Severe weight loss during preoperative chemoradiotherapy compromises survival outcome for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Post-diagnosis adiposity and colorectal cancer prognosis: A Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis

The adiposity influence on colorectal cancer prognosis remains poorly characterised. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on post-diagnosis adiposity measures (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, weight) or their changes and colorectal cancer outcomes. PubMed and Embase were searched through 28 February 2022. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least three studies had sufficient information. The quality of evidence was interpreted and graded by the Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) independent Expert Committee on Cancer Survivorship and Expert Panel. We reviewed 124 observational studies (85 publications). Meta-analyses were possible for BMI and all-cause mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, and cancer recurrence/disease-free survival. Non-linear meta-analysis indicated a reverse J-shaped association between BMI and colorectal cancer outcomes (nadir at BMI 28 kg/m2). The highest risk, relative to the nadir, was observed at both ends of the BMI distribution (18 and 38 kg/m2), namely 60% and 23% higher risk for all-cause mortality; 95% and 26% for colorectal cancer-specific mortality; and 37% and 24% for cancer recurrence/disease-free survival, respectively. The higher risk with low BMI was attenuated in secondary analyses of RCTs (compared to cohort studies), among studies with longer follow-up, and in women suggesting potential methodological limitations and/or altered physiological state. Descriptively synthesised studies on other adiposity-outcome associations of interest were limited in number and methodological quality. All the associations were graded as limited (likelihood of causality: no conclusion) due to potential methodological limitations (reverse causation, confounding, selection bias). Additional well-designed observational studies and interventional trials are needed to provide further clarification.

Evaluation of different screening tools as the first step of the GLIM framework: A cross-sectional study of Chinese cancer patients in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory cancer patients are at high risk of malnutrition. Multiple nutrition screening and assessment tools are used in the outpatient setting. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different nutrition screening tools as the first step of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework in Chinese ambulatory cancer patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in China. Malnutrition diagnoses made by the GLIM framework using Malnutrition Screening Tool, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, or short-form of Patient-Gernerated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as the first step were compared with PG-SGA separately.

RESULTS

Of the 562 included patients, 31.0% were diagnosed with malnutrition (PG-SGA: B + C), and 12.6% were diagnosed with severe malnutrition (PG-SGA: C). As the screening tool in the first step of the GLIM framework, the short form of PG-SGA (PG-SGA SF) with a cutoff value of ≥2 performed best in diagnosing malnutrition, with good sensitivity (SE) (80.5% [73.6-85.9]) and specificity (SP) (98.4% [96.5-99.4]) and substantial accordance (κ = 0.826), whereas PG-SGA SF with a cutoff value of ≥4 performed best in diagnosing severe malnutrition, with fair SE (62.0% [49.6-73.0]), good SP (96.7% [94.6-98.1]) and moderate accordance (κ = 0.629).

CONCLUSION

Using PG-SGA as the standard, the GLIM framework using PG-SGA SF as the screening tool has good accordance with the PG-SGA regardless of severity grading. PG-SGA SF can be used as a valid screening tool in the GLIM framework.

Construction of individualised care programmes for patients with pancreatic cancer with postoperative weight-loss control based on the Delphi method: a cross-sectional study in China

BACKGROUND

At present, clinical nutritional care for patients with pancreatic cancer focuses more on the observation of the effect of enteral parenteral nutrition, and there is a lack of personalised care plans for weight-loss control. We used the Delphi method to construct a set of personalised nursing programmes to effectively control the rate of postoperative weight loss in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional investigation. Through literature analysis, literature review and data review, a personalised nursing plan for the postoperative weight-loss control in patients with pancreatic cancer was preliminarily developed. From October to December 2022, the Delphi method was adopted to conduct two questionnaires for 32 experts working in fields related to pancreatic diseases in Grade-A tertiary hospitals from four different departments. After statistical processing, the personalised nursing plan was determined according to the perceived level of importance, coefficient of variation, full score rate and recognition rate of the indicators.

RESULTS

The recovery rates of the two rounds of consultation were 93.75% and 100%, respectively, and the overall authority coefficient of the experts was 0.918, which represented 'authoritative'. In terms of importance, the coefficient of variation was 0-0.137; in terms of feasibility, the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.09 to 0.194. Finally, a scheme consisting of 36 entries in 8 dimensions was built. This programme is comprehensive in content, meets the nutritional diagnosis and treatment needs of patients in the stage of postoperative rehabilitation, provides relatively comprehensive nutritional assessment and support and has a robust system and feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The individualised nursing plan for patients with pancreatic cancer with postoperative weight-loss control based on the Delphi method is highly scientific and reliable and has positive significance.

Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review

BACKGROUNDS & AIMS

The nutritional evaluation of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients lacks a gold standard or scientific consensus, we aimed to summarize and systematically evaluate the prognostic value of nutritional screening and assessment tools used for PC patients.

