1
|
Quach H, Parmar G, Mateos MV, Ailawadhi S, Leleu X. Recent Developments in Convenience of Administration of the Anti-CD38 Antibody Isatuximab: Subcutaneous Delivery and Fast Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:358-363. [PMID: 38519329 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Isatuximab-based combinations are among the accepted standard-of-care regimens for early-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM and IKEMA trials. Further study findings have shown benefit with Isa-based combinations in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as reported from the randomized GMMG-HD7 and CONCEPT trials. Isa is currently approved in various countries for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with RRMM. A more convenient route of administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) injection, and faster IV infusion may substantially increase convenience of treatment. In this review, we outline evidence emerging from clinical trials that shows increasing clinical applicability of Isa across the MM therapeutic spectrum. We then review recent study results demonstrating that new treatment modalities, either SC Isa administration via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) or fast, 30-minute, fixed-volume IV infusion, are safe and effective, and enhance convenience of treatment with Isa for MM patients and healthcare providers. In the recently reported Phase 1b study, the safety profile and efficacy of Isa administered SC plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone were comparable to those observed with Isa administered IV plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in the control arm and in the ICARIA-MM trial. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes indicated patient confidence in SC Isa administration and satisfaction with treatment delivery by OBDS. These findings point to SC administration as the preferred route for future treatment with Isa-based combinations, as well as to the use of fast, 30-minute IV infusions in settings where SC administration of Isa might not be available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Quach
- Clinical Haematology Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - Gurdeep Parmar
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- University Hospital of Salamanca and Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSICUSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Xavier Leleu
- Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and CIC Inserm 1402, Poitiers Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stevenson J, Poker R, Schoss J, Campbell M, Everitt C, Holly B, Stones N, Pettis RJ, Sanchez-Felix M. Pharmaceutical and biotech industry perspectives on optimizing patient experience and treatment adherence through subcutaneous drug delivery design. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2024; 209:115322. [PMID: 38677443 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
Subcutaneous (SC) drug delivery can be a safe, effective alternative to the traditional intravenous route of administration, potentially offering notable advantages for both patients and healthcare providers. The SC Drug Development & Delivery Consortium convened in 2018 to raise awareness of industry challenges to advance the development of patient-centric SC drug delivery strategies. The SC Consortium identified better understanding of patient preferences and perspectives as necessary to optimize SC product design attributes and help guide design decisions during SC product development. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of patient-centric factors for consideration in the SC drug delivery design and development process with the aim of establishing a foundation of existing knowledge for patient experiences related to SC drug delivery. This overview is informed by the outcomes of a multi-step survey of Consortium members and key pharmaceutical stakeholders. Framed in the context of the patient's treatment journey, the survey findings offer future perspectives to fill data gaps to advance patient-centric SC drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Poker
- AstraZeneca, Human Factors Engineering, BioPharmaceutical Development, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, 121 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | | | - Claire Everitt
- Pfizer, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GP, UK
| | - Brian Holly
- Pfizer, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GP, UK
| | - Nicholas Stones
- Novartis Pharma AG, Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ronald J Pettis
- Becton-Dickinson, 21 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27513, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pradelli L, Massaia M, Todisco E, Gherlinzoni F, Furlan A, La Targia M, Grande E, Tripoli IE, Occhipinti F, Comello F, Iannello F, Bellucci S. Improved efficiency of daratumumab treatment of multiple myeloma adopting the subcutaneous route: A micro-costing analysis in three Italian hematology centers. Cancer Med 2023; 12:21480-21489. [PMID: 37942566 PMCID: PMC10726826 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daratumumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Subcutaneous (SC) formulation proved to be non-inferior in comparison with intravenous (IV) administration route. This study aimed at assessing the economic and time impact associated with the use of SC versus IV daratumumab in patients with RRMM from the perspective of the hematology center. METHODS This was a 5-month multicenter time-and-motion cross-sectional micro-costing study conducted in three Italian hematology centers among adult patients diagnosed with RRMM with ongoing treatment with IV or SC daratumumab. Measurements were performed by an ad hoc App. RESULTS Nineteen (20%) IV and 76 (80%) SC administration procedures were measured. Patients spent a mean of 4.85 ± 0.91 or 1.08 ± 0.56 h in the hematology center to receive IV or SC daratumumab, respectively. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) spent a mean of 49.38 ± 16.13 and 20.37 ± 7.88 min of active working time to manage IV and SC administrations, respectively. The infusion chair was occupied for a mean of 4.85 ± 0.91 and 0.99 ± 0.55 h during IV or SC administration, respectively. On average, considering the costs due to HCP and chair time, materials, and overhead costs, every IV and SC administration costed €80.33 and 34.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, as compared with IV administration, SC daratumumab was associated with 78%, 59%, 80% savings in terms of patient time, HCP active working time, and infusion chair, respectively, and 56.6% budget savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anna Furlan
- Divisione di EmatologiaOspedale Cà Foncello di Treviso–ASL 2TrevisoItaly
| | - Maria La Targia
- U.O. Ematologia ASST Valle Olona Busto ArsizioBusto ArsizioItaly
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Comello
- Divisione di EmatologiaOspedale Cà Foncello di Treviso–ASL 2TrevisoItaly
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fonseca R, Chinaeke EE, Gupta-Werner N, Fu AZ, Kaila S. Real-world Duration of Use and Dosing Frequency of Daratumumab in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2023; 7:430-436. [PMID: 37731678 PMCID: PMC10507479 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Daratumumab (DARA) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved as a combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and as monotherapy and combination therapy for relapsed or refractory MM cases. We assessed the length of DARA use across lines of therapy and the probabilities of treatment discontinuation in patients with MM in the real-world. We used the deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from Optum to identify patients with MM (n=2124) who received DARA-containing treatment between November 1, 2015 and March 31, 2021 in the United States. Patients were excluded if they had received a stem cell transplant. The duration of DARA use was defined as the time interval between the first initiation and discontinuation of DARA as a time-to-event outcome using the Kaplan-Meier method. A gap of more than 60 days between 2 consequent DARA claim dates was defined as DARA discontinuation. The median duration of continuous DARA use was 16.6 months. By 24 months, 33.1% of patients remained on DARA treatment. In a subgroup analysis of patients with 12 months or more continuous insurance coverage (n=1246), the median length of DARA use was 24.7 months; by 24 months, 51.8% remained on DARA treatment. The dose adherence ratios (observed DARA doses relative to the label) were close to 1.0, particularly among patients with longer follow-up, indicating that real-world DARA dosing frequency was similar to that on the approved label. In summary, this real-world analysis reported that the median duration of continuous DARA use is 16.6 months, with high dosing adherence in patients who have MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Alex Z. Fu
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, New Jersey
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tervonen T, Duenas A, Collacott H, Lam A, Gries KS, Carson R, Trevor N, Krucien N, He J. Current Health State Affected Patient Preferences More Than Disease Status: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Multiple Myeloma. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:909-917. [PMID: 36738785 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine how disease status and current health state influence treatment preferences of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS Participants with MM from France, Germany, and the United Kingdom completed a web-based survey that included a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and EQ-5D assessment. The DCE elicited preferences for 8 attributes: increased life expectancy, increased time to relapse, pain, fatigue, risk of infection, administration (route and duration), frequency of administration, and monitoring. Multinomial logit models were used to analyze DCE preference data and to calculate life expectancy trade-offs. RESULTS Three hundred participants with MM (newly diagnosed, transplant eligible, n = 108; newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible, n = 105; relapsed-refractory, n = 87) completed the survey. The most valued attributes were pain, fatigue, and increased life expectancy. Participants would want an additional 2.7 years of life expectancy (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-3.1 years) to tolerate extreme pain and an additional 2.0 years of life expectancy (95% CI 1.6-2.3 years) to tolerate constant fatigue. Participants in a better health state (third EQ-5D score quartile [0.897]) required less additional life expectancy than participants with a worse health state (first EQ-5D score quartile [0.662]) to tolerate extreme pain (2.3 years [95% CI 1.9-2.6 years] vs 3.0 years [95% CI 2.6-3.4 years]; P = .007). There was little difference in treatment preferences between newly diagnosed and relapsed-refractory patients for pain, fatigue, and increased life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS Current health state influenced treatment preferences of patients with MM more than disease status and should be considered when making treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Annette Lam
- Janssen Global Services LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | | | - Robin Carson
- Janssen Research & Development LLC, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Jianming He
- Janssen Global Services LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Soefje SA, Carpenter C, Carlson K, Awasthi S, Lin TS, Kaila S, Tarjan D, Kayal N, Kirkup C, Wagner TE, Gray KS, Kumar S. Clinical Administration Characteristics of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients With Multiple Myeloma at Mayo Clinic Infusion Centers. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e542-e549. [PMID: 36758192 PMCID: PMC10101255 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Median duration of daratumumab (DARA) administration for treatment of multiple myeloma is 3-7 hours for the intravenous formulation (DARA IV) and 3-5 minutes for the subcutaneous formulation (DARA SC). Here, we describe clinical administration characteristics of DARA using a novel method for data extraction from electronic health records. METHODS Time-based measurements were extracted using a scheduling/pharmacy software program that tracked patient movement through appointments for patients initiating DARA in Mayo Clinic infusion centers from April 5, 2017, to October 14, 2021. Cohorts included patients who received DARA IV or DARA SC, or converted from DARA IV to DARA SC. The DARA SC cohort was further analyzed before (DARA SC initial) and after (DARA SC shortened) a reduction in the postadministration observation time mandated by the treatment plan. Events associated with administration-related reactions (ARRs) were also identified. RESULTS Median total clinic times were 2.7-3.0 hours shorter for DARA SC versus DARA IV. Median clinic times were highest at dose 1 and decreased with subsequent doses. Median total chair times were 2.7-2.8 hours shorter for DARA SC versus DARA IV. Incidences of ARR-related events with DARA SC were low across doses. CONCLUSION Reduced clinic times were observed with DARA SC, indicating that use of DARA SC as a treatment option results in time savings that may free clinic resources. Furthermore, novel methods of electronic health record data extraction can provide insights that may help inform clinic resource optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A. Soefje
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shaji Kumar
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Korde N, Usmani SZ. Cross Fire: Daratumumab-Based Therapies Are Standard of Care in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2023; 16:117-123. [PMID: 34343494 DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Korde
- Multiple Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saad Z Usmani
- Plasma Cell Disorders Division, Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cook G, Ashcroft J, Fernandez M, Henshaw S, Khalaf Z, Pratt G, Tailor A, Rabin N. Benefits of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous daratumumab: Perspectives from UK healthcare providers. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1063144. [PMID: 36910662 PMCID: PMC9996301 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1063144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Daratumumab is a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody indicated to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Daratumumab was initially administered intravenously (IV), subsequently a subcutaneous (SC) formulation was developed to increase convenience of administration. The UK was an early adopter of SC daratumumab and, as such, this report provides consensus recommendations from a group of UK MM experts, with the aim of facilitating the transition from IV to SC daratumumab for other European healthcare providers. The switch from IV to SC daratumumab has been beneficial to patients and healthcare providers, as it simplifies treatment, reduces pressure on hospitals and can improve patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John Ashcroft
- Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.,Department of Haematology, Pinderfields General Hospital, Wakefield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sarah Henshaw
- Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zeyad Khalaf
- Janssen Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Guy Pratt
- Department of Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anish Tailor
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Rabin
