1
|
Gebeyehu TF, Harrop CM, Barbieri L, Thalheimer S, Harrop J. Do Postsurgical Follow-Up Calls Reduce Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions in Neurosurgery Patients? A Quality Improvement Project in a University Hospital. World Neurosurg 2024; 188:266-275.e4. [PMID: 38763460 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unplanned 30-day readmissions after surgery are a source of patient dissatisfaction, monitored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, have financial penalties for hospitals, and are publicly reported. Neurosurgical operations have a higher 30-day unplanned readmission rate after the index discharge than other specialties. After a simple initiative for a 48-72-hour postdischarge telephone call, there was an observed significant decrease in readmission rates from 17% to 8% in 7 months at Thomas Jefferson University. To better understand the role of postoperative telephone calls in this reduction, a retrospective evaluation over a longer period was performed. METHODS A quality improvement initiative was assessed using patient records between August 2018 and May 2023. The primary observed subject is the 30-day unplanned readmission rate and secondarily a change in Physician Communication Score. Thirty-day unplanned readmission rate and Physician Communication Scores before and after the telephone call initiative were compared, checking for difference, variance, and correlation. RESULTS 874 readmissions (average, 28/month; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.3-29.3), 12.9% (95% CI, 11.9-13.9) were reported before the telephone call; of 673 readmissions (average, 26/month; 95% CI, 23-28.8), 12.9% (95% CI, 11.6-14.1) were reported after the telephone call. No significant difference, variance of scores or rates, or correlation of rate with communication score were noted before and after the initiative. CONCLUSIONS Telephone calls and peridischarge efficient communication are needed after neurologic surgery. This approach decreased unplanned readmissions in certain instances without having a significant impact on neurosurgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teleale F Gebeyehu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Catriona M Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lauren Barbieri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara Thalheimer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez AL, Cappelletti L, Kurian SM, Passio C, Rux S. Transitional Care Navigation. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151580. [PMID: 38290928 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This manuscript aims to provide an extensive review of the literature, synthesize findings, and present substantial insights on the current state of transitional care navigation. Additionally, the existing models of care, pertaining to the concept and approach to transitional care navigation, will be highlighted. METHODS An extensive search was conducted though using multiple search engines, topic-specific key terminology, eligibility of studies, as well as a limitation to only literature of existing relevance. Integrity of the evidence was established through a literature review matrix source document. A synthesis of nursing literature from organizations and professional publications was used to generate a comparison among various sources of evidence for this manuscript. Primary evidence sources consisted of peer-reviewed journals and publications from professional organizations such as the AHRQ, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and the Talbot research library. RESULTS A total of five systematic reviews (four with meta-analysis) published between 2016 and 2022 and conducted in several countries (Brazil, Korea, Singapore, and the US) were included in this review. A combined total of 105 studies were included in the systematic reviews with 53 studies included in meta-analyses. The review of the systematic reviews identified three overarching themes: care coordination, care transition, and patient navigation. Care coordination was associated with an increase in care quality rating, increased the health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed patients, reduced hospitalization rates, reduced emergency department visits, timeliness in care, and increased appropriateness of healthcare utilization. Transitional care interventions resulted to reduced average number of admissions in the intervention (I) group vs control (C) (I = 0.75, C = 1.02) 180 days after a 60-day intervention, reduced readmissions at 6 months, and reduced average number of visits 180 days after 60-day intervention (I = 2.79, C = 3.60). Nurse navigators significantly improved the timeliness of care from cancer screening to first-course treatment visit (MD = 20.42, CI = 8.74 to 32.10, P = .001). CONCLUSION The care of the cancer patient entails treatments, therapies, and follow-up care outside of the hospital setting. These transitions can be challenging as they require coordination and collaboration among various health care sites. The attributes of transitional care navigation overlap with care coordination, care transition, and patient navigation. There is an opportunity to formally develop a transitional care navigation model to effectively addresses the challenges in care transitions for patient including barriers to health professional exchange of information or communication across care settings and the complexity of coordination between care settings. The transitional care navigation and clinic model developed at a free-standing NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center is a multidisciplinary approach created to close the gaps in care from hospital to home. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE A transitional care navigation model aims to transform the existing perspectives and viewpoints of hospital discharge and transition of care to home or post-acute care settings as two solitary processes to that of a collective approach to care. The model supports provides an integrated continuum of quality, comprehensive care that supports patient compliance with treatment regimens, reinforces patient and caregiver education, and improves health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Liza Rodriguez
- Chief Nursing Officer and Vice President, Nursing and Patient Services, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Lauren Cappelletti
- Clinical Nurse Manager, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sherry M Kurian
- Advanced Practice Provider, Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christina Passio
- Clinical Director, Inpatient Services and Operations, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Susan Rux
- Associate Vice President, Nursing Education & Professional Development/Innovation, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grygorian A, Montano D, Shojaa M, Ferencak M, Schmitz N. Digital Health Interventions and Patient Safety in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e248555. [PMID: 38669018 PMCID: PMC11053376 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Over the past 2 decades, several digital technology applications have been used to improve clinical outcomes after abdominal surgery. The extent to which these telemedicine interventions are associated with improved patient safety outcomes has not been assessed in systematic and meta-analytic reviews. Objective To estimate the implications of telemedicine interventions for complication and readmission rates in a population of patients with abdominal surgery. Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were queried to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies published from inception through February 2023 that compared perioperative telemedicine interventions with conventional care and reported at least 1 patient safety outcome. Study Selection Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant studies as well as assessed the full-text articles for eligibility. After exclusions, 11 RCTs and 8 cohort studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis and 7 were included in the narrative review. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline and assessed for risk of bias by 2 reviewers. Meta-analytic estimates were obtained in random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures Number of complications, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions. Results A total of 19 studies (11 RCTs and 8 cohort studies) with 10 536 patients were included. The pooled risk ratio (RR) estimates associated with ED visits (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94) and readmissions (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78) favored the telemedicine group. There was no significant difference in the risk of complications between patients in the telemedicine and conventional care groups (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77-1.43). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that perioperative telehealth interventions are associated with reduced risk of readmissions and ED visits after abdominal surgery. However, the mechanisms of action for specific types of abdominal surgery are still largely unknown and warrant further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Grygorian
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Diego Montano
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Mahdieh Shojaa
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ferencak
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Melucci AD, Flodman K, Loria A, Swanson HL, Robinson MK, Hasselberg MJ, Evans L, Temple LK, Fleming FJ. Is there an outcome benefit? Patient engagement technology in addition to the electronic medical record patient portal following elective colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9275-9282. [PMID: 37880445 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10478-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient engagement technologies (PET) are an area of growing innovation and investment, but whether PET use in the setting of electronic medical record (EMR) supported patient portals are associated with improved outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we assessed PET and EMR activation among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery on an enhanced recovery pathway. METHODS We identified adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 1/2017 and 7/2021. EMR activations were assessed and patients were considered PET users if they used a proprietary PET application. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PET use and determine whether the level of engagement (percentage of messages read by the patient) was associated with 30-day outcomes. RESULTS 484 patients (53.5% PET users, 81.6% with an activated EMR patient portal, 30.8% ≥ 70 years of age) were included. PET users were younger, more likely to have their EMR portal activated and had decreased odds of prolonged length of stay [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.8]. Among patients ≥ 70 years, PET users had reduced odds of readmissions (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) compared to PET non-users. The most engaged PET users had decreased morbidity (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and readmissions (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) compared to the least engaged PET users. CONCLUSION When controlling for EMR activation, patients who use PET, specifically those with higher levels of engagement or aged ≥ 70, have improved outcomes following elective colorectal surgery. Interventions aimed at increasing the adoption of PET among older adults may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa D Melucci
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
- Surgical Health Outcomes & Research Enterprise (SHORE), The University of Rochester Medical Center, Saunders Research Building, Suite 124003, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Kiersten Flodman
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Anthony Loria
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Holli L Swanson
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Mary K Robinson
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Michael J Hasselberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Lara Evans
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Larissa K Temple
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Fergal J Fleming
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuce TK, Sweigert PJ, Hassanein RT, Wang TN, Himes M, Haisley KR, Perry KA. Early postoperative telehealth visit protocol implementation reduces emergency department utilization following benign foregut procedures. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8623-8627. [PMID: 37491655 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions following benign foregut surgery (BFS) represent a burden on patients and the health care system. The objective of this study was to identify differences in ED visits and readmissions before and after implementation of an early postoperative telehealth visit protocol for BFS. We hypothesized that utilization of telehealth visits would be associated with reduced post-operative ED and hospital utilization. METHODS An early postoperative telehealth protocol was initiated in 2020 at an academic medical center to provide a video conference within the first postoperative week. Consecutive elective BFS including fundoplication, Linx, paraesophageal hernia repair, and Heller myotomy performed between 2018 and 2022 were included. Outcomes included ED visits and 30-day readmission. Bivariate analyses were performed using Chi-squared testing for categorical variables. The association between telehealth visits and outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS 616 patients underwent BFS during the study period. 310 (50.3%) were performed prior to the implementation of telehealth visits and 306 (49.7%) were after. 241 patients in the telehealth visit group (78.8%) completed their telehealth visit. A total of 34 patients (5.5%) had ED visits without readmission while 38 patients (6.2%) were readmitted within the first 30 days. The most common cause of ED visits and readmissions included pain (n = 18, 25%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 12, 16%). There was a significant reduction in ED visits without admission following telehealth visit implementation (7.4% vs 3.6%; OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.04-4.65, p = 0.04). There was no difference in readmission rates (6.1% versus 6.5%; OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.46-1.73, p = 0.73). The telehealth cohort had significantly lower ED visits for pain (31% vs 16.7%, p = 0.04) and nausea/vomiting (23.8% vs 6.7%, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION Early telehealth follow-up was associated with a significant decrease in ED visits following BFS. The majority of this was attributable to a reduction in ED visits for pain, nausea, and vomiting. These results provide a possible avenue for improving quality and cost-effectiveness within this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik K Yuce
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Patrick J Sweigert
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Roukaya T Hassanein
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Theresa N Wang
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Melissa Himes
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Kelly R Haisley
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Kyle A Perry