METHODS

Relevant studies were retrieved from major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and searched from January 2010 to December 2023. We performed meta-analyses with STATA 14.0 when three or more studies used the same tool.

RESULTS

This analysis included 27 articles involving 6,060 PC patients. According to a meta-analysis of these studies, poor nutritional status evaluated using five nutritional screening tools Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Controlling Nutritional Status Score (CONUT), Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS2002) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) was associated with all-cause mortality in PC patients. But Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) did not. Of all tools analyzed, CONUT had the maximum HR for mortality (HR = 1.978, 95%CI 1.345-2.907, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

All-cause mortality in PC patients was predicted by poor nutritional status. CONUT may be the best nutritional assessment tool for PC patients. The clinical application value of Short Form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Generated Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Patient-generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in PC patients need to be confirmed. In order to improve patients' nutritional status and promote their recovery, nutritional screening tools can be used.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (number CRD42022376715).

Nutritional status and symptom burden in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the dietetic assessment and intervention in lung cancer (DAIL) trial

INTRODUCTION

European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism guidelines recommend that patients with cancer should be screened for malnutrition at diagnosis. The dietetic assessment and intervention in lung cancer study investigated the nutritional status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the need for dietetic intervention.

METHODS

In this observational cohort pilot study, patients with stage 3b and 4 NSCLC were assessed prior to starting first line systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) with a range of measurements and questionnaires. We report the outcomes related to the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment tool (PG-SGA), RESULTS: 96 patients were consented between April 2017 and August 2019. The PG-SGA identified that 78% of patients required specialist nutritional advice; with 52% patients having a critical need for dietetic input and symptom management. Results were dominated by symptom scores. As a screening test, one or more symptoms or recent weight loss history had a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI 78.44% to 94.36%) and specificity of 95.24% (95% CI 76.18% to 99.88%) for need for dietetic intervention.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with NSCLC have a high symptom burden and are at risk of malnutrition prior to starting SACT and would benefit from dietetic review. It is imperative that oncologists and healthcare professionals discuss weight loss history and symptoms with lung cancer patients to correct nutritional deficiencies and resolve symptoms prior to starting treatment.

Total energy expenditure assessed by 24-h whole-room indirect calorimeter in patients with colorectal cancer: baseline findings from the PRIMe study

BACKGROUND

Total energy expenditure (TEE) determines energy requirements, but objective data in patients with cancer are limited.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize TEE, investigate its predictors, and compare TEE with cancer-specific predicted energy requirements.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analysis included patients with stages II-IV colorectal cancer from the Protein Recommendation to Increase Muscle (PRIMe) trial. TEE was assessed by 24-h stay in a whole-room indirect calorimeter before dietary intervention and compared with cancer-specific predicted energy requirements (25-30 kcal/kg). Generalized linear models, paired-samples t tests, and Pearson correlation were applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (56 ± 10 y; body mass index [BMI]: 27.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2; 68% male) were included. Absolute TEE was higher in males (mean difference: 391 kcal/d; 95% CI: 167, 616 kcal/d; P < 0.001), patients with colon cancer (mean difference: 279 kcal/d; 95% CI: 73, 485 kcal/d; P = 0.010), and patients with obesity (mean difference: 393 kcal/d; 95% CI: 182, 604 kcal/d; P < 0.001). Appendicular lean soft tissue (β: 46.72; 95% CI: 34.27, 59.17; P < 0.001) and tumor location (colon-β: 139.69; 95% CI: 19.44, 259.95; P = 0.023) independently predicted TEE when adjusted for sex. Error between measured TEE and energy requirements predicted by 25 kcal/kg (mean difference: 241 kcal/d; 95% CI: 76, 405 kcal/d; P = 0.010) or 30 kcal/kg (mean difference: 367 kcal/d; 95% CI: 163, 571 kcal/d; P < 0.001) was higher for patients with obesity, and proportional error was observed (25 kcal/kg: r = -0.587; P < 0.001; and 30 kcal/kg: r = -0.751; P < 0.001). TEE (mean difference: 25 kcal/kg; 95% CI: 24, 27 kcal/kg) was below predicted requirements using 30 kcal/kg (-430 ± 322 kcal/d; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to assess TEE of patients with cancer using whole-room indirect calorimeter and highlights the need for improved assessment of energy requirements in this population. Energy requirements predicted using 30 kcal/kg overestimated TEE by 1.44 times in a controlled sedentary environment and TEE was outside of the predicted requirement range for most. Special considerations are warranted when determining TEE of patients with colorectal cancer, such as BMI, body composition, and tumor location. This is a baseline cross-sectional analysis from a clinical trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02788955 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02788955).

Prediction of survival of preoperative colorectal patients: A new tool to assess the interaction of nutritional status and inflammation

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the application of a new nutritional status and inflammatory tool to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with CRC in the preoperative period.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study with CRC patients of both sexes treated at a hospital unit, aged ≥20 years. Data were extracted between 2007 and 2015. Multivariate Cox's models were employed to predict OS utilizing a new grade classification system (body mass index vs. percentage weight loss - BMI/%WL), inflammatory markers and clinical data.

RESULTS

We evaluated 361 patients. BMI/%WL grade 3-4 (HR: 2.01; p = 0.001; 95% CI: 1.34-3.02) were independent predictors of poor OS. Moreover, BMI/%WL grade 3-4 + neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥2.4 (HR: 2.79; p = 0.001; 95% CI: 1.54-5.03) increased the death risk in 5-years. However, low NLR (<2.4) altered the OS prognostic ability of the BMI/%WL (HR: 1.72; p = 0.099; 95% CI: 0.90-3.28).

CONCLUSION

BMI/%WL was independent predictors of poor OS and the interaction with NLR produced an adjustment effect. These associated tools may be useful in the clinical management of preoperative patients with CRC.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy on the Functional Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the functional outcome of patients with resectable rectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on anorectal function (ARF), urinary function and sexual function in relevant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. All English-language studies, published from January 2000 to July 2021, that explored the (postoperative) effects of neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery on ARF, urinary function and sexual function of patients were included (PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021281617).

RESULTS

The data in this study were derived from 37 articles based on 33 studies; in total, 17 917 patients were enrolled. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of anorectal dysfunction in the neoadjuvant therapy group was significantly higher than that in the group of upfront surgery, which was manifested by a higher incidence of major low anterior resection syndrome (odds ratio = 3.09, 95% confidence interval = 2.48, 3.84; P < 0.001), reduction of mean squeeze pressure and mean resting pressure, and other manifestations, including clustering of stools, incontinence, urgency and use of pads. With the extension of follow-up time, the adverse effects of neoadjuvant therapy on major low anterior resection syndrome existed. Compared with patients undergoing upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy increased the risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio = 1.31, 95% confidence interval = 1.00, 1.72; P = 0.05) and erectile dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval = 1.27, 2.45; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy is not only associated with impairment of ARF, but also with increased incidence of urinary incontinence and male erectile dysfunction. However, the influence of confounding factors (e.g. surgical method, tumour stage) needs to be considered.

Body mass index-based predictions and personalized clinical strategies for colorectal cancer in the context of PPPM

Currently colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide. Body mass index (BMI) is frequently used in CRC screening and risk assessment to quantitatively evaluate weight. However, the impact of BMI on clinical strategies for CRC has received little attention. Within the framework of the predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (3PM/PPPM), we hypothesized that BMI stratification would affect the primary, secondary, and tertiary care options for CRC and we conducted a critical evidence-based review. BMI dynamically influences CRC outcomes, which helps avoiding adverse treatment effects. The outcome of surgical and radiation treatment is adversely affected by overweight (BMI ≥ 30) or underweight (BMI < 20). A number of interventions, such as enhanced recovery after surgery and robotic surgery, can be applied to CRC at all levels of BMI. BMI-controlling modalities such as exercise, diet control, nutritional therapy, and medications may be potentially beneficial for patients with CRC. Patients with overweight are advised to lose weight through diet, medication, and physical activity while patients suffering of underweight require more focus on nutrition. BMI assists patients with CRC in better managing their weight, which decreases the incidence of adverse prognostic events during treatment. BMI is accessible, noninvasive, and highly predictive of clinical outcomes in CRC. The cost-benefit of the PPPM paradigm in developing countries can be advanced, and the clinical benefit for patients can be improved with the promotion of BMI-based clinical strategy models for CRC.

The Impact of Weight Loss during Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: Real-World Results

Weight loss is a common phenomenon presented in unresectable esophageal cancer (EC) patients during their definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) treatment course. This study explored the prognostic value of weight changes during dCRT in unresectable EC patients. From 2009 to 2017, 69 cT4b thoracic EC patients undergoing complete curative dCRT without baseline malnutrition were included. Clinical factors were analyzed via the Cox proportional hazards model and survival was analyzed by the Kaplan−Meier method. During dCRT, the median weight loss percentage was 5.51% (IQR = 2.77−8.85%), and the lowest body weight was reached at 35 days (IQR = 23−43 days). Median OS of these patients was 13.5 months. Both univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that weight loss ≤ 4% during dCRT was significantly associated with superior OS with a hazard ratio of 2.61 (95% CI: 1.40−4.85, p = 0.002). The median OS for patients with weight loss ≤ 4% and >4% during dCRT was 59.6 months and 9.7 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Our study demonstrated that weight loss ≤ 4% during dCRT course is a favorable prognostic factor for cT4b EC patients. This index could serve as a nutrition support reference for unresectable EC patients receiving dCRT in the future.

