Paracentral retinal holes occurring after macular surgery: incidence, clinical features, and evolution

Anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane peeling

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been an acceptable step in vitrectomy surgeries for various retinal diseases such as macular hole, chronic macular edema following epiretinal membrane (ERM), and vitreoretinal traction. Despite all the benefits, this procedure has some side effects, which may lead to structural damage and functional vision loss. Light and dye toxicity may induce reversible and irreversible retina damage, which will be observed in postoperative optical coherence tomography scans. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage is attributed to ganglion cell degeneration and axonal transport alteration and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer is due to Müller cell damage. Eccentric MHs and recurrence of previous MHs may also lead to vision loss. Iatrogenic retinal damage may cause structural retinal changes without significant vision loss or progression to choroidal neovascularization. The mechanism of persistent macular edema after membrane peeling is still unclear, but it has been related to tractional trauma and blood-retina barrier damage. The reappearance of ERM is another cause of decreased vision after ILM peeling, which might be secondary to incomplete membrane removal. In glaucoma patients, ILM peeling is associated with significantly worsening the mean deviation on the visual field test after the surgery. We discussed various causes of vision loss and structural changes following ILM peeling. These causes may be attributed to the surgical procedure itself or the associated steps, instruments, and dyes used during the ILM peeling procedure.

Japan-epiretinal membrane (J-ERM) registry: A prospective cohort study protocol investigating the surgical outcome of epiretinal membrane

BACKGROUND

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) causes visual impairment such as reduction in visual acuity and metamorphopsia due to retinal traction. With the improvement of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS), the surgery of ERM has significantly advanced. However, there have been no large-scale studies on the following: (1) how to evaluate visual impairment in ERM, (2) the relationship between OCT findings and visual function, (3) when is the optimal timing of surgery, and (4) the relationship between the surgical instruments as well as techniques and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to obtain evidence regarding these ERM surgeries.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is a prospective, multicenter cohort study of ERM surgery in Japan from March 1, 2023, to March 31, 2027 (UMIN000048472, R-3468-2). Patients who underwent ERM surgery during the study period and agreed to participate in this study will be included. The goal is to have a total of 5,000 eyes surgically treated for ERM. The following data will be collected: age, gender, medical history, subjective symptoms, visual function before and 6 and 12 months after surgery, clinical findings, OCT data, surgical technique, instruments used in surgery, and complications.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will support the surgical decisions and procedures in ERM practices.

Time course of eccentric macular hole formation after pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane detected by optical coherence tomography

Purpose

This case report aims to describe the detailed time course of eccentric macular hole (MH) formation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for epiretinal membrane (ERM) treatment, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Observations

A 60-year-old male patient presented to our hospital with complaints of blurred vision and distortion in his left eye. He was diagnosed with an ERM in the affected eye and subsequently underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The patient's initial postoperative course was unremarkable; however, one month later, macular edema worsened, as evidenced by OCT findings. Initially, the edema was observed in both nasal and temporal to the fovea. However, four months postoperatively, the retina fluid in the area nasal to the fovea resolved, and the resolution was delayed in the area temporal to the fovea. At 18 months postoperatively, an eccentric macular hole was detected in the temporal to the fovea. The patient remained asymptomatic, and at the two-year follow-up, the eccentric macular hole demonstrated no signs of enlargement.

Conclusions and Importance

This case demonstrates the progression of an unusual asymptomatic parafoveal full-thickness retinal hole after PPV for ERM treatment. Since the development of this condition may occur over a more extended postoperative period than previously reported, long-term patient monitoring is essential following ERM or MH surgery.

The Cosine Law to Choose the Correct Forceps Shaft Length for Macular Surgery in Highly Myopic Eyes

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a mathematical analogy between the Pythagorean theorem using the axial a-scan measurement, i.e., the distance between the central cornea and the sclerotomy, and the lengths of the forceps in eyes of patients with all axial lengths.

METHODS

We used the Pythagorean equation (c 2 = a 2 + b 2 ) to calculate the adequate shaft length of the forceps to use in macular surgery, especially in highly myopic eyes, where c 2 represents the axial length (hypotenuse); b 2 the sum of the corneal ray and distance between the corneal limbus and the sclerotomy (base side); and a 2 the distance between the sclerotomy and the fovea (perpendicular side).