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bittner B. Customer-centric product presentations for monoclonal antibodies. AAPS OPEN 2023; 9:3. [PMID: 36713112 PMCID: PMC9869842 DOI: 10.1186/s41120-022-00069-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Delivering customer-centric product presentations for biotherapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), represents a long-standing and paramount area of engagement for pharmaceutical scientists. Activities include improving experience with the dosing procedure, reducing drug administration-related expenditures, and ultimately shifting parenteral treatments outside of a controlled healthcare institutional setting. In times of increasingly cost-constrained markets and reinforced with the coronavirus pandemic, this discipline of "Product Optimization" in healthcare has gained momentum and changed from a nice-to-have into a must. This review summarizes latest trends in the healthcare ecosystem that inform key strategies for developing customer-centric products, including the availability of a wider array of sustainable drug delivery options and treatment management plans that support dosing in a flexible care setting. Three disease area archetypes with varying degree of implementation of customer-centric concepts are introduced to highlight relevant market differences and similarities. Namely, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and oncology have been chosen due to differences in the availability of subcutaneously dosed and ready-to-use self-administration products for mAb medicines and their follow-on biologics. Different launch scenarios are described from a manufacturer's perspective highlighting the necessity of platform approaches. To unfold the full potential of customer-centric care, value-based healthcare provider reimbursement schemes that incentivize the efficiency of care need to be broadly implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Bittner
- grid.417570.00000 0004 0374 1269F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Global Product Strategy - Product Optimization, Grenzacher Strasse 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Usmani SZ, Nahi H, Legiec W, Grosicki S, Vorobyev V, Spicka I, Hungria V, Korenkova S, Bahlis NJ, Flogegard M, Bladé J, Moreau P, Kaiser M, Iida S, Laubach J, Magen H, Cavo M, Hulin C, White D, De Stefano V, Lantz K, O'Rourke L, Heuck C, Delioukina M, Qin X, Nnane I, Qi M, Mateos MV. Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2022; 107:2408-2417. [PMID: 35354247 PMCID: PMC9521240 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maximum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) μg/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) μg/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (≥10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice. (Clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03277105.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Z Usmani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Hareth Nahi
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital at Huddinge, Stockholm
| | - Wojciech Legiec
- Center of Oncology of the Lublin Region, St. Jana z Dukli, Lublin
| | - Sebastian Grosicki
- Department of Hematology and Cancer Prevention, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice
| | | | - Ivan Spicka
- 1st Medical Department - Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Nizar J Bahlis
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Max Flogegard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Falun General Hospital, Falun
| | - Joan Bladé
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes
| | - Martin Kaiser
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - Shinsuke Iida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya
| | - Jacob Laubach
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hila Magen
- Department of Hematology Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica, e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi, Bologna
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Pessac
| | - Darrell White
- Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre, Halifax, NS
| | - Valerio De Stefano
- Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
| | - Kristen Lantz
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA
| | - Lisa O'Rourke
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA
| | | | | | - Xiang Qin
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ
| | - Ivo Nnane
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA
| | - Ming Qi
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- University Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL/Cancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rini CJ, Roberts BC, Vaidyanathan A, Li A, Klug R, Sherman DB, Pettis RJ. Enabling faster subcutaneous delivery of larger volume, high viscosity fluids. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2022; 19:1165-1176. [PMID: 36053114 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2116425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many current subcutaneous (SC) biologic therapies may require >1 mL volume or have increased viscosity, necessitating new delivery system approaches. This study evaluated 2-mL large-volume autoinjector (LVAI) delivery performance across varying solution viscosities and design inputs to assess the design space and identify configurations that produce practical injection times. METHODS Investigational LVAI delivery duration and volume, depot location, and tissue effects were examined in both air and in vivo models across various pre-filled syringe (PFS) cannula types (27 G Ultra-thin wall [UTW], 27 G special thin wall [STW], or 29 G thin-wall [TW]), drive spring forces (SFLOW or SFHIGH), and Newtonian solutions (2.3-50 centipoise [cP]). RESULTS Within each design configuration, increasing PFS internal diameters and spring forces reduced delivery times, while increasing viscosity increased times. The 27 G UTW PFS/SFHIGH combination achieved shorter delivery times across all injection conditions, with 2 mL in vivo durations <15 seconds at ≤31 cP and routinely <20 seconds at 39 and 51 cP, with nominal and transitory tissue effects. CONCLUSION PFS cannula and spring force combinations can be tailored to achieve various injection durations across viscosities, while UTW PFS enables faster rates to potentially better accommodate human factors during LVAI injection, especially at high viscosity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Rini
