Imaging analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor and importins in single living cells by using GFP color variants

Structural and molecular determinants of mineralocorticoid receptor signalling

During the past decades, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) has evolved from a much-overlooked member of the steroid hormone receptor family to an important player, not only in volume and electrolyte homeostasis but also in pathological changes occurring in an increasing number of tissues, especially the renal and cardiovascular systems. Simultaneously, a wealth of information about the structure, interaction partners and chromatin requirements for genomic signalling of steroid hormone receptors became available. However, much of the information for the MR has been deduced from studies of other family members and there is still a lack of knowledge about MR-specific features in ligand binding, chromatin remodelling, co-factor interactions and general MR specificity-conferring mechanisms that can completely explain the differences in pathophysiological function between MR and its closest relative, the glucocorticoid receptor. This review aims to give an overview of the current knowledge of MR structure, signalling and co-factors modulating its activity.

Posttranslational Modifications of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Cardiovascular Aging

During aging, the cardiovascular system is especially prone to a decline in function and to life-expectancy limiting diseases. Cardiovascular aging is associated with increased arterial stiffness and vasoconstriction as well as left ventricular hypertrophy and reduced diastolic function. Pathological changes include endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, fibrosis, hypertrophy, inflammation, and changes in micromilieu with increased production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system is an important mediator of electrolyte and blood pressure homeostasis and a key contributor to pathological remodeling processes of the cardiovascular system. Its effects are partially conveyed by the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor, whose activity increases during aging and cardiovascular diseases without correlating changes of its ligand aldosterone. There is growing evidence that the MR can be enzymatically and non-enzymatically modified and that these modifications contribute to ligand-independent modulation of MR activity. Modifications reported so far include phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation and changes induced by nitrosative and oxidative stress. This review focuses on the different posttranslational modifications of the MR, their impact on MR function and degradation and the possible implications for cardiovascular aging and diseases.

Transportin-2 plays a critical role in nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of oestrogen receptor-α

Oestrogen receptor-α (ERα) shuttles continuously between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, and functions as an oestrogen-dependent transcription factor in the nucleus and as an active mediator of signalling pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, in the cytoplasm. However, little is known regarding the mechanism of ERα nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. In this study, we found that ERα is transported into the nucleus by importin-α/β1. Furthermore, we found that Transportin-2 (TNPO2) is involved in 17β-oestradiol (E2)-dependent cytoplasmic localisation of ERα. Interestingly, it was found that TNPO2 does not mediate nuclear export, but rather is involved in the cytoplasmic retention of ERα via the proline/tyrosine (PY) motifs. Moreover, we found that TNPO2 competitively binds to the basic nuclear localisation signal (NLS) of ERα with importin-α to inhibit importin-α/β-dependent ERα nuclear import. Finally, we confirmed that TNPO2 knockdown enhances the nuclear localisation of wild-type ERα and reduces PI3K/AKT phosphorylation in the presence of E2. These results reveal that TNPO2 regulates nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and cytoplasmic retention of ERα, so that ERα has precise functions depending on the stimulation.

Brain Corticosteroid Receptor Dynamics and Trafficking: Implications from Live Cell Imaging

Adrenal corticosteroids (cortisol in humans or corticosterone in rodents) exert numerous effects in the central nervous system that regulate the stress response, mood, learning and memory, and various neuroendocrine functions. Corticosterone actions in the brain are mediated by two corticosteroid receptors, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and they show a high degree of colocalization in the hippocampal region. These receptors predominantly reside in the cytoplasm without ligand and are translocated into the nucleus upon ligand binding to act as transcriptional factors. Thus, their subcellualr localizations are an important component of their biological activity. Given the differential action of MR and GR in the central nervous system, it is important to elucidate how the trafficking of these receptors between the cytoplasm and the nucleus and their interactions are regulated by ligand or other molecules to exert transcriptional activity. In this review, the authors focus on the nucleocytoplasmic and subnuclear trafficking of GR and MR in neural cells and nonneural cells and discuss various factors affecting the dynamics of these receptors.

