1
|
Ringnér A, Björk M, Olsson C. Effects of Person-Centered Information for Parents of Children With Cancer (the PIFBO Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY NURSING 2023; 40:400-410. [PMID: 36731493 DOI: 10.1177/27527530221115860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background: Conveying information to parents is a core part of pediatric oncology nursing; however, most published interventions do not tailor information to individual parental needs. Objective: To evaluate the effect on parental illness-related stress of person-centered information provided to parents of children with cancer. Methods: A multicenter, unblinded randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms recruiting parents of children diagnosed within the past two months from two tertiary children's cancer centers in Sweden. Parents were randomized using sealed envelopes prepared and opened by an independent person. Parents in the intervention arm met four times with experienced nurses trained in the intervention, whereas controls received standard care. The effect of the intervention was measured five times regarding parents' illness-related stress. Secondary outcomes were psychosocial states, experiences with healthcare providers, and received information. Further, we collected process data on the intervention's content and fidelity. Results: Of the 32 parents included and analyzed in the study, 16 were randomized to the intervention, which addressed a broad variety of topics. The intervention increased parents' knowledge about the biophysiological and functional aspects of their child's illness, but it had no measurable effect on their distress. Discussion: Although fidelity to the intervention protocol was sufficient, the study was flawed by recruitment difficulties, primarily due to organizational factors, which may have prevented us from observing any possible effects on psychosocial distress. Having a person-centered perspective could be promising for future studies aimed at parents of children with cancer. (Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02332226.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Ringnér
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Clinical Department of Pediatrics, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Maria Björk
- CHILD Research Group, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Olsson
- Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
- Department of Bachelor Education, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marino LV, Collaḉo N, Coyne S, Leppan M, Ridgeway S, Bharucha T, Cochrane C, Fandinga C, Palframan K, Rees L, Osman A, Johnson MJ, Hurley-Wallace A, Darlington ASE. The Development of a Communication Tool to Aid Parent-Centered Communication between Parents and Healthcare Professionals: A Quality Improvement Project. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2706. [PMID: 37893780 PMCID: PMC10606263 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Good communication is central to good healthcare. As a result of poor communication between parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in clinical settings, this study aimed to address this problem by developing a communication tool to empower parents and act as a prompt for HCPs to talk about the child's care and gather information at the point of admission to hospital about what is important to families, therefore supporting patient-centered communication. A design thinking process was used to develop a physical copy of Chloe's card and evaluate its use. Design thinking is a problem-solving approach, which uses an empathetic lens to integrate viewpoints of different stakeholders throughout the process of creating solutions. Design thinking involves five processes: (1) empathise-including a literature review and data synthesis, (2) define-by completing semi-structured interviews with parents about their experience of communication and HCPs perceptions of parent's experience of communication, (3) ideate-iterate the design of Chloe's card with parents and HCPs, (4) prototype-develop the design of Chloe's card, and (5) test-pilot test in clinical practice. Results from this initial study suggest that a small hand-held card, with emoticons and a place to write concerns, was acceptable to parents and feasible to use in clinical practice. Parents do not always feel heard by HCPs and a tool such as Chloe's card may help facilitate sharing of information about matters important to them and their child. However, some HCPs felt the need for a communication tool undermined their clinical skills. Feedback from HCP participants suggests that the idea of Chloe's card was acceptable and perceived as potentially being useful in clinical practice. Further work is required, as part of a larger study, to further refine this communication tool, identify those parents who would benefit most from Chloe's card, as well as to further refine the HCP process prior to implementing it into clinical settings. It was noted future iterations would benefit from a digital version linked with a child's electronic record, as well as multi-language versions and information for parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luise V Marino
- Paediatric Intensive Care, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Nicole Collaḉo
- School of Health Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tara Bharucha
- Paediatric Cardiology, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Colette Cochrane
- Paediatric Cardiology, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Catarina Fandinga
- Department of Dietetics/Speech Language Therapy, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Karla Palframan
- Department of Dietetics/Speech Language Therapy, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Leanne Rees
- Department of Dietetics/Speech Language Therapy, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ahmed Osman
