An analysis of drug-induced liver injury, which showed histological findings similar to autoimmune hepatitis

Clinical presentation, causative drugs and outcome of patients with autoimmune features in two prospective DILI registries

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with autoimmune features is a liver condition with laboratory and histological characteristics similar to those of idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), which despite being increasingly reported, remains largely undefined. We aimed to describe in-depth the features of this entity in a large series of patients from two prospective DILI registries.

METHODS

DILI cases with autoimmune features collected in the Spanish DILI Registry and the Latin American DILI Network were compared with DILI patients without autoimmune features and with an independent cohort of patients with AIH.

RESULTS

Out of 1,426 patients with DILI, 33 cases with autoimmune features were identified. Female sex was more frequent in AIH patients than in the other groups (p = .001). DILI cases with autoimmune features had significantly longer time to onset (p < .001) and resolution time (p = .004) than those without autoimmune features. Interestingly, DILI patients with autoimmune features who relapsed exhibited significantly higher total bilirubin and transaminases at onset and absence of peripheral eosinophilia than those who did not relapse. The likelihood of relapse increased over time, from 17% at 6 months to 50% 4 years after biochemical normalization. Statins, nitrofurantoin and minocycline were the drugs most frequently associated with this phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

DILI with autoimmune features shows different clinical features than DILI patients lacking characteristics of autoimmunity. Higher transaminases and total bilirubin values with no eosinophilia at presentation increase the likelihood of relapse in DILI with autoimmune features. As the tendency to relapse increases over time, these patients will require long-term follow-up.

Advances in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Issues: New Clinical and Mechanistic Analysis Due to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method Use

Clinical and mechanistic considerations in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) remain challenging topics when they are derived from mere case narratives or iDILI cases without valid diagnosis. To overcome these issues, attempts should be made on pathogenetic aspects based on published clinical iDILI cases firmly diagnosed by the original RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) or the RUCAM version updated in 2016. Analysis of RUCAM-based iDILI cases allowed for evaluating immune and genetic data obtained from the serum and the liver of affected patients. For instance, strong evidence for immune reactions in the liver of patients with RUCAM-based iDILI was provided by the detection of serum anti-CYP 2E1 due to drugs like volatile anesthetics sevoflurane and desflurane, partially associated with the formation of trifluoroacetyl (TFA) halide as toxic intermediates that form protein adducts and may generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). This is accompanied by production of anti-TFA antibodies detected in the serum of these patients. Other RUCAM-based studies on serum ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies) and SMA (anti-smooth muscle antibodies) associated with AIDILI (autoimmune DILI) syn DIAIH (drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis) provide additional evidence of immunological reactions with monocytes as one of several promoting immune cells. In addition, in the blood plasma of patients, mediators like the cytokines IL-22, IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP), IL-6, IL-10, IL 12p70, IL-17A, IL-23, IP-10, or chemokines such as CD206 and sCD163 were found in DILI due to anti-tuberculosis drugs as ascertained by the prospective updated RUCAM, which scored a high causality. RUCAM-based analysis also provided compelling evidence of genetic factors such as HLA (human leucocyte antigen) alleles contributing to initiate iDILI by a few drugs. In conclusion, analysis of published RUCAM-based iDILI cases provided firm evidence of immune and genetic processes involved in iDILI caused by specific drugs.

Molecular Idiosyncratic Toxicology of Drugs in the Human Liver Compared with Animals: Basic Considerations

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in patients exposed to drugs at recommended doses that leads to idiosyncratic DILI and provides an excellent human model with well described clinical features, liver injury pattern, and diagnostic criteria, based on patients assessed for causality using RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as original method of 1993 or its update of 2016. Overall, 81,856 RUCAM based DILI cases have been published until mid of 2020, allowing now for an analysis of mechanistic issues of the disease. From selected DILI cases with verified diagnosis by using RUCAM, direct evidence was provided for the involvement of the innate and adapted immune system as well as genetic HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) genotypes. Direct evidence for a role of hepatic immune systems was substantiated by (1) the detection of anti-CYP (Cytochrome P450) isoforms in the plasma of affected patients, in line with the observation that 65% of the drugs most implicated in DILI are metabolized by a range of CYP isoforms, (2) the DIAIH (drug induced autoimmune hepatitis), a subgroup of idiosyncratic DILI, which is characterized by high RUCAM causality gradings and the detection of plasma antibodies such as positive serum anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), rarely also anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), (3) the effective treatment with glucocorticoids in part of an unselected RUCAM based DILI group, and (4) its rare association with the immune-triggered Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) caused by a small group of drugs. Direct evidence of a genetic basis of idiosyncratic DILI was shown by the association of several HLA genotypes for DILI caused by selected drugs. Finally, animal models of idiosyncratic DILI mimicking human immune and genetic features are not available and further search likely will be unsuccessful. In essence and based on cases of DILI with verified diagnosis using RUCAM for causality evaluation, there is now substantial direct evidence that immune mechanisms and genetics can account for idiosyncratic DILI by many but not all implicated drugs, which may help understand the mechanistic background of the disease and contribute to new approaches of therapy and prevention.

[Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated inflammatory liver disease with an uncertain cause. The diagnosis of AIH is based on the characteristic clinical and laboratory findings (elevated liver enzyme and hypergammaglobulinemia), the presence of characteristic autoantibodies, and compatible histological abnormalities. AIH lacks a signature diagnostic marker, and the diagnosis requires the exclusion of other diseases (viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, Wilson's disease, and hereditary hemochromatosis). Therefore, collaboration between the clinical physician, laboratory medicine experts, and pathologists is important for a diagnosis. In December 2022, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) clinical practice guidelines were established. This review article summarizes the diagnosis part of these guidelines.

Discontinuation of immunosuppression in patients with immune-mediated drug-induced liver injury or idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis: A case-control study

Background and Aim

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) may present with autoimmune features and require immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to reach biochemical response. Discontinuation of IST without hepatitis relapse may be more frequent in these patients as compared to patients with classical autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). We aimed to determine baseline characteristics and outcome of patients with immune-mediated drug induced liver injury (IMDILI) with particular emphasis on IST during follow-up.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients presenting at a tertiary care center between January 2005 and December 2019 either with IMDILI or with classical AIH, for whom full baseline characteristics and a close follow-up were available over a 12-month period.

Results

Overall, 31 patients (IMDILI n = 16, mean age 59 [34-74] years; AIH n = 15, mean age 47 [15-61] years) were included, showing similar biochemical, serological, and histological characteristics. Incriminating drugs in IMDILI patients were mostly represented by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and sartans. Initial corticosteroids combined with IST led to biochemical response in all patients. Compared to idiopathic AIH, more patients with IMDILI were weaned off corticosteroids at the end of follow-up (11/16 [68.7%] vs 4/15 [26.6%], P < 0.02). At 1 year of follow-up, more patients in the IMDILI group compared to the classical AIH group were off any type of IST (13/16 [81%] vs 15/15 [100%], P = 0.08).

Conclusions

Although presenting with similar baseline biochemical and histological characteristics as idiopathic AIH, patients with IMDILI may not require long-term IST.

Metabolomic profiling for drug-induced liver injury with autoantibodies

BACKGROUNDS

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is sometimes similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in serology and histology. Clinicians empirically screened DILI with significant autoimmune characteristics to implement clinical intervention. We tried to characterize DILI with autoantibodies by metabolomics.

METHODS

Untargeted metabolomics coupled with pattern recognition approaches were performed on sera samples including AIH (n = 59), DILI with autoantibodies (DILI^Ab+, n = 68), and DILI without autoantibodies (DILI^Ab-, n = 75). The differential metabolites and fingerprint metabolites between AIH and DILI^Ab- were screened by orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis and hierarchical clustering respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 388 annotated differential metabolites between AIH and DILI^Ab-, 74 fingerprint metabolites were screened. The eigenmetabolite compressed from the fingerprint possessed high discrimination efficacy (AUC:0.891; 95 %CI, 0.838-0.944). In the fingerprint-based PCA model, AIH and DILI^Ab- were separated into three regions: the "pure region" of AIH (Region 1), the "pure region" of DILI^Ab- (Region 3), the mixture region of AIH and DILI^Ab- (Region 2). After incorporated into the PCA model, DILI^Ab+ samples were distributed into the three regions, indicating that DILI^Ab+ samples had different etiological tendencies. Moreover, the fingerprint-based radar model verified the results of PCA model characterizing DILI^Ab+. Notably, the antibody titers of DILI^Ab+ in the three regions did not differ significantly, while the response rates for glucocorticoids were obviously different. The metabolic difference among DILI^Ab+ in different regions mainly lies in energy metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of metabolic signature, DILI^Ab+ may not be a community of same pathogenesis, including AIH-inclined parts. Which deserves further study.

