1
|
Genetic Susceptibility for Low Testosterone in Men and Its Implications in Biology and Screening: Data from the UK Biobank. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 29:36-46. [PMID: 34337532 PMCID: PMC8317803 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite strong evidence of heritability, few studies have attempted to unveil the genetic underpinnings of testosterone levels. Objective To identify testosterone-associated loci in a large study and assess their biological and clinical implications. Design, setting, and participants The participants were men from the UK Biobank. A two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) was first used to identify/validate loci for low testosterone (LowT, <8 nmol/l) in 80% of men (N = 148 902). The cumulative effect of independent LowT risk loci was then evaluated in the remaining 20% of men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with LowT were tested using an additive model. Analyses of the expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) were performed to assess the associations between significant SNPs and expression of nearby genes (within 1 Mbp). A genetic risk score (GRS) was used to assess the cumulative effect of multiple independent SNPs on LowT risk. Results and limitations The two-stage GWAS found SNPs in 141 loci of 41 cytobands that were significantly associated with LowT (p < 5 × 10–8), including 94 novel loci from 38 cytobands. An eQTL analysis of these 141 loci revealed significant associations with RNA expression of 155 genes, including previously implicated (SHBG and JMJD1C) and novel (LIN28B, LCMT2, and ZBTB4) genes. Among the 141 loci, 42 were independently associated with LowT after a multivariable analysis. The GRS based on these 42 loci was significantly associated with LowT risk in independent individuals (N = 37 225, ptrend = 3.16 × 10–162). The risk ratio for LowT between men in the top and those in the bottom GRS deciles was 4.98-fold. Results are limited in generalizability as only Caucasians were studied. Conclusions Identification of the genetic variants associated with LowT may improve our understanding of its etiology and identify high-risk men for LowT screening. Patient summary We identified 141 new genetic loci that can be incorporated into a genetic risk score that can potentially identify men with low testosterone.
Collapse
|
2
|
Schaid DJ, McDonnell SK, FitzGerald LM, DeRycke L, Fogarty Z, Giles GG, MacInnis RJ, Southey MC, Nguyen-Dumont T, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Whittemore AS, Sieh W, Ioannidis NM, Hsieh CL, Stanford JL, Schleutker J, Cropp CD, Carpten J, Hoegel J, Eeles R, Kote-Jarai Z, Ackerman MJ, Klein CJ, Mandal D, Cooney KA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Helfand B, Catalona WJ, Wiklund F, Riska S, Bahetti S, Larson MC, Cannon Albright L, Teerlink C, Xu J, Isaacs W, Ostrander EA, Thibodeau SN. Two-stage Study of Familial Prostate Cancer by Whole-exome Sequencing and Custom Capture Identifies 10 Novel Genes Associated with the Risk of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2020; 79:353-361. [PMID: 32800727 PMCID: PMC7881048 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history of prostate cancer (PCa) is a well-known risk factor, and both common and rare genetic variants are associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE To detect new genetic variants associated with PCa, capitalizing on the role of family history and more aggressive PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A two-stage design was used. In stage one, whole-exome sequencing was used to identify potential risk alleles among affected men with a strong family history of disease or with more aggressive disease (491 cases and 429 controls). Aggressive disease was based on a sum of scores for Gleason score, node status, metastasis, tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, systemic recurrence, and time to PCa death. Genes identified in stage one were screened in stage two using a custom-capture design in an independent set of 2917 cases and 1899 controls. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Frequencies of genetic variants (singly or jointly in a gene) were compared between cases and controls. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Eleven genes previously reported to be associated with PCa were detected (ATM, BRCA2, HOXB13, FAM111A, EMSY, HNF1B, KLK3, MSMB, PCAT1, PRSS3, and TERT), as well as an additional 10 novel genes (PABPC1, QK1, FAM114A1, MUC6, MYCBP2, RAPGEF4, RNASEH2B, ULK4, XPO7, and THAP3). Of these 10 novel genes, all but PABPC1 and ULK4 were primarily associated with the risk of aggressive PCa. CONCLUSIONS Our approach demonstrates the advantage of gene sequencing in the search for genetic variants associated with PCa and the benefits of sampling patients with a strong family history of disease or an aggressive form of disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Multiple genes are associated with prostate cancer (PCa) among men with a strong family history of this disease or among men with an aggressive form of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Schaid
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Shannon K McDonnell
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Liesel M FitzGerald
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Lissa DeRycke
- Specialized Services, National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Zachary Fogarty
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Population Health Science and Policy, Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nilah Monnier Ioannidis
- Center for Computational Biology and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Chih-Lin Hsieh
