1
|
Teoh AYB, Chan SM, Yip HC. Is endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy better than surgical gastrojejunostomy or duodenal stenting? Dig Endosc 2024. [PMID: 39370536 DOI: 10.1111/den.14929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Gastrojejunostomy is a critical procedure for managing gastric outlet obstruction. While surgical gastrojejunostomy has traditionally been the standard approach, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy has emerged as a promising endoscopic alternative. This comprehensive review aims to explore the development, techniques, outcomes, and comparative effectiveness of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in comparison to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases to identify relevant studies published up to April 2024. The search included keywords related to EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy, surgical gastrojejunostomy, and duodenal stenting. Studies reporting on technical success, clinical success, complications, recurrence rates, quality of life, and long-term outcomes were included for analysis. RESULTS The development of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy has evolved significantly over the years, driven by device advancements and improved endoscopic techniques. Comparative studies have shown that the technique offers several advantages, including the ability to create an anastomosis without the need for surgery, reduced invasiveness, shorter hospital stays, and potentially improved patient outcomes as compared to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. CONCLUSION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy represents a promising alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy and duodenal stenting for the management of gastric outlet obstruction. The technique has evolved significantly, offering a less invasive and more effective treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shannon Melissa Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hon Chi Yip
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran KV, Vo NP, Nguyen HS, Vo NT, Thai TBT, Pham VA, Loh EW, Tam KW. Palliative procedures for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 56:780-789. [PMID: 38641337 DOI: 10.1055/a-2309-7683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) remains uncertain. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively investigate the efficacy and safety of four palliative treatments for malignant GOO: gastrojejunostomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PGJ), and endoscopic stenting. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the four treatments for malignant GOO. We included studies that reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: clinical success, 30-day mortality, reintervention rate, or length of hospital stay. Evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs was naïve combined to perform network meta-analysis through the frequentist approach using an inverse variance model. Treatments were ranked by P score. RESULTS This network meta-analysis included 3617 patients from 4 RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 32 retrospective cohort studies. PGJ was the optimal approach in terms of clinical success and reintervention (P scores: 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). EUS-GE had the highest probability of being the optimal treatment in terms of 30-day mortality and complications (P scores: 0.82 and 0.99, respectively). Cluster ranking to combine the P scores for 30-day mortality and reintervention indicated the benefits of PGJ and EUS-GE (cophenetic correlation coefficient: 0.94; PGJ and EUS-GE were in the same cluster). CONCLUSION PGJ and EUS-GE are recommended for malignant GOO. PGJ could be the alternative choice in centers with limited resources or in patients who are unsuitable for EUS-GE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khoi Van Tran
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Nguyen-Phong Vo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Hung Song Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
- Intensive Care Unit Department, Children's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Nhi Thi Vo
- Faculty of Nursing, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - Thi Bao Trang Thai
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Vu Anh Pham
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - El-Wui Loh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vilas-Boas F, Rizzo GEM, De Ponthaud C, Robinson S, Gaujoux S, Capurso G, Vanella G, Bozkırlı B. Unveiling hidden outcomes in malignant gastric outlet obstruction research - insights from a "Pancreas 2000" review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16:451-461. [PMID: 39155997 PMCID: PMC11325868 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) is a major condition affecting patients with periampullary tumors, including pancreatic cancer. The current treatment options include surgical gastroenterostomy, endoscopic stenting and more recently EUS-guided gastroenterostomy. Most studies comparing the outcomes of the three procedures focus on technical success, clinical success and safety. Several "occult" outcomes relevant to the patient's viewpoints and perspective may ultimately impact on cancer-related and overall survival, such as body mass composition, nutritional biomarkers, chemotherapy tolerance and patient-reported quality of life. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of potential key outcomes that should be explored in future comparative research around mGOO treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Vilas-Boas
- Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, Porto 4200, Portugal
| | - Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare - The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies, Palermo 90127, Sicilia, Italy
| | - Charles De Ponthaud
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtriere, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, Île-de-France, France
| | - Stuart Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7DN, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtriere, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, Île-de-France, France
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
| | - Bahadır Bozkırlı
- Department of General Surgery, HPB-Unit, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul 34398, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pawa R, Koutlas NJ, Russell G, Shen P, Pawa S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy versus robotic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. DEN OPEN 2024; 4:e248. [PMID: 37228709 PMCID: PMC10204173 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has traditionally been managed with enteral stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. Our study aimed to compare outcomes between endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) using a lumen-apposing metal stent and robotic GJ (R-GJ) for unresectable malignant GOO. Methods Patients undergoing EUS-GJ or R-GJ for unresectable malignant GOO were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical success defined by the ability to tolerate oral intake at the time of discharge. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, adverse events, and post-procedure length of stay (LOS). Results A total of 44 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 44, 29 underwent EUS-GJ and 15 underwent R-GJ. Age, gender, malignant etiology, and presence of ascites were similar between the two groups. Patients treated with EUS-GJ had a higher mean Charlson comorbidity index (10.3 vs. 7.0; p ≤ 0.0001) and a lower preoperative body mass index (22.3 vs. 27.2; p = 0.007). Technical and clinical success was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups (p > 0.99). EUS-GJ was associated with shorter procedure duration (57.5 vs. 146.3 min; p < 0.0001), hospital LOS (4.3 vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.0009), and time to oral intake (1.0 vs. 5.8 days; p < 0.0001) when compared to R-GJ. Adverse events occurred in 5 of the R-GJ patients and none of the EUS-GJ patients (p = 0.003). Conclusions EUS-GJ has similar efficacy and superior clinical outcomes compared to R-GJ in the management of malignant GOO. Prospective studies with longer follow-up duration are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Pawa
- Department of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Nicholas J Koutlas
- Department of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Greg Russell
- Biostatistics and Data ScienceWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemUSA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of SurgeryWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lai H, Wu K, Liu Y, Li D, Peng T, Zhang B. Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stent placement for treatment of primary and metastatic gastric outlet obstruction. Ir J Med Sci 2023; 192:2077-2084. [PMID: 36441448 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03195-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) usually occurs at the pylorus or the duodenum through primary gastric, duodenal, or pancreatic tumors. However, metastatic GOO is relatively rare. Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is often performed as an alternative and practical palliative approach for primary GOO, there are few reports of metastatic GOO treatment with SEMS. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, stent patency, and complications of SEMS for treating primary and metastatic GOO. METHODS The data of 42 patients with GOO who received SEMS from November 2016 to April 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into primary group (n = 25) and metastatic group (n = 17) according to the cause of GOO. The rates of technical and clinical success, stent patency, and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The overall technical and clinical success rates were 97.9% and 93.5%, respectively. The total SEMS implantation time was 48.2 ± 33.5 (10.0-140.0) minutes. The primary technical success rate was 100.0% in both primary and metastatic groups, and the primary clinical success rate was 96.0% (24/25) in the primary group vs 88.2% (15/17) in the metastatic group (P = 0.350). After reintervention, the secondary technical success rate was 100.0% (27/27) in the primary group vs 95.0% (19/20) in the metastatic group (P = 0.330); and the secondary clinical success rate was 96.3% (26/27) in the primary group vs 89.5% (17/19) in the metastatic group (P = 0.367). No serious complications, such as gastrointestinal perforation, stent migration, bleeding, or aspiration pneumonia, were observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS SEMS under fluoroscopic guidance is an effective and safe treatment for primary and metastatic GOO. The etiology of obstruction did not influence stent patency or complications. Therefore, stent implantation is recommended for patients with metastatic GOO caused by multiple peritoneal metastases to improve their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyang Lai
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ketong Wu
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Interventional Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 26, Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
