and fingolimod are associated with heterogeneous temporal and regional patterns of GM and WM atrophy progression. Compared with natalizumab, fingolimod-treated patients experience accelerated GM and WM atrophy in the cerebellum, while both drugs show minimal regional volumetric differences in supratentorial regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Preziosa
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pagani
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Loredana Storelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy .,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Riccitelli GC, Moiola L, Storelli L, Rodegher M, Comi G, Signori A, Falini A, Filippi M. Effects of Natalizumab and Fingolimod on Clinical, Cognitive, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2020; 17:208-217. [PMID: 31452082 PMCID: PMC7007466 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-019-00781-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies comparing the effects of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are limited. We aimed to compare natalizumab and fingolimod effects on clinical, neuropsychological, and MRI measures in RRMS patients after 2 years of treatment. RRMS patients starting natalizumab (n = 30) or fingolimod (n = 25) underwent neurologic, neuropsychological, and brain MRI assessments at baseline, month (M) 6, M12, and M24. Volumes of lesions, brain, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and deep GM were measured. Fifteen healthy controls (HC) were also scanned at baseline and M24. Treatment groups were matched for baseline variables. At M24 versus baseline, both drugs reduced the relapse rate (p value < 0.001), stabilized disability, and improved cognitive function (fingolimod: p value = 0.03; natalizumab: p value = 0.01), without between-group differences. The natalizumab group had a higher proportion of freedom from MRI activity (67% vs 36%, p value = 0.02) and no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) (57% vs 28%, p value = 0.04). At M24 vs M6, brain (- 0.35%, p value = 0.002 [fingolimod]; - 0.42%, p value < 0.001 [natalizumab]), GM (- 0.62%, p value < 0.001 [fingolimod]; - 0.64%, p value < 0.001 [natalizumab]), and WM (- 0.98%, p value < 0.001 [fingolimod]; - 0.99%, p value < 0.001 [natalizumab]) atrophy progressed at higher rates than in HC, but similarly between treatment groups, whereas only the natalizumab group showed deep GM atrophy (- 0.79%, p value = 0.02) (p value vs fingolimod not significant). In both groups, atrophy progression was correlated with lesion accumulation (r from - 0.49 to - 0.36, p values from 0.013 to 0.05), whereas no correlation was found between clinical and MRI changes. Natalizumab and fingolimod reduce disease activity and improve cognition in RRMS. Natalizumab seems superior to limit lesion accumulation, whereas both drugs similarly modify atrophy progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Preziosa
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 48, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Gianna C Riccitelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 48, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Loredana Storelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Mariaemma Rodegher
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 48, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 48, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Alessio Signori
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Pastore, 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy
| | - Andrea Falini
- Department of Neuroradiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.
- Neurology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 48, Milan, 20132, Italy.
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive impairment is prevalent and debilitating among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). While many pharmacologic treatments have shown good efficacy in reducing clinical relapses, brain lesions, and improving certain physical symptoms, their efficacy for improving cognitive function is not well understood. OBJECTIVES The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for improving cognitive function among persons with MS. METHODS A literature search was conducted through the PubMed and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper, and a third reviewer weighed in if the two reviewers could not reach a consensus. Classification of evidence was determined using the 2017 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria for therapeutic trials. Standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated to compare across studies. RESULTS Eighty-seven journal articles published between 1990 and January 2020 were included in the current review. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of pharmacologic treatments to improve cognitive function in persons with MS. There were many contradictory findings observed in this review, which may be due to possible unidentified moderating treatment response variables and/or lack of standardization in assessment procedures. There was also an overreliance on statistical significance (most papers did not provide sizes of treatment effects), which may not be clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS Higher-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the cognitive efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for MS-related cognitive dysfunction, with cognition as the primary endpoint. Researchers are urged to use standardized criteria (such as the AAN criteria) to guide their research designs. Clinicians should consider effect sizes of studies before deciding whether to prescribe certain medications to ameliorate cognitive symptoms.
