Effect of perioperative pain neuroscience education in patients with post-mastectomy persistent pain: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study

Nonpharmacological Interventions for Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome-A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Literature regarding nonpharmacological interventions (NPI) for PMPS or CP after mastectomy is scarce and not fully appraised, therefore we conducted this systematic review to explore the current panorama of treatment options.

METHODS

A systematic review to assess the existing evidence regarding nonpharmacological approaches for PMPS. We reviewed the following databases: PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Ovid (including the Cochrane Database for Clinical studies) using the following search terms: CP, mastectomy, and PMPS, and adjusted the terms depending on the database used. We included observational studies including case reports, cross sectional studies, cohort studies, and clinical trials (randomized or not) that included a NPI to treat PMPS.

RESULTS

Total 1061 records were identified. After duplicate elimination, 863 records were screened for eligibility. A total of 717 records were excluded using our criteria, 138 records were sought for retrieval, and 117 full text records were assessed. Finally, 30 studies were included: seven case series, one cross-sectional study, two cohort studies, one case-control study, five nonrandomized clinical trials, ten randomized clinical trials (RCT), one qualitative study, and three systematic reviews of the literature, including two meta analyses, were included.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that there is a great response of patients to some NPI. Regarding surgical interventions, autologous fat grafting and lymph node transplantation showed to have the greatest benefit for patients in terms of quality of life and reduced pain scores. Pulsed radiofrequency demonstrated the highest quality of evidence for energy related procedures. Within the physical therapy interventions, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation and dry needling showed the greatest benefit. Finally, virtual reality demonstrated the greatest benefit in educational interventions.

The effect of peri-operative pain neuroscience education on pain and recovery in adult patients receiving laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

To optimize the efficacy of analgesia for patients receiving laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, peri-operative pain neuroscience education (PNE) as a pain-specific cognitive therapy was incorporated into multi-modal analgesia. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare conventional analgesia (group CA) and the addition of pain neuroscience education into it (group PNE) in patients receiving laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Characteristics of peri-operative pain was evaluated with Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN-4), central sensitization inventory (CSI), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) post-operatively and pressure pain threshold. Post-operative quality of recovery was measured with EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The incidence of chronic post-operative pain was also recorded. A total of 184 patients consented to participate in this study and finished follow-up. Compared with those receiving conventional analgesia (group CA, N = 91), patients in group PNE (N = 93) reported reduced incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and less dosages of opioid during hospitalization (p < 0.05). Catastrophing, sensitization related to pain were reduced in group PNE (p < 0.05). Quality of recovery was improved till 1 month after surgery (p < 0.05). The addition of pain neuroscience education improved analgesic effect and quality of recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. It also helped reduce sensitization and catastrophic of acute surgical pain. This psychologically-oriented analgesic approach merits future research and application for these patients.

SCN10A gene polymorphism is associated with pain sensitivity and postoperative analgesic effects in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain intensity is influenced by various factors, including genetic variations. The SCN10A gene encodes the Nav1.8 sodium channel protein, which is crucial for pain signal transmission in peripheral sensory neurons.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the relationship between genetic mutations in the SCN10A gene (rs6795970) and postoperative analgesic effects following gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Two hundred female patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were included. pain sensitivity was evaluated using the catastrophizing scale and pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ). Patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and dexmedetomidine for 48 h post-surgery. Postoperative pain indicators, such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Ramsay scores, and side effects were recorded. SCN10A rs6795970 mutations were identified using MassARRAY SNP typing technology, and patients were categoried into homozygous mutant (AA), wild type (GG), and heterozygous mutation (GA) groups for analysis.

RESULTS

Patients in the AA group had higher scores on the pain Catastrophizing Scale, PSQ-total, PSQ-minor, and PSQ-moderate compared to GA and GG groups (P < 0.05). VAS scores at 4, 6, and 12 h post-operation were higher in the AA group than the GG group (P < 0.05). Ramsay scores were lower in AA patients at 2 and 4 h post-operation compared to GA and GG groups (P < 0.05). The AA group exhibited more self-control analgesic pump compressions within the first 24 h post-surgery, quicker depletion of analgesics in the pump, and lower patient satisfaction with pain relief compared to GA and GG groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients with homozygous SCN10A mutations may experience higher preoperative pain scores and increased sensitivity to postoperative pain following gynecological laparoscopic surgery with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.chictr.org.cn , registration number: ChiCTR2200062425.

