Duration of anticoagulant therapy and VTE recurrence in patients with cancer

Abelacimab in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Right Drug at the Right Time for the Right Purpose. A Comprehensive Review

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a devastating complication of cancer that can significantly impact a patient's health and life. The incidence of CAT is approximately 20%, and 1 in 5 cancer patients will develop CAT annually. Indeed, CAT can promote pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality that dramatically impact survival. CAT can also provoke delay or discontinuation of anticancer treatment, which may result in a lack of treatment efficacy and high costs for patients, institutions, and society. Current guidelines advocate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line anticoagulant option in CAT. Compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs), DOACs are advantageous in that they typically have an oral route of administration, do not require laboratory monitoring, and have a more predictable anticoagulant effect. However, in patients with thrombocytopenia, renal failure, or those receiving anticancer regimens with potential for drug-drug interactions, LMWH is still the mainstay of care. The main limitation of current anticoagulant agents is related to bleeding risk (BR), both for DOACs and LMWHs. Specifically, DOACs have been associated with high BR in gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers. In this challenging scenario, abelacimab, an anti-factor XI agent, could represent a viable option in the management of CAT due to its "hemostasis sparing" effect. The safe profile of abelacimab could be useful in patients with active malignancy and CAT, as long-term anticoagulant therapy is often required. Two ongoing international phase III trials (Aster and Magnolia) compare abelacimab with the standard of care (i.e., apixaban in patients with CAT and dalteparin in those with CAT and high BR, respectively). Abelacimab is a new and attractive anticoagulant for the management of CAT, especially in the insidious and critical scenario of active cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and high BR. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the updated evidence on the performance of DOACs and LMWHs in the treatment of CAT and to focus on the potential role of abelacimab in CAT and its promising associated clinical trials.

Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications in patients with cancer and isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a common clinical presentation of DVT. The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for the management of IDDVT in patients with cancer are unclear. We sought to assess the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in this patient population.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, from inception to June 2, 2022 was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and mortality. The incidence rates of thrombotic, bleeding, and mortality outcomes were pooled using random effects model and expressed as events per 100 patient-months with associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 5234 articles, 10 observational studies including 8160 patients with cancer and IDDVT were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 5.65 (95 % CI: 2.09-15.30) per 100 patient-years regardless of type and duration of anticoagulant therapy. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 4.08 (95 % CI: 2.52-6.61) per 100 patient-years. The incidence rates for CRNMB and mortality per 100 patient-years were 8.11 (95 % CI: 5.56-11.83) and 30.22 (95 % CI: 22.60-40.42.89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cancer and IDDVT are at high risk of developing recurrent VTE and bleeding complications (both major bleeding and CRNMB). More studies are needed to define the optimal management for this high-risk population.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of PICC-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration and choice of anticoagulant for the treatment of Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) in cancer patients are still undetermined.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of PICC-related UEDVT in cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including consecutive cancer patients for the management of acute symptomatic PICC-related UEDVT. The efficacy outcome of the study was the 180-day recurrence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE), while the safety outcome was the 180-day incidence of all bleeding events. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to estimate the overall incidence. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained with a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the risk of the outcome events.

RESULTS

A total of 217 patients were included in the final analysis with a median age of 56 years old, 41.5% of whom had metastases. After the initial 3-5 days of nadroparin, patients received sequential anticoagulation, either with nadroparin (118 patients) or with rivaroxaban (99 patients). Four patients with recurrent VTE were observed (nadroparin, n = 2; rivaroxaban, n = 2). The 180-day cumulative VTE recurrence rates were 1.7% and 2.0% (p = 0.777) in patients receiving nadroparin and rivaroxaban, respectively. The overall bleeding rate at 180 days was 8.8%. Although no major bleeding events were observed, nineteen patients with clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were observed. The 180-day cumulative rate of CRNMB was 5.1% for nadroparin and 13.1% for rivaroxaban (HR = 3.303, 95% CI 1.149-9.497, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our study supported the efficacy of rivaroxaban for treating PICC-related UEDVT in cancer patients. However, data on anticoagulation therapy for PICC-related UEDVT presented with a low risk of VTE recurrence and a relatively high risk of CRNMB bleeding events. Considering the risk-benefit ratio, further well-designed trials are required to optimize the drug selection and duration for the treatment of PICC-related UEDVT in cancer patients.

Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism: a real-world analysis

This study was conducted in patients treated for initial venous thromboembolism (VTE) for approximately 6 months to enhance understanding of the risk factors to inform clinical decision-making about long-term anticoagulation therapy. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database in the United States. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with recurrent VTE. A total of 13 831 patients had an index VTE event, and recurrent VTE occurred in 844 (6.1%) of these patients over a median follow-up of 22.8 months. Baseline comorbidities of arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with recurrent VTE. During the period of anticoagulation treatment after the index VTE, use of antidepressants was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE, whereas use of antibiotics and major surgery were associated with a decreased risk. In the 6 months prior to index VTE, anti-inflammatory agents and major surgery were associated with a decreased risk of recurrent VTE. The type of index VTE was also significantly associated with recurrent VTE, with an increased risk observed in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) alone or PE with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) versus DVT alone. This real-world analysis identified baseline comorbidities, medications, and index VTE type to be factors predictive of recurrent VTE among patients treated for index VTE for approximately 6 months. Consideration of these factors may assist in the identification of patients who may benefit from extended anticoagulant therapy.

Population-based study of long-term anticoagulation for treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in men with prostate cancer in Sweden

Background

Epidemiological data on anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in prostate cancer are sparse. We aimed to investigate associations between anticoagulation duration and risks of VTE recurrence after treatment cessation and major on-treatment bleeding in men with prostate cancer in Sweden.

Methods

Using nationwide prostate cancer registry and prescribing data, we followed 1413 men with VTE and an outpatient anticoagulant prescription following prostate cancer diagnosis. Men were followed to identify cases of recurrent VTE, and hospitalized major bleeding. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the association between anticoagulation duration (reference ≤ 3 months) and recurrent VTE using Cox regression. We estimated 1-year cumulative incidences of major bleedings from anticoagulation initiation.

Results

The outpatient anticoagulation prescribed was parenteral (64%), direct oral anticoagulant (31%), and vitamin K antagonist (20%). Median duration of anticoagulation was 7 months. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for off-treatment recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) were 0.32 (0.09–1.15) for > 3–6 months’ duration, 0.21 (0.06–0.69) for > 6–9 months and 0.16 (0.05–0.55) for > 9 months; corresponding HRs for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were 0.67 (0.27–1.66), 0.80 (0.31–2.07), and 1.19 (0.47–3.02). One-year cumulative incidences of intracranial, gastrointestinal and urogenital bleeding were 0.9%, 1.7%, 3.0% during treatment, and 1.2%, 0.9%, 1.6% after treatment cessation.

Conclusion

The greatest possible benefit in reducing recurrent VTE risk occurred with > 9 months anticoagulation for PE and > 3–6 months for DVT, but larger studies are needed to confirm this. Risks of major bleeding were low overall.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-00967-z.

Overall survival with warfarin vs. low-molecular-weight heparin in cancer-associated thrombosis

BACKGROUND

When compared with warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) reduces the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer. However, a survival benefit of LMWH over warfarin for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE has not been established.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results and Medicare linked database from 2007 through 2016, we identified Medicare beneficiaries (aged ≥66 years) who were: (1) diagnosed with primary gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, ovarian, or brain cancer; (2) diagnosed with cancer-associated VTE; and (3) prescribed LMWH or warfarin within 30 days. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Patients were matched 1:1 using exact matching for cancer stage and propensity score matching for cancer diagnosis, age, year of VTE, and time from cancer diagnosis to index VTE. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 9706 patients were included. Warfarin was associated with a significant improvement in OS compared with LMWH (median OS, 9.8 months [95% CI, 9.1-10.4] vs. 7.2 months [95% CI, 6.8-7.8]; HR, 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.90; p < .001). The survival advantage was most pronounced in pancreatic (HR 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.90], p < .001) and gastric cancers (HR 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68-0.98], p = .03). The observed differences in survival were consistent across subgroups including cancer stage, age, comorbidity burden, and year of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, warfarin was associated with improved OS compared with LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Pancreaticobiliary Malignancies in the Emergency Room: Management of Acute Complications and Oncological Emergencies

Background

Management of pancreaticobiliary (PB) malignancies remains a clinical challenge. In this review, we focus on the management of oncological emergencies in PB malignancies and the potential complication of associated therapeutic interventions.

Methods

Biobliographic review of current evidence on the management of oncological emergencies, their potential complications, as well as synthesis of recommendations was performed. The pathogenesis, frequency, related symptoms as well as appropriate investigations are presented.

Results

The oncologic emergencies in PB patients were summarised in six categories: (1) hematological (including febrile neutropaenia, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathies), (2) gastrointestinal (gastric outlet and biliary obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding), (3) thromboembolic events, (4) ascites, (5) metabolic disorders and (6) neurologic complications. The pathogenesis, frequency, related symptoms as well as appropriate investigations are also presented.

Conclusion

Patients with PB malignancies are at increased risk of a wide variation of medical emergencies. Clinical knowledge, early recognition and collaboration with the relevant specialties are critical to manage these complications effectively, tailoring overall management around the actual prognosis and individuals’ expectations.

Risk Factors for Major Bleeding During Anticoagulation Therapy in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism - From the COMMAND VTE Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at high risk for recurrent VTE and are recommended to receive prolonged anticoagulation therapy if they are at a low risk for bleeding. However, there are no established risk factors for bleeding during anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The COMMAND VTE Registry is a multicenter retrospective registry enrolling 3,027 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE among 29 Japanese centers. The present study population consisted of 592 cancer-associated VTE patients with anticoagulation therapy. We constructed a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the potential risk factors for major bleeding. During a median follow-up period of 199 days, major bleeding occurred in 72 patients. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 5.8% at 3 months, 13.8% at 1 year, 17.5% at 2 years, and 28.1% at 5 years. The most frequent major bleeding site was gastrointestinal tract (47%). Terminal cancer (adjusted HR, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.22-7.85, P<0.001), chronic kidney disease (adjusted HR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.06-3.37, P=0.031), and gastrointestinal cancer (adjusted HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.04-3.04, P=0.037) were independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Major bleeding events were common during anticoagulation therapy in real-world cancer-associated VTE patients. Terminal cancer, chronic kidney disease, and gastrointestinal cancer were the independent risk factors for major bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are still debated in the treatment of patients with cancer, and the optimal duration of therapy remains uncertain. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched to retrieve studies on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in treating patients with cancer from January 1980 to October 2018. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding. Our study included two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine observational studies, together comprising 4509 patients with cancer. The pooled estimates indicated that DOACs led to a modest reduction recurrent VTE in the RCTs [RR: 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.96, P = 0.03] and in the observational studies (RR: 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.93, P = 0.011), without increasing the risk of major bleeding for observational studies (P = 0.805), but increased for RCTs (P = 0.017). The same trends were observed in the rivaroxaban subgroup. Moreover, subgroup analyses according to the treatment duration indicated that DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE (P = 0.006 at 6 months; P < 0.001 at 12 months) without significant differences in major bleeding compared with LMWH at 6 or 12 months. Patients with cancer who received DOACs exhibited a significant reduction in recurrent VTE with no increased risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH. DOACs may be an alternative choice for long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer.