1
|
Su HJ, Chen CC, Kuo YT, Han ML, Tsai MC, Liu KL, Wang HP. Clinical outcomes of different types of metallic stents in malignant distal duodenum stenosis: A retrospective study. J Formos Med Assoc 2024; 123:854-859. [PMID: 38171957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Endoscopic stenting at malignant distal duodenum stenosis (MDDS) is challenging because of the duodenal C-loop configuration, the acute angle of the duodenojejunal junction, and the limited length of the endoscope. Few studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of stenting at the distal duodenum. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of treating MDDS with different types of metallic stents. METHODS From January 2012 to December 2020, fifty-six patients with MDDS who underwent duodenal stenting were enrolled for analysis. Thirty-five patients received uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (UC-SEMS), and twenty-one patients received partially covered self-expandable metallic stents (PC-SEMS). All patients were followed up till death or for 18 months. The clinical success rate, stent dysfunction rate, and stent patency were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors related to stent dysfunction. RESULTS The clinical success rates were 85.7 % in both the UC-SEMS and PC-SEMS groups. Stent dysfunction rates (UC-SEMS: 34.3 %, PC-SEMS: 38.1 %, p = 0.773) and the average stent patency (UC-SEMS: 117.2 days, PC-SEMS: 100.0 days, p = 0.576) were not statistically different between the groups. Multivariate analysis disclosed the age ≥65 years was significantly related to stent dysfunction (odds ratio: 4.78, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Both UC-SEMS and PC-SEMS are safe and effective treatment options for MDDS. However, stent dysfunction remains a significant issue to overcome, particularly in the elderly. Further research is needed to explore novel strategies that can improve the effectiveness of stent placement and reduce the risk of stent dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hau-Jyun Su
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ting Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Endoscopy, Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Lun Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Endoscopy, Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chang Tsai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kao-Lang Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinet E, Gonzalez JM, Thobois M, Hamouda I, Hardwigsen J, Chopinet S, Pauleau G, Vanbiervliet G, Onana P, Moutardier V, Gasmi M, Barthet M, Birnbaum DJ. Surgical versus endoscopic gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective multicentric comparative study of technical and clinical success. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:192. [PMID: 38900214 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03365-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is mainly due to advanced malignant disease. GOO can be treated by surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), endoscopic enteral stenting (EES), or endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) to improve the quality of life. METHODS Between 2009 and 2022, patients undergoing SGE or EUS-GE for GOO were included at three centers. Technical and clinical success rates, post-procedure adverse events (AEs), length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day all-cause mortality, and recurrence of GOO were retrospectively analyzed and compared between SGE and EUS-GE. Predictive factors for technical and clinical failure after SGE and EUS-GE were identified. RESULTS Of the 97 patients included, 56 (57.7%) had an EUS-GE and 41 (42.3%) had an SGE for GOO, with 62 (63.9%) GOO due to malignancy and 35 (36.1%) to benign disease. The median follow-up time was 13,4 months (range 1 days-106 months), with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.962). Technical (p = 0.133) and clinical (p = 0.229) success rates, severe morbidity (p = 0.708), 30-day all-cause mortality (p = 0.277) and GOO recurrence (p = 1) were similar. EUS-GE had shorter median procedure duration (p < 0.001), lower post-procedure ileus rate (p < 0.001), and shorter median LOS (p < 0.001) than SGE. In univariate analysis, no risk factors for technical or clinical failure in SGE were identified and abdominal pain reported before the procedure was a risk factor for technical failure in the EUS-GE group. No risk factor for clinical failure was identified for EUS-GE. In the subgroup of GOO due to benign disease, SGE was associated with better technical success (p = 0.035) with no difference in clinical success rate compared to EUS-GE (p = 1). CONCLUSION EUS-GE provides similar long-lasting symptom relief as SGE for GOO whether for benign or malignant disease. SGE may still be indicated in centers with limited experience with EUS-GE or may be reserved for patients in whom endoscopic technique fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugénie Martinet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Laveran, Marseille, France
| | | | - Maxime Thobois
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Nice, France
| | - Ilyes Hamouda
- Public Health Laboratory of the Faculty of Medical and Paramedical Sciences; Epidemiology and Health Economics Department, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Ghislain Pauleau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Laveran, Marseille, France
| | | | - Philippe Onana
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | - David Jérémie Birnbaum
- APHM Digestive Department, Marseille, France.
- Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille cedex 20, 13915, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fugazza A, Andreozzi M, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Insausti A, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Carrara S, Terrin M, De Marco A, Franchellucci G, Khalaf K, Ketabi Moghadam P, Ferrari C, Anderloni A, Capretti G, Nappo G, Zerbi A, Repici A. Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review on the Old, the Classic and the Innovative Approaches. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:638. [PMID: 38674284 PMCID: PMC11052138 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Gastrojejunostomy is the principal method of palliation for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO). Gastrojejunostomy was traditionally performed as a surgical procedure with an open approach butrecently, notable progress in the development of minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrojejunostomies have emerged. Additionally, advancements in endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic stenting (ES) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), are becoming more prominent. ES involves the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to restore luminal patency. ES is commonly the first choice for patients deemed unfit for surgery or at high surgical risk. However, although ES leads to rapid improvement of symptoms, it carries limitations like higher stent dysfunction rates and the need for frequent re-interventions. Recently, EUS-GE has emerged as a potential alternative, combining the minimally invasive nature of the endoscopic approach with the long-lasting effects of a gastrojejunostomy. Having reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of these different techniques, this article aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding the management of unresectable malignant GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Marta Andreozzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 19875-17411, Iran;
| | - Agustin Insausti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Medical Association Hospital, IGEA Institute, Patricios 347, Bahia Blanca B8000, Argentina;
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Maria Terrin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Gianluca Franchellucci
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada;
| | - Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 19875-17411, Iran;
| | - Chiara Ferrari
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamashige D, Hijioka S, Nagashio Y, Maruki Y, Fukuda S, Yagi S, Okamoto K, Hara H, Hagiwara Y, Agarie D, Takasaki T, Chatto M, Ohba A, Kondo S, Morizane C, Ueno H, Sone M, Saito Y, Okusaka T. Incidence and factors associated with stent dysfunction and pancreatitis after gastroduodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E367-E376. [PMID: 38464977 PMCID: PMC10919994 DOI: 10.1055/a-2261-2833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic gastroduodenal stent (GDS) deployment is currently a standard treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) in patients with limited life expectancy; however, stent dysfunction (SD) and complicated pancreatitis often occur after GDS deployment. We investigated incidence and contributing factors of SD and complicated pancreatitis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 203 patients who underwent initial GDS deployment for palliation of mGOO symptoms between October 2017 and July 2022, including 109 who underwent GDS deployment across the duodenal papilla (sub-cohort). Results SDs, including tumor ingrowth (n = 26), kinking (n = 14), and migration (n = 13), occurred in 68 patients (33.5%). Cumulative SD incidence was 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 32.6-49.4%). SD incidence increased to 0.4%, 0.16%, and 0.06% per day at < 8, 8-16, and>16 weeks, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Niti-S pyloric/duodenal stent deployment (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.26, P = 0.01) and survival length ≥ 90 days (sHR 2.5, P = 0.01) were respectively identified as favorable and risk factors significantly associated with SD. Pancreatitis developed in 14 patients (12.8%) in the sub-cohort, which had significantly higher parenchymal diameter ( P < 0.01) and lower main pancreatic duct (MPD) caliber ( P < 0.01) than the non-pancreatitis cohort. On multivariate analysis, MPD caliber < 3 mm independently predicted pancreatitis (odds ratio 6.8, P = 0.03). Conclusions Deployment of the Niti-S pyloric/duodenal stent, with conformability even for angulated strictures, significantly reduced the incidence of SD. Stent selection, life expectancy, and MPD caliber should be taken into consideration during decision-making for GDS deployment for mGOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiki Yamashige
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Nagashio
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Soma Fukuda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Shin Yagi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Kohei Okamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Hidenobu Hara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Yuya Hagiwara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Daiki Agarie
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Takasaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Mark Chatto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Makati Medical Center, Makati City, Philippines
| | - Akihiro Ohba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kondo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Miyuki Sone
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kastelijn JB, van de Pavert YL, Besselink MG, Fockens P, Voermans RP, van Wanrooij RLJ, de Wijkerslooth TR, Curvers WL, de Hingh IHJT, Bruno MJ, Koerkamp BG, Patijn GA, Poen AC, van Hooft JE, Inderson A, Mieog JSD, Poley JW, Bijlsma A, Lips DJ, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van Dullemen HM, Hoogwater FJH, Frederix GWJ, Molenaar IQ, Welsing PMJ, Moons LMG, van Santvoort HC, Vleggaar FP. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (ENDURO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:608. [PMID: 37749590 PMCID: PMC10518948 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07522-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a debilitating condition that frequently occurs in patients with malignancies of the distal stomach and (peri)ampullary region. The standard palliative treatment for patients with a reasonable life expectancy and adequate performance status is a laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) emerged as a promising alternative to the surgical approach. The present study aims to compare these treatment modalities in terms of efficacy, safety, and costs. METHODS The ENDURO-study is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. In total, ninety-six patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by an irresectable or metastasized malignancy will be 1:1 randomized to either SGJ or EUS-GE. The primary endpoint is time to tolerate at least soft solids. The co-primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with persisting or recurring symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction for which a reintervention is required. Secondary endpoints are technical