A Prognostic Nomogram for T3N0 Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision to Help Select Patients for Adjuvant Therapy

Background

The recurrence rate of T3N0 rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision (TME) is relatively low, meaning that not all patients need adjuvant therapy (AT) (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pT3N0M0 rectal cancer after TME were analyzed using the SEER database, of which 4367 did not receive AT and 2794 received AT. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two groups in terms of confounding factors. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to screen independent prognostic factors, which were then used to establish a nomogram. The patients were then divided into three groups with X-tile software according to their risk scores. We enrolled 334 patients as external validation.

Results

The C-index of the model was 0.725 (95% confidence interval: 0.694–0.756). We divided the patients into three different risk layers based on the nomogram prediction scores, and found that AT did not improve the prognosis of low- and moderate-risk patients, while high-risk patients benefited from AT. External validation data also support the above conclusions.

Conclusion

This study developed a nomogram that effectively and comprehensively evaluates the prognosis of T3N0 rectal cancer patients after TME. After using the nomogram, we recommend AT for high-risk patients, but not for low- and moderate-risk patients.

Body Composition Measurement Improved Performance of GLIM Criteria in Diagnosing Malnutrition Compared to PG-SGA in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background and aims: Muscle mass reduction (MMR) is one of the three etiologic criteria in the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework. This study aimed to evaluate the value of MMR in GLIM criteria among ambulatory cancer patients. Methods: A single-center prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. All participants underwent calf circumference (CC) measurement and body composition measurement by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). MMR was identified by CC, fat-free mass index (FFMI), appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI), or combinations of the above three indicators. Patients-generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) was used as the comparator. Results: A total of 562 cancer patients receiving intravenous treatment were evaluated. Of the participants, 62.8% (355/562) were male. The median age of the patients was 59.0 years (range, 21–82 y). The median BMI was 22.8 kg/m² (range, 14.6–34.5 kg/m²). A total of 41.8% of patients were evaluated as malnutrition (PG-SGA ≥ 4), and 11.9% were diagnosed with severe malnutrition (PG-SGA ≥ 9). For the GLIM criteria, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26.9%, and severe malnutrition was 12.3%. For all criteria combinations of GLIM together versus PG-SGA, sensitivity was 60.4% (53.8–66.7), specificity was 97.9% (95.4–99.1), while the accordance between GLIM and PG-SGA was moderate (κ = 0.614). The performance of the GLIM worsened when MMR was excluded (κ = 0.515), with reduced sensitivity (50.2% (43.7–56.8)) and the same specificity (97.9% (95.4–99.1)). Including FFMI and ASMI by BIA can further improve the performance of GLIM than using CC alone (κ = 0.614 vs. κ = 0.565). Conclusions: It is important to include MMR in the GLIM framework. Using body composition measurement further improves the performance of the GLIM criteria than using anthropometric measurement alone.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Improving Long-Term Survival of Patients with Resectable Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term prognosis of patients with resectable rectal cancer is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable rectal cancer following treatment with neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Four major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library) were searched to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. The main outcome indicators were the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis revealed that 5-year OS (HR: 0.88, 95% Cl: 0.83-0.93) and DFS (HR: 0.95, 95% Cl: 0.91-0.98) were higher in patients with resectable rectal cancer after receiving neoadjuvant therapy than those treated with upfront surgery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the long-term survival of patients in Asia and Europe could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) improved the 5-year OS and DFS of patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ rectal cancer and mid/low rectal cancer. Further research found that patients with stage Ⅱ only had an increase in OS, while patients with stage Ⅲ have improved 5-year OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy improved the long-term survival of patients with mid/low rectal cancer in stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ (especially stage Ⅲ). Additionally, patients in Asia and Europe seemed to be more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For the treatment, we recommend neoadjuvant SCRT and neoadjuvant CRT for resectable rectal cancer.

Prevalence of malnutrition comparing NRS2002, MUST, and PG-SGA with the GLIM criteria in adults with cancer: A multi-center study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Patient-generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in light of the Global Leader Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

A multicenter observational study was conducted. Nutritional screening and assessment were performed at the time of admission to hospitals with the NRS2002, MUST, PG-SGA, and GLIM criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and Kappa (K) values were used to evaluate the performance of these tools.