On W, Ahmed W, Everett S, Huggett M, Paranandi B. Utility of interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1252824. [PMID: 37781196 PMCID: PMC10540845 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1252824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has an important role in the management algorithm of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), typically for its diagnostic utilities. The past two decades have seen a rapid expansion of the therapeutic capabilities of EUS. Interventional EUS is now one of the more exciting developments within the field of endoscopy. The local effects of PDAC tend to be in anatomical areas which are difficult to target and endoscopy has cemented itself as a key role in managing the clinical sequelae of PDAC. Interventional EUS is increasingly utilized in situations whereby conventional endoscopy is either impossible to perform or unsuccessful. It also adds a different dimension to the host of oncological and surgical treatments for patients with PDAC. In this review, we aim to summarize the various ways in which interventional EUS could benefit patients with PDAC and aim to provide a balanced commentary on the current evidence of interventional EUS in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei On
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garcia-Alonso FJ, Chavarria C, Subtil JC, Aparicio JR, Busto Bea V, Martinez-Moreno B, Vila JJ, Martín-Álvarez V, Sanchez-Delgado L, de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M. Prospective multicenter assessment of the impact of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy on patient quality of life in unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:28-35. [PMID: 36801458 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in inoperable patients. However, the impact of EUS-GE on patient quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated prospectively. METHODS Consecutive patients with unresectable malignant GOO who underwent EUS-GE between August 2019 and May 2021 at 4 Spanish centers were prospectively assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 at baseline and 1 month after the procedure. Centralized follow-up by telephone calls was undertaken. The Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) was used to assess oral intake, defining clinical success as a GOOSS ≥2. Differences between baseline and 30-day QoL scores were assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 33 (51.6%) men, with a median age of 77.3 years (interquartile range, 65.5-86.5). The most common diagnoses were pancreatic (35.9%) and gastric (31.3%) adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven patients (57.9%) presented a 2/3 baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Oral intake was restarted within 48 hours in 61 patients (95.3%), and the median postprocedure hospital stay was 3.5 days (interquartile range, 2-5). The 30-day clinical success rate was 83.3%. A clinically significant increase of 21.6 points (95% confidence interval, 11.5-31.7) in the global health status scale was documented, with significant improvements in nausea and vomiting, pain, constipation, and appetite loss. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GE relieves GOO symptoms in patients with unresectable malignancy, allowing rapid oral intake and hospital discharge. It also provides a clinically relevant increase in QoL scores at 30 days from baseline. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04660695.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Chavarria
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jose Carlos Subtil
- Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jose Ramón Aparicio
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Victoria Busto Bea
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Belén Martinez-Moreno
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan J Vila
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radlinski MJ, Strand DS, Shami VM. Evolution of interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goad038. [PMID: 37398926 PMCID: PMC10313421 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an indispensable modality for the assessment of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures since its origin in the 1980s. Following the development of the linear echoendoscope, EUS has evolved from a purely diagnostic modality to a sophisticated tool for intervention, with numerous luminal, pancreaticobiliary, and hepatic applications. Broadly, these applications may be subdivided into three categories: transluminal drainage or access procedures, injection therapy, and EUS-guided liver interventions. Transluminal drainage or access procedures include management of pancreatic fluid collection, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided bile duct drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage, and enteral anastomosis formation. Injection therapies include therapeutic EUS-guided injections for management of malignancies accessible by EUS. EUS-guided liver applications include EUS-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and EUS-guided vascular therapies. In this review, we discuss the origins of each of these EUS applications, evolution of techniques leading to the current status, and future directions of EUS-guided interventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Radlinski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Daniel S Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vanessa M Shami
- Corresponding author. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. Tel: +1-434-989-4381;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martins RK, Brunaldi VO, Fernandes AL, Otoch JP, Artifon ELDA. Palliative therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: how does the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy compare with surgery and endoscopic stenting? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 16:26317745221149626. [PMID: 36698443 PMCID: PMC9869232 DOI: 10.1177/26317745221149626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The gold-standard procedure to address malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJJ). Two endoscopic alternatives have also been proposed: the endoscopic stenting (ES) and the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-G). This study aimed to perform a thorough and strict meta-analysis to compare EUS-G with the SGJJ and ES in treating patients with MGOO. Materials and Methods Studies comparing EUS-G to endoscopic stenting or SGJJ for patients with MGOO were considered eligible. We conducted online searches in primary databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Central Cochrane) from inception through October 2021. The outcomes were technical and clinical success rates, serious adverse events (SAEs), reintervention due to obstruction, length of hospital stay (LOS), and time to oral intake. Results We found similar technical success rates between ES and EUS-G but clinical success rates favored the latter. The comparison between EUS-G and SGJJ demonstrated better technical success rates in favor of the surgical approach but similar clinical success rates. EUS-G shortens the LOS by 2.8 days compared with ES and 5.8 days compared with SGJJ. Concerning reintervention due to obstruction, we found similar rates for EUS-G and SGJJ but considerably higher rates for ES compared with EUS-G. As to AEs, we demonstrated equivalent rates comparing EUS-G and SGJJ but significantly higher ones compared with ES. Conclusion Despite being novel and still under refinement, the EUS-G has good safety and efficacy profiles compared with SGJJ and ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Krieger Martins
- Postgraduate Program of Anesthesiology, Surgical Sciences and Perioperative Medicine, University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 255 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Surgery and Anatomy Department, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chan SM, Dhir V, Chan YYY, Cheung CHN, Chow JCS, Wong IWM, Shah R, Yip HC, Itoi T, Teoh AYB. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass, duodenal stent or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Dig Endosc 2022; 35:512-519. [PMID: 36374127 DOI: 10.1111/den.14472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) can be relieved by either laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ), endoscopic stenting (SEMS) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass; EPASS). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the three treatment methods. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who suffered from malignant GOO between January 2012 to November 2020 that received either EPASS, LGJ or SEMS. The outcomes included the technical and clinical success, 30-day adverse events and mortality, pre and post stenting GOO scores (GOOSs), stent patency and causes of stent dysfunction. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients were included (30 EPASS, 35 LGJ, 49 SEMS). The technical success of EPASS, LGJ and SEMS were 93.3%, 100%, 100% (P = 0.058) and clinical success rates were 93.3%, 80%, 87.8% (P = 0.276), respectively. Procedural time was longest for the LGJ group (P < 0.001). The EPASS group had the shortest hospital stay (EPASS 1.5 [1-17], LGJ 7 [2-44], SEMS 5 [2-46] days, P < 0.001). EPASS group also had the lowest rates of recurrent obstruction (EPASS 3.3%, LGJ 17.1%, SEMS 36.7%, P = 0.002) and re-intervention (EPASS 3.3%, LGJ 17.1%, SEMS 26.5%, P = 0.031). The 1-month GOOS was highest in the EPASS group (EPASS 3 [1-3], LGJ 3 [0-3], SEMS 2 [0-3], P = 0.028). CONCLUSION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy was associated with better clinical outcomes then the other two procedures. The procedure may be the best option provided that the expertise is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Melissa Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Vinay Dhir
- Institute of Digestive and Liver Care, S.L. Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Yvonne Yuet Yan Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chole Hiu Nam Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Joelle Chung Shan Chow
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Isabella Wing Man Wong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rahul Shah
- Institute of Digestive and Liver Care, S.L. Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Hon Chi Yip
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Wanrooij RLJ, Vanella G, Bronswijk M, de Gooyer P, Laleman W, van Malenstein H, Mandarino FV, Dell'Anna G, Fockens P, Arcidiacono PG, van der Merwe SW, Voermans RP. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1023-1031. [PMID: 35325931 DOI: 10.1055/a-1782-7568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic duodenal stenting is the current standard treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with limited life expectancy. However, duodenal stenting is prone to stent dysfunction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel technique with potentially superior stent patency. We compared clinical success, safety, and stent dysfunction of EUS-GE and duodenal stenting in patients with malignant GOO using propensity score matching. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GE or duodenal stenting for GOO between 2015 and 2021 in three European centers. Primary outcomes were clinical success (GOO scoring system [GOOSS] ≥ 2) and stent dysfunction (GOOSS ≤ 1 after initial clinical success). A propensity score matching (1:1) analysis was performed using age, sex, underlying disease, disease stage, ascites, and peritoneal carcinomatosis as variables. RESULTS 214 patients underwent EUS-GE (n = 107) or duodenal stenting (n = 107). After propensity score matching, 176 patients were matched and compared. Technical success rates for EUS-GE and duodenal stenting were 94 % (95 %CI 89 %-99 %) vs. 98 % (95 %CI 95 %-100 %), respectively (P = 0.44). Clinical success rates were 91 % (95 %CI 85 %-97 %) vs. 75 % (95 %CI 66 %-84 %; P = 0.008). Stent dysfunction occurred in 1 % (95 %CI 0-4 %) vs. 26 % (95 %CI 15 %-37 %) of patients (P < 0.001). Adverse event rate was 10 % (95 %CI 4 %-17 %) vs. 21 % (95 %CI 12 %-29 %; P = 0.09). CONCLUSION EUS-GE had higher clinical success and lower stent dysfunction, with similar safety, compared with duodenal stenting, suggesting that EUS-GE may be preferred over duodenal stenting in patients with malignant GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Peter de Gooyer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Laleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannah van Malenstein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dell'Anna
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo G Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Schalk W van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khamar J, Lee Y, Sachdeva A, Anpalagan T, McKechnie T, Eskicioglu C, Agzarian J, Doumouras A, Hong D. Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022:10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5. [PMID: 36138247 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been a standard palliative procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), endoscopic stenting (ES) has shown to provide benefits due to its non-invasive approach. The aim of this review is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of ES versus GJ for the palliation of malignant GOO. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched and comparative studies of adult GOO patients undergoing ES or GJ were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were survival time and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, reinterventions, days until oral food tolerance, postoperative adjuvant palliative chemotherapy, postoperative morbidities, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Pairwise meta-analyses using inverse-variance random effects were performed. RESULTS After identifying 2222 citations, 39 full-text articles fit the inclusion criteria. In total, 3128 ES patients (41.4% female, age: 68.0 years) and 2116 GJ patients (40.4% female, age: 66.8 years) were included. ES patients experienced a shorter survival time (mean difference -24.77 days, 95% Cl - 45.11 to - 4.43, p = 0.02) and were less likely to undergo adjuvant palliative chemotherapy (risk ratio 0.81, 95% Cl 0.70 to 0.93, p = 0.004). The ES group had a shorter LOS, shorter time to oral intake of liquids and solids, and less surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.30, 95% Cl 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01). The patients in the ES group were at greater risk of requiring reintervention (risk ratio 2.60, 95% Cl 1.87 to 3.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION ES results in less postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS when compared to GJ, however, this may be at the cost of decreased initiation of adjuvant palliative chemotherapy and overall survival, as well as increased risk of reintervention. Both techniques are likely appropriate in select clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jigish Khamar
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anjali Sachdeva
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tharani Anpalagan
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Agzarian
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Aristithes Doumouras
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nohria A, Kaslow SR, Hani L, He Y, Sacks GD, Berman RS, Lee AY, Correa-Gallego C. Outcomes After Surgical Palliation of Patients With Gastric Cancer. J Surg Res 2022; 279:304-311. [PMID: 35809355 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery is an option for symptom palliation in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Operative outcomes after palliative interventions are largely unknown. Herein, we assess the trends of surgical palliation use for patients with gastric cancer and describe outcomes of patients undergoing surgical palliation compared to nonsurgical palliation. METHODS Patients with clinical Stage IV gastric cancer in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) who received surgical or nonsurgical palliation were selected. We identified factors associated with palliative surgery. Survival differences were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimate, Cox proportional hazard regression, and log rank test. RESULTS Six thousand eight hundred twenty nine patients received palliative care for gastric cancer. Most patients (87%, n = 5944) received nonsurgical palliation: 29% radiation therapy, 57% systemic treatment, and 14% pain management. The number of patients receiving palliative care increased between 2004 and 2015; however, use of surgical palliation declined significantly (22% in 2004, 8% in 2015; P < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 5.65 mo (95% confidence interval 5.45-5.85); 1-year and 2-year OS were 24% and 9%, respectively. Older age at diagnosis and diagnosis between 2004 and 2006 were significantly associated with undergoing surgical palliation. Patients who underwent surgical palliation had significantly shorter median OS and a 20% higher hazard of mortality than those who received nonsurgical palliation. CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic gastric cancer experience very short survival. While palliative surgery is used infrequently, the observed association with shorter median OS underscores the importance of careful patient selection. Palliative surgery should be offered judiciously and expectations about outcomes clearly established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambika Nohria
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sarah R Kaslow
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - Leena Hani
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Yanjie He
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Russell S Berman
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Ann Y Lee
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Camilo Correa-Gallego
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mangiavillano B, Repici A. EUS-guided gastro-enteral anastomosis for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction: is the end of the enteral stent? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:587-589. [PMID: 35772181 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2097071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hong J, Chen Y, Li J, Hu P, Chen P, Du N, Huang T, Chen J. Comparison of gastrojejunostomy to endoscopic stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: An updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2022; 223:1067-1078. [PMID: 34728070 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the optimal intervention modality for malignant GOO by comparing clinical outcomes after Gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic stenting. METHODS Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles before February 2021 to compare the clinical outcomes of GOO patients undergoing GJ or ES. RESULTS This meta-analysis included 31 articles with 2444 GOO patients. Although the GJ group outperformed the ES group in technical success (OR,3.79; P = 0.003), clinical success was not significantly different between the two groups (OR,1.25; P = 0.50). The GJ group had a longer hospitalization, lower re-obstruction and lower reintervention. Moreover, GJ had a better survival than ES in the gastric cancer group (HR, 0.33; P = 0.009). However, no significant statistical difference was observed in the pancreatic cancer group (HR, 0.55; P = 0.159). CONCLUSIONS Both GJ and ES are safe and effective intervention modalities for malignant GOO. GJ had significantly improved survival in gastric cancer patients with GOO, while no significant difference was observed between the two groups in pancreatic cancer patients with GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaze Hong
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yizhou Chen
- Emergency Medical Center, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Jiayu Li
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Peidong Hu
- Schools of Medicine & Nursing Sciences, Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Nannan Du
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Tongmin Huang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Jingjie Chen
- Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaneko J, Ishiwatari H, Asakura K, Satoh T, Sato J, Ishikawa K, Matsubayashi H, Yabuuchi Y, Kishida Y, Yoshida M, Ito S, Kawata N, Imai K, Takizawa K, Hotta K, Ono H. Biliary obstruction and pancreatitis after duodenal stent placement in the descending duodenum: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:257. [PMID: 35597896 PMCID: PMC9123653 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02333-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metallic stents placed in the descending duodenum can cause compression of the major duodenal papilla, resulting in biliary obstruction and pancreatitis. These are notable early adverse events of duodenal stent placement; however, they have been rarely examined. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for biliary obstruction and/or pancreatitis after duodenal stent placement in the descending duodenum. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data of consecutive patients who underwent metallic stent placement in the descending duodenum for malignant gastric outlet obstruction at a tertiary referral cancer center between April 2014 and December 2019. Risk factors for biliary obstruction and/or pancreatitis were analyzed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were included. Biliary obstruction and/or pancreatitis occurred in 12 patients (18%): 8 with biliary obstruction, 2 with pancreatitis, and 2 with both biliary obstruction and pancreatitis. Multivariate analysis indicated that female sex (odds ratio: 9.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-58.6, P = 0.02), absence of biliary stents (odds ratio: 12.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-90.2, P = 0.01), and tumor invasion to the major duodenal papilla (odds ratio: 25.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.0-340.0, P = 0.01) were significant independent risk factors for biliary obstruction and/or pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of biliary obstruction and/or pancreatitis after duodenal stent placement in the descending duodenum was non-negligible. Female sex, absence of biliary stents, and tumor invasion to the major duodenal papilla were the primary risk factors. Risk stratification can allow endoscopists to better identify patients at significant risk and permit detailed informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Kaneko
