No effect of twitchin phosphorylation on the rate of myosin head detachment in molluscan catch muscle: are myosin heads involved in the catch state?

Neural Control of Dynamic 3-Dimensional Skin Papillae for Cuttlefish Camouflage

The color and pattern changing abilities of octopus, squid, and cuttlefish via chromatophore neuromuscular organs are unparalleled. Cuttlefish and octopuses also have a unique muscular hydrostat system in their skin. When this system is expressed, dermal bumps called papillae disrupt body shape and imitate the fine texture of surrounding objects, yet the control system is unknown. Here we report for papillae: (1) the motoneurons and the neurotransmitters that control activation and relaxation, (2) a physiologically fast expression and retraction system, and (3) a complex of smooth and striated muscles that enables long-term expression of papillae through sustained tension in the absence of neural input. The neural circuits controlling acute shape-shifting skin papillae in cuttlefish show homology to the iridescence circuits in squids. The sustained tension in papillary muscles for long-term camouflage utilizes muscle heterogeneity and points toward the existence of a "catch-like" mechanism that would reduce the necessary energy expenditure.

Myosin loop 2 is involved in the formation of a trimeric complex of twitchin, actin, and myosin

Molluscan smooth muscles exhibit a low energy cost contraction called catch. Catch is regulated by twitchin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Recently, we found that the D2 fragment of twitchin containing the D2 site (Ser-4316) and flanking immunoglobulin motifs (TWD2-S) formed a heterotrimeric complex with myosin and with actin in the region that interacts with myosin loop 2 (Funabara, D., Hamamoto, C., Yamamoto, K., Inoue, A., Ueda, M., Osawa, R., Kanoh, S., Hartshorne, D. J., Suzuki, S., and Watabe, S. (2007) J. Exp. Biol. 210, 4399-4410). Here, we show that TWD2-S interacts directly with myosin loop 2 in a phosphorylation-sensitive manner. A synthesized peptide, CAQNKEAETTGTHKKRKSSA, based on the myosin loop 2 sequence (loop 2 peptide), competitively inhibited the formation of the trimeric complex. Isothermal titration calorimetry showed that TWD2-S binds to the loop 2 peptide with a K(a) of (2.44 +/- 0.09) x 10(5) m(-1) with two binding sites. The twitchin-binding peptide of actin, AGFAGDDAP, which also inhibited formation of the trimeric complex, bound to TWD2-S with a K(a) of (5.83 +/- 0.05) x 10(4) m(-1) with two binding sites. The affinity of TWD2-S to actin and myosin was slightly decreased with an increase of pH, but this effect could not account for the marked pH dependence of catch in permeabilized fibers. The complex formation also showed a moderate Ca(2+) sensitivity in that in the presence of Ca(2+) complex formation was reduced.

Molecular basis of the catch state in molluscan smooth muscles: a catchy challenge

The catch state (or 'catch') of molluscan smooth muscles is a passive holding state that occurs after cessation of stimulation. During catch, force and, in particular, resistance to stretch are maintained for long time periods with low (or no) energy consumption at basal intracellular free [Ca2+]. The catch state is initiated by Ca2+-stimulated dephosphorylation of the titin-like protein twitchin and is inhibited by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of twitchin. In addition, catch is pH sensitive, but the reason for this is unknown. According to a traditional model, catch is due to slower cross-bridge cycles where myosin heads remain longer attached to the actin filaments after force generation, possibly caused by a hindered release of ADP from the myosin heads. However, this model was disproved by recent findings which showed that (i) inhibitors of myosin function, such as vanadate, do not affect catch force; (ii) factors which terminate the catch state do not accelerate myosin head detachment kinetics and (iii) a catch-like high resistance to stretch is still inducible when force development is prevented. Thus, catch probably involves passive linkage structures interconnecting the myofilaments (catch linkages). For example twitchin could (i) tie myosin heads to the thin filaments, (ii) mechanically lock them in a stretch resistant state or (iii) interconnect thick and thin filaments directly. However, it is questionable if these mechanisms are sufficient since twitchin seems to be about 15-times less abundant than myosin. Therefore, in addition, interconnections between thick filaments could exist, which could involve e.g. paramyosin or twitchin. Catch could even involve changes in the compliance of thick filaments. The function of myorod, found specifically in catch muscles in equal abundance with myosin, is not known. The suggestion is made here that catch linkages are present already during active contraction either as ratchet-like elements resisting stretch and not opposing shortening or in some kind of 'standby' mode ready to transform suddenly into the working mode by stretches or after Ca2+ removal following cessation of stimulation.