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Janet L Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Johanna Schleutker
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, and Department of Medical Genetics, Genomics, Laboratory Division, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Cheryl D Cropp
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - John Carpten
- Department of Translation Genomics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Josef Hoegel
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton Surrey, UK
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton Surrey, UK
| | - Michael J Ackerman
- Division of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Diptasri Mandal
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Department of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joan E Bailey-Wilson
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian Helfand
- Department of Surgery, North Shore University Health System/University of Chicago, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - William J Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fredrick Wiklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shaun Riska
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Saurabh Bahetti
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa Cannon Albright
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Craig Teerlink
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Northshore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - William Isaacs
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elaine A Ostrander
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomic Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A genetic risk assessment for prostate cancer influences patients' risk perception and use of repeat PSA testing: a cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. BJGP Open 2020; 4:bjgpopen20X101039. [PMID: 32457098 PMCID: PMC7330221 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer among men in the western world. Genetic lifetime risk assessment could alleviate controversies about prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for early diagnosis. Aim To determine how men interpret information about their lifetime risk for PC and how this can affect their choice of having a repeated PSA test. Design & setting A genetic test was offered for assessment of individual PC lifetime risk in general practices in Denmark, with the purpose of promoting appropriate use of PSA testing. Method Participants had a genetic lifetime risk assessment for PC diagnosis (either high or normal risk). A month after receiving the result, participants answered a questionnaire about their perceived risk of getting or dying from PC compared with other men, as well as their intentions for repeated PSA testing. Results Nearly half (44.7%) of 555 participants who received the genetic risk assessment were not aware they had a genetic test. Nevertheless, compared with men with a normal genetic risk, those with high genetic risk reported higher perceived risk for PC (mean difference of 0.74 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.56 to 0.96] on a 5-point scale), higher perceived risk of dying from PC (mean difference of 0.48 [95% CI = 0.29 to 0.66] on a 5-point scale), and increased intention for repeated PSA testing (mean difference of 0.48 [95% CI = 0.30 to 0.65] on a 4-point scale). Conclusion Despite low awareness and/or understanding of the test result, a high genetic risk for PC made participants more aware of their risk, and it increased their intention and probability for repeated PSA testing.
Collapse
|
4
|
Helfand BT, Chen H, Fantus RJ, Conran CA, Brendler CB, Zheng SL, Walsh PC, Isaacs WB, Xu J. Differences in inherited risk among relatives of hereditary prostate cancer patients using genetic risk score. Prostate 2018; 78:1063-1068. [PMID: 29923209 PMCID: PMC6773522 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Family history assigns equivalent risk to all relatives based upon the degree of relationship. Recent genetic studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that can be used to calculate a genetic risk score (GRS) to determine prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We sought to determine whether GRS can stratify PCa risk among individuals in families considered to be at higher risk due their family history of PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Family members with hereditary PCa were recruited and genotyped for 17 SNPs associated with PCa. A GRS was calculated for all subjects. Analyses compared the distribution of GRS values among affected and unaffected family members of varying relationship degrees. RESULTS Data was available for 789 family members of probands including 552 affected and 237 unaffected relatives. Median GRSs were higher among first-degree relatives compared to second- and third-degree relatives. In addition, GRS values among affected first- and second-degree relatives were significantly higher than unaffected relatives (P = 0.042 and P = 0.016, respectively). Multivariate analysis including GRS and degree of relationship demonstrated that GRS was a significant and independent predictor of PCa (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.15-2.01). CONCLUSION GRS is an easy-to-interpret, objective measure that can be used to assess differences in PCa risk among family members of affected men. GRS allows for further differentiation among family members, providing better risk assessment. While prospective validation studies are required, this information can help guide relatives in regards to the time of initiation and frequency of PCa screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Helfand