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Hirotoshi Ishiwatari
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Koiku Asakura
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Satoh
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Junya Sato
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Kazuma Ishikawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
- Division of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yohei Yabuuchi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kishida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Masao Yoshida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Kohei Takizawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Campana LG, Fish R, Dickinson OT, McNamara MG, O'Dwyer ST, Laasch HU. Distal migration of a partially covered duodenal stent requiring emergency surgical extraction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2022. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giovanni Campana
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Fish
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Theresa O'Dwyer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hans-Ulrich Laasch
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Minnova Medical Foundation CIC, Wilmslow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bomman S, Ghafoor A, Sanders DJ, Jayaraj M, Chandra S, Krishnamoorthi R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy in treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E361-E368. [PMID: 35433211 PMCID: PMC9010108 DOI: 10.1055/a-1783-8949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has conventionally been with surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Advent of devices like lumen apposing metal stents has made endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) a potential alternative to SGJ for these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared outcomes of EUS-GE versus SGJ. Methods We performed a comprehensive systematic search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings through January 2021 and identified six studies that compared outcomes of EUS-GE versus SGJ in the management of malignant GOO. The rates of technical success, clinical success, and AEs were analyzed, and pooled odds ratios were calculated using random effects model. Results Six studies were included in our analysis with a total of 484 patients, of which 291 underwent EUS-GE and 193 underwent SGJ. The technical success rate of SGJ was superior to EUS-GE (OR = 0.195; 95 %CI:0.054-0.702; P = 0.012; I 2 = 0). The clinical success of EUS-GE was statistically similar to SGJ (OR = 1.566; 95 %CI:0.585-4.197; P = 0.372; I 2 = 46.68 %). EUS-GE had significantly fewer AEs compared to SGJ (OR = 0.295; 95 %CI:0.172-0.506; P < 0.005; I 2 = 0). Among studies which reported reintervention rates, EUS-GE was statistically similar to SGJ (OR = 0.587; 95 %CI:0.174-1.979; P = 0.390, I 2 = 54.91). Minimal to moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analyses. Conclusions EUS-GE has equivalent clinical success and reintervention rates, but significantly lower adverse events compared to SGJ. When feasible, EUS-GE appears to be an effective and safe alternative to SGJ for palliative management of malignant GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivanand Bomman
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Adil Ghafoor
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - David J. Sanders
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Mahendran Jayaraj
- Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
| | - Shruti Chandra
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnnesota, United States
| | - Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Conti Bellocchi MC, Crinò SF, Fioravante M, Gabrieletto EM, Di Stefano S, Bernardoni L, Gkolfakis P, Ofosu A, Facciorusso A, Gabbrielli A. Development and validation of a risk score for prediction of clinical success after duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:393-399. [PMID: 35306934 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2056445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To develop and validate a risk score for predicting clinical success after duodenal stenting using self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent duodenal stenting for malignant GOO were evaluated. Potential predictors of clinical success were determined by uni/multivariate logistic regression analysis.Multiplication of the regression coefficients of the logistic regression model by a factor of two and rounding to obtain easy-to-use point numbers enabling the calculation of the score. Using 10-fold cross-validation, the model was internally validated. RESULTS One hundred twelve patients were included. Clinical success was achieved in 93 (83.0%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression, selected age ≤65 years (p = 0.05, 1.5 points), stenosis type I (p = 0.04, 3 points), and pancreatic cancer (p = 0.01, 3.5 points) were significant predictors of clinical success. On the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, a score of 5 had higher specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSION Our score could be useful at identifying, among poor surgical candidates, patients more likely to benefit from SEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Marzia Fioravante
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Gabrieletto
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Serena Di Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Division of Digestive Diseases and Hepatology, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Papanikolaou IS, Siersema PD. Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2022; 16:667-675. [PMID: 35314520 PMCID: PMC9474481 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common condition in which mechanical obstruction of the pylorus, distal stomach, or duodenum causes severe symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Its etiology includes both benign and malignant disorders. Currently, GOO has many treatment options, including initial conservative therapeutic protocols and more invasive procedures, such as surgical gastroenterostomy, stent placement and, the most recently implemented procedure, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). Each procedure has its merits, with surgery often prevailing in patients with longer life expectancy and stents being used most often in patients with malignant gastric outlet stenosis. The newly developed EUS-GE combines the immediate effect of stents and the long-term efficacy of gastroenterostomy. However, this novel method is a technically demanding process that requires expert experience and special facilities. Thus, the true clinical effectiveness, as well as the duration of the effects of EUS-GE, still need to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Qazi S, Elzahrani MR, Tatwani AT, Hilabi AS. Trans-Biliary Gastric Outlet Recanalization and Stenting: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e22692. [PMID: 35386164 PMCID: PMC8967073 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric ischemia is a condition of hypo-perfusion associated with hypotension, vasculitis, and thromboembolism. We report a case of a gastric outflow obstruction due to sizeable visceral artery thrombo-embolism leading to the ischemic conclusion, the frailty, multiple comorbidities deeming general anesthesia (GA) risky, and the patient’s decision not to have an open surgery under GA. Invasive procedures in patients with similar profiles like our patient are usually not risk-free, this leads the intervention radiology team to believe a minimally invasive procedure while avoiding GA might be optimal. A 63-year-old female with multiple comorbidities came eight weeks after significant surgery complaining of severe acute epigastric pain, abdominal distention and rigidity, and persistent vomiting. Further investigations showed obstruction in the gastric antrum and pyloric canal. Three separate endoscopic attempts to find and cross the stricture failed. Firstly, gastrostomy access was established, but due to the stomach being massively distended, passing a guidewire through the pylorus failed despite using multiple hydrophilic wires and pre-shaped catheters, this is due to the collapsed pylorus. Subsequently, two attempts under ultrasound guidance to puncture the duodenal bulb and pass a wire and catheter through the antrum stricture were unsuccessful, and another attempt was considered of high risk. An alternative approach through the gallbladder was established, and cholangiography was performed to delineate the anatomy. Then an approach through the right hepatic duct and ampulla of Vater was successfully performed. The attempted passage through the stricture was successful. The dilation was successful, and the patient tolerated both fluid and solids orally. Due to having such a frail patient, interventions of minimal invasiveness and favorable outcome are welcomed. This case report suggests that this technique showed satisfactory results and achieved the goal to improve the overall quality of life where the patient had a good oral intake with no post-operation complications.
Collapse
|
22
|
Azemoto N, Ueno M, Yanagimoto H, Mizuno N, Kawamoto Y, Maruki Y, Watanabe K, Suzuki R, Kaneko J, Hisada Y, Sato H, Kobayashi S, Miyata H, Furukawa M, Mizukami T, Miwa H, Ohno Y, Tsuji K, Tsujimoto A, Nagano H, Okuyama H, Asagi A, Okano N, Ishii H, Morizane C, Ikeda M, Furuse J. Endoscopic duodenal stent placement versus gastrojejunostomy for unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with duodenal stenosis before introduction of initial chemotherapy (GASPACHO study): a multicenter retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:134-142. [PMID: 34969090 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic duodenal stent placement is an alternative technique to gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic duodenal stent placement with that of gastrojejunostomy for treating patients with pancreatic cancer who are candidates for intensive combination chemotherapies as the first line of treatment. METHODS This retrospective observational study included 100 patients from 18 institutions in Japan. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, (2) good performance status, (3) gastric outlet obstruction scoring system score of 0-1 and (4) no history of treatment for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the background characteristics of patients in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement (n = 57) and gastrojejunostomy (n = 43) groups. The median overall survival in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement and gastrojejunostomy groups was 5.9 and 6.0 months, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93 cases; the median time to food intake resumption was significantly shorter in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 3 days, n = 54) than in the gastrojejunostomy group (median: 5 days, n = 43). Chemotherapy was introduced in 63% of the patients in both groups after endoscopic duodenal stent placement or gastrojejunostomy. Chemotherapy was started earlier in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 14 days) than in the gastrojejunostomy (median: 32 days) group. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic duodenal stent placement showed similar or better clinical outcomes than gastrojejunostomy. Thus, it might be a promising option in patients with good performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Azemoto
- Center of Liver-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yanagimoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobumasa Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kawamoto
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Watanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Rei Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Junichi Kaneko
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuya Hisada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sato
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideki Miyata
- Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefecture Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takuro Mizukami
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Haruo Miwa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ohno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Uwajima Municipal Hospital, Uwajima, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Akiko Tsujimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Japan
| | - Akinori Asagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishii
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Merwe SW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M, Everett S, Lakhtakia S, Rimbas M, Hucl T, Kunda R, Badaoui A, Law R, Arcidiacono PG, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Khashab MA, Binmoeller KF, Barthet M, Perez-Miranda M, van Hooft JE. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54:185-205. [PMID: 34937098 DOI: 10.1055/a-1717-1391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in malignant distal biliary obstruction when local expertise is available.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests EUS-BD with hepaticogastrostomy only for malignant inoperable hilar biliary obstruction with a dilated left hepatic duct when inadequately drained by ERCP and/or PTBD in high volume expert centers.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends that EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be considered in symptomatic patients with an obstructed PD when retrograde endoscopic intervention fails or is not possible.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends rendezvous EUS techniques over transmural PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy owing to its lower rate of adverse events.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, in patients at high surgical risk, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) should be favored over percutaneous gallbladder drainage where both techniques are available, owing to the lower rates of adverse events and need for re-interventions in EUS-GBD.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), in an expert setting, for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, as an alternative to enteral stenting or surgery.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that EUS-GE may be considered in the management of afferent loop syndrome, especially in the setting of malignancy or in poor surgical candidates. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) can be offered, in expert centers, to patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following multidisciplinary decision-making, with the aim of overcoming the invasiveness of laparoscopy-assisted ERCP and the limitations of enteroscopy-assisted ERCP.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Schalk W van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AGEM Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Simon Everett
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India
| | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Ryan Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paolo G Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, and Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Disease, Marseille, France
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth F Binmoeller
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hori Y, Hayashi K, Naitoh I, Miyabe K, Natsume M, Yoshida M, Kataoka H. A pilot study of novel duodenal covered self-expandable metal stent fixation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19708. [PMID: 34611264 PMCID: PMC8492690 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99265-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Migration of duodenal covered self-expandable metal stents (C-SEMSs) is the main cause of stent dysfunction in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). Because endoscopic SEMS placement is frequently selected in patients with poor performance status, we concurrently focused on the safety of the treatment. This pilot study included 15 consecutive patients with mGOO who underwent duodenal partially covered SEMS (PC-SEMS) placement with fixation using an over-the-scope-clip (OTSC). Technical feasibility, clinical success for oral intake estimated by the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) score, and adverse events including stent migration were retrospectively assessed. All procedures were successful, and clinical success was achieved in 86.7% (13/15). Mean GOOSS scores were improved from 0.07 to 2.53 after the procedure (P < 0.001). Median survival time was 84 days, and all patients were followed up until death. Stent migration occurred in one case (6.7%) at day 17, which was successfully treated by removal of the migrated PC-SEMS using an enteroscope. For fixation using an OTSC, additional time required for the procedure was 8.9 ± 4.1 min and we did not observe OTSC-associated adverse events. Poor performance status was associated with clinical success (P = 0.03), but we could provide the treatment safely and reduce mGOO symptoms even in patients with poor performance status. In conclusion, duodenal PC-SEMS fixation using an OTSC is feasible for preventing stent migration in patients with mGOO including those with poor performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuki Hori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
| | - Kazuki Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Itaru Naitoh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Miyabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Makoto Natsume
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Michihiro Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Hiromi Kataoka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wu CH, Lee MH, Tsou YK, Lin CH, Sung KF, Pan KT, Liu NJ. Risk Factors of Duodenobiliary Reflux-Related Dysfunction of Covered Biliary Metal Stents after Treatment of Duodenal Stricture in Patients with Malignant Biliary and Duodenal Obstruction. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3738-3747. [PMID: 34677237 PMCID: PMC8534963 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Duodenal obstruction is often accompanied with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction in patients who have undergone biliary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement. Duodenobiliary reflux (DBR) is a major cause of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after covered biliary SEMS placement. We analyzed the risk factors for DBR-related SEMS dysfunction following treatment for malignant duodenal obstruction. Sixty-one patients with covered SEMS who underwent treatment for duodenal obstruction were included. We excluded patients with tumor-related stent dysfunction (n = 6) or metal stent migration (n = 1). Fifty-four patients who underwent covered biliary SEMS placement followed by duodenal metal stenting or surgical gastrojejunostomy were included. Eleven patients had DBR-related biliary SEMS dysfunction after treatment of duodenal obstruction. There was no difference between the duodenal metal stenting group and the surgical gastrojejunostomy group. Duodenal obstruction below the papilla of Vater and a score of ≤2 on the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System after treatment for duodenal obstruction were associated with DBR-related covered biliary SEMS dysfunction. Thus, creating a reliable route for ensuring good oral intake and avoiding DBR in patients with duodenal obstruction below the papilla of Vater are both important factors in preventing DBR-related covered biliary SEMS dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Huan Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
| | - Mu-Hsien Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
| | - Yung-Kuan Tsou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
| | - Cheng-Hui Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
| | - Kai-Feng Sung
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
| | - Kuang-Tse Pan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (K.-T.P.); (N.-J.L.); Tel.: +886-3-328-1200 (ext. 8107) (N.-J.L.)
| | - Nai-Jen Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (C.-H.W.); (M.-H.L.); (Y.-K.T.); (C.-H.L.); (K.-F.S.)
- Correspondence: (K.-T.P.); (N.-J.L.); Tel.: +886-3-328-1200 (ext. 8107) (N.-J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yamao K, Kitano M, Chiba Y, Ogura T, Eguchi T, Moriyama I, Yamashita Y, Kato H, Kayahara T, Hoki N, Okabe Y, Shiomi H, Nakai Y, Kushiyama Y, Fujimoto Y, Hayashi S, Bamba S, Kudo Y, Azemoto N, Ueki T, Uza N, Asada M, Matsumoto K, Nebiki H, Takihara H, Noguchi C, Kamada H, Nakase K, Goto D, Sanuki T, Koga T, Hashimoto S, Nishikiori H, Serikawa M, Hanada K, Hirao K, Ohana M, Kazuyuki I, Kato T, Yoshida M, Kawamoto H. Endoscopic placement of covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gut 2021; 70:1244-1252. [PMID: 33223499 PMCID: PMC8223634 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stenting is an established endoscopic therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). The choice of stent (covered vs uncovered) has been examined in prior randomised studies without clear results. DESIGN In a multicentre randomised prospective study, we compared covered (CSEMS) with uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMS) in patients with mGOO; main outcomes were stent dysfunction and patient survival, with subgroup analyses of patients with extrinsic and intrinsic tumours. RESULTS Overall survival was poor with no difference between groups (probability at 3 months 49.7% for covered vs 48.4% for uncovered stents; log-rank for overall survival p=0.26). Within that setting of short survival, the proportion of stent dysfunction was significantly higher for uncovered stents (35.2% vs 23.4%, p=0.01) with significantly shorter time to stent dysfunction. This was mainly relevant for patients with extrinsic tumours (stent dysfunction rates for uncovered stents 35.6% vs 17.5%, p<0.01). Subgrouping was also relevant with respect to tumour ingrowth (lower with covered stents for intrinsic tumours; 1.6% vs 27.7%, p<0.01) and stent migration (higher with covered stents for extrinsic tumours: 15.3% vs 2.5%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Due to poor patient survival, minor differences between covered and uncovered stents may be less relevant even if statistically significant; however, subgroup analysis would suggest to use covered stents for intrinsic and uncovered stents for extrinsic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Yamao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan .,Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Chiba