Complex intervention including pain science education and patient-led goal setting-based self-management strategies for management of aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms: a single-arm feasibility and pilot study

PURPOSE

Up to 74% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) treated with aromatase inhibitor (AI) experience AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS). AIMSS is the predominant cause of poor adherence to AI therapy, yet no definitive treatment exists. The primary research objectives of this study were (1) to develop a novel BCS-specific complex intervention to alleviate AIMSS, and to assess its feasibility. The secondary research objective was (2) to assess the preliminary efficacy of this intervention.

METHODS

A single-arm, longitudinal pilot study was conducted involving 15 BCS with AIMSS. The complex intervention, which included pain science education, patient-led goal setting, and self-management strategies, was administered over 3 months. Feasibility was assessed by measuring overall participation, treatment completion rates, and satisfaction after 3 months of intervention. Additionally, the preliminary efficacy of the intervention was evaluated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with the change in pain intensity (brief pain inventory [BPI] worst pain/stiffness intensity) at 3 months as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The feasibility assessment showed promising results, with a 70.7% participation rate, an 83.3% intervention completion rate, and a satisfaction score of 8.2 ± 1.5. The intervention significantly reduced BPI worst pain/stiffness intensity by 2.78 points after 3 months (95% CI, - 4.5 to - 0.87, p < 0.01). Secondary outcomes demonstrated significant improvements in disability, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel complex intervention appears valuable for management AIMSS in BCS. Future large-scale studies, including randomized controlled trials, are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN-CTR: UMIN 000049035) in October 2022.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The novel BCS-specific complex intervention program holds the potential to aid in managing AIMSS, improving adherence to AI therapy, and enhancing their quality of life.

Effectiveness of an interactive online group intervention based on pain neuroscience education and graded exposure to movement in breast cancer survivors with chronic pain: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness, compared with usual care, of an interactive online group programme combining pain neuroscience education (PNE) and graded exposure to movement (GEM) for improving quality of life and pain experience in breast cancer survivors with chronic pain.

METHODS

This single-blind randomised controlled trial included a sample of 49 breast cancer survivors who were randomly assigned to two groups (experimental: n = 22 and control: n = 27). The experimental group received a 12-week person-centred online programme based on pain neuroscience education and therapeutic yoga as gradual exposure to movement, while the control group continued with their usual care. The primary outcome was quality of life (FACT-B + 4); the secondary outcomes were related to the experience of chronic pain (pain intensity, pain interference, catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, and fear avoidance behaviours). All variables were assessed at four time points (T0, baseline; T1, after PNE sessions; T2, after yoga sessions; T3, at 3-month follow-up). For data analysis, ANOVA (2 × 4) analysis of variance (95% CI) was used when outcomes were normally distributed. If not, within-group and between-group comparisons were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six participants were included in the analysis (control group, 22; experimental group, 14). A significant time * group effect was observed in favour of the experimental group regarding the global quality of life score (p = 0.010, ηp2 = 0.124). Significant differences in favour of the experimental group were observed for pain intensity, pain interference, catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy. These differences persisted at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

An online intervention based on PNE and GEM appears to be more effective than usual care for improving quality of life in breast cancer survivors with chronic pain, as a time per group interaction was reported. In addition, the intervention also significantly improved the participants' experience of chronic pain. However, due to the study limitations further research is needed. Trial record: NCT04965909 (26/06/2021).

Pain neuroscience education and therapeutic exercise for the treatment of sequelae in breast cancer survivors living with chronic pain: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer represents the most common type of malignant neoplasm worldwide. Advances in diagnosis and treatment have increased the life expectancy of patients. However, the sequelae associated with the treatment of the disease such as chronic pain, kinesiophobia and loss of physical function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) are a long-term health problem. Therapeutic strategies are required for the treatment of chronic sequelae in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education (PNE) and therapeutic exercise (TE) for the treatment of chronic sequelae in BCS.

METHODS

Quasi-experimental repeated measures study. The intervention lasted 9 weeks, with 3 educational and 24 exercise sessions. Pain frequency and intensity (VAS scale), neuropathic pain (DN4), kinesiophobia level (TSK-11V), central sensitization (CSI-Sp), functionality of the affected arm (ULFI-Sp) and active joint range (ROM) with goniometry were measured at baseline, 3rd, 6th and 9th week. Statistical analysis included Friedman's test and ANOVA according to normality criteria.

RESULTS

A total sample of 26 BCS participate in the study. Significant statistical changes were found from the 3rd week of treatment in the frequency and intensity of pain, kinesiophobia and neuropathic pain (p < 0.05). All variables had significant changes at the 9th week (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present investigation suggest that the combination of PNE and TE are effective in treating sequelae at short term in BCS with chronic pain.

Empowering beyond Pain: Pain Neuroscience Education Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivorship Care

Chronic pain is a common consequence of breast cancer (BC) and its treatments. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a non-pharmacological intervention that adopts a biopsychosocial approach and has already been proven to be effective for different chronic pain syndromes. The present review aims to critically assess clinical trials comparing the efficacy of PNE to traditional biomedical education (BME) in reducing BC-related pain and improving quality of life. We conducted a literature search in scientific databases, including all studies regarding PNE use specifically for BC-related pain. Ongoing randomized controlled and observational studies were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov and congress proceedings. A total of eight clinical trials met the review criteria. The participants were all administered physical therapy and assigned to receive either BME or PNE interventions. Among the completed clinical studies, one reported no statistically relevant differences between the two groups, whereas the other showed lower levels of pain-related indexes in the PNE population compared to the BME one. While the current literature is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of PNE for managing BC pain, we strongly support the need for further trials, as PNE could empower BC patients in both prevention of and coping with pain, offering the advantage of having no side effects.

Association of Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Musculoskeletal Symptoms with Central Sensitization-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction

Aromatase inhibitor (AI)-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) can decrease health-related quality of life and lead to discontinuation of AI therapy for postmenopausal women with breast cancer (BC). Although central sensitization (CS) may contribute to AIMSS, the relevance of CS-related symptoms to AIMSS has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between AIMSS and CS-related symptoms in women with BC who received AI therapy.

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited women who underwent BC surgery before at least 1 year and were taking AI for at least 6 months. Participants were assessed for joint pain and CS-related symptoms using the central sensitization inventory (CSI). The severity of CS-related symptoms was classified into three groups, and the prevalence of AIMSS was calculated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between AIMSS and factors of possible relevance to AIMSS, including CSI severity.

Results

Of the 73 women who were included in this study, 31 (42.4%) were categorized into the AIMSS group and 42 (57.6%) into the non-AIMSS group. Participants with a history of chemotherapy and higher CSI score were significantly more likely to have AIMSS. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a history of chemotherapy (odds ratio = 4.21) and higher CSI severity (odds ratio = 13.43) had significantly associated with AIMSS.

Conclusion

CS-related symptoms assessed using CSI may be strongly associated with AIMSS. Further longitudinal studies to investigate the causal relationship and effectiveness of CS-targeted interventions are needed to prevent and treat AIMSS effectively.

The Mediating Role of Pain Cognitions and Pain Sensitivity in the Treatment Effect of Perioperative Pain Neuroscience Education in People Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy

Though perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE) positively influences patients' surgical outcomes, little is known about the mechanisms behind this treatment's success. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the potential mediating role of pain cognitions and pain sensitivity in the treatment effect of PPNE on postoperative quality of life in people undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. This secondary analysis uses data from 120 participants of a randomized controlled trial who were randomized to receive either PPNE or perioperative biomedical education before undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Quality of life was assessed 1-year postsurgery using the short form 36-item health survey (SF36) physical and mental component scores. Potential mediators included pain cognitions (ie, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and hypervigilance) and pain sensitivity (ie, endogenous nociceptive modulation), assessed 6 weeks postsurgery. Mediation models were constructed using structural equation modeling, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using 10,000 bootstrap samples. Analyses show a significant total effect for PPNE (estimate = .464, 95% CI [.105, .825]) and a significant indirect effect via pain catastrophizing on the SF36 physical component (estimate = .124, 95% CI [.001, .293]). No mediating effect was found through the remaining pain cognitions or pain sensitivity measures. Also, no potential mediators were identified for the treatment effect of PPNE on the SF36 mental component. Our findings suggest that pain catastrophizing mediates the treatment effect of PPNE on physical health-related quality of life in people undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. PERSPECTIVE: This secondary analysis identified pain catastrophizing as a mediator for PPNE in people undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. More so, its findings indicate that this educational intervention can enhance the postoperative physical health-related quality of life of these patients by addressing their catastrophizing thoughts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02630732).

Empowerment, Pain Control, and Quality of Life Improvement in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients through Pain Neuroscience Education: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study Protocol (EMPOWER Trial)

The treatment of early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) has improved patients' prognosis but often leads to adverse events and sequelae affecting quality of life (QoL). Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is a promising non-pharmacological intervention in this field. Preliminary data have shown the beneficial effect of PNE in BC survivors. However, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding its optimal use in eTNBC. To address this issue, a prospective pilot study will enroll 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with eTNBC at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital. The PNE program will consist of 10 weekly sessions to be started within 4 weeks of the onset or worsening of a pain syndrome (PS). QoL, pain, and disability will be assessed before, during, at the end of, and 6 months after PNE using validated questionnaires. Peripheral venous blood samples will be taken before and at the end of PNE to evaluate inflammatory serum biomarker levels. The primary objective is to evaluate whether PNE leads to clinical improvement in QoL and pain. If successful, it will be validated in a larger multi-centric cohort, potentially leading to its widespread implementation as a standard pain management tool for eTNBC patients.

Pain Neuroscience Education in elective surgery patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) consists of an educational strategy that seeks to understand the biological processes of pain and how to control it. The main objective of this study will be to evaluate the impact of PNE on outcomes related to the postoperative period. The hypothesis is that the intervention may positively influence postoperative recovery, contributing to pain control, clinical indications, acceptance and consumption of analgesics and other pharmacological drugs that contribute to its control, as well as psychological aspects, such as anxiety, depression and pain catastrophising.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This will be an open, parallel, multicentre and randomised controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 participants aged between 18 and 59 years of age, of both genders, who are going to have elective general surgery will be evaluated. The intervention group will participate in a preoperative pain neuroscience educational session and also receive usual preoperative care, while the control group receives usual preoperative care as well. The educational session will last 30 min and consists of a video (5:20 min), a questionnaire about the content, time for participants to express their beliefs, thoughts and doubts. Participants will be evaluated preoperatively and there will be one postintervention evaluation. The intensity and characteristics of pain and anxiety are evaluated as primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, pain catastrophising and depression are taken into account.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Ceilandia, the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Strategic Health Management of the Federal District and the Research Council of the Hospital of Brasília-Rede Dasa (CAAE: 28572420.3.0000.8093). Recruitment began in June of 2023. All participants were included in the study only after their written consent. All data obtained will be analysed and distributed through publication in journals and at scientific events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) (RBR-23mr7yy).

Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education on somatosensory functioning after surgery for breast cancer: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Pain is one of the most prevalent and long-term adverse effects described by people who have undergone breast cancer surgery. Non-helpful perceptions and thoughts about pain may contribute to the transition of acute to persistent pain. Adding educational interventions to the current physical therapy program in this population may help to improve or prevent persistent pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a type of educational intervention that addresses the experience of pain in a broader sense by explaining pain not only from a biomedical perspective, but also from a psychological and social perspective. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) investigated whether PNE, in addition to a standard physiotherapy program immediately after surgery for breast cancer, was more effective on somatosensory functioning in the short (4 months postoperatively) and long term (18 months postoperatively), than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Somatosensory functioning was evaluated using a self-reported questionnaire as well as a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing evaluation. The findings of this study revealed that adding six sessions of PNE to a standard physical therapy program (n = 184) did not result in a significantly different course of somatosensory functioning up to 18 months postoperatively as compared to biomedical pain education. These findings provide an interesting basis for future research into who should receive PNE after surgery for breast cancer (e.g., patient profiling or phenotyping) and how we can tailor it to the individual to increase its effectiveness.

PaiNEd app. Assessing central sensitization in survivors of breast cancer: A reliability study

Introduction

Pain is a common adverse event in survivors of breast cancer (sBCs). As there is no gold standard to assess pain experience predominantly related to central sensitization (CS) symptoms, we designed the PaiNEd app, which includes an algorithm to report whether patients are under predominant CS pain mechanisms.

Objective

We aimed to assess the reliability of the PaiNEd app to estimate whether sBC pain experience is predominantly related to CS symptoms.

Methods

An observational, descriptive reliability design was employed to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability of the PaiNEd app. This app includes an algorithm that considers the number of painful body parts and some questionnaires related to pain, such as the Numeric Pain-Rating Scale, the Brief Pain Inventory, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI).

Results

A total of 21 sBCs with persistent pain were recruited. We observe a general trend of close agreement between the paper-based and app-based formats (ICCs ranged between 0.802 and 0.972; Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.797 and 0.971). Test-retest reliabilities were moderate to excellent (ICCs ranged between 0.510 and 0.941; Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.499 and 0.938). The agreement between the categorization of the CS algorithm and the CSI (cut-off point ≥ 40 for CS symptoms) was 95.24%.

Conclusion

The PaiNEd app emerges as a robust tool for evaluating pain experience predominantly related to CS and pain-related symptoms in sBCs. Its demonstrated reliability not only bolsters its utility but also signifies its potential as a valuable asset for healthcare professionals engaged in pain education programs.

Returning to Work After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pain neuroscience education compared to biomedical pain education after breast cancer surgery on (1) work status, (2) time until work resumption, and (3) change in return-to-work expectations up to 18 months post-surgery.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to either pain neuroscience education (intervention group) or biomedical pain education (control group) in addition to a standard physical therapy program after surgery for breast cancer. The first four months following surgery, one to two physiotherapy sessions and three educational sessions were scheduled. After, two educational sessions and two physiotherapy sessions were held at six and eight months postoperatively. All outcomes were assessed at four, six, eight, 12 and 18 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 12 months, in the intervention group, 71% of the women returned to work compared to 53% in the control group (18% points difference, 95%CI:-0.1 to 35;p = 0.07). At 18 months, the differences decreased to 9% points, 95%CI:-26 to 7;p = 0.35). Neither time until work resumption (p = 0.46) nor change in estimation of own ability to return to work up to 18 months postoperatively (p = 0.21) significantly differed between both groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found regarding return to work outcomes between women receiving pain neuroscience education versus biomedical pain education after breast cancer surgery. Further research is warranted to explore the potential role of pain neuroscience education in return-to-work interventions following breast cancer surgery.

A systematic review of the added value of perioperative pain neuroscience education

OBJECTIVE

To identify and summarize evidence about the benefits of perioperative pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain-related and psychosocial outcomes.

METHODS

Included were reports written in English that carried out PNE or its synonyms; perioperative period; aged ≥ 18 years; interventional studies and observational studies. Secondary studies, conference abstracts, and editorials were excluded. There was no time limitation.

INFORMATION SOURCES

PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. Search: June 20th 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, and synthesis followed the recommendations of the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline. Register: Center for Open Science website (10.17605/OSF.IO/ZTNEJ).

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 18 reports. For pain outcomes, it was not possible to attribute PNE benefits because ten reports found improvements in both intervention and control groups. For psychosocial outcomes, fourteen reports found benefits for PNE groups. All the analyzed reports showed low risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

PNE had additional benefits beyond those obtained with conventional treatment for psychosocial outcomes.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Due to the lack of evidence, it was not possible to indicate the clinical use of PNE. It is suggested that further studies are needed aimed at clarifying the possible benefits.

The effect of implementation of pain neuroscience education and rehabilitation exercise on post-operative pain and recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSES

To optimize the efficacy of analgesia and post-operative recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery by integrating a composite psycho-somatic analgesia algorithm involving peri-operative rehabilitation exercise and pain neuroscience education into multi-modal analgesia.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare conventional peri-operative analgesia (group CA) and the addition of rehabilitation exercise and pain neuroscience education into it (group REPNE) for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Acute and chronic post-operative pain, characteristics of pain (pain catastrophizing, sensitization, and trends of neuropathic transformation), and quality of post-operative recovery calibrated with EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) were investigated and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients consented to participate in this study. Compared with those receiving conventional analgesia (group CA, N = 89), patients in group REPNE (N = 86) reported reduced intensity of pain 24 h after surgery, less risk of pain catastrophizing and sensitization, and better quality of life during hospitalization recovery till 1 month after surgery (p < 0.05). No statistical difference was found for neuropathic transformation of post-operative pain or for the incidence of chronic post-operative pain (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of peri-operative rehabilitation exercise and pain neuroscience education into multi-modal analgesia provided better analgesic effect compared with routine practice for patients receiving laparoscopic colorectal surgery and also facilitated better post-operative recovery. This composite psycho-somatic algorithm for peri-operative analgesia merits further application in clinical practice.

NEUROCANTRIAL: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a pain neuroscience education programme in adults with cancer pain

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the second most frequent symptom reported in patients with cancer among the main reasons for consultation. The incorporation of educational modalities in pain intervention processes has been suggested. This study aims to examine the efficacy of neuroscience pain education (PNE) in relation to pain, biopsychosocial variables and functional capacity in comparison with conventional treatment. It is hypothesised that an intervention based on PNE achieves better outcomes than conventional management, in terms of pain, biopsychosocial variables and functional capacity in adults with oncological pain.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This will be a single-blind, controlled clinical trial in which two groups will be compared using changes in pain as the primary measure. The first group will receive conventional treatment in addition to PNE, and participants will undergo an intervention of nine sessions (one session per week, for a total of 9 weeks), each lasting 30-40 min. Specifically, these sessions will teach biophysiological elements using metaphors that allow the adoption of these concepts related to pain. The second group will receive conventional treatment (pharmacological treatment). For this study, a sample size calculation was made based on the background, where 80 adults with oncological pain were required. An initial evaluation will be made to establish the baseline characteristics, and then, according to the randomisation, the assignment to the PNE group or the control group will be made and the two groups will be summoned again. Ten weeks later, for the intervention evaluation, the statistical analysis plan will be established by protocol and by intention-to-treat.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol complies with all ethical considerations. The authors commit to presenting the study's results. This study was approved by the ethics committees of the Universidad Santiago de Cali, Clínica de Occidente/Angiografía de Occidente. The authors commit to presenting the study's results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05581784.

Persistent pain management in an oncology population through pain neuroscience education, a multimodal program: PaiNEd randomized clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Pain is one of the most persistent symptoms after cancer treatment. The central nervous system can erroneously stay in its alarm phase, altering the pain experience of patients who have cancer. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) with multimodal approaches may benefit these patients.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol aims to determine the effectiveness of a PNE tool on pain, physical function and quality of life, as a supplement to a multimodal rehabilitation (MR) program in patients who had breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

An 8-week double-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted, including 72 participants who had BC and who have persistent pain, randomized into three groups: PNE program + MR program, traditional biomedical information + MR program and control group. The PNE program will include educational content that participants will learn through a mobile app and the MR program will include a concurrent exercise program and manual therapy. The primary outcome will be the perceived pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and secondary outcomes are others related to pain, physical function and quality of life. All outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, at the end of the intervention and 6 months after the end of intervention.

DISCUSSION

The proposed study may help BC patients with persistent pain improve their pain experience, quality of life and provide for more adaptive pain-coping strategies. This protocol could propose an action guide to implement different integral approaches for the treatment of sequelae. This treatment option could be offered to this patient profile and it could be easily implemented in the healthcare systems due to its low costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04877860. (February18, 2022).

Central Sensitization in Cancer Survivors and Its Clinical Implications: State of the Art

Although the prevalence of cancer pain is 47% after treatment, cancer pain is often underestimated, and many patients are undertreated. The complexity of cancer pain contributes to the lack of its management. Recently, as the mechanism of cancer pain, it has become clear that central sensitization (CS) influences chronic pain conditions and the transition from acute to chronic pain. In this state-of-the-art review, we summarized the association of CS or central sensitivity syndrome with pain and the treatment for pain targeting CS in cancer survivors. The management of patients with CS should not only focus on tissue damage in either the affected body regions or within the central nervous system; rather, it should aim to target the underlying factors that sustain the CS process. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is gaining popularity for managing chronic musculoskeletal pain and could be effective for pain and CS in breast cancer survivors. However, there is a study that did not demonstrate significant improvements after PNE, so further research is needed. Precision medicine involves the classification of patients into subgroups based on a multifaceted evaluation of disease and the implementation of treatment tailored to the characteristics of each patient, which may play a central role in the treatment of CS.

Effect of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, and emotional functioning: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial)

ABSTRACT

Pain is one of the most common and long-lasting side effects reported by women surgically treated for breast cancer. Educational interventions may optimize the current physical therapy modalities for pain prevention or relief in this population. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an educational intervention that explains the pain experience not only from a biomedical perspective but also the psychological and social factors that contribute to it. Through a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) it was investigated if PNE, in addition to the standard physiotherapy program immediately after breast cancer surgery, was more effective over the course of 18 months postoperatively than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Primary outcome was the change in pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index, 0-70) over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in pain intensity, upper limb function, physical activity level, and emotional functioning over 4, 6, 8, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear models for repeated (longitudinal) measures were used to compare changes. Preoperative and postoperative moderators of the change in pain-related disability were also explored. Of 184 participants randomized, the mean (SD) age in the PNE and biomedical education group was 55.4 (11.5) and 55.2 (11.4) years, respectively. The change in pain-related disability from baseline to 12 months postoperatively did not differ between the 2 groups (PNE 4.22 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-7.03], biomedical 5.53 [95% CI: 2.74-8.32], difference in change -1.31 [95% CI: -5.28 to 2.65], P = 0.516). Similar results were observed for all secondary outcomes. Future research should explore whether a more patient-tailored intervention would yield better results.

Exploring women's experiences with persistent pain and pain management following breast cancer treatment: A qualitative study

This qualitative study aimed to explore experiences of women with persistent pain following breast cancer treatment, including their perceptions about the cause of their pain, how they manage their pain and their interactions with healthcare providers related to their pain during and following breast cancer treatment. Fourteen women who experienced pain for more than 3 months following breast cancer treatment were recruited from the general breast cancer survivorship community. Focus groups and in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted by one interviewer, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and analysed using Framework Analysis. Three main descriptive themes emerged from the interview transcripts: (1) characteristics of pain, (2) interactions with healthcare providers and (3) pain management. Women had various types and degrees of persistent pain, all of which they believed were related to breast cancer treatment. Most felt like they were not given enough information pre- or post-treatment and believed their experience and ability to cope with pain would have been better if they were given accurate information and advice about (the possibility of) experiencing persistent pain. Pain management strategies ranged from trial and error approaches, to pharmacotherapy, and to 'just coping with the pain". These findings highlight the importance of the provision of empathetic supportive care before, during and after cancer treatment that can facilitate access to relevant information, multidisciplinary care teams (including allied health professionals) and consumer support.

Conservative interventions and clinical outcome measures used in the perioperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy is the first-line treatment approach for more than 90% of breast cancer patients. The numerous physical impairments associated with this surgical procedure negatively impact the patient's quality of life. To date, rehabilitation resources available for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy within the institutions affiliated to the Centre intégré universitaire de soins de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (CIUSSS-MCQ) are lacking and do not always seem to reflect the particularities of breast cancer care pathways. The purpose of this review was to identify and describe the conservative interventions and the clinical outcome measures used in the perioperative physical rehabilitation of women with breast cancer who are awaiting or have undergone mastectomy. We also aimed to report on the barriers and facilitators to study participation and completion.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2021, and we updated the search on July 11, 2022. We included peer-reviewed English and French literature with quantitative designs, describing conservative interventions and clinical outcome measures used within rehabilitation programs designed for women who were awaiting or had undergone mastectomy. Paired reviewers independently reviewed all citations and articles using a two-phase screening process and independently extracted the data.

RESULTS

Of the 6080 articles identified, 57 met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions were multimodal, which combined exercise with patient education, manual therapy, and/or lymphatic drainage. The most frequently used objective measures of physical function were shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, and signs of lymphedema. In contrast, the primary patient-reported outcome measures were quality of life, shoulder function, and pain. Undergoing another breast surgery, death, and cancer recurrence were the most reported barriers to study completion.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review reports on the heterogeneity and wide range of conservative interventions and clinical outcome measures used in the physical rehabilitation of breast cancer patients who had undergone or were scheduled to undergo mastectomy. Tailoring interventions to breast cancer patients' needs and promoting outpatient rehabilitation interventions appear to be better suited to the particularities of breast cancer care pathways. Further research is needed to better identify barriers and facilitators to study participation and completion.

Validity and reliability of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale in breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to carry out a psychometric analysis of the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS-Sp) in Spanish breast cancer survivors (BCS).

METHODS

A validation study was carried out in 154 BCS. Participants were recruited from the service of Medical Oncology of the University Clinical Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, in Málaga (Spain). A psychometric analysis of internal consistency, internal structure and convergent validity of the FACS-Sp was performed. Cronbach's alpha was calculated for internal consistency. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used to determine the internal structure of the FACS-Sp. Convergent validity with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The internal consistency was high (McDonald's ω = 0.91). The Exploratory Factor Analysis yielded one factor explaining the 40.80% of total variance. Convergent validity with the TSK and the PCS was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

The FACS-Sp has demonstrated to be a valid and reliable measure for assessing pain-related fear avoidance in BCS based on internal consistency, structural validity and convergent validity. Further studies that analyse other measurement properties in different Spanish cancer populations are needed.