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12Th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McLean KA, Knight SR, Diehl TM, Varghese C, Ng N, Potter MA, Zafar SN, Bouamrane MM, Harrison EM. Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e295-e315. [PMID: 37100544 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of digital health interventions (DHIs) for remote postoperative monitoring have been developed and evaluated. This systematic review identifies DHIs for postoperative monitoring and evaluates their readiness for implementation into routine health care. Studies were defined according to idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up (IDEAL) stages of innovation. A novel clinical innovation network analysis used coauthorship and citations to examine collaboration and progression within the field. 126 DHIs were identified, with 101 (80%) being early stage innovations (IDEAL stage 1 and 2a). None of the DHIs identified had large-scale routine implementation. There is little evidence of collaboration, and there are clear omissions in the evaluation of feasibility, accessibility, and the health-care impact. Use of DHIs for postoperative monitoring remains at an early stage of innovation, with promising but generally low-quality supporting evidence. Comprehensive evaluation within high-quality, large-scale trials and real-world data are required to definitively establish readiness for routine implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth A McLean
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas M Diehl
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nathan Ng
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark A Potter
- Colorectal Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Syed Nabeel Zafar
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Matt-Mouley Bouamrane
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ewen M Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitchell J, Li X, Decker PJ. Community-Level Characteristics of Timely PCP Follow-Up Care and Post-Discharge ER Usage. Hosp Top 2023; 101:1-8. [PMID: 34308782 DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1955061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Achieving equitable access has been a central goal in healthcare for years; access by low-income Americans is a major concern for policymakers. We examined the differences in post-discharge primary care follow-up visits and 30-day post discharge ER visits across several characteristics. The results suggest that higher housing density, percent minority population, percent unemployed, and percent uninsured point to lower rates of PCP follow-up care and higher rates of post-discharge ER visits. These findings have implications for developing cost-effective programs targeting hospital to PCP communication, especially in densely populated areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Mitchell
- Healthcare Administration Program, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiao Li
- Healthcare Administration Program, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Phillip J Decker
- Healthcare Administration Program, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Mobile Phone App Improves Patient-Physician Communication and Reduces Emergency Department Visits After Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:130-137. [PMID: 34933314 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency visits after colorectal surgery are common and require significant health care resources. However, many visits may be avoidable with alternative access to care. Mobile health technologies can facilitate patient access to health care providers. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that a mobile app for postdischarge monitoring with patient-provider communication ability would reduce emergency visits after elective abdominopelvic colorectal surgery. DESIGN This is a prospective cohort study with a regression analysis after coarsened exact matching. SETTING The study was conducted at a single colorectal referral center from May 2019 to September 2020. PATIENTS A total of 114 patients were recruited to the intervention and were matched to a retrospective cohort of 608 patients from the 24 months before the study. All patients were managed according to an enhanced recovery pathway. INTERVENTIONS A mobile phone app comprised of patient education material, daily questionnaires assessing postdischarge recovery, and patient-provider chat function was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes included potentially preventable 30-day emergency visits defined according to a validated algorithm. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, total emergency department visits, readmissions, and app usability. RESULTS Coarsened-exact matching resulted in a matched sample of 94 prospective intervention patients and 256 retrospective control patients. The prospective group was associated with fewer preventable emergency department visits (incidence rate ratio 0.34; p = 0.043) and shorter length of stay (-1.62 days; p = 0.011). There were no differences in 30-day complications, total number of emergency visits, or readmissions. Patient-reported usability of the mobile app was high, with 88% of patients reporting that the app improved their ability to communicate with their surgeon. LIMITATIONS We did not account for patient activation or perform a cost-analysis. CONCLUSION Use of a mobile app was associated with fewer potentially preventable emergency visits and shorter length of stay after major elective colorectal surgery, which may be due to enhanced postdischarge monitoring and patient-provider communication. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B878 . APLICACIN DE TELFONO MVIL MEJORA LA COMUNICACIN ENTRE MDICO Y PACIENTE Y REDUCE LAS VISITAS AL DEPARTAMENTO DE EMERGENCIAS DESPUS DE CIRUGA COLORECTAL ANTECEDENTES:Las visitas de emergencia después de la cirugía colorrectal son frecuentes y requieren importantes recursos sanitarios. Sin embargo, muchas visitas pueden evitarse con un acceso alternativo a la atención. Las tecnologías de salud móviles pueden facilitar el acceso de los pacientes a los proveedores de atención médica.OBJETIVO:Se planteó la hipótesis de que una aplicación móvil para el seguimiento posterior al alta con capacidad de comunicación entre el paciente y el médico reduciría las visitas de emergencia después de cirugía colorrectal abdominopélvica electiva.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte prospectivo con un análisis de regresión después de un emparejamiento exacto aproximado.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un solo centro de referencia colorrectal entre 05/2019 y 09/2020.PACIENTES:Se reclutó un total de 114 pacientes para la intervención y se emparejaron con una cohorte retrospectiva de 608 pacientes de los 24 meses anteriores al estudio. Todos los pacientes fueron tratados con protocolo de enhanced recovery .INTERVENCIONES:Se utilizó una aplicación para teléfono móvil compuesta de material educativo para el paciente, cuestionarios diarios que evalúan la recuperación posterior al alta y una función de chat entre el paciente y el médico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados primarios incluyeron visitas a la emergencia en 30 días potencialmente prevenibles, definidas según un algoritmo validado. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la duración de la estancia, complicaciones, total de visitas al departamento de emergencias, reingresos y la usabilidad de la aplicación.RESULTADOS:El emparejamiento aproximado-exacto resultó en una muestra emparejada de 94 APP + y 256 APP-. APP + se asoció con menos visitas evitables al servicio de urgencias (IRR 0,34, p = 0,043) y una estancia más corta (-1,62 días, p = 0,011). No hubo diferencias en las complicaciones a los 30 días, número total de visitas de emergencia y reingresos. La usabilidad de la aplicación móvil informada por los pacientes fue alta, y el 88% de los pacientes informaron que la aplicación mejoró su capacidad para comunicarse con su cirujano.LIMITACIONES:No contabilizamos la activación del paciente ni realizamos un análisis de costos.CONCLUSIÓNES:El uso de una aplicación móvil se asoció con menos visitas a la emergencia potencialmente prevenibles y una estadía más corta después de una gran cirugía colorrectal electiva, lo que puede deberse a una mejor monitorización posterior al alta y a la comunicación entre el paciente y el médico. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B878 . (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).
Collapse
|
9
|
A comprehensive analysis of 30-day readmissions after emergency general surgery procedures: Are risk factors modifiable? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 94:61-67. [PMID: 36221175 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modifiable risk factors associated with procedure-related 30-day readmission after emergency general surgery (EGS) have not been comprehensively studied. We set out to determine risk factors associated with EGS procedure-related 30-day unplanned readmissions. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database (2013-2019). It included nine surgical procedures encompassing 80% of the burden of EGS diseases, performed on an urgent/emergent basis. The procedures were classified as low risk (open and laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and high risk (open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic and open colectomy, lysis of adhesions, perforated ulcer repair, small bowel resection, and exploratory laparotomy). Data on patient characteristics, admission status, procedure risk, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 312,862 patients were included (16,306 procedure-related 30-day readmissions [5.2%]). Thirty-day readmission patients were older, had higher American Association of Anesthesiology scores, were more often underweighted or markedly obese, and were more frequently presented with sepsis. Risk factors associated with EGS procedure-related 30-day unplanned readmissions included age older than 40 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.15), American Association of Anesthesiology ≥3 (AOR, 1.41), sepsis present at the time of surgery (AOR, 1.84), body mass index <18 kg/m 2 (AOR, 1.16), body mass index ≥40 kg/m 2 (AOR, 1.12), high-risk procedures (AOR, 1.51), LOS ≥4 d (AOR, 2.04), and discharge except to home (AOR, 1.33). Thirty-day readmissions following low-risk procedures occurred at a median of 5 days (interquartile range, 2-11 days) and 6 days (interquartile range, 3-11 days) after high-risk procedures. Surgical site infections, postoperative sepsis, wound disruption, and thromboembolic events were more prevalent in the 30-day readmission group. Mortality rate was fourfold higher in the 30-day readmission group (2.4% vs. 0.6%). CONCLUSION We identified several unmodifiable patients and EGS disease-related factors associated with 30-day unplanned readmissions. Readmissions could be potentially reduced by the implementation of a postdischarge surveillance systems between hospitals and postdischarge destination facilities, leveraging telehealth and outpatient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
Collapse
|
10
|
Moon J, Pang A, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M. Early discharge after colorectal cancer resection: trends and impact on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6617-6628. [PMID: 34988738 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of early discharge in colorectal surgery has been effective in improving patient satisfaction and reducing healthcare costs. Readmission rates following early discharge among colorectal cancer patients are believed to be low, however, remain understudied. The objectives of this study were: (i) to describe trends in early post-operative discharge and the associated hospitalization costs; (ii) to explore patient outcomes and resource utilization following early discharge; and (ii) to identify predictors of readmission following early discharge. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Adult patients admitted with a primary colorectal neoplasm who underwent colectomy or proctectomy between 2010 and 2017 were identified using ICD-9/10 codes. The exposure of interest was early post-operative discharge defined as ≤ 3 days from surgery. Main outcome measures were 30-day readmissions, post-operative complication rates, LOS and cost. RESULTS In total, 342,242 patients were identified, and of those, 51,977 patients (15.2%) had early discharges. During the study period, the proportion of early discharges significantly increased (R2 = 0.94), from 9.9 to 23.4%, while readmission rates in this group remained unchanged (mean 7.3% ± 0.5). Complications that required bounceback readmission (within 7 days) after early discharge, rather than during index admission, were an independent predictor of longer overall LOS (ß = 0.044, p < 0.001) and higher hospitalization costs (ß = 0.031, p < 0.001). On multiple logistic regression, factors independently associated with bounceback readmission following early discharge were: male gender (OR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.33-1.63); open surgery (OR = 1.37, 95%CI 1.23-1.52); presence of stoma (OR = 1.51, 95%CI 1.22-1.87); transfer to facility or discharge with home health service (OR = 1.53, 95%CI 1.34-1.75); and Medicare/Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.14-1.57), among others. CONCLUSION Early post-operative discharge of colorectal cancer patients is increasing despite a lack of improvement in readmission rates and an overall increase in hospitalization costs. Premature discharge of select patients may result in readmissions due to critical complications related to surgery resulting in increased resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongyoon Moon
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Allison Pang
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Julio Faria
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nancy Morin
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Marylise Boutros
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kowa CY, Jin Z, Gan TJ. Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways. J Anesth 2022; 36:648-660. [PMID: 35789291 PMCID: PMC9255474 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has led to a considerable paradigm shift towards evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care. Such pathways are now widely implemented in a variety of surgical specialties, with largely positive results. In this narrative review, we summarize the principles, components and implementation of ERPs, focusing on recent developments in the field. We also discuss ‘special cases’ in ERPs, including: surgery in frail patients; emergency procedures; and patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Ying Kowa
- Department of Anaesthesia, Whittington Hospital, Magdala Ave, London, N19 5NF, UK
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:6251-6261. [PMID: 35459953 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07033-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementing effective strategies to transition care for individuals with colorectal cancer is an important tool to qualify care for affected individuals, as well as contribute to the dispensation of continuous and quality care to patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to transition from hospital care to the community compared to usual care for colorectal cancer patients to reduce hospital stay, readmissions at 30 days, and visit to the emergency department up to 30 days. METHOD Systematic review and meta-analysis followed the recommendations of PRISMA statement, with protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,020,162,249). Searches were carried out in May 2020 in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The measure of effect used for dichotomous outcomes was relative risk, and for continuous outcomes, the difference of means was used, with their confidence intervals of 95%. Heterogeneity was evaluated using inconsistency statistics. RESULTS Of 631 identified studies, seven studies were included. The meta-analysis of the studies showed a reduction in readmissions at 30 days of 32% and a significant reduction in hospital stay time of approximately one and a half days, both of which were analyzed in favor of the group of care transition interventions. CONCLUSION The findings showed effective care transition strategies for the transition of colorectal cancer patients, such as post-discharge active surveillance program, standardized protocol of improved recovery, and telephone follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42020162249.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sweet AL, Sutton TL, Curtis KA, Knapp N, Sheppard BC, Zink KA. Characterizing 30-d Postoperative Acute Care Visits: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Collaborative Analysis. J Surg Res 2022; 276:1-9. [PMID: 35325679 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many postoperative acute care visits (PACVs) are likely more appropriately addressed in lower acuity settings; however, the frequency and nature of PACVs are not currently tracked by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and the overall burden to emergency departments and urgent care centers is unknown. METHODS NSQIP collaborative data were augmented to prospectively capture 30-d PACVs for 1 y starting October 2018 across all NSQIP specialties, including visit reason and disposition. Data were analyzed using binomial logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 9933 patients were identified; 12.0% (n = 1193) presented to an acute care setting over 1413 visits, most commonly for surgical pain (15.4%) in the absence of an identified complication. Visits most commonly resulted in discharge (n = 817, 68.5%) or admission (n = 343, 24.3%). Variables independently associated with visits resulting in discharge included age (odds ratio [OR] 0.99 per year, P < 0.001), increasing comorbidities (1-2 [OR 1.55, P < 0.001]; 3-4 [OR 2.51, P < 0.001]; 5+ [OR 2.79 P < 0.001]), operative duration (OR 1.08 per hour, P = 0.001), and nonelective (OR 1.20, P = 0.01) or urologic (OR 1.46, P = 0.01) procedures. CONCLUSIONS PACVs are an overlooked burden on emergency medicine providers and healthcare systems; most do not require admission and could be potentially triaged outside of the acute care setting with improved perioperative care infrastructure. Younger patients, those with multiple comorbidities, and those undergoing nonelective procedures deserve special attention when designing initiatives to address postoperative acute care utilization. Data regarding PACVs can be routinely collected with minor modifications to current NSQIP workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L Sweet
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Thomas L Sutton
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Krista A Curtis
- Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Oregon Health & Science University Health Systems, Portland, Oregon
| | - Nathan Knapp
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Brett C Sheppard
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Karen A Zink
- Department of Surgery, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meyenfeldt EMV, van Nassau F, de Betue CTI, Barberio L, Schreurs WH, Marres GMH, Bonjer HJ, Anema J. Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051513. [PMID: 34987041 PMCID: PMC8734011 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands. SETTING Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs. PARTICIPANTS A broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative. INTERVENTIONS Semistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES Determinants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. RESULTS Several determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data. CONCLUSIONS Based on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik M von Meyenfeldt
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Femke van Nassau
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Carlijn T I de Betue
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - L Barberio
- Patient Advocacy Group, Longkanker Nederland, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmina H Schreurs
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Geertruid M H Marres
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Anema
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article considers how postacute care (PAC) facilities such as skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals could represent an opportunity for outpatient surgical facilities to improve patient care. In order to understand how these facilities interact with outpatient surgical services, it is first necessary to understand the types of facilities that provide PAC. RECENT FINDINGS The significant costs associated with PAC have led to some proposed regulatory changes. Evidence examining postacute costs following total joint replacement has indicated that these costs may be decreased with cooperative efforts between perioperative physicians and PAC facilities. However, the lack of currently published data on the interaction between outpatient surgery and inpatient PAC facilities creates a need to explore how greater cooperation between these types of facilities could lead to improvements in patient care. SUMMARY PAC facilities are inpatient facilities focused on the rehabilitation of patients recovering from an acute illness or surgical intervention. This article seeks to provide ambulatory practitioners a fundamental understanding of PAC as a starting point for future collaborative efforts with PAC facilities; improving care for patients referred to and from PAC facilities for outpatient surgical care.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dawes AJ, Lin AY, Varghese C, Russell MM, Lin AY. Mobile health technology for remote home monitoring after surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1304-1314. [PMID: 34661649 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) technology has been proposed as a method of improving post-discharge surveillance. Little is known about how mHealth has been used to track patients after surgery and whether its use is associated with differences in postoperative recovery. METHODS Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials) were searched to identify studies published between January 1999 and February 2021. Mobile health was defined as any smartphone or tablet computer capable of electronically capturing health-related patient information and transmitting these data to the clinical team. Comparable outcomes were pooled via meta-analysis with additional studies compiled via narrative review. The quality of each study was assessed based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. RESULTS Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. While the majority of devices were designed to capture general health information, others were specifically adapted to the expected outcomes or potential complications of the index procedure. Exposure to mHealth was associated with fewer emergency department visits (odds ratio 0.42, 95 per cent c.i. 0.23 to 0.79) and readmissions (odds ratio 0.47, 95 per cent c.i. 0.29 to 0.77) as well as accelerated improvements in quality of life after surgery. There were limited data on other postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION Remote home monitoring via mHealth is feasible, adaptable, and may even promote more effective postoperative care. Given the rapid expansion of mHealth, physicians and policymakers need to understand these technologies better so that they can be integrated into high-quality clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Dawes
