1
|
Triplett G, Buckley TN, Muir CD. Amphistomy increases leaf photosynthesis more in coastal than montane plants of Hawaiian 'ilima (Sida fallax). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY 2024; 111:e16284. [PMID: 38351495 DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PREMISE The adaptive significance of amphistomy (stomata on both upper and lower leaf surfaces) is unresolved. A widespread association between amphistomy and open, sunny habitats suggests the adaptive benefit of amphistomy may be greatest in these contexts, but this hypothesis has not been tested experimentally. Understanding amphistomy informs its potential as a target for crop improvement and paleoenvironment reconstruction. METHODS We developed a method to quantify "amphistomy advantage" (AA $\text{AA}$ ) as the log-ratio of photosynthesis in an amphistomatous leaf to that of the same leaf but with gas exchange blocked through the upper surface (pseudohypostomy). Humidity modulated stomatal conductance and thus enabled comparing photosynthesis at the same total stomatal conductance. We estimatedAA $\text{AA}$ and leaf traits in six coastal (open, sunny) and six montane (closed, shaded) populations of the indigenous Hawaiian species 'ilima (Sida fallax). RESULTS Coastal 'ilima leaves benefit 4.04 times more from amphistomy than montane leaves. Evidence was equivocal with respect to two hypotheses: (1) that coastal leaves benefit more because they are thicker and have lower CO2 conductance through the internal airspace and (2) that they benefit more because they have similar conductance on each surface, as opposed to most conductance being through the lower surface. CONCLUSIONS This is the first direct experimental evidence that amphistomy increases photosynthesis, consistent with the hypothesis that parallel pathways through upper and lower mesophyll increase CO2 supply to chloroplasts. The prevalence of amphistomatous leaves in open, sunny habitats can partially be explained by the increased benefit of amphistomy in "sun" leaves, but the mechanistic basis remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Triplett
- School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA
| | - Thomas N Buckley
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Christopher D Muir
- School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA
- Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cerca J, Cotoras DD, Bieker VC, De-Kayne R, Vargas P, Fernández-Mazuecos M, López-Delgado J, White O, Stervander M, Geneva AJ, Guevara Andino JE, Meier JI, Roeble L, Brée B, Patiño J, Guayasamin JM, Torres MDL, Valdebenito H, Castañeda MDR, Chaves JA, Díaz PJ, Valente L, Knope ML, Price JP, Rieseberg LH, Baldwin BG, Emerson BC, Rivas-Torres G, Gillespie R, Martin MD. Evolutionary genomics of oceanic island radiations. Trends Ecol Evol 2023:S0169-5347(23)00032-0. [PMID: 36870806 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
A recurring feature of oceanic archipelagos is the presence of adaptive radiations that generate endemic, species-rich clades that can offer outstanding insight into the links between ecology and evolution. Recent developments in evolutionary genomics have contributed towards solving long-standing questions at this interface. Using a comprehensive literature search, we identify studies spanning 19 oceanic archipelagos and 110 putative adaptive radiations, but find that most of these radiations have not yet been investigated from an evolutionary genomics perspective. Our review reveals different gaps in knowledge related to the lack of implementation of genomic approaches, as well as undersampled taxonomic and geographic areas. Filling those gaps with the required data will help to deepen our understanding of adaptation, speciation, and other evolutionary processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Cerca
- Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Darko D Cotoras
- Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
| | - Vanessa C Bieker
- Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rishi De-Kayne
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK
| | - Pablo Vargas
- Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico, 28014 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Fernández-Mazuecos
- Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (CIBC-UAM), Calle Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia López-Delgado
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Oliver White
- Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
| | - Martin Stervander
- Bird Group, Natural History Museum, Akeman Street, Tring, Hertfordshire HP23 6AP, UK
| | - Anthony J Geneva
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Juan Ernesto Guevara Andino
- Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Joana Isabel Meier
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Lizzie Roeble
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Box 11103, 9700, 5 CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Baptiste Brée
- Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (UPPA), Energy Environment Solutions (E2S), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico-Chimie pour l'Environnement et les Matériaux (IPREM), 64000 Pau, France
| | - Jairo Patiño
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología (IPNA-CSIC), Calle Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez 3, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, 38206, Spain
| | - Juan M Guayasamin
- Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto Biósfera, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Cumbayá, 170901 Quito, Ecuador; Galapagos Science Center, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, San Cristobal, Galapagos, Ecuador
| | - María de Lourdes Torres
- Laboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Cumbayá, Quito, Ecuador; Galapagos Science Center, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, San Cristobal, Galapagos, Ecuador
| | - Hugo Valdebenito
- Galapagos Science Center, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, San Cristobal, Galapagos, Ecuador; Herbarium of Economic Botany of Ecuador (Herabario QUSF), Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Cumbayá, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Jaime A Chaves
- Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA; Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto Biósfera, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Cumbayá, 170901 Quito, Ecuador
| | - Patricia Jaramillo Díaz
- Estación Científica Charles Darwin, Fundación Charles Darwin, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador; Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Luis Valente
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Box 11103, 9700, 5 CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew L Knope
- Department of Biology, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, 200 West Kawili Street, Hilo, 96720, HI, USA
| | - Jonathan P Price
- Department of Biology, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, 200 West Kawili Street, Hilo, 96720, HI, USA
| | - Loren H Rieseberg
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bruce G Baldwin
- Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building 2465, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465, USA
| | - Brent C Emerson
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología (IPNA-CSIC), La Laguna, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Rivas-Torres
- Estación Científica Charles Darwin, Fundación Charles Darwin, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador; Estación de Biodiversidad Tiputini, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Rosemary Gillespie
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Michael D Martin
- Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fletcher LR, Cui H, Callahan H, Scoffoni C, John GP, Bartlett MK, Burge DO, Sack L. Evolution of leaf structure and drought tolerance in species of Californian Ceanothus. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY 2018; 105:1672-1687. [PMID: 30368798 DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY Studies across diverse species have established theory for the contribution of leaf traits to plant drought tolerance. For example, species in more arid climates tend to have smaller leaves of higher vein density, higher leaf mass per area, and more negative osmotic potential at turgor loss point (πTLP ). However, few studies have tested these associations for species within a given lineage that have diversified across an aridity gradient. METHODS We analyzed the anatomy and physiology of 10 Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) species grown in a common garden for variation between and within "wet" and "dry" subgenera (Ceanothus and Cerastes, respectively) and analyzed a database for 35 species for leaf size and leaf mass per area (LMA). We used a phylogenetic generalized least squares approach to test hypothesized relationships among traits, and of traits with climatic aridity in the native range. We also tested for allometric relationships among anatomical traits. KEY RESULTS Leaf form, anatomy, and drought tolerance varied strongly among species within and between subgenera. Cerastes species had specialized anatomy including hypodermis and encrypted stomata that may confer superior water storage and retention. The osmotic potentials at turgor loss point (πTLP ) and full turgor (πo ) showed evolutionary correlations with the aridity index (AI) and precipitation of the 10 species' native distributions, and LMA with potential evapotranspiration for the 35 species in the larger database. We found an allometric correlation between upper and lower epidermal cell wall thicknesses, but other anatomical traits diversified independently. CONCLUSIONS Leaf traits and drought tolerance evolved within and across lineages of Ceanothus consistently with climatic distributions. The πTLP has signal to indicate the evolution of drought tolerance within small clades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila R Fletcher
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Hongxia Cui
- Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China
| | - Hilary Callahan
- Biology Department, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Christine Scoffoni
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
| | - Grace P John
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Megan K Bartlett
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Dylan O Burge
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Lawren Sack
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|