Dosing of glucocorticosteroids in nephrotic syndrome

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Optimizing the corticosteroid dose in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic (SSNS) syndrome in children has evolved surprisingly slowly since the ISKDC consensus over 50 years ago. From a move towards longer courses of corticosteroid to treat the first episode in the 1990s and 2000s, more recent large, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have unequivocally shown no benefit from an extended course, although doubt remains whether this applies across all age groups. With regard to prevention of relapses, daily ultra-low-dose prednisolone has recently been shown to be more effective than low-dose alternate-day prednisolone. Daily low-dose prednisolone for a week at the time of acute viral infection seems to be effective in the prevention of relapses but the results of a larger RCT are awaited. Recently, corticosteroid dosing to treat relapses has been questioned, with data suggesting lower doses may be as effective. The need for large RCTs to address the question of whether corticosteroid doses can be reduced was the conclusion of the authors of the recent corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children Cochrane update. This review summarizes development in thinking on corticosteroid use in SSNS and makes suggestions for areas that merit further scrutiny.

Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome with two steroid dosing regimens - one-year observational study

Introduction

The aim of the study was to compare the first year of disease in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) treated according to two prednisone dosing regimens: a weight-based schedule (2 mg/kg/24 h in the 1^st month, 2 mg/kg/48 h in the 2^nd month, with dose tapering during the following 4 months), and a body surface area (BSA)-based schedule (60 mg/m²/24 h in the 1^st month, 40 mg/m²/48 h in the 2^nd month, with dose tapering during the following 4 months).

Material and methods

In 2 groups of children treated with weight- and BSA-based regimens (20 patients, 3.13 ±1.01 years, treated in 2010-2013 and 20 patients, 5.13 ±2.86 years, treated in 2014-2016) clinical and anthropometrical parameters, number of INS relapses, total prednisone dose (mg/kg/year), and steroid adverse effects were compared during the first year of disease.

Results

Children treated with the weight-based steroid regimen received a higher total annual prednisone dose (259.06 ±79.54 vs. 185.83 ±72.67 mg/kg/24 h, p = 0.004) and had a shorter (though not significantly) period without prednisone (38.25 ±55.83 vs. 75.90 ±73.06 days, p = 0.062) compared to patients treated with the BSA-based regimen. There was no difference in number of relapses between groups (2.20 ±1.64 vs. 1.60 ±1.67, p = 0.190) but more patients relapsed in the weight-based group (19/20 vs. 13/20, p = 0.044). No differences in Z-score values of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were observed. No steroid-related adverse events were noted except for arterial hypertension (4/20 vs. 5/20 patients, p = 1.000).

Conclusions

The BSA-based regimen of prednisone dosing in children with INS reduces exposure to steroids and risk of relapse, as well as increases days off steroids in the first year compared to the weight-based regimen with a high second-month dose.

Low-dose versus conventional-dose prednisolone for nephrotic syndrome relapses: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Reduction of steroid exposure in relapses of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is under-researched.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 1-12-year-old children with relapse of SSNS were randomized to receive prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (low dose) or 2 mg/kg/day (standard dose) until disease remission or day 15, whichever was earlier. Therapy was switched to 2 mg/kg/day in children in low-dose group not in remission by day 15. Primary outcome was days to remission, and secondary outcome being pattern of subsequent relapse(s) over 1 year. Estimating time to remission of 8 ± 2.5 days with standard-dose therapy, non-inferiority margin of 2 days, 90% power, and α-0.05, 60 patients were randomized.

RESULTS

Of the 60 children (30 in each group) enrolled, 4 (one in low-dose group) failed remission by day 15. Time to remission was comparable between low-dose and standard-dose groups [9.0 ± 2.2 vs. 8.6 ± 2.2 days; mean difference (95% CI) 0.4 (- 0.79 to 1.59) days; p = 0.49], thus establishing non-inferiority of low dose. Median time to subsequent relapse was 86 (IQR 74.8, 97.2) and 150 (IQR 59.0, 240.9) days, in low- versus standard-dose groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.39). In follow-up, proportion of children having relapses, frequency of relapses, proportion with frequent relapse/steroid dependent (FR/SD), and cumulative corticosteroid dose taken were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that time to achieve remission after treatment of a relapse with low-dose prednisolone is non-inferior to that after treatment with conventional dose in children with SSNS. The proportion of children achieving remission, further course, and pattern of relapses was comparable between both groups.

Efficacy of body weight vs body surface area-based prednisolone regimen in nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prednisolone dosing regimen based on body surface area (BSA) or body weight (BW) in managing uncomplicated nephrotic syndrome (NS) has been a matter of controversy.

METHODS

In this parallel-arm randomized clinical trial, 60 children with uncomplicated NS in relapse were randomized to receive either of two regimens. Children of BW cohort received prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) till remission (or 6 weeks for first episode); followed by 1.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 4 weeks (or 6 weeks for first episode). Children randomized for BSA cohort received prednisolone (60 mg/m²/day) till remission (or 6 week for first episode); followed by 40 mg/m² on alternate days for 4 weeks (or 6 weeks for first episode). The primary endpoint was 6-month relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (clinical trial registry of India CTRI/2015/03/005655).

RESULTS

The 6-month relapse-free survival rates were similar for both BSA cohort 73.33% (22/30) and BW cohort 70% (21/30) (p = 1, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52). Requirement of cumulative steroid to achieve initial remission (96.1 ± 57.8 vs 63.58 ± 40.2 mg/kg, p = 0.014) and over 6-month study period (104.34 ± 50.82 vs 73.88 ± 42.95 mg/kg, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in BSA cohort in comparison to BW cohort. However, time taken in achieving remission during enrolment episode in both BSA and BW groups was comparable (7 ± 1.7 vs 6.9 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.81). While both treatments were well tolerated, the number of adverse events was one and half times as common in the BSA group than BW group (37 vs. 22 events).

CONCLUSIONS

In treating children with uncomplicated NS, both BSA and BW regimens were equally effective in achieving initial remission and maintaining disease remission. Due to fewer adverse events and lesser cumulative steroid exposure with BW based regimen, it may be considered as better option over BSA regimen.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2015/03/005655).

Lower prednisone dosing for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse: a prospective randomized pilot study

Relapses of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are traditionally treated with prednisone 2 mg/kg/day or 60 mg/m²/day. Retrospective data support the use of lower doses. We designed a prospective randomized pilot study to investigate the efficacy of different doses in achieving remission of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse. The cohort included 30 children with relapsed steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome, mean age 6.3 ± 3 years and mean disease duration 2.2 ± 1.8 years. The children were randomized to receive 2, 1.5, or 1 mg/kg/day prednisone. The corresponding times to response, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days without proteinuria, were 7.2 ± 1.4, 10.2 ± 5.1, and 9 ± 3.3 days; the difference between the 1.5 and 2 mg/kg/day groups was statistically significant. One patient each in the 1 mg/kg/day and the 1.5 mg/kg/day groups failed to respond and were switched to 2 mg/kg/day, leading to a response after 3 and 10 days, respectively. Mean cumulative prednisone doses in the 3 groups were 45.5 ± 3.4, 42.7 ± 25.9, and 24.9 ± 7.4 mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.05).Conclusion: In the present study, treatment of childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse with prednisone 1-1.5 mg/kg/day led to a significantly lower cumulative dose than the standard dose. Treatment with a lower dose may be equally safe and effective to the standard dose.What is Known:• Relapses of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are traditionally treated with standard-dose steroids.• Treatment with corticosteroids may have significant adverse effects mainly with long-term use.What is New:• Treatment of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse with 1-1.5 mg/kg/day prednisone may lead to a significantly lower cumulative dose.• Treatment with a lower steroid dose may be as effective as the standard dose in achieving remission of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse.

The Italian Society for Pediatric Nephrology (SINePe) consensus document on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children: Part I - Diagnosis and treatment of the first episode and the first relapse

This consensus document is aimed at providing an updated, multidisciplinary overview on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric nephrotic syndrome (NS) at first presentation. It is the first consensus document of its kind to be produced by all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy, in line with what is already present in other countries such as France, Germany and the USA. It is based on the current knowledge surrounding the symptomatic and steroid treatment of NS, with a view to providing the basis for a separate consensus document on the treatment of relapses. NS is one of the most common pediatric glomerular diseases, with an incidence of around 2-7 cases per 100000 children per year. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, but the optimal therapeutic regimen for managing childhood idiopathic NS is still under debate. In Italy, shared treatment guidelines were lacking and, consequently, the choice of steroid regimen was based on the clinical expertise of each individual unit. On the basis of the 2015 Cochrane systematic review, KDIGO Guidelines and more recent data from the literature, this working group, with the contribution of all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy and on the behalf of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology, has produced a shared steroid protocol that will be useful for National Health System hospitals and pediatricians. Investigations at initial presentation and the principal causes of NS to be screened are suggested. In the early phase of the disease, symptomatic treatment is also important as many severe complications can occur which are either directly related to the pathophysiology of the underlying NS or to the steroid treatment itself. To date, very few studies have been published on the prophylaxis and treatment of these early complications, while recommendations are either lacking or conflicting. This consensus provides indications for the prevention, early recognition and treatment of these complications (management of edema and hypovolemia, therapy and prophylaxis of infections and thromboembolic events). Finally, recommendations about the clinical definition of steroid resistance and its initial diagnostic management, as well as indications for renal biopsy are provided.

Body weight-based prednisolone versus body surface area-based prednisolone regimen for induction of remission in children with nephrotic syndrome: a randomized, open-label, equivalence clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Body surface area (BSA)-based prednisolone dosing for childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS) leads to higher cumulative prednisolone doses than body weight (BW)-based dosing. The clinical effects of this higher dosage have not been evaluated in prospective studies.

METHODS

This parallel-group open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled 100 children with idiopathic NS, to receive BW-based (n = 50) or BSA-based (n = 50) prednisolone dosing by block randomization in a 1:1 ratio. The time taken for remission, relapse rate per 6 months, and adverse effects of steroids were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the time taken for remission in the BW group versus the BSA group (median (IQR) 7 (4.5-9) versus 5.5 (4-8) days; p = 0.082); similar results were observed on subgroup analysis in new-onset and infrequently-relapsing NS (IFRNS). The cumulative prednisolone dosage during the enrolment episode was higher in the BSA group. The incidence of hypertension was higher (p = 0.048) in the BSA group on per-protocol analysis. The relapse rates in the two groups per 6 months on follow-up were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes with BW-based dosing are equivalent to BSA dosing-related outcomes, although cumulative prednisolone doses are lower in the former. The practice of BW-based calculations for prescribing prednisolone in NS is a reasonable approach.

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

In nephrotic syndrome protein leaks from the blood to the urine through the glomeruli resulting in hypoproteinaemia and generalised oedema. While most children with nephrotic syndrome respond to corticosteroids, 80% experience a relapsing course. Corticosteroids have reduced the mortality rate to around 3%. However corticosteroids have well recognised potentially serious adverse effects such as obesity, poor growth, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and behavioural disturbances. This is an update of a review first published in 2000 and updated in 2003, 2005 and 2007.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of different corticosteroid regimens in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). The benefits and harms of therapy were studied in two groups of children 1) children in their initial episode of SSNS, and 2) children who experience a relapsing course of SSNS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 26 February 2015 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children (three months to 18 years) in their initial or subsequent episode of SSNS, comparing different durations, total doses or other dose strategies using any corticosteroid agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Ten new studies were identified so a total of 34 studies (3033 total participants) were included in the 2015 review update. The risk of bias attributes were frequently poorly performed. Low risk of bias was reported in 18 studies for sequence generation, 16 studies for allocation concealment, seven for performance and detection bias, 15 for incomplete reporting and 16 for selective reporting. Three months or more of prednisone significantly reduced the risk of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) (6 studies, 582 children: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.00) and of relapse by 12 to 24 months (8 studies, 741 children: RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.00) compared with two months. Five or six months of prednisone significantly reduced the risk of relapse (7 studies, 763 children: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85) but not FRNS (5 studies, 591 children: RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.22) compared with three months. However there was significant heterogeneity in the analyses. Subgroup analysis stratified by risk of bias for allocation concealment showed that the risk for FRNS did not differ significantly between two or three months of prednisone and three to six months among studies at low risk of bias but was significantly reduced in extended duration studies compared with two or three months in studies at high risk or unclear risk of bias. There were no significant differences in the risk of adverse effects between extended duration and two or three months of prednisone. Four studies found that in children with FRNS, daily prednisone during viral infections compared with alternate-day prednisone or no treatment significantly reduced the rate of relapse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this 2015 update the addition of three well-designed studies has changed the conclusion of this review. Studies of long versus shorter duration of corticosteroids have heterogeneous treatment effects, with the older high risk of bias studies tending to over-estimate the effect of longer course therapy, compared with more recently published low risk of bias studies. Among studies at low risk of bias, there was no significant difference in the risk for FRNS between prednisone given for two or three months and longer durations or total dose of therapy indicating that there is no benefit of increasing the duration of prednisone beyond two or three months in the initial episode of SSNS.The risk of relapse in children with FRNS is reduced by the administration of daily prednisone at onset of an upper respiratory tract or viral infection. Three additional studies have increased the evidence supporting this conclusion. This management strategy may be considered for children with FRNS. A paucity of data on prednisone use in relapsing nephrotic syndrome remains. In particular there are no data from RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of prolonged courses of low dose alternate-day prednisone although this management strategy is recommended in current guidelines.