1
|
Doan TT, Hutton DW, Wright DR, Prosser LA. Estimating Transition Probabilities for Modeling Major Depression in Adolescents by Sex and Race or Ethnicity Combinations in the USA. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2024; 22:375-390. [PMID: 38253972 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00872-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE About one-fifth of US adolescents experienced major depressive symptoms, but few studies have examined longitudinal trends of adolescents developing depression or recovering by demographic factors. We estimated new transition probability inputs, and then used them in a simulation model to project the epidemiologic burden and trajectory of depression of diverse adolescents by sex and race or ethnicity combinations. METHODS Transition probabilities were first derived using parametric survival analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and then calibrated to cross-sectional data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We developed a cohort state-transition model to simulate age-specific depression outcomes of US adolescents. A hypothetical adolescent cohort was modeled from 12-22 years with annual transitions. Model outcomes included proportions of youth experiencing depression, recovery, or depression-free cases and were reported for a US adolescent population by sex, race or ethnicity, and sex and race or ethnicity combinations. RESULTS At 22 years of age, approximately 16% of adolescents had depression, 12% were in recovery, and 72% had never developed depression. Depression prevalence peaked around 16-17 years-old. Adolescents of multiracial or other race or ethnicity, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish descent were more likely to experience depression than other racial or ethnic groups. Depression trajectories generated by the model matched well with historical observational studies by sex and race or ethnicity, except for individuals from American Indian or Alaska Native and multiracial or other race or ethnicity backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS This study validated new transition probabilities for future use in decision models evaluating adolescent depression policies or interventions. Different sets of transition parameters by demographic factors (sex and race or ethnicity combinations) were generated to support future health equity research, including distributional cost-effectiveness analysis. Further data disaggregated with respect to race, ethnicity, religion, income, geography, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability would be helpful to project accurate estimates for historically minoritized communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tran T Doan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3414 Fifth Avenue, 1st Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-3205, USA.
| | - David W Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Davene R Wright
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henry E, Al-Janabi H, Brouwer W, Cullinan J, Engel L, Griffin S, Hulme C, Kingkaew P, Lloyd A, Payakachat N, Pennington B, Peña-Longobardo LM, Prosser LA, Shah K, Ungar WJ, Wilkinson T, Wittenberg E. Recommendations for Emerging Good Practice and Future Research in Relation to Family and Caregiver Health Spillovers in Health Economic Evaluations: A Report of the SHEER Task Force. Pharmacoeconomics 2024; 42:343-362. [PMID: 38041698 PMCID: PMC10861630 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01321-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omission of family and caregiver health spillovers from the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions remains common practice. When reported, a high degree of methodological inconsistency in incorporating spillovers has been observed. AIM To promote emerging good practice, this paper from the Spillovers in Health Economic Evaluation and Research (SHEER) task force aims to provide guidance on the incorporation of family and caregiver health spillovers in cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. SHEER also seeks to inform the basis for a spillover research agenda and future practice. METHODS A modified nominal group technique was used to reach consensus on a set of recommendations, representative of the views of participating subject-matter experts. Through the structured discussions of the group, as well as on the basis of evidence identified during a review process, recommendations were proposed and voted upon, with voting being held over two rounds. RESULTS This report describes 11 consensus recommendations for emerging good practice. SHEER advocates for the incorporation of health spillovers into analyses conducted from a healthcare/health payer perspective, and more generally inclusive perspectives such as a societal perspective. Where possible, spillovers related to displaced/foregone activities should be considered, as should the distributional consequences of inclusion. Time horizons ought to be sufficient to capture all relevant impacts. Currently, the collection of primary spillover data is preferred and clear justification should be provided when using secondary data. Transparency and consistency when reporting on the incorporation of health spillovers are crucial. In addition, given that the evidence base relating to health spillovers remains limited and requires much development, 12 avenues for future research are proposed. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of health spillovers in economic evaluations has been called for by researchers and policymakers alike. Accordingly, it is hoped that the consensus recommendations of SHEER will motivate more widespread incorporation of health spillovers into analyses. The developing nature of spillover research necessitates that this guidance be viewed as an initial roadmap, rather than a strict checklist. Moreover, there is a need for balance between consistency in approach, where valuable in a decision making context, and variation in application, to reflect differing decision maker perspectives and to support innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Henry
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John Cullinan
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Pritaporn Kingkaew
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Nalin Payakachat
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Koonal Shah
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Wilkinson
- Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doan TT, DeJonckheere M, Wright DR, Hutton DW, Prosser LA. Preferences and experiences of pediatricians on implementing national guidelines on universal routine screening of adolescents for major depressive disorder: A qualitative study. Compr Psychiatry 2023; 127:152412. [PMID: 37717343 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the preferences of pediatricians for key factors around the implementation of universal routine screening guidelines for major depressive disorder in adolescent patients in a primary care setting. METHOD Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with U.S. pediatricians. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and snowball sampling. Qualitive data were summarized using thematic analysis to identify themes relevant to preferences around implementing screening strategies for adolescent patients. Recruitment ended upon reaching thematic saturation when no new themes were revealed. RESULTS Of the 14 participants, 11 identified as female, 3 male, 10 white, and 4 Asian. Top themes among pediatrician participants were around the screening modality (14/14 participants), screening validity (14/14), time barriers (14/14), and confidentiality barriers (12/14). Less frequently mentioned themes by pediatricians were workplace coordination and logistics (7/14), alternative starting ages for screening (7/14), more frequent screenings than annual screenings (3/14), and additional clinical training regarding depression diagnosis and treatment (2/14). LIMITATIONS Pool of interviewed participants was limited by diversity in terms of geography, race/ethnicity, or practice settings. CONCLUSIONS To promote the uptake of universal routine screening of adolescent major depression, pediatricians expressed it was important to address key implementation factors regarding the screening modality, screening validity, time constraints, and confidential care concerns in a primary care delivery context. Findings could be used to inform the development of implementation strategies to facilitate depression screening in primary care. Future research is needed to quantitively assess decisions and tradeoffs that pediatricians make when implementing universal screening to support adolescent mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tran T Doan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Melissa DeJonckheere
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Davene R Wright
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dunlap LJ, Kuklinski MR, Cowell A, McCollister KE, Bowser DM, Campbell M, Fernandes CSF, Kemburu P, Livingston BJ, Prosser LA, Rao V, Smart R, Yilmazer T. Economic Evaluation Design within the HEAL Prevention Cooperative. Prev Sci 2023; 24:50-60. [PMID: 35947282 PMCID: PMC9364296 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01400-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
The rapid rise in opioid misuse, disorder, and opioid-involved deaths among older adolescents and young adults is an urgent public health problem. Prevention is a vital part of the nation's response to the opioid crisis, yet preventive interventions for those at risk for opioid misuse and opioid use disorder are scarce. In 2019, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched the Preventing Opioid Use Disorder in Older Adolescents and Young Adults cooperative as part of its broader Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative ( https://heal.nih.gov/ ). The HEAL Prevention Cooperative (HPC) includes ten research projects funded with the goal of developing effective prevention interventions across various settings (e.g., community, health care, juvenile justice, school) for older adolescent and young adults at risk for opioid misuse and opioid use disorder (OUD). An important component of the HPC is the inclusion of an economic evaluation by nine of these research projects that will provide information on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of these interventions. The HPC economic evaluation is integrated into each research project's overall design with start-up costs and ongoing delivery costs collected prospectively using an activity-based costing approach. The primary objectives of the economic evaluation are to estimate the intervention implementation costs to providers, estimate the cost-effectiveness of each intervention for reducing opioid misuse initiation and escalation among youth, and use simulation modeling to estimate the budget impact of broader implementation of the interventions within the various settings over multiple years. The HPC offers an extraordinary opportunity to generate economic evidence for substance use prevention programming, providing policy makers and providers with critical information on the investments needed to start-up prevention interventions, as well as the cost-effectiveness of these interventions relative to alternatives. These data will help demonstrate the valuable role that prevention can play in combating the opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Dunlap
- RTI International, E. Cornwallis Rd, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
| | | | - Alexander Cowell
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Government of Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn E McCollister
- Soffer Clinical Research Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Diana M Bowser
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Pranav Kemburu
- RTI International, E. Cornwallis Rd, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | | | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Vinod Rao
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Tansel Yilmazer
- Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ream MA, Lam WK, Grosse SD, Ojodu J, Jones E, Prosser LA, Rose AM, Comeau AM, Tanksley S, Powell CM, Kemper AR. Evidence and Recommendation for Guanidinoacetate Methyltransferase Deficiency Newborn Screening. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023062100. [PMID: 37465909 PMCID: PMC10527896 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-062100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disorder of creatine biosynthesis due to pathogenic variants in the GAMT gene that lead to cerebral creatine deficiency and neurotoxic levels of guanidinoacetate. Untreated, GAMT deficiency is associated with hypotonia, significant intellectual disability, limited speech development, recurrent seizures, behavior problems, and involuntary movements. The birth prevalence of GAMT deficiency is likely between 0.5 and 2 per million live births. On the basis of small case series and sibling data, presymptomatic treatment with oral supplements of creatine, ornithine, and sodium benzoate, and a protein-restricted diet to reduce arginine intake, appear to substantially improve health and developmental outcomes. Without newborn screening, diagnosis typically happens after the development of significant impairment, when treatment has limited utility. GAMT deficiency newborn screening can be incorporated into the tandem-mass spectrometry screening that is already routinely used for newborn screening, with about 1 per 100 000 newborns screening positive. After a positive screen, diagnosis is established by finding an elevated guanidinoacetate concentration and low creatine concentration in the blood. Although GAMT deficiency is significantly more rare than other conditions included in newborn screening, the feasibility of screening, the low number of positive results, the relative ease of diagnosis, and the expected benefit of presymptomatic dietary therapy led to a recommendation from the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children to the Secretary of Health and Human Services that GAMT deficiency be added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. This recommendation was accepted in January 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margie A. Ream
- Division of Child Neurology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wendy K.K. Lam