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter for Urologic Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Haitao Chen
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Center for Genomic Translational Medicine and Prevention, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Richard J Fantus
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Carly A Conran
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter for Urologic Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Charles B Brendler
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter for Urologic Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Siquan Lilly Zheng
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter for Urologic Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Patrick C Walsh
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William B Isaacs
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter for Urologic Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winter JM, Gildea DE, Andreas JP, Gatti DM, Williams KA, Lee M, Hu Y, Zhang S, Mullikin JC, Wolfsberg TG, McDonnell SK, Fogarty ZC, Larson MC, French AJ, Schaid DJ, Thibodeau SN, Churchill GA, Crawford NPS. Mapping Complex Traits in a Diversity Outbred F1 Mouse Population Identifies Germline Modifiers of Metastasis in Human Prostate Cancer. Cell Syst 2016; 4:31-45.e6. [PMID: 27916600 DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Revised: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
It is unclear how standing genetic variation affects the prognosis of prostate cancer patients. To provide one controlled answer to this problem, we crossed a dominant, penetrant mouse model of prostate cancer to Diversity Outbred mice, a collection of animals that carries over 40 million SNPs. Integration of disease phenotype and SNP variation data in 493 F1 males identified a metastasis modifier locus on Chromosome 8 (LOD = 8.42); further analysis identified the genes Rwdd4, Cenpu, and Casp3 as functional effectors of this locus. Accordingly, analysis of over 5,300 prostate cancer patient samples revealed correlations between the presence of genetic variants at these loci, their expression levels, cancer aggressiveness, and patient survival. We also observed that ectopic overexpression of RWDD4 and CENPU increased the aggressiveness of two human prostate cancer cell lines. In aggregate, our approach demonstrates how well-characterized genetic variation in mice can be harnessed in conjunction with systems genetics approaches to identify and characterize germline modifiers of human disease processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Winter
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Derek E Gildea
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jonathan P Andreas
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Kendra A Williams
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Minnkyong Lee
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ying Hu
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| | - Suiyuan Zhang
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | -
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - James C Mullikin
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Tyra G Wolfsberg
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Shannon K McDonnell
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Zachary C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Amy J French
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Daniel J Schaid
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Nigel P S Crawford
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lange EM, Ribado JV, Zuhlke KA, Johnson AM, Keele GR, Li J, Wang Y, Duan Q, Li G, Gao Z, Li Y, Xu J, Zheng SL, Cooney KA. Assessing the Cumulative Contribution of New and Established Common Genetic Risk Factors to Early-Onset Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 25:766-72. [PMID: 26671023 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the evidence for association between 23 recently reported prostate cancer variants and early-onset prostate cancer and the aggregate value of 63 prostate cancer variants for predicting early-onset disease using 931 unrelated men diagnosed with prostate cancer prior to age 56 years and 1,126 male controls. METHODS Logistic regression models were used to test the evidence for association between the 23 new variants and early-onset prostate cancer. Weighted and unweighted sums of total risk alleles across these 23 variants and 40 established variants were constructed. Weights were based on previously reported effect size estimates. Receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots, using defined cut-points, were constructed to assess the predictive value of the burden of risk alleles on early-onset disease. RESULTS Ten of the 23 new variants demonstrated evidence (P < 0.05) for association with early-onset prostate cancer, including four that were significant after multiple test correction. The aggregate burden of risk alleles across the 63 variants was predictive of early-onset prostate cancer (AUC = 0.71 using weighted sums), especially in men with a high burden of total risk alleles. CONCLUSIONS A high burden of risk alleles is strongly associated with early-onset prostate cancer. IMPACT Our results provide the first formal replication for several of these 23 new variants and demonstrate that a high burden of common-variant risk alleles is a major risk factor for early-onset prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 766-72. ©2015 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan M Lange
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Jessica V Ribado
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kimberly A Zuhlke
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anna M Johnson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gregory R Keele
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Center for Translational Science, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, D.C
| | - Qing Duan
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ge Li
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Zhengrong Gao
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - S Lilly Zheng
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sood S, Gallagher IJ, Lunnon K, Rullman E, Keohane A, Crossland H, Phillips BE, Cederholm T, Jensen T, van Loon LJC, Lannfelt L, Kraus WE, Atherton PJ, Howard R, Gustafsson T, Hodges A, Timmons JA. A novel multi-tissue RNA diagnostic of healthy ageing relates to cognitive health status. Genome Biol 2015; 16:185. [PMID: 26343147 PMCID: PMC4561473 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0750-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostics of the human ageing process may help predict future healthcare needs or guide preventative measures for tackling diseases of older age. We take a transcriptomics approach to build the first reproducible multi-tissue RNA expression signature by gene-chip profiling tissue from sedentary normal subjects who reached 65 years of age in good health. RESULTS One hundred and fifty probe-sets form an accurate classifier of young versus older muscle tissue and this healthy ageing RNA classifier performed consistently in independent cohorts of human muscle, skin and brain tissue (n = 594, AUC = 0.83-0.96) and thus represents a biomarker for biological age. Using the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men birth-cohort (n = 108) we demonstrate that the RNA classifier is insensitive to confounding lifestyle biomarkers, while greater gene score at age 70 years is independently associated with better renal function at age 82 years and longevity. The gene score is 'up-regulated' in healthy human hippocampus with age, and when applied to blood RNA profiles from two large independent age-matched dementia case-control data sets (n = 717) the healthy controls have significantly greater gene scores than those with cognitive impairment. Alone, or when combined with our previously described prototype Alzheimer disease (AD) RNA 'disease signature', the healthy ageing RNA classifier is diagnostic for AD. CONCLUSIONS We identify a novel and statistically robust multi-tissue RNA signature of human healthy ageing that can act as a diagnostic of future health, using only a peripheral blood sample. This RNA signature has great potential to assist research aimed at finding treatments for and/or management of AD and other ageing-related conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjana Sood
- XRGenomics Ltd, London, UK
- Division of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, King's College London, 8th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Iain J Gallagher
- XRGenomics Ltd, London, UK
- School of Health, Stirling University, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Katie Lunnon
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
- Present address: University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Eric Rullman
- Division of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aoife Keohane
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah Crossland
- Division of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, King's College London, 8th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- School of Medicine, Derby Royal Hospital, Derbyshire, UK
| | | | - Tommy Cederholm
- Department of Public Health, Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Lars Lannfelt
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Molecular Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - William E Kraus
- Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert Howard
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Gustafsson
- Division of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Angela Hodges
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James A Timmons
- XRGenomics Ltd, London, UK.
- Division of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, King's College London, 8th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Decker B, Ostrander EA. Dysregulation of the homeobox transcription factor gene HOXB13: role in prostate cancer. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2014; 7:193-201. [PMID: 25206306 PMCID: PMC4157396 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s38117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common noncutaneous cancer in men, and epidemiological studies suggest that about 40% of PC risk is heritable. Linkage analyses in hereditary PC families have identified multiple putative loci. However, until recently, identification of specific risk alleles has proven elusive. Cooney et al used linkage mapping and segregation analysis to identify a putative risk locus on chromosome 17q21-22. In search of causative variant(s) in genes from the candidate region, a novel, potentially deleterious G84E substitution in homeobox transcription factor gene HOXB13 was observed in multiple hereditary PC families. In follow-up testing, the G84E allele was enriched in cases, especially those with an early diagnosis or positive family history of disease. This finding was replicated by others, confirming HOXB13 as a PC risk gene. The HOXB13 protein plays diverse biological roles in embryonic development and terminally differentiated tissue. In tumor cell lines, HOXB13 participates in a number of biological functions, including coactivation and localization of the androgen receptor and FOXA1. However, no consensus role has emerged and many questions remain. All HOXB13 variants with a proposed role in PC risk are predicted to damage the protein and lie in domains that are highly conserved across species. The G84E variant has the strongest epidemiological support and lies in a highly conserved MEIS protein-binding domain, which binds cofactors required for activation. On the basis of epidemiological and biological data, the G84E variant likely modulates the interaction between the HOXB13 protein and the androgen receptor, as well as affecting FOXA1-mediated transcriptional programming. However, further studies of the mutated protein are required to clarify the mechanisms by which this translates into PC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan Decker
