A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in the management of neovascular glaucoma: absence of consensus and variability in practice

[Glaucoma drainage devices: Indications, intraoperative management and postoperative follow-up]

Glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) are used for patients with secondary glaucoma, such as uveitic or neovascular glaucoma, which is uncontrolled under local therapy. They are also used in patients with conjunctival scarring, for example after a previous vitrectomy or after unsuccessful previous glaucoma surgery, such as trabeculectomy. They are also a treatment option for congenital glaucoma, aphakic glaucoma or for the treatment of iridocorneoendothelial syndromes. The conventional GDD were the Baerveldt, Molteno or Ahmed glaucoma implant, whereby the first two were valveless and the latter had a valve. Newer GDD include the PAUL glaucoma implant, the Ahmed Clear Path and the EyeWatch system. Hypotony is a feared complication after GDD surgery, and there are various options for avoiding it: external ligation of the tube or intraluminal suture obstruction. However, low IOP may still occur postoperatively. If early postoperative hypotension occurs in combination with a shallow anterior chamber, the injection of a viscoelastic can be helpful. Late hypotension is usually treated with permanent occlusion or removal of the tube. Furthermore, GDD erosion and migration can occur postoperatively, in such cases a surgical revision is required. Corneal decompensation can also occur after GDD; Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the treatment of choice in many centers and is performed more frequently than a penetrating keratoplasty. Finally, double vision is a possible complication after GDI. Most patients have short-term, self-limited diplopia or can be adequately treated with prism glasses; a few require strabologic surgery.

Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with/without intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in neovascular glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections in neovascular glaucoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study assessed NVG patients who underwent AGV implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections. Demographic and clinical data, including ocular findings, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and glaucoma medication count, were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at one day, one month, and one year. The study included 35 patients. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients who received anti-VEGF injections before AGV surgery. Group 2, with 12 patients, had no anti-VEGF injections prior to surgery. Successful surgery was defined as IOP values between 6 and 21mmHg. The primary outcome was a 30% or more reduction in IOP.

RESULTS

The groups displayed no significant difference in their demographic or clinical profiles (P>0.05). The visual acuity before and one year after surgery did not differ significantly between the groups. However, IOP values significantly decreased by the end of the one-year follow-up for both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding visual acuity, IOP, or the number of medications during the one-year follow-up (P>0.05). Success rates were 95.7% for Group 1 and 91.7% for Group 2. No significant difference in complications between the groups was observed (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF injections prior to AGV implantation did not significantly impact visual acuity, IOP values, or medication count during the one-year follow-up.

Does Bevacizumab Improve Outcomes After Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Refractory Glaucoma?: A Meta-Analysis

PRCIS

Mean intraocular pressure (IOP), complete and overall success, mean IOP-lowering medications, incidence of hypertensive phase, and complications were found to be comparable between patients undergoing Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (AGVI) with adjunctive bevacizumab versus AGVI alone.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to assess how adjunctive bevacizumab impacts the surgical outcomes of AGVI compared with AGVI alone in all subtypes of refractory glaucoma.

METHODS

A systematic search of databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in March 2023. Primary outcomes included mean IOP and success rates. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP-lowering medications, incidence of hypertensive phase, and complications. Qualitative assessment, meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 203 eyes were included in the quantitative analysis. Initial meta-analysis showed a strong yet nonsignificant trend (all P > 0.05) favoring adjunctive bevacizumab in all outcomes of interest. Significant heterogeneity was observed for mean IOP and success outcomes at all time points (all I2 > 50%). Subgroup analysis of the administration route revealed a reduced incidence of hyphaema in the intravitreal bevacizumab subgroup (odds ratio: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.59; P = 0.01) with significant heterogeneity persisting in the intravitreal bevacizumab subgroup for all measures (all I2 > 50%). Post hoc sensitivity analysis of studies without concurrent pan-retinal photocoagulation for mean IOP and success outcomes demonstrated more conservative effect sizes with a corresponding decrease in heterogeneity for all measures (all I2 < 30%).

CONCLUSION

Published studies investigating the role of adjunctive bevacizumab show a strong trend to improve outcomes but contain a relatively small number of participants. This analysis underpins the need for an adequately powered RCT to explore the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in AGVI surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma Secondary to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Japanese Patients without the Use of Glaucoma Drainage Devices

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate outcomes of visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR)-associated neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in Japanese patients treated with surgical therapies without the use of glaucoma drainage devices. Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for 31 consecutive PDR-associated NVG patients who underwent surgical treatments in our institution between 2013 and 2022. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, VA, and IOP were recorded at the first and last visits, and surgical procedures, including pars plana vitrectomy with extensive panretinal and ciliary photocoagulation (PPV-PRCP), diode laser trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation (DCPC), and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (TLE-MMC), with or without a prior intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection, were reviewed. Results: Of the thirty-one PDR patients with NVG, two patients received PPV-PRCP or DCPC alone (6.5%), respectively, three patients received TLE-MMC alone (9.7%), two patients received TLE-MMC after IVB (6.5%), six patients received PPV-PRCP and TLE-MMC (19.4%), seven patients received PPV-PRCP and TLE-MMC after IVB (22.6%), five patients received PPV-PRCP and DCPC and TLE-MMC (16.1%), and four patients received PPV-PRCP and DCPC and TLE-MMC after IVB (12.9%). The VA of two patients (6.5%) deteriorated to no light perception. In all patients, the mean logMAR VA was 1.28 ± 1.05 at the first visit and remained at 1.26 ± 1.08 at the last visit, with no significant change; the mean IOP was 33.0 ± 15.2 mmHg at the initial visit and decreased significantly to 14.0 ± 7.4 mmHg at the last visit. The number of eyes with IOP ≥ 21 decreased from twenty-eight (90.3%) to three (9.7%). Although IOP in patients with IOP > 30 mmHg at the initial visit reduced to a level comparable to that of patients with IOP ≤ 30 mmHg, the IOP > 30 mmHg group received IVB more frequently and had significantly higher logMAR VA at the last visit compared to the IOP ≤ 30 mmHg group. Hypotony (<6 mmHg) was observed in four eyes (12.9%). Conclusions: In PDR patients with NVG, various combinations of PPV-PRCP, DCPC, and TLE-MMC after adjunctive IVB without the use of glaucoma drainage devices lowered IOP sufficiently; for these patients, neovascular regression was observed, with no further deterioration of VA. However, surgical procedures should be performed for PDR patients with NVG before visual impairment occurs. On the other hand, approximately less than 15% of patients developed blindness or low IOP.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN and Chinese databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Periodical Database (Wanfang Database), VIP Journal Integration Platform and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to 5 September 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment of NVG using different anti-VEGF agents combined with various methods of drug administration, without any language limitations. All patients included underwent panretinal laser photocoagulation and there were no restrictions on prior glaucoma surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety and rank priority of anti-VEGF regimens. The source of heterogeneity and the related factors affecting the stability of the results were also explored. CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 17 RCTs involving a total of 1311 eyes from 1228 patients. We examined five different treatment regimens, which used three different anti-VEGF drugs. The following treatments showed a significant decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the control group at 1 month after glaucoma surgery: simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of conbercept (ICCIVC) (mean difference (MD)=-11.56, 95% credible interval (CrI) -20.8 to -2.24), intravitreal injection of conbercept (MD=-8.88, 95% CrI -13.93 to -3.78), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (MD=-7.62, 95% CrI -10.91 to -4.33) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab IVB) (MD=-5.51, 95% CrI -10.79 to -0.35). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ICCIVC (82.0%) may be the most effective regimen in reducing IOP. In terms of safety, there were no statistically significant differences among the interventions. According to the SUCRA analysis, ICCIVC (68.0%) was considered the safest choice with the fewest complications. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that mean age was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the study results.

CONCLUSION

ICCIVC was more effective and safer than other anti-VEGF regimens for NVG. Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection was found to be the best route of administration, and conbercept was found to be the superior drug selection when compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022309676.

Trabeculectomy with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

Patients with NVG who underwent trabeculectomy with concurrent IVB (group 1) and those who underwent IVB sequentially, followed by trabeculectomy with MMC (group 2) in 1-2 weeks between January 2021 and August 2022, were included in this retrospective hospital-based study. The need for medications for intraocular pressure (IOP) control at 6 months in the two groups was the primary outcome measured and compared between the groups. The association of the need for medications postoperatively with clinical variables was assessed using stepwise multivariate regression statistics.

RESULTS

We finally included 40 patients ( n = 12 in group 1, n = 28 in group 2) with no significant differences in presenting age between groups. The IOP at 1 day and 1 week were not significantly different between groups though the IOP at 1, 3, and 6 months. IOP was lower in group 1 eyes with the 6-month IOP, being significantly lower in group 1, P = 0.05. Three eyes in group 1 and 11 eyes in group 2 required anti-glaucoma medications in the postoperative period. Multivariate regression identified preoperative IVB >3 (β =0.7, P < 0.001) and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (β = 0.7, P = 0.004) as prognostic factors ( R2 = 40.6%) determining the need for anti-glaucoma medication (AGM) postoperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent IVB with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C is a feasible alternative in patients with NVG with refractory high-presenting IOP. This may serve to address raised IOP as well as retinal ischemia, thereby improving surgical success rates in the most challenging NVG cases.