Collapse
|
17
|
Barkhof F, Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Li DKB, Bar-Or A, Hartung HP, Belachew S, Han J, Julian L, Sauter A, Napieralski J, Koendgen H, Hauser SL. Onset of clinical and MRI efficacy of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2019; 93:e1778-e1786. [PMID: 31484710 PMCID: PMC6946481 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the onset of ocrelizumab efficacy on brain MRI measures of disease activity in the phase II study in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and relapse rate in the pooled phase III studies in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Methods Brain MRI activity was determined in the phase II trial at monthly intervals in patients with RRMS receiving placebo, ocrelizumab (600 mg), or intramuscular interferon (IFN) β-1a (30 μg). Annualized relapse rate (ARR; over various epochs) and time to first relapse were analyzed in the pooled population of the phase III OPERA (A Study of Ocrelizumab in Comparison With Interferon Beta-1a [Rebif] in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis) I and OPERA II trials in patients with RMS receiving ocrelizumab (600 mg) or subcutaneous IFN-β-1a (44 μg). Results In patients with RRMS, ocrelizumab reduced the number of new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions by week 4 vs placebo (p = 0.042) and by week 8 vs intramuscular IFN-β-1a (p < 0.001). Ocrelizumab also reduced the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions appearing between weeks 4 and 8 vs both placebo and IFN-β-1a (both p < 0.001). In patients with RMS, ocrelizumab significantly reduced ARR (p = 0.005) and the probability of time to first protocol-defined relapse (p = 0.014) vs subcutaneous IFN-β-1a within the first 8 weeks. Conclusion Epoch analysis of MRI-measured lesion activity in the phase II study and relapse rate in the phase III studies consistently revealed a rapid suppression of acute MRI and clinical disease activity following treatment initiation with ocrelizumab in patients with RRMS and RMS, respectively. Classification of evidence This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with RRMS and RMS, ocrelizumab suppressed MRI activity within 4 weeks and clinical disease activity within 8 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA.
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jerry S Wolinsky
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - David K B Li
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Shibeshih Belachew
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jian Han
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Laura Julian
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Annette Sauter
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Julie Napieralski
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Harold Koendgen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| | - Stephen L Hauser
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL Institutes of Healthcare Engineering and Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering (L.K.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology (D.K.B.L.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics (A.B.-O.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty (H.-P.H.), Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (S.B., A.S., J.N., H.K.), Basel, Switzerland; Genentech, Inc. (J.H., L.J.), South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology (S.L.H.), University of California, San Francisco. During completion of the work related to this article, S. Belachew was an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; his current affiliation is Biogen, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Th1Th17 CM Lymphocyte Subpopulation as a Predictive Biomarker of Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients under Dimethyl Fumarate or Fingolimod Treatment. Mediators Inflamm 2019; 2019:8147803. [PMID: 31346315 PMCID: PMC6617925 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8147803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral blood biomarkers able to predict disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have not been identified yet. Here, we analyzed the immune phenotype of T lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood samples from 66 RRMS patients under DMF (n = 22) or fingolimod (n = 44) treatment, by flow cytometry. A correlation study between the percentage and absolute cell number of each lymphocyte subpopulation with the presence of relapses or new MRI lesions during 12-month follow-up was performed. Patients who had undergone relapses showed at baseline higher percentage of Th1CM cells (relapsed: 11.60 ± 4.17%vs. nonrelapsed: 9.25 ± 3.17%, p < 0.05) and Th1Th17CM cells (relapsed: 15.65 ± 6.15%vs. nonrelapsed: 10.14 ± 4.05%, p < 0.01) before initiating DMF or fingolimod treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with Th1Th17CM (CD4+CCR7+CD45RA−CCR6+CXCR3+) cells > 11.48% had a 50% relapse-free survival compared to patients with Th1Th17CMcells < 11.48% whose relapse-free survival was 88% (p = 0.013, log-rank test). Additionally, a high percentage of Th1Th17CM cells was also found in patients with MRI activity (MRI activity: 14.02 ± 5.87%vs. no MRI activity: 9.82 ± 4.06%, p < 0.01). Our results suggest that the percentage of Th1Th17CM lymphocytes at baseline is a predictive biomarker of activity during the first 12 months of treatment, regardless of the treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Cognitive Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis: Recent Advances in Treatment and Neurorehabilitation. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2018; 20:53. [PMID: 30345468 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-018-0538-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article highlights recent progress in research on treatment and neurorehabilitation of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) including pharmacological interventions, physical exercise, and neuropsychological rehabilitation, both in conventional and technology-assisted settings. RECENT FINDINGS The most consistent evidence in terms of improvement or preservation of circumscribed cognitive scores in MS patients comes from moderately sampled randomized clinical trials on multimodal approaches that combine conventional or computerized neuropsychological training with psychoeducation or cognitive behavioral therapy. Disease-modifying treatments also appear to have beneficial effects in preventing or attenuating cognitive decline, whereas there is little evidence for agents such as donepezil or stimulants. Finally, physical exercise may yield some cognitive improvement in MS patients. Despite substantial and often promising research efforts, there is a lack of validated and widely accepted clinical procedures for cognitive neurorehabilitation in MS. Development of such approaches will require collaborative efforts towards the design of interventions that are fundamentally inspired by cognitive neuroscience, potentially guided by neuroimaging, and composed of conventional neuropsychological training and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as physical exercise and therapeutic video games. Subsequently, large-scale validation will be needed with meaningful outcome measures reflecting transfer to everyday cognitive function and maintenance of training effects.