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott D. Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jelili Ojodu
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth Jones
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Angela M. Rose
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anne Marie Comeau
- New England Newborn Screening Program, Department of Pediatrics, UMass Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Susan Tanksley
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Laboratory Services Section, Austin, Texas
| | - Cynthia M. Powell
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alex R. Kemper
- Division of Primary Care Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlton EF, Moniz MH, Scott JW, Prescott HC, Prosser LA, Becker NV. Preexisting Financial Hardship Among Caregivers of Hospitalized Children. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:732-733. [PMID: 37126328 PMCID: PMC10152370 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examines preexisting financial hardship among caregivers of hospitalized children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F. Carlton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Michelle H. Moniz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - John W. Scott
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Nora V. Becker
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim DeLuca E, Gebremariam A, Rose A, Biggerstaff M, Meltzer MI, Prosser LA. Cost-effectiveness of routine annual influenza vaccination by age and risk status. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00495-4. [PMID: 37291022 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The epidemiology of circulating seasonal influenza strains changed following the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1). A universal influenza vaccination recommendation has been implemented and new vaccine types have become available post-2009. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine annual influenza vaccination in the context of this new evidence. METHODS A state transition simulation model was constructed to estimate the health and economic outcomes of influenza vaccination compared to no vaccination for hypothetical US cohorts stratified by age and risk status. Model input parameters were derived from multiple sources, including post-2009 vaccine effectiveness data from the US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network. The analysis used societal and healthcare sector perspectives and a one-year time horizon, except permanent outcomes were also included. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in dollars per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS Compared to no vaccination, vaccination yielded ICERs lower than $95,000/QALY for all age and risk groups, except for non-high-risk adults 18-49 years ($194,000/QALY). Vaccination was cost-saving for adults ≥50 years at higher risk for influenza-related complications. Results were most sensitive to changes in the probability of influenza illness. Performing the analysis from the healthcare sector perspective, excluding vaccination time costs, delivering vaccinations in lower-cost settings, and including productivity losses improved the cost-effectiveness of vaccination. Sensitivity analysis revealed that vaccination remains below $100,000/QALY for older persons ≥65 years at vaccine effectiveness estimates as low as 4 %. CONCLUSIONS Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination varied by age and risk status and was less than $95,000/QALY for all subgroups, except for non-high-risk working-age adults. Results were sensitive to the probability of influenza illness and vaccination was more favorable under certain scenarios. Vaccination for higher risk subgroups resulted in ICERs below $100,000/QALY even at low levels of vaccine effectiveness or circulating virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Kim DeLuca
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Acham Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Angela Rose
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Matthew Biggerstaff
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Martin I Meltzer
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cadham CJ, Prosser LA. Eliciting Trade-Offs Between Equity and Efficiency: A Methodological Scoping Review. Value Health 2023; 26:943-952. [PMID: 36805575 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify differences in the approaches and results of studies that elicit equity-efficiency trade-offs that can inform equity-informative cost-effectiveness analysis for healthcare resource allocation. METHODS We searched Ovid (Medline), EconLit, and Scopus prior to June 25, 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed or (2) gray literature; (3) published in English; (4) survey-based; (5) parameterized a social welfare function to quantify inequality aversion or (6) elicited a trade-off in equity and efficiency characteristics of health interventions. Exclusion criteria were: (1) studies that did not conduct a trade-off or (2) theoretical studies. We abstracted details on study methods, results, and limitations. Studies were grouped by following approach: (1) social welfare function or (2) preference ranking and distributional weighting. We described findings separately for each approach category. RESULTS Seventy-seven papers were included, 28 parameterized social welfare functions and 49 were classified as preference ranking and distributional weighting. Study methods were heterogeneous. Studies were conducted across 29 countries. Sample sizes and composition, survey methods and question framing varied. Preferences for equity were mixed. Across both approach categories: 39 studies were classified as clear evidence of inequality aversion; 33 found mixed evidence; and 4 had no evidence of aversion. Evidence of between and within-study heterogeneity was found. Preferences for equity may differ by gender, profession, political ideology, income, and education. CONCLUSIONS Substantial variability in study methods limit the direct comparability of findings and their use in equity-informed cost-effectiveness analysis. Future researches using representative samples that explore within and between country heterogeneity is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Cadham
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim DD, Do LA, Synnott PG, Lavelle TA, Prosser LA, Wong JB, Neumann PJ. Developing Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation Tool. Value Health 2023:S1098-3015(23)02561-5. [PMID: 37068557 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because existing publication guidelines and checklists have limitations when used to assess the quality of cost-effectiveness analysis, we developed a novel quality assessment tool for cost-effectiveness analyses, differentiating methods and reporting quality and incorporating the relative importance of different quality attributes. METHODS We defined 15 quality domains from a scoping review and identified 72 methods and reporting quality attributes (36 each). After designing a best-worst scaling survey, we fielded an online survey to researchers and practitioners to estimate the relative importance of the attributes in February 2021. We analyzed the survey data using a sequential conditional logit model. The final tool included 48 quality attributes deemed most important for assessing methods and reporting quality (24 each), accompanied by a free and web-based scoring system. RESULTS A total of 524 participants completed the methodology section, and 372 completed both methodology and reporting sections. Quality attributes pertaining to the "modeling" and "data inputs and evidence synthesis" domains were deemed most important for methods quality, including "structure of the model reflects the underlying condition and intervention's impact" and "model validation is conducted." Quality attributes pertaining to "modeling" and "Intervention/comparator(s)" domains were considered most important for reporting quality, including "model descriptions are detailed enough for replication." Despite its growing prominence, "equity considerations" were not deemed as important as other quality attributes. CONCLUSIONS The Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation tool allows users to differentiate methods and reporting as well as quantifies the relative importance of quality attributes. Alongside other considerations, it could help assess and improve the quality of cost-effectiveness evidence to inform value-based decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lauren A Do
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia G Synnott
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- The Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John B Wong
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leidner AJ, Anderson TC, Hong K, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Guo A, Pike J, Prosser LA, Dooling KL. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Vaccination With Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Among Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients and Persons With Other Immunocompromising Conditions Aged 19 to 49 Years. Value Health 2023; 26:204-215. [PMID: 36243666 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the use of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) (Shingrix), which protects against herpes zoster (HZ), among immunocompromised adults aged 19 to 49 years, as a contribution to deliberations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. METHODS Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients experience a high incidence of HZ, and the efficacy of RZV in preventing HZ has been studied in clinical trials. The cost-effectiveness model calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that compared vaccination with RZV with a no vaccination strategy among adults aged 19 to 49 years. Costs and outcomes were calculated until age 50 years using the healthcare sector perspective and summarized as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The base case represents HCT recipients, with scenario analyses representing persons with other immunocompromising conditions, including hematologic malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus, and autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Uncertainty was investigated using univariate, multivariate, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Base-case results indicated vaccination with RZV would avert approximately 35% of HZ episodes and complications, while saving approximately 11% of net costs. Compared with no vaccination, vaccination of HCT recipients with RZV generated cost-savings (ie, lower costs and improved health) in the base case and in 81% of simulations in the probabilistic analysis. In scenario analyses, vaccination cost US dollar ($) 9500/QALY among patients with hematologic malignancies, $79 000/QALY among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus, and $208 000/QALY among persons with selected autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. CONCLUSIONS Generally favorable economic estimates supported recommendations for vaccination of immunocompromised adults with RZV to prevent episodes of HZ and related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Leidner
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Tara C Anderson
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kai Hong
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Angela Guo
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jamison Pike
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kathleen L Dooling
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ream MA, Lam WKK, Grosse SD, Ojodu J, Jones E, Prosser LA, Rosé AM, Comeau AM, Tanksley S, Powell CM, Kemper AR. Evidence and recommendation for mucopolysaccharidosis type II newborn screening in the United States. Genet Med 2023; 25:100330. [PMID: 36445366 PMCID: PMC9905270 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), also known as Hunter syndrome, is an X-linked condition caused by pathogenic variants in the iduronate-2-sulfatase gene. The resulting reduced activity of the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase leads to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans that can progressively affect multiple organ systems and impair neurologic development. In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration approved idursulfase for intravenous enzyme replacement therapy for MPS II. After the data suggesting that early treatment is beneficial became available, 2 states, Illinois and Missouri, implemented MPS II newborn screening. Following a recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children in February 2022, in August 2022, the US Secretary of Health and Human Services added MPS II to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, a list of conditions recommended for newborn screening. MPS II was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel after a systematic evidence review reported the accuracy of screening, the benefit of presymptomatic treatment compared with usual case detection, and the feasibility of implementing MPS II newborn screening. This manuscript summarizes the findings of the evidence review that informed the Advisory Committee's decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margie A Ream
- Division of Child Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
| | - Wendy K K Lam
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Scott D Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jelili Ojodu
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Elizabeth Jones
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Angela M Rosé
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anne Marie Comeau
- New England Newborn Screening Program, Department of Pediatrics, UMass Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA
| | - Susan Tanksley
- Laboratory Services Section, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alex R Kemper
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wagner AL, Lu Y, Janusz CB, Pan SW, Glover B, Wu Z, Prosser LA. Preferences for Sexually Transmitted Infection and Cancer Vaccines in the United States and in China. Value Health 2023; 26:261-268. [PMID: 36055920 PMCID: PMC9908821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study assessed preferences for hypothetical vaccines for children in 2 large vaccine markets according to how the vaccine-preventable disease is transmitted via a discrete choice experiment. METHODS Surveys in China (N = 1350) and the United States (N = 1413) were conducted from April to May 2021. The discrete choice experiment included attributes of cost, age at vaccination, transmission mode of the vaccine-preventable disease, and whether the vaccine prevents cancer. Preference utilities were modeled in a Bayesian, multinomial logistic regression model, and respondents were grouped by vaccine preference classification through a latent class analysis. RESULTS Individuals favored vaccines against diseases with transmission modes other than sexual transmission (vaccine for sexually transmitted infection [STI] vs airborne disease, in the United States, odds ratio 0.71; 95% credible interval 0.64-0.78; in China, odds ratio 0.76; 95% credible interval 0.69-0.84). The latent class analysis revealed 6 classes: vaccine rejecters (19% in the United States and 8% in China), careful deciders (18% and 17%), preferring cancer vaccination (20% and 19%), preferring vaccinating children at older ages (10% and 11%), preferring vaccinating older ages, but indifferent about cancer vaccines (23% and 25%), and preferring vaccinating children at younger ages (10% and 19%). Vaccine rejection was higher with age in the United States versus more vaccine rejection among those at the age of 18 to 24 and ≥ 64 years in China. CONCLUSION The public had strong preferences against giving their child an STI vaccine, and the class preferring a cancer vaccine was less accepting of an STI vaccine. Overall, this study points to the need for more education about how some STI vaccines could also prevent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abram L Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Yihan Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Cara B Janusz
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stephen W Pan
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
| | - Brian Glover
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Zhenke Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prosser LA, Wagner AL, Wittenberg E, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Rose AM, Pike J. A Discrete Choice Analysis Comparing COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Children and Adults. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2253582. [PMID: 36716030 PMCID: PMC9887501 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE COVID-19 vaccination rates in the US remain below optimal levels. Patient preferences for different attributes of vaccine products and the vaccination experience can be important in determining vaccine uptake decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess preferences for attributes of adult and pediatric COVID-19 vaccination among US adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An online survey of a national panel of 1040 US adults was conducted in May and June 2021. A discrete choice analysis was used to measure the relative value of each attribute in the decision to choose a COVID-19 vaccination option for adults or children. Six attributes were used to described hypothetical vaccination options: vaccine effectiveness, mild side effects, rare adverse events, number of doses, time required for vaccination, and regulatory approval. Respondents chose between hypothetical vaccination profiles or no vaccination. Additional survey questions asked about vaccination beliefs, COVID-19 illness experience, COVID-19 risk factors, vaccination status, and opinions about the risk of COVID-19. EXPOSURES Respondents chose which vaccine profile they would prefer to receive for themselves (or no vaccination). Respondents then considered an identical set of profiles for a hypothetical child aged 0 to 17 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Relative value of vaccination-related attributes were estimated using Bayesian logit regression. Preference profiles for subgroups were estimated using latent class analyses. RESULTS A total of 1040 adults (610 [59%] female; 379 participants [36%] with an age of 55 years and older years) responded to the survey. When asked about vaccination choices for themselves, participants indicated that vaccine effectiveness (95% vs 60%) was a significant attribute (β, 9.59 [95% CrI, 9.20-10.00] vs β, 0.41 [95% CrI, 0-0.80]). Respondents also preferred fewer rare adverse events (β, 6.35 [95% CrI, 5.74-6.86), fewer mild side effects (β, 5.49; 95% CrI, 5.12-5.87), 1 dose (β, 5.41; 95% CrI, 5.04-5.78), FDA approval (β, 6.01; 95% CrI, 5.64-6.41), and shorter waiting times (β, 5.67; 95% CrI, 4.87-6.48). Results were very similar when framing the question as adult or child vaccination, with slightly stronger preference for fewer rare adverse events for children. Latent class analysis revealed 4 groups of respondents: (1) individuals sensitive to safety and regulatory status, (2) individuals sensitive to convenience, (3) individuals who carefully considered all attributes in making their choices, and (4) individuals who rejected the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this survey study of US adults, the identification of 4 distinct preference groups provides new information to guide communications to support vaccine decision making. In particular, the group that prioritize convenience (less time required for vaccination and fewer doses) may present an opportunity to create actionable strategies to increase vaccination uptake for both adult and pediatric populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jamison Pike
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Janusz CB, Anderson TC, Leidner AJ, Lee GM, Dooling K, Prosser LA. Projected risks and health benefits of vaccination against herpes zoster and related complications in US adults. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2060668. [PMID: 35476029 PMCID: PMC9897652 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2060668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) to prevent against herpes zoster (HZ) and related complications in immunocompetent adults ≥50 y and immunocompromised adults ≥19 y. In 2019, a statistical safety signal for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following RZV was identified using data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). Subsequently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and collaborators undertook additional analyses using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare data to further investigate the potential risk of GBS following RZV. Concurrently, epidemiologic data suggested a potentially elevated risk of GBS following HZ in U.S. adults. Using data from these sources and a published simulation model, this study evaluated the health benefits and risks associated with vaccinating immunocompetent adults ≥50 y with RZV compared to no vaccination. In the base case analysis, RZV vaccination averted 43,000-63,000 cases of HZ, including GBS complications, per million vaccinated per 10-y age cohort compared to 3-6 additional cases of GBS projected following RZV per million vaccinated in the same population. This analysis highlights the projected health benefits of RZV vaccination compared to the relatively low potential risk of GBS following RZV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara B. Janusz
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tara C. Anderson
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andrew J. Leidner
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Grace M. Lee
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen Dooling
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,CONTACT Lisa A. Prosser University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Street, 6A14, Ann Arbor, MI48109
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carlton EF, Gebremariam A, Maddux AB, McNamara N, Barbaro RP, Cornell TT, Iwashyna TJ, Prosser LA, Zimmerman J, Weiss S, Prescott HC. New and Progressive Medical Conditions After Pediatric Sepsis Hospitalization Requiring Critical Care. JAMA Pediatr 2022; 176:e223554. [PMID: 36215045 PMCID: PMC9552050 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Children commonly experience physical, cognitive, or emotional sequelae after sepsis. However, little is known about the development or progression of medical conditions after pediatric sepsis. Objective To quantify the development and progression of 4 common conditions in the 6 months after sepsis and to assess whether they differed after hospitalization for sepsis vs nonsepsis among critically ill children. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of 101 511 children (<19 years) with sepsis or nonsepsis hospitalization used a national administrative claims database (January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018). Data management and analysis were conducted from April 1, 2020, to July 7, 2022. Exposures Intensive care unit hospitalization for sepsis vs all-cause intensive care unit hospitalizations, excluding sepsis. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the development of 4 target conditions (chronic respiratory failure, seizure disorder, supplemental nutritional dependence, and chronic kidney disease) within 6 months of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the progression of the 4 target conditions among children with the condition before hospitalization. Outcomes were identified via diagnostic and procedural codes, durable medical equipment codes, and prescription medications. Differences in the development and the progression of conditions between pediatric patients with sepsis and pediatric patients with nonsepsis who survived intensive care unit hospitalization were assessed using logistic regression with matching weights. Results A total of 5150 survivors of pediatric sepsis and 96 361 survivors of nonsepsis intensive care unit hospitalizations were identified; 2593 (50.3%) were female. The median age was 9.5 years (IQR, 3-15 years) in the sepsis cohort and 7 years (IQR, 2-13 years) in the nonsepsis cohort. Of the 5150 sepsis survivors, 670 (13.0%) developed a new target condition, and 385 of 1834 (21.0%) with a preexisting target condition had disease progression. A total of 998 of the 5150 survivors (19.4%) had development and/or progression of at least 1 condition. New conditions were more common among sepsis vs nonsepsis hospitalizations (new chronic respiratory failure: 4.6% vs 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.54 [95% CI, 2.19-2.94]; new supplemental nutritional dependence: 7.9% vs 2.7%; OR, 3.17 [95% CI, 2.80-3.59]; and new chronic kidney disease: 1.1% vs 0.6%; OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.25-2.19]). New seizure disorder was less common (4.6% vs 6.0%; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]). Progressive supplemental nutritional dependence was more common (1.5% vs 0.5%; OR, 2.95 [95% CI, 1.60-5.42]), progressive epilepsy was less common (33.7% vs 40.6%; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.86]), and progressive respiratory failure (4.4% vs 3.3%; OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.89-2.04]) and progressive chronic kidney disease (7.9% vs 9.2%; OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.18-3.91]) were similar among survivors of sepsis vs nonsepsis admitted to an intensive care unit. Conclusions and Relevance In this national cohort of critically ill children who survived sepsis, 1 in 5 developed or had progression of a condition of interest after sepsis hospitalization, suggesting survivors of pediatric sepsis may benefit from structured follow-up to identify and treat new or worsening medical comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F. Carlton
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Acham Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Aline B. Maddux
- Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
| | - Nancy McNamara
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ryan P. Barbaro
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Timothy T. Cornell
- Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jerry Zimmerman
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Scott Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Omari A, Reeves SL, Prosser LA, Creary MS, Ahmad A, Chua KP. Usability of NewSTEPs Data for Assessing the Characteristics of Infants with Newborn Screening Disorders. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8030042. [PMID: 35892472 PMCID: PMC9326755 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8030042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Most state newborn screening programs in the U.S. currently contribute case data to the Newborn Screening Technical Assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs). To assess the usability of these data for research, we examined the completeness of key variables, particularly race and ethnicity. Data included 24,129 cases of 34 newborn screening disorders from 45 states available in NewSTEPs as of 31 August 2020. Birth years of cases ranged between 2006 and 2020. Rates of missing data for sex, gestational age, birth weight, and race/ethnicity were 3.8%, 31.7%, 7.0%, and 39.7%, respectively. After excluding 21 states for which ≥50% of cases had missing data on race and/or ethnicity, 16,010 cases from 24 states remained. The disorders with the highest proportions in which cases were recorded as Hispanic ethnicity/any race were methylmalonic acidemia (48.7%) and maple syrup urine disease (45.7%). Analyses indicated that sex and birth weight data in NewSTEPs are reasonably complete, but missing data are common for gestational age and race/ethnicity. Despite this, our analyses revealed several novel associations between race/ethnicity and newborn screening disorders, such as the high burden of maple syrup urine disease among Hispanic patients. This demonstrates the potential usefulness of NewSTEPs for research if investments in higher-quality data are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amel Omari
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Sarah L. Reeves
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.L.R.); (L.A.P.)
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.L.R.); (L.A.P.)
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Melissa S. Creary
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Ayesha Ahmad
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetics, Metabolism and Genomic Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Kao-Ping Chua
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.L.R.); (L.A.P.)