RESULTS

We reproduced the cosine law to estimate the distance between the sclerotomy and the fovea. The distance between the sclerotomy and the foveal area is shorter than the axial length and can become smaller based on the distance from the sclerotomy to the corneal limbus.

CONCLUSION

This simple mathematical formula is useful when performing surgery in highly myopic eyes, in which there can be difficulties reaching the macular area.

Development of an Eccentric Macular Hole Followed by Reopening of the Original Macular Hole as a Long-term Sequelae of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Focal Laser Photocoagulation: A Case Report

A macular hole (MH) is a widely known disease among ophthalmologists. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a standard technique for full-thickness MHs. However, the recurrence of MHs is sometimes seen. In addition, an eccentric MH is known to rarely occur after vitrectomy. An eccentric MH has been considered to require no therapeutic intervention because of its lack of increase in size. This study reports a case of two MHs (a recurrent MH and an enlarged eccentric MH) developed after laser photocoagulation around the injured retina caused by ILM peeling at the initial surgery. A 56-year-old woman presented with an idiopathic MH in her left eye and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was decreased to 20/80. She underwent phacoemulsification and vitrectomy combined with posterior hyaloid removal, ILM peeling, and 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade.  During the ILM peeling, we performed laser photocoagulation around the injured retina within the arcade. The MH was successfully closed and her BCVA was improved to 20/20 one month after surgery. Eight months after surgery, an eccentric MH occurred next to the photocoagulation spots. However, her BCVA remained 20/20; thus, we just followed up on her eye. Six years after surgery, her BCVA was decreased to 20/200. The eccentric MH increased in size and the original MH re-opened. The second vitrectomy was performed, but ILM had been already peeled within the arcade during the previous surgery and a usable sufficient size of ILM which could be auto-transplanted to the holes was not obtained. Thus, free flaps of the posterior lens capsule were harvested and placed within each hole. Two holes were successfully closed and her BCVA improved to 10/20 at three months after the surgery. Laser photocoagulation around the injured retina derived from ILM peeling may be a risk for recurrent MHs. .

EFFECT OF LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION ON MACULAR EDEMA ASSOCIATED WITH MACULAR HOLES

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of laser therapy to barricade eccentric full-thickness macular hole with associated cystoid macular edema.

METHODS

We report two patients who developed an eccentric full-thickness macular hole with persistent cystoid macular edema after pars plan vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peel for epiretinal membrane and the results of argon laser therapy.

RESULTS

Barricade argon laser therapy was applied concentric to the full-thickness macular hole. Associated cystoid macular edema was noted to resolve within 1 to 3 months of therapy in both cases.

CONCLUSION

Barricade laser therapy surrounding a macular hole can lead to resolution of associated cystoid macular edema. Pathogenic mechanisms to explain this favorable outcome are discussed.

Epiretinal membrane: A review

The prevalence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) is 7% to 11.8%, with increasing age being the most important risk factor. Although most ERM is idiopathic, common secondary causes include cataract surgery, retinal vascular disease, uveitis and retinal tears. The myofibroblastic pre-retinal cells are thought to transdifferentiate from glial and retinal pigment epithelial cells that reach the retinal surface via defects in the internal limiting membrane (ILM) or from the vitreous cavity. Grading schemes have evolved from clinical signs to ocular coherence tomography (OCT) based classification with associated features such as the cotton ball sign. Features predictive of better prognosis include absence of ectopic inner foveal layers, cystoid macular oedema, acquired vitelliform lesions and ellipsoid and cone outer segment termination defects. OCT-angiography shows reduced size of the foveal avascular zone. Vitrectomy with membrane peeling remains the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic ERMs. Additional ILM peeling reduces recurrence but is associated with anatomical changes including inner retinal dimpling.

Simultaneous presentation of idiopathic macular and posterior full-thickness retinal holes successfully treated with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique

Purpose

To report an unusual non-iatrogenic case of central macular and posterior full-thickness retinal holes (FTRHs).