Collapse
|
20
|
Shortening the washout to 4 weeks when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod and risk of disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018; 25:14-20. [PMID: 30014876 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence about the optimal length of washout when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod. OBJECTIVE To study if a washout period of 4 weeks is associated with less disease activity compared to 8 weeks. METHODS 25 patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis were included in an open label, prospective study with a follow-up of 108 weeks. The primary endpoint (PE) was defined as "time to first relapse or MRI disease activity up to week 56". In addition, a recurrent event analysis (REA) was performed up to week 108. RESULTS The PE was not met (HR 0.67, 95% CI [0.22,1.97], p = 0.462). Number of relapses before stopping natalizumab was positively associated with the hazard of relapse (HR 3.91, p = 0.0117, 95% CI [1.36, 11.28]). The REA showed a reduction of the hazard to develop a relapse by 77% (HR 0.23, 95% CI [0.08, 0.69], p = 0.00854) in favor of the cohort with 4 weeks washout. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that switching from natalizumab to fingolimod with a shorter washout of 4 weeks might reduce the risk of disease reactivation after switching.
Collapse
|
21
|
Benedict RHB, Cohan S, Lynch SG, Riester K, Wang P, Castro-Borrero W, Elkins J, Sabatella G. Improved cognitive outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with daclizumab beta: Results from the DECIDE study. Mult Scler 2018; 24:795-804. [PMID: 28485186 PMCID: PMC5971365 DOI: 10.1177/1352458517707345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), with cognitive processing speed being the most frequently affected domain. OBJECTIVE Examine the effects of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular (IM) interferon (IFN) beta-1a on cognitive processing speed as assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). METHODS In DECIDE, patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (age: 18-55 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 0-5.0) were randomized to daclizumab beta ( n = 919) or IM IFN beta-1a ( n = 922) for 96-144 weeks. SDMT was administered at baseline and at 24-week intervals. RESULTS At week 96, significantly greater mean improvement from baseline in SDMT was observed with daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a ( p = 0.0274). Significantly more patients treated with daclizumab beta showed clinically meaningful improvement in SDMT (increase from baseline of ⩾3 points ( p = 0.0153) or ⩾4 points ( p = 0.0366)), and significantly fewer patients showed clinically meaningful worsening (decrease from baseline of ⩾3 points ( p = 0.0103)). Odds representing risk of worsening versus stability or improvement on SDMT were significantly smaller for daclizumab beta ( p = 0.0088 (3-point threshold); p = 0.0267 (4-point threshold)). In patients completing 144 weeks of treatment, the effects of daclizumab beta were generally sustained. CONCLUSION These results provide evidence for a benefit of daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a on cognitive processing speed in RRMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01064401 (Efficacy and Safety of BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process) Versus Interferon β 1a in Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIDE)): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01064401 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph HB Benedict
- UBMD Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Stanley Cohan
- Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center, Providence Brain and Spine Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sharon G Lynch
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Riepl E, Pfeuffer S, Ruck T, Lohmann H, Wiendl H, Meuth SG, Johnen A. Alemtuzumab Improves Cognitive Processing Speed in Active Multiple Sclerosis-A Longitudinal Observational Study. Front Neurol 2018; 8:730. [PMID: 29387035 PMCID: PMC5775967 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several disease-modifying drugs have shown promising effects on cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). Alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, is effective in controlling disease activity, however, has not been evaluated for its effects on cognition in detail so far. OBJECTIVE To explore the influence of alemtuzumab on cognitive impairment in active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) as well as possible clinical and neuroimaging predictors of cognitive changes during the first year of therapy. METHODS Extensive neuropsychological assessment was administered to 21 patients with active RRMS at baseline and again after the second treatment with alemtuzumab (mean time span: 15.05 months). Clinical and routine structural neuroimaging markers were explored for their capacity to predict individual courses of cognitive change. RESULTS Overall cognitive functioning remained stable or improved during the observational period of alemtuzumab treatment on average. Scores on two neuropsychological tests of processing speed significantly improved and clinically relevant individual gains of processing speed were seen in the majority of patients. Linear regression models showed that clinical and routine neuroimaging measures of disease activity could not fully account for these cognitive changes. CONCLUSION Results suggest that alemtuzumab treatment in active RRMS stabilizes overall cognitive functioning and furthermore positively affects cognitive processing speed. Changes in processing speed were independent from clinical and structural neuroimaging parameters of disease activity and may thus represent an underrated and independent outcome measure to evaluate treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Riepl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Steffen Pfeuffer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Tobias Ruck