and clinical success, quality of life, gastroenterostomy dysfunction, reinterventions, time to reintervention, adverse events, quality of life, time to start chemotherapy, length of hospital stay, readmissions, weight, survival, and costs. DISCUSSION The ENDURO-study assesses whether EUS-GE, as compared to SGJ, results in a faster resumption of solid oral intake and is non-inferior regarding reinterventions for persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms in patients with malignant GOO. This trial aims to guide future treatment strategies and to improve quality of life in a palliative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): NL9592. Registered on 07 July 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine B Kastelijn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yorick L van de Pavert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas R de Wijkerslooth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander C Poen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Alderina Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Medas R, Ferreira-Silva J, Girotra M, Barakat M, Tabibian JH, Rodrigues-Pinto E. Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 30:19-34. [PMID: 37818397 PMCID: PMC10561327 DOI: 10.1159/000527202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic stenting is an area of endoscopy that has witnessed noteworthy advancements over the last decade, resulting in evolving clinical practices among gastroenterologists around the world. Indications for endoscopic stenting have progressively expanded, becoming a frequent part of the management algorithm for various benign and malignant conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, from esophagus to rectum. In addition to expanded indications, continuous technological enhancements and development of novel endoscopic stents have resulted in an increased success of these approaches and, in some cases, allowed new applications. This review aimed to summarize best practices in esophageal, gastroduodenal, and colonic stenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Medas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Joel Ferreira-Silva
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mohit Girotra
- Digestive Health Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Monique Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - James H. Tabibian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA
- UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Del Nero L, Sheijani AD, De Ceglie A, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Filiberti RA, Siersema P, Conio M. A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgical Treatment for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. World J Surg 2023; 47:1519-1529. [PMID: 36869171 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06944-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and endoscopic stenting (ES) are the two most available treatments for palliation of malignant gastric obstruction (MGOO). The aim of this study is to compare these two techniques regarding efficacy, safety, time of hospitalization and survival. METHODS We performed a literature search from January 2010 to September 2020 to identify available randomized controlled studies and observational studies that compared ES and GJJ for the treatment of MGOO. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were found. ES and GJJ showed similar technical and clinical success rate. ES was superior to obtain early oral re-feeding, shorter length of hospitalization and a lower incidence of complications than GJJ. Surgical palliation had a lower recurrence rate of obstructive symptoms and longer overall survival than ES. CONCLUSIONS Both procedures have advantages and disadvantages. Probably we should not find the best palliation but the best approach based on the patient characteristics and tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Del Nero
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.
| | - Afscin Djahandideh Sheijani
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Antonella De Ceglie
- Gastroenterology Department, Sanremo General Hospital, ASL1 Imperiese, Sanremo, IM, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Peter Siersema
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.,Gastroenterology Department, Sanremo General Hospital, ASL1 Imperiese, Sanremo, IM, Italy.,Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Massimo Conio
- Gastroenterology Department, Santa Corona Hospital, ASL 2 Savonese, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaruvongvanich V, Mahmoud T, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chandrasekhara V, Law R, Storm AC, Levy MJ, Vargas EJ, Marya NB, Abboud DM, Ghazi R, Matar R, Rapaka B, Buttar N, Truty MJ, Aerts M, Messaoudi N, Kunda R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: A large comparative study with long-term follow-up. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E60-E66. [PMID: 36644538 PMCID: PMC9839427 DOI: 10.1055/a-1976-2279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is traditionally managed with surgical gastroenterostomy (surgical-GE) and enteral stenting (ES). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is now a third option. Large studies assessing their relative risks and benefits with adequate follow-up are lacking. We conducted a comparative analysis of patients who underwent EUS-GE, ES, or surgical-GE for GOO. Patients and methods In this retrospective comparative cohort study, consecutive patients presenting with GOO who underwent EUS-GE, ES, or surgical-GE at two academic institutions were reviewed and independently cross-edited to ensure accurate reporting. The primary outcome was need for reintervention. Secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, length of hospital stay (LOS), and adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 436 patients (232 EUS-GE, 131 ES, 73 surgical-GE) were included. The median duration of follow-up of the entire cohort was 185.5 days (interquartile range 55.25-454.25 days). The rate of reintervention in the EUS-GE group was lower than in the ES and surgical-GE groups (0.9 %, 12.2 %, and 13.7 %, P < 0.0001). Technical success was achieved in 98.3 %, 99.2 %, and 100 % ( P = 0.58), and clinical success was achieved in 98.3 %, 91.6 %, and 90.4 % ( P < 0.0001) in the EUS-GE, ES, and surgical-GE groups, respectively. The EUS-GE group had a shorter LOS (2 days vs. 3 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.0001) and a lower AE rate than the ES and surgical-GE groups (8.6 % vs. 38.9 % vs. 27.4 %, P < 0.0001). Conclusion This large cohort study demonstrates the safety and palliation durability of EUS-GE as an alternative strategy for GOO palliation in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tala Mahmoud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Vinay Chandrasekhara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Andrew C. Storm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Michael J. Levy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Eric J. Vargas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Neil B. Marya
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Donna M. Abboud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Rabih Ghazi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Reem Matar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Babusai Rapaka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Navtej Buttar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Mark J. Truty
