1
|
Schulze Westhoff M, Schröder S, Heck J, Brod T, Winkelmann M, Bleich S, Frieling H, Jahn K, Wedegärtner F, Groh A. Drug Safety Profiles of Geriatric Patients Referred to Consultation Psychiatry in the Emergency Department-A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2023; 36:407-416. [PMID: 36592403 PMCID: PMC10394965 DOI: 10.1177/08919887221149158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Geriatric patients account for a significant proportion of the collective treated by psychiatric consultation service in hospitals. In the Emergency Department (ED), psychotropic drugs are frequently recommended, notwithstanding their extensive side-effect profiles. This study sought to investigate medication safety of geriatric patients referred to psychiatric consultation service in the ED. METHODS Medication lists of 60 patients from the general internal medicine and trauma surgery EDs referred to psychiatric consultation service were analyzed. Utilizing PRISCUS list and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) classification, prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were assessed. RESULTS 84 drugs were newly prescribed following psychiatric consultations. The total number of drugs per patient was 5.4 ± 4.2 before psychiatric consultation and 6.5 ± 4.2 thereafter (p < .001). 22.6 % of the newly recommended drugs were PIMs according to the PRISCUS list, while 54.8 % were designated as therapeutic alternatives to PIMs. 54.8 % and 20.2 % of the newly recommended drugs were FORTA category C and D drugs, respectively. An average of 1.2 ± 1.7 drug-drug interactions (DDIs) existed before psychiatric consultation and 1.3 ± 1.9 DDIs thereafter (p = .08). CONCLUSION The majority of newly recommended drugs by psychiatric consultation service in the ED were designated as suitable therapeutic alternatives to PIMs according to the PRISCUS list, but had comparatively unfavorable ratings according to the FORTA classification, demonstrating discrepancies between these two PIM classification systems. Physicians delivering psychiatric consultation services in the ED should not solely rely on one PIM classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schulze Westhoff
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schröder
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Johannes Heck
- Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Torben Brod
- Emergency Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Bleich
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Helge Frieling
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kirsten Jahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Felix Wedegärtner
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Adrian Groh
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The MGPIDP-L project: Potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and its associated factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 109:104947. [PMID: 36746016 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate drug prescribing1 (PIDP) using a combination of explicit and implicit criteria in a sample of Lebanese older adults taking 5 or more chronic medications per day in ambulatory care settings and to identify which factors were associated with PIDP. The explicit criteria included five different lists: Beers, Laroche, European Union (EU(7)-PIM list), STOPP/ START, STOPP Frail, and Alert and Mastering of Iatrogenesis issued by the French High Authority of Health. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to compare the potentially inappropriate medications according to each criterion. METHODS Data were collected from each patient via a face-to-face interview. Logistic regressions were conducted to evaluate both objectives. RESULTS Many factors were positively associated with PIDP. The risk of PIDP was positively associated with age (OR =4.692, 95% CI [1.889-11.655]). Treatment for insomnia doubled the odds of PIDP (P<0.05). Participants who picked their medications from the pharmacy and had excess stock of drugs were at higher risk of having PIDP by 2.042 (95% CI [1.199-3.478]) and 2.965(95% CI [1.133-7.762]) respectively. However, patients with a perception of being heavily medicated and patients with a missed dose in the last two weeks had lower odds of PIDP. CONCLUSION Our study showed a high prevalence of PIDP in Lebanon, which is associated with various correlates. Selecting the appropriate tools to assess PIDP and providing patient education regarding the risks associated with potentially inappropriate medications are issues to be addressed among older adults.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schulze Westhoff M, Groh A, Schröder S, Proskynitopoulos PJ, Jahn K, Klietz M, Krichevsky B, Stichtenoth DO, Wedegärtner F, Bleich S, Frieling H, Heck J. Potentially inappropriate medications according to PRISCUS list and FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) classification in geriatric psychiatry: a cross-sectional study. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2022; 129:1367-1375. [PMID: 36050603 PMCID: PMC9550757 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-022-02541-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) constitute a frequent cause of hospitalization in older people. The risk of ADRs is increased by the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications for older people (PIMs). The PRISCUS list and the FORTA classification represent established tools to detect PIMs. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of PIM prescriptions on the gerontopsychiatric ward of a university hospital in Germany. To this aim, medication charts of 92 patients (mean age 75.9 ± 7.7 years; 66.3% female) were analyzed on a weekly basis until patient discharge by utilization of the PRISCUS list and the FORTA classification. Overall, 335 medication reviews comprising 2363 drug prescriptions were analyzed. 3.0% of the prescribed drugs were PIMs according to the PRISCUS list, with benzodiazepines and Z-drugs accounting for nearly half (49.3%) of all PIM prescriptions. 30.4% of the patients were prescribed at least one PRISCUS-PIM, while 43.5% of the study population took at least one FORTA class D drug. A considerable proportion of gerontopsychiatric patients were affected by PIMs; however, the overall number of PIM prescriptions in the study population was low. Further improvements in the quality of prescribing should target the use of sedating agents such as benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. Physicians should be aware of discrepancies between the PRISCUS list and the FORTA classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schulze Westhoff
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Adrian Groh
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schröder
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Phileas Johannes Proskynitopoulos
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kirsten Jahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Klietz
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Krichevsky
- Medical Service of the German Armed Forces, Kiel, Germany.,Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dirk O Stichtenoth
- Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Drug Commissioner of Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Felix Wedegärtner
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Bleich
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Helge Frieling
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Johannes Heck
- Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weinand S, Thürmann PA, Dröge P, Koetsenruijter J, Klora M, Grobe TG. [Potentially Inappropriate Medication of Nursing Home Residents: An Analysis of Risk Factors Based on National Claims Data (AOK) for 2017]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 84:448-456. [PMID: 33682911 PMCID: PMC11248649 DOI: 10.1055/a-1335-4512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) to nursing home residents using the PRISCUS list in 2017. METHODS Using claims data (AOK) we analysed insured nursing home residents aged 65 or older in 2017. The PRISCUS list was used to identify PIMs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyse risk factors. RESULTS The study population in 2017 included 259 328 nursing home residents, out of them 25.5% received at least one potentially inappropriate medication (women: 25.6%/men: 24.9%). Female and younger aged nursing home residents had a higher risk for at least one PRISCUS prescription. Polypharmacy, an increasing number of attending physicians, and hospital stays were additional risk factors for a PRISCUS prescription. Furthermore, regional (Bundesland) variations contributed to differences in PRISCUS prescriptions. CONCLUSION The frequent PIM prescriptions in nursing home residents are a relevant topic regarding drug therapy safety. Regional differences, which cannot be explained by nursing home resident characteristics, show options for modifications and the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Weinand
- Gesundheitsberichterstattung und Biometrie, aQua - Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Deutschland
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Petra A Thürmann
- Lehrstuhl für Klinische Pharmakologie, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Department Humanmedizin, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland
- Philipp Klee-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| | - Patrik Dröge
- Qualitäts- und Versorgungsforschung, Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jan Koetsenruijter
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Mike Klora
- Gesundheitsberichterstattung und Biometrie, aQua - Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Thomas G Grobe
- Gesundheitsberichterstattung und Biometrie, aQua - Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galimberti F, Olmastroni E, Casula M, Merlo I, Franchi M, Catapano AL, Orlando V, Menditto E, Tragni E, EDU.RE.DRUG Group OBO. Evaluation of Factors Associated With Appropriate Drug Prescription and Effectiveness of Informative and Educational Interventions—The EDU.RE.DRUG Project. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:832169. [PMID: 35548361 PMCID: PMC9081494 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.832169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: EDU.RE.DRUG study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, controlled, pragmatic trial directed to general practitioners (GPs) and their patients. Methods: The study data were retrieved from health-related administrative databases of four local health units (LHUs) of Lombardy and four LHUs in Campania. According to the LHUs, the GPs/patients were assigned to (A) intervention on both GPs (feedback reports about appropriate prescribing among their patients and online courses) and patients (flyers and posters on proper drug use), (B) intervention on GPs, (C) intervention on patients, and (D) no intervention (control arm). A set of appropriate prescribing indicators (potential drug–drug interactions [pDDIs], potential and unnecessary therapeutic duplicates [pTDs], and inappropriate prescriptions in the elderly [ERD-list]) were measured at baseline and after the intervention phase. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated estimating the absolute difference in percentages of selected indicators carrying out linear random-intercept mixed-effect models. Results: A cohort of 3,586 GPs (2,567 in intervention groups and 1,019 in the control group) was evaluated. In Campania, the mean pre-intervention percentage of patients with at least one pDDI was always greater than 20% and always lower than 15% in Lombardy. The pre–post difference was quite heterogeneous among the LHUs, ranging from 1.9 to −1.4 percentage points. The mean pre-intervention percentage of patients with pTDs ranged from 0.59 to 2.1%, with slightly higher values characterizing Campania LHUs. The magnitude of the pre–post difference was very low, ranging from −0.11 to 0.20. In Campania, the mean pre-intervention percentage of patients with at least one ERD criterium was considerably higher than in Lombardy (approximately 30% in Lombardy and 50% in Campania). The pre–post difference was again quite heterogeneous. The results from the models accounting for GP geographical belonging suggested that none of the interventions resulted in a statistically significant effect, for all the three indicators considered. Conclusion: The proposed strategy was shown to be not effective in influencing the voluntary changes in GP prescription performance. However, the use of a set of explicit indicators proved to be useful in quantifying the inappropriateness. Further efforts are needed to find more efficient strategies and design more tailored interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elena Olmastroni
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Casula
- IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, Italy
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Manuela Casula,
| | - Ivan Merlo
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Franchi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberico Luigi Catapano
- IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, Italy
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Orlando
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Elena Tragni
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trends and patterns in EU(7)-PIM prescribing to elderly patients in Germany. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77:1553-1561. [PMID: 33938975 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03148-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore patterns and long-term development in prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to the EU(7)-PIM list to elderly patients in Germany. METHODS We analysed anonymized German claims data. The study population comprised 6.0 million insured individuals at least 65 years old, including all their prescriptions reimbursed in 2019. For the analysis of long-term development, we used data for the years 2009-2019. Factors associated with PIM prescribing were considered from two perspectives: patient-oriented analysis was performed with logistic regression and prescriber-oriented analysis was performed with multiple linear regression. RESULTS EU(7)-PIM prevalence was reduced from 56.9% in 2009 to 45.1% in 2019. Average annual volume (DDDs/insured) decreased from 145 in 2009 to 121 in 2019. These figures are substantially greater than those for the older PRISCUS list. The majority of investigated ATC level 2 groups with the highest EU(7)-PIM DDD volume exhibited substantial decreases; moderate increases were found for antihypertensive and urological drugs. Antithrombotics increased strongly with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The most prevalent EU(7)-PIM medication was diclofenac; however, in the age group 85+ years, apixaban was twice as prevalent as diclofenac. Polypharmacy, female sex, age < 90 years, need for nursing care and living in Eastern regions were identified as risk factors. Prescriber specialty was the most marked factor in the prescriber-oriented analysis. CONCLUSION Although the use of EU(7)-PIMs has been declining, regional differences indicate considerable room for improvement. The comparison with PRISCUS highlights the necessity of regular updates of PIM lists.
Collapse
|
7
|
Seifert J, Fay B, Strueven NT, Schiekofer S, Wenzel-Seifert K, Haen E. [Adverse Drug Reactions in Geriatric Psychiatric Patients - Influence of Potentially Inappropriate Drugs]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2021; 49:37-45. [PMID: 33773503 DOI: 10.1055/a-1394-2412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which "potentially inappropriate drugs" (PID) are associated with an increased risk for adverse drug reactions (ADR). METHODS Data from 304 geriatric psychiatric inpatients was collected. Medical documentation was used to find indications of ADRs. Causal relationship between the ADR and the prescribed drugs was assessed by experts. RESULTS Almost 30 % of patients received ≥ 1 PID before admission to hospital, in comparison to 22 % at discharge. Increasing number of total prescriptions and the diagnosis of schizophrenia resulted in an increased risk for receiving ≥ 1 PID. Higher age and dementia were protective factors. Patients receiving ≥ 1 PID had a 5-fold increased risk of experiencing ≥ 1 ADR. Risk for an ADR increased with number of PID prescriptions. Patients treated with ≥ 1 PID had a 4-fold increased risk of experiencing severe ADRs. Risk for severe ADRs was 10-fold higher in patients treated with ≥ 2 PIDs. CONCLUSION The PRISCUS list predicts significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs in the geriatric psychiatric setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Seifert
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Deutschland.,Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Sozialpsychiatrie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Bianca Fay
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Nina Theresa Strueven
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Deutschland.,Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, kbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum GmbH, Wasserburg am Inn, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Schiekofer
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Ekkehard Haen
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sell R, Schaefer M. Prevalence and risk factors of drug-related problems identified in pharmacy-based medication reviews. Int J Clin Pharm 2020; 42:588-597. [PMID: 32026355 PMCID: PMC8452550 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-00976-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Medication safety is a major health concern, especially for older patients, in whom drug-related problems occur frequently as a consequence of polypharmacy and frailty, increasing the risk of adverse drug events. Objective To investigate the prevalence and types of drug-related problems in community pharmacies and to identify associated risk factors in order to adjust the focus of care. Setting 300 German community pharmacies in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany). Method In April 2015, community pharmacists conducted brown bag medication reviews for primary care patients, in which they identified and solved drug-related problems with patients or their physicians. Data from these reviews were analyzed, including frequency and nature of problems and their respective resolutions. Potentially inappropriate medications according to the PRISCUS list were identified by post hoc analysis. Risk factors for drug-related problems were determined using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Main outcome measure Prevalence and risk factors of drug-related problems. Results 1090 medication reviews were conducted. On average, patients were 72.0 ± 9.1 years old and had 10.6 ± 3.7 medications, 62.0% (n = 676) presented a medication plan. Knowledge gaps about medications were detected in almost a third of patients (n = 345). Drug-related problems were identified in 84.2% (n = 918) of patients (in 3836 medications). Frequent problems concerned drug–drug-interactions (53.7%, n = 585) as well as drug use and adherence (46.7%, n = 509). Most problems (72.2%, n = 2769) were resolved between pharmacist and patient. Knowledge gaps and the number of drugs were independently associated with a higher risk of drug-related problems. For older patients, potentially inappropriate medications were a risk factor in bivariate, but not in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Pharmacists identified and resolved considerable rates of drug-related problems, suggesting that they are capable and well-positioned to conduct medication reviews. Knowledge gaps, the number of drugs, patient age and, in older patients, potentially inappropriate medications may indicate an increased risk for drug-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Sell
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roux B, Sirois C, Simard M, Gagnon ME, Laroche ML. One-year persistence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: A population-based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:1062-1080. [PMID: 31916266 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess the 1-year persistence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and identify associated factors in community-dwelling older adults in Quebec, Canada. METHODS A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Individuals insured by the public drug plan and aged ≥66 years who initiated a PIM between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015 were followed-up for 1 year. PIMs were identified using the 2015 Beers criteria. One-year persistence of PIM use was defined as continuous treatment with any PIM, without interruption for more than 60 days between prescriptions refills. Poisson regression models were performed to identify factors associated with 1-year persistence of any PIM. RESULTS In total, 25.1% of PIM initiators were persistent at 1 year. In non-persistent individuals, the median time to PIM discontinuation was 31 days (interquartile range 21-92). Individuals were more persistent at 1 year with antipsychotics (43.9%), long-duration sulphonylureas (40.2%), antiarrhythmics/immediate-release nifedipine (36.5%) and proton pump inhibitors (36.0%). Factors significantly associated with persistence were an increased age, being a man and having a high number of medications and chronic diseases, especially dementia, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS One-quarter of community-dwelling older adults are continuously exposed to PIMs. To optimize medication prescribing in the older population, further interventions are needed to limit the use of PIMs most likely to be continued, especially in individuals most at risk of being persistent and also particularly vulnerable to adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Roux
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France.,INSERM UMR 1248, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.,Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, Canada
| | - Caroline Sirois
- Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.,Centre of Excellence on Aging of Quebec, Integrated University Health and Social Services Centres of the Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada
| | - Marc Simard
- Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Gagnon
- Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France.,INSERM UMR 1248, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mielke N, Huscher D, Douros A, Ebert N, Gaedeke J, van der Giet M, Kuhlmann MK, Martus P, Schaeffner E. Self-reported medication in community-dwelling older adults in Germany: results from the Berlin Initiative Study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:22. [PMID: 31964342 PMCID: PMC6974973 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1430-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older adults have the highest drug utilization due to multimorbidity. Although the number of people over age 70 is expected to double within the next decades, population-based data on their medication patterns are scarce especially in combination with polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). Our objective was to analyse the frequency of polypharmacy, pattern of prescription (PD) and over-the-counter (OTC) drug usage, and PIMs according to age and gender in a population-based cohort of very old adults in Germany. Methods Cross-sectional baseline data of the Berlin Initiative Study, a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years with a standardized interview including demographics, lifestyle variables, co-morbidities, and medication assessment were analysed. Medication data were coded using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. Age- and sex-standardized descriptive analysis of polypharmacy (≥5 drugs, PD and OTC vs. PD only and regular and on demand drugs vs regular only), medication frequency and distribution, including PIMs, was performed by age (</≥80) and gender. Results Of 2069 participants with an average age of 79.5 years, 97% (95%CI [96%;98%]) took at least one drug and on average 6.2 drugs (SD = 3.5) with about 40 to 66% fulfilling the criteria of polypharmacy depending on the definition. Regarding drug type more female participants took a combination of PD and OTC (male: 68%, 95%CI [65%;72%]); female: 78%, 95%CI [76%;80%]). Most frequently used were drugs for cardiovascular diseases (85%, 95%CI [83%;86%]). Medication frequency increased among participants aged ≥80 years, especially for cardiovascular drugs, antithrombotics, psychoanaleptics and dietary supplements. Among the top ten prescription drugs were mainly cardiovascular drugs including lipid-lowering agents (simvastatin), beta-blockers (metoprolol, bisoprolol) and ACE inhibitors (ramipril). The most common OTC drug was acetylsalicylic acid (35%; 95%CI [33%;37%])). Dose-independent PIM were identified for 15% of the participants. Conclusions Polypharmacy was excessive in older adults, with not only PD but also OTC drugs contributing to the high point prevalence. The medication patterns reflected the treatment of chronic diseases in this age group. There was even an increase in medication frequency between below and above 80 years especially for drugs of cardiovascular diseases, antithrombotic medication, psychoanaleptics, and dietary supplements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Mielke
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dörte Huscher
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonios Douros
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Natalie Ebert
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Gaedeke
- Departement of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus van der Giet
- Departement of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin K Kuhlmann
- Department of Nephrology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Martus
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Biostatistics, Eberhard Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Elke Schaeffner
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
[Which factors are associated with the use of potentially inadequate medications (PIM) in the elderly? : Results from the German health interview and examination survey (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2019; 61:40-51. [PMID: 29138901 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2654-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrate a relationship between the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) for patients 65 years or older and an increased risk for adverse events, in particular hospitalisations. The RKI conducted DEGS1-Survey ("German health interview and examination survey for adults") provides a representative sample of the target population to identify determinants for PIM use. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine characteristics of older persons in Germany, who currently use PIM, and if there are subpopulations among older persons with a particularly high PIM use. METHODS Within the DEGS1-Survey a total of 175 variables regarding health and social aspects were documented from 1392 community-dwelling persons between 65 and 79 years of age, and medication intake during the last seven days was recorded. PIM drugs were identified according to the PRISCUS list. Associations between PIM use and variables recorded were evaluated by means of multivariate statistical models. RESULTS Within seven days before the survey PIM drugs were used by 13.0% (95%-CI: 10.7-15.6) of the respondents. The following factors significantly increase the risk for receiving a PIM: number of drugs taken in the last seven days; number of visits to different physician specialists during the last 12 months; sleep disorders; psychiatric condition, and diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system. The majority of PIMs were antidepressants and anxiolytics/sedatives. Elderly women with depression, sleep disorders, and a need for analgesics are particularly affected by increased PIM use. They deserve special attention in this regard.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ma Z, Zhang C, Cui X, Liu L. Comparison of three criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in Chinese older adults. Clin Interv Aging 2018; 14:65-72. [PMID: 30643395 PMCID: PMC6312397 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s190983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among Chinese aged patients using the Beers criteria of 2015, the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) of 2014 and the criteria of PIMs for older adults in China (Chinese criteria), and to identify the correlates of the PIMs' use. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among geriatric patients at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital between January 2018 and March 2018. Three criteria (the Beers criteria of 2015, the STOPP criteria of 2014 and the Chinese criteria) were used to detect PIMs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine factors associated with the use of PIMs. Leading PIMs for each set of criteria were also listed. The concordance among the three PIM criteria was calculated using kappa tests. Results Totally, 863 inpatients aged ≥65 years were included. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one PIM was 80.2%, 58.1% and 44.0% according to the Chinese criteria, 2015 Beers criteria and 2014 STOPP criteria, respectively. The Beers and the STOPP criteria indicated a moderate coherence, whereas the Chinese criteria showed poor concordance with the other two criteria. Proton-pump inhibitors in the Beers and STOPP criteria and clopidogrel in the PIM-Chinese accounted for most leading PIMs. The most important factor associated with PIM use by all three sets of criteria was the number of prescribed medications. Conclusion Data showed a high PIM prevalence among older adults in China, which was associated with the number of prescribed medications. The Chinese criteria had the highest detection rate but a poor concordance with the Beers and STOPP criteria (P<0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Ma
- Pharmacy Department of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Caixia Zhang