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-734-615-8169
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chow AJ, Iverson R, Lamoureux M, Tingley K, Jordan I, Pallone N, Smith M, Al-Baldawi Z, Chakraborty P, Brehaut J, Chan A, Cohen E, Dyack S, Gillis LJ, Goobie S, Graham ID, Greenberg CR, Grimshaw JM, Hayeems RZ, Jain-Ghai S, Jolly A, Khangura S, MacKenzie JJ, Major N, Mitchell JJ, Nicholls SG, Pender A, Potter M, Prasad C, Prosser LA, Schulze A, Siriwardena K, Sparkes R, Speechley K, Stockler S, Taljaard M, Teitelbaum M, Trakadis Y, van Karnebeek C, Walia JS, Wilson BJ, Wilson K, Potter BK. Families' healthcare experiences for children with inherited metabolic diseases: protocol for a mixed methods cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055664. [PMID: 35193919 PMCID: PMC8867352 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) often have complex and intensive healthcare needs and their families face challenges in receiving high-quality, family centred health services. Improvement in care requires complex interventions involving multiple components and stakeholders, customised to specific care contexts. This study aims to comprehensively understand the healthcare experiences of children with IMDs and their families across Canada. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-stage explanatory sequential mixed methods design will be used. Stage 1: quantitative data on healthcare networks and encounter experiences will be collected from 100 parent/guardians through a care map, 2 baseline questionnaires and 17 weekly diaries over 5-7 months. Care networks will be analysed using social network analysis. Relationships between demographic or clinical variables and ratings of healthcare experiences across a range of family centred care dimensions will be analysed using generalised linear regression. Other quantitative data related to family experiences and healthcare experiences will be summarised descriptively. Ongoing analysis of quantitative data and purposive, maximum variation sampling will inform sample selection for stage 2: a subset of stage 1 participants will participate in one-on-one videoconference interviews to elaborate on the quantitative data regarding care networks and healthcare experiences. Interview data will be analysed thematically. Qualitative and quantitative data will be merged during analysis to arrive at an enhanced understanding of care experiences. Quantitative and qualitative data will be combined and presented narratively using a weaving approach (jointly on a theme-by-theme basis) and visually in a side-by-side joint display. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol and procedures were approved by the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario's Research Ethics Board, the University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board and the research ethics boards of each participating study centre. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea J Chow
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Iverson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kylie Tingley
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nicole Pallone
- Patient Partner, Canadian PKU & Allied Disorders Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Smith
- Patient Partner, Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zobaida Al-Baldawi
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pranesh Chakraborty
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alicia Chan
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Dyack
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lisa Jane Gillis
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, USA
| | - Sharan Goobie
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl R Greenberg
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shailly Jain-Ghai
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ann Jolly
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Contagion Consulting Group, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Khangura
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer J MacKenzie
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathalie Major
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - John J Mitchell
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stuart G Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Pender
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Murray Potter
- Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chitra Prasad
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Andreas Schulze
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Komudi Siriwardena
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rebecca Sparkes
- Departments of Medical Genetics and Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kathy Speechley
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sylvia Stockler
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mari Teitelbaum
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yannis Trakadis
- Department of Specialized Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Clara van Karnebeek
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jagdeep S Walia
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- Faculty of Medicine Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth K Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Avanceña AL, Prosser LA. Innovations in cost-effectiveness analysis that advance equity can expand its use in health policy. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2021-008140. [PMID: 35173023 PMCID: PMC8852660 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anton L.V. Avanceña
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Crossnohere NL, Fischer R, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Bridges JFP. Authors' Response to Comment on "Assessing the Appropriateness of the EQ-5D for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Patient-Centered Study". Med Decis Making 2021; 42:141-142. [PMID: 34836472 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211062242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Norah L Crossnohere
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ryan Fischer
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | - Lisa A Prosser
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John F P Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bonar EE, Kidwell KM, Bohnert ASB, Bourque CA, Carter PM, Clark SJ, Glantz MD, King CA, Losman ED, McCabe SE, Philyaw-Kotov ML, Prosser LA, Voepel-Lewis T, Zheng K, Walton MA. Optimizing scalable, technology-supported behavioral interventions to prevent opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 108:106523. [PMID: 34352386 PMCID: PMC8453131 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Preventing opioid misuse and opioid use disorder is critical among at-risk adolescents and young adults (AYAs). An Emergency Department (ED) visit provides an opportunity for delivering interventions during a rapidly changing opioid landscape. This paper describes pilot data and the protocol for a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial testing efficacy of early interventions to reduce escalation of opioid (prescription or illicit) misuse among at-risk AYAs. Interventions are delivered using technology by health coaches. AYAs ages 16-30 in the ED screening positive for prescription opioid use (+ ≥ 1 risk factor) or opioid misuse will be stratified by risk severity, sex, and age group. Participants will be randomly assigned to a condition at intake, either a live video health coach-delivered single session or a control condition of an enhanced usual care (EUC) community resource brochure. They are also randomly assigned to one of two post-intake conditions: health coach-delivered portal-like messaging via web portal over 30 days or EUC delivered at 30 days post-intake. Thus, the trial has four groups: health coach-delivered session+portal, health coach-delivered session+EUC, EUC + portal, and EUC + EUC. Outcomes will be measured at 3-, 6-, and 12-months. The primary outcome is opioid misuse based on a modified Alcohol Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Secondary outcomes include other opioid outcomes (e.g., days of opioid misuse, overdose risk behaviors), other substance misuse and consequences, and impaired driving. This study is innovative by testing the efficacy of feasible and scalable technology-enabled interventions to reduce and prevent opioid misuse and opioid use disorder. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov University of Michigan HUM00177625 NCT Registration: NCT04550715.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Bonar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Addiction Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- Veterans Health Administration, Center for Clinical Management Research, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Bldg 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Carrie A Bourque
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Addiction Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Patrick M Carter
- Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Bldg 10-G080, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sarah J Clark
- Susan B Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, 300 N. Ingalls Street, Room 6D04, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Meyer D Glantz
- Division of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 3WFN BG 11601 RM 08C79 MSC 6020, 301 North Stonestreet Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Cheryl A King
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Eve D Losman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd Bldg 10-G080, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sean Esteban McCabe
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences and Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
| | - Meredith L Philyaw-Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Addiction Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, 300 N. Ingalls Street, Room 6D04, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Terri Voepel-Lewis
- Department of Anesthesiology, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences and Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA
| | - Kai Zheng
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Maureen A Walton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Addiction Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd. Building 10, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grosse SD, Kemper AR, Prosser LA. Data Needs for Economic Evaluations of Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Research Framework. Pediatrics 2021; 148:s45-s50. [PMID: 34210848 PMCID: PMC8312553 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050693j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alex R. Kemper
- Division of Primary Care Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan,Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shih SF, Wagner AL, Masters NB, Prosser LA, Lu Y, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Vaccine Hesitancy and Rejection of a Vaccine for the Novel Coronavirus in the United States. Front Immunol 2021; 12:558270. [PMID: 34194418 PMCID: PMC8236639 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.558270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The arrival of the COVID-19 vaccine has been accompanied by increased discussion of vaccine hesitancy. However, it is unclear if there are shared patterns between general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection, or if these are two different concepts. This study characterized rejection of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine, and compared patterns of association between general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection. The survey was conducted online March 20-22, 2020. Participants answered questions on vaccine hesitancy and responded if they would accept the vaccine given different safety and effectiveness profiles. We assessed differences in COVID-19 rejection and general vaccine hesitancy through logistic regressions. Among 713 participants, 33.0% were vaccine hesitant, and 18.4% would reject a COVID-19 vaccine. Acceptance varied by effectiveness profile: 10.2% would reject a 95% effective COVID-19 vaccine, but 32.4% would reject a 50% effective vaccine. Those vaccine hesitant were significantly more likely to reject COVID-19 vaccination [odds ratio (OR): 5.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.39, 9.11]. In multivariable logistic regression models, there were similar patterns for vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection by gender, race/ethnicity, family income, and political affiliation. But the direction of association flipped by urbanicity (P=0.0146, with rural dwellers less likely to be COVID-19 vaccine rejecters but more likely to be vaccine hesitant in general), and age (P=0.0037, with fewer pronounced differences across age for COVID-19 vaccine rejection, but a gradient of stronger vaccine hesitancy in general among younger ages). During the COVID-19 epidemic’s early phase, patterns of vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection were relatively similar. A significant minority would reject a COVID-19 vaccine, especially one with less-than-ideal effectiveness. Preparations for introducing the COVID-19 vaccine should anticipate substantial hesitation and target concerns, especially among younger adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Fang Shih
- Department of Health Administration, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Abram L Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Nina B Masters
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Administration, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.,Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Yihan Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cernat A, Hayeems RZ, Prosser LA, Ungar WJ. Incorporating Cascade Effects of Genetic Testing in Economic Evaluation: A Scoping Review of Methodological Challenges. Children (Basel) 2021; 8:children8050346. [PMID: 33925765 PMCID: PMC8145875 DOI: 10.3390/children8050346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Cascade genetic testing is indicated for family members of individuals testing positive on a genetic test, and is particularly relevant for child health because of their vulnerability and the long-term health and economic implications. Cascade testing has patient- and health system-level implications; however cascade costs and health effects are not routinely considered in economic evaluation. The methodological challenges associated with incorporating cascade effects in economic evaluation require examination. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify published economic evaluations that considered cascade genetic testing. Citation databases were searched for English-language economic evaluations reporting on cascade genetic testing. Nineteen publications were included. In four, genetic testing was used to identify new index patients—cascade effects were also considered; thirteen assessed cascade genetic testing strategies for the identification of at-risk relatives; and two calculated the costs of cascade genetic testing as a secondary objective. Methodological challenges associated with incorporating cascade effects in economic evaluation are related to study design, costing, measurement and valuation of health outcomes, and modeling. As health economic studies may currently be underestimating both the cost and health benefits attributable to genetic technologies through omission of cascade effects, development of methods to address these difficulties is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Cernat
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (A.C.); (R.Z.H.)
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Robin Z. Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (A.C.); (R.Z.H.)
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Wendy J. Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (A.C.); (R.Z.H.)
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Richardson JS, Kemper AR, Grosse SD, Lam WKK, Rose AM, Ahmad A, Gebremariam A, Prosser LA. Health and economic outcomes of newborn screening for infantile-onset Pompe disease. Genet Med 2021; 23:758-766. [PMID: 33281187 PMCID: PMC8035228 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01038-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate health and economic outcomes associated with newborn screening (NBS) for infantile-onset Pompe disease in the United States. METHODS A decision analytic microsimulation model simulated health and economic outcomes of a birth cohort of 4 million children in the United States. Universal NBS and treatment was compared with clinical identification and treatment of infantile-onset Pompe disease. Main outcomes were projected cases identified, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over the life course. RESULTS Universal NBS for Pompe disease and confirmatory testing was estimated to cost an additional $26 million annually. Additional medication costs associated with earlier treatment initiation were $181 million; however, $8 million in medical care costs for other services were averted due to delayed disease progression. Infants with screened and treated infantile-onset Pompe disease experienced an average lifetime increase of 11.66 QALYs compared with clinical detection. The ICER was $379,000/QALY from a societal perspective and $408,000/QALY from the health-care perspective. Results were sensitive to the cost of enzyme replacement therapy. CONCLUSION Newborn screening for Pompe disease results in substantial health gains for individuals with infantile-onset Pompe disease, but with additional costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Richardson
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Alex R Kemper
- Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott D Grosse
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Wendy K K Lam
- Duke Clinical & Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angela M Rose
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ayesha Ahmad
- Division of Pediatric Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Achamyeleh Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crossnohere NL, Fischer R, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Bridges JFP. Assessing the Appropriateness of the EQ-5D for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Patient-Centered Study. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:209-221. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20978390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare degenerative neuromuscular disorder with pediatric onset. Recent approvals in Duchenne have placed attention on the economic evaluation in pricing and reimbursement decisions across a range of rare conditions. We sought to assess the appropriateness of the EQ-5D, a common measure of generic health state utility, for use among patients and caregivers affected by Duchenne. Methods An international, cross-sectional sample of adults with Duchenne and caregivers reported patient health status using self- or proxy-reported EQ-5D-3L. Appropriateness was assessed across 6 domains of concern raised by stakeholders in Duchenne. These concerns were that the EQ-5D/EQ-VAS would not capture meaningful differences in health status, correlate with disease-specific measures, reflect real health status, exhibit face validity, be accurately interpreted, and be low burden. We evaluated these concerns by comparing EQ-5D index score and EQ-VAS scores to other condition-specific functional measures and open- and closed-ended questions. Results In total, 263 participants (74% response) completed the survey, 24% of whom were adult patients. Most participants lived in the United States or United Kingdom (58%). Patient age ranged from 1 to 48 y. EQ-5D index was higher in ambulatory than nonambulatory patients (0.60 v. 0.30, P < 0.001) and was negatively correlated with upper limb impairment ( r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Three-quarters of respondents agreed that EQ-5D measured real health status (74%). Most respondents interpreted EQ-VAS anchors of best and worst imaginable health as full health (61%) and death/near death (58%). Respondents indicated the EQ-5D was easy to understand (86%) and answer (71%). Conclusions Contrary to anecdotal concerns, we found support for the appropriateness of EQ-5D to assess health status in Duchenne. While other measures may be more sensitive to specific outcomes in Duchenne, there may be some value in results using the EQ-5D measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norah L. Crossnohere
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ryan Fischer
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - John F. P. Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Carlton EF, Weiss SL, Prescott HC, Prosser LA. What's the Cost? Measuring the Economic Impact of Pediatric Sepsis. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:761994. [PMID: 34869119 PMCID: PMC8634593 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.761994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Sepsis, life-threatening organ dysfunction secondary to infection, hospitalizes nearly 75,000 children each year in the United States. Most children survive sepsis. However, there is increasing recognition of the longer-term consequences of pediatric sepsis hospitalization on both the child and their family, including medical, psychosocial, and financial impacts. Here, we describe family spillover effects (the impact of illness on caregivers) of pediatric sepsis, why measurement of family spillover effects is important, and the ways in which family spillover effects can be measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F Carlton
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Scott L Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Pediatric Sepsis Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Avanceña ALV, Prosser LA. Examining Equity Effects of Health Interventions in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Review. Value Health 2021; 24:136-143. [PMID: 33431148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to catalogue and describe published applications of equity-informative cost-effectiveness analysis (CEAs). METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline for English-language, peer-reviewed CEAs published on or before August 2019. We included CEAs that evaluated 2 or more alternatives; explicitly mentioned equity as a consideration or decision-making principle; and applied an equity-informative CEA method to analyze or examine at least 1 equity criterion in an applied CEA. We extracted data on selected characteristics and analyzed reporting quality using the CHEERS checklist. RESULTS Fifty-four articles identified through a search and bibliography reviews met the inclusion criteria. All articles were published on or after 2010, with 80% published after 2015. Most studies evaluated primary prevention interventions in disease areas such as cancer, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular disease. Equity impact analysis alone was the most common equity-informative CEA (56%), followed by equity impact analysis with financial protection effects (30%). At least 11 different equity criteria have been used in equity-informative CEAs; socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity were used most frequently. Seventy-eight percent of studies reported finding "greater value" in an intervention after examining its distributional effects. CONCLUSION The number of equity-informative CEAs is increasing, and the wide range of equity criteria, diseases, interventions, settings, and populations represented suggests that broad application of these methods is feasible but will require further refinement. Inclusion of equity into CEAs may shift the value of evaluated interventions and can provide crucial additional information for decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton L V Avanceña
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wagner AL, Huang Z, Ren J, Laffoon M, Ji M, Pinckney LC, Sun X, Prosser LA, Boulton ML, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Vaccine Hesitancy and Concerns About Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness in Shanghai, China. Am J Prev Med 2021; 60:S77-S86. [PMID: 33189502 PMCID: PMC7877188 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rapidly urbanizing communities in middle-income countries could be sources of vaccine hesitancy, and may create hot spots of low vaccination coverage. This study characterizes vaccine hesitancy in Shanghai and identifies disparities in vaccine safety and efficacy concerns by residency status-a marker for recent migration into the city. METHODS Parents of children aged ≤18 years from immunization clinics in Shanghai were enrolled in summer 2019, with the data analyzed during winter 2019-2020. The paper questionnaire used the Parental Attitudes towards Childhood Vaccines scale, which included questions about vaccine safety and efficacy concerns. The primary independent variable was residency-whether an individual was a Shanghai local or a recent migrant (i.e., non-local). Linear regression models assessed the relationship between residency and vaccine safety and efficacy concerns. RESULTS Among 1,021 participants, 65.4% had local residency, and the remainder were urban non-locals (13.1%) or rural non-locals (21.5%). A majority of parents expressed concerns about vaccine side effects (73.8%), vaccine safety (63.9%), and vaccine effectiveness (52.4%). Compared with locals, rural non-locals were more concerned about vaccine side effects (β=0.26, 95% CI=0.07, 0.46), vaccine safety (β=0.42, 95% CI=0.19, 0.65), and vaccine effectiveness (β=0.37, 95% CI=0.16, 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Differences in vaccine hesitancy by residency could lead to geographical and sociodemographic disparities in vaccination coverage and outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION This article is part of a supplement entitled Global Vaccination Equity, which is sponsored by the Global Institute for Vaccine Equity at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abram L Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Zhuoying Huang
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Ren
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
| | - Megan Laffoon
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mengdi Ji
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Leah C Pinckney
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Xiaodong Sun
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew L Boulton
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chua KP, DeJonckheere M, Reeves SL, Tribble AC, Prosser LA. Factors Associated With School Attendance Plans and Support for COVID-19 Risk Mitigation Measures Among Parents and Guardians. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21:684-693. [PMID: 33249257 PMCID: PMC8106633 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine which factors are associated with plans for in-person school attendance during the 2020-2021 school year and with support for 15 school-based COVID-19 risk mitigation measures among parents and guardians. METHODS In June 2020, we conducted an online survey of parents and guardians of public school children in Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio. In a child-level analysis, we used linear regression to assess which demographic factors, health-related concerns, and parent/guardian views were associated with plans for in-person school attendance. In a respondent-level analysis, we used linear regression to assess factors associated with the number of risk mitigation measures supported. RESULTS Among 2202 children in the child-level analysis, in-person school attendance was planned for 71.0%. Such plans were less likely among children of Black respondents (-14.1 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -25.7, -2.6) and Asian respondents (-16.8, 95% CI: -31.3, -2.2), and among children with perceived high-risk health conditions (-9.7, 95% CI: -15.8, -3.6). Among 1,126 respondents in the respondent-level analysis, the mean number of measures supported was 8.0 (SD 4.4). Several factors were associated with support, but the magnitude of associations was generally modest. CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, families of children with health conditions or who are of Black or Asian race/ethnicity may be less likely to opt for in-person learning. For these families, addressing barriers to remote education is critical. As schools plan for the 2020-2021 school year and beyond, they should respond to the desire among parents and guardians to implement substantial numbers of risk mitigation measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kao-Ping Chua
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School (KPC, SLR, LAP), Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health (KPC, LAP), Ann Arbor, Mich.
| | - Melissa DeJonckheere
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sarah L. Reeves
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI,Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Alison C. Tribble
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI,Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eisman AB, Hutton DW, Prosser LA, Smith SN, Kilbourne AM. Cost-effectiveness of the Adaptive Implementation of Effective Programs Trial (ADEPT): approaches to adopting implementation strategies. Implement Sci 2020; 15:109. [PMID: 33317593 PMCID: PMC7734829 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01069-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Theory-based methods to support the uptake of evidence-based practices (EBPs) are critical to improving mental health outcomes. Implementation strategy costs can be substantial, and few have been rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study is to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to identify the most cost-effective approach to deploying implementation strategies to enhance the uptake of Life Goals, a mental health EBP. METHODS We used data from a previously conducted randomized trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of Replicating Effective Programs (REP) combined with external and/or internal facilitation among sites non-responsive to REP. REP is a low-level strategy that includes EBP packaging, training, and technical assistance. External facilitation (EF) involves external expert support, and internal facilitation (IF) augments EF with protected time for internal staff to support EBP implementation. We developed a decision tree to assess 1-year costs and outcomes for four implementation strategies: (1) REP only, (2) REP+EF, (3) REP+EF add IF if needed, (4) REP+EF/IF. The analysis used a 1-year time horizon and assumed a health payer perspective. Our outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The economic outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS Our results indicate that REP+EF add IF is the most cost-effective option with an ICER of $593/QALY. The REP+EF/IF and REP+EF only conditions are dominated (i.e., more expensive and less effective than comparators). One-way sensitivity analyses indicate that results are sensitive to utilities for REP+EF and REP+EF add IF. The PSA results indicate that REP+EF, add IF is the optimal strategy in 30% of iterations at the threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the most cost-effective implementation support begins with a less intensive, less costly strategy initially and increases as needed to enhance EBP uptake. Using this approach, implementation support resources can be judiciously allocated to those clinics that would most benefit. Our results were not robust to changes in the utility measure. Research is needed that incorporates robust and relevant utilities in implementation studies to determine the most cost-effective strategies. This study advances economic evaluation of implementation by assessing costs and utilities across multiple implementation strategy combinations. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02151331 , 05/30/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andria B Eisman
- Community Health, Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies, College of Education, Wayne State University, 2153 Faculty/Administration Building, 656 West Kirby, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| | - David W Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation & Research Center, Dept of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Shawna N Smith
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Amy M Kilbourne
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rozier MD, Singh SR, Jacobson PD, Prosser LA. Priorities for Investing in Community Health Improvement: A Comparison of Decision Makers in Public Health, Nonprofit Hospitals, and Community Nonprofits. J Public Health Manag Pract 2020; 25:322-331. [PMID: 31136505 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT As a result of additional requirements for tax exemption, many nonprofit hospitals have become more actively involved in community health improvement. There is an open question, however, as to how decision makers in hospitals decide which kind of improvement projects should receive priority and how hospital managers' priorities compare with those of decision makers in public health agencies and community-based nonprofits. OBJECTIVE To understand the priorities that guide decision makers in public health, nonprofit hospitals, and community nonprofits when allocating resources to community health projects. DESIGN We conducted an online survey with a discrete choice experiment, asking respondents to choose between different types of community health projects, which varied along several project characteristics. Respondents included managers of community health and community benefit at nonprofit hospitals (n = 225), managers at local public health departments (n = 200), and leaders of community nonprofits (n = 136). Respondents were located in 47 of 50 US states. A conditional logit model was used to estimate how various project characteristics led to greater or lesser support of a given health project. Open-ended questions aided in interpretation of results. RESULTS Respondents from all 3 groups showed strong agreement on community health priorities. Projects were more likely to be selected when they addressed a health issue identified on community health needs assessment, involved cross-sector collaboration, or were supported by evidence. Project characteristics that mattered less included the time needed to measure the project's impact and the project's target population. CONCLUSION Elements often considered central to community health, such as long-term investment and prioritizing vulnerable populations, may not be considered by decision makers as important as other aspects of resource allocation. If we want greater priority for ideas such as health equity and social determinants of health, it will take a concerted effort from practitioners and policy makers to reshape expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Rozier
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Rozier); Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Drs Singh and Jacobson); and Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Dr Prosser)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Huang Z, Wagner AL, Lin M, Sun X, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Boulton ML, Ren J, Prosser LA. Preferences for vaccination program attributes among parents of young infants in Shanghai, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:1905-1910. [PMID: 31977272 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1712937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Compared to many other countries, China offers fewer pediatric vaccines. Future attempts to add mandatory vaccines may run counter to parents' preferences for shot-limiting. The aim of this study was to assess Chinese parents' preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for programmatic attributes of vaccination services. Parents of young infants ≤3 months of age presenting at immunization clinics in Shanghai, China, in 2017 completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) on vaccination program attributes: waiting time at the clinic, number of shots before 7 months, number of injections per visit, cost per visit, and location of the shot. We estimated preference utilities and WTP using logistic regression. In total, 590 completed the DCE. Caregivers expressed greater utility for less waiting time, fewer office visits, lower cost of vaccines, and fewer injections co-administered. Over the course of their child's first 6 months, parents were willing to pay 113 RMB ($17) to avoid an additional 10 minutes of waiting at each appointment (95% confidence interval [CI]: 213, 929), 474 RMB ($70) to avoid an additional office visit (95% CI: 241, 707), and 703 RMB ($104) to avoid an additional injection at each appointment (95% CI: 337, 1068). As China expands its list of publicly funded vaccines, public health officials will have to counter Chinese parents' strong preferences for limiting the total number of office visits and the number of injections administered at each visit, potentially through the use of combination vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoying Huang
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention , Shanghai, China
| | - Abram L Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Muzi Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Xiaodong Sun
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention , Shanghai, China
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Michigan Medicine , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew L Boulton
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Michigan Medicine , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jia Ren
- Department of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention , Shanghai, China
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Michigan Medicine , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McGrady ME, Pai ALH, Prosser LA. Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev 2020; 15:314-332. [PMID: 31937184 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Developing and/or tailoring psychological interventions to align with patient preferences is a critical component of patient-centered care and has the potential to improve patient engagement and treatment outcomes. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a quantitative method of assessing patient preferences that offer numerous strengths (i.e., ability to account for trade-offs), but are not routinely incorporated into health psychology coursework, likely leaving many unaware of the potential benefits of this methodology. To highlight the potential applications of DCEs within health psychology, this systematic review synthesises previous efforts to utilise DCEs to inform the design of patient-centered psychological care, defined as interventions targeting psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety) or behavioural health (e.g., pain management, adherence) concerns. Literature searches were conducted in March 2017 and November 2019 for articles reporting on DCEs using the terms 'discrete choice', 'conjoint', or 'stated preference'. Thirty-nine articles met all inclusion criteria and used DCEs to understand patient preferences regarding psychosocial clinical services (n = 12), lifestyle behaviour change interventions (n = 11), HIV prevention and/or intervention services (n = 10), disease self-management programmes (n = 4), or other interventions (n = 2). Clinical implications as well as limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan E McGrady
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ahna L H Pai
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Grosse SD, Prosser LA, Botkin JR. Avoiding Harm From Hyperbilirubinemia Screening-Reply. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173:1209-1210. [PMID: 31589244 PMCID: PMC7203610 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center,
Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hutton DW, Rose A, Singer DC, Bridges CB, Kim D, Pike J, Prosser LA. Importance of reasons for stocking adult vaccines. Am J Manag Care 2019; 25:e334-e341. [PMID: 31747238 PMCID: PMC9004468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the most important reasons underlying decisions to stock or not stock adult vaccines. STUDY DESIGN US physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and administrators of internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and multispecialty practices who were involved in vaccine stocking decisions (N = 125) completed a best-worst scaling survey online between February and April 2018. METHODS Sixteen potential factors influencing stocking decisions were developed based on key informant interviews and focus groups. Respondents selected factors that were most and least important in vaccine stocking decisions. Relative importance scores for the best-worst scaling factors were calculated. Survey respondents described which vaccines their practice stocks and reasons for not stocking specific vaccines. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the respondent's involvement in vaccine decision making, role in the organization, specialty, and affiliation status, as well as practice characteristics such as practice size, insurance mix, and patient age mix. RESULTS Relative importance scores for stocking vaccines were highest for "cost of purchasing vaccine stock," "expense of maintaining vaccine inventory," and "lack of adequate reimbursement for vaccine acquisition and administration." Most respondents (97%) stocked influenza vaccines, but stocking rates of other vaccines varied from 39% (meningococcal B) to 83% (tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis). Best-worst scaling results were consistent across respondent subgroups, although the range of vaccine types stocked differed by practice type. CONCLUSIONS Economic factors associated with the purchase and maintenance of vaccine inventory and inadequate reimbursement for vaccination services were the most important to decision makers when considering whether to stock or not stock vaccines for adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Room M3525, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Goodman RM, Bridges CB, Kim D, Pike J, Rose A, Prosser LA, Hutton DW. Billing and payment of commercial and Medicaid health plan adult vaccination claims in Michigan since the Affordable Care Act. Vaccine 2019; 37:6803-6813. [PMID: 31585724 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Provider concern regarding insurance non-payment for vaccines is a common barrier to provision of adult immunizations. We examined current adult vaccination billing and payment associated with two managed care populations to identify reasons for non-payment of immunization insurance claims. METHODS We assessed administrative data from 2014 to 2015 from Blue Care Network of Michigan, a nonprofit health maintenance organization, and Blue Cross Complete of Michigan, a Medicaid managed care plan, to determine rates of and reasons for non-payment of adult vaccination claims across patient-care settings, insurance plans, and vaccine types. We compared commercial and Medicaid payment rates to Medicare payment rates and examined patient cost sharing. RESULTS Pharmacy-submitted claims for adult vaccine doses were almost always paid (commercial 98.5%; Medicaid 100%). As the physician office accounted for the clear majority (79% commercial; 69% Medicaid) of medical (non-pharmacy) vaccination services, we limited further analyses of both commercial and Medicaid medical claims to the physician office setting. In the physician office setting, rates of payment were high with commercial rates of payment (97.9%) greater than Medicaid rates (91.6%). Reasons for non-payment varied, but generally related to the complexity of adult vaccine recommendations (patient diagnosis does not match recommendations) or insurance coverage (complex contracts, multiple insurance payers). Vaccine administration services were also generally paid. Commercial health plan payments were greater for both vaccine dose and vaccine administration than Medicare payments; Medicaid paid a higher amount for the vaccine dose, but less for vaccine administration than Medicare. Patients generally had very low (commercial) or no (Medicaid) cost-sharing for vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Adult vaccine dose claims were usually paid. Medicaid generally had higher rates of non-payment than commercial insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Goodman
- Blue Care Network/Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Southfield, MI, United States
| | - Carolyn B Bridges
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Immunization Services Division, Atlanta, GA, United States; Berry Technology Solutions, Inc., Peachtree City, GA, United States(1)
| | - David Kim
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Immunization Services Division, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jamison Pike
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Immunization Services Division, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Angela Rose
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
