Baseline clinical features predict visual outcome in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion

Poor response to first intravitreal injection for predicting unfavorable outcomes of retinal vein occlusion related macular edema

PURPOSES

To screen key indicators leading to unfavorable outcomes of retinal vein occlusion related macular edema (RVO-ME) within long-term follow-up duration and to evaluate their predictive values.

METHODS

A study involving patients with RVO-ME was conducted between April 2021 and September 2022. All eligible patients were divided into two groups (favorable and unfavorable group) according to their final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and whether neovascular glaucoma (NVG) occurred. The unfavorable group was further divided into subgroups 1 (with BCVA of ≥ 20/400 and < 20/60 and without NVG) and 2 (blindness group, with BCVA of < 20/400 or with NVG). Demographic, past medical history, ocular characteristics and blood parameters were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 73 eyes from 73 Chinese Han patients (34 males vs. 39 females) with RVO-ME were enrolled. In multivariable regression analysis of continuous variables for unfavorable results, 1-month BCVA after the first intravitreal injection (IVI) was an independent risk factor (odds ratios (ORs) = 2.313, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.387-3.858, P = 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of 1-month BCVA after the first IVI for predicting low vision and blindness was 0.948 (95% CI 0.859-1.000, P < .001) and 0.892 (95% CI 0.744-1.000, P < .001), with a cut-off value of 0.65 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) (Snellen 20/90) and 1.15 log MAR (Snellen 20/300), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The most valuable indicator for predicting low vision and blindness was poor 1-month BCVA after first IVI compared with favorable group.

Central retinal vein occlusion in young population: risk factors and outcomes

Objective

To evaluate the risk factors and outcomes of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in young patients (&lt; 40 years).

Methods

In this retrospective monocentric case series, we included young patients (&lt;40 years) with CRVO. Patients’ medical files were analyzed focusing on demographic characteristics, suspected risk factors, ophthalmic work-up, visual acuity (VA), treatment, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 54 eyes of 52 patients were included. Central retinal vein occlusion was considered idiopathic in 13 patients (25%). The main risk factors identified were ocular hypertension (20.4%), inflammation (20.4%), high blood pressure (14.8%), and coagulation abnormality (11.1%). Final VA was lower in patients with high blood pressure and inflammation when compared to patients with no risk factor (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Intravitreal injections were needed in 23 eyes (42.6%) and 19 eyes (35.2%) received panretinal photocoagulation treatment.

Conclusion

Central retinal vein occlusion is frequently associated with risk factors in young patients (75% of patients). In addition to the usual factors found in older patients, such as ocular hypertension and high blood pressure, coagulation abnormality and inflammation were also among the risk factors identified. Young patients with CRVO should be evaluated for the presence of risk factors and patients with high blood pressure or inflammatory findings should be followed carefully since they have a worse outcome.

Postponed care due to COVID-19 lockdown impact on visual acuity of retinal vein occlusion patients: a large cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of postponed care attributed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns on visual acuity and the number of anti-VEGF injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive RVO patients previously treated with anti-VEGF injections, which compared data from pre- (2019) and during (2020) COVID-19 lockdown period.

RESULTS

A total of 814 RVO patients with a mean age of 72.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 439 patients were assessed in 2019 and 375 in 2020. There was no significant difference between the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 period in terms of baseline and final BCVA (p = 0.7 and 0.9 respectively), but there was a significantly reduced mean number of anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 period (5.0 and. 5.9 respectively, p < 0.01), with a constant lower ratio of injections per patient. A noticeable decline was found during March-May (p < 0.01) in 2020. Baseline BCVA (0.69, p < 0.01) and the number of injections (- 0.01, p = 0.01) were predictors of final BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of RVO patients, during 2020 lockdowns imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant reduction in the annual number of anti-VEGF injections was noted. The postponed care did not result in a significant impact on the final BCVA. Baseline BCVA and the number of annual injections serve as predictors for final BCVA in RVO patients.

Clinical Features of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in Young Patients

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease. Central RVO (CRVO), in which obstruction occurs posterior to the lamina cribrosa due to various causes, manifests with extensive venous tortuosity, dilatation of blood vessels in the four quadrants, and retinal hemorrhage. The presence of macular edema decreases visual acuity in patients with CRVO, especially in elderly patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. In the last decade, treatment modalities for CRVO have improved, with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents being widely used as treatment. However, there are cases of refractory or recurrent macular edema. Moreover, CRVO also occurs in young patients. This article reviews previous studies and case reports and summarizes the differences in etiological factors, clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis between young and elderly patients. Due to the low incidence of CRVO in young patients, clinical data from these age groups are limited. Hence, further studies are warranted to explore the differences between age groups to improve individualization of treatment of young patients.

Eye disorders other than diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes

AIM

While diabetic retinopathy is the most specific complication of chronic hyperglycaemia, numerous other ocular conditions also can involve the eyes of people with diabetes. Cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, retinal vascular occlusion, and acute ischaemic optic neuropathy combine to impair vision in people with diabetes, especially when they are old. This report provides a critical analysis and an overview of the current knowledge of the main ocular disorders (excluding diabetic retinopathy) and their association in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A literature search strategy was conducted for all English-language literature with a systematic review of key references until 2021.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes have a high-to-moderate increased risk for most of the usual ocular disorders we reviewed with the exception of age-related macular degeneration. Exposure to chronic hyperglycaemia promotes the development of many eye disorders while acute glucose changes are involved in refractive disorders, diabetic papillopathy and acute cataract.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes, beyond diabetic retinopathy, increases the risk of numerous eye disorders leading to low vision with implications for daily diabetes management. Even in the absence of clearly demonstrated benefit from glucose control in all eye conditions, achieving good glycaemic control and adherence to diabetes treatment will likely help avoid an additional risk of visual impairment in people with diabetes. In perspective, interesting findings suggesting a preventive effect of metformin use on age-related macular degeneration occurrence justify further studies.