- Clinical Research Center, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-sayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Eguchi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ichiro Moriyama
- Innovative Cancer Center, Shimane University Hospital, Matsue, Shimane, Japan
| | - Yukitaka Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hironari Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahisa Kayahara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Hoki
- Gastroenterology, Bell Land General Hospital, Sakai, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Okabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nakai
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Yoshifumi Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, JA Hiroshima Koseiren Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shiro Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shigeki Bamba
- Division of Clinical Nutrition, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, The Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Azemoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matuyama, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Ueki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Uza
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masanori Asada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Matsumoto
- Division of Medicine and Clinical Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nebiki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takihara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Chisio Noguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shinbeppu Hospital, Beppu, Japan
| | - Hideki Kamada
- Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Kojiro Nakase
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Japan,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tottori Red Cross Hospital, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Sanuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitaharima Medical Center, Ono, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Koga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Social Media Corporation Tenyoukai Central Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Shinichi Hashimoto
- Digestive and Life-style Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Serikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keiji Hanada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ken Hirao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masaya Ohana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
| | - Imakiire Kazuyuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imakiire General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Takao Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, Sumoto, Japan
| | - Motoyuki Yoshida
- Third department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cheung SLH, Teoh AYB. Optimal Management of Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Unresectable Malignancies. Gut Liver 2021; 16:190-197. [PMID: 34039779 PMCID: PMC8924806 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the different treatment options for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) and compare their safety and efficacy. We describe the history and evolution of gastrojejunostomy (GJ), endoscopic stenting and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) and analyze the current evidence regarding these three methods available in the literature, comparing their applicability, safety, complications and cost when used for the treatment of malignant GOO. We conclude that given the benefits of endoscopic techniques and the ability to place a stent away from the tumor, EUS-GE is a promising technique that may yield an efficacy similar to that of surgical GJ and duodenal stenting, with lower reintervention rates and fewer adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Lok Hang Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chandan S, Khan SR, Mohan BP, Shah AR, Bilal M, Ramai D, Bhogal N, Dhindsa B, Kassab LL, Singh S, Ponnada S, Nguyen AK, McDonough S, Adler DG. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E496-E504. [PMID: 33655056 PMCID: PMC7899789 DOI: 10.1055/a-1341-0788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic and surgical techniques have been utilized for palliation of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Enteral stenting (ES) is an established technique with high clinical success and low morbidity rate. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel approach that aims to provide sustained palliation of GOO. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of clinical and technical success, as well as the safety profile of EUS-GE and ES. Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2020 to identify studies that reported on safety and effectiveness of EUS-GE in comparison to ES. Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events (AEs) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 % and 95 % confidence interval. Results Five studies including 659 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled rate of technical and clinical success for EUS-GE was 95.2 % (CI 87.2-.98.3, I 2 = 42) and 93.3 % (CI 84.4-97.3, I 2 = 59) while for ES it was 96.9 % (CI 90.9-99, I 2 = 64) and 85.6 % (CI 73-92.9, I 2 = 85), respectively. Pooled rate of re-intervention was significantly lower with EUS-GE i. e. 4 % (CI 1.8-8.7, I 2 = 35) compared to ES, where it was 23.6 % (CI 17.5-31, I 2 = 35), p = 0.001 . Pooled rates of overall and major AEs were comparable between the two techniques. Conclusion EUS-GE is comparable in terms of technical and clinical effectiveness and has a similar safety profile when compared to ES for palliation of GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
| | - Shahab R. Khan
- Section of Gastroenterology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Babu P. Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Aun R. Shah
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, Unites States
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York, United States
| | - Neil Bhogal
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, Unites States
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, Unites States
| | - Lena L. Kassab
- Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Shailendra Singh
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Charleston Division, Charleston, West Virginia, United States
| | - Suresh Ponnada
- Internal Medicine, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Roanoke, Virginia, United States
| | - Andrew K. Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Stephanie McDonough
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol 2021. [PMID: 32390697 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients' survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Annalisa Cappello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jue TL, Storm AC, Naveed M, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, McRee AJ, Truty MJ, Khashab MA, Agrawal D, Al-Haddad M, Amateau SK, Buxbaum JL, Calderwood AH, DeWitt J, DiMaio CJ, Fujii-Lau LL, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Kwon RS, Law JK, Lee JK, Pawa S, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of benign and malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:309-322.e4. [PMID: 33168194 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to address key clinical questions. These include the comparison of (1) surgical gastrojejunostomy to the placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant GOO, (2) covered versus uncovered SEMS for malignant GOO, and (3) endoscopic and surgical interventions for the management of benign GOO. Recommendations provided in this document were founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, considerations of patient and caregiver preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry L Jue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mariam Naveed
- Advent Health Medical Group, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Advent Health Hospital Altamonte Springs, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Autumn J McRee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Mohammed Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart K Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - John DeWitt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Larissa L Fujii-Lau
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Suryakanth R Gurudu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joanna K Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julie Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Sachin B Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kouanda A, Binmoeller K, Hamerski C, Nett A, Bernabe J, Watson R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus open surgical gastrojejunostomy: clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:7058-7067. [PMID: 33479837 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early data suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a safe and efficacious option for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, there is a scarcity of data comparing outcomes with open gastrojejunostomy (OGJ). METHODS Single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with GOO who underwent EUS-GE or OGJ between January 1, 2014 and February 28, 2020. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were included of which 40 (60.0%) underwent EUS-GE and 26 (40.0%) underwent OGJ. Baseline characteristics were similar with respect to age (70.5 vs 69.7, p = 0.81), sex (42.5% vs 42.3% female, p = 0.99), median length of follow-up (98.0 vs 166.5 days, p = 0.8), prior failed intervention for GOO (22.5% vs 26.9%, p = 0.68), and the presence of altered anatomy (12.5% vs 30.8%, p = 0.07) between EUS-GE and OGJ, respectively. Technical success was achieved in 37 (92.5%) of EUS-GE and 26 (100%) of OGJ patients (p = 0.15). EUS-GE was associated with faster resumption of oral intake (1.3 vs 4.7 days, p < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (5 vs 14.5 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in symptom recurrence (17.5% vs 19.2%, HR 1.85, CI 0.52-6.65, p = 0.34), reintervention (20% vs 11.5%, HR 0.82, CI 0.22-3.15, p = 0.78), death within 30 days (12.5% vs 3.8%, HR 0.80, CI 0.09-6.85, p = 0.84), or 30-day readmission (17.5% vs 24.1%, HR 1.69, CI 0.53-5.41, p = 0.37) between EUS-GE and OGJ, respectively. EUS-GE patients initiated chemotherapy sooner (17.7 vs 31.3 days, p = 0.033) and had lower overall costs as compared to OGJ ($49,387 vs $124,192, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in technical or clinical success, symptom recurrence, reintervention, 30-day readmission, or 30-day mortality between EUS-GE and OGJ. EUS-GE patients experienced shorter delays to resumption of oral intake and chemotherapy, had shorter lengths of stay, and reduced hospital costs. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted to verify our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Kouanda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Kenneth Binmoeller
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA
| | - Christopher Hamerski
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA
| | - Andrew Nett
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA
| | - Jona Bernabe
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA
| | - Rabindra Watson
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA.
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Medical Center, 1101 Van Ness Ave, Rm 3158, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Choi WY, Kim HI, Park SH, Yeom JH, Jeon WJ, Kim MG. Surgical Outcomes and Survival Prognostic Factors for Palliative Gastrectomies in Stage IV Resectable Gastric Cancer Outlet Obstruction Patients. J Gastric Cancer 2020; 20:421-430. [PMID: 33425443 PMCID: PMC7781751 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Currently, there is no clear evidence to support any specific treatment as a principal therapy for stage IV gastric cancer outlet obstruction (GCOO) patients. This study evaluated the outcomes of palliative gastrectomies and survival prognostic factors in patients with stage IV resectable GCOO. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 48 stage IV GCOO patients who underwent palliative gastrectomies between June 2010 and December 2019. Palliative gastrectomies were performed only in patients with resectable disease. Early surgical outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results There were no specific risk factors for postoperative complications, except for being underweight. Severe postoperative complications developed in five patients, and most of the patients underwent interventional procedures and received broad-spectrum antibiotics for intra-abdominal abscesses. The multivariate survival analysis showed that palliative chemotherapy is a positive prognostic factor, while the specific type of hematogenous and lymphatic metastasis is a negative prognostic factor. Conclusions We recommend that the treatment method for stage IV GCOO should be selected according to each patient's physical condition and tumor characteristics. In addition, we suggest that palliative gastrectomies can be performed in stage IV resectable GCOO patients without unfavorable prognostic factors (types of hematogenous and lymphatic metastases).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Yong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea
| | - Hyun Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ho Park
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Yeom
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Jae Jeon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Gyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamamoto K, Itoi T. Recent developments in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2020. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii200031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kenjiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wu CH, Lee MH, Tsou YK, Teng W, Lin CH, Sung KF, Liu NJ. Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Duodenal Obstruction: The Papilla of Vater as a Landmark. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:10261-10269. [PMID: 33116880 PMCID: PMC7584472 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s273084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Self-expandable metal stents are used for malignant duodenal obstruction. Outcomes between stents placed above and below the papilla of Vater differ, and no study has investigated these differences. We evaluated the efficacy and adverse events of stent placement in these two locations and reported our experience with self-expandable metal stent placement in patients. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with unresectable metastatic cancers (n = 101), who underwent successful duodenal self-expandable metal stent placement between 2008 and 2018. Patients were divided into above and below the papilla of Vater groups. Patient demographics, technical and clinical outcomes, post-procedural morbidity, and stent patency were analyzed. Results Overall, 71 and 30 patients had intestinal obstruction above (including the papilla itself) and below the papilla of Vater and underwent successful stenting. Common bile duct obstruction was more common in the above-papilla group. Procedure time was similar between the groups, if an appropriate endoscope could facilitate stent placement in the below-papilla group. Both groups achieved symptomatic relief. Median stent patency duration was not significantly different between the groups; three patients had severe gastrointestinal bleeding due to postoperative vascular-enteric fistula. Conclusion Self-expandable metal stents can effectively relieve symptoms of duodenal obstructions located above and below the papilla of Vater. Duodenoscopes could facilitate stent placement if the obstruction is located below the papilla of Vater; if gastrointestinal bleeding occurs postoperatively, the possibility of vascular-enteric fistula formation should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Huan Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Mu-Hsien Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Kuan Tsou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei Teng
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hui Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Feng Sung
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Nai-Jen Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Cho B, Jung GS, Yun JH. [Percutaneous Transgastric Stent Placement for Malignant Gastroduodenal Obstruction]. TAEHAN YONGSANG UIHAKHOE CHI 2020; 81:1175-1183. [PMID: 36238027 PMCID: PMC9431874 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2019.0118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of percutaneous transgastric stent placement after the failure of treatment attempt with the transoral approach in malignant gastroduodenal obstruction patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS From October 2008 to April 2016, nine patients (M:F = 4:5; mean age = 66 years) with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction underwent stent placement via a gastrostomy tract, which was attributed to the failure of the transoral approach. The primary etiologies of the obstruction were pancreatic (n = 5), gastric (n = 2), and metastatic (n = 2) cancers. Through percutaneous gastrostomy, dual stents (inner bare metal and outer polytetrafluoroethylene-covered) were deployed at the obstruction site. The technical and clinical success rates, as well as complications were evaluated during the follow-up period. RESULTS Stents were successfully inserted in eight patients (88%). We failed to insert stent in one patient due to the presence of a tight obstruction. After stent placement, symptoms improved in seven patients. Gastrostomy tube was removed 9 to 20 days (mean = 12 days) after the stent insertion. During the mean follow-up of 136 days (range, 3-387 days), one patient developed a recurrent symptom due to tumor overgrowth. However, there were no other major complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSION Percutaneous transgastric stent placement appeared to be technically feasible and clinically effective in patients who underwent a failed transoral approach.
Collapse
|
37
|
Miwa H, Sugimori K, Kaneko T, Ishii T, Iwase S, Irie K, Sanga K, Tozuka Y, Hirotani A, Komiyama S, Sato T, Tezuka S, Goda Y, Numata K, Maeda S. Clinical outcome of a highly flexible duodenal stent for gastric outlet obstruction: A multicenter prospective study. JGH OPEN 2020; 4:729-735. [PMID: 32782963 PMCID: PMC7411653 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Endoscopic duodenal stenting for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been widespread; however, clinical trials evaluating the structures of duodenal stents are lacking. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of a highly flexible duodenal stent for GOO patients. Methods A prospective study of duodenal stenting for GOO patients from five hospitals between August 2017 and August 2018 was performed. WallFlex Duodenal Soft were used in all procedures. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as an improvement in the GOO scoring system. Results The study enrolled 31 patients (12 women, 19 men) with GOO, with a median age of 70 (range 52–90) years. Primary diseases were pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, biliary tract cancer, and others in 14, 10, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. The technical success rate was 97%, and the clinical success rate was 87%. Simultaneous biliary drainage was performed in 19% of patients. Adverse events occurred in three patients. Chemotherapy was given in 41% of clinically successful cases, and the median overall survival time after stent placement was 82 days (range, 30–341 days), and. Stent dysfunction occurred in 30% of clinically successful cases (stent ingrowth in seven and stent overgrowth in one patient). The median time to stent dysfunction was 157 days (range, 11–183 days). Six patients were treated with additional stent placement after dysfunction. Conclusion Placement of a highly flexible duodenal stent is an effective and safe treatment for patients with GOO (UMIN‐CTR 000028783).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruo Miwa
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Kazuya Sugimori
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Takashi Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital Yokohama Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ishii
- Department of Gastroenterology Saiseikai Yokohamashi Nanbu Hospital Yokohama Japan
| | - Shigeru Iwase
- Department of Gastroenterology Fujisawa City Hospital Fujisawa Japan
| | - Kuniyasu Irie
- Department of Gastroenterology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Sanga
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tozuka
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Akane Hirotani
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Satoshi Komiyama
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Takeshi Sato
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Shun Tezuka
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Goda
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Kazushi Numata
- Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Blanco GDV, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:1847-1860. [PMID: 32390697 PMCID: PMC7201143 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients’ survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Annalisa Cappello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tontini GE, Manfredi G, Orlando S, Neumann H, Vecchi M, Buscarini E, Elli L. Endoscopic ultrasonography and small-bowel endoscopy: Present and future. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:627-643. [PMID: 31090965 DOI: 10.1111/den.13429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade, impressive technological advances have occurred in ultrasonography and small-bowel endoscopy. Nowadays, endoscopic ultrasonography is an essential diagnostic tool and a therapeutic weapon for pancreatobiliary disorders. Capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy have quickly become the reference standard for the diagnosis of small-bowel luminal diseases, thereby leading to radical changes in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. We herein provide an up-to-date overview of the latest advances in endoscopic ultrasonography and small-bowel endoscopy, focusing on the emerging paradigms and technological innovations that might improve clinical practice in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Orlando
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, ASST of Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mintziras I, Miligkos M, Wächter S, Manoharan J, Bartsch DK. Palliative surgical bypass is superior to palliative endoscopic stenting in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3153-3164. [PMID: 31332564 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06955-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the two most common palliative treatment options for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Randomised trials and retrospective studies have shown discrepant results, so that there is still a controversy regarding the optimal treatment of GOO. METHODS Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing GJ to SEMS in patients with malignant GOO. Primary outcomes were survival and postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were frequency of re-interventions, major complications, time to oral intake and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies, with a total of 2.354 patients, 1.306 (55.5%) patients in the SEMS and 1.048 (44.5%) patients in the GJ group, were considered suitable for inclusion. GJ was associated with significantly longer survival than SEMS (mean difference 43 days, CI 12.00, 73.70, p = 0.006). Postoperative mortality (OR 0.55, CI 0.27, 1.16, p = 0.12) and major complications (OR 0.73, CI 0.5, 1.06, p = 0.10) were similar in both groups. The frequency of re-interventions, however, was almost three times higher in the SEMS group (OR 2.95, CI: 1.70, 5.14, p < 0.001), whereas the mean time to oral intake and length of hospital stay were shorter in the SEMS group (mean differences - 5 days, CI - 6.75, - 3.05 days, p < 0.001 and - 10 days, CI - 11.6, - 7.9 days, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients with malignant GOO and acceptable performance status should be primarily considered for a palliative GJ rather than SEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Mintziras
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Miligkos
- Laboratory of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece
| | - Sabine Wächter
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jerena Manoharan
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef Klaus Bartsch