Observations

A 60-year-old man presented with a progressive visual loss in the right eye. A complete ophthalmological evaluation including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, fundus examination and spectral - domain optical coherence tomography (SD–OCT) was performed.

Fundus examination and SD-OCT confirmed the presence of simultaneous macular and posterior FTRHs. A 25-gauge vitrectomy was performed and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was grasped and peeled off around the two holes. A fragment of the peeled-off ILM anchored on the FTRHs edges was left and inserted into the gaps.

Closure of both retinal holes was achieved at 1-month, and BCVA improved from 20/630 at baseline to 20/63 at month 3. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded.

Conclusions and Importance

Inverted ILM flap technique represents a good treatment option in this rare non-iatrogenic condition, allowing a good anatomical and functional recovery.

ATYPICAL MACULAR HOLES

PURPOSE

To study the etiology, clinical features, management options, and visual prognosis in various types of atypical macular holes (MHs).

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed, which focused on the etiopathogenesis of atypical or secondary MHs, their differentiating clinical features, management strategies, and varied clinical outcomes. Idiopathic or age-related, myopic, and traumatic MHs were excluded.

RESULTS

Atypical or secondary MHs arise out of concurrent ocular pathologies (dystrophy, degeneration, or infections) and laser/surgery. The contributing factors may be similar to those responsible for idiopathic or typical MHs, i.e., tangential or anteroposterior vitreofoveal traction or cystoid degeneration. The management is either observation or treatment of the underlying cause. The prognosis depends on the background pathology, duration of disease, and baseline visual acuity governed by the size of MH and morphologic health of underlying RPE and photoreceptors. The closer the morphology of atypical MH is to that of an idiopathic MH, the better the surgical outcome is.

CONCLUSION

With the advancements in retinal imaging, atypical MHs are now more frequently recognized. With increasing understanding of the underlying disease processes, and improvement in investigations and surgical treatment, management of atypical MHs may improve in the future.

Spontaneous closure of secondary eccentric macular holes following vitreoretinal surgery

PURPOSE

To report two cases of secondary eccentric macular holes that developed following vitrectomy and present their outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational case report CASE DESCRIPTION:: A 69-year-old female and a 57-year-old male developed secondary paracentral retinal hole following vitrectomy surgery for stage 4 macular hole and proliferative diabetic retinopathy respectively. In case 1, the hole was left untreated while in case 2, laser photocoagulation was done around the paracentral retinal hole. In both cases, spontaneous closure of the paracentral retinal holes was noted 12-week and 3-week following presentation respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary eccentric retinal holes are extremely rare following vitrectomy. The pathogenesis of MHs in our cases is most consistent with contraction of the residual ILM or preretinal fibrous tissue. Spontaneous closure of small eccentric retinal holes can occur as well which to the best of our knowledge has not yet been reported in literature.

Postoperative eccentric macular holes after surgery for vitreomacular interface diseases

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of postoperative eccentric macular hole (ECMH) after epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole (MH), and idiopathic vitreomacular traction (VMT) surgery and discuss the underlying possible mechanisms.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out for 711 eyes of 711 consecutive patients who underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ERM (396 eyes), MH (268 eyes), and VMT (47 eyes) surgery between 2010 and 2016. Mean follow-up time was 19 months.

RESULTS

Eight patients developed ECMH (1.12%). Four of the patients were ERM, three patients were idiopathic full thickness MH, and one patient was ERM and lamellar pseudohole. There was no ECMH in patients with VMT. The average time of hole formation after vitrectomy was 7.25 weeks with a range from 2 to 15 weeks. Three patients developed 2 ECMH, and others had 1 ECMH. The location of the ECMH was mostly in the temporal of fovea. All patients were asymptomatic. No retinal detachment or choroidal neovascularization occurred in any patient and no additional intervention was attempted in the postoperative period in any case.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative ECMH may be seen after vitreomacular interface surgery. They are mostly asymptomatic, usually do not require additional intervention and often located in the parafoveal area. ILM peeling-induced muller cell damage, residual ILM contraction, and iatrogenic trauma may play a role as the underlying cause in our case series.

