Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and medically traumatic events (TEs) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: a report from the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) randomized controlled trial

De quelles façons les infirmières peuvent-elles promouvoir la résilience chez les adolescents atteints d’un cancer en traitement actif?: un examen de la portée

Objectif

Explorer les connaissances sur les interventions de promotion de la résilience chez les adolescents atteints de cancer en traitement actif. La question ici utilisée pour guider la recherche est: De quelles façons les infirmières peuvent-elles promouvoir la résilience chez les adolescents atteints de cancer en traitement actif?

Introduction

L’adolescence est une période de forte turbulence développementale (Young, 2014 ). Le diagnostic d’une maladie oncologique contribue à la détresse et diminue la qualité de vie (Sodergren et al., 2017 ). Certains adolescents semblent cependant développer des mécanismes d’adaptation positifs générant une plus grande résilience (Bellizzi et al., 2012 ; Sodergren et al., 2017 ). Les infirmières sont amenées à accompagner ces adolescents parfois sur de longues périodes et peuvent donc être des actrices clés dans le soutien à la résilience auprès de cette clientèle.

Méthode

Nous avons cherché en anglais et en français dans trois bases de données (CINAHL, PubMed, PsycArticles) en février 2023 en utilisant des limitateurs (2013–2023; adolescents). La sélection des sources potentielles a été réalisée sur la base de l’étude de Pollock et collaborateurs (2021) . L’extraction, l’analyse et la présentation des données ont été effectuées en respectant la structure proposée par le JBI Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (Tricco et al., 2018 ). Les données extraites ont été classées dans l’un des facteurs (de protection ou de risque) du Resilience in Illness Model (RIM) en utilisant une méthode déductive (Haase et al., 2014 , 2017 ). Nous avons finalement extrapolé de possibles interventions dans lesquelles l’approche infirmière pourrait contribuer à la résilience des adolescents atteints de cancer en traitement actif.

Résultats

La méthode utilisée a permis de retracer 86 articles, dont 17 répondaient aux critères de sélection. De ce nombre, 10 étaient de nature quantitative; 3, de nature qualitative; 3, de nature théorique (incluant les revues de littérature et méta-analyse) et 1 de nature éditoriale. La majorité (n = 15) de ces articles proviennent des États-Unis. Depuis 2013, aucune étude ne s’est spécifiquement intéressée au rôle et aux interventions infirmières dans la promotion de la résilience auprès des adolescents atteints de cancer en traitement actif.

Conclusions

En fonction des résultats de cette étude et considérant que d’autres études existent sur le rôle de l’infirmière chez les adolescents atteints de maladie chronique non oncologique, nous estimons que l’infirmière œuvrant en oncologie pédiatrique peut être une actrice clé auprès de cette population en ce qui concerne la promotion de la résilience. Les recherches portant sur ce domaine spécifique s’avéreraient prometteuses afin de soutenir efficacement l’adaptation et la résilience chez les adolescents atteints de cancer en traitement actif.

How nurses can promote resilience among adolescents receiving active cancer treatment: A scoping review

Objective

Explore knowledge on resilience-promoting interventions among adolescents receiving active cancer treatment. The question used to guide the research was: How can nurses promote resilience among adolescents receiving active cancer treatment?

Introduction

Adolescence is a very turbulent stage of development (Young, 2014). A cancer diagnosis at this age contributes to emotional distress and reduces quality of life (Sodergren et al., 2017). However, some youth develop positive coping mechanisms that lead to increased resilience (Bellizzi et al., 2012; Sodergren et al., 2017). Because nurses often care for these patients over an extended period of time, they can play an important role in fostering this resilience.

Method

Three databases (CINAHL, PubMed and PsycArticles) were consulted in February 2023, using research limiters "2013-2023" and "adolescents" (teenagers) both in French and in English. Potentially relevant sources were selected based on the guidelines identified by Pollock et al., (2021). Data were extracted, analyzed and presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (Tricco et al., 2018). The results were categorized, using deductive reasoning, as either protective factors or risk factors, in line with the Resilience in Illness Model (RIM; (Haase et al., 2014, 2017). Finally, potential interventions were identified where nurses can foster resilience among adolescents actively undergoing cancer treatment.

Results

The method used returned 86 studies, 17 of which met the selection criteria. Of these, 10 were quantitative in nature, three were qualitative, three were theoretical (including literature reviews and meta-analyses) and one was an editorial. The majority (n = 15) were published in the United States. There have been no studies specifically examining the role of nurses in promoting resilience among adolescents undergoing active cancer treatment since 2013.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this paper, considering that information has been published on the role nurses serve in caring for adolescents who have a chronic illness other than cancer, the conclusion is that pediatric oncology nurses can be key players in promoting resilience among patients at this stage of development. Studies focusing specifically on this topic would be useful in determining how to facilitate adaptation and foster resilience effectively among adolescents receiving active cancer treatment.

Association between adverse childhood experiences and self-reported health-risk behaviors among cancer survivors: A population-based study

AIMS

Existing evidence shows that people who report Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are more likely to exhibit health-risk behaviors. However, limited research on this topic pertains to oncology population. We aim to address this knowledge gap by estimating the prevalence of ACEs and investigating their association with self-reported health-risk behaviors among adult cancer survivors living in the U.S.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis using cross-sectional data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ACE module. We included 4,126 adults, aged ≥18 years, with a history of cancer. The outcome variable was self-reported health-risk behaviors, which included cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and binge alcohol drinking. Self-reported ACEs history was the primary independent variable, comprised of 11 questions regarding child abuse and dysfunctional households. We conducted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression to describe the relationship between the ACE history and health-risk behaviors.

RESULTS

Overall, 84.2% of cancer survivors self-reported as White, 58.4% were women, and 76.6% were aged 65+ years. Nearly two-thirds of the sample (63.2%) self-reported at least one ACE (prior to age 18) and 21.7% engaged in ≥1 health-risk-behaviors, such as cigarette smoking, binge alcohol drinking, or e-cigarette use. Experiencing ≥3 ACEs was associated with 145% increased odds of reporting at least one health-risk behavior (OR = 2.45, 95% CI [1.78-3.38]) when compared to those without a history of ACEs. Besides, survivors who were younger, divorced, less educated, and had low income had higher odds of reporting at least one health-risk behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a history of ACEs is associated with health-risk behaviors. These all can negatively impact cancer survivors' overall well-being. Early screening for ACE during oncologic visits can be a protective measure for preventing health-risk behaviors among cancer survivors.

Developmental Neuroendocrinology of Early-Life Stress: Impact on Child Development and Behavior

Our internal balance, or homeostasis, is threatened or perceived as threatened by stressful stimuli, the stressors. The stress system is a highly conserved system that adjusts homeostasis to the resting state. Through the concurrent activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the locus coeruleus/norepinephrine-autonomic nervous systems, the stress system provides the appropriate physical and behavioral responses, collectively termed as "stress response", to restore homeostasis. If the stress response is prolonged, excessive or even inadequate, several acute or chronic stress-related pathologic conditions may develop in childhood, adolescence and adult life. On the other hand, earlylife exposure to stressors has been recognized as a major contributing factor underlying the pathogenesis of non-communicable disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders. Accumulating evidence suggests that early-life stress has been associated with an increased risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in the offspring, although findings are still controversial. Nevertheless, at the molecular level, early-life stressors alter the chemical structure of cytosines located in the regulatory regions of genes, mostly through the addition of methyl groups. These epigenetic modifications result in the suppression of gene expression without changing the DNA sequence. In addition to DNA methylation, several lines of evidence support the role of non-coding RNAs in the evolving field of epigenetics. In this review article, we present the anatomical and functional components of the stress system, discuss the proper, in terms of quality and quantity, stress response, and provide an update on the impact of early-life stress on child development and behavior.

Palliative Care Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review

Objective

To map the range of multidisciplinary palliative care interventions that are available to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with serious illness.

Methods

Scoping review methodology as outlined by Arksey and O'Malley.

Results

Twenty-two articles describing nine specific AYA-focused, multidisciplinary palliative care interventions were included in this review. Interventions focused on supporting advance care planning (ACP), facilitating treatment decision making, managing pain, and promoting resilience, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. Interventions were delivered face-to-face and via different eHealth platforms and were targeted to AYAs with cancer, HIV/AIDS, and cystic fibrosis in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Conclusions

Few evidence-based multidisciplinary palliative care interventions have documented benefit for AYAs with serious illness. The limited work that has been done demonstrates that AYAs are open to engaging in palliative care interventions and suggests that individual members of the multidisciplinary team can implement these different interventions to support enhanced patient outcomes.

Assessment of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Cancer at 2 Years: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have a high risk of poor psychosocial outcomes. The Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention is one of few psychosocial interventions targeting younger people with cancer that has demonstrated efficacy in a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To explore 2-year trajectories of patient-reported well-being among AYA cancer survivors. The hypothesis was that AYAs who initially responded to PRISM would report sustained positive changes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This secondary analysis of data from a single-center, parallel, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 2015 to October 2016. Eligible participants were English-speaking AYAs between ages 13 and 25 years with cancer treated at a single, quaternary children's hospital in the US. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to PRISM or usual care. Data were analyzed between March 2021 and June 2021.

INTERVENTION

PRISM is a brief, skills-based coaching program targeting 4 resilience resources (stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning making).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient-reported cancer-related quality of life (QoL) (PedsQL scale), hope (Hope scale), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience scale), and psychological distress (Kessler-6 scale) were collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data from AYAs who remained alive at 24 months were analyzed. Improvement was defined as a positive change in instrument scores between baseline and 6 months (ie, the end of the PRISM program) and used linear mixed effects regression to assess changes over time.

RESULTS

A total of 57 AYAs were included in analysis at 24 months (62% of 92 randomized). Twenty-six participants (46%) were female; 36 (63%) were between ages 13 and 17 years; and 20 (35%) identified as part of a racial or ethnic minority group (4 [7%] Asian, 11 [19%] Hispanic or Latino, 16 [28%] mixed race or other). PRISM was associated with improved QoL, hope, resilience, and distress between baseline and 6 months, and these associations were sustained for QoL over 12 months (β = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.8 to 14; P = .03) and hope throughout the study period (12 months: β = 6.2; 95% CI, 2.7 to 9.6; P < .001; 24 months: β = 4.6; 95% CI, 1 to 8.3; P = .01). Of those whose scores improved between baseline and 6 months, PRISM participants more commonly reported sustained improvements in QoL (16 of 21 participants [76%] vs 8 of 17 [47%]), hope (14 of 24 participants [58%] vs 6 of 14 [43%]), resilience (9 of 18 participants [50%] vs 4 of 14 [29%]), and distress (14 of 19 participants [74%] vs 6 of 19 [32%]) at 24 months compared with usual care.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results suggest that PRISM was associated with sustained improvements in psychosocial outcomes as reported by adolescents and young adults. Those who responded to PRISM in the first 6 months reported continued well-being 2 years later.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02340884.