- Pharmacy Department of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, ; .,Pharmacy Department of Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangli Cui
- Pharmacy Department of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Lihong Liu
- Pharmacy Department of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, ;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoon SJ, Kim JS, Jung JG, Ahn SK, Song YS, Bae NK, Seon JY, Kim JH. Factors associated with potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in older Korean people: A population-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18:1378-1382. [PMID: 30094910 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The present study investigated the status of potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (PHDI) in older adults, to obtain insight into factors that influence the risk of PHDI. METHODS The present study included Korean people aged ≥65 years who were prescribed one or more drugs included in the list of PHDI under the Beers Criteria 2015 from January to December, 2016 (n = 1 257 317). PHDI were defined based on the Beers Criteria 2015. Among 10 PHDI, a prevalence of >5% was taken to be clinically significant, and the relationships between multiple variables and PHDI were examined. RESULTS The most frequent PHDI was corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 259 499, 20.64%), followed by a combination of two or more anticholinergic drugs (n = 139 622, 11.1%), and three or more drugs acting on the central nervous system (n = 86 023, 6.84%). These three types of PHDI were more frequent in women (OR 1.066-1.141) and medical aid beneficiaries (OR 1.095-1.510). The risk of PHDI increased in proportion to the number of healthcare institutions used by the participants and their outpatient visits during the year (OR 1.043-1.079, 1.008-1.010, respectively). The risk of PHDI was low when patients took no more than five medications in a single prescription (OR 0.017-0.791). CONCLUSIONS The findings of the present study highlight the three most frequent PHDI in Korea according to the Beers Criteria 2015. Healthcare providers should take PHDI into account when treating female patients, medical aid beneficiaries, patients using multiple healthcare institutions, frequent outpatient visitors and patients prescribed more than six medications in a single prescription. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1378-1382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok-Joon Yoon
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jong-Sung Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jin-Gyu Jung
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Soon-Ki Ahn
- Public Health and Medical Service Office, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Young-Su Song
- Department of Long-term Care Service for Elderly, Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Nam-Kyou Bae
- Department of Long-term Care Service for Elderly, Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Yeon Seon
- Department of Long-term Care Service for Elderly, Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hyun Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guha S, Harikrishnan S, Ray S, Sethi R, Ramakrishnan S, Banerjee S, Bahl VK, Goswami KC, Banerjee AK, Shanmugasundaram S, Kerkar PG, Seth S, Yadav R, Kapoor A, Mahajan AU, Mohanan PP, Mishra S, Deb PK, Narasimhan C, Pancholia AK, Sinha A, Pradhan A, Alagesan R, Roy A, Vora A, Saxena A, Dasbiswas A, Srinivas BC, Chattopadhyay BP, Singh BP, Balachandar J, Balakrishnan KR, Pinto B, Manjunath CN, Lanjewar CP, Jain D, Sarma D, Paul GJ, Zachariah GA, Chopra HK, Vijayalakshmi IB, Tharakan JA, Dalal JJ, Sawhney JPS, Saha J, Christopher J, Talwar KK, Chandra KS, Venugopal K, Ganguly K, Hiremath MS, Hot M, Das MK, Bardolui N, Deshpande NV, Yadava OP, Bhardwaj P, Vishwakarma P, Rajput RK, Gupta R, Somasundaram S, Routray SN, Iyengar SS, Sanjay G, Tewari S, G S, Kumar S, Mookerjee S, Nair T, Mishra T, Samal UC, Kaul U, Chopra VK, Narain VS, Raj V, Lokhandwala Y. CSI position statement on management of heart failure in India. Indian Heart J 2018; 70 Suppl 1:S1-S72. [PMID: 30122238 PMCID: PMC6097178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Santanu Guha
- Chairman, CSI Guidelines Committee; Medical College Kolkata, India
| | - S Harikrishnan
- Chief Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
| | - Saumitra Ray
- Convenor, CSI Guidelines Committee; Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Kolkata
| | - Rishi Sethi
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; KG Medical University, Lucknow
| | - S Ramakrishnan
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Suvro Banerjee
- Joint Convenor, CSI Guidelines Committee; Apollo Hospitals, Kolkata
| | - V K Bahl
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - K C Goswami
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amal Kumar Banerjee
- Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - S Shanmugasundaram
- Department of Cardiology, Tamil Nadu Medical University, Billroth Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Sandeep Seth
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Yadav
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Aditya Kapoor
- Department of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ajaykumar U Mahajan
- Department of Cardiology, LokmanyaTilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - P P Mohanan
- Department of Cardiology, Westfort Hi Tech Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Sundeep Mishra
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - P K Deb
- Daffodil Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - C Narasimhan
- Department of Cardiology & Chief of Electro Physiology Department, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - A K Pancholia
- Clinical & Preventive Cardiology, Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | | | - Akshyaya Pradhan
- Department of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - R Alagesan
- The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ambuj Roy
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amit Vora
- Arrhythmia Associates, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anita Saxena
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - B P Singh
- Department of Cardiology, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India
| | | | - K R Balakrishnan
- Cardiac Sciences, Fortis Malar Hospital, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Brian Pinto
- Holy Family Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - C N Manjunath
- Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Dharmendra Jain
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Dipak Sarma
- Cardiology & Critical Care, Jorhat Christian Medical Centre Hospital, Jorhat, Assam, India
| | - G Justin Paul
- Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | - I B Vijayalakshmi
- Bengaluru Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - J A Tharakan
- Department of Cardiology, P.K. Das Institute of Medical Sciences, Vaniamkulam, Palakkad, Kerala, India
| | - J J Dalal
- Kokilaben Hospital, Mumbai, Maharshtra, India
| | - J P S Sawhney
- Department of Cardiology, Dharma Vira Heart Center, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jayanta Saha
- Chairman, CSI Guidelines Committee; Medical College Kolkata, India
| | | | - K K Talwar
- Max Healthcare, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - K Sarat Chandra