- Division of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Maridi Aerts
- Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nouredin Messaoudi
- Department of Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martins RK, Brunaldi VO, Fernandes AL, Otoch JP, Artifon ELDA. Palliative therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: how does the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy compare with surgery and endoscopic stenting? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 16:26317745221149626. [PMID: 36698443 PMCID: PMC9869232 DOI: 10.1177/26317745221149626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The gold-standard procedure to address malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJJ). Two endoscopic alternatives have also been proposed: the endoscopic stenting (ES) and the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-G). This study aimed to perform a thorough and strict meta-analysis to compare EUS-G with the SGJJ and ES in treating patients with MGOO. Materials and Methods Studies comparing EUS-G to endoscopic stenting or SGJJ for patients with MGOO were considered eligible. We conducted online searches in primary databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Central Cochrane) from inception through October 2021. The outcomes were technical and clinical success rates, serious adverse events (SAEs), reintervention due to obstruction, length of hospital stay (LOS), and time to oral intake. Results We found similar technical success rates between ES and EUS-G but clinical success rates favored the latter. The comparison between EUS-G and SGJJ demonstrated better technical success rates in favor of the surgical approach but similar clinical success rates. EUS-G shortens the LOS by 2.8 days compared with ES and 5.8 days compared with SGJJ. Concerning reintervention due to obstruction, we found similar rates for EUS-G and SGJJ but considerably higher rates for ES compared with EUS-G. As to AEs, we demonstrated equivalent rates comparing EUS-G and SGJJ but significantly higher ones compared with ES. Conclusion Despite being novel and still under refinement, the EUS-G has good safety and efficacy profiles compared with SGJJ and ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Krieger Martins
- Postgraduate Program of Anesthesiology, Surgical Sciences and Perioperative Medicine, University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 255 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Surgery and Anatomy Department, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khamar J, Lee Y, Sachdeva A, Anpalagan T, McKechnie T, Eskicioglu C, Agzarian J, Doumouras A, Hong D. Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022:10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5. [PMID: 36138247 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been a standard palliative procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), endoscopic stenting (ES) has shown to provide benefits due to its non-invasive approach. The aim of this review is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of ES versus GJ for the palliation of malignant GOO. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched and comparative studies of adult GOO patients undergoing ES or GJ were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were survival time and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, reinterventions, days until oral food tolerance, postoperative adjuvant palliative chemotherapy, postoperative morbidities, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Pairwise meta-analyses using inverse-variance random effects were performed. RESULTS After identifying 2222 citations, 39 full-text articles fit the inclusion criteria. In total, 3128 ES patients (41.4% female, age: 68.0 years) and 2116 GJ patients (40.4% female, age: 66.8 years) were included. ES patients experienced a shorter survival time (mean difference -24.77 days, 95% Cl - 45.11 to - 4.43, p = 0.02) and were less likely to undergo adjuvant palliative chemotherapy (risk ratio 0.81, 95% Cl 0.70 to 0.93, p = 0.004). The ES group had a shorter LOS, shorter time to oral intake of liquids and solids, and less surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.30, 95% Cl 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01). The patients in the ES group were at greater risk of requiring reintervention (risk ratio 2.60, 95% Cl 1.87 to 3.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION ES results in less postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS when compared to GJ, however, this may be at the cost of decreased initiation of adjuvant palliative chemotherapy and overall survival, as well as increased risk of reintervention. Both techniques are likely appropriate in select clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jigish Khamar
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anjali Sachdeva
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tharani Anpalagan
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Agzarian
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Aristithes Doumouras
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave. East, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harima H, Kaino S, Fujimoto Y, Amano S, Kawano M, Suenaga S, Uekitani T, Sen-Yo M, Kaino M, Takami T, Sakaida I. Comparison of Duodenal Stenting and Gastrojejunostomy for Duodenal Obstruction with Biliary Obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1853-1862. [PMID: 35618992 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05353-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best palliation for double obstruction (duodenal obstruction with biliary obstruction) remains unclear. We aimed to compare outcomes of duodenal stenting (DuS) with gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and identify factors associated with survival time and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO). METHODS Patients who underwent DuS or GJ combined with biliary stenting for double obstruction due to unresectable malignancy were retrospectively enrolled. RESULTS In total, 111 patients were included; 84 underwent DuS, and 27 underwent GJ. The weighted survival time of the DuS group was significantly shorter than that of the GJ group (86 days vs 134 days, P < 0.01). Although the weighted TRBO was not significantly different between the two groups, when limited to patients with distal duodenal obstruction, the weighted TRBO was significantly longer in the DuS group than in the GJ group (207 days vs. 32 days, P < 0.01). GJ for distal duodenal obstruction was identified as the factor with the highest hazard ratio and was associated with a shorter TRBO (hazard ratio 8.5, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Regarding survival time, GJ should be considered the primary treatment for patients with double obstruction. However, for patients with distal duodenal obstruction, DuS should be considered because GJ may be a risk factor for a shorter TRBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirofumi Harima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Shimonoseki General Hospital, 8-5-1 Yasuoka-cho, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, 759-6603, Japan.