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis: A minireview

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a specific phenotype of drug-induced liver injury that may lead to the devastating outcome of acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Drugs implicated in DIAIH include antimicrobials such as nitrofurantoin and minocycline, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins as well as anti-tumor necrosis agents. The clinical features of drug-induced liver injury are indistinguishable from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as both may have positive AIH-related autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G, as well as similar histopathological findings. In patients who show no clinical improvement, or there is progressive liver injury despite cessation of the suspected drug, a liver biopsy should be considered, whereby the presence of advance fibrosis on histology favors the diagnosis of idiopathic AIH. Empirical treatment with corticosteroids may be required in patients with non-resolving liver injury. A typical clinical scenario supportive of DIAIH includes a history of drug exposure with spontaneous resolution of liver injury after drug withdrawal and the absence of relapse after rapid steroid taper. In this article we report two cases of DIAIH secondary to Sorafenib and Atorvastatin along with a review of currently available literature. Early identification and treatment often lead to a favorable outcome in DIAIH.

Growth differentiation factor 15 as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic marker for autoimmune hepatitis

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has been reported to be associated with fibrosis and cancer in liver disease. Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is often difficult because of the lack of specific markers. We investigated whether GDF15 is useful for diagnosing AIH and determined its therapeutic effects. We enrolled 171 Japanese patients as follows: AIH (n = 45), hepatitis B (HB) (n = 17), hepatitis C (HC) (n = 15), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 20), and 74 healthy controls. Serum GDF15 levels were measured, and immunohistological analyses of GDF15 were performed using liver tissue of AIH patients. (1) GDF15 levels (pg/ml) were higher in AIH (1994.3 ± 1258.0) and HC (1568.0 ± 822.3) than in HB (953.2 ± 871.4), PBC (643.9 ± 247.0), and controls (475.3 ± 145.3) (p < 0.0001), as well as in cirrhosis patients (n = 31) than in non-cirrhosis patients (n = 66) (1926.6 ± 1026.0 vs. 1249.1 ± 1124.1, p < 0.0001). In non-cirrhosis patients, GDF15 levels were higher in AIH (1914.0 ± 1327.2) than in HC (955.7 ± 502.7), HB (519.3 ± 197.5), and PBC (643.9 ± 247.0) (p < 0.0001). (2) GDF15 was positively correlated with M2BPGi (r = 0.7728), total bilirubin (r = 0.6231), and PT-INR (r = 0.6332). (3) GDF15 levels could be used to distinguish AIH from other liver diseases in non-cirrhosis patients, with an area under the curve of 0.9373 (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 79.3%, cut-off value 931.3). (4) GDF15 in AIH decreased after treatment. (5) Immunohistological analyses in AIH liver tissues revealed that GDF15 was strongly expressed in inflammatory cells, hepatic cytoplasm, and sinusoidal endothelial cells, but decreased after treatment. GDF15 is a novel diagnostic marker for AIH and is also expected to be a therapeutic marker for AIH.Clinical Trials Registration: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Kurume University (Approval No.: 19049).

Corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin therapy for chronic drug- or herb-induced liver injury achieves biochemical and histological improvements: a randomised open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of chronic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or herb-induced liver injury(HILI) is an important and unresolved challenge. There is no consensus regarding the indications for corticosteroids for chronic DILI/HILI.

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin for patients with chronic DILI/HILI.

METHODS

This was a randomised open-label trial. Eligible patients with causality assessment using the updated RUCAM were randomly assigned (1:1) either to the steroid treatment group (48-week stepwise dose reduction of methylprednisolone plus glycyrrhizin) or control group (glycyrrhizin alone). Liver biopsies were performed at baseline and at the end of the 48-week treatment period. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained biochemical response (SBR). The secondary outcomes were improvement in liver histology, time to biochemical normalisation and safety.

RESULTS

Of 80 participants, 70 (87.5%) completed the trial. The patients were predominantly female (77.5%), aged >40 years (77.5%) and had a hepatocellular injury pattern of DILI (71.2%). Compared to the control group, the treatment group showed a higher proportion of SBR (94.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.023), shorter biochemical normalisation time and histological improvements in both histological activity and fibrosis. The DILI and HILI subgroups, as well as the autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)-like DILI and non-AIH-like subgroups, showed comparable responses. No severe adverse events were observed during the trial.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first clinical evidence that corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin therapy for chronic DILI with or without AIH-like features can achieve both biochemical response and histological improvements with good safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02651350).