RESULTS

Of the 637 included patients, 24.8% and 15.4% of patients were at moderate and high risk of malnutrition, respectively, using the NRS2002 and MUST. The NRS2002 was better correlated to the GLIM criteria with a higher value of Kappa (K = 0.823 vs. 0.596) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (K = 0.896 vs. 0.757) than the MUST. Meanwhile, 28.3% of patients were diagnosed as malnourished at the time of admission per the GLIM criteria, and 43.3% were malnourished per the PG-SGA. The PG-SGA had a fair agreement with the GLIM criteria (K = 0.453), revealing a positive predictive value of 52.9% and negative predictive value of 90.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NRS2002 was better correlated with the GLIM diagnostic criteria of malnutrition than the MUST. The PG-SGA was too sensitive to detect nutrition-related deteriorations, leading to a low positive predictive value in the malnutrition diagnosis. Thus, the GLIM criteria could be used to confirm the presence of malnutrition identified by the PG-SGA in adults with cancer.

Preoperative Nutritional Status Predicts Major Morbidity After Primary Rectal Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes, but data regarding its impact specifically in rectal cancer are sparse. The goal of this study was to use national data to determine the effects of malnutrition on surgical outcomes in rectal cancer resection.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Initiative Program from the years 2012-2015. Patients were included on the basis of International Classification of Disease 9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology codes for rectal cancer and proctectomy. Malnutrition was defined as body mass index <18.5 kg/m², weight loss >10% in 6 mo, or preoperative albumin <3.5 mg/dL. Associations between malnutrition and postoperative outcomes were assessed by the Student t-test and chi-square test. Multivariate regression models were constructed to adjust for potential confounders of the association between malnutrition and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 9289 patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent resection, 1425 (15%) were in a state of malnutrition at the time of surgery. Patients with malnutrition had longer mean length of stay (LOS), and higher rates of 30-d mortality, wound infection, organ-space infection, sepsis, reoperation, prolonged LOS (>30 d), failure to wean off ventilator, renal failure, and cardiac arrest. With the exception of LOS, renal failure, and organ-space infection, malnutrition was still significantly associated with higher rates of these adverse outcomes after adjustment for confounders in multivariate regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition is a practical marker associated with a variety of adverse outcomes after rectal cancer surgery, and it represents a potential target for nutritional therapies to improve surgical outcomes.

Influence of chemoradiotherapy on nutritional status in locally advanced rectal cancer: Prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on nutritional status and the association between changes in nutritional status and clinical outcomes (treatment completion, adverse events, perioperative complications, and relapse-free survival [RFS]) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

In this multicenter, phase II study, 41 patients with LARC underwent CRT for 5 wk, followed by a 6- to 8-wk interval before surgery. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), lean body mass, serum albumin, and prealbumin levels were measured before (pre-), during, and after CRT, and before surgery. Changes in these data and scores on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) were calculated based on pre-CRT status.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (29.3%) experienced body weight loss (BWL) ≥5% (defined as malnutrition) after CRT (P < 0.001) and before surgery (P = 0.035). Significant changes were seen in serum albumin levels and BMI during and after CRT (P < 0.001), and in MUST scores after CRT (P = 0.003) and before surgery (P = 0.035). Treatment completion was significantly associated with BWL (P = 0.028), MUST score (P = 0.013), and decreased serum albumin level (P = 0.001) after CRT. Regarding adverse events, MUST score before surgery (P = 0.009) and serum albumin level after CRT (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with diarrhea severity. Serum albumin level during CRT was associated with the onset of neutropenia (P = 0.005). No association was found between BWL and RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that malnutrition and changes in nutritional status are not only commonly observed after CRT, but also associated with treatment completion and adverse events.

Prognosis and risk factors for the development of pulmonary metastases after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical resection in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Although preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently considered effective for treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a proportion of patients develop postoperative pulmonary metastases. The current study aimed to assess the prognostic characteristics and risk factors for the development of rectal cancer pulmonary metastases after CRT and radical resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data collected on 544 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with LARC and underwent preoperative CRT followed by tumor radical resection between December 2003 and June 2014. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pulmonary metastasis rates were calculated and compared among the subgroups, and risk factors for pulmonary metastases were identified by Cox models.

Results

A total of 61 (11.2%) patients developed pulmonary metastases postoperatively, 45 of whom (73.8%) developed the condition in the first 24 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year pulmonary metastasis rates were 6.7%, 10.4%, and 11.7%, respectively. Compared with the disease-free group, the pulmonary metastases group had a significantly lower proportion of downstaging and pathological complete regression (pCR) rate and a significantly higher proportion of low rectum tumor. In multivariate analysis, a distance of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge [hazard ratio (HR), 1.394; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.211-3.736; P=0.003] was identified as an independent negative predictor of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate, and N0 stage (HR, 0.490; 95% CI, 0.261-0.919; P=0.026) and TNM downstaging (HR, 0.514; 95% CI, 0.265-0.997; P=0.049) were identified as independent positive predictors of the 3-year pulmonary metastasis rate.

Conclusions

Pulmonary metastases warranted a more intensive follow-up in patients with low rectal cancer, lymph node metastases and poor response after preoperative CRT and radical tumor resection.

The efficacy and safety of lateral lymph node dissection for patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer was first reported in the 1950s, since then, there has been an on-going debate about the value of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in the management of rectal cancer. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the value of LLND for the patients with rectal cancer. To collect clinical studies for the comparison of LLND and non-LLND in patients with rectal cancer, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to 2019.A total of 26 studies, including 6865 patients were enrolled. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 software and Review Manager 5.3 software. Outcome measures included the 5-year survival rate, recurrence rate, perioperative outcomes, urinary function, and male sexual function. Regarding efficacy, our meta-analysis results showed no difference in 5-year disease-free survival rate and local recurrences between the two groups, the Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was1.07 and 0.89 to 1.28 (P = 0.496),and the Odds Ratio(OR) and 95% CI were 0.90 and 0.76 to 1.06 (P = 0.208), respectively. Concerning safety, the incidence of urinary dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction was significantly increased in the LLND group (OR = 2.14, 95%CI = 1.21-3.79, P = 0.009), and (OR = 4.19, 95%CI = 1.55-11.33, P = 0.005), respectively. In conclusion, LLND did not improve the long-term prognosis of patients with rectal cancer, and was associated with increased urinary dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction.

Nutritional status in patients with advanced lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective observational study

Purpose: The consequences of malnutrition include increased risk of many complications. The assessment and management of nutritional problems are essential in supportive care of patients undergoing therapy. The primary objective of the present study was to assess changes in the nutritional status in lung cancer patients who had undergone chemotherapy.Patients and methods: Preliminary and post-chemotherapy assessments of patients' nutritional status and medical characteristics were conducted using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) from July 2014 to May 2016 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Four hundred sixty-five advanced lung cancer patients (51.8% men and 48.2% women with a mean (SD) age of 60.2 ± 9.8 years) participated in the present study. PG-SGA was assessed prior to the initiation of chemotherapy and after four cycles of chemotherapy.Results: We found that 11.4% of the patients were severely malnourished and 65.6% of the patients were moderately malnourished prior to chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, 52.9% of the patients were considered moderately malnourished, whereas 33.8% were severely malnourished. The nutritional status had deteriorated in the majority of patients. After chemotherapy, there was a rise in the prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms.Conclusions: A deteriorated nutritional status was the result of the side effects caused by chemotherapy in the patients of the present study. These findings highlight that more attention should be paid to improve the nutritional status in patients with advanced lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy, and proper nutrition education and nutritional support should be provided to these patients.

Nutritional Therapy in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemoradiotherapy: Should We Need Stronger Recommendations to Act for Improving Outcomes?

One of the challenges during chemotherapy and radiotherapy is to complete the planned cycles and doses without dose-limiting toxicity. Growing evidence clearly demonstrates the relationship between dose-limiting toxicity and low muscle mass. Moreover, malnutrition leads to low performance status, impaired quality of life, unplanned hospital admissions, and reduced survival.

In the past, the lack of clear and authoritative recommendations and guidelines has meant that oncologists have not always fully appreciated the importance of nutritional therapy in patients receiving anticancer treatments. Therefore, collaboration between oncologists and clinical nutrition specialists needs to be urgently improved.

Recent guidelines from scientific societies and practical recommendations by inter-society consensus documents can be summarized as follows: 1) timely nutritional therapy should be carefully considered if patients undergoing anticancer treatments are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition due to inadequate oral intake; 2) if oral intake is inadequate despite counseling and oral nutritional supplements, supplemental enteral nutrition or, if this is not sufficient or feasible, parenteral nutrition should be considered; 3) home artificial nutrition should be prescribed and regularly monitored using defined protocols developed between oncologists and clinical nutrition specialists; 4) appropriate nutritional management in the context of simultaneous care should become a guaranteed right for all patients with cancer.

The purpose of this review is to provide oncologists with an overview of the aims and current evidence about nutrition in oncology, together with updated practical and concise recommendations on the application of nutritional therapy in cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Profiling Determinants of Resting Energy Expenditure in Colorectal Cancer

Background: Understanding resting energy expenditure (REE) is important for determining energy requirements; REE might be altered in individuals with cancer. The objective of this study was to characterize determinants of REE in patients with stages II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods: REE was measured via indirect calorimetry in patients with newly diagnosed CRC. Computerized tomography images from medical records ascertained skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue cross-sectional areas, which were then transformed to lean soft tissue (LST) and fat mass (FM) values (in kg). Linear regression assessed determinants of REE.Results: 86 patients were included (n = 55, 64.0% male; 60 ± 12 years old; median body mass index: 27.6, interquartile range: 24.3-31.2 kg/m²), with most (n = 40) having stage III disease. Age, sex, and weight were significant predictors of REE [R² = 0.829, standard error of the estimate (SEE): 128 kcal/day, P < 0.001]. Replacing weight with LST and FM yielded a similar model, with age, sex, LST, and FM predictive of REE (R² = 0.820, SEE: 129 kcal/day, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Age, sex, weight, LST, and FM were the main contributors to REE. Further investigation of REE changes over time and its relationship to total energy expenditure, dietary intake, and clinical outcomes should be explored.