| | - Seiji Kaino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Yuko Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Shogo Amano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, Syunan, Yamaguchi, 745-8522, Japan
| | - Michitaka Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Suenaga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Uekitani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, Syunan, Yamaguchi, 745-8522, Japan
| | - Manabu Sen-Yo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-0042, Japan
| | - Miyuki Kaino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyo-Onoda, Yamaguchi, 756-0095, Japan
| | - Taro Takami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Isao Sakaida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maetani I. How to successfully administer palliative treatment with a stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction? Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:967740. [PMID: 36017000 PMCID: PMC9395687 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.967740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic stenting (ES) has been widely used as a less-invasive palliation method for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), recent reports have highlighted issues related to the procedure. For successful treatment, various aspects must be assessed before considering the practices. First, it is necessary to eliminate cases with contraindications such as coexistence of distal small-bowel obstruction or perforation. Other factors potentially related to clinical failure (i.e., peritoneal carcinomatosis) may require consideration but remain controversial. ES has better short-term outcomes than surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ). GJ has recently been considered preferable in cases with longer life expectancy because of superior sustainability. Various types of stents are now commercially available, but their ideal structure and mechanical properties have not yet been clarified. Covered metal stent may reduce stent obstruction but is prone to increase stent migration, and its significance remains uncertain. Subsequent chemotherapy after stenting should be considered, as it is expected to prolong patient survival without increasing the risk of adverse events. Furthermore, it may be helpful in preventing tumor ingrowth. In cases with GOO combined with biliary obstruction, biliary intervention is often difficult. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been widely used as an alternative procedure for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (ETBD). Despite the lack of consensus as to whether ETBD or EUS-BD is preferred, EUS-BD is useful as a salvage technique for cases where ETBD is difficult. To perform stent placement successfully, it is important to pay attention to the above points; however, many remaining issues need to be clarified in the future.
Collapse
|
13
|
Krishnamoorthi R, Bomman S, Benias P, Kozarek RA, Peetermans JA, McMullen E, Gjata O, Irani SS. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic duodenal stent versus endoscopic or surgical gastrojejunostomy to treat malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E874-E897. [PMID: 35692924 PMCID: PMC9187371 DOI: 10.1055/a-1794-0635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Malignant disease accounts for up to 80 % of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) cases, which may be treated with duodenal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), and more recently endoscopic-ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). These three treatments have not been compared head-to-head in a randomized trial. Methods We searched the Embase and MEDLINE databases for studies published January 2015-February 2021 assessing treatment of malignant GOO using duodenal SEMS, endoscopic (EUS-GE) or surgical (laparoscopic or open) GJ. Efficacy outcomes assessed included technical and clinical success rates, GOO recurrence and reintervention. Safety outcomes included procedure-related bleeding or perforation, and stent-related events for the duodenal SEMS and EUS-GE arms. Results EUS-GE had a lower rate of technical success (95.3%) than duodenal SEMS (99.4 %) or surgical GJ (99.9%) ( P = 0.0048). For duodenal SEMS vs. EUS-GE vs. surgical GJ, rates of clinical success (88.9 % vs. 89.0 % vs. 92.3 % respectively, P = 0.49) were similar. EUS-GE had a lower rate of GOO recurrence based on limited data ( P = 0.0036), while duodenal SEMS had a higher rate of reintervention ( P = 0.041). Overall procedural complications were similar (duodenal SEMS 18.7 % vs. EUS-GE 21.9 % vs. surgical GJ 23.8 %, P = 0.32), but estimated bleeding rate was lowest ( P = 0.0048) and stent occlusion rate was highest ( P = 0.0002) for duodenal SEMS. Conclusions Duodenal SEMS, EUS-GE, and surgical GJ showed similar clinical efficacy for the treatment of malignant GOO. Duodenal SEMS had a lower procedure-related bleeding rate but higher rate of reintervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Shivanand Bomman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Petros Benias
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, United States
| | - Richard A. Kozarek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Joyce A. Peetermans
- Endoscopy Division, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Edmund McMullen
- Endoscopy Division, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ornela Gjata
- Endoscopy Division, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Shayan S. Irani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hong J, Chen Y, Li J, Hu P, Chen P, Du N, Huang T, Chen J. Comparison of gastrojejunostomy to endoscopic stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: An updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2022; 223:1067-1078. [PMID: 34728070 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the optimal intervention modality for malignant GOO by comparing clinical outcomes after Gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic stenting. METHODS Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles before February 2021 to compare the clinical outcomes of GOO patients undergoing GJ or ES. RESULTS This meta-analysis included 31 articles with 2444 GOO patients. Although the GJ group outperformed the ES group in technical success (OR,3.79; P = 0.003), clinical success was not significantly different between the two groups (OR,1.25; P = 0.50). The GJ group had a longer hospitalization, lower re-obstruction and lower reintervention. Moreover, GJ had a better survival than ES in the gastric cancer group (HR, 0.33; P = 0.009). However, no significant statistical difference was observed in the pancreatic cancer group (HR, 0.55; P = 0.159). CONCLUSIONS Both GJ and ES are safe and effective intervention modalities for malignant GOO. GJ had significantly improved survival in gastric cancer patients with GOO, while no significant difference was observed between the two groups in pancreatic cancer patients with GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaze Hong
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yizhou Chen
- Emergency Medical Center, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Jiayu Li
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Peidong Hu
- Schools of Medicine & Nursing Sciences, Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Nannan Du
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Tongmin Huang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Jingjie Chen
- Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hirata Y, Katz MHG, Ikoma N. Robotic Duodenojejunostomy Bypass for Metastatic Pancreatic Body Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1115-1116. [PMID: 35132565 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05263-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT17.6010, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT17.6010, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT17.6010, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Papanikolaou IS, Siersema PD. Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2022; 16:667-675. [PMID: 35314520 PMCID: PMC9474481 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common condition in which mechanical obstruction of the pylorus, distal stomach, or duodenum causes severe symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Its etiology includes both benign and malignant disorders. Currently, GOO has many treatment options, including initial conservative therapeutic protocols and more invasive procedures, such as surgical gastroenterostomy, stent placement and, the most recently implemented procedure, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). Each procedure has its merits, with surgery often prevailing in patients with longer life expectancy and stents being used most often in patients with malignant gastric outlet stenosis. The newly developed EUS-GE combines the immediate effect of stents and the long-term efficacy of gastroenterostomy. However, this novel method is a technically demanding process that requires expert experience and special facilities. Thus, the true clinical effectiveness, as well as the duration of the effects of EUS-GE, still need to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ahmed O, Lee JH, Thompson CC, Faulx A. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Optimal Management of the Malignant Alimentary Tract Obstruction: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1780-1788. [PMID: 33813072 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The purpose of this expert review is to describe the current methodologies available to manage malignant alimentary tract obstructions as well the evidence behind the various methods (including their efficacy and safety), indications, and appropriate timing of interventions. METHODS This is not a formal systematic review but is based on a review of the literature to provide best practice advice statements. No formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendation is carried out. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: For all patients with alimentary tract obstruction, the decision about specific interventions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting including oncologists, surgeons, and endoscopists and take into account the characteristics of the obstruction, patient's expectations, prognosis, expected subsequent therapies, and functional status. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: For patients who present with esophageal obstruction from esophageal cancer and who are potential candidates for resection or chemoradiation, clinicians should not routinely insert a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) without multidisciplinary review because of high rates of stent migration, higher morbidity and mortality, and potentially lower R0 (microscopically negative margins) resection rates. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: For patients who present with esophageal obstruction from esophageal cancer who are potential candidates for resection and who have concerns of malnutrition, clinicians may consider the use of enteral feeding tubes (via nasogastric or percutaneous route). Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of abdominal wall tumor seeding as well as making subsequent gastric conduit formation difficult with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: For patients who present with esophageal obstruction from esophageal cancer who are not candidates for resection, clinicians should consider either SEMS insertion or brachytherapy as sole therapy or in combination. Clinicians should not consider the use of laser therapy or photodynamic therapy because of the lack of evidence of better outcomes and superior alternatives. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: For patients with malignant esophageal obstruction who are undergoing SEMS placement, clinicians should use a fully covered or partially covered SEMS and not an uncovered SEMS, with consideration of a stent-anchoring/fixation method. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: For patients with gastric outlet obstruction who have a life expectancy greater than 2 months, have good functional status, and who are surgically fit, surgical gastrojejunostomy should be considered. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: For patients with gastric outlet obstruction who are undergoing surgical gastrojejunostomy, a laparoscopic approach is favored over an open approach because of lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: For patients with gastric outlet obstruction who are not candidates for gastrojejunostomy (surgical or endoscopic ultrasound-guided), clinicians should consider the insertion of an enteral stent. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Enteral stents should not be used in patients with multiple luminal obstructions or severely impaired gastric motility because of the limited benefit in these scenarios. Clinicians can consider placement of a venting gastrostomy in these patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Depending on the experience of the endoscopist, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy is an acceptable alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy and enteral stent placement. Clinicians should be aware that there are currently no dedicated Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: For patients with malignant colonic obstruction who are candidates for resection, insertion of SEMS is a reasonable choice as a "bridge to surgery" to allow for one-stage, elective resection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: For patients with malignant colonic obstruction who are not candidates for resection, either SEMS placement or a diverting colostomy are reasonable choices depending on the patient's goals and functional status. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: SEMS is a reasonable option for patients with proximal (or right-sided) malignant obstructions, both as a "bridge to surgery" and in the palliative setting. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: SEMS placement is a reasonable alternative for patients with extracolonic malignancy who are not candidates for surgery, although their placement is more technically challenging, clinical success rates are more variable, and complications (including stent migration) are more frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Christopher C Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ashley Faulx
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, and University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bleicher J, Lambert LA. A Palliative Approach to Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Malignant Ascites. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:475-490. [PMID: 34053663 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In addition to severe, life-limiting complications such as malignant bowel obstruction, fistulae, and malignant ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis frequently causes life-impacting symptoms such as pain, nausea, anorexia, cachexia, and fatigue. A variety of medical, interventional, and surgical therapies are now available for management of both complications and symptoms. Although surgery in this population is often associated with a relatively high risk of morbidity and mortality, operative intervention can offer effective palliative treatment in appropriately selected patients. Early involvement of palliative care specialists as part of a multidisciplinary team is essential to providing optimal, holistic care of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Bleicher
- Division of General Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Suite 6405, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Laura A Lambert
- Division of General Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Suite 6405, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boghossian MB, Funari MP, De Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Sagae VMT, Chen YI, Mendieta PJO, Neto FLP, Bernardo WM, Dos Santos MEL, Chaves FT, Khashab MA, de Moura EGH. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stent placement and surgical gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:1803-1817. [PMID: 34121130 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02215-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life, thereby necessitating effective and safe palliative treatment. As such, we sought to compare endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) versus duodenal stent (DS) placement and surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) for palliation of malignant GOO. METHODS Searches of electronic databases were performed to identify studies comparing EUS-GE versus DS and/or SGJ for palliative treatment of GOO. Outcomes included technical and clinical success, severe adverse events (SAEs), rate of stent obstruction (including tumor ingrowth), length of hospital stay (LOS), reintervention, and 30-day all-cause mortality. Differences in dichotomous and continuous outcomes were reported as risk difference and mean difference, respectively. RESULTS Seven studies (n = 513 patients) were included. When compared to DS placement, EUS-GE was associated with a higher clinical success, fewer SAEs, decreased stent obstruction, lower rate of tumor ingrowth, and decreased need for reintervention. Compared to SGJ, EUS-GE was associated with a lower technical success; however, LOS was significantly decreased. All other outcomes including clinical success, SAEs, reintervention rate, and 30-day mortality were not significantly different between an EUS-guided versus surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GE was associated with significantly improved outcomes compared to DS placement for palliative treatment of malignant GOO. Despite SGJ possessing a higher technical success compared to EUS-GE, LOS was significantly longer with no difference in clinical success or rate of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateus Bond Boghossian
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
| | - Mateus Pereira Funari
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vitor Massaro Takamatsu Sagae
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pastor Joaquín Ortiz Mendieta
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Fernando Lopes Ponte Neto
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Filipe Tomishige Chaves
- Rua Isabel Schmidt, Universidade Santo Amaro, 349 - Santo Amaro, São Paulo, SP, 04743-030, Brazil
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255. 6° andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Klose J, Rieder S, Ronellenfitsch U. Surgical and interventional treatment options in unresectable gastrointestinal cancer. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2021.100037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
21
|
Cheung SLH, Teoh AYB. Optimal Management of Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Unresectable Malignancies. Gut Liver 2021; 16:190-197. [PMID: 34039779 PMCID: PMC8924806 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the different treatment options for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) and compare their safety and efficacy. We describe the history and evolution of gastrojejunostomy (GJ), endoscopic stenting and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) and analyze the current evidence regarding these three methods available in the literature, comparing their applicability, safety, complications and cost when used for the treatment of malignant GOO. We conclude that given the benefits of endoscopic techniques and the ability to place a stent away from the tumor, EUS-GE is a promising technique that may yield an efficacy similar to that of surgical GJ and duodenal stenting, with lower reintervention rates and fewer adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Lok Hang Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol 2021. [PMID: 32390697 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients' survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Annalisa Cappello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jue TL, Storm AC, Naveed M, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, McRee AJ, Truty MJ, Khashab MA, Agrawal D, Al-Haddad M, Amateau SK, Buxbaum JL, Calderwood AH, DeWitt J, DiMaio CJ, Fujii-Lau LL, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Kwon RS, Law JK, Lee JK, Pawa S, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of benign and malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:309-322.e4. [PMID: 33168194 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to address key clinical questions. These include the comparison of (1) surgical gastrojejunostomy to the placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant GOO, (2) covered versus uncovered SEMS for malignant GOO, and (3) endoscopic and surgical interventions for the management of benign GOO. Recommendations provided in this document were founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, considerations of patient and caregiver preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry L Jue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mariam Naveed
- Advent Health Medical Group, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Advent Health Hospital Altamonte Springs, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Autumn J McRee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Mohammed Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart K Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - John DeWitt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Larissa L Fujii-Lau
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Suryakanth R Gurudu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joanna K Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julie Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Sachin B Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis: a review of established techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:34-46. [PMID: 32593687 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Technologic advancements in the field of therapeutic endoscopy have led to the development of minimally invasive techniques to create GI anastomosis without requiring surgery. Examples of the potential clinical applications include bypassing malignant and benign gastric outlet obstruction, providing access to the pancreatobiliary tree in those who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and relieving pancreatobiliary symptoms in afferent loop syndrome. Endoscopic GI anastomosis is less invasive and less expensive than surgical approaches, result in improved outcomes, and therefore are more appealing to patients and providers. The aim of this review is to present the evolution of luminal endoscopic gastroenteric and enteroenteric anastomosis dating back to the first compression devices and to describe the clinical techniques being used today, such as magnets, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, and EUS-guided techniques. Through continued innovation, endoscopic interventions will rise to the forefront of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients requiring GI anastomosis.
Collapse
|
25
|
Keane MG, Khashab MA. Malignant GOO: Are duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy obsolete? Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1455-E1457. [PMID: 33043113 PMCID: PMC7541185 DOI: 10.1055/a-1231-5011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret G. Keane
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kastelijn JB, Moons LM, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Pérez-Miranda M, Masaryk V, Will U, Tarantino I, van Dullemen HM, Bijlsma R, Poley JW, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP. Patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1194-E1201. [PMID: 32904815 PMCID: PMC7458745 DOI: 10.1055/a-1214-5659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel, minimally invasive technique in the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Several studies have demonstrated feasibility and safety of EUS-GE, but evidence on long-term durability is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate patency of EUS-GE in treatment of malignant GOO. Patients and Methods An international multicenter study was performed in seven centers in four European countries. Patients who underwent EUS-GE with a LAMS between March 2015 and March 2019 for palliative treatment of symptomatic malignant GOO were included retrospectively. Our main outcome was recurrent obstruction due to LAMS dysfunction; other outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and survival. Results A total of 45 patients (mean age 69.9 ± 12.3 years and 48.9 % male) were included. Median duration of follow-up was 59 days (interquartile range [IQR] 41-128). Recurrent obstruction occurred in two patients (6.1 %), after 33 and 283 days of follow-up. Technical success was achieved in 39 patients (86.7 %). Clinical success was achieved in 33 patients (73.3 %). AEs occurred in 12 patients (26.7 %), of which five were fatal. Median overall survival was 57 days (IQR 32-114). Conclusions EUS-GE showed a low rate of recurrent obstruction. The relatively high number of fatal AEs underscores the importance of careful implementation of EUS-GE in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine B. Kastelijn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manuel Pérez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Viliam Masaryk
- Department of Gastroenterology and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum, Gera, Germany
| | - Uwe Will
- Department of Gastroenterology and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum, Gera, Germany
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IsMeTT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Hendrik M. van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rina Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P. Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Blanco GDV, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:1847-1860. [PMID: 32390697 PMCID: PMC7201143 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients’ survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Annalisa Cappello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Napoli 80129, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| |
Collapse
|