Chronic Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Updates and Future Challenges

Chronic drug-induced liver injury (DILI), defined as DILI with persistent liver injury more than one year after the first onset by the latest European guidelines, is a notable challenge globally with big issues of defining causality and establishing effective treatment. About 20% of patients with DILI develop into chronic DILI. Chronic DILI manifests as persistent or repeated inflammatory or diminishing bile ducts, even progresses to cirrhosis and needs liver transplantation eventually. However, research on chronic DILI over the last decades is still lacking, and the incidence, phenotypes, mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment have not been fully understood. In this paper, we reviewed the definition of chronic DILI, updated clinical studies in terms of incidence, special manifestations, and promising risk factors of chronic DILI, along with the recent progress and challenges in glucocorticoid therapy.

Herb-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis associated with Xiang-tian-guo (Swietenia macrophylla seeds): A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has a relatively low incidence, whereas the incidence of herb-induced liver injury (HILI) is still under investigation. As a special type of DILI, the diagnosis of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis presents a persistent challenge, because this condition has partial characteristics of both DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), such as a certain history of medication use and histology that similar is to AIH. Thus, the differential diagnosis between DILI and AIH can be confusing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 67-year-old woman taking xiang-tian-guo for 6 months was admitted to our hospital with a complaint of experiencing jaundice for 2 weeks.

DIAGNOSIS

A liver biopsy exhibited interface inflammation, foam cells, and "rosette" -like hepatocytes. She was diagnosed with herb-induced liver injury (hepatocellular and acute), a RUCAM score of 7 (probable), a severity for grade 4 liver injury, and accompanied autoimmune-like changes.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was instructed to cease the administration of suspicious drugs. The patient also received liver protection and albumin transfusion.

OUTCOMES

After 25 days of hospitalization, the patients aminotransferase levels returned to normal. No recurrence was observed after the administration of the treatments and a close follow-up.

LESSONS

We must to be vigilant about the safety of xiang-tian-guo as a herbal medicine. When faced with the difficulty of distinguishing between AIH and DILI, long-term follow-up observations for recurrence can aid clinicians in making a judgment.

Recent Advances in the Histopathology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is constantly changing as new drugs are approved and as new herbals and dietary supplements (HDS) reach the market. The pathologist plays a key role in the evaluation of DILI by classifying and interpreting the histologic findings considering patients' medical history and drug exposure. The liver biopsy findings may suggest alternative explanations of the injury and additional testing that should be performed to exclude non-DILI causes. Recent reports of iatrogenic liver injury are reviewed with attention to immunomodulatory and antineoplastic agents as well as reports of injury associated with HDS use.

Differential characteristics in drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is an adverse effect associated with several drugs that usually occurs acutely, with variable latency, and it may potentially be mortal. There are a few reports and studies about DIAIH.

METHODS

This was an analytical study of a retrospective cohort of patients, discriminated according to idiopathic or drug-induced etiology, followed up for a 7-year period until 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were selected for the analysis, 12 (6.3%) with DIAIH. The two main drugs related to DIAIH were nitrofurantoin, n = 8 (67%), and NSAID, n = 2 (17%), constituting 84% of the cases. There were no significant differences in seropositivity between AIH with DIAIH in antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA) antibodies, with 82.6% versus 82.6% and 34% versus 16%, respectively. The fibrosis stages were similar, except for the F4 stage, in a greater proportion in AIH. None of the patients with DIAIH had cirrhosis or developed it during follow-up, but it was present in 42.1% of the AIH cases at diagnosis (P = 0.003). Biochemical remission with management was higher in DIAIH but not significant (91.7% vs 80.9%, P = 0.35). The definitive interruption of immunosuppression was successfully performed in 25% of those with DIAIH without relapses but was only possible in 2.8% in AIH (P < 0.001) with 32 cases of relapses.

CONCLUSION

DIAIH constitutes a minor proportion of AIH. The clinical and histological characteristics may be similar; DIAIH patients have a greater chance of having treatment suspended with a low risk of relapse, progression to cirrhosis, or need for liver transplant.

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis: a multicentre study with detailed histological evaluation in a large cohort of patients

AIMS

Although liver biopsy is crucial to diagnose and guide treatment decisions, a detailed histological analysis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) with clinically acute presentations has not yet been performed. This study aimed to characterise the histological features and explore potential histological hallmarks to diagnose the acute presentation of AIH.