Optic disc pit maculopathy: a review of diagnosis and treatment

Optic disc pit is a rare congenital defect which appears as a circumscribed greyish depression in the lamina cribrosa. Serous macular detachment is one of the most visually debilitating complications of optic disc pit, affecting 25-75 per cent of patients. Although there is a wide variety of treatment modalities available with varying degrees of success, there is yet no consensus in the optimal management of optic disc pit-associated maculopathy. This review discusses the literature on the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment options.

Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in the Management of Retinal Detachment due to Paracentral Retinal Breaks

Purpose

To describe the technique and outcomes of using either inverted or free internal limiting membrane flap in the management of retinal detachment due to paracentral retinal breaks.

Methods

This retrospective observational case series includes nine patients who received surgery for retinal detachment due to paracentral retinal breaks developed either from primary rhegmatogenous origin, or secondary iatrogenic retinal breaks after prior membrane peeling, or during surgery for tractional retinal detachment. Either inverted or free internal limiting membrane flaps were inserted in the identified breaks, followed by air fluid exchange and gas tamponade. Visual acuity and structural changes were evaluated.

Results

Nine eyes were included. One had primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, one had highly myopic eye with peripapillary atrophic hole, three had secondary retinal detachment after membrane peeling for foveoschisis or macular pucker, one had recurrent retinal detachment due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy, one had combination of tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and two had iatrogenic breaks during surgery. The retinal breaks of all eyes were sealed with retina attached postoperatively. Visual acuity in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution improved from 1.18 ± 0.55 preoperatively to 0.74 ± 0.47 postoperatively (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Internal limiting membrane flap technique can be a surgical approach selectively for retinal detachment due to paracentral retinal breaks with difficulty for laser application. The retina can be attached successfully and achieve good visual outcome without major complication. This trial is registered with NCT03707015.

Successful Treatment of a Retinal Detachment Secondary to Multiple Eccentric Macular Holes With Autologous Lens Capsular Flap Transplantation

The authors report a case of a retinal detachment secondary to multiple eccentric macular holes (MEMHs) following an uneventful pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel, successfully treated by autologous lens capsule graft. Anatomical and functional changes were also evaluated. Autologous lens capsule graft is a safe and effective treatment for MEMHs that may improve anatomical and functional results. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:901-903.].

TO PEEL OR NOT TO PEEL THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES

BACKGROUND

Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) have been described for more than 150 years. Currently, they are a common indication for vitreoretinal surgery. Recently, there has been an increasing trend to peel the internal limiting membrane (ILM). Although ILM peeling has generally been accepted as a fundamental step in macular hole repair, its current role in ERM remains controversial.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

Proponents of ILM peeling argue that peeling of the ILM reduces the recurrence rate and facilitates a greater resolution of retinal folds. Opponents of ILM peeling show that the visual outcomes between eyes that undergo ILM peeling and those that do not have their ILM peeled are the same. Stripping of the ILM removes the Müller cell footplates, so it is reasonable to expect some Müller cell dysfunction. Adverse events such as eccentric paracentral macular holes, macular microscotomata, and retinal dimpling have been associated with ILM peeling.

CONCLUSION

Internal limiting membrane peeling does not improve the functional outcomes after ERM surgery. Internal limiting membrane peeling reduces ERM recurrences, but many recurrences are not clinically significant. It remains unclear what the long-term effects of ILM peeling are. We should err on the side of caution and avoid routine ILM peeling in primary idiopathic ERM cases and should reserve it for recurrent and high risk of recurrence cases.

Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Outcomes in Eyes with Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits: A Case Control Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery in eyes with subretinal drusenoid deposits (SRDDs) and to compare them with those with isolated ERM.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ERM peeling.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five patients with SRDDs on spectral-domain (SD)-OCT who underwent surgery for ERM were included in the study. From the same cohort, for each case, we selected 2 age-matched control participants (50 eyes with isolated ERM). Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) also was matched as closely as possible.

METHODS

All participants underwent PPV and ERM peel for primary ERM.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative BCVA, improvement in BCVA, preoperative and postoperative central macular thickness, surgical complications, and development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were recorded.

