Trends in Research Literature Describing Dysphagia in Motor Neuron Diseases (MND): A Scoping Review

Estimating the Incidence and Prevalence of Dysphagia in New Zealand

Dysphagia imposes a substantial economic burden on global healthcare systems due to its pervasive, high-cost nature. To comprehend this burden, we must first assess dysphagia's prevalence and incidence in the general population. Existing studies on dysphagia prevalence encompass minor symptoms, while it is the severe cases that drive significant healthcare costs. We address this knowledge gap by estimating dysphagia incidence and prevalence in the New Zealand population, projecting future demographics of affected individuals. Incidence and prevalence rates of dysphagia within specific underlying medical conditions are sourced from existing literature. Median projected population estimates from Statistics New Zealand, by age, sex, and ethnicity are used to calculate dysphagia projections. Where possible, projections by age and ethnicity are provided until 2038 and projections by age and sex until 2073. In 2020, 9300 New Zealanders are estimated to have newly developed dysphagia while 1.5% of the general New Zealand population are estimated to have been living with the effects of the condition. By 2073, the number of individuals newly diagnosed annually is projected to increase to 24,500 and the prevalence of dysphagia is projected to increase to 2.6%. These results indicate that a significant number of New Zealanders are impacted by dysphagia. This number is predicted to dramatically increase in the future, mostly due to population ageing, indicating an increased burden on society and healthcare systems. Our work provides a useful starting point for countries worldwide to assess future healthcare resource demands associated with dysphagia, assisting with healthcare provision planning.

Functional Lingual Pressure Thresholds for Swallowing Safety and Efficiency Impairments in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Although reductions in lingual strength are reported in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that are associated with dysphagia; determination of a functional lingual pressure threshold (FLPT) has not yet been established. The present study therefore sought to identify an FLPT for impaired swallowing safety and efficiency in individuals with ALS.Thirty individuals with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination and maximum anterior isometric lingual pressure testing using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Duplicate, blinded ratings of the validated Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores and Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) were performed. Binary classifications of safety (unsafe: PAS: ≥ 3) and efficiency (inefficient: ≥ 3% worst total pharyngeal residue) were derived. Descriptives and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) were performed.Unsafe and inefficient swallowing were instrumentally confirmed in 57% and 70% of ALS patients, respectively. Across the entire cohort, the mean maximum lingual physiologic capacity was 32.1 kilopascals ('kPa'; SD: 18.1 kPa). The identified FLPT for radiographically confirmed unsafe swallowing was 43 kPa (sensitivity: 94%, specificity: 62%, AUC 0.82, p = 0.003). FLPT for inefficient swallowing was 46 kPa (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 56%, AUC = 0.77, p = 0.02).These data provide preliminary FLPT data in a small cohort of individuals with ALS that need to be further investigated in larger cohorts to inform clinical screening practices.

Maximum lingual pressure impacts both swallowing safety and efficiency in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Although reduced lingual strength is a confirmed early manifestation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), its functional impact on swallowing remains unclear. We therefore sought to examine relationships between maximum anterior isometric lingual pressure (MAIP) with swallowing safety, swallowing efficiency, and swallowing timing metrics in a large cohort of individuals with ALS.

METHODS

Ninety-seven participants with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination (VF) and lingual pressure testing (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). Duplicate and blinded ratings of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) percent efficiency (%C2-C42 ) and timing (laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC) duration: amount of time (milliseconds, msec) between LVC onset and laryngeal vestibule opening; time-to-LVC: hyoid burst to onset of LVC (msec); and swallow reaction time: interval between bolus passing ramus of mandible and onset of LVC (msec)) were performed across bolus trials. Swallowing safety (safe PAS: 1, 2, 4; unsafe PAS: 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8) and efficiency (inefficient: ≥3% worst total residue) were derived. Statistical analyses including descriptives, binary logistic regressions, and Spearman's rho correlations were performed (α = 0.05).

KEY RESULTS

Mean MAIP was 36.3 kPa (SD: 18.7). Mean MAIP was higher in those with safe swallowing as compared to those who penetrated (mean difference: 12 kPa) or aspirated (mean difference: 18 kPa). Individuals with efficient swallowing demonstrated higher MAIP than those with inefficient swallowing (mean difference: 11 kPa). Binary logistic regression analyses revealed increasing MAIP was significantly associated with a 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03-1.09) and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06) greater odds of safe and efficient swallowing, respectively. No relationships were observed between MAIP and swallow reaction time across all bolus trials. Longer time-to-LVC (5 ml thin liquid: rs  = -0.35, p = 0.002; cup sip thin liquid: rs  = -0.26, p = 0.02; moderately thick liquid: rs  = -0.28, p = 0.01) and prolonged LVC duration (cup sip thin liquid, rs  = -0.34, p = 0.003) were associated with lower MAIP.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Reduced lingual strength was confirmed in this group of 97 individuals with ALS that was associated with a diminished ability to effectively transport boluses and aide in laryngeal vestibule closure to prevent entry of material into the airway.

Emergencies cards for neuromuscular disorders 1st Consensus Meeting from UILDM - Italian Muscular Dystrophy Association Workshop report

Acute hospitalisation may be required to support patients with Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) mainly experiencing respiratory complications, swallowing difficulties, heart failure, urgent surgical procedures. As NMDs may need specific treatments, they should be ideally managed in specialized hospitals. Nevertheless, if urgent treatment is required, patients with NMD should be managed at the closest hospital site, which may not be a specialized centre where local emergency physicians have the adequate experience to manage these patients. Although NMDs are a group of conditions that can differ in terms of disease onset, progression, severity and involvement of other systems, many recommendations are transversal and apply to the most frequent NMDs. Emergency Cards (EC), which report the most common recommendations on respiratory and cardiac issues and provide indications for drugs/treatments to be used with caution, are actively used in some countries by patients with NMDs. In Italy, there is no consensus on the use of any EC, and a minority of patients adopt it regularly in case of emergency. In April 2022, 50 participants from different centres in Italy met in Milan, Italy, to agree on a minimum set of recommendations for urgent care management which can be extended to the vast majority of NMDs. The aim of the workshop was to agree on the most relevant information and recommendations regarding the main topics related to emergency care of patients with NMD in order to produce specific ECs for the 13 most frequent NMDs.

A Strength Endurance Exercise Paradigm Mitigates Deficits in Hypoglossal-Tongue Axis Function, Strength, and Structure in a Rodent Model of Hypoglossal Motor Neuron Degeneration

The tongue plays a crucial role in the swallowing process, and impairment can lead to dysphagia, particularly in motor neuron diseases (MNDs) resulting in hypoglossal-tongue axis degeneration (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive bulbar palsy). This study utilized our previously established inducible rodent model of dysphagia due to targeted degeneration of the hypoglossal-tongue axis. This model was created by injecting cholera toxin B conjugated to saporin (CTB-SAP) into the genioglossus muscle of the tongue base for retrograde transport to the hypoglossal (XII) nucleus via the hypoglossal nerve, which provides the sole motor control of the tongue. Our goal was to investigate the effect of high-repetition/low-resistance tongue exercise on tongue function, strength, and structure in four groups of male rats: (1) control + sham exercise (n = 13); (2) control + exercise (n = 10); (3) CTB-SAP + sham exercise (n = 13); and (4) CTB-SAP + exercise (n = 12). For each group, a custom spout with adjustable lick force requirement for fluid access was placed in the home cage overnight on days 4 and 6 post-tongue injection. For the two sham exercise groups, the lick force requirement was negligible. For the two exercise groups, the lick force requirement was set to ∼40% greater than the maximum voluntary lick force for individual rats. Following exercise exposure, we evaluated the effect on hypoglossal-tongue axis function (via videofluoroscopy), strength (via force-lickometer), and structure [via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brainstem and tongue in a subset of rats]. Results showed that sham-exercised CTB-SAP rats had significant deficits in lick rate, swallow timing, and lick force. In exercised CTB-SAP rats, lick rate and lick force were preserved; however, swallow timing deficits persisted. MRI revealed corresponding degenerative changes in the hypoglossal-tongue axis that were mitigated by tongue exercise. These collective findings suggest that high-repetition/low-resistance tongue exercise in our model is a safe and effective treatment to prevent/diminish signs of hypoglossal-tongue axis degeneration. The next step is to leverage our rat model to optimize exercise dosing parameters and investigate corresponding treatment mechanisms of action for future translation to MND clinical trials.

Predicting dysphagia onset in patients with ALS: the ALS dysphagia risk score

Purpose: For patients diagnosed with ALS, dysphagia can result in aspiration, malnutrition, and mortality. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model capable of identifying patients with ALS at imminent risk for developing swallowing complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Database (PRO-ACT) was conducted. After dividing the PRO-ACT database into development and validation cohorts with dysphagia defined from the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS), a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model estimated the probability of dysphagia at 3, 6, and 12-months with subsequent evaluation of model discrimination and calibration. Results: With 2057 participants in the development cohort and 1891 in the validation cohort, the Cox model included 7 clinical variables: spinal-onset; bulbar, fine and gross motor ALSFRS subscale scores; respiratory impairment; functional progression rate; and time from diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of dysphagia was 18% at 3-months, 29% at 6-months, and 45% at 12-months. The mean predicted probability of dysphagia development ranged from 4.5% in the bottommost risk decile to 40% in the topmost decile at 3 months, 10%-72% at 6 months, and 25%-93% at 12 months. In the validation cohort, the model had good discrimination and calibration with an optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.70 and calibration slope of 0.96. Conclusions: The ALS dysphagia risk score can be used to identify patients with ALS at high risk for self-reported dysphagia development who would benefit from a comprehensive swallowing assessment and proactive dysphagia management strategies.

European Survey: Dysphagia Management in Patients with Neuromuscular Diseases

Dysphagia is common in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). Its management differs by country and clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to describe current practices in the management of dysphagia in NMDs across Europe. An online survey of sixteen questions was developed, including basic information on facilities, existence of a management protocol, availability of dedicated therapists, tools used during screening, assessment, treatment stages, and treatment strategies. The survey was rolled out to European healthcare facilities providing care for NMDs. A total of 140 facilities across 25 European countries completed the survey. Substantial discrepancies in dysphagia management were identified among respondents. Seventy-two percent of the facilities reported having a protocol for at least one of the three management stages whereas only 39% had one for all. Speech and language therapists were reported as involved throughout the entire management stage while participation of other members from multidisciplinary teams varied depending on the stage. Clinical swallowing assessment was the most frequently reported tool in the assessment and treatment stages. For screening, questionnaires were the most frequently used while instrumental examinations were mainly reported in the assessment stage. For the treatment stage, adaptation strategies (diet, food, and posture) were the most reported approaches. In conclusion, the survey highlighted the absence of a defined protocol concerning the management of dysphagia in most of the surveyed healthcare facilities. Standardized training strategies and guidelines are necessary in the future to familiarize clinicians with each stage of the management of dysphagia.

Use of Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry to Evaluate Dysphagia in Adults with Motor Neurone Disease: A Scoping Review

There has been a recent shift towards proactive dysphagia intervention in motor neurone disease (MND) to maintain physiological reserve. Pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (PHRM) can quantify swallowing pathophysiology to inform and evaluate proactive dysphagia intervention. This study aims to explore the current use of PHRM as a dysphagia evaluation in adults with MND. A scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Framework was completed. Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science core) were searched (inception to March 2021) by two independent researchers. Data were analysed according to (i) PHRM protocol and analysis methods and the feasibility of same, (ii) swallow biomechanics data and (iii) dysphagia intervention effects as measured by PHRM. Six studies with 78 people with MND (PwMND) were included. There was considerable variation in PHRM protocol and analysis methods. Five studies reported a 100% completion rate and three studies reported no adverse events. Swallow biomechanics data were reported across all studies. The effects of sensory stimulation, increased bolus consistency, effortful swallow and cricopharyngeal myotomy were evaluated using PHRM with 20 PwMND across four studies with varying effects. Literature on the use of PHRM in PwMND is limited. Variability in PHRM methods restricts comparison of metrics. PHRM appears to be a feasible tool for PwMND. PHRM can provide novel swallow physiology data in PwMND and quantify discrete effects of compensatory and surgical dysphagia interventions not detectable by videofluoroscopy or FEES. Further research on the effects of proactive dysphagia intervention as measured by PHRM is required.

The neuropalliative multidisciplinary team-Members and their roles

Neurodegenerative conditions are prominent contributors to both morbidity and mortality worldwide. They pose a significant challenge to health professionals, health systems, and the often unpaid, untrained family members and carers. The many and varied challenges encountered are best managed by a multidisciplinary neuropalliative team, as it is impossible for a single clinician to possess and deliver the wide range of skills and services required to optimally care for these patients. This chapter discusses the assembly, maintenance, and care of such a team, as well as potential difficulties and solutions in domains such as funding, training, geographical remoteness, as well as the potential lack of awareness and acceptance by colleagues. A comprehensive description of the role of all possible team members is discussed. The chapter outlines the concept, content, and potential benefits of a multidisciplinary team in neuropalliative care. Its thesis is twofold: that multidisciplinary care is vital and, second, that the sum of the whole of a team can be greater than the individual parts with respect to organization, planning, experience, and creativity of approach. With all these factors considered, and implemented wherever possible, we may all move closer to optimizing the comfort and care of our shared neuropalliative patients.

Tongue measurements and pharyngeal residue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Aim: We aimed to analyze the relationship between tongue measurements and vallecular residue in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Materials & methods: Twenty-one patients with ALS were assessed for posterior maximum tongue isometric pressure (PMTIP) and posterior tongue isometric endurance (PTIE) by the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument; vallecular residue after 10 ml of moderately thickened consistency by Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing; and tongue thickness (TT) by ultrasonography. Results: PMTIP, PTIE and TT were decreased compared with the reference values for healthy individuals and were not different between patients with and without vallecular residue. Conclusion: In ALS, PMTIP, PTIE and TT are not good predictors of vallecular residue in the tested volume and food consistency.

Aspiration Screening in Motor Neuron Disease: Preliminary Results From Utilization of the Yale Swallow Protocol

Purpose Dysphagia is a common symptom experienced by patients with motor neuron disease (MND). The Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP) is a validated screening instrument for identifying patients at risk for aspiration. The purpose of this exploratory cross-sectional, multicenter study was to investigate how the YSP results in identifying aspiration risk in patients with MND in comparison with aspiration observed during a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). Method Participants referred for VFSS as part of clinical management were recruited from four specialized MND clinics. All participants were administered the YSP immediately prior to the VFSS by a speech-language pathologist, with results recorded as pass or fail. Aspiration on VFSS was determined using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (scores 6-8). A 2 × 2 contingency table was constructed to compare results of YSP with those on VFSS. Results Thirty-one patients with MND (13 males, 18 females; M _age = 64 ± 12 years) referred for VFSS participated in this study. Of the 22 patients who failed the YSP, interrupted drinking was the most frequent reason (65%). Compared to the VFSS, the YSP yielded a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 33%, positive predictive value of 36%, and negative predictive value of 78%. Conclusions The YSP is a simple tool and easy to utilize and has a high sensitivity in identifying aspiration risk in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A future investigation with a larger sample size is needed to better investigate the utility of YSP as a screening tool for this population.

Characterizing Swallows From People With Neurodegenerative Diseases Using High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals and Temporal and Spatial Swallow Kinematic Measurements

Purpose The prevalence of dysphagia in patients with neurodegenerative diseases (ND) is alarmingly high and frequently results in morbidity and accelerated mortality due to subsequent adverse events (e.g., aspiration pneumonia). Swallowing in patients with ND should be continuously monitored due to the progressive disease nature. Access to instrumental swallow evaluations can be challenging, and limited studies have quantified changes in temporal/spatial swallow kinematic measures in patients with ND. High-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA), a dysphagia screening method, has accurately differentiated between safe and unsafe swallows, identified swallow kinematic events (e.g., laryngeal vestibule closure [LVC]), and classified swallows between healthy adults and patients with ND. This study aimed to (a) compare temporal/spatial swallow kinematic measures between patients with ND and healthy adults and (b) investigate HRCA's ability to annotate swallow kinematic events in patients with ND. We hypothesized there would be significant differences in temporal/spatial swallow measurements between groups and that HRCA would accurately annotate swallow kinematic events in patients with ND. Method Participants underwent videofluoroscopic swallowing studies with concurrent HRCA. We used linear mixed models to compare temporal/spatial swallow measurements (n = 170 ND patient swallows, n = 171 healthy adult swallows) and deep learning machine-learning algorithms to annotate specific temporal and spatial kinematic events in swallows from patients with ND. Results Differences (p < .05) were found between groups for several temporal and spatial swallow kinematic measures. HRCA signal features were used as input to machine-learning algorithms and annotated upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening, UES closure, LVC, laryngeal vestibule reopening, and hyoid bone displacement with 66.25%, 85%, 68.18%, 70.45%, and 44.6% accuracy, respectively, compared to human judges' measurements. Conclusion This study demonstrates HRCA's potential in characterizing swallow function in patients with ND and other patient populations.

Swallowing Safety and Efficiency Impairment Profiles in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Dysphagia is common in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and associated with reductions in quality of life and health-related outcomes. Despite the high prevalence of dysphagia in ALS, functional impairment profiles of swallowing safety and efficiency have not been comprehensively examined. We therefore aimed to determine the relative prevalence of unsafe and inefficient swallowing in a large cohort of individuals with ALS. We further sought to examine the impact of global and bulbar disease progression (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised "ALSFRS-R" total and bulbar scores, respectively), disease duration, and onset type on swallowing impairment profiles. One hundred individuals with ALS completed a standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing examination Two independent and blinded raters performed validated ratings of safety (Penetration-Aspiration Scale, PAS) and efficiency (Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics, and Timing, ASPEKT % residue). Binary classifications of safety (unsafe: PAS ≥ 3), efficiency (inefficient: total residue ≥ 3% of C2-4²) and global swallowing status were derived. The ALSFRS-R was completed to derive ALSFRS-R total and bulbar subscale scores. Demographic data (disease duration and onset type) for each participant was also recorded.  Descriptives, 2 × 2 contingency tables with Fishers exact test, and independent samples t-tests were performed (α = 0.05). Prevalence of unsafe and inefficient swallowing was 48% and 73%, respectively. Global swallowing profiles were, in rank order: unsafe and inefficient (39%), inefficient but safe (34%), safe and efficient (18%), and unsafe but efficient (9%). There were no differences in global disease progression or disease duration across swallowing impairment profiles. ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale scores were significantly lower in unsafe versus safe swallowers, p < 0.05. Spinal onset patients had a greater proportion of safe swallowers as compared to bulbar onset patients (p = 0.000, Fisher's exact test). Both spinal and bulbar onset patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of inefficient swallowers as compared to efficient swallowers (p = 0.04, Fisher's exact test). Dysphagia was prevalent in this group of individuals with ALS. Approximately half demonstrated safety impairments and two-thirds had impairments in swallowing efficiency. Inefficient swallowing was approximately four times more likely to be the initial functional impairment in patients with one pathophysiologic functional impairment. A longitudinal study is needed to examine the temporal evolution of dysphagia in ALS.

Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adult patients with neuromuscular diseases using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). Its early recognition is vital for proper management. We tested a large cohort of adult NMD patients for oropharyngeal dysphagia using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). We also looked for possible differences in characteristics of oropharyngeal dysphagia in various NMD groups and diseases. Finally, we compared results of this screening with those from their corresponding medical records for eventual "clinical history" of dysphagia.

METHODS

We asked patients to fill in the SSQ during follow-up outpatient visits at our neuromuscular reference center. A total score above the cutoff score of 118.5 out of 1700 was indicative of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

RESULTS

Of the 304 adult patients assessed for eligibility, 201 NMD patients (96 women and 105 men, aged 49.0 ± 16.2 years) were included and tested in this study. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was detected in 45% of all the NMD patients when using the SSQ, whereas only 12% had a positive medical record for dysphagia. The median SSQ scores for patients with myotonic syndromes (including myotonic dystrophy type 1), with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy were above the cutoff score. The SSQ scores obtained revealed distinct oropharyngeal dysphagia characteristics in the different NMD groups and diseases.

DISCUSSION

The SSQ tests positively for oropharyngeal dysphagia in a higher proportion of NMD patients compared with their medical records. The distinct oropharyngeal dysphagia characteristics we revealed in different NMD groups and diseases may help to elaborate adapted clinical approaches in the management of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

The cumulative incidence of dysphagia and dysphagia-free survival in persons diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Dysphagia worsens mortality and quality of life for persons diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet our understanding of its incidence and timing remains limited. In this study we sought to estimate dysphagia incidence and dysphagia-free survival over time.

METHODS

Using data from the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Database, we compared characteristics of persons with and without dysphagia upon study entry. To account for competing mortality risk, we used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate the cumulative incidence of dysphagia and the median number of days until the development of dysphagia or death in those without dysphagia at study entry.

RESULTS

Patients with dysphagia upon study entry were more likely to have bulbar onset and had faster rates of functional decline and shorter diagnostic delays. The cumulative incidence of new-onset dysphagia was 44% at 1 year and 64% at 2 years after trial enrollment for those with spinal onset, and 85% and 92% for those with bulbar onset. The median duration of dysphagia-free survival after trial enrollment was 11.5 months for those with spinal onset and 3.2 months for those with bulbar onset.

DISCUSSION

Our findings underscore the high risk for dysphagia development and support the need for early dysphagia referral and evaluation to minimize the risk of serious dysphagia-related complications.

A Nation-Wide, Multi-Center Study on the Quality of Life of ALS Patients in Germany

Improving quality of life (QoL) is central to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treatment. This Germany-wide, multicenter cross-sectional study analyses the impact of different symptom-specific treatments and ALS variants on QoL. Health-related QoL (HRQoL) in 325 ALS patients was assessed using the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 (ALSAQ-5) and EuroQol Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L), together with disease severity (captured by the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)) and the current care and therapies used by our cohort. At inclusion, the mean ALSAQ-5 total score was 56.93 (max. 100, best = 0) with a better QoL associated with a less severe disease status (β = −1.96 per increase of one point in the ALSFRS-R score, p < 0.001). “Limb-onset” ALS (lALS) was associated with a better QoL than “bulbar-onset” ALS (bALS) (mean ALSAQ-5 total score 55.46 versus 60.99, p = 0.040). Moreover, with the ALSFRS-R as a covariate, using a mobility aid (β = −7.60, p = 0.001), being tracheostomized (β = −14.80, p = 0.004) and using non-invasive ventilation (β = −5.71, p = 0.030) were associated with an improved QoL, compared to those at the same disease stage who did not use these aids. In contrast, antidepressant intake (β = 5.95, p = 0.007), and increasing age (β = 0.18, p = 0.023) were predictors of worse QoL. Our results showed that the ALSAQ-5 was better-suited for ALS patients than the EQ-5D-5L. Further, the early and symptom-specific clinical management and supply of assistive devices can significantly improve the individual HRQoL of ALS patients. Appropriate QoL questionnaires are needed to monitor the impact of treatment to provide the best possible and individualized care.

Tongue and hypoglossal morphology after intralingual cholera toxin B-saporin injection

INTRODUCTION

We recently developed an inducible model of dysphagia using intralingual injection of cholera toxin B conjugated to saporin (CTB-SAP) to cause death of hypoglossal neurons. In this study we aimed to evaluate tongue morphology and ultrastructural changes in hypoglossal neurons and nerve fibers in this model.

METHODS

Tissues were collected from 20 rats (10 control and 10 CTB-SAP animals) on day 9 post-injection. Tongues were weighed, measured, and analyzed for microscopic changes using laminin immunohistochemistry. Hypoglossal neurons and axons were examined using transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional area of myofibers in the posterior genioglossus was decreased in CTB-SAP-injected rats. Degenerative changes were observed in both the cell bodies and distal axons of hypoglossal neurons.

DISCUSSION

Preliminary results indicate this model may have translational application to a variety of neurodegenerative diseases resulting in tongue dysfunction and associated dysphagia.

Evaluation and Management of Dysphagia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists' Clinical Practice

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to determine the evaluation and management of dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients by speech-language pathologists (SLPs).

Methods:

A 15-question web-based survey sent to SLPs in general clinical practice.

Results:

Forty-nine SLPs responded. Although only 8 (17.0%) of the SLPs worked in ALS clinics, 46 (93.9%) had worked with ALS patients. A variety of dysphagia evaluation protocols were used by 43 (97.7%) SLPs. Most SLPs, 40 (88.9%), recommended instrumental assessments, but timing and indication varied greatly: 19 (42.2%) SLPs recommended this at baseline even without bulbar symptoms, whereas others recommended this based on symptoms and/or clinical assessments.