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA ; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elaine A Ostrander
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lange EM, Johnson AM, Wang Y, Zuhlke KA, Lu Y, Ribado JV, Keele GR, Li J, Duan Q, Li G, Gao Z, Li Y, Xu J, Isaacs WB, Zheng S, Cooney KA. Genome-wide association scan for variants associated with early-onset prostate cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9:e93436. [PMID: 24740154 PMCID: PMC3989171 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer related mortality for men in the United States. There is strong empirical and epidemiological evidence supporting a stronger role of genetics in early-onset prostate cancer. We performed a genome-wide association scan for early-onset prostate cancer. Novel aspects of this study include the focus on early-onset disease (defined as men with prostate cancer diagnosed before age 56 years) and use of publically available control genotype data from previous genome-wide association studies. We found genome-wide significant (p<5×10−8) evidence for variants at 8q24 and 11p15 and strong supportive evidence for a number of previously reported loci. We found little evidence for individual or systematic inflated association findings resulting from using public controls, demonstrating the utility of using public control data in large-scale genetic association studies of common variants. Taken together, these results demonstrate the importance of established common genetic variants for early-onset prostate cancer and the power of including early-onset prostate cancer cases in genetic association studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan M. Lange
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna M. Johnson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kimberly A. Zuhlke
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Yurong Lu
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jessica V. Ribado
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Gregory R. Keele
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Qing Duan
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ge Li
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Zhengrong Gao
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - William B. Isaacs
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Siqun Zheng
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kathleen A. Cooney
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Teerlink CC, Thibodeau SN, McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Rinckleb A, Maier C, Vogel W, Cancel-Tassin G, Egrot C, Cussenot O, Foulkes WD, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Severi G, Eeles R, Easton D, Kote-Jarai Z, Guy M, Cooney KA, Ray AM, Zuhlke KA, Lange EM, Fitzgerald LM, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Wiley KE, Isaacs SD, Walsh PC, Isaacs WB, Wahlfors T, Tammela T, Schleutker J, Wiklund F, Grönberg H, Emanuelsson M, Carpten J, Bailey-Wilson J, Whittemore AS, Oakley-Girvan I, Hsieh CL, Catalona WJ, Zheng SL, Jin G, Lu L, Xu J, Camp NJ, Cannon-Albright LA. Association analysis of 9,560 prostate cancer cases from the International Consortium of Prostate Cancer Genetics confirms the role of reported prostate cancer associated SNPs for familial disease. Hum Genet 2014; 133:347-56. [PMID: 24162621 PMCID: PMC3945961 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1384-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Accepted: 10/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Previous GWAS studies have reported significant associations between various common SNPs and prostate cancer risk using cases unselected for family history. How these variants influence risk in familial prostate cancer is not well studied. Here, we analyzed 25 previously reported SNPs across 14 loci from prior prostate cancer GWAS. The International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG) previously validated some of these using a family-based association method (FBAT). However, this approach suffered reduced power due to the conditional statistics implemented in FBAT. Here, we use a case-control design with an empirical analysis strategy to analyze the ICPCG resource for association between these 25 SNPs and familial prostate cancer risk. Fourteen sites contributed 12,506 samples (9,560 prostate cancer cases, 3,368 with aggressive disease, and 2,946 controls from 2,283 pedigrees). We performed association analysis with Genie software which accounts for relationships. We analyzed all familial prostate cancer cases and the subset of aggressive cases. For the familial prostate cancer phenotype, 20 of the 25 SNPs were at least nominally associated with prostate cancer and 16 remained significant after multiple testing correction (p ≤ 1E (-3)) occurring on chromosomal bands 6q25, 7p15, 8q24, 10q11, 11q13, 17q12, 17q24, and Xp11. For aggressive disease, 16 of the SNPs had at least nominal evidence and 8 were statistically significant including 2p15. The results indicate that the majority of common, low-risk alleles identified in GWAS studies for all prostate cancer also contribute risk for familial prostate cancer, and that some may contribute risk to aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig C Teerlink
- Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kardasevic A, Delic-Redzepagic E. Qualitative approach and treatment of patients with prostate cancer in cantonal hospital bihac during two years period. Mater Sociomed 2014; 26:59-61. [PMID: 24757406 PMCID: PMC3990375 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.59-61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 01/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in human pathology. In recent years there has been an increase in the number of new cases. Material and methods: In this article, we want to show the number of patients diagnosed and treated due to prostate cancer in the Cantonal Hospital Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina, over a two year period. After examining the medical records, we selected 70 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Average age was 70.9 years (51-91 years). The total PSA ranged from 1.6 to 3332 ng/ml. For each patient is determined the PSA ratio f/t PSA, with an average value of 0.13 (0.02 to 0.627). Results: From the data analysis, we concluded that nearly half of the patients (30 patients), came to the urology clinic with advanced disease. The stage of the disease is well correlated with PSA value. Conclusion: The PSA can be considered as a reliable marker in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Regardless of the current controversy on the issue of screening on prostate cancer using the PSA analysis, we believe that the use of this simple test in selected populations is justified for the purpose of early disease detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amel Kardasevic
- Department of Urology, General hospital "dr. Irfan Ljubijankic", Bihac, Bihac Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ervin Delic-Redzepagic
- Department of Urology, General hospital "dr. Irfan Ljubijankic", Bihac, Bihac Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maitland NJ. The Future: What's in the Toolkit for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment? Prostate Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118347379.ch17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
13
|
Eeles R, Goh C, Castro E, Bancroft E, Guy M, Al Olama AA, Easton D, Kote-Jarai Z. The genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11:18-31. [PMID: 24296704 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, familial and epidemiological studies have generated considerable evidence of an inherited component to prostate cancer. Indeed, rare highly penetrant genetic mutations have been implicated. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have also identified 76 susceptibility loci associated with prostate cancer risk, which occur commonly but are of low penetrance. However, these mutations interact multiplicatively, which can result in substantially increased risk. Currently, approximately 30% of the familial risk is due to such variants. Evaluating the functional aspects of these variants would contribute to our understanding of prostate cancer aetiology and would enable population risk stratification for screening. Furthermore, understanding the genetic risks of prostate cancer might inform predictions of treatment responses and toxicities, with the goal of personalized therapy. However, risk modelling and clinical translational research are needed before we can translate risk profiles generated from these variants into use in the clinical setting for targeted screening and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Chee Goh
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elena Castro
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- Clinical Academic Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Michelle Guy
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ali Amin Al Olama
- Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Douglas Easton
- Departments of Public Health & Primary Care and Oncology, Strangeways Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The genomic landscape of prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:10822-51. [PMID: 23708091 PMCID: PMC3709705 DOI: 10.3390/ijms140610822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2013] [Revised: 05/06/2013] [Accepted: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
By the age of 80, approximately 80% of men will manifest some cancerous cells within their prostate, indicating that prostate cancer constitutes a major health burden. While this disease is clinically insignificant in most men, it can become lethal in others. The most challenging task for clinicians is developing a patient-tailored treatment in the knowledge that this disease is highly heterogeneous and that relatively little adequate prognostic tools are available to distinguish aggressive from indolent disease. Next-generation sequencing allows a description of the cancer at an unprecedented level of detail and at different levels, going from whole genome or exome sequencing to transcriptome analysis and methylation-specific immunoprecipitation, followed by sequencing. Integration of all these data is leading to a better understanding of the initiation, progression and metastatic processes of prostate cancer. Ultimately, these insights will result in a better and more personalized treatment of patients suffering from prostate cancer. The present review summarizes current knowledge on copy number changes, gene fusions, single nucleotide mutations and polymorphisms, methylation, microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs obtained from high-throughput studies.