RESULTS

At final examination, mean postoperative BCVA was significantly less for eyes with SRDDs (0.51 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] vs. 0.21 logMAR; P = 0.0001). Eyes with SRDDs demonstrated less improvement in BCVA after ERM surgery (0.13 logMAR vs. 0.30 logMAR; P = 0.0032). Eyes with SRDDs were significantly less likely to gain 2 or more Snellen lines of BCVA after ERM surgery (28% vs. 56%; P = 0.028). Three of 25 patients (12%) undergoing ERM surgery showed worsening of Snellen BCVA by 2 lines or more. Three of 25 eyes (12%) with SRDDs demonstrated advanced AMD after surgery, compared with 0 participants in the control group (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Epiretinal membrane surgery in eyes with SRDDs is associated with less favorable visual outcomes. Fewer patients demonstrate gain in BCVA, whereas a significant number show a deleterious decline. After surgery, AMD incidence seems high and patients may have an increased risk of raised intraocular pressure. These findings require further study to establish whether this represents a causal relationship. Surgeons should be vigilant for these complications. Appropriate patient counseling during the consenting process must be made.

Multiple extrafoveal macular holes following internal limiting membrane peeling

Objective

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been the standard of treatment for macular holes. Besides, causing retinal nerve fiber layer surface abnormality, postoperative extrafoveal multiple retinal holes is a rare phenomenon following ILM peeling. We report an unusual complication of eight extrafoveal macular holes occurring following ILM peeling.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male presented with complaints of decreased and distorted vision in the right eye. He was diagnosed as having epiretinal membrane with lamellar macular hole. He underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy, brilliant blue assisted ILM peeling and fluid gas exchange. Intraoperatively, ILM was found to be adherent to the underlying neurosensory retina. One month after cataract surgery, he underwent YAG capsulotomy in the right eye. He complained of visual distortion. His fundus evaluation in the right eye showed multiple (eight) extrafoveal retinal holes temporal to the macula clustered together.

Conclusion

This case demonstrated that peeling of ILM, especially when it is adherent to the underlying neurosensory retina, may cause unwanted mechanical trauma to the inner retina. Glial apoptosis and neuronal degeneration may presumably play a role in delayed appearance of multiple (eight) extrafoveal macular holes, which has not been reported earlier.

Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: A Case Report

Introduction

Postoperative eccentric macular hole formation is an uncommon complication after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane (ERM). We present a case of eccentric macular hole formation after PPV for ERM without ILM peeling.

Case report

A 68-year-old male patient presented with ERM and visual acuity of 6/24 in his left eye. He underwent 23-gauge PPV without ILM peeling for treatment of ERM. One week postoperatively the retina was attached and the epiretinal membrane was successfully removed, while visual acuity was 6/9. One month after PPV, a single eccentric retinal hole below the macula was detected using fundoscopy and subsequently confirmed by optical coherence tomography. At this time the visual acuity was 6/9 and the patient reported no symptoms. No further intervention was attempted and at the 9-month follow-up, the visual acuity and the size of the eccentric macular hole remained stable.

Conclusion

Eccentric macular holes can be developed after PPV even without ILM peeling and are usually managed conservatively by observation.

Vitrectomy in high myopia: a narrative review

Pathologic myopia is associated with degenerative changes of the globe, especially at the posterior pole. Eyes affected by pathologic myopia have higher odds to undergo posterior segment surgery and, in those eyes, vitreoretinal surgery is challenging. Many practical tips and tricks can make the surgical procedures simpler, significantly preventing sight-threatening intra- and post-operative complications. Moreover, novel surgical techniques and technological advancements (i.e. ad-hoc instrumentation, minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery, filters, dye staining, intraoperative optical coherence tomography and 3-dimensional surgery) may play role in highly myopic eyes. The aim of the present work is to review practical tips and tricks, novel surgical techniques and technological advancements.

Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole: A Case Report

Introduction

Postoperative eccentric macular hole (MH) formation is an uncommon complication after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for epiretinal membrane or MH treatment. Herein, we present a case of eccentric MH formation after PPV with ILM peeling for MH.

Case Description

A 72-year-old female patient underwent 23-gauge PPV with ILM peeling for idiopathic MH in her right eye. The visual acuity was 6/24 in the right eye. One week postoperatively the retina was attached and the MH seemed to be closed, while visual acuity was 6/12. One month after PPV, there was a single eccentric retinal hole below the macula, which was detected at the fundoscopy and was confirmed by OCT. The visual acuity was 6/9 and the patient referred no symptoms. No further intervention was attempted, and at the 6-month follow-up the visual acuity and the size of the eccentric MH remained stable.

Conclusions

Eccentric MHs can develop after PPV and are usually managed conservatively by observation.

Postoperative eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling

The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of eccentric macular holes presenting after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatment of macular pathology and discuss the pathogenesis of holes formation. A retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case-series study of five patients who developed eccentric macular holes postoperatively following vitrectomy in 198 consecutive patients who underwent ILM peeling for idiopathic macular hole and epiretinal membrane formation between 2008 and 2015. Five patients (2.5 %) developed full-thickness eccentric macular holes postoperatively. Three patients presented with a single eccentric macular hole, one patient had an eccentric hole after a failed idiopathic macular hole surgery and one patient developed four eccentric macular holes. The mean diameter of the holes was 584 μm (range 206-1317 μm) and the average time of holes formation after vitrectomy was 27.7 weeks (range 1-140 weeks). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity ranged from "counting fingers" to 20/25. The eyes with the holes distant from the fovea had the best final visual acuity. No further intervention was attempted and no complications occurred. The mean follow-up time was 26.8 months. The postoperative macular holes after vitrectomy and ILM peeling were variable in number, size, and time of appearance but remained stable and were not associated with any complications. The pathogenesis of macular holes is most consistent with contraction of the residual ILM or secondary epimacular proliferation probably stimulated by ILM peeling.

Complications of Macular Peeling

Macular peeling refers to the surgical technique for the removal of preretinal tissue or the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in the macula for several retinal disorders, ranging from epiretinal membranes (primary or secondary to diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment…) to full-thickness macular holes, macular edema, foveal retinoschisis, and others. The technique has evolved in the last two decades, and the different instrumentations and adjuncts have progressively advanced turning into a safer, easier, and more useful tool for the vitreoretinal surgeon. Here, we describe the main milestones of macular peeling, drawing attention to its associated complications.

Risk factors for development of full-thickness macular holes after pars plana vitrectomy for myopic foveoschisis

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for development of secondary full-thickness macular holes after pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 42 eyes (42 patients) treated with pars plana vitrectomy (vitreous separation, internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas tamponade) for myopic foveoschisis with and without a retinal detachment but without a macular hole from January 2002 through June 2012. Cataract surgery was performed in all phakic eyes. Patients were followed up for 6 months after the initial surgery, and optical coherence tomography images were obtained at every visit. The factors associated with development of postoperative full-thickness macular holes were investigated.

RESULTS

A postoperative macular hole developed in 8 (19.0%) eyes. No significant correlations of age (P = .369), axial length (P = .113), visual acuity (P = .859), foveal status (P = .331), posterior staphyloma (P = 1.000), or chorioretinal atrophy (P = .837) were found between patients with and without secondary macular holes. Among the characteristics seen on the optical coherence tomography images, the percentage of eyes with an inner segment/outer segment junction defect was significantly (P = .013, Fisher exact test) higher in patients with a macular hole than in those without a macular hole. Logistic regression analysis showed that only an inner segment/outer segment junction defect (P = .018) was a significant risk factor for development of secondary macular holes.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary macular holes can develop in myopic foveoschisis after pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. A preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction defect can be a risk factor for development of a macular hole.

Pneumatic tools for vitreoretinal surgery

One of the difficulties of microsurgery is learning how to control physiological tremors. The pneumatic tool eliminates the physiological tremor, but no tactile feedback is provided. The manual tremor when closing the forceps is completely eliminated and the exact target can be more easily grabbed. Forceps closure pressure can rise up to 50 psi, whereas the scissors can be used in two modes: multicut and proportional. When performing bimanual surgery the pedal range is divided into two steps: in the first step, the forceps are controlled, and in the second step, the forceps remain closed. At the same time the scissors start to work in the preselected mode. No adverse events occurred and no iatrogenic retinal breaks were produced. Precision and control sensation were a grateful surprise.