- Paediatric Intensive Care, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Mark J Johnson
- Neonatal Medicine, Princess Anne Hospital, University Southampton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mukherjee S, Richardson N, Beresford B. Hospital healthcare experiences of children and young people with life-threatening or life-shortening conditions, and their parents: scoping reviews and resultant conceptual frameworks. BMC Pediatr 2023; 23:366. [PMID: 37460965 PMCID: PMC10351142 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient experience is a core component of healthcare quality. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used to assess this, but there are few paediatric PREMs. This paper reports the first stage of developing two such measures, one for children and young people (0-18 years) (CYP) with a life-threatening or life-shortening condition (LT/LSC), and one for their parents. It comprised parallel scoping reviews of qualitative evidence on the elements of health service delivery and care that matter to, or impact on, CYP (Review 1) and parents (Review 2). METHODS Medline and PsychINFO (1/1/2010 - 11/8/2020) and CINAHL Complete (1/1/2010 - 4/7/2020) were searched and records identified screened against inclusion criteria. A thematic approach was used to manage and analyse relevant data, informed by existing understandings of patient/family experiences as comprising aspects of staff's attributes, their actions and behaviours, and organisational features. The objective was to identity the data discrete elements of health service delivery and care which matter to, or impact on, CYP or parents which, when organised under higher order conceptual domains, created separate conceptual frameworks. RESULTS 18,531 records were identified. Sparsity of data on community-based services meant the reviews focused only on hospital-based (inpatient and outpatient) experiences. 53 studies were included in Review 1 and 64 in Review 2. For Review 1 (CYP), 36 discrete elements of healthcare experience were identified and organized under 8 higher order domains (e.g. staff's empathetic qualities; information-sharing/decision making; resources for socializing/play). In Review 2 (parents), 55 elements were identified and organized under 9 higher order domains. Some domains were similar to those identified in Review 1 (e.g. professionalism; information-sharing/decision-making), others were unique (e.g. supporting parenting; access to additional support). CONCLUSIONS Multiple and wide-ranging aspects of the way hospital healthcare is organized and delivered matters to and impacts on CYP with LT/LSCs, and their parents. The aspects that matter differ between CYP and parents, highlighting the importance of measuring and understanding CYP and parent experience seperately. These findings are key to the development of patient/parent experience measures for this patient population and the resultant conceptual frameworks have potential application in service development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Mukherjee
- Social Policy Research Unit, School of Business and Society, University of York, York, YO10 5ZF, UK.
| | - Natalie Richardson
- Social Policy Research Unit, School of Business and Society, University of York, York, YO10 5ZF, UK
| | - Bryony Beresford
- Social Policy Research Unit, School of Business and Society, University of York, York, YO10 5ZF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Norbäck K, Höglund AT, Godskesen T, Frygner-Holm S. Ethical concerns when recruiting children with cancer for research: Swedish healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:23. [PMID: 36918868 PMCID: PMC10012289 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00901-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research is crucial to improve treatment, survival and quality of life for children with cancer. However, recruitment of children for research raises ethical challenges. The aim of this study was to explore and describe ethical values and challenges related to the recruitment of children with cancer for research, from the perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals in the Swedish context. Another aim was to explore their perceptions of research ethics competence in recruiting children for research. METHODS An explorative qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants. Seven physicians and ten nurses were interviewed. Interviews were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The respondents' ethical challenges and values in recruitment mainly concerned establishing relationships and trust, meeting informational needs, acknowledging vulnerability, and balancing roles and interests. Ensuring ethical competence was raised as important, and interpersonal and communicative skills were highlighted. CONCLUSION This study provides empirical insight into recruitment of children with cancer, from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. It also contributes to the understanding of recruitment as a relational process, where aspects of vulnerability, trust and relationship building are important, alongside meeting informational needs. The results provide knowledge on the complexities raised by paediatric research and underpin the importance of building research ethics competence to ensure that the rights and interests of children with cancer are protected in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajsa Norbäck
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Anna T Höglund
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tove Godskesen
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Box 11189, 100 61, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Frygner-Holm