Benefits of a combined surgical technique for patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of the proposed surgical technique for treating secondary neovascular glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: We examined 28 eyes of 28 patients (16 women and 12 men), aged 46}7,2 years, with secondary neovascular glaucoma. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination before and during treatment. Two-stage treatment was applied to all patients. At the first stage - performed an advanced technique of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy while administering anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) intravitreal or intracameral injections. At the second - we performed externalization of Schlemm's canal followed by YAG laser trabeculectomy. Statistical analysis of the results was used the SPSS v. 11.0, MedStat v.15.1 software package for medical and biological research.

RESULTS

Results: The proposed surgical technique, leads to a gradual decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) and regression of the iris and anterior chamber angle neovascularization. The postoperative course was uneventful for all the patients. In the early postoperative period, the IOP was observed to be normalized in all the eyes. The IOP ranged from 12 to 16 mm Hg. The neovascularization regression occurred (in 100 % of cases) within 5-7 days.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Gradual reduction of IOP reduces intraoperative complications. Intravitreal or intracameral injections of anti-proliferative agents contribute to the regression of neovascularization and further gradual reduction of IOP. Performing a laser trabeculectomy in the area where a non-penetrating deep sclerectomy was previously performed creates new pathways for the outflow of intraocular fluid from the anterior chamber and reduces the risks of reintervention.

Clinical Efficacy of Preoperative and Intraoperative Intravitreal Ranibizumab as Adjuvant Therapy of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Combined with Vitrectomy in the Management of Neovascular Glaucoma with Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a devastating ocular disease with poor prognosis. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) has been used as adjuvant therapy of surgical interventions preoperatively or intraoperatively. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combined IVR as adjuvant therapy in treating NVG with vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in PDR. A total of 39 NVG patients with VH (39 eyes) received IVR 3 to 5 days before surgery, and then they were assigned to either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) + Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation (Group 1, n = 22) or PPV + AGV implantation + intraoperative IVR (Group 2, n = 17). Patients were followed up for at least 9 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP), anti-glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical success rates and postoperative complications were compared. Results showed that IOP decreased promptly after surgery and was notably maintained at a mid-term follow-up in both groups, and no significant differences were observed (all p > 0.05). Additional intraoperative IVR significantly reduced postoperative recurrent VH and iris neovascularization (p = 0.047, p = 0.025, respectively). There was no remarkable difference in postoperative anti-glaucoma medications, BCVA and complications between two groups (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, preoperative and intraoperative IVR as adjuvant therapy of AGV implantation combined with PPV could be a safe and effective treatment for NVG with VH in PDR. An additional intraoperative anti-VEGF injection could significantly reduce postoperative VH and iris neovascularization.

[Neovascular Glaucomas - Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis]

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severe potentially blinding disease, which represents one of the most common types of secondary glaucomas. The majority of cases are caused by ischemic retinal conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion or ocular ischemic syndrome. If appropriately diagnosed and treated, ideally the development of NVG can be prevented. Since treatment gets increasingly challenging as the disease progresses, early diagnosis is of utmost importance. In this review pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis are discussed extensively. A focus is put on the consecutive stages through which the disease progresses and how to diagnose and differentiate them. Ultimately a stage adapted therapy approach is detailed, consisting of the three blocks: 1. treatment of the underlying disease/retinal ischemia, 2. adjunctive medical therapy (anti-VEGF) and 3. therapy of the elevated intraocular pressure.

Update on Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion represents the second leading cause of retinal vascular disorders, with a uniform sex distribution worldwide. A thorough evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors is required to correct possible comorbidities. The diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion have changed tremendously in the last 30 years, but the assessment of retinal ischemia at baseline and during follow-up examinations remains crucial. New imaging techniques have shed light on the pathophysiology of the disease and laser treatment, once the only therapeutic option, is now only one of the possible approaches with antivascular endothelial growth factors and steroid injections being preferred in most cases. Nowadays long-term outcomes are better than those achievable 20 years ago and yet, many new therapeutic options are under development, including new intravitreal drugs and gene therapy. Despite this, some cases still develop sight-threatening complications deserving a more aggressive (sometimes surgical) approach. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to reappraise some old but still valid concepts and to integrate them with new research and clinical data. The work will provide an overview of the disease's pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical features along with a detailed discussion on the advantages of multimodal imaging and of the different treatment strategies with the aim of providing retina specialists with the most updated knowledge in the field.