Nuclear shuttling precedes dimerization in mineralocorticoid receptor signaling

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the steroid receptor superfamily, regulates water-electrolyte balance and mediates pathophysiological effects in the renocardiovascular system. Previously, it was assumed that after binding aldosterone, the MR dissociates from HSP90, forms homodimers, and then translocates into the nucleus where it acts as a transcription factor (Guiochon-Mantel et al., 1989; Robertson et al., 1993; Savory et al., 2001). We found that, during aldosterone-induced nuclear translocation, MR is bound to HSP90 both in the cytosol and the nucleus. Homodimerization measured by eBRET and FRET takes place when the MR is already predominantly nuclear. In vitro binding of MR to DNA was independent of ligand but could be partially inhibited by geldanamycin. Overall, here we provide insights into classical MR signaling necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of pathophysiological MR effects and MR specificity.

Rapid mineralocorticoid receptor trafficking

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that physiologically regulates water-electrolyte homeostasis and controls blood pressure. The MR can also elicit inflammatory and remodeling processes in the cardiovascular system and the kidneys, which require the presence of additional pathological factors like for example nitrosative stress. However, the underlying molecular mechanism(s) for pathophysiological MR effects remain(s) elusive. The inactive MR is located in the cytosol associated with chaperone molecules including HSP90. After ligand binding, the MR monomer rapidly translocates into the nucleus while still being associated to HSP90 and after dissociation from HSP90 binds to hormone-response-elements called glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) as a dimer. There are indications that rapid MR trafficking is modulated in the presence of high salt, oxidative or nitrosative stress, hypothetically by induction or posttranslational modifications. Additionally, glucocorticoids and the enzyme 11beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase may also influence MR activation. Because MR trafficking and its modulation by micro-milieu factors influence MR cellular localization, it is not only relevant for genomic but also for nongenomic MR effects.

Vasopressin V1a receptor is required for nucleocytoplasmic transport of mineralocorticoid receptor

We previously reported that a deficiency in the vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) results in type 4 renal tubular acidosis, which suggests that vasopressin exerts direct effects on the physiological actions of aldosterone. We investigated the role of vasopressin for nucleocytoplasmic transport of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in the intercalated cells. Vasopressin V1aR-deficient (V1aR(-/-)) mice showed largely decreased expression of MR and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11βHSD2) in the medulla of the kidney, which was partially ameliorated by fludrocortisone treatment. The incubation of IN-IC cells, an intercalated cell line established from temperature-sensitive SV40 large T antigen-expressing rats, with aldosterone or vasopressin increased the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio of the MR from 11.2 to 47.2% and from 18.7 to 61.2%, respectively, in 30 min without any changes in MR expression from the whole cell extract. The immunohistochemistry analysis of the IN-IC cells revealed the nuclear accumulation of MRs after a 30-min incubation with aldosterone or vasopressin. These effects were accompanied by an increase in regulator of chromosome condensation-1 (RCC-1) due to aldosterone and a decrease in Ran GTPase-activating protein 1 (Ran Gap1) due to vasopressin. RNA interference against V1aR abolished the nuclear accumulation of MR induced by aldosterone or vasopressin. Vasopressin increased PKCα and -β(1) expression, and aldosterone increased PKCδ and -ζ expression, but these effects were abolished with a V1aR knockdown. These results suggest that vasopressin directly regulates the nucleocytoplasmic transport of MRs via the V1aR in the intercalated cells of the collecting ducts.