- Indo-US Super Speciality Hospital & Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - K Venugopal
- Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Tiruvalla, Kerala, India
| | - Kajal Ganguly
- Department of Cardiology, N.R.S. Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | | | - Milind Hot
- Department of CTVS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Mrinal Kanti Das
- B.M. Birla Heart Research Centre & CMRI, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Neil Bardolui
- Department of Cardiology, Excelcare Hospitals, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Niteen V Deshpande
- Cardiac Cath Lab, Spandan Heart Institute and Research Center, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - O P Yadava
- National Heart Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Prashant Bhardwaj
- Department of Cardiology, Military Hospital (Cardio Thoracic Centre), Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pravesh Vishwakarma
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; KG Medical University, Lucknow
| | | | - Rakesh Gupta
- JROP Institute of Echocardiography, New Delhi, India
| | | | - S N Routray
- Department of Cardiology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
| | - S S Iyengar
- Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - G Sanjay
- Chief Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
| | - Satyendra Tewari
- Department of Cardiology, Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Soumitra Kumar
- Convenor, CSI Guidelines Committee; Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Kolkata
| | - Soura Mookerjee
- Chairman, CSI Guidelines Committee; Medical College Kolkata, India
| | - Tiny Nair
- Department of Cardiology, P.R.S. Hospital, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
| | - Trinath Mishra
- Department of Cardiology, M.K.C.G. Medical College, Behrampur, Odisha, India
| | | | - U Kaul
- Batra Heart Center & Batra Hospital and Medical Research Center, New Delhi, India
| | - V K Chopra
- Heart Failure Programme, Department of Cardiology, Medanta Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - V S Narain
- Joint Coordinator, CSI HF Position Statement; KG Medical University, Lucknow
| | - Vimal Raj
- Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Yash Lokhandwala
- Mumbai & Visiting Faculty, Sion Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pohontsch NJ, Heser K, Löffler A, Haenisch B, Parker D, Luck T, Riedel-Heller SG, Maier W, Jessen F, Scherer M. General practitioners' views on (long-term) prescription and use of problematic and potentially inappropriate medication for oldest-old patients-A qualitative interview study with GPs (CIM-TRIAD study). BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2017; 18:22. [PMID: 28212616 PMCID: PMC5395870 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0595-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is defined as medication with uncertain therapeutic effects and/or potential adverse drug reactions outweighing the clinical benefits. The prescription rate of PIM for oldest-old patients is high despite the existence of lists of PIM (e.g. the PRISCUS list) and efforts to raise awareness. This study aims at identifying general practitioners’ views on PIM and aspects affecting the (long-term) use of PIM. Methods As part of the CIM-TRIAD study, we conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 47 general practitioners, discussing 25 patients with and 22 without PIM (according to the PRISCUS list). The interview guideline included generic and patient-specific questions. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. We content analyzed the interviews using deductive and inductive category development. Results The majority of the general practitioners were not aware of the PRISCUS list. Agents deemed potentially inappropriate from the general practitioners’ point of view and the PRISCUS list are not completely superimposable. General practitioners named their criteria to identify appropriate medication for elderly patients (e.g. renal function, cognitive state) and emphasized the importance of monitoring. We identified prescription- (e.g. benzodiazepines on alternative private prescription), medication- (e.g. subjective perception that PIM has no alternative), general practitioner- (e.g. general practitioner relies on specialists), patient- (e.g. “demanding high-user”, positive subjective benefit-risk-ratio) and system-related aspects (e.g. specialists lacking holistic view, interface problems) related to the (long term) use of PIM. Conclusions While the PRISCUS list does not seem to play a decisive role in general practice, general practitioners are well aware of risks associated with PIM. Our study identifies some starting points for a safer handling of PIM, e.g. stronger dissemination of the PRISCUS list, better compensation of medication reviews, “positive lists”, adequate patient information, multifaceted interventions and improved communication between general practitioners and specialists. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0595-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Janis Pohontsch
- Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Kathrin Heser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Antje Löffler
- Institute of Health, Brandenburg University of Technology, Großenhainer Straße 57, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Britta Haenisch
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany
| | - Debora Parker
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Luck
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Steffi G Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.,Clinic and polyclinic for psychiatry and psychotherapy, University Medical Center Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Scherer
- Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grina D, Briedis V. The use of potentially inappropriate medications among the Lithuanian elderly according to Beers and EU(7)-PIM list - a nationwide cross-sectional study on reimbursement claims data. J Clin Pharm Ther 2017; 42:195-200. [DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Grina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy; Lithuanian University of Health Sciences; Kaunas Lithuania
| | - V. Briedis
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy; Lithuanian University of Health Sciences; Kaunas Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jäger C, Freund T, Steinhäuser J, Stock C, Krisam J, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Wensing M, Szecsenyi J. Impact of a tailored program on the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for multimorbid patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices-results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2017; 12:8. [PMID: 28086976 PMCID: PMC5237147 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0535-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbid patients receiving polypharmacy represent a growing population at high risk for negative health outcomes. Tailoring is an approach of systematic intervention development taking account of previously identified determinants of practice. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a tailored program to improve the implementation of three important processes of care for this patient group: (a) structured medication counseling including brown bag reviews, (b) the use of medication lists, and (c) structured medication reviews to reduce potentially inappropriate medication. METHODS We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial with a follow-up time of 9 months. Participants were general practitioners (GPs) organized in quality circles and participating in a GP-centered care contract of a German health insurance. Patients aged >50 years, suffering from at least 3 chronic diseases, receiving more than 4 drugs, and being at high risk for medication-related events according to the assessment of the treating GP were enrolled. The tailored program consisted of a workshop for GPs and health care assistants, educational materials and reminders for patients, and the elaboration of implementation action plans. The primary outcome was the change in the degree of implementation between baseline and follow-up, measured by a summary score of 10 indicators. The indicators were based on structured surveys with patients and GPs. RESULTS We analyzed the data of 21 GPs (10 - intervention group, 11 - control group) and 273 patients (130 - intervention group, 143 - control group). The increase in the degree of implementation was 4.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -0.3, 8.6) higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = 0.1). Two of the 10 indicators were significantly improved in the intervention group: medication counseling (p = 0.017) and brown bag review (p = 0.012). Secondary outcomes showed an effect on patients' self-reported use of medication lists when buying drugs in the pharmacy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The tailored program may improve implementation of medication counseling and brown bag review whereas the use of medication lists and medication reviews did not improve. No effect of the tailored program on the combined primary outcome could be substantiated. Due to limitations of the study, results have to be interpreted carefully. The factors facilitating and hindering successful implementation will be examined in a comprehensive process evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN34664024 , assigned 14/08/2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Jäger
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 4.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Freund
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 4.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jost Steinhäuser
- Institute of Family Medicine, UniversityHospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzburger Allee 160, Haus 50, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Stock
- Department of Medical Biometry, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 12.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Department of Medical Biometry, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 12.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Kaufmann-Kolle
- Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, (AQUA-Institute), Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 4.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 4.OG, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wucherer D, Eichler T, Hertel J, Kilimann I, Richter S, Michalowsky B, Thyrian JR, Teipel S, Hoffmann W. Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Community-Dwelling Primary Care Patients who were Screened Positive for Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 55:691-701. [PMID: 27716668 PMCID: PMC5147617 DOI: 10.3233/jad-160581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in older people is a risk factor for adverse drug effects. This risk is even higher in older people with dementia (PWD). OBJECTIVE Our study aimed to determine (1) the prevalence of PIM among primary care patients who were screened positive for dementia and (2) the sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with the use of PIM. METHODS DelpHi-MV (Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) is a general practitioner-based, cluster-randomized, controlled intervention study to implement and evaluate an innovative concept of collaborative dementia care management in Germany. The comprehensive baseline assessment includes a home medication review. The present analyses are based on the data from 448 study participants (age 70+, DemTect <9). PIMs were identified using the list of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Elderly (Priscus). RESULTS (1) A total of 99 study participants (22%) received at least one PIM. The highest prevalence was found for antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and analgetics. The most frequently prescribed PIMs were amitriptyline, etoricoxib, and doxazosin. (2) Use of a PIM was significantly associated with a diagnosis of a mental or behavioral disorder. CONCLUSIONS The prescription rate of PIMs for community-dwelling PWD was comparable with the rates found for the general population of older people in Germany (20-29%). Antidepressants with anticholinergic properties and long-acting benzodiazepines were the most prescribed PIMs, despite having an unfavorable benefit-risk ratio. This high prevalence of PIM prescriptions in a vulnerable population of PWD indicates that standard care for dementia should include careful medication review and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Wucherer
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Tilly Eichler
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Johannes Hertel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ingo Kilimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Steffen Richter
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bernhard Michalowsky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jochen René Thyrian
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cvetinovic N, Loncar G, Farkas J. Heart failure management in the elderly - a public health challenge. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 128:466-473. [PMID: 27900534 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1138-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing public health problem and the leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization in populations > 65 years. The elderly HF patients have an increased prevalence of HF with preserved ejection fraction and comorbidities, may present with atypical symptoms and signs, have a higher risk for adverse drug reactions, and worse prognosis as compared with younger patients. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence-based therapies for this population because they are underrepresented in the clinical trials. The elderly are less likely to be evaluated by a cardiologist and to be treated in accordance with recommendations of the current HF guidelines. Although the treatment is improving, it is still suboptimal; therefore, HF in elderly patients requires mobilization of public health services and improvement of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasa Cvetinovic
- Cardiology Department, Clinical Hospital Center Zvezdara, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Goran Loncar
- Cardiology Department, Clinical Hospital Center Zvezdara, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jerneja Farkas
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Voga G, Kovačić D. The relativity of age or geriatric medicine at the crossroads. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 128:430-432. [PMID: 27873025 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1128-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gorazd Voga
- Dpt. of Intensive Internal Medicine, General Hospital Celje, Oblakova 5, 3000, Celje, Slovenia.
| | - Dragan Kovačić
- Dpt. of Cardiology, General Hospital Celje, Oblakova 5, 3000, Celje, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hyttinen V, Taipale H, Tanskanen A, Tiihonen J, Tolppanen AM, Hartikainen S, Valtonen H. Risk Factors for Initiation of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Community-Dwelling Older Adults with and without Alzheimer’s Disease. Drugs Aging 2016; 34:67-77. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-016-0415-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Chang CB, Yang SY, Lai HY, Wu RS, Liu HC, Hsu HY, Hwang SJ, Chan DC. Application of three different sets of explicit criteria for assessing inappropriate prescribing in older patients: a nationwide prevalence study of ambulatory care visits in Taiwan. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008214. [PMID: 26546136 PMCID: PMC4636615 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the national prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed in ambulatory care clinics in Taiwan according to three different sets of regional criteria and the correlates of PIM use. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING This analysis included older patients who visited ambulatory care clinics in 2009 and represented half of the older population included on the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database. PARTICIPANTS We identified 1,164,701 subjects who visited ambulatory care clinics and were over 65 years old in 2009. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES PIM prevalence according to the 2012 Beers criteria, the PIM-Taiwan criteria and the PRISCUS criteria was estimated separately, and characteristics of PIM users were explored. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine patient factors associated with the use of at least one PIM. Leading PIMs for each set of criteria were also listed. RESULTS The prevalence of having at least one PIM at the patient level was highest with the Beers criteria (86.2%), followed by the PIM-Taiwan criteria (73.3%) and the PRISCUS criteria (66.9%). Polypharmacy and younger age were associated with PIM use for all three sets of criteria. The leading PIMs detected by the PIM-Taiwan and PRISCUS criteria were all included in the 2012 Beers criteria. Non-COX-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the Beers criteria and benzodiazepines in the PIM-Taiwan and PRISCUS criteria accounted for most leading PIMs. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of PIMs was high among older Taiwanese patients receiving ambulatory care visits. The prevalence of PIM and its associated factors varied according to three sets of criteria at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirn-Bin Chang
- Division of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Chu-Tung Branch, Hsinchu County, Taiwan
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Yang
- College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Yun Lai
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
| | - Ru-Shu Wu
- Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Cheng Liu
- Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Ying Hsu
- Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shinn-Jang Hwang
- Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei,Taiwan
| | - Ding-Cheng Chan
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Superintedent Office, National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Hsinchu County, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Henschel F, Redaelli M, Siegel M, Stock S. Correlation of Incident Potentially Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions and Hospitalization: An Analysis Based on the PRISCUS List. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2015; 2:249-259. [PMID: 27747571 PMCID: PMC4883217 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-015-0035-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multimorbidity and polypharmacy represent a major problem for elderly patients. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is highly prevalent among the elderly. PIMs are considered high-risk drugs and are suspected to be responsible for adverse drug events (ADEs) leading to hospitalization. Objective The objective of this study was to determine hospitalization rates related to selected ADEs in elderly patients with an incident prescription of a PIM as defined by the PRISCUS list. A second objective was to identify other factors independently associated with hospitalization. Methods We retrospectively analysed a full census of pharmaceutical claims, from one of the largest public sickness funds in Germany, for 647,073 patients aged ≥65 years in 2010, the year of publication of the PRISCUS list. Patients who received an incident PIM in 2010 were assigned to the intervention group. Propensity score matching was used to build a control group of patients at a comparable risk level who received an incident equivalent non-PIM. The risk of hospitalization due to PIM prescription was estimated via the odds ratio (OR). Risk factors were analysed via logistic regression models. Results The results showed significantly more ADEs in the PIM group. The OR for hospitalization was 1.54 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.23–1.93] for patients receiving any PIM compared with those who received a non-PIM. This trend remained stable [OR 1.46 (95 % CI 1.16–1.84)] after adjustment for relevant covariates in the logistic regression models showing ORs for each risk factor. Besides PIMs, common risk factors such as greater age, comorbidity and specific drug classes were significantly responsible for hospitalization. Conclusion PIMs (as defined by the PRISCUS list) are associated with high rates of ADEs associated with hospitalization. Our study suggests that PIM reduction may result in a lower risk of hospitalization in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Henschel
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Cologne University Hospital, Gleueler Strasse 176–178, 50935 Köln, Germany
| | - Marcus Redaelli
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Cologne University Hospital, Gleueler Strasse 176–178, 50935 Köln, Germany
- Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Siegel
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Cologne University Hospital, Gleueler Strasse 176–178, 50935 Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|