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Adler DG. Should Patients With Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction Receive Stents or Surgery? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1242-1244. [PMID: 30503965 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tringali A, Giannetti A, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2019. [PMID: 31263354 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a variety of symptoms. It may be caused by motor disorders and by benign or malignant mechanical disease. Endoscopic management of benign disease is mainly based on balloon dilation, augmented by the use of covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in refractory disease. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used as an alternative method, although more studies with longer follow up are needed before it can be considered as a recommended therapy. Surgery remains the last resort. Endoscopic management of malignant GOO is based on SEMS placement as an alternative to palliative surgery, because it is a cost-effective method. The use of a covered or uncovered stent depends on patient-related variables, which include the stricture site, concomitant involvement of the bile duct, the patient's prognosis, probably the tumor type, and the use of chemotherapy. EUS-GE is a promising technique but needs more studies with longer follow up before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Tringali
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Aurora Giannetti
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti).,Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (DI.BI.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology, and Hepatology Department, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah USA (Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tringali A, Giannetti A, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:330-337. [PMID: 31263354 PMCID: PMC6595925 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a variety of symptoms. It may be caused by motor disorders and by benign or malignant mechanical disease. Endoscopic management of benign disease is mainly based on balloon dilation, augmented by the use of covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in refractory disease. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used as an alternative method, although more studies with longer follow up are needed before it can be considered as a recommended therapy. Surgery remains the last resort. Endoscopic management of malignant GOO is based on SEMS placement as an alternative to palliative surgery, because it is a cost-effective method. The use of a covered or uncovered stent depends on patient-related variables, which include the stricture site, concomitant involvement of the bile duct, the patient’s prognosis, probably the tumor type, and the use of chemotherapy. EUS-GE is a promising technique but needs more studies with longer follow up before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Tringali
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Aurora Giannetti
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti).,Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (DI.BI.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology, and Hepatology Department, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah USA (Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Perinel J, Adham M. Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-palliative surgery. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:28. [PMID: 31231695 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.04.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a dismal prognosis. It will probably become the second leading cause of cancer-related death within the next decade in Western countries. Over 80% of patients undergo palliative treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer due to locally advanced disease or metastases. Those patients often develop gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), obstructive jaundice and pain during the course of their disease. Symptoms such as vomiting, anorexia, pruritus and jaundice will impact the quality of life (QOL) and could delay the administration of the chemotherapy. Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer aims to relieve the symptoms durably and to improve the QOL. Palliative surgery was traditionally considered as a gold standard with the "double by-pass" including biliary-digestive and gastro-jejunal anastomosis. However, since the development of endoscopic stenting and minimally invasive surgery, the choice of the best modalities remains debated. While there is still a place for surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ) in case of duodenal or GOO, endoscopic biliary stenting during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now accepted as the gold standard in case of obstructive jaundice. In pain management, endoscopic ultrasound guided or percutaneous celiac plexus neurolysis is recommended. The selection of the best technique should consider the effectiveness and the morbidity of the treatment, the performance status of the patient and the disease stage. While endoscopic stenting is associated with earlier recovery and shorter length of stay, recurrence of symptoms and reintervention are less frequent after palliative surgery. Finally, controversy exists on whether to perform prophylactic palliative surgery in the absence of symptoms when unresectable disease is discovered during surgical exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Lyon Sud Faculty of Medicine, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Lyon Sud Faculty of Medicine, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Morita S, Suda T, Terai S. Submucosal painting for gastroduodenal stent placement. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:e64-e65. [PMID: 30664261 DOI: 10.1111/den.13349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Morita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine Niigata University Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine Niigata University Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Shuji Terai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic Palliation for Biliary and Pancreatic Malignancies: Recent Advances. Clin Endosc 2019; 52:226-234. [PMID: 30665289 PMCID: PMC6547342 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignancies of the pancreatobiliary system are usually unresectable at the time of diagnosis. As a consequence, a majority of these cases are candidates for palliative care. With advances in chemotherapeutic agents and multidisciplinary care, the survival rate in pancreatobiliary malignancies has improved. Therefore, there is a need to provide an effective and long-lasting palliative care for these patients. Endoscopic palliation is preferred to surgery as the former is associated with equal efficacy and reduced morbidity. The main role of endoscopic palliation in the vast majority of pancreatobiliary malignancies includes biliary and enteral stenting for malignant obstructive jaundice and gastric outlet obstruction, respectively. Recent advances in endoscopic palliation appear promising in imparting long-lasting relief of symptoms. Use of radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in malignant biliary obstruction has been shown to improve the survival rates as well as the patency of biliary stents. The emergence of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a therapeutic tool has enhanced the capability of minimally invasive palliation in pancreatobiliary cancers. EUS is a valuable alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the palliation of obstructive jaundice. More recently, EUS is emerging as an effective primary modality for biliary and gastric bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shen Z, Yu J, Tang H, Lu B. Closed Loop Duodenal Obstruction Secondary to Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Case Report. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2019; 22:280-286. [PMID: 30973103 DOI: 10.2174/1386207322666190411112412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma may develop into duodenal obstruction during the course of their disease. The diagnosis of obstruction can be generally achieved by means of imaging technologies. Case and Outcome We reported a rare case of pancreatic tumor with duodenal obstruction accompanied by obstructive symptoms, which was finally confirmed by laparotomy. A 68-year-old man was admitted to our department with a 3-day medical history of upper abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. The diagnosis of duodenal obstruction was established by means of various imagings including computed tomography (CT) scan, gastroscopy and upper gastrointestinal imaging. Upper gastrointestinal imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed extrinsic tumor mass was noted at the second and third portion of the duodenum accompanied by duodenal obstruction and dilatation, respectively. Laparotomy confirmed a tumor mass arising from the head and uncinate process of pancreas, which had invaded the second and third portions of the duodenum and caused closed loop obstruction. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) was performed followed by therapeutic trade-off according to intraoperative exploration. Postoperative histopathology revealed pancreatic tumor only infiltrated duodenal wall, while resection margins of pancreas, common bile duct and duodenum were all negative. The patient was cured and discharged home 12 days after surgery. CONCLUSION The present case indicated radical operation in our study appeared to be the first choice treatment for patients with malignant duodenal obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihong Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China
| | - Jianhua Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China
| | - Haijun Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China
| | - Baochun Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Despite advances in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis, morbidity remains high with survival often measured in weeks to months. Patients are often subjected to symptoms and complications that impact quality of life. Much of the management revolves around palliation of symptoms and providing support and resources to address emotional and existential concerns. This article reviews surgical and nonsurgical palliative treatments for the symptoms and complications associated with advanced, incurable peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is important that providers caring for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis be knowledgeable in the palliative management of this condition, including the usefulness of early palliative care referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Lambert
- Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue N., Worcester, MA 01608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kumar V, Ghoshal UC, Mohindra S, Saraswat VA. Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self-expandable metal stent using side- and forward-viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome. JGH OPEN 2018; 3:65-70. [PMID: 30834343 PMCID: PMC6386745 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background The endoscopic placement of a self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS), an alternative to surgical bypass for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is commonly performed using a forward‐viewing endoscope with a wide therapeutic channel; however, due to limited availability, most Indian centers use a side‐viewing duodenoscope. We studied the feasibility and outcome of SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes. Method Data of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes with a therapeutic channel for the palliation of malignant GOO presenting during a 5‐year period were analyzed retrospectively. Follow‐up data were obtained from records and telephonic interviews, and technical and clinical success, complications, and survival were evaluated. Results Of 114 patients (age 56.5 ± 11.6 years, 59 [52%] female), 90 (79%) and 24 (21%) underwent SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes, respectively. Technical (89, 98.9% vs. 24, 100%, P = ns) and clinical success (84, 93.3% vs. 23, 95.8%, P = ns) and complication rate (3, 3.3% vs. 0, P = ns) between side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes were comparable. However, SEMS could be placed in a shorter time using a forward‐ rather than side‐viewing endoscope (21 min [inter‐quartile range 19.5–35] vs. 34 min [25–45], P = < 0.001). SEMS could be deployed successfully with a forward‐viewing endoscope in two patients in whom an initial attempt using side‐viewing endoscope failed. Gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) improved following stent placement (median 0, range 0–2 vs. 2, 0–3, P = 0.0001). The survival of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes was comparable. Conclusion Although side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes are equally effective for antroduodenal SEMS placement, the procedure can be performed faster using the latter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India
| | - Uday C Ghoshal
- Department of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India
| | - Samir Mohindra
- Department of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India
| | - Vivek A Saraswat
- Department of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Palliative care is the multidisciplinary focus on patient symptoms and quality of life. The emphasis of minimally invasive surgery on reduced pain and faster recovery aligns well with the goals of palliative care. Minimally invasive approaches can be safely and effectively used to address several common complications of solid organ malignancies as well as the complications of cytotoxic therapy. A patient-centered, minimally invasive approach will not only help alleviate disabling symptoms and improve patient quality of life but will also minimize the pain and adverse effects of the intervention itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 410 West 10th Avenue, N-907, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|