Identification of permissive insertion sites for generating functional fluorescent mineralocorticoid receptors

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors, is activated by aldosterone and mediates its natriferic action in tight epithelia. MR is also expressed in nonepithelial tissues. Importantly, it mediates the deleterious effects of inappropriately high aldosterone levels in the heart, in which it induces the development of cardiac fibrosis. Antagonism of MR in humans is useful in the treatment of severe cardiac failure and some forms of hypertension. Despite the important pathophysiological and pharmacological role of this receptor, many important questions about its cellular biology and functional roles remain unanswered. A major challenge in the study of MR is the unavailability of fully functional fluorescent derivatives of the receptor. In this study we have created a library of MR mutants with insertions of the yellow fluorescent protein in various internal locations in the receptor using a random-insertion transposon-based technique. Screening of this library using a transactivation assay allowed us to identify several fluorescent constructs that retain functionality. Detailed characterization of one of these construct showed that it induces aldosterone-target genes such as the epithelial Na(+) channel subunits and the serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 at physiological concentrations of aldosterone to an equal extent than the wild-type receptor. Furthermore, aldosterone affinity, hormone-induced nuclear translocation, DNA binding and regulation of nongenomic pathways are all indistinguishable from the wild-type receptor. This new set of fluorescent MR derivatives provides a useful tool for studying the cell biology of the receptor.

On the trail of the glucocorticoid receptor: into the nucleus and back

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) belongs to the superfamily of steroid receptors and is an important regulator of physiological and metabolic processes. In its inactive state, GR is unbound by ligand and resides in the cytoplasm in a chaperone complex. When it binds glucocorticoids, it is activated and translocates to the nucleus, where it functions as a transcription factor. However, the subcellular localization of GR is determined by the balance between its rates of nuclear import and export. The mechanism of GR nuclear transport has been extensively studied. Originally, it was believed that nuclear import of GR is initiated by dissociation of the chaperone complex in the cytoplasm. However, several studies show that the chaperone machinery is required for nuclear transport of GR. In this review, we summarize the contribution of various chaperone components involved in the nuclear transport of GR and propose an updated model of its nuclear import and export. Moreover, we review the importance of ligand-independent nuclear transport and compare the nuclear transport of GR with that of other steroid receptors.

Design principles of nuclear receptor signaling: how complex networking improves signal transduction

Nuclear receptors often function in the cytoplasm.

A triple conveyor belt pumps ligand (signal) into the nucleus and onto the DNA.

The active export of importins enhances signaling to the nucleus.

Sharing a single nuclear pore may reduce rather than increase crosstalk.

Nuclear receptors (NRs) derive their family name from the early observation that they are located in the nucleus, despite responding to extracellular signals such as hormones (e.g., cortisol) (Fanestil and Edelman, 1966). According to the ‘classical' paradigm of NR signaling, the NR resides in the nucleus, attached to a DNA response element, waiting for its ligand to bind. The actual systems have multiple additional features (reviewed in Cutress et al, 2008; Cao et al, 2009; Levin, 2009a; Bunce and Campbell, 2010), such as that NRs shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Von Knethen et al, 2010) and ligand addition changes receptor location dynamically (Pratt et al, 1989; Liu and DeFranco, 2000; Kumar et al, 2004, 2006; Tanaka et al, 2005; Heitzer et al, 2007; Prüfer and Boudreaux, 2007; Ricketson et al, 2007; Cutress et al, 2008): Figure 1 summarizes the current understanding of the topology of the reaction networks involved in NR signaling, in systems biological graphical notation (SBGN), with NR activation, importin-α and -β binding, nuclear pore complex (NPC)-mediated import, recycling of importins, NR binding to target promoter sequences, exportin-mediated nuclear export of the NR, exportin cycling and free energy-driven Ran recycling. This topology is surprisingly complex when compared with the ‘classical' paradigm. To address to what extent this extra complexity is just detail or contributes essential functionality, we have simulated the dynamics of the NR transcriptional response in maximally realistic mathematical models of increasingly complex designs.

The calculations revealed significant disadvantages of the classical and simplest mechanism for endocrine NR-mediated signaling, i.e., the one with localization of the NR exclusively on the DNA (design 1 in Figure 2A): the transcriptional response was very low (Figure 2B). A high concentration of free NR in the nucleus (design 2) improved sensitivity, but made the responsiveness much slower (Figure 2B). If the NR was equally distributed between the nucleus and the cytoplasm without the NR being able to traverse the nucleocytoplasmic membrane (design 3), then, although the NR diffuses more slowly than the much smaller ligand molecule, the higher concentration of the NR increased flux from the plasma membrane to the nuclear membrane; the steady state was reached faster (Figure 2B and C; compare design 3 relative to design 2). Enabling the NR to traverse the nucleocytoplasmic membrane (design 4), further accelerated the response (Figure 2B and C).

Designs 1–4 considered the permeation of the NR through the nuclear membrane to be passive, implying an import/export activity ratio of 1. When varying the import to export activity ratio (design 5), a trade-off between the fast responsiveness of design 4 and the high sensitivity of design 2 was calculated (Figure 2B). In order to maximize responsiveness, core-NR should be concentrated in the cytoplasm, whereas to gain sensitivity, liganded NR should be concentrated in the nucleus. This suggested that performance could be improved by making nuclear import and export selective for liganded over unliganded NR (design 6; Figure 2A). Indeed, retention of core-NR in the cytoplasm provided high influx of ligand into the nucleus (Figure 2D), and also the highest concentration of ligand in the nucleus (Figure 2C): Apart from its classical receptor role in transcription regulation, the NR may function as (part of) an active pump for its ligand, resembling a triple conveyor belt: importins and exportins cycle as conveyor belts and drive the cycling of the third conveyor belt consisting of the NR that pumps ligand into the nucleus.

Two other striking features of the NR signaling network (Figure 1) are related to the facts that the energy of GTP hydrolysis is coupled to an active export of importins rather than to direct active import of NR and that the same NPC is used for all transport processes. At first sight, the former may waste free energy and the latter might cause fragility due to interferences between different NRs and other signaling pathways. However, our models show that active nuclear export of importins is a design preventing NR sequestration in the nucleus by nuclear importins and, equally paradoxically, the transport of all cargo through the same NPC makes the transport of any particular cargo robust with respect to perturbations in the availability of any other cargo.

Our calculations also predict that there is an optimal ratio of nuclear to cytoplasmic fractions of the NR (Figure 2G) that depends on the specific properties of the ligand and on the transcription activation requirements. This may help to explain the observation that different NRs have different predominant intracellular localizations. Our model calculations are thereby in line with many experimental observations, but specific cases of NR signaling may only exhibit a subset of all features. Our models can aid in identifying which subsets are important in any particular case of NR signaling, as we demonstrate for an example.

In this study, we have shown that complex networks of biochemical and signaling reactions can harbor subtle design principles that can be understood rationally in terms of simplified but not simple models (which are available to the reader).

The topology of nuclear receptor (NR) signaling is captured in a systems biological graphical notation. This enables us to identify a number of ‘design' aspects of the topology of these networks that might appear unnecessarily complex or even functionally paradoxical. In realistic kinetic models of increasing complexity, calculations show how these features correspond to potentially important design principles, e.g.: (i) cytosolic ‘nuclear' receptor may shuttle signal molecules to the nucleus, (ii) the active export of NRs may ensure that there is sufficient receptor protein to capture ligand at the cytoplasmic membrane, (iii) a three conveyor belts design dissipating GTP-free energy, greatly aids response, (iv) the active export of importins may prevent sequestration of NRs by importins in the nucleus and (v) the unspecific nature of the nuclear pore may ensure signal-flux robustness. In addition, the models developed are suitable for implementation in specific cases of NR-mediated signaling, to predict individual receptor functions and differential sensitivity toward physiological and pharmacological ligands.