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hubertus Lohmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Sven G. Meuth
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Andreas Johnen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gurevich M, Waknin R, Stone E, Achiron A. Fingolimod-improved axonal and myelin integrity of white matter tracts associated with multiple sclerosis-related functional impairments. CNS Neurosci Ther 2018; 24:412-419. [PMID: 29316271 DOI: 10.1111/cns.12796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 12/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Fingolimod hydrochloride is an effective immunomodulatory drug in improving relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, data on the neuroradiologic effects on white matter (WM) have not been demonstrated. In this study, we aimed elucidating the impact of 1-year fingolimod treatment on WM integrity in patients with RRMS. METHODS Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was applied to assess axonal and myelin integrity in specific WM tracts of patients with RRMS prior to and 1 year postfingolimod treatment (n = 30). The fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity were analyzed using tract-based spatial statistics on specific regions of interest associated with impaired Expanded Disability Status Scale functional scores before treatment. RESULTS In patients with impaired pyramidal function at baseline (average score 2.3 ± 0.2, n = 25), fingolimod induced a significant increase in FA (P = 0.002) and decrease in RD (P = 0.03) in the corticospinal tract. In patients with impaired cerebellar function at baseline (average score 2.0 ± 0.1, n = 19), significant increases in FA and decreases in RD were observed in the superior (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, respectively) and inferior (P = 0.03, P = 0.05, respectively) cerebellar peduncles. CONCLUSION The observed results suggest increased microstructural integrity and decreased demyelination of damaged WM tracts and support the possible direct mechanism of fingolimod action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gurevich
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Roy Waknin
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Evan Stone
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Anat Achiron
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thomas K, Proschmann U, Ziemssen T. Fingolimod hydrochloride for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017; 18:1649-1660. [PMID: 28844164 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1373093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fingolimod was the first oral and the first in class disease modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis that acts as sphingosine-1-phospathe receptor agonist. Since approval in 2010 there is a growing experience with fingolimod use in clinical practice, but also next-generation sphingosin-1-receptor agonists in ongoing clinical trials. Growing evidence demonstrates additional effects beyond impact on lymphocyte circulation, highlighting further promising targets in multiple sclerosis therapy. Areas covered: Here we present a systematic review using PubMed database searching and expert opinion on fingolimod use in clinical practice. Long-term data of initial clinical trials and post-marketing evaluations including long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability and management especially within growing disease modifying treatment options and pre-treatment constellation in multiple sclerosis patients are critically discussed. Furthermore novel findings in mechanism of actions and prospective on additional use in progressive forms in multiple sclerosis are presented. Expert opinion: There is an extensive long-term experience on fingolimod use in clinical practice demonstrating the favorable benefit-risk of this drug. Using a defined risk management approach experienced MS clinicians should apply fingolimod after critical choice of patients and review of clinical aspects. Further studies are essential to discuss additional benefit in progressive forms in multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Thomas
- a Center of Clinical Neuroscience , University Hospital, Dresden , Dresden , Germany
| | - Undine Proschmann