Conclusions:

There is currently no uniform approach as to the indication, timing, and specific methods to use in the evaluation of dysphagia in ALS patients among SLPs. There is need for further research to assist in the development of definitive guideline recommendations for this population.

Tongue strength, dysphagia questionnaire, pharyngeal secretions and FEES findings in dysphagia management in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Dysphagia is common in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS shows significant phenotypic variability. It is characterized by progressive weakness and/or spasticity of muscles. Dysphagia symptoms vary. Aspiration is often silent and cognitive dysfunction is common. The purpose of the study was to evaluate tongue strength measurements, dysphagia questionnaire, the presence of pharyngeal secretions, and FEES findings in dysphagia management in ALS.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients completed the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), had their Maximum Isometric Tongue Pressure (MITP), and endurance measured and underwent Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) providing 31 examinations.

RESULTS

Out of 25 patients, 76% were self-reported as dysphagic (EAT-10≥3) with a mean EAT-10 at 14.95 (±7.96). ALS patients had significantly decreased tongue strength (mean MITPanterior: 31.69 ± 17.32kPa). Comparing examinations of dysphagic and non-dysphagic status the mean MITPa of non-dysphagic was significantly greater (52.33 ± 10.97 kPa versus 20.6 ± 12.67 kPa), p<0.001. FEES detected aspiration in 10 out of 31 examinations [Penetration Aspiration Scale(PAS) ≥6]. Aspirator status examinations showed statistically significantly worse cough (p = 0.001), tongue strength (p = 0.001) and endurance (p = 0.003), pharyngeal secretions (p<0.001), velopharyngeal sufficiency (p = 0.006), pharyngeal squeeze (p = 0.009), vocal cords' movements (p = 0.001), pharyngeal pooling (p<0.001), EAT-10 (p = 0.001) and bulbar subscale of ALS Functioning Rating Scale-Revised (b-ALSFRS-R) scores (p = 0.014) compared to non-aspirator status. Correlation analysis indicated that the feeding status had strong statistically significant correlations with the EAT-10 score (rho = -0.816), anterior tongue strength (rho = 0.735), secretions (rho = -0.811), pharyngeal pooling (rho = -0.712) and PAS (rho = -0.676) at FEES, and b-ALSFRS-R score (rho = 0.791), all p<0.001. The EAT-10 had strong statistically significant correlations with the MITPa (r = -0.794, p<0.001), secretions (rho = 0.668, p<0.001), and b-ALSFRS-R score (rho = -0.766, p = 0.001). The FEES findings had strong statistically significant correlations with the anterior tongue strength (pooling: rho = -0.784), and secretions (PAS: rho = 0.723; pooling: rho = 0.671), all p<0.001. For the questionnaire, tongue strength and pharyngeal secretions, ROC analysis assessed cut-off points and discriminating ability to predict aspiration status (Area Under the Curve: 0.838; 0.845 and 0.93, respectively). EAT-10 with a cut-off at 8 was able to predict aspirator status with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.9% (negative predictive value-NPV = 100%). A cut-off value of 22KPa for the MITPa discriminated aspirator status (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 89.5%, NPV = 89.5%). The quantity of secretions observed upon endoscopy with a cut-off value at 1 was able to predict aspirator status (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 80%, NPV = 94.1%).

CONCLUSION

Reduced tongue strength, questionnaire-reported symptoms, pharyngeal secretions, and FESS findings can guide identification of patients with ALS at risk of inefficient and unsafe swallowing.

A Preliminary Investigation of Whether HRCA Signals Can Differentiate Between Swallows from Healthy People and Swallows from People with Neurodegenerative Diseases

High-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA) is an emerging method for non-invasively assessing swallowing by using acoustic signals from a contact microphone, vibratory signals from an accelerometer, and advanced signal processing and machine learning techniques. HRCA has differentiated between safe and unsafe swallows, predicted components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, and predicted kinematic events of swallowing such as hyoid bone displacement, laryngeal vestibular closure, and upper esophageal sphincter opening with a high degree of accuracy. However, HRCA has not been used to characterize swallow function in specific patient populations. This study investigated the ability of HRCA to differentiate between swallows from healthy people and people with neurodegenerative diseases. We hypothesized that HRCA would differentiate between swallows from healthy people and people with neurodegenerative diseases with a high degree of accuracy. We analyzed 170 swallows from 20 patients with neurodegenerative diseases and 170 swallows from 51 healthy age-matched adults who underwent concurrent video fluoroscopy with non-invasive neck sensors. We used a linear mixed model and several supervised machine learning classifiers that use HRCA signal features and a leave-one-out procedure to differentiate between swallows. Twenty-two HRCA signal features were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for predicting whether swallows were from healthy people or from patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Using the HRCA signal features alone, logistic regression and decision trees classified swallows between the two groups with 99% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 99% specificity. This provides preliminary research evidence that HRCA can differentiate swallow function between healthy and patient populations.

Association between maximum tongue pressure and swallowing safety and efficacy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is common in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), leading to a reduction of swallowing safety and efficacy. The tongue has an important role in swallowing function for oral processing and bolus propulsion through the pharynx. The study aims to analyze the association between instrumental findings of OD and tongue pressure.