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Box 564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- Physiotherapy and behavioral medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Box 593, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chow AJ, Iverson R, Lamoureux M, Tingley K, Jordan I, Pallone N, Smith M, Al-Baldawi Z, Chakraborty P, Brehaut J, Chan A, Cohen E, Dyack S, Gillis LJ, Goobie S, Graham ID, Greenberg CR, Grimshaw JM, Hayeems RZ, Jain-Ghai S, Jolly A, Khangura S, MacKenzie JJ, Major N, Mitchell JJ, Nicholls SG, Pender A, Potter M, Prasad C, Prosser LA, Schulze A, Siriwardena K, Sparkes R, Speechley K, Stockler S, Taljaard M, Teitelbaum M, Trakadis Y, van Karnebeek C, Walia JS, Wilson BJ, Wilson K, Potter BK. Families' healthcare experiences for children with inherited metabolic diseases: protocol for a mixed methods cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055664. [PMID: 35193919 PMCID: PMC8867352 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) often have complex and intensive healthcare needs and their families face challenges in receiving high-quality, family centred health services. Improvement in care requires complex interventions involving multiple components and stakeholders, customised to specific care contexts. This study aims to comprehensively understand the healthcare experiences of children with IMDs and their families across Canada. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-stage explanatory sequential mixed methods design will be used. Stage 1: quantitative data on healthcare networks and encounter experiences will be collected from 100 parent/guardians through a care map, 2 baseline questionnaires and 17 weekly diaries over 5-7 months. Care networks will be analysed using social network analysis. Relationships between demographic or clinical variables and ratings of healthcare experiences across a range of family centred care dimensions will be analysed using generalised linear regression. Other quantitative data related to family experiences and healthcare experiences will be summarised descriptively. Ongoing analysis of quantitative data and purposive, maximum variation sampling will inform sample selection for stage 2: a subset of stage 1 participants will participate in one-on-one videoconference interviews to elaborate on the quantitative data regarding care networks and healthcare experiences. Interview data will be analysed thematically. Qualitative and quantitative data will be merged during analysis to arrive at an enhanced understanding of care experiences. Quantitative and qualitative data will be combined and presented narratively using a weaving approach (jointly on a theme-by-theme basis) and visually in a side-by-side joint display. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol and procedures were approved by the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario's Research Ethics Board, the University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board and the research ethics boards of each participating study centre. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea J Chow
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Iverson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kylie Tingley
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nicole Pallone
- Patient Partner, Canadian PKU & Allied Disorders Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Smith
- Patient Partner, Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zobaida Al-Baldawi
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pranesh Chakraborty
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alicia Chan
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Dyack
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lisa Jane Gillis
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, USA
| | - Sharan Goobie
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl R Greenberg
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shailly Jain-Ghai
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ann Jolly
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Contagion Consulting Group, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Khangura
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer J MacKenzie
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathalie Major
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - John J Mitchell
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stuart G Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Pender
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Murray Potter
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chitra Prasad
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Andreas Schulze
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Komudi Siriwardena
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rebecca Sparkes
- Departments of Medical Genetics and Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kathy Speechley
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sylvia Stockler
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mari Teitelbaum
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yannis Trakadis
- Department of Specialized Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Clara van Karnebeek
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jagdeep S Walia
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- Faculty of Medicine Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth K Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hen M. Mothers' and teachers' experience of school re‐entry after a child's prolonged absence due to severe illness. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pits.22666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Meirav Hen