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - A Y Lin
- Department of Surgery, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.,Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia (Wellington), University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - C Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - M M Russell
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - A Y Lin
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eustache J, El-Kefraoui C, Ekmekjian T, Latimer E, Lee L. Do postoperative telemedicine interventions with a communication feature reduce emergency department visits and readmissions?-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:5889-5904. [PMID: 34231068 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08607-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions after surgery are common and represent a significant cost-burden on the healthcare system. A notable portion of these unplanned visits are the result of expected complications or normal recovery after surgery, suggesting that improved coordination and communication in the outpatient setting could potentially prevent these. Telemedicine can improve patient-physician communication and as such may have a role in limiting unplanned emergency department visits and readmissions in postoperative patients. METHODS Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in surgical patients examining the effect of postoperative telemedicine interventions with a communication feature on 30-day readmissions and emergency department visits as compared to current standard postoperative follow-up. All surgical subspecialties were included. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias using standardized tools. Our primary outcomes of interest were 30-day ED visits and readmissions. Our secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction with the intervention. RESULTS 29 studies were included in the final analysis. Fourteen studies were RCTs, and the remaining fifteen were cohort studies. Eighteen studies reported 30-day ED visit as an outcome. There was no overall reduction in 30-day ED visit in the telemedicine group (RR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.70-1.12). Twenty-two studies reported 30-day readmission as an outcome. The overall pooled estimate did not show a difference in this outcome (RR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.74-1.09). Fifteen studies reported a metric of patient satisfaction regarding utilization of the telemedicine intervention. All studies demonstrated high levels of satisfaction (> 80%) with the telemedicine intervention. DISCUSSION This review fails to demonstrate a clear reduction ED visits and readmissions to support use of a telemedicine intervention across the board. This may be in part explained by significant heterogeneity in the proportions of potentially preventable visits in each surgical specialty. As such, targeting interventions to specific surgical settings may prove most useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules Eustache
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Campus-DS1.3310, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Taline Ekmekjian
- Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric Latimer
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Douglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Campus-DS1.3310, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. .,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simon BA, Assel MJ, Tin AL, Desai P, Stabile C, Baron RH, Cracchiolo JR, Twersky RS, Vickers AJ, Laudone VP. Association Between Electronic Patient Symptom Reporting With Alerts and Potentially Avoidable Urgent Care Visits After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:740-746. [PMID: 34076691 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Increasingly complex surgical procedures are being performed in the outpatient setting, increasing the burden on patients and caregivers to manage their postoperative symptoms. Electronic patient-reported symptom tracking may reduce this burden and help patients distinguish between expected symptoms and those requiring intervention. Objective To determine whether electronic symptom reporting with clinical alerts for 10 days after ambulatory cancer surgery is associated with a reduction in potentially avoidable urgent care visits, defined as a visit not leading to admission. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Josie Robertson Surgery Center (JRSC), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's ambulatory surgery center with overnight stay capacity from September 20, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Patients undergoing prostatectomy, nephrectomy, mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, hysterectomy, or thyroidectomy at the surgery center before (n = 4195) and after (n = 2970) implementation of the Recovery Tracker (RT) electronic postoperative symptom survey were included. Data analyses were conducted from February 1 to November 24, 2020. Exposures A short electronic survey assessing symptoms daily for 10 days after surgery, administered via the patient portal, with alerts to the clinical team and follow-up for concerning responses. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was Memorial Sloan Kettering urgent care center visits with and without readmission and any readmission within 30 days after surgery. Nursing workload was measured by patient phone calls, emails, and secure messages as documented in the electronic medical record. Results A total of 7165 patients were analyzed, including 4195 (median age, 53 [interquartile range (IQR), 44-63] years; 3490 women [83%]) from the pre-RT implementation period and 2970 (median age, 56 [IQR, 46-65] years; 2221 women [75%]) from after full implementation. On multivariable, intent-to-treat analysis by study period, having surgery in the post-RT period was associated with a 22% decrease in the odds of an urgent care center visit without readmission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-1.00; P = .047). Having responded to at least 1 survey was associated with a 42% reduction in the odds of an urgent care center visit without readmission (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87; P = .007). There was no change in the risk of admission. Nursing calls increased by a mean of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) calls per patient after RT implementation (P < .001), a 34% increase. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, electronic symptom reporting with nursing follow-up for clinical alerts was associated with a reduction in potentially avoidable urgent care visits. The low risk and high benefit of this intervention suggest that these systems should be more broadly implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A Simon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Melissa J Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Priyanka Desai
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cara Stabile
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roberta H Baron
- Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Rebecca S Twersky
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vincent P Laudone
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
High incidence of potentially preventable emergency department visits after major elective colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2653-2660. [PMID: 33959806 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08514-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department (ED) visits after surgery represent a significant cost burden on the healthcare system. Furthermore, many ED visits are related to issues of healthcare delivery services and may be avoidable. Few studies have assessed the reasons for ED visits after colorectal surgery. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify the reasons why patients presented to the ED within 30 postoperative days and (2) determine if these visits were potentially preventable. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted on elective major colorectal surgery cases performed in a single center between 01/2017 and 07/2019. Data collected included demographics, medical history, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, ED visits within 30 postoperative days, and readmissions. Each ED visit was assessed by two reviewers and graded on a scale adapted from the New York University ED algorithm. The gradings were: (1) non-emergent, (2) emergent but treatable in an ambulatory setting, (3) emergent/ED-care required but preventable if timely outpatient care was available, and (4) emergent/ED-care required and non-preventable. Grades 1-3 were deemed potentially preventable. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of potentially preventable visits. RESULTS Six hundred and twenty five patients were included in the final analysis. 110 (17.6%) patients presented to the ED within 30 days. The most common cause of ED visit were ileus/small bowel obstruction (SBO) (16.4%), superficial wound infection (15.5%), genitourinary issues (10.9%), and non-infectious gastrointestinal issues (nausea, malnutrition, diarrhea, high output stomas) (10.9%). After review, 51.8% of visits were considered potentially preventable (Grade 1-3). The most common causes of preventable ED visits were superficial wound infection (24.6%), non-infectious gastrointestinal issues (19.3%), and minor bleeding (14.0%). Creation of a new stoma was the only independent risk factor for potentially preventable ED visits (OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.03-4.47). CONCLUSION Approximately half of ED visits within 30 days of discharge were potentially preventable. These findings indicate a need to improve access to outpatient care to reduce preventable ED visits after elective colorectal surgery.
Collapse
|
20
|
Studniarek A, Borsuk DJ, Kochar K, Park JJ, Marecik SJ. Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:501-508. [PMID: 33094353 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03782-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly when paired with advanced laparoscopy, have reduced recovery time following colorectal procedures. The aim of this study was to determine if length of stay (LOS) could be reduced to an overnight observation stay (< 24 h) with comparable perioperative morbidity. The secondary aim was to establish predictive factors contributing to early discharge. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of all colectomies at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and January 2019. Inclusion criteria included all colorectal resections with varying surgical approaches. Patients underwent a standardized ERAS protocol. A logistical regression model was conducted for predictive factors. RESULTS Three hundred sixty patients were included (55.3% female). Of these, 78 (21.7%) patients were discharged within < 24 h and 112 (31.1%) were discharged within 24-48 h. The remainder comprised the > 48 h group. Age differed significantly between the < 24 h and 24-48 h groups (p < 0.0001). Patients discharged within 24 h were younger (59.4 ± 12.3 years), had a lower CCI score (3.1; p = 0.0026), and lower ASA class (p < 0.0001). Emergency department visits (p = 0.3329) and readmissions (p = 0.6453) prior to POD 30 remained comparable among all groups. Younger age, low ASA, and minimally invasive surgical approach all contributed to ultra-fast discharge. CONCLUSION ERAS protocols may allow for discharge within 24 h following a major colorectal resection, all with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive factors for discharge within 24 h include a low ASA (I or II), and a minimally invasive surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Studniarek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite 107, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA
| | - Daniel J Borsuk
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite 107, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA
| | - Kunal Kochar
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite 107, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA.,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John J Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite 107, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA
| | - Slawomir J Marecik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite 107, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA. .,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Willrich Boell JE, Flores Trindade L, Bernat Kolankiewicz AC, Cañon-Montañez W, Pituskin E, Lorenzini E. Care Transitions of Colorectal Cancer Patients from Hospital to Community: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol. REVISTA CUIDARTE 2021. [DOI: 10.15649/cuidarte.2285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of care transition strategies from hospital-to-community compared to usual care for patients with colorectal cancer to reduce hospital stay, 30-day readmissions, and emergency room visits up to 30 days. Methods: Systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol that followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020162249). We will include studies available in the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and LILACS with care transition strategies/actions from hospital to community as the primary outcome. Eligible studies will be selected, and data will be combined and synthesized using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software. We will combine risk ratios or odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data using a random effects model. Discussion: This review will contribute to the practice and development of effective and safe care transition strategies from hospital to community for colorectal cancer patients. There is an expectation that this review will provide much needed evidence that effective care transitions could reduce short term hospital readmission, and may thus provide added value in the care of colorectal cancer patients. Conclusion: The results of the review will be used to provide clear recommendations for hospital and primary care management to improve care transitions and, as a result, also improve integration in the healthcare system.
Collapse
|
22
|
Borsuk DJ, Studniarek A, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Kochar K. Protocol-Based Intravenous Fluid Hydration for Newly Created Ileostomies Decreases Readmissions Secondary to Dehydration. Am Surg 2020; 87:897-902. [PMID: 33280399 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820971574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newly created ileostomies often result in patient readmission due to dehydration secondary to high ostomy output. Implementation of a mandatory home intravenous hydration protocol can avoid this. We aim to evaluate the impact of mandatory home intravenous hydration for patients with newly created ileostomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients at a single, tertiary care center who underwent ileostomy creation during a period of sporadic home intravenous hydration (February 2011-December 2013) and mandatory protocol hydration (March 2016-December 2018) were reviewed for incidence of dehydration, readmissions, and emergency department visits. RESULTS 241 patients were evaluated. 119 were in the "sporadic" group and 122 were in the "protocol" group. Operative approach differed among both groups, with hydration protocol patients undergoing 15% less open procedures and 4.9% more hand-assisted laparoscopic procedures (P = .0017). Prior to protocol implementation, 23.5% of patients were sent home with intravenous hydration. Length of hospital stay after index ileostomy creation was shorter for "protocol" patients by 3.3 days (P < .0001). 15.1% of "sporadic" patients experienced dehydration as compared to 7.4% of "protocol" patients (P = .0283). Following protocol implementation, the number of patients readmitted due to dehydration increased from 13 to 14 (P = .01). DISCUSSION Standardized, mandatory at-home intravenous hydration following ileostomy creation leads to a significant reduction in postoperative incidence of dehydration and dehydration-associated readmissions. This protocol should be followed for all patients with newly created ileostomies, so long as adequate home health nursing support and active surveillance are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Borsuk
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 21886Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Adam Studniarek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 21886Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 14681University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Slawomir J Marecik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 21886Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 14681University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John J Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 21886Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Kunal Kochar
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 21886Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
von Glinski A, Ishak B, Elia CJ, Goodmanson R, Pierre C, Norvell DC, Ansari D, Brune P, Oskouian RJ, Chapman JR. Emerging Insight in the Use of an Active Post Discharge Surveillance Program in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Pilot Study. World Neurosurg 2020; 139:e237-e244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
24
|
Pang J, Crawford K, Faraji F, Ramsey C, Kemp A, Califano JA. An Analysis of 1-Year Charges for Head and Neck Cancer: Targets for Value-Based Interventions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163:546-553. [PMID: 32450778 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820921401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the dominant clinical factors associated with increased 1-year charges in treating head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Single academic institution. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1-year charges for 196 consecutive patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who were treated exclusively at our institution. We analyzed charges by department as well as factors associated with increased charges per multivariable regression. RESULTS The mean age was 59.6 years (SD, 14.9). Most of the population was male (64%), white (70%), and commercially insured (46%). The most common primary sites were the oropharynx (25%; 76%, HPV positive), skin (19%), and thyroid (17%). Eighty-three percent of total charges were due to standard-of-care treatment for HNC: surgery ($16 million), radiation therapy ($22 million), or chemotherapy ($11 million). The median total charge per patient was $212,484 (interquartile range, $78,630-$475,823). Multivariable regression demonstrated that the following were associated with increased charges: nasopharynx subsite ($250,929 [95% CI, $93,290-$408,569]; effect size in US dollars, P = .002), advanced stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer, seventh edition; $80,331 [$22,726-$137,936], P = .007), therapeutic surgery ($281,893 [$117,371-$446,415], P = .001), chemotherapy ($183,331 [$125,497-$241,165], P < .001), radiation ($203,397 [$143,454-$263,341], P < .001), surgical complication requiring return to the operating room ($147,247 [$37,240-$257,254], P = .009), emergency department visits ($89,050 [$23,811-$154,289], P = .008), and admissions ($140,894 [$82,895-$198,893], P < .001; constant, -$233,927 [-$410,790 to -$57,064]). The top quartile accrued 55% of the total charges. CONCLUSION Radiation, followed by surgery and chemotherapy, were the most expensive components of HNC care. In this analysis, we identified the dominant clinical factors associated with increased charges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pang
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kayva Crawford
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Farhoud Faraji
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Celia Ramsey
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Kemp
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Joseph A Califano
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|