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

Small-angle X-ray diffraction studies of a molluscan smooth muscle in the catch state

Small-angle X-ray diffraction patterns from the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis in the resting, active, and catch states were examined closely to elucidate the structural features of catch. The specimens were isometrically contracted by stimulation with acetylcholine. The specimens that produced strong tensions in both the active and catch states showed noticeable structural change in the thick filaments. Although the tension was weaker in the catch state than in the active state, the axial spacings of the 14.5 nm meridional reflection and its higher order reflections from the thick filaments were more elongated in the catch state than in the active state. This means that the thick filaments were stretched more strongly in the catch state than in the active state.

Unphosphorylated twitchin forms a complex with actin and myosin that may contribute to tension maintenance in catch

Molluscan smooth muscle can maintain tension over extended periods with little energy expenditure, a process termed catch. Catch is thought to be regulated by phosphorylation of a thick filament protein, twitchin, and involves two phosphorylation sites, D1 and D2, close to the N and C termini, respectively. This study was initiated to investigate the role of the D2 site and its phosphorylation in the catch mechanism. A peptide was constructed containing the D2 site and flanking immunoglobulin (Ig) motifs. It was shown that the dephosphorylated peptide, but not the phosphorylated form, bound to both actin and myosin. The binding site on actin was within the sequence L10 to P29. This region also binds to loop 2 of the myosin head. The dephosphorylated peptide linked myosin and F-actin and formed a trimeric complex. Electron microscopy revealed that twitchin is distributed on the surface of the thick filament with an axial periodicity of 36.25 nm and it is suggested that the D2 site aligns with the myosin heads. It is proposed that the complex formed with the dephosphorylated D2 site of twitchin, F-actin and myosin represents a component of the mechanical linkage in catch.

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan muscles: evidence that twitchin interacts with myosin, myorod, and paramyosin core and affects properties of actomyosin

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan smooth muscles postulates in vivo existence of twitchin links between thin and thick filaments that arise in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [N.S. Shelud'ko, G.G. Matusovskaya, T.V. Permyakova, O.S. Matusovsky, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 432 (2004) 269-277]. In this paper, we proposed a scheme for a possible catch mechanism involving twitchin links and regulated thin filaments. The experimental evidence in support of the scheme is provided. It was found that twitchin can interact not only with mussel myosin and rabbit F-actin but also with the paramyosin core of thick filaments, myorod, mussel thin filaments, "natural" F-actin from mussel, and skeletal myosin from rabbit. No difference was revealed in binding of twitchin with mussel and rabbit myosin. The capability of twitchin to interact with all thick filament proteins suggests that putative twitchin links can be attached to any site of thick filaments. Addition of twitchin to a mixture of actin and paramyosin filaments, or to a mixture of Ca(2+)-regulated actin and myosin filaments under relaxing conditions caused in both cases similar changes in the optical properties of suspensions, indicating an interaction and aggregation of the filaments. The interaction of actin and myosin filaments in the presence of twitchin under relaxing conditions was not accompanied by an appreciable increase in the MgATPase activity. We suggest that in both cases aggregation of filaments was caused by formation of twitchin links between the filaments. We also demonstrate that native thin filaments from the catch muscle of the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus are Ca(2+)-regulated. Twitchin inhibits the ability of thin filaments to activate myosin MgATPase in the presence of Ca(2+). We suggest that twitchin inhibition of the actin-myosin interaction is due to twitchin-induced switching of the thin filaments to the inactive state.

Myosin cross-bridge kinetics and the mechanism of catch

Catch force in molluscan smooth muscle requires little, if any, energy input and is controlled by the phosphorylation state of the thick filament-associated mini-titin, twitchin. The kinetic parameters of myosin cross-bridge turnover in permeabilized catch muscle, and how they are potentially modified by the catch mechanism, were determined by single turnover measurements on myosin-bound ADP. Under isometric conditions, there are fast and slow components of cross-bridge turnover that probably result from kinetic separation of calcium-bound and calcium-free cross-bridge pools. The structure responsible for catch force maintenance at intermediate [Ca+2] does not alter the processes responsible for the fast and slow components under isometric conditions. Also, there is no measurable turnover of myosin-bound ADP during relaxation of catch force by phosphorylation of twitchin at pCa > 8. The only effects of the catch link on myosin-bound ADP turnover are 1), a small, very slow extra turnover when catch force is maintained at very low [Ca+2] (pCa > 8); and 2), attenuation of the shortening-induced increase in turnover at subsaturating [Ca(+2)]. These limited interactions between the catch link and myosin cross-bridge turnover are consistent with the idea that catch force is maintained by a thick and thin filament linkage other than the myosin cross-bridge.

The catch state of mollusc catch muscle is established during activation: experiments on skinned fibre preparations of the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis L. using the myosin inhibitors orthovanadate and blebbistatin

Catch is a holding state of muscle where tension is maintained passively for long time periods in the absence of stimulation. The catch state becomes obvious after termination of activation; however, it is possible that catch linkages are already established during activation. To investigate this, skinned fibre bundles of the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis were maximally activated with Ca(2+) and subsequently exposed to 10 mmol l(-1) orthovanadate (V(i)) or 5 mumol l(-1) blebbistatin to inhibit the force-generating myosin head cross-bridges. Repetitive stretches of about 0.1% fibre bundle length were applied to measure stiffness. Inhibitor application depressed force substantially but never resulted in a full relaxation. The remaining force was further decreased by moderate alkalization (change of pH from 6.7 to 7.4) or by cAMP. Furthermore, the stiffness/force ratio was higher during exposure to V(i) or blebbistatin than during partial Ca(2+) activation producing the same submaximal force. The increased stiffness/force ratio was abolished by moderate alkalization or cAMP. Finally, the stretch-induced delayed force increase (stretch activation) disappeared, and the force recovery following a quick release of the fibre length, was substantially reduced when the force was depressed by V(i) or blebbistatin. All these findings suggest that catch linkages are already established during maximal Ca(2+) activation. They seem to exhibit ratchet properties because they allow shortening and resist stretches. In isometric experiments a force decrease is needed to stress the catch linkages in the high resistance direction so that they contribute to force.

Effect of pH on the rate of myosin head detachment in molluscan catch muscle: are myosin heads involved in the catch state?

Moderate alkalisation is known to terminate the catch state of bivalve mollusc smooth muscles such as the anterior byssus retractor muscle (ABRM) of Mytilus edulis L. In the present study, we investigated the effect of moderate alkalisation (pH 7.2-7.7 vs control pH 6.7) on the myosin head detachment rate in saponin-skinned fibre bundles of ABRM in order to investigate the possible role of myosin heads in the force maintenance during catch. The detachment rate of myosin heads was deduced from two types of experiments. (1) In stretch experiments on maximally Ca2+-activated fibre bundles (pCa 4.5), the rate of force decay after stepwise stretch was assessed. (2) In ATP step experiments, the rate of force decay from high force rigor (pCa>8) was evaluated. The ATP step was induced by photolysis of caged ATP. We found that moderate alkalisation induces relaxation of skinned fibres in catch, thereby reducing both force and stiffness, whereas it does not accelerate the rate of myosin head detachment. This acceleration, however, would be expected if catch would be simply due to myosin heads remaining sustainably attached to actin filaments. Thus, the myosin heads may be less involved in catch than generally assumed. Catch may possibly depend on a different kind of myofilament interconnections, which are abolished by moderate alkalisation.

Catch force links and the low to high force transition of myosin

Catch is characterized by maintenance of force with very low energy utilization in some invertebrate muscles. Catch is regulated by phosphorylation of the mini-titin, twitchin, and a catch component of force exists at all [Ca2+] except those resulting in maximum force. The mechanism responsible for catch force was characterized by determining how the effects of agents that inhibit the low to high force transition of the myosin cross-bridge (inorganic phosphate, butanedione monoxime, trifluoperazine, and blebbistatin) are modified by twitchin phosphorylation and [Ca2+]. In permeabilized anterior byssus retractor muscles from Mytilus edulis, catch force was identified as being sensitive to twitchin phosphorylation, whereas noncatch force was insensitive. In all cases, inhibition of the low to high force transition caused an increase in catch force. The same relationship exists between catch force and noncatch force whether force is varied by changes in [Ca2+] and/or agents that inhibit cross-bridge force production. This suggests that myosin in the high force state detaches catch force maintaining structures, whereas myosin in the low force state promotes their formation. It is unlikely that the catch structure is the myosin cross-bridge; rather, it appears that myosin interacts with the structure, most likely twitchin, and regulates its attachment and detachment.