McGrady ME, Prosser LA, Thompson AN, Pai ALH. Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Assess Adherence-Related Motivation Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 2019; 43:172-184. [PMID: 29049671 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To develop and pilot test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the specific factors likely to motivate a given adolescent or young adult with cancer to adhere to medications included in treatment protocols. Methods A multimethod and iterative approach was used. Twenty adolescents and young adults with cancer participated in DCE pilot testing and refinement. Hierarchical Bayes was used to estimate attribute and attribute-level preference scores for each participant. Results The final DCE included nine choice sets composed of four attributes. The resulting DCE was modified with feedback from 20 adolescents and young adults (M[SD] age = 18.66 [2.95]) with cancer. The DCE was understandable and relevant. The factors likely to motivate adolescents and young adults with cancer to be adherent differed across individuals. Conclusions DCEs including the measure developed in this manuscript offer a novel approach to understanding individual-level differences critical for informing adherence-promotion efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan E McGrady
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.,Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan
| | - Aimee N Thompson
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.,Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
| | - Ahna L H Pai
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.,Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lavelle TA, Messonnier M, Stokley S, Kim D, Ramakrishnan A, Gebremariam A, Simon NJE, Rose AM, Prosser LA. Use of a choice survey to identify adult, adolescent and parent preferences for vaccination in the United States. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:51. [PMID: 31359289 PMCID: PMC6663948 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adult and adolescent vaccination rates are far below coverage targets in the United States. Our objective was to identify the most influential factors related to vaccine uptake among adults, adolescents, and parents of adolescents (parents) in the United States. Methods We used a fractional factorial design to create a binary choice survey to evaluate preferences for vaccination. The national survey was fielded to a sample of adults, adolescents ages 13–17 years, and parents, using a national probability-based online research panel in November 2015. Respondents were presented with 5 profiles of a hypothetical vaccine and asked in a series of questions whether they would accept each vaccine. We analyzed the binary choice data using logistic regression in STATA v13 (College Station, TX) to calculate the odds that a participant would choose to accept the vaccine. Results We received completed responses from 334 (51%) of 652 adults, 316 (21%) of 1516 adolescents, and 339 (33%) of 1030 parents. Respondents were generally representative of the U.S. population. Vaccine effectiveness was the most influential factor in the choice to vaccinate for all groups. Other most influential factors were primary care provider (PCP) recommendation and the out-of-pocket cost of the vaccine. Other factors such as risk of illness, risk of vaccine side effects, vaccination location, and time for vaccination were not important in the decision to get vaccinated. Conclusions Adults, adolescents, and parents are most sensitive to vaccine effectiveness, PCP recommendation, and out-of-pocket cost for vaccination in their decision to get vaccinated. Strong PCP recommendations that focus on vaccine effectiveness and health care policies that minimize out-of-pocket costs for vaccinations may increase vaccine uptake by adults and adolescents. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41687-019-0135-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Mark Messonnier
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Shannon Stokley
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - David Kim
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | | | - Achamyeleh Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Norma-Jean E Simon
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, 225 East Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Angela M Rose
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chua KP, Brummett CM, Conti RM, Haffajee RL, Prosser LA, Bohnert AS. Assessment of Prescriber and Pharmacy Shopping Among the Family Members of Patients Prescribed Opioids. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e193673. [PMID: 31074819 PMCID: PMC6512276 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Most prescription opioid misuse involves opioids prescribed to others-a form of opioid diversion. However, few indicators of diversion risk exist. Because family members can often access patients' opioids, one such indicator may be the frequency with which opioid prescriptions are filled by patients when their family members are engaged in opioid prescriber and pharmacy shopping ("doctor and pharmacy shopping"). To date, this frequency has not been estimated. OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of opioid prescription fills for which family members meet prescriber and pharmacy shopping criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional analysis of 2015-2016 claims from a national commercial insurer was conducted from August to October, 2018. The sample included patients without cancer who were covered by family insurance plans and had 1 or more opioid prescription fill in 2016, as measured by prescription drug claims. Fills were the unit of analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES For each fill in 2016 by the patient and each family member enrolled in the same plan (eg, spouse or child), the number of prescribers and number of pharmacies in the prior 12 months were counted. Prescriber and pharmacy shopping was defined as 4 or more prescribers and 4 or more pharmacies, following a National Quality Forum-endorsed measure. The proportion of fills for which 1 or more family member met criteria and the proportion for which the patient met criteria were calculated. RESULTS Among 554 417 patients in the sample, 301 297 (54.3%) were female and 48 047 (8.7%) were children. Mean (SD) age was 41.4 (16.4) years. Patients were enrolled in 469 913 plans and, after exclusions, filled 1 471 971 opioid prescriptions in 2016. For 8485 fills (0.6%), 1 or more family member met prescriber and pharmacy shopping criteria. For 44 547 fills (3.0%), the patient met criteria. For 6947 of the 8485 fills (81.9%) for which 1 or more family member met criteria, patients did not meet criteria. When criteria were 3 or more prescribers at 3 or more pharmacies, the proportion of fills for which 1 or more family member met criteria increased to 1.9%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this national study of US patients with private family insurance plans, 0.6% of opioid prescription fills occurred when at least 1 of the patient's family members met prescriber and pharmacy shopping criteria. For most of these fills, patients did not meet criteria. Findings suggest the potential for opioid diversion within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kao-Ping Chua
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Chad M. Brummett
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor
| | - Rena M. Conti
- Institute for Health System Innovation and Policy, Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca L. Haffajee
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| | - Amy S.B. Bohnert
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wittenberg E, James LP, Prosser LA. Spillover Effects on Caregivers' and Family Members' Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:475-499. [PMID: 30887469 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00768-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing body of research has identified health-related quality-of-life effects for caregivers and family members of ill patients (i.e. 'spillover effects'), yet these are rarely considered in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to catalog spillover-related health utilities to facilitate their consideration in CEAs. METHODS We systematically reviewed the medical and economic literatures (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EconLit, from inception through 3 April 2018) to identify articles that reported preference-based measures of spillover effects. We used keywords for utility measures combined with caregivers, family members, and burden. RESULTS Of 3695 articles identified, 80 remained after screening: 8 (10%) reported spillover utility per se, as utility or disutility (i.e. utility loss); 25 (30%) reported a comparison group, either population values (n = 9) or matched, non-caregiver/family member or unaffected individuals' utilities (n = 16; 3 reported both spillover and a comparison group); and 50 (63%) reported caregiver/family member utilities only. Alzheimer's disease/dementia was the most commonly studied disease/condition, and the EQ-5D was the most commonly used measurement instrument. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive catalog of utilities showcases the spectrum of diseases and conditions for which caregiver and family members' spillover effects have been measured, and the variation in measurement methods used. In general, utilities indicated a loss in quality of life associated with being a caregiver or family member of an ill relative. Most studies reported caregiver/family member utility without any comparator, limiting the ability to infer spillover effects. Nevertheless, these values provide a starting point for considering spillover effects in the context of CEA, opening the door for more comprehensive analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Lyndon P James
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lavelle TA, Weinstein MC, Newhouse JP, Munir K, Kuhlthau KA, Prosser LA. Parent Preferences for Health Outcomes Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:541-551. [PMID: 30895565 PMCID: PMC6469598 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00783-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have used preference-based quality-of-life outcomes to assess how autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) affect children and parents, and none have examined variation by ASD severity. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to derive parent valuations of child and parent health associated with varying ASD severity levels. METHODS Parents of children aged 3-17 years with and without ASD were selected from a nationally representative research panel to complete a survey. We asked parents time trade-off (TTO) questions to value their own and their child's current health. Parents of children with ASD were asked to report the severity of their child's core ASD symptoms. We calculated utility values from each TTO amount, and used a two-part regression model to estimate the change in parent-reported child health utility, as well as parent health utility, associated with ASD diagnosis and increasing symptom severity, controlling for respondent and child characteristics. RESULTS Sixty-nine percent of parents responded (final sample size was 135 in the ASD group and 120 in the comparison group). In adjusted analyses, there was a 0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.21) decrease in the parent-reported health utility of children with ASD, a 15% decrease from the mean health utility of children without ASD. On average, having a child with ASD was not significantly associated with a decrease in parent health utility, but there was a 0.14 (95% CI 0.01-0.26) reduction in health utility among parents of children with severe ASD, a 15% decrease from the comparison group mean. CONCLUSIONS Overall, ASD had a significant impact on parent-reported child health utility, and the health utility of parents of children with severe ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Milton C Weinstein
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph P Newhouse
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA, USA
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kerim Munir
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen A Kuhlthau
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lavelle TA, D'Cruz BN, Mohit B, Ungar WJ, Prosser LA, Tsiplova K, Vera-Llonch M, Lin PJ. Family Spillover Effects in Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019; 17:163-174. [PMID: 30350218 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0436-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood illness can impose significant costs and health strains on family members, but these are not routinely captured by pediatric economic evaluations. This review investigated how family "spillover effects" related to costs and health outcomes are considered in pediatric cost-utility analyses (CUAs). METHODS We reviewed pediatric CUAs published between 2000 and 2015 using the Tufts Medical Center Cost-effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) Registry. We selected studies conducted from the societal perspective and included in both registries. We investigated how frequently family spillover was incorporated into analyses, and how the inclusion of spillover health effects and costs changed CUA results. RESULTS We found 142 pediatric CUAs meeting inclusion criteria. Of those, 105 (72%) considered either family spillover costs (n = 98 time costs, n = 33 out-of-pocket costs, n = 2 caregiver healthcare costs) or health outcomes (n = 15). Twenty-four studies included 43 pairs of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with and without spillover. In 19 pairs of ICERs, adding spillover changed the ICER enough to cross a common cost-effectiveness threshold (i.e., $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY, $150,000/QALY; values are in 2016 US$). Incorporating spillover generally made interventions more cost-effective (n = 18; 42%), or did not change CUA results enough to cross a threshold (n = 24; 56%). Including family spillover reduced ICERs by 31% ($40,000/QALY) on average. CONCLUSION Most pediatric CUAs conducted from a societal perspective include family costs but fewer include family health effects. Inclusion of family spillover effects tends to make CUA results more favorable. Future pediatric CUAs should aim to more fully incorporate the family burden of illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Brittany N D'Cruz
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Babak Mohit
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kate Tsiplova
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Prosser LA, Harpaz R, Rose AM, Gebremariam A, Guo A, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Zhou F, Dooling K. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Vaccination for Prevention of Herpes Zoster and Related Complications: Input for National Recommendations. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:380-388. [PMID: 30776797 DOI: 10.7326/m18-2347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently developed recommendations for use of a new recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV compared with zoster vaccine live (ZVL) and no vaccination, the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV for persons who have previously received ZVL, and the cost-effectiveness of preferential vaccination with RZV over ZVL. DESIGN Simulation (state-transition) model using U.S. epidemiologic, clinical, and cost data. DATA SOURCES Published data. TARGET POPULATION Hypothetical cohort of immunocompetent U.S. adults aged 50 years or older. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Societal and health care sector. INTERVENTION Vaccination with RZV (recommended 2-dose regimen), vaccination with ZVL, and no vaccination. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS For vaccination with RZV compared with no vaccination, ICERs ranged by age from $10 000 to $47 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), using a societal perspective and assuming 100% completion of the 2-dose RZV regimen. For persons aged 60 years or older, ICERs were less than $60 000 per QALY. Vaccination with ZVL was dominated by vaccination with RZV for all age groups 60 years or older. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Results were most sensitive to changes in vaccine effectiveness, duration of protection, herpes zoster incidence, and probability of postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination with RZV after previous administration of ZVL yielded an ICER of less than $60 000 per QALY for persons aged 60 years or older. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, RZV remained the preferred strategy in at least 95% of simulations, including those with 50% completion of the second dose. LIMITATION Few data were available on risk for serious adverse events, adherence to the recommended 2-dose regimen, and probability of recurrent zoster. CONCLUSION Vaccination with RZV yields cost-effectiveness ratios lower than those for many recommended adult vaccines, including ZVL. Results are robust over a wide range of plausible values. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center at University of Michigan Medical School and University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.A.P.)
| | - Rafael Harpaz
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.)
| | - Angela M Rose
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center at University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.M.R., A.G.)
| | - Acham Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center at University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.M.R., A.G.)
| | - Angela Guo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.)
| | - Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.)
| | - Fangjun Zhou
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.)
| | - Kathleen Dooling
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Simon NJ, Richardson J, Ahmad A, Rose A, Wittenberg E, D'Cruz B, Prosser LA. Health utilities and parental quality of life effects for three rare conditions tested in newborns. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:4. [PMID: 30671727 PMCID: PMC6342747 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of health utilities is required for economic evaluations. Few studies have evaluated health utilities for rare conditions; even fewer have incorporated disutility that may be experienced by caregivers. This study aimed to (1) estimate health utilities for three rare conditions currently recommended for newborn screening at the state or federal level, and (2) estimate the disutility, or spillover, experienced by parents of patients diagnosed with a rare, heritable disorder. METHODS A stated-preference survey using a time trade-off approach elicited health utilities for Krabbe disease, phenylketonuria, and Pompe disease at varying stages (mild, moderate, severe) and onset of disease symptoms (infancy, childhood, and adulthood). We recruited respondents from a nationally representative community sample (n = 862). Respondents valued disease specific health states in three consecutive question frames: (1) adult health state (> = 18 years of age), (2) child health state (< 18 years of age), and (3) as a parent of a child with a condition (parent spillover state). Corresponding mean utilities were calculated for plausible disease states in adulthood and childhood. Mean disutility was estimated for parental spillover. Predictors of utilities were evaluated using a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS More severe conditions and infant health states received lower estimated utility and greater estimated disutility among parents. Conditions with the lowest estimated health utilities were severe infantile Pompe disease (0.40, CI: 0.34-0.46) and infantile Krabbe disease (0.37, CI: 0.32-0.43). Disutility was evident for all conditions evaluated (range: 0.07-0.19). CONCLUSIONS Rare childhood conditions are associated with substantial estimated losses in quality of life. Evidence of disutility among parents further warrants the inclusion of spillover effects in cost-effectiveness analyses. Continued research is needed to assess and measure the effects of childhood disease from a family perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma-Jean Simon
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - John Richardson
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Ayesha Ahmad
- Division of Pediatric Genetics, Metabolism and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan Medical School, 4810 Jackson Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA
| | - Angela Rose
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, 300 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Brittany D'Cruz
- Center for the Evaluation of Value & Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, 300 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Health Management and Policy, The University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rozier MD, Ghaferi AA, Rose A, Simon NJ, Birkmeyer N, Prosser LA. Patient Preferences for Bariatric Surgery: Findings From a Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment Methodology. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:e184375. [PMID: 30484820 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Importance Surgical options for weight loss vary considerably in risks and benefits, but the relative importance of procedure-associated characteristics in patient decision making is largely unknown. Objective To identify patient preferences for risks, benefits, and other attributes of treatment options available to individuals who are candidates for bariatric surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This discrete choice experiment of weight loss procedures was performed as an internet-based survey administered to patients recruited from bariatric surgery information sessions in the State of Michigan. Each procedure was described by the following set of attributes: (1) treatment method, (2) recovery and reversibility, (3) time that treatment has been available, (4) expected weight loss, (5) effect on other medical conditions, (6) risk of complication, (7) adverse effects, (8) changes to diet, and (9) out-of-pocket costs. Participants chose between surgical profiles by comparing attributes. Survey data were collected from May 1, 2015, through January 30, 2016, and analyzed from February 1 to June 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures Estimated relative value of risks and benefits for leading weight-loss surgical options and marginal willingness to pay for procedure attributes. A latent class analysis identified respondent subgroups. Results Among the 815 respondents (79.9% women; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [12.0] years), profiles of hypothetical procedures that included resolution of medical conditions (coefficient for full resolution, 0.229 [95% CI, 0.177 to 0.280; P < .001]; coefficient for no resolution, -0.207 [95% CI, -0.254 to -0.159; P < .001]), higher total weight loss (coefficient for each additional 20% loss, 0.185 [95% CI, 0.166 to 0.205; P < .001]), and lower out-of-pocket costs (coefficient for each additional $1000, -0.034 [95% CI, -0.042 to -0.025; P < .001]) were most likely to be selected. Younger respondents were more likely than older respondents to choose treatments with higher weight loss (coefficient for loss of 80% excess weight 0.543 [95% CI, 0.435-0.651] vs 0.397 [95% CI, 0.315-0.482]) and were more sensitive to out-of-pocket costs (coefficient for $100 out-of-pocket costs, 0.346 [95% CI, 0.221-0.470] vs 0.262 [95% CI, 0.174 to 0.350]; coefficient for $15 000 in out-of-pocket costs, -0.768 [95% CI, -0.938 to -0.598] vs -0.384 [95% CI, -0.500 to -0.268]). Marginal willingness to pay indicated respondents would pay $5470 for losing each additional 20% of excess body weight and $12 843 for resolution of existing medical conditions, the most desired procedure attributes. Latent class analysis identified the following 3 unobserved subgroups: cost-sensitive (most concerned with costs); benefit-focused (most concerned with excess weight loss and resolution of medical conditions); and procedure-focused (most concerned with how the treatment itself worked, including recovery and reversibility). Conclusions and Relevance Candidates for bariatric surgery identified costs, expected weight loss, and resolution of medical conditions as the most important characteristics of weight loss surgery decisions. Other information, such as risk of complications and adverse effects, were important to patients but less so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Rozier
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Amir A Ghaferi
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Department of Management and Organizations, University of Michigan Ross School of Business, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Angela Rose
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Nancy Birkmeyer
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor.,Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Prosser
- Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tarini BA, Simon NJ, Payne K, Gebremariam A, Rose A, Prosser LA. An Assessment of Public Preferences for Newborn Screening Using Best-Worst Scaling. J Pediatr 2018; 201:62-68.e1. [PMID: 30025667 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and quantify public preferences for attributes of newborn screening conditions. STUDY DESIGN We conducted an online national survey of the public (n = 502) to evaluate preferences for attributes of candidate newborn screening conditions. Respondents were presented with hypothetical condition profiles that were defined using 10 attributes with 2-6 levels per attribute. Participants indicated whether they would recommend screening for a condition and which condition attributes were most and least important when making this decision (best-worst scaling). Difference scores were calculated and stratified by condition recommendation (recommend or not recommend for screening). Regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of attributes on choice to screen or not screen. RESULTS The number of babies diagnosed was important to those who would recommend newborn screening for a profile, and age at which the treatment would start was important to those who would not recommend newborn screening. Cost was considered to be a key attribute, and treatment effectiveness and impact of making the diagnosis through newborn screening were of low importance for both groups. CONCLUSION Public preferences identified through survey methods that provide an adequate baseline understanding of newborn screening can be used to inform newborn screening decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth A Tarini
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Child Health Research and Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Norma-Jean Simon
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Acham Gebremariam
- Child Health Research and Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Angela Rose
- Child Health Research and Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Child Health Research and Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Herman WH, Braffett BH, Kuo S, Lee JM, Brandle M, Jacobson AM, Prosser LA, Lachin JM. What are the clinical, quality-of-life, and cost consequences of 30 years of excellent vs. poor glycemic control in type 1 diabetes? J Diabetes Complications 2018; 32:911-915. [PMID: 30082172 PMCID: PMC6459401 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes delayed the development of microvascular and neuropathic complications compared to conventional therapy. At the end of DCCT, all participants were trained in intensive therapy, care was transferred to community providers, and the difference in HbA1c between treatment groups narrowed and disappeared. Our objective was to describe the outcomes and the quality-of-life and costs associated with those outcomes in participants who maintained excellent vs. poor glycemic control over 30 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We assessed the incidence of retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, acute metabolic complications, death, quality-of-life, and costs in the tertile of DCCT intensive therapy participants who achieved a mean updated HbA1c of <7.2% (55 mmol/mol) and the tertile of DCCT conventional therapy participants (n = 240) who achieved a mean updated HbA1c of >8.8% (73 mmol/mol) over 30 years. RESULTS Thirty years of excellent vs. poor glycemic control substantially reduced the incidence of retinopathy requiring laser therapy (5% vs. 45%), end-stage renal disease (0% vs. 5%), clinical neuropathy (15% vs. 50%), myocardial infarction (3% vs. 5%), stroke (0.4% vs. 2%), and death (6% vs. 20%). It also resulted in a gain of ~1.62 quality-adjusted life-years and averted ~$90,900 in costs of complications per participant. CONCLUSIONS Thirty years of excellent vs. poor glycemic control for T1DM can substantially reduce the incidence of complications, comorbidities, and death, improve quality-of-life, and reduce costs. These estimates represent the benefits that may be achieved with excellent glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Herman
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
| | - Barbara H Braffett
- The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Shihchen Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Joyce M Lee
- Pediatric Endocrinology, Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Michael Brandle
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Sankt Gallen, SG, Switzerland
| | - Alan M Jacobson
- Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY, United States of America
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - John M Lachin
- The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|