Recruitment rate of gymnophallid metacercariae in the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi: an experimental test of the hitch-hiking hypothesis

Cooperation and conflict in host manipulation: interactions among macro-parasites and micro-organisms

Several parasite species are known to manipulate the phenotype of their hosts in ways that enhance their own transmission. Co-occurrence of manipulative parasites, belonging to the same species or to more than one species, in a single host has been regularly observed. Little is known, however, on interactions between co-occurring manipulative parasites with same or different transmission routes. Several models addressing this problem have provided predictions on how cooperation and conflict between parasites could emerge from multiple infections. Here, we review the empirical evidence in favor of the existence of synergistic or antagonistic interactions between co-occurring parasites, and highlight the neglected role of micro-organisms. We particularly discuss the actual importance of selective forces shaping the evolution of interactions between manipulative parasites in relation to parasite prevalence in natural populations, efficiency in manipulation, and type of transmission (i.e., horizontal versus vertical), and we emphasize the potential for future research.

Disentangling the effects of exposure and susceptibility on transmission of the zoonotic parasite Schistosoma mansoni

For all parasites, transmission is composed of two processes: host contact with parasites ('exposure') and risk of infection given such contact ('susceptibility'). Classic models, such as mass action (density-dependent) transmission, lump these processes together. However, separating these processes could enhance predictions for disease dynamics, especially for free-living parasites. Here, we outline three transmission models that partition exposure and susceptibility. Using data from a study of Schistosoma mansoni (trematode) infections in Biomphalaria glabrata snails, we competed these three models against four alternative models, including the mass action model (which lumps exposure and susceptibility). The models that separately accounted for exposure and susceptibility best predicted prevalence across the density gradients of hosts and parasites, outperforming all other models based on Akaike information criterion. When embedded into a dynamic epidemiological model, the exposure-explicit models all predicted lower equilibrium densities of infected snails and human-infectious cercariae. Thus, population-level epidemiological models that utilize the classic mass action transmission model might overestimate human risk of schistosomiasis. More generally, the presented approach for disentangling exposure and susceptibility can distinguish between behavioural and immunological resistance, identify mechanisms of 'disease dilution' and provide a more complete dissection of drivers of parasite transmission.

The ecological significance of manipulative parasites

The diversity of ways in which host manipulation by parasites interferes with ecological and evolutionary processes governing biotic interactions has been recently documented, and indicates that manipulative parasites are full participants in the functioning of ecosystems. Phenotypic alterations in parasitised hosts modify host population ecology, apparent competition processes, food web structure and energy and nutrient flow between habitats, as well as favouring habitat creation. As is usually the case in ecology, these phenomena can be greatly amplified by a series of secondary consequences (cascade effects). Here we review the ecological relevance of manipulative parasites in ecosystems and propose directions for further research.

Accumulation of diverse parasite genotypes within the bivalve second intermediate host of the digenean Gymnophallus sp

The complex life cycle of digenean trematodes with alternating stages of asexual multiplication and sexual reproduction can generate interesting within-host population genetic patterns. Metacercarial stages found in the second intermediate host are generally accumulated from the environment. Highly mobile second intermediate hosts can sample a broad range of cercarial genotypes and accumulate genetically diverse packets of metacercariae, but it is unclear whether the same would occur in systems where the second intermediate host is relatively immobile and cercarial dispersal is the sole mechanism that can maintain genetic homogeneity at the population level. Here, using polymorphic microsatellite markers, we addressed this issue by genotyping metacercariae of the trematode Gymnophallus sp. from the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi. Despite the relatively sessile nature of the second intermediate host of Gymnophallus, very high genotypic diversity of metacercariae was found within cockles, with only two cockles harbouring multiple copies of a single clonal lineage. There was no evidence of population structuring at the scale of our study, suggesting the existence of a well-mixed population. Our results indicate that (i) even relatively sessile second intermediate hosts can accumulate a high diversity of genotypes and (ii) the dispersal ability of cercariae, whether passive or not, is much greater than expected for such small and short-lived organisms. The results also support the role of the second intermediate host as an accumulator of genetic diversity in the trematode life cycle.