- Department of Psychology Tel‐Hai Academic College Qiryat Shemona Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sisk BA, Schulz G, Kaye EC, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Conflicting goals and obligations: Tensions affecting communication in pediatric oncology. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:56-61. [PMID: 33992486 PMCID: PMC8978564 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the tensions experienced by clinicians and psychosocial professionals that affect communication in pediatric oncology. METHODS Ten focus groups with nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals at 2 US institutions. We analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, assessing tensions experienced when communicating with parents. RESULTS We identified 5 themes of tensions, defined as challenges experienced when clinicians and psychosocial professionals are trying to achieve multiple conflicting goals or obligations while communicating: (1) Supporting parental hopes while providing honest opinions and information; (2) disclosing all possible outcomes while avoiding the creation of new worries or uncertainties; (3) building relationships while maintaining personal boundaries; (4) disclosing sensitive information while adhering to professional role and perceived authority; (5) validating parental beliefs or decisions while fulfilling obligation for honesty. Some tensions represented conflicts between different communication goals. Others represented conflicts between a communication goal and another obligation. CONCLUSION Clinicians and psychosocial professionals experience tensions that affect communication with parents in pediatric oncology. Some tensions might be addressed with interventions or education. Others will require further analysis to provide sufficient guidance to clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Unaddressed tensions might lead to poor communication and clinician burnout. Future work should explore solutions to these tensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Ginny Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sisk BA, Harvey K, Friedrich AB, Antes AL, Yaeger LH, Mack JW, DuBois J. Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29405. [PMID: 34662485 PMCID: PMC8875310 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Multiple factors can facilitate or impede the fulfillment of communication functions in pediatric cancer. In this systematic review, we evaluated 109 studies from the preceding 20 years that presented qualitative or quantitative evidence of barriers or facilitators to communication in pediatric cancer. Using a multilevel framework developed in our prior study, we then analyzed and categorized the levels of barriers and facilitators identified in included studies. The vast majority of studies focused on individual-level barriers, rather than team, organization/system, collaborating hospital, community, or policy-level barriers. Future studies should explore the full range of factors that affect communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kieandra Harvey
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B. Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison L. Antes
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren H Yaeger
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wakefield CE, Sansom-Daly UM, McGill BC, Hetherington K, Ellis SJ, Robertson EG, Donoghoe MW, McCarthy M, Kelada L, Girgis A, King M, Grootenhuis M, Anazodo A, Patterson P, Lowe C, Dalla-Pozza L, Miles G, Cohn RJ. Providing Psychological Support to Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors: ' Cascade' Intervention Trial Results and Lessons for the Future. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225597. [PMID: 34830752 PMCID: PMC8615912 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We assessed a new group-based cognitive behavior therapy videoconferencing program to support parents of childhood cancer survivors. The trial allocated parents to three groups: Cascade, peer-support, waitlist. Cascade achieved good parent engagement. We successfully delivered Cascade to participants who lived >3200 km apart. Any technical difficulties caused only minor disruptions. Most Cascade parents were satisfied and reported experiencing benefits from the program. However, Cascade did not improve our main outcomes, including parents’ quality of life, depression and anxiety. Cascade parents reported a short-term improvement in their confidence to use the skills they learnt, but this did not translate into actual use. After six months, Cascade parents felt their child survivor had lower psychological health than waitlisted parents. Our findings show that while some parents find Cascade helpful, it may not suit everyone. We used these findings to further improve Cascade and will trial the new version in future. Abstract We conducted a three-armed trial to assess Cascade, a four-module group videoconferencing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors currently aged <18 years. We allocated parents to Cascade, an attention control (peer-support group), or a waitlist. The primary outcome was parents’ health-related quality of life (PedsQL-Family Impact/EQ-5D-5L) six months post-intervention. Parents also reported their anxiety/depression, parenting self-agency, fear of recurrence, health service and psychotropic medication use, engagement in productive activities, confidence to use, and actual use of, CBT skills, and their child’s quality of life. Seventy-six parents opted in; 56 commenced the trial. Cascade achieved good parent engagement and most Cascade parents were satisfied and reported benefits. Some parents expressed concerns about the time burden and the group format. Most outcomes did not differ across trial arms. Cascade parents felt more confident to use more CBT skills than peer-support and waitlisted parents, but this did not lead to more use of CBT. Cascade parents reported lower psychosocial health scores for their child than waitlisted parents. Cascade parents’ health service use, psychotropic medication use, and days engaged in productive activities did not improve, despite some improvements in waitlisted parents. Our trial was difficult to implement, but participants were largely satisfied. Cascade did not improve most outcomes, possibly because many parents were functioning well pre-enrolment. We used these findings to improve Cascade and will trial the new version in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-(2)-9382-3113; Fax: +61-(2)-9382-1789
| | - Ursula M. Sansom-Daly
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Brittany C. McGill
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Sarah J. Ellis
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Eden G. Robertson
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Mark W. Donoghoe
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Maria McCarthy
- Clinical Sciences, Brain and Mind, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 2052, Australia
| | - Lauren Kelada
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Martha Grootenhuis
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Pandora Patterson
- Research, Evaluation and Social Policy Unit, Canteen, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia;
- Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Cherie Lowe
- Queensland Children’s Cancer Centre, Queensland Children’s Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
| | - Luciano Dalla-Pozza
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Gordon Miles
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
| | - Richard J. Cohn
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rost M, Mihailov E. In the name of the family? Against parents' refusal to disclose prognostic information to children. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 24:421-432. [PMID: 33847853 PMCID: PMC8349339 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-021-10017-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Parents frequently attempt to shield their children from distressing prognostic information. Pediatric oncology providers sometimes follow parental request for non-disclosure of prognostic information to children, invoking what we call the stability of the family argument. They believe that if they inform the child about terminal prognosis despite parental wishes, cohesion and family structure will be severely hampered. In this paper, we argue against parental request for non-disclosure. Firstly, we present the stability of the family argument in more detail. We, then, set out the (conceptual, legal, systemic) entitativity of the family and the kind of value the stability of the family argument assumes, before we set on to critically evaluate the argument. Our analysis shows that disclosure of prognostic information to children does not necessarily destabilize the family to a greater extent than non-disclosure. In fact, a systemic perspective suggests that mediated disclosure is more likely to result in a (long-term) stability of the family than non-disclosure. It is in the interest of the family to resist the initial aversive reaction to delivering bad news. In the final part, we draw a set of recommendations on how to facilitate decision-making in face of parental request for non-disclosure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Rost
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Emilian Mihailov
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Centre in Applied Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sisk BA, Keenan MA, Blazin LJ, Kaye E, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. "Don't be afraid to speak up": Communication advice from parents and clinicians of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29052. [PMID: 33861026 PMCID: PMC8286806 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents and clinicians of children with cancer can provide advice to improve communication that reflects lessons learned through experience. We aimed to identify categories of communication advice offered to parents of children with cancer from clinicians and other parents. PROCEDURE (1) Semi-structured interviews with 80 parents of children with cancer at three sites; (2) single-item, open-ended survey administered following 10 focus groups with 58 pediatric oncology clinicians at two sites. We asked participants for communication advice to parents, and analyzed responses using semantic content analysis. RESULTS Parents provided five categories of communication advice to other parents. Advocacy involved asking questions, communicating concerns, and speaking up for the child. Support involved pursuing self-care, seeking and accepting help, and identifying supportive communities. Managing information involved taking and organizing notes, remaining open to difficult truths, and avoiding inaccurate information. Partnership involved establishing open lines of communication with clinicians, making the family's values and priorities known, and trusting the clinical team. Engaging and supporting the child involved, understanding and incorporating the child's preferences and values, and creating a loving environment. Clinicians' advice addressed similar categories, although only one clinician described engaging and supporting the child. Furthermore, parental advice expanded beyond interactions with the clinical team, whereas clinician advice focused more on the role of clinicians. CONCLUSIONS Parents and clinicians of children with cancer provided five categories of communication advice. With these data, clinicians, health care organizations, support groups, and patient advocates could offer experience-informed advice to parents who are seeking information and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Megan A Keenan
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Lindsay J Blazin