Collapse
|
15
|
The 2013 Genetics Society of America Medal. Genetics 2013; 194:5-7. [DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.150672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
16
|
Kirkegaard P, Vedsted P, Edwards A, Fenger-Grøn M, Bro F. A cluster-randomised, parallel group, controlled intervention study of genetic prostate cancer risk assessment and use of PSA tests in general practice--the ProCaRis study: study protocol. BMJ Open 2013; 3:bmjopen-2012-002452. [PMID: 23457331 PMCID: PMC3612777 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unsystematic screening for prostate cancer (PCa) is common, causing a high number of false-positive results. Valid instruments for assessment of individual risk of PCa have been called for. A DNA-based genetic test has been tested retrospectively. The clinical use of this test needs further investigation. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact on the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests of introducing genetic PCa risk assessment in general practice. The secondary objectives are to evaluate PCa-related patient experiences, and to explore sociocultural aspects of genetic risk assessment in patients at high PCa risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study is a cluster-randomised, controlled intervention study with practice as the unit of randomisation. We expect 140 practices to accept participation and include a total of 1244 patients in 4 months. Patients requesting a PSA test in the intervention group practices will be offered a genetic PCa risk assessment. Patients requesting a PSA test in the control group practices will be handled according to current guidelines. Data will be collected from registers, patient questionnaires and interviews. Quantitative data will be analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Baseline characteristics will be compared between groups. Longitudinal analyses will include time in risk, and multivariable analysis will be conducted to evaluate the influence of general practitioner and patient-specific variables on future PSA testing. Interview data will be transcribed verbatim and analysed from a social-constructivist perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Consent will be obtained from patients who can withdraw from the study at any time. The study provides data to the ongoing conceptual and ethical discussions about genetic risk assessment and classification of low-risk and high-risk individuals. The intervention model might be applicable to other screening areas regarding risk of cancer with identified genetic components, for example, colon cancer. The study is registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01739062).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Kirkegaard
- Research Unit for General Practice & Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care-Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pelttari LM, Nurminen R, Gylfe A, Aaltonen LA, Schleutker J, Nevanlinna H. Screening of Finnish RAD51C founder mutations in prostate and colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:552. [PMID: 23176254 PMCID: PMC3522023 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare, heterozygous germline mutations in the RAD51C gene have been found in breast and ovarian cancer families. In the Finnish population, we have identified two founder mutations in RAD51C that increase the risk of ovarian cancer but not breast cancer in the absence of ovarian cancer. Risk for other cancers has not been studied. METHODS To study the role of RAD51C mutations in other common cancer types, we genotyped the Finnish RAD51C founder mutations c.837 + 1G > A and c.93delG in 1083 prostate cancer patients and 802 colorectal cancer patients using TaqMan Real-Time PCR. RESULTS No RAD51C mutations c.837 + 1G > A or c.93delG were detected among the prostate or colorectal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that the RAD51C mutations do not predispose to prostate or colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liisa M Pelttari
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Identification of functionally active, low frequency copy number variants at 15q21.3 and 12q21.31 associated with prostate cancer risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:6686-91. [PMID: 22496589 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117405109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) are a recently recognized class of human germ line polymorphisms and are associated with a variety of human diseases, including cancer. Because of the strong genetic influence on prostate cancer, we sought to identify functionally active CNVs associated with susceptibility of this cancer type. We queried low-frequency biallelic CNVs from 1,903 men of Caucasian origin enrolled in the Tyrol Prostate Specific Antigen Screening Cohort and discovered two CNVs strongly associated with prostate cancer risk. The first risk locus (P = 7.7 × 10(-4), odds ratio = 2.78) maps to 15q21.3 and overlaps a noncoding enhancer element that contains multiple activator protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor binding sites. Chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data suggested direct cis-interactions with distant genes. The second risk locus (P = 2.6 × 10(-3), odds ratio = 4.8) maps to the α-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-β-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase C (MGAT4C) gene on 12q21.31. In vitro cell-line assays found this gene to significantly modulate cell proliferation and migration in both benign and cancer prostate cells. Furthermore, MGAT4C was significantly overexpressed in metastatic versus localized prostate cancer. These two risk associations were replicated in an independent PSA-screened cohort of 800 men (15q21.3, combined P = 0.006; 12q21.31, combined P = 0.026). These findings establish noncoding and coding germ line CNVs as significant risk factors for prostate cancer susceptibility and implicate their role in disease development and progression.
Collapse
|