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bruce C Roberts
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Aishwarya Vaidyanathan
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rick Klug
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Douglas B Sherman
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ronald J Pettis
- Translational and Clinical Sciences Center of Excellence, BD Technologies and Innovation, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steinbach M, Julian K, McClune B, Sborov DW. Toxicity management strategies for next-generation novel therapeutics in multiple myeloma. Ther Adv Hematol 2022; 13:20406207221100659. [PMID: 35860442 PMCID: PMC9289924 DOI: 10.1177/20406207221100659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic options available for patients with multiple myeloma have greatly expanded over the past decade and incorporating these novel agents into routine clinical practice has significantly improved outcomes. The next generation of therapeutics is available for relapsed and refractory patients either as standard of care or in clinical trial, and these drugs represent a generational paradigm shift. Patients now have access to a multitude of novel immunotherapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies, an antibody-drug conjugate, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T), and bispecific T-cell redirecting antibodies, and novel oral therapies including selinexor (selective inhibitor of nuclear export) and venetoclax (bcl-2 inhibitor). While these drugs have the potential to be highly efficacious in certain subsets of patients when used as single agents or in combination regimens, they are each associated with unique toxicity profiles. It is imperative to understand these potential adverse events to ensure patient safety. Appropriate supportive care management is paramount to maximize drug exposure and therapeutic efficacy. The following review focuses its discussion on drugs and combination regimens that are currently FDA-approved and those that continue to be investigated in clinical trials, highlights the clinically relevant toxicity profiles for each of the different agents, and provides practical considerations for the treatment team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Steinbach
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kelley Julian
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Utah,
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brian McClune
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Douglas W. Sborov
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt
Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Treatment Options for Patients With Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2022; 22:460-473. [PMID: 35148975 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Despite the increasing number of treatment options available for multiple myeloma, relapse is still inevitable and there remains a critical unmet need for treatments for patients with late-stage, highly refractory disease. In this review, we discuss currently approved treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, with a focus on the optimal management of patients with MM refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and in some cases, daratumumab or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Data from recent clinical trials of immunomodulatory agents (pomalidomide), proteasome inhibitors (PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib), monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab), and other novel therapies (including panobinostat-based therapy) are summarized. We also provide potential therapeutic strategies for patients according to different treatment histories, and include case studies to illustrate the practical use of various treatment options in a clinical setting. Regimens containing pomalidomide, elotuzumab, next-generation PIs, panobinostat, or selinexor may provide effective treatment options in patients with triple-refractory disease. The choice of agents used, and combinations thereof should be individualized as well as strategically planned from early- to late-stage relapse.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nathwani N, Bell J, Cherepanov D, Sowell FG, Shah R, McCarrier K, Hari P. Patient perspectives on symptoms, health-related quality of life, and treatment experience associated with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:5859-5869. [PMID: 35364733 PMCID: PMC9135799 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06979-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to better understand the patient perspective and treatment experience of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods This qualitative study enrolled adult RRMM patients from 6 US clinics who had ≥ 3 months of life expectancy, ≤ 6 prior lines of therapy, and ≥ 1 treatment regimen with a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator, or a CD38 monoclonal antibody or an alkylating agent, and a steroid. In-person semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to capture concepts that were relevant and important to patients. Topics included RRMM symptoms and impacts and the mode of administration, frequency, duration, convenience, side effects, and overall experience with RRMM treatment. Results