The WNKs: atypical protein kinases with pleiotropic actions

WNKs are serine/threonine kinases that comprise a unique branch of the kinome. They are so-named owing to the unusual placement of an essential catalytic lysine. WNKs have now been identified in diverse organisms. In humans and other mammals, four genes encode WNKs. WNKs are widely expressed at the message level, although data on protein expression is more limited. Soon after the WNKs were identified, mutations in genes encoding WNK1 and -4 were determined to cause the human disease familial hyperkalemic hypertension (also known as pseudohypoaldosteronism II, or Gordon's Syndrome). For this reason, a major focus of investigation has been to dissect the role of WNK kinases in renal regulation of ion transport. More recently, a different mutation in WNK1 was identified as the cause of hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type II, an early-onset autosomal disease of peripheral sensory nerves. Thus the WNKs represent an important family of potential targets for the treatment of human disease, and further elucidation of their physiological actions outside of the kidney and brain is necessary. In this review, we describe the gene structure and mechanisms regulating expression and activity of the WNKs. Subsequently, we outline substrates and targets of WNKs as well as effects of WNKs on cellular physiology, both in the kidney and elsewhere. Next, consequences of these effects on integrated physiological function are outlined. Finally, we discuss the known and putative pathophysiological relevance of the WNKs.

Expression of the nuclear transport protein importin ß-1 and its association with the neurokinin 3 receptor in the rat hypothalamus following acute hyperosmotic challenge

The tachykinin NK3 receptor (NK3R) is a G-protein coupled receptor that is activated, internalized, and trafficked to the nuclei of magnocellular neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) in response to acute hyperosmolarity. The lack of information on the nuclear import pathway raises concerns about the physiological role of nuclear NK3R. NK3R contains a nuclear localizing sequence (NLS) and this raises the possibility that importins are involved in transport of NK3R through the nuclear pore complex. The following experiments utilized: (1) co-immunoprecipitation to determine if NK3R is associated with importin ß-1 following activation in response to acute hyperosmolarity in vivo, and (2) immuno-neutralization of importin ß-1 in vitro to determine if nuclear transport of NK3R was blocked. Rats were given an i.v. injection of hypertonic saline (2 M) and 10 min after the infusion, the PVN was removed and homogenized. Importin ß-1 co-immunoprecipitated with the NK3R following treatment with 2 M NaCl, but not following isotonic saline treatment. Immuno-neutralization of importin ß-1 decreased the transport of NK3R into the nuclei in a time dependent fashion. The results indicate that in response to acute hyperosmotic challenge, NK3R associates with importin ß-1 which enables the nuclear transport of NK3R. This is the first in vivo study linking importin ß-1 and the nuclear transport of a G protein coupled receptor, the NK3R, in brain.

Analysis of insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue of patients with primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of high aldosterone levels on insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue in humans.

METHODS

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was obtained from patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA; n=14) and, as controls, nonfunctioning adenoma (NFA; n=14) undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Homeostasis model assessment index was higher and potassium was lower in APA than NFA (P<0.05). Immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and real-time PCR were used to detect and quantify mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) expression. Transcript levels of peroxisome proliferative-activated receptor-gamma, insulin receptor, glucose transporter 4, insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2, leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-alpha, 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD11B) type 1, and HSD11B2 were quantified. The effect of increasing aldosterone concentrations on 2-deoxy-[3H]d-glucose uptake was tested in human sc abdominal adipocytes.

RESULTS

Expression of MR was demonstrated in VAT, with no difference between APA and NFA as to mRNA levels of MR, GRalpha, HSD11B1, and glucose metabolism and inflammation factors. In cultured adipocytes, basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were unaffected by 1-100 nM (normal/hyperaldosteronism) and impaired only by much higher, up to 10 microM, aldosterone concentrations. The impairment was prevented by RU486 but not by eplerenone.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene expression of insulin signaling/inflammatory molecules was similar in VAT of APA and NFA patients, not supporting an effect of aldosterone excess on insulin sensitivity of adipose tissues. Only at pharmacological concentrations and through GR activation, aldosterone reduced glucose uptake in adipocytes. Insulin resistance in primary aldosteronism might occur in compartments other than fat and/or depend on concurrent environmental factors.

The mineralocorticoid receptor is a constitutive nuclear factor in cardiomyocytes due to hyperactive nuclear localization signals

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor family, mediates the action of aldosterone in target epithelia, enhancing sodium reabsorption. In addition, MR may have other physiological functions in nonepithelial tissues. Altered expression or inappropriate activation of cardiac MR is directly linked to the development of cardiac fibrosis, and MR blockade is beneficial for the treatment of heart failure. However, the physiological role, activation status, and target genes of MR in the heart are poorly known. Because ligand-free steroid receptors are typically cytoplasmic and translocate to the nucleus upon ligand binding, we examined the subcellular localization of MR under different corticosteroid levels using subcellular fractionation and immunostaining. Our results demonstrate that MR is a chromatin-bound factor in mouse left ventricle and in a cultured model of cardiomyocytes, HL-1 cells, regardless of circulating corticosteroid levels. Immunohistochemical localization of MR in human heart confirms the subcellular localization pattern. Mutation of nuclear localization signals (NLSs) demonstrates that MR constitutive nuclear localization mainly depends on the synergistic contribution of NLS0 and NLS1. Constitutive nuclear localization in HL-1 cells can be reverted by cotransfection of heat shock protein 90. Heat shock protein 90 expression levels in the mouse heart and HL-1 cells are lower than those found in other tissues, suggesting that low levels of cochaperones render MR NLSs hyperactive in cardiomyocytes. Even though MR is constitutively nuclear, corticosteroids still control the transactivation properties of the receptor in a model promoter, although other MR ligand-independent activities cannot be excluded.

Regional distribution of importin subtype mRNA expression in the nervous system: study of early postnatal and adult mouse

Importin-alpha and beta1 mediate the translocation of macromolecules bearing nuclear localization signals across the nuclear pore complex. Five importin-alpha isoforms have been identified in mice and six in human. Some of these importins play an important role in neural activity such as long term potentiation, but the functional differences of each isoform in the CNS are still unclear. We performed in situ hybridization (ISH) using non-isotopic probes to clarify the expression patterns of importin-alpha subtypes (alpha5, alpha7, alpha1, alpha4, alpha3) and importin-beta1 in the mouse CNS of adult and early postnatal stages. The mRNAs of the importin-alpha subtypes and importin beta1 were expressed throughout the CNS with specific patterns; importin-alpha5, alpha7, alpha3, and beta1 showed moderate to high expression levels throughout the brain and spinal cord; importin-alpha4 showed a lack of expression in limited regions; and importin-alpha1 showed a low expression level throughout the brain and spinal cord but with a moderate expression level in the olfactory bulb and reticular system. We also demonstrated that importin-alphas and beta1 mRNAs were predominantly expressed in neurons in the adult mouse brain by using double-labeling fluorescence ISH and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, importin-alphas and beta1 mRNAs were detected throughout the CNS of postnatal mice and were highly expressed in the external granule layer of the cerebellar cortex on postnatal days 0, 4, and 10. This is the first report of importin-alphas and beta1 expression throughout the CNS of adult mice, as well as in the developing brain, including cell type specific localization.

The N-terminal nuclear localization sequences of liver X receptors alpha and beta bind to importin alpha and are essential for both nuclear import and transactivating functions

Liver X receptors (LXRs) alpha and beta are nuclear receptors, which form obligate heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). The LXRs regulate both redundantly and non-redundantly the transcription of genes controlling cholesterol metabolism and transport as well as lipogenesis. Previously, we showed that mutations in putative N-terminal nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) within both LXRs inhibit nuclear import. Through in vitro studies, we show here that these NLSs bind importin alpha and are both necessary and sufficient for the nuclear import of LXRs. Imaging, transactivation, and electro-mobility shift experiments show that RXR rescues the nuclear import of the LXRalpha NLS mutant yet does not restore its transcriptional activity despite intact DNA binding. In contrast, RXR partially rescues the import of the LXRbeta NLS mutant, but has no effect on its transcriptional activity due to the loss of DNA binding. Experiments with NLS mutant RXR confirmed that RXR may dominate the nuclear import of the RXR/LXRalpha heterodimer, whereas LXRbeta dominates the nuclear import of the RXR/LXRbeta heterodimer. Intriguingly, our data indicate differences between LXRalpha and LXRbeta in their interaction with RXR and in the role their NLSs play in transactivating functions independent of nuclear import.