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Erica Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Childhood Cancer Centre Is Coming Home: Experiences of Hospital-Based Home Care. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18126241. [PMID: 34207704 PMCID: PMC8296051 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Today, there is a shift towards care being given closer to the patient, with more children receiving care in their homes. Care at home has proven to be a viable alternative to hospital care, as shown by a project for hospital-based home care conducted in West Sweden. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer and parents experienced receiving care at home. After purposive sampling, six children with cancer aged 6–16 and eight parents participated. Semistructured interviews were performed, and the data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Four main categories emerged: save time and energy in the family; maintain everyday life; feel trust in the healthcare professionals; mixed feelings about getting treatment at home. This hospital-based home care project created good conditions for both children with cancer and their parents to feel secure. In addition, home care can be very child-centric, whereby the caregivers involve the children by taking their thoughts and utterances into account.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ringnér A, Olsson C, Eriksson E, From I, Björk M. A moment just for me - parents' experiences of an intervention for person-centred information in paediatric oncology. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 51:101923. [PMID: 33618229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Information can help parents of children with cancer by reducing uncertainty and giving them a sense of control in a chaotic situation. Although providing information to parents is a core activity of paediatric oncology nursing, few studies focus on interventions for informing parents. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate parents' experiences after participating in a person-centred information intervention for parents of children with cancer. METHOD This study is part of a process evaluation of a person-centred informational intervention in paediatric oncology for patients' parents. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 13 parents who had taken part in the intervention were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS An opening for healing emerged as the overarching theme, consisting of three categories. Gaining a deeper understanding of the entire situation describes how parents benefitted from processing current topics and moving forward by learning. Caring reflections in a safe space describes how parents appreciated having a moment just for themselves and feeling better by venting their feelings. Meeting a competent and compassionate nurse describes how parents experienced trust and being listened to. CONCLUSION Having individual information meetings integrated as a primary nursing responsibility, mediated by competent and compassionate nurses also responsible for the care of the child, could enhance person-centred care and individualise parental education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Ringnér
- Umeå University, Department of Nursing, Umeå, Sweden; Umeå University Hospital, Clinical Department of Paediatrics, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Cecilia Olsson
- Karlstad University, Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Emma Eriksson
- Umeå University, Department of Nursing, Umeå, Sweden; Umeå University Hospital, Clinical Department of Paediatrics, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ida From
- Umeå University, Department of Nursing, Umeå, Sweden; Umeå University Hospital, Clinical Department of Paediatrics, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Maria Björk
- Jönköping University, CHILD Research Group, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sisk BA, Friedrich AB, Kaye EC, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Multilevel barriers to communication in pediatric oncology: Clinicians' perspectives. Cancer 2021; 127:2130-2138. [PMID: 33598930 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication serves several functions in pediatric oncology, but communication deficiencies persist. Little is known about the broad spectrum of barriers contributing to these deficiencies. Identifying these barriers will support new strategies to improve communication. METHODS The authors performed 10 focus groups on perceived communication barriers with nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals across 2 academic institutions. They analyzed transcripts by adapting a multilevel framework from organizational psychology. RESULTS The authors identified 6 levels of barriers to communication from the clinicians' perspectives: individual, team, organization, collaborating hospital, community, and policy. Individual barriers were subdivided into clinician characteristics, family characteristics, or characteristics of the clinician-family interaction. Within each level and sublevel, several manifestations of barriers were identified. Some barriers, such as a lack of comfort with difficult topics (individual), cultural differences (individual), a lack of a shared team mental model (team), and time pressure (organization), manifested similarly across professions and institutions. Other barriers, such as a need for boundaries (individual), intimidation or embarrassment of family (individual), unclear roles and authority (team), and excessive logistical requirements (policy), manifested differently across professions. With the exception of collaborating hospitals, participants from all professions identified barriers from each level. Physicians did not discuss collaborating hospital barriers. CONCLUSIONS Nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals experience communication barriers at multiple levels, which range from individual- to policy-level barriers. Yet their unique clinical roles and duties can lead to different manifestations of some barriers. This multilevel framework might help clinicians and researchers to identify targets for interventions to improve communication experiences for families in pediatric oncology. LAY SUMMARY Clinicians and families experience many barriers to communication in pediatric oncology. The authors performed 10 focus groups with 59 clinicians who cared for children with cancer. In these focus groups, barriers to effective communication were discussed. In this article, the authors report on an analysis of the responses. Six levels of barriers to communication were found: individual, team, organization, collaborating hospital, community, and policy. With an understanding of these barriers, interventions can be developed to target these barriers in hopes of improving communication for parents and patients in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kongwattanakul S, Othaganont P, Chii Tzeng W. The Lived Experiences of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer during Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy Care Process. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020; 21:3669-3675. [PMID: 33369467 PMCID: PMC8046311 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2020.21.12.3669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: An exploration of concurrent chemoradiation therapy care process from the perspective of patients with head and neck cancer can provide an insight to their lived experience and the difficulties they encounter in daily life towards a deeper understanding of this phenomenon to shape nursing service delivery. The aims of this study were to explore the lived experiences of patients with head and neck cancer while receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Methods: Data were generated from individual in-depth interviews with fifteen head and neck cancer patients, according to the semi-structured interview guidelines, at the out-patient radiation oncology department, Chulabhorn Cancer Center, Bangkok, Thailand. Results: By using Graneheim and Lundman’s content analysis, three categories from the data analysis of patients with head and neck cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy were isolated: 1) overwhelming information, 2) unpleasant symptom cluster, and 3) strategy for adherence to treatment regimen. Conclusion: The findings help to provide a better understanding of the lived experiences of patients with head and neck cancer during concurrent chemoradiation therapy, in terms of their suffering from various unpleasant side effects and how these impact their life along the treatment journey. This perspective on the care process in these patients enhances the development of a nursing care model based on patient-centered care toward positive patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wen Chii Tzeng
- School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center Neihu District, Taip, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brown EA, Egberts M, Wardhani R, De Young A, Kimble R, Griffin B, Storey K, Kenardy J. Parent and Clinician Communication During Paediatric Burn Wound Care: A Qualitative Study. J Pediatr Nurs 2020; 55:147-154. [PMID: 32950822 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To thematically describe parent-clinician communication during a child's first burn dressing change following emergency department presentation. DESIGN AND METHODS An observational study of parent-clinician communication during the first burn dressing change at a tertiary children's hospital. Verbal communication between those present at the dressing change for 87 families, was audio recorded. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analysed within NVivo11 qualitative data analysis software using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS Three themes, underpinned by parent-clinician rapport-building, were identified. Firstly, knowledge sharing was demonstrated: Clinicians frequently informed the parent about the state of the child's wound, what the procedure will involve, and need for future treatment. Comparatively, parents informed the clinician about their child's temperament and coping since the accident. Secondly, child procedural distress management was discussed: Clinicians and parents had expectations about the likelihood of procedural distress, which was also related to communication about how to prevent and interpret procedural distress (i.e., pain/fear). Finally, parents communicated to clinicians about their own distress, worry and uncertainty, from the accident and wound care. Parents also communicated guilt and blame in relation to injury responsibility. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a description of parent-clinician communication during paediatric burn wound care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The results can assist healthcare professionals to be prepared for a range of conversations with parents during potentially distressing paediatric medical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin A Brown
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
| | - Marthe Egberts
- Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Beverwijk, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Rachmania Wardhani
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
| | - Alexandra De Young
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
| | - Roy Kimble
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia; Pegg Leditschke Children's Burns Centre, Queensland Children's Hospital, Queensland Health, QLD, Australia.
| | | | - Kristen Storey
- Pegg Leditschke Children's Burns Centre, Queensland Children's Hospital, Queensland Health, QLD, Australia.
| | - Justin Kenardy
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|