METHODS

Patients with ALS referred for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were recruited. FEES was conducted to test swallowing function with liquid (5, 10, and 20 ml), semisolid (5, 10, and 20 ml), and solid. FEES recordings were assessed for swallowing safety, using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), and for swallowing efficacy, using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). PAS scores >2 were suggestive of penetration, PAS scores >5 of aspiration, and YPRSRS scores >2 of residue. Maximum tongue pressure (MTP) and tongue endurance were measured using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Tongue pressure measurements were compared between patients with and without penetration, aspiration, or residue.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with ALS were included. Mean MTP was 29.7 kPa, and median tongue endurance was 10 seconds. Patients with residue in the pyriform sinus had a significantly lower MTP than patients without residue in the pyriform sinus with semisolids 10 ml (P = .011) and 20 ml (P = .032). Patients with a tongue endurance <10 seconds exhibited higher frequency of penetration with liquids 5 ml (P = .046), liquids 10 ml (P = .015), and solids (P = .22).

CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES

In patients with ALS, MTP is significantly associated with an impairment of swallowing efficacy and tongue endurance was significantly associated with an impairment of swallowing safety.

Measurement of Pharyngeal Residue From Lateral View Videofluoroscopic Images

Purpose The field lacks consensus about preferred metrics for capturing pharyngeal residue on videofluoroscopy. We explored four different methods, namely, the visuoperceptual Eisenhuber scale and three pixel-based methods: (a) residue area divided by vallecular or pyriform sinus spatial housing ("%-Full"), (b) the Normalized Residue Ratio Scale, and (c) residue area divided by a cervical spine scalar (%(C2-4)2). Method This study involved retrospective analysis of an existing data set of videofluoroscopies performed in 305 adults referred on the basis of suspected dysphagia, who swallowed 15 boluses each (six thin and three each of mildly, moderately, and extremely thick 20% w/v barium). The rest frame at the end of the initial swallow of each bolus was identified. Duplicate measures of pharyngeal residue were made independently by trained raters; interrater reliability was calculated prior to discrepancy resolution. Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were calculated for all measures. Kendall's τb tests explored associations between Eisenhuber scale scores and pixel-based measures, that is, %-Full and %(C2-4)2. Cross-tabulations compared Eisenhuber scale scores to 25% increments of the %-Full measure. Spearman rank correlations evaluated relationships between the %-Full and %(C2-4)2 measures. Results Complete data were available for 3,545 boluses: 37% displayed pharyngeal residue (thin, 36%; mildly thick, 41%; moderately thick, 35%; extremely thick, 34%). Eisenhuber scale scores showed modest positive associations with pixel-based measures but inaccurately estimated residue severity when compared to %-Full measures with errors in 20.6% of vallecular ratings and 14.2% of pyriform sinus ratings. Strong correlations (p < .001) were seen between the %-Full and %(C2-4)2 measures, but the %-Full measures showed inflation when spatial housing area was small. Conclusions Generally good correspondence was seen across different methods of measuring pharyngeal residue. Pixel-based measurement using an anatomical reference scalar, for example, (C2-4)2 is recommended for valid, reliable, and precise measurement.

A Cross-Sectional, Quantitative Videofluoroscopic Analysis of Swallowing Physiology and Function in Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Purpose To date, research characterizing swallowing changes in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has primarily relied on subjective descriptions. Thus, the degree to which swallowing physiology is altered in ALS, and relationships between such alterations and swallow safety and/or efficiency are not well characterized. This study provides a quantitative representation of swallow physiology, safety, and efficiency in a sample of individuals with ALS, to estimate the degree of difference in comparison to published healthy reference data and identify parameters that pose risk to swallow safety and efficiency. Secondary analyses explored the therapeutic effect of thickened liquids on swallowing safety and efficiency. Method Nineteen adults with a diagnosis of probable-definite ALS (El-Escorial Criteria-Revised) underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study, involving up to 15 sips of barium liquid (20% w/v), ranging in thickness from thin to extremely thick. Blinded frame-by-frame videofluoroscopy analysis yielded the following measures: Penetration-Aspiration Scale, number of swallows per bolus, amount of pharyngeal residue, degree of laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC), time-to-LVC, duration of LVC (LVCdur), pharyngeal area at maximum constriction, diameter of upper esophageal sphincter opening, and duration of UES opening (UESOdur). Measures of swallow physiology obtained from thin liquid trials were compared against published healthy reference data using unpaired t tests, chi-squared tests, and Cohen's d effect sizes (adjusted p < .008). Preliminary relationships between parameters of swallowing physiology, safety, and efficiency were explored using nonparametric Cochrane's Q, Friedman's test, and generalized estimating equations (p < .05). Results Compared to healthy reference data, this sample of individuals with ALS displayed a higher proportion of swallows with partial or incomplete LVC (24% vs. < 1%), increased time-to-LVC (d = 1.09), reduced UESwidth (d = 0.59), enlarged pharyngeal area at maximum constriction, prolonged LVCdur (d = 0.64), and prolonged UESOdur (d = 1.34). Unsafe swallowing (i.e., PAS ≥ 3) occurred more frequently when LVC was partial/incomplete or time-to-LVC was prolonged. Pharyngeal residue was associated with larger pharyngeal areas at maximum constriction. Unsafe swallowing occurred less frequently with extremely thick liquids, compared to thin liquids. No significant differences in pharyngeal residue were observed based on liquid thickness. Conclusions Quantitative videofluoroscopic measurements revealed moderate-to-large differences in swallow physiology between this sample of individuals with ALS and healthy reference data. Increased time-to-LVC, noncomplete LVC, and enlarged pharyngeal area at maximum constriction were associated with impaired swallow safety or efficiency. Thickened liquids may mitigate the risk of acute episodes of aspiration in individuals with ALS. Further work is needed to corroborate these preliminary findings and explore how swallowing profiles evolve throughout disease progression.

Clinical Measures of Bulbar Dysfunction in ALS

Bulbar impairment represents a hallmark feature of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) that significantly impacts survival and quality of life. Speech and swallowing dysfunction are key contributors to the clinical heterogeneity of ALS and require well-timed and carefully coordinated interventions. The accurate clinical, radiological and electrophysiological assessment of bulbar dysfunction in ALS is one of the most multidisciplinary aspects of ALS care, requiring expert input from speech-language pathologists (SLPs), neurologists, otolaryngologists, augmentative alternative communication (AAC) specialists, dieticians, and electrophysiologists—each with their own evaluation strategies and assessment tools. The need to systematically evaluate the comparative advantages and drawbacks of various bulbar assessment instruments and to develop integrated assessment protocols is increasingly recognized. In this review, we provide a comprehensive appraisal of the most commonly utilized clinical tools for assessing and monitoring bulbar dysfunction in ALS based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) evaluation framework. Despite a plethora of assessment tools, considerable geographical differences exist in bulbar assessment practices and individual instruments exhibit considerable limitations. The gaps identified in the literature offer unique opportunities for the optimization of existing and development of new tools both for clinical and research applications. The multicenter validation and standardization of these instruments will be essential for guideline development and best practice recommendations.

Reduced pharyngeal constriction is associated with impaired swallowing efficiency in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

BACKGROUND

Swallowing inefficiency is a prevalent but understudied problem in individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Although reduced pharyngeal constriction has been identified as a mechanism contributing to swallowing inefficiency following stroke, this relationship has not been empirically tested in the ALS population. This study sought to characterize profiles of swallowing efficiency in a sample of ALS patients and investigate relationships between pharyngeal constriction and swallowing efficiency.

METHODS

Twenty-six adults with ALS underwent videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, involving 3 mL-thin, 20 mL-thin, and 3 mL-pudding boluses. Full-length recordings were segmented into bolus clips and randomized for analysis. We recorded the total number of swallows per bolus and obtained normalized pixel-based measures of pharyngeal constriction area and post-swallow residue in the vallecular and pyriform sinuses. Linear mixed models with Spearman's correlations were used to determine relationships between pharyngeal constriction and swallowing efficiency, with added factors of bolus volume and thickness.

KEY RESULTS

Individuals with ALS demonstrated reduced pharyngeal constriction and increased vallecular and pyriform sinus residue, compared to norms. Reduced pharyngeal constriction had a significant effect on the presence of vallecular and pyriform sinus residue as well as the number of swallows per bolus. Increased bolus thickness was associated with increased vallecular residue, while increased bolus volume was associated with reduced pharyngeal constriction. Results were significant at P < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Our results suggest that reduced pharyngeal constriction is a significant physiological parameter related to swallow inefficiency in ALS. Future work is needed to corroborate these preliminary results and investigate factors to mitigate such impairments.

Functional limitation of the masticatory system in patients with bulbar involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with bulbar dysfunction affects the motor neurons responsible for controlling the muscles in the jaw, face, soft palate, pharynx, larynx and tongue. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the functional limitation of the jaw in patients with ALS and bulbar dysfunction who had upper motor neuron (UMN), lower motor neuron (LMN) or balanced involvement. One hundred and fifty-three patients with ALS and 23 controls were included. All participants answered using the 8-item Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-8). Patients with ALS were grouped by neurologic examination as follows: non-bulbar ALS, bulbar UMN-predominant ALS; bulbar LMN-predominant ALS; and bulbar balanced (UMN + LMN) ALS. Jaw limitation between the different groups was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with non-bulbar ALS had similar mandibular limitations to healthy participants. Only patients with balanced UMN and LMN bulbar manifestations reported greater difficulties in chewing soft food or in jaw mobility compared to the non-bulbar ALS group. Patients with bulbar involvement also had greater difficulties in chewing tough food or chicken and in swallowing and talking compared to the non-bulbar group, regardless of whether UMN or LMN predominant. No significant differences were found between the groups in smiling and yawning difficulties. Bulbar involvement in patients with ALS is associated with functional limitation of the masticatory system. However, balanced bulbar UMN and LMN involvement is associated with the worst impairments in chewing soft food and in opening the jaw widely.