[Complications of the 180 Watt XPS™ GreenLight laser-results of 1283 procedures]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to classify and analyze postoperative complications under a new inspection method. This study assessed all patients who presented to the urologic ward within the first 3 months after their surgery.

METHODS

A total of 170 patients suffered from complications due to the surgery; 29 patients experienced complications that were not directly correlated with the surgery. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the emitted laser energy of the 180 Watt XPS™ GreenLight laser measured in joules, and the complications which led to the renewed hospitalization such as hematuria, urinary retention, and infection were analyzed and compared in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

Most complications that occurred were urinary retention and hematuria (50.6% and 49.4% of all patients, respectively). Of the patients with hematuria, 86.75% were under anticoagulant therapy medication.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the reference approval study (Goliath trial) that included 135 multicentric patients (14.07% of patients presented with a complication classified as Clavien-Dindo II), the rate of complications was similar. This outcome is surprising because the patients treated with the GreenLight laser in the present study were classified as geriatric patients not only according to their age but also in their ASA score which is an indication of multiple other pathologies and administered medications. To achieve long-term postoperative success for these patients, the interface between the ambulatory and the hospital care should be optimized.

Efficacy and safety of argatroban in treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Argatroban is a novel direct thrombin inhibitor that has been used for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To our knowledge, no systematic analysis has assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban for treatment of AIS.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of argatroban for treatment of AIS.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched to retrieve all studies associated with argatroban and AIS. Effective rate, adverse events rate, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled using meta-analysis methodology.

RESULTS

We only found four randomized controlled studies, comprising 354 cases with 213 in the argatroban group and 141 in the control group. Great heterogeneity was found in the four studies (c² = 11.44, I² = 74%, P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis could not be performed because of the absence of detailed data. The two most recent studies showed acceptable heterogeneity (c² = 1.56, I² = 36%, P = 0.21). Our analysis showed that argatroban was not more effective than the control therapy in the acute phase of ischemic stroke (Z = 0.01, P = 0.99). Argatroban did not increase the risk of bleeding compared with the control group (c² = 0.37, I² = 0%, P = 0.54, Z = 0.80, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AIS might not benefit from argatroban and combination therapy with argatroban does not increase bleeding tendency.

Mitral valve thrombosis in term pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

With this case report would like to emphasize the complexity that involves the management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. In that sense, an adequate interdisciplinary management of this potentially serious pathology is required for maternal and fetal well-being.

CASE REPORT

A 32-year-old primipara, with a mechanical mitral valve replacement, was admitted to our emergency department at 37⁺¹ weeks of gestation with acute dyspnea and presyncope. The patient was diagnosed with mechanical mitral valve thrombosis and, due to the appearance of hemodynamic instability, the patient underwent an uncomplicated emergency caesarean section and subsequent prosthetic mitral valve replacement. The patient was discharged six days after surgery, without any obstetric complication and with normal valve function.

CONCLUSION

This case report shows that, despite strict control and optimal anticoagulation regimen, pregnant women with mechanical heart valves still have a high risk of developing valve thrombosis.

Anticoagulant plus antiplatelet therapy for atrial fibrillation : Cost-utility of combination therapy with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence indicates combination therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for atrial fibrillation (AF) will be increasingly required. Numerous studies compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation alone in AF, i. e., non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin. However, the addition of antiplatelet agents with their potential for decreasing thromboembolic stroke counter-balanced by an increased bleeding risk has received less attention. Thus, we evaluated the cost-utility of this combination therapy.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We obtained event estimates from our recent meta-analysis of four randomized clinical trials designed to compare NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF. We examined patient subgroups within each trial that received antiplatelet therapy in addition to anticoagulation. Utilities were derived from the literature and cost estimates from the German health-care system. A decision tree was constructed and populated with these parameters. We used a 1-year time horizon because combination therapy is not recommended beyond this time. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The derived ICER was 13,168.50 € per QALY. NOAC prices exerted considerable influence on the calculation. Nevertheless, there is potential for ICER shifts in favor of warfarin, e.g., if warfarin-mediated anticoagulation control is improved and thereby adverse events decrease. Conversely, if NOAC adherence decreases, adverse events could increase.

CONCLUSION

The derived ICER was 13,168.50 € per QALY, consistent with NOACs being cost-effective vs. warfarin when anticoagulation is used with antiplatelet agents. Nevertheless, country-, practice-, and patient-related factors influence the ICER. Our cost-utility calculation should be used a starting point for decision-making.

Surgical techniques for left atrial appendage exclusion

The increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation with the aging population and its associated major morbidity and mortality due to thromboembolic stroke have resulted in intensive research on stroke prevention or stroke risk reduction strategies. Several surgical techniques for left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion have evolved over the past decades. Surgeons have been using different techniques leading to highly variable and, in particular, poor data on outcomes. LAA closure is performed either as a concomitant procedure during open-heart surgery or as a stand-alone surgical procedure as part of minimally invasive (mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopy) arrhythmia surgery. Data on the safety and feasibility of surgical LAA occlusion are derived mainly from nonrandomized case series, observational and cohort studies, or registries with mostly inconclusive and conflicting results. Increased awareness of the high failure rates in attaining complete LAA occlusion, thus avoiding poor surgical techniques (e. g., simple suture ligation, endocardial suturing etc.), and the availability of newer devices (e. g., AtriClip device) have recently led to improved surgical results in the literature. If further validated in large-scale studies, these recent promising developments in the field of surgical LAA treatment seem to offer alternatives for patients ineligible for oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists or newer non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants.

The Italian Society for Pediatric Nephrology (SINePe) consensus document on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children: Part I - Diagnosis and treatment of the first episode and the first relapse

This consensus document is aimed at providing an updated, multidisciplinary overview on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric nephrotic syndrome (NS) at first presentation. It is the first consensus document of its kind to be produced by all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy, in line with what is already present in other countries such as France, Germany and the USA. It is based on the current knowledge surrounding the symptomatic and steroid treatment of NS, with a view to providing the basis for a separate consensus document on the treatment of relapses. NS is one of the most common pediatric glomerular diseases, with an incidence of around 2-7 cases per 100000 children per year. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, but the optimal therapeutic regimen for managing childhood idiopathic NS is still under debate. In Italy, shared treatment guidelines were lacking and, consequently, the choice of steroid regimen was based on the clinical expertise of each individual unit. On the basis of the 2015 Cochrane systematic review, KDIGO Guidelines and more recent data from the literature, this working group, with the contribution of all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy and on the behalf of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology, has produced a shared steroid protocol that will be useful for National Health System hospitals and pediatricians. Investigations at initial presentation and the principal causes of NS to be screened are suggested. In the early phase of the disease, symptomatic treatment is also important as many severe complications can occur which are either directly related to the pathophysiology of the underlying NS or to the steroid treatment itself. To date, very few studies have been published on the prophylaxis and treatment of these early complications, while recommendations are either lacking or conflicting. This consensus provides indications for the prevention, early recognition and treatment of these complications (management of edema and hypovolemia, therapy and prophylaxis of infections and thromboembolic events). Finally, recommendations about the clinical definition of steroid resistance and its initial diagnostic management, as well as indications for renal biopsy are provided.

Safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The safety of anticoagulation and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear. We investigated the risks and benefits of this approach in AF patients with a history of ICH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ICH group included 45 AF patients with a history of ICH who underwent RFCA. Five of these patients were excluded because ICH occurred spontaneously after cerebral infarction. The control group included 80 individuals who presented for AF ablation and did not have a history of ICH. Two controls were matched for each study group patient in terms of sex, age (±2 years), type of AF, and procedure date.

RESULTS

Patients in the ICH group had higher CHADS₂ (1.7 ± 1.3 vs. 1.1 ± 1.2, p < 0.05), CHA₂DS₂-VASc (2.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.05), and HAS-BLED scores (2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). All participants in both groups underwent successful RFCA. The incidence of ICH during follow-up (1 vs. 0, p = 0.333) was similar between the ICH and control groups. AF-free survival between the two groups was not significant (log-rank p = 0.283) within the first 3 months, but was significant (log-rank p = 0.011) within 48 months of RFCA. History of ICH was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence according to univariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

In AF patients with a history of ICH, AF ablation with a standard anticoagulation strategy is safe and does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage.