Real-world clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma receiving VTD-PACE treatment in the era of monoclonal antibodies

Bortezomib (Velcade), thalidomide, dexamethasone, platinum (cisplatin), adriamycin (doxorubicin), cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VTD-PACE) are commonly used as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, its outcomes in the era of monoclonal antibodies remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 60 patients with RRMM (median four prior treatment lines) administered VTD-PACE. The median follow-up period was 11.1 months, during which they received a median of two cycles of VTD-PACE. The overall response rate (ORR) was 66.7%; ORRs of 53.1 and 82.1% were noted in patients with ≥ 4 and ≤ 3 prior lines (P = 0.027), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.8 months. Using the 3-month time point after VTD-PACE treatment as a landmark, 54 patients were still alive. Landmark analysis was conducted for PFS and OS of patients who received or did not receive HSCT or CART after VTD-PACE treatment. Patients who underwent subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) following VTD-PACE showed a trend of longer PFS and OS than those who did not undergo subsequent HSCT or CART. The median OS in patients with and without renal dysfunction was 10.7 months and 21.5 months, respectively (P = 0.0091). Therefore, VTD-PACE is useful as a bridging therapy for HSCT or CART, as a response can be expected regardless of organ damage, disease risk, or history of anti-CD38 antibody use.

Cellular and humoral immunotherapy in children, adolescents and young adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The prognosis is dismal (2-year overall survival less than 25%) for childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Novel targeted therapies are desperately needed for this poor-risk population. CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, CD38, CD30, LMP1 and LMP2 are attractive targets for immunotherapy in CAYA patients with R/R NHL. Novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, antibody drug conjugates and T and natural killer (NK)-cell bispecific and trispecific engagers are being investigated in the R/R setting and are changing the landscape of NHL therapy. A variety of cellular immunotherapies such as viral activated cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, NK and CAR NK-cells have been investigated and provide alternative options for CAYA patients with R/R NHL. Here, we provide an update and clinical practice guidance of utilizing these cellular and humoral immunotherapies in CAYA patients with R/R NHL.

Treatment Options for Patients With Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Despite the increasing number of treatment options available for multiple myeloma, relapse is still inevitable and there remains a critical unmet need for treatments for patients with late-stage, highly refractory disease. In this review, we discuss currently approved treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, with a focus on the optimal management of patients with MM refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and in some cases, daratumumab or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Data from recent clinical trials of immunomodulatory agents (pomalidomide), proteasome inhibitors (PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib), monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab), and other novel therapies (including panobinostat-based therapy) are summarized. We also provide potential therapeutic strategies for patients according to different treatment histories, and include case studies to illustrate the practical use of various treatment options in a clinical setting. Regimens containing pomalidomide, elotuzumab, next-generation PIs, panobinostat, or selinexor may provide effective treatment options in patients with triple-refractory disease. The choice of agents used, and combinations thereof should be individualized as well as strategically planned from early- to late-stage relapse.

Low clinical protective response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with multiple myeloma

We conducted a prospective, three-center, observational study in Japan to evaluate the prevalence of seropositivity and clinically protective titer after coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia(PCD). Two-hundred sixty-nine patients with PCD [206 symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM)] were evaluated. Seropositivity was observed in 88.7% and a clinically protective titer in 38.3% of MM patients, both of which were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. Patients receiving anti-CD38 antibodies had much lower antibody titers, but antibody titers recovered in those who underwent a wash-out period before vaccine administration. Older age (≥65), anti-CD38 antibody administration, immunomodulatory drugs use, lymphopenia (<1000/μL), and lower polyclonal IgG (<550 mg/dL) had a negative impact for the sufficient antibody production according to multivariate analysis. Patients with clinically protective titer had a significantly higher number of CD19+ lymphocytes than those with lower antibody responses (114 vs. 35/μL, p = 0.016). Our results suggested that patients with PCD should be vaccinated, and that the ideal protocol is to temporarily interrupt anti-CD38 antibody therapy for a “wash-out” period of a few months, followed by a (booster) vaccine after the B-cells have recovery.

[Treatment strategy for untreated transplantation-ineligible multiple myeloma patients]

Novel drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and antibody drugs, have been consistently developed, and several standard treatment regimens were approved for elderly patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous transplantation. Meanwhile, the clinical characteristics of elderly patients are more diverse than those of younger patients in terms of various factors, such as cognitive, mental, or social functions as well as physical or organ functions. Therefore, it is difficult to implement a standard treatment regimen to all elderly patients with a one-size-fits-all approach. Furthermore, it is important to evaluate the diversity of elderly patients as objectively as possible by evaluating organ functions and frailty in accordance with geriatric assessment, which helps determine the treatment plan. In addition, it is also ideal to select the treatment after considering the factors associated with tumors, such as the presence or absence of unfavorable chromosomal abnormalities.