- a Center of Clinical Neuroscience , University Hospital, Dresden , Dresden , Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- a Center of Clinical Neuroscience , University Hospital, Dresden , Dresden , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ziemssen T, Engelmann U, Jahn S, Leptich A, Kern R, Hassoun L, Thomas K. Rationale, design, and methods of a non-interventional study to establish safety, effectiveness, quality of life, cognition, health-related and work capacity data on Alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Germany (TREAT-MS). BMC Neurol 2016; 16:109. [PMID: 27430352 PMCID: PMC4950609 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0629-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the cell surface glycoprotein CD52, is licensed in Europe since October 2013 as treatment for adult patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In three randomized, rater-blinded active comparator clinical trials studies, alemtuzumab administered in two annual courses, had superior efficacy as compared to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a, and durable efficacy over 5 years in an extension study with a manageable safety profile in RRMS patients. Data on the utilization and the outcomes of alemtuzumab under clinical practice conditions are limited. METHODS Here we describe the rationale, design and methods of the TREAT-MS study (non-interventional long-Term study foR obsErvAtion of Treatment with alemtuzumab in active relapsing-remitting MS). DISCUSSION TREAT-MS is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, long-term study to collect data on safety, effectiveness, quality of life, cognition and other aspects from 3200 RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab under the conditions of real-world clinical practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION As non-interventional trial in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.
| | | | - Sigbert Jahn
- Medical Affairs, Genzyme GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Alexandra Leptich
- Clinical Study Unit, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Raimar Kern
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lina Hassoun
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Thomas
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sadeghi Bahmani D, Gerber M, Kalak N, Lemola S, Clough PJ, Calabrese P, Shaygannejad V, Pühse U, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Brand S. Mental toughness, sleep disturbances, and physical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis compared to healthy adolescents and young adults. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016; 12:1571-9. [PMID: 27390520 PMCID: PMC4930238 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s111208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune demyelinating and inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, afflicting both the body and mind. The risk of suffering from MS is 2.5-3.5 times greater in females than in males. While there is extant research on fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment in patients with MS during its clinical course, there is a lack of research focusing on sleep, psychological functioning, and physical activity (PA) at the point of disease onset. The aims of the present study were therefore, to assess the markers of mental toughness (MT) as a dimension of psychological functioning, sleep disturbances (SD), and PA among patients at the moment of disease onset and to compare these with the corresponding values for healthy adolescents and young adults. METHODS A total of 23 patients with MS at disease onset (mean age =32.31 years; 91% females), 23 healthy adolescents (mean age =17.43 years; 82% females), and 25 healthy young adults (mean age =20.72 years; 80% females) took part in the study. They completed questionnaires covering sociodemographic data, MT, SD, and PA. RESULTS Patients with MS had similar scores for MT traits as those in healthy adolescents and healthy young adults, and equivalent levels of moderate-intensity PA and SD as young adults. MS patients reported lower levels of vigorous PA compared to both healthy adolescents and young adults. CONCLUSION The pattern of the results of the present study suggests that the onset of MS is not associated with poor MT, poor sleep, or reduced moderate-intensity PA. Lower levels of vigorous PA were observed in MS patients. Low levels of vigorous PA may lead to decreased cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with MS and, in the long run, to reduced cardiovascular health and degraded psychological functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena Sadeghi Bahmani
- Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Center for Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders
| | - Markus Gerber
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Sport Science Section, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nadeem Kalak
- Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Center for Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders
| | - Sakari Lemola
- Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry
| | - Peter J Clough
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Pasquale Calabrese
- Division of Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vahid Shaygannejad
- Department of Neurology and Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Uwe Pühse
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Sport Science Section, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Edith Holsboer-Trachsler
- Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Center for Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders
| | - Serge Brand
- Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Center for Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders; Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Sport Science Section, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|