Steroid receptor signalling in the brain--lessons learned from molecular imaging

Studies with green fluorescent protein (GFP) have revealed the subcellular distribution of many steroid hormone receptors to be much more dynamic than previously thought. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are powerful techniques with which to examine protein-protein interaction and the mobility of tagged proteins, respectively. FRET analysis revealed that steroid treatment (with corticosterone or testosterone) induces direct interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and importin alpha in the cytoplasm and that, shortly after nuclear entry, the GR detaches from importin alpha. The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and androgen receptor (AR) show the same trafficking. Upon oestradiol treatment, ERalpha and ERbeta in the same cell are relocalised to form a discrete pattern and are localised in the same discrete cluster (subnuclear foci). FRAP analysis showed that nuclear ERalpha and ERbeta are most dynamic and mobile in the absence of the ligand, and that mobility decreases slightly after ligand treatment. Genomic as well as non-genomic actions of steroid hormones influence the cellular function of target tissues spacio-temporally.

A high-content glucocorticoid receptor translocation assay for compound mechanism-of-action evaluation

Ligand-induced cytoplasm to nucleus translocation is a critical event in the nuclear receptor (NR) signal transduction cascade. The development of green fluorescent proteins and their color variants fused with NRs, along with the recent developments in automated cellular imaging technologies, has provided unique tools to monitor and quantify the NR translocation events. These technology developments have important implications in the mechanistic evaluation of NR signaling and provide a powerful tool for drug discovery. The unique challenges for developing a robust NR translocation assay include cytotoxicity accompanied with chronic overexpression of NRs, basal translocation induced by serum present in culture medium, and interference from endogenous NRs, as well as subcellular dynamics. The authors have developed a robust assay system for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) that was applied to a panel of nuclear receptor ligands. Using a high-content imaging system, ligand-induced, dose-dependent GR nuclear translocation was quantified and a correlation with other conventional assays established.

Nuclear localization of liver X receptor α and β is differentially regulated

Activity of nuclear receptors is regulated by their nuclear localization. Liver X receptors (LXR) alpha and beta are nuclear receptors that regulate transcription of genes for cholesterol metabolism, cholesterol transport, and lipogenesis. While LXR alpha and beta are very similar in structure and exhibit similar ligand binding properties, their physiological roles are quite different. Since the LXRs fall into a class of receptors that move between the nucleus and cytoplasm, experiments were conducted to determine whether LXR alpha and LXR beta show differences in their nuclear localization pattern. To determine the location of each receptor, cell lines stably expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) chimeras with either LXR alpha or LXR beta were examined. Retention in the nucleus of the chimeric proteins in the presence or absence of ligands was assessed using fluorescence microscopy coupled with digitonin permeabilization assays. Surprisingly, differences were found between LXR alpha and LXR beta. Whereas unliganded LXR alpha was retained in the nucleus, unliganded LXR beta was partially exported. Mutations were then introduced into putative nuclear localization sequences (NLS) to determine which sequences are important for nuclear localization and function. Mutation in one such sequence abolished nuclear localization of LXR alpha, whereas the analogous change in LXR beta had a much less dramatic effect. Mutations in analogous putative NLS also differentially affected transcriptional activation by LXR alpha and LXR beta. These data demonstrate for the first time that nuclear retention and localization as well as function of LXR alpha and LXR beta are differentially regulated.