Total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable mid/low rectal cancer: a long-term analysis of a prospective, single-center, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The preliminary results of our phase II randomized trial reported comparable functional sphincter preservation rates and short-term survival outcomes between patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We now report the long-term results after a median follow-up of 71 months.

METHODS

Between March 23, 2008 and August 2, 2012, 192 patients with T3-T4 or node-positive, resectable, mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive TME with or without preoperative CCRT. The following endpoints were assessed: cumulative rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The data of 184 eligible patients were analyzed: 94 patients in the TME group and 90 patients in the CCRT + TME group. In the whole cohort, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were 84.8% and 85.1%, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates were 85.2% in the CCRT + TME group and 84.3% in the TME group (P = 0.969), and the 5-year OS rates were 83.5% in the CCRT + TME group and 86.5% in the TME group (P = 0.719). The 5-year cumulative rates of local recurrence were 6.3% and 5.0% (P = 0.681), and the 5-year cumulative rates of distant metastasis were 15.0% and 15.7% (P = 0.881) in the CCRT + TME and TME groups, respectively. No significant improvements in 5-year DFS and OS were observed with CCRT by subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatment strategies yielded similar long-term outcomes. A selective policy towards preoperative CCRT is thus recommended for rectal cancer patients if high-quality TME surgery and enhanced chemotherapy can be performed. Trial registration ChiCTR-TRC-08000122. Registered 16 July 2008.

Implications of weight loss for cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-associated weight loss is a common comorbid condition best described among patients with advanced malignancy receiving systemic therapy, but its relationship to patients undergoing radiation treatment is less well described. We review the interaction between cancer-associated weight loss and radiation treatment as well as its prognostic significance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies demonstrate a consistent detrimental effect of cancer-associated weight loss either existing prior to treatment or developing during radiotherapy. Emerging data suggest cancer-associated weight loss independently contributes to an aggressive malignant phenotype rather than simply reflecting a consequence of disease. Novel therapies are urgently needed to address the unmet burden of cancer-associated weight loss.

SUMMARY

Consideration of cancer-associated weight loss is important among patients receiving radiotherapy. Further study will further characterize the relationship and identify targetable biologic mechanisms of cancer cachexia.

The relationship between body mass index changes during chemotherapy and prognosis of patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

We investigated the relationships between body mass index change (ΔBMI) and prognoses and clinical effects of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).From January 2008 to December 2012, 224patients with stage IV CRC were diagnosed in our hospital, and their clinical and pathological data were collected for this retrospective study. These patients were divided into lowΔ BMI group (ΔBMI ≤-0.45 kg/m) and high ΔBMI (ΔBMI >-0.45 kg/m) group.After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, there were no significant differences between prediagnosis BMI, ΔBMI, and clinical effects (P = .196; P = .59).There was also no significant difference in median progression-free survival of the high ΔBMI and low ΔBMI groups (P = .530). The overall survival (OS) time of the high ΔBMI group was significantly longer than that of the low ΔBMI group (P = .002). Family history (P = .041), eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) score (P = .001), ΔBMI (P = .023), and carcinoembryonic antigen, (P = 0.02) were independent predictive factors of OS rates in patients with CRC. The relative risk was 0.72-fold for patients with CRC patients with high ΔBMI levels, relative to those with lower ΔBMI levels.Our results demonstrate that ΔBMI decreases predict poor prognoses for patients with advanced CRC, and elevated ΔBMI was a predictive factor for high survival rate. Thus, ΔBMI appears to be an independent predictive factor of CRC survival rates.

Genetic variations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway predict tumor response and disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery

Objective: Although preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), the clinical efficacy differs among patients. This study was conducted to determine the association between genetic variations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway and clinical outcomes in LARC patients. Methods: Sixteen tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five core genes (PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT1, AKT2, and FRAP1) were genotyped. The associations of these SNPs with tumor response to preoperative CRT, postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted by age, sex, clinical stage, tumor differentiation, tumor location, cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and time interval from CRT completion to surgery. Results: In an analysis of 97 LARC patients, the G/T+G/G genotype of AKT1:rs2498804 was associated with an increased tumor response rate (adjusted OR = 2.909, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.127-7.505, P = 0.027). At a median of 65.7 months of follow-up, the G/C+C/C genotype of AKT2:rs8100018 was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative recurrence (adjusted HR = 0.414; 95% CI, 0.187-0.914, P = 0.029). Patients carrying the G/C+C/C genotype in AKT2:rs8100018 presented a higher 5-year DFS rate than those with the wild-type genotype (79.2% vs. 62.3%, P = 0.038). None of the SNPs were significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) or 5-year OS. Conclusions: The current study indicates that genetic variations within the PI3K/ PTEN/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway are associated with the clinical outcomes of LARC patients undergoing preoperative CRT followed by radical surgery.