A total of 22 patients completed interviews. At enrollment, 59.1% of participants were using regimens containing dexamethasone, 36.4% daratumumab, 27.3% carfilzomib, and 18.2% lenalidomide. More participants had experience using intravenous or injectable therapy alone (40.9%) than oral therapy alone (18.2%). Back pain and fatigue were the most frequently reported symptoms (40.9% each); 27.3% reported no symptoms. Most participants reported physical function limitations (86.4%), emotional impacts (77.3%), MM-related activity limitations (72.7%), and sleep disturbances (63.6%). Most participants perceived treatment effectiveness based on physician-explained clinical signs (68.2%) and symptom relief (40.9%). Participants experienced gastrointestinal adverse events (59.1%), fatigue (59.1%), sleep disturbances (31.8%), and allergic reactions (31.8%) with treatment. Key elements of treatment burden included the duration of a typical treatment day (68.2%), treatment interfering with daily activities (54.5%), and infusion duration (50.0%). Conclusions These results provide treatment experience–related data to further understand RRMM treatment burden and better inform treatment decision-making. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06979-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitya Nathwani
- Judy and Bernard Briskin Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Jill Bell
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Dasha Cherepanov
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Eisenberg S. Subcutaneous Administration: Evolution, Challenges, and the Role of Hyaluronidase. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:663-671. [PMID: 34800095 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.663-671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subcutaneous (SC) route has evolved significantly. More than two dozen chemotherapy and supportive therapies have been approved for use in the oncology setting. Several IV therapies have been approved for the SC route and require a significantly higher volume than historical maximum limits. Differences exist in how these drugs are administered as compared to older chemotherapy agents. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this article is to provide a brief history of the SC route and describe its role in cancer treatment. The use of recombinant hyaluronidase is reviewed within the context of SC monoclonal antibodies. Proper administration techniques and interventions for reducing patient discomfort are discussed. METHODS Sentinel medical texts, pharmacokinetic studies, manufacturer's recommendations, and peer-reviewed articles were examined. FINDINGS The SC route offers several advantages over the oral and IV routes. A clear understanding of anatomical site selection and injection techniques is beneficial for providing requisite patient education.
Collapse
|
16
|
[Reflections on the innovative research and development of hematologic oncology drugs under the new situation]. ZHONGHUA XUE YE XUE ZA ZHI = ZHONGHUA XUEYEXUE ZAZHI 2021; 42:969-973. [PMID: 35045665 PMCID: PMC8770877 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
17
|
Abramson HN. Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Promise and Challenges. Immunotargets Ther 2021; 10:343-371. [PMID: 34527606 PMCID: PMC8437262 DOI: 10.2147/itt.s306103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Whereas the treatment of MM was dependent solely on alkylating agents and corticosteroids during the prior three decades, the landscape of therapeutic measures to treat the disease began to expand enormously early in the current century. The introduction of new classes of small-molecule drugs, such as proteasome blockers (bortezomib and carfilzomib), immunomodulators (lenalidomide and pomalidomide), nuclear export inhibitors (selinexor), and histone deacetylase blockers (panobinostat), as well as the application of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), resulted in a seismic shift in how the disease is treated. The picture changed dramatically once again starting with the 2015 FDA approval of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) - the anti-CD38 daratumumab and the anti-SLAMF7 elotuzumab. Daratumumab, in particular, has had a great impact on MM therapy and today is often included in various regimens to treat the disease, both in newly diagnosed cases and in the relapse/refractory setting. Recently, other immunotherapies have been added to the arsenal of drugs available to fight this malignancy. These include isatuximab (also anti-CD38) and, in the past year, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) belantamab mafodotin and the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel). While the accumulated benefits of these newer agents have resulted in a doubling of the disease's five-year survival rate to more than 5 years and improved quality of life, the disease remains incurable. Almost without exception patients experience relapse and/or become refractory to the drugs used, making the search for innovative therapies all the more essential. This review covers the current scope of anti-myeloma immunotherapeutic agents, both those in clinical use and on the horizon, including naked mAbs, ADCs, bi- and multi-targeted mAbs, and CAR T-cells. Emphasis is placed on the benefits of each along with the challenges that need to be overcome if MM is to be considered curable in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanley N Abramson
- Wayne State University, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|