METHODS

We systematically evaluated liver specimens of 87 adult patients with acute presentation of AIH retrospectively enrolled from Japanese multicentre facilities. Each histological feature was predefined by consensus based on the diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Key findings were that acute presentation of AIH revealed histological features of both acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis accompanying various degrees of fibrosis. The prominent features were lobular necrosis/inflammation (97.7%), plasma cell infiltration (96.4%), emperipolesis (89.3%), pigmented macrophages (84.5%), cobblestone appearance of hepatocytes (82.6%) and perivenular necroinflammatory activity, including centrilobular necrosis (81.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The acute presentation of AIH represents the entire histological spectrum of acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis with various activity grades and fibrosis stages that clinically correspond to acute-onset AIH and acute exacerbation of classic AIH, respectively. Although there are no pathognomonic features for the pathological diagnosis, the prominent presence of lobular and perivenular necroinflammatory activity, pigmented macrophages and cobblestone appearance of hepatocytes in addition to the classic AIH features, such as plasma cell infiltration and emperipolesis, are useful for the pathological diagnosis of the acute presentation of AIH.

Similarities and Differences in Autoimmune Hepatitis Epidemiology between East and West: Autoimmune Hepatitis in East Asia, Southeast Asia, and South Asia

Background

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare disease that can develop regardless of age or ethnicity. However, its clinical features differ between eastern and western populations due to several heterogeneous genetic and environmental factors. We herein report the clinical characteristics of AIH patients in East Asia, Southeast Asia, and South Asia.

Summary and Key Messages

The prevalence of AIH in eastern countries is considered to be lower than in western countries. Although a few young patients with type 2 AIH have been observed in South Asia, most patients in Asia are middle-aged women with type 1 AIH who respond well to steroid-based immunosuppressive therapy. Human leukocyte antigen DR4 is suggested to be an influential factor in the genetic background of AIH patients in Asia, particularly in East Asia. Notably, AIH may be induced by some societal- or culture-associated medicines, including herbal medicines. The IAIHG (International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group) scoring systems are generally accepted as the standard diagnostic methods for AIH in Asian countries. The results of repeated nationwide surveys in Japan suggest that the clinical features of AIH patients in East Asia are changing, with IgG levels and rates of anti-nuclear antibody positivity decreasing.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Associated with Complementary and Alternative Medicines

A 24-year-old man was admitted due to acute hepatitis with unknown etiology. After his condition and laboratory data gradually improved with conservative therapy, he was discharged 1 month later. Two months after his discharge, however, liver dysfunction reappeared. After his mother accidentally revealed that he took complementary and alternative medicine, discontinuation of the therapy caused his condition to improve. Finally, he was diagnosed with a recurrent drug-induced liver injury associated with Japanese complementary and alternative medicine. It is important to take the medical history in detail and consider complementary and alternative medicine as a cause of liver disease.

Beneficial effect of corticosteroids for patients with severe drug-induced liver injury

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of corticosteroids in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether corticosteroids were beneficial for severe DILI.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with DILI enrolled between January 2010 and May 2015.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients enrolled, 53 were treated with corticosteroids. The baseline characteristics of patients received corticosteroids were more severe than that of the non-corticosteroid group. Subgroup analyses indicated that almost all patients who died had the higher 50% quartile of total bilirubin (TB) levels. Among the 50-75% quartile of TB level, no patient in the corticosteroids group but 3 (15.0%) of 20 patients in the non-corticosteroid group died (P = 0.261). With the highest 25% quartile of TB level, four patients in the corticosteroids group and four in the non-corticosteroids group died (P = 0.405). Corticosteroid therapy improved the recovery rate from 77.4% to 87.9% in the higher 50% quartile of TB values (P = 0.331). More interestingly, corticosteroid administration hastened the resolution of liver injury by shortening the duration of peak TB to 50% reduction from 17 to 12 days (P < 0.05). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that the TB levels and cholestatic injury type were the two independent factors associated with a poor outcome of DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids are not detrimental to DILI, but instead ameliorate liver injury and improve patient survival. Short-time use of corticosteroids is strongly recommended for severe DILI patients with hyperbilirubinemia.

Autoimmune hepatitis following drug-induced liver injury in an elderly patient

We describe a case of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) that may have occurred following drug-induced liver injury with camostat mesilate and/or benzbromarone in an elderly patient. The patient's liver biopsy showed chronic active hepatitis and autoimmune hepatitis. Stopping the use of these drugs did not lead to complete remission, but the use of a low dose of corticosteroids completely cured his liver dysfunction. In the present case, liver dysfunction was caused by an autoimmune mechanism. Special attention should be paid to idiopathic AIH and drug-induced AIH in elderly patients.