Effect of body thickness on helical and direct treatment delivery modes: a phantom study

Objective: Chemoradiation therapy is among the standard treatments for cancer, which often causes a decrease in appetite and subsequent weight loss. When weight loss occurs during treatment, the external body contour changes from that indicated during initial planning, causing changes in dose distribution to the target tumor regions and organs at risk (OARs). This study aimed to examine the dose changes to both the target regions and OARs, based on the dose-volume histogram (DVH).

Methods: We established a 60 mm-diameter planning target volume (PTV) and a 30 mm-diameter rectum region of interest (OAR), using a phantom; this was followed by a 50 Gy/25 fraction irradiation to the target region that was measured using a two-dimensional-array ion chamber device. The measurement was conducted by varying the bolus thickness from 0 to −25 mm, in 5 mm decrements. In addition, the maximum dose for both PTV and OAR were evaluated based on the DVH, created using the Adaptive software.

Results: The gamma analysis showed that the pass rate was less than 95% when the bolus thickness was altered by −25 mm for the helical delivery mode and by −10 mm for the direct delivery mode, resulting in a dose error greater than 3%. Results of the DVH evaluation revealed that the maximum dose of PTV increased by 5.18% when the bolus thickness was −25 mm for helical delivery, whereas a 9.95% increase was noted for the direct delivery mode compared with the dose at the reference level of 0 mm bolus thickness.

Discussion: Our results suggest that it is necessary to formulate a new treatment plan owing to increased dose error, if the body thickness decreases by more than 20 mm and 10 mm for the helical and direct delivery modes, respectively. The results also demonstrate that helical delivery is less affected by changes in body thickness than direct delivery.

Survival analysis in rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: various methods with different results

PURPOSE

Survival is an important indicator of outcome quality in rectal carcinoma. The 5-year survival rate is the typical outcome measurement. In patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative surgery, 7 years of follow-up is recommended. Different methods of survival analysis lead to different results. Here, we compared four different methods.

METHODS

The data of 439 patients with rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery between 1995 and 2010 were analysed. After stratifying by stage, relative survival (RS), cancer-related survival (CRS), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared. In particular, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was compared to the 5- and 7-year overall survival rates.

RESULTS

In the total cohort, the 5-year survival rates ranged from 90% (RS), over 84% (CRS) and 83% (OS) to 72% (DFS). Depending on the stage of disease, the differences between the 5-year survival rates varied between 10 and 32 percentage points. The differences were lowest in UICC stage y0 and highest in UICC stage yIV. The 3-year DFS-rate was always lower (worse) than the 5-year OS rate and higher (better) than the 7-year OS rate, with the exception of stage yIV.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons of survival are only meaningful if the same methods are applied. The 3-year rate of DFS was always worse than the rate of 5-year OS. Therefore, the 3-year rate of DFS appears to be a useful surrogate indicator in rectal carcinoma treatment studies.

Oncogene mutation profile predicts tumor regression and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery

Tumor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative survival differs among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The objective was to find correlations of mutated oncogenes and clinical outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 70 patients with preoperative preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery at a single cancer center between 2006 and 2012 were enrolled. Pretreatment tumor biopsy samples were assayed for 238 mutation hotspots harboring 19 oncogenes by time-of-flight mass spectrometry and OncoCarta Array. Oncogene mutations were found in 48.6% of patients (34/70). KRAS was the most frequent driver mutation, found in 35.7% of patients (25/70), followed by PIK3CA (14.3%), NRAS (5.7%), FLT3 (2.9%), and BRAF (1.4%). Multiple gene mutations were observed in eight patients (11.4%). Tumors with KRAS mutations responded poorly to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.044). Patients with oncogene mutations had worse 3-year disease-free survival than those without mutations (67.2% vs 94.2%, p = 0.010). Patients with KRAS or RAS mutations had lower 3-year disease-free survival (68% vs 88.3%, p = 0.016; 65.5% vs 92.3%, p = 0.004, respectively) and 3-year overall survival (88% vs 95.4%, p = 0.020; 89.7% vs 94.9%, p = 0.036, respectively) than those without KRAS or RAS mutations. Oncogene mutation status affected tumor response to treatment and long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer.