Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to global spine balance: based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults

A Novel Cervical Sagittal Classification for Asymptomatic Population Based on Cluster Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To propose a novel cervical sagittal classification for asymptomatic people so as to deepen the understanding of cervical sagittal alignment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spine sagittal morphology varies in people. There is a lack of widely-accepted cervical sagittal classification method.

METHODS

In all, 183 asymptomatic subjects were included. A series of global and segmental cervical sagittal parameters were measured. Subjects with cervical lordosis (CL)<0 degrees were incorporated directly into the kyphosis (K) group. For subjects with CL ≥0 degrees, a two-step cluster analysis was used to arrive at the optimal number of clusters. The results of the expressions for the subtypes were derived by graphing. The 60 randomly selected lateral cervical spine films were evaluated by 4 spine surgeons at 4-week intervals using our classification method, the Toyama classification method and the Donk classification method. The 3 classification methods' reliability was expressed by the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), and convenience was expressed by the measuring time. Finally, the distribution of 4 subtypes was depicted, and sagittal parameters were compared among subtypes.

RESULTS

Four subtypes of the cervical spine were suggested: Large lordosis (LL): CL≥-1.5×T1 slope (TS)+70°; Small lordosis (SL): -1.5×TS+50°≤CL<-1.5×TS+70°; Straight (S): 0°≤CL<-1.5×TS+50°; and K: CL<0°. The measuring time for our classification method was significantly less than the Toyama classification method ( P <0.001). Our classification method showed high inter-observer reliability (ICC=0.856) and high to excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC between 0.851 and 0.913). SL was the most common type (37.7%). Men had more LL type and women had more S type and K type. The proportion of S and K increased with age. Cervical sagittal parameters were significantly different among the subtypes except for C4 vertebral body (VB) angle ( P =0.546), C2-C7 SVA ( P =0.628) and NT ( P =0.816).

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a novel cervical sagittal classification for an asymptomatic population, which proved to be simple to implement with satisfactory reliability.

Early radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anatomic versus lordotic cages

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) interbody implants are shaped anatomically, with a convex superior aspect, or lordotically, with an angle and flat surfaces. However, the effect of implant shape on cervical sagittal balance (CSB) is not well described.

Methods

Of the 192 cases reviewed from 2018 to 2019, 118 were included with matching pre- and postoperative imaging. Cases were categorized by interbody implant type (anatomic or lordotic) and number of levels fused (1-level, 2-level, etc.). SurgiMap was used to measure cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) on pre- and postoperative imaging. Pre- and postoperative parameters were compared within and between each cohort. Change in CL (ΔCL), cSVA (ΔcSVA), and T1S-CL (ΔT1S-CL) were calculated as the difference between pre- and postoperative values and were compared accordingly (1) anatomic versus lordotic and (2) 1-level versus 2-level versus 3-level fusion.

Results

Thirty-nine (33.1%), 57 (48.3%), and 22 (18.6%) cases comprised the anatomic, lordotic, and mixed (anatomic and lordotic) groups, respectively. ACDFs improved CL and T1S-CL by 5.71° (p<.001) and 3.32° (p<.01), respectively. CL was improved in the lordotic (5.27°; p<.01) and anatomic (4.57°; p<.01) groups, while only the lordotic group demonstrated improvement in T1S-CL (3.4°; p=.02). There were no differences in ΔCL (p=.70), ΔcSVA (p=.89), or ΔT1S-CL (p=.1) between the groups. Two- and 3-level fusions improved CL by 7.48° (p<.01) and 9.62° (p<.01), and T1S-CL by 4.43° (p<.01) and 5.96° (p<.01), respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, ACDFs significantly improved CL and T1S-CL however, there were no differences in CSB correction between the anatomic and lordotic groups. Two- and 3-level fusions more effectively improved CL (vs. single-level) and T1S-CL (vs. 3-level). These results suggest that implants should continue to be personalized to the patient's anatomy, however, future research is needed to validate these findings and incorporate the effects of preoperative deformities.

C4 constant vertebra: a novel benchmark of physiological cervical sagittal alignment

BACKGROUND

Cervical sagittal alignment is essential, and there is considerable debate as to what constitutes physiological sagittal alignment. The purpose of this study was to identify constant parameters for characterizing cervical sagittal alignment under physiological conditions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which asymptomatic subjects were recruited to undergo lateral cervical spine radiographs. Each subject was classified according to three authoritative cervical sagittal morphology classifications, followed by the evaluation of variations in radiological parameters across morphotypes. Moreover, the correlations among cervical sagittal parameters, age, and cervicothoracic junction parameters were also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 183 asymptomatic Chinese subjects were enrolled with a mean age of 48.4 years. Subjects with various cervical sagittal morphologies had comparable C4 endplate slope angles under all three different typing systems. Among patients of different ages, C2-C4 endplate slope angles remained constant. Regarding the cervicothoracic junction parameters, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle affected cervical sagittal parameters, including cervical lordosis and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and were correlated with the endplate slope angles of C5 and below and did not affect the endplate slope angles of C4 and above. In general, the slope of the C4 inferior endplate ranges between 13° and 15° under different physiological conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the asymptomatic population, the C4 vertebral body maintains a constant slope angle under physiological conditions. The novel concept of C4 as a constant vertebra would provide a vital benchmark for diagnosing pathological sagittal alignment abnormalities and planning the surgical reconstruction of cervical lordosis.

Radiographic Predictors of Subaxial Subluxation After Atlantoaxial Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify preoperative radiographic predictors associated with the development of subaxial subluxation (SAS) after surgery.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of atlantoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability has been increasing. SAS can develop after surgery despite atlantoaxial fusion with the optimal C1-C2 angle. We hypothesized that preoperative discordant angular contribution in the upper and subaxial cervical spine is associated with the occurrence of postoperative SAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for atlantoaxial instability with a minimum 5-year follow-up and control participants were included. The O-C2 angle, C2 slope (C2S), C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope (T1S) were measured. We focused on the angular contribution ratio in the upper cervical spine to the whole CL, and the preoperative C2/T1S ratio was defined as the ratio of C2S to T1S.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (SAS=11, no-SAS=16; mean age, 60.7 y old; 77.8% female; mean follow-up duration, 6.8 y) and 23 demographically matched control participants were enrolled. The SAS onset was at 4.7 postoperative years. Preoperatively, the O-C2 angle, C2-C7 CL, and T1S were comparable between the SAS, no-SAS, and control groups. The preoperative C2S and C2/T1S ratio were smaller in the SAS group than in the no-SAS or control group (C2S, 11.0 vs. 18.4 vs. 18.7 degrees; C2/T1S ratio, 0.49 vs. 0.77 vs. 0.78, P <0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the C2/T1S ratio had higher specificity and similar sensitivity as a predictor of postoperative SAS than C2S (specificity: 0.90 vs. 0.87; sensitivity: 0.73 vs. 0.73). The estimated cutoff values of the C2S and C2/T1S ratio were 14 degrees and 0.58, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative C2/T1S ratio was closely associated with postoperative SAS. Patients with a C2/T1S ratio <0.58 were at a high risk of SAS after atlantoaxial fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Impact of C3 laminectomy on cervical sagittal alignment in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty and C3-C6 laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is a modified laminoplasty technique that can preserve the semispinalis cervicis muscle attached to the C2 spinous process. Several previous studies have shown that this technique can lead to better outcomes of postoperative axial neck pain and C2-C3 range of motion (ROM) than conventional cervical laminoplasty. However, there is still a lack of understanding of total and proportional postoperative cervical sagittal alignment outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A single-center, patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included consecutive 126 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who were scheduled for cervical laminoplasty from March 2017 to January 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were C2-C7 Cobb angle (CA) and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes measures included other clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters including segmental Cobb angle and presence of C2-C3 interlaminar fusion.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty group (LN group) or the C3-C6 laminoplasty group (LP group) at a 1:1 ratio. Laminoplasty was performed using a unilateral open-door technique and stabilized with titanium mini plates. A linear mixed model analysis was employed to examine the longitudinal data from postoperative 1-year through 3-year. Additional analysis between three types of cervical sagittal alignment morphology was done.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients who were randomly allocated to one of two groups (LN group, n=61; LP group, n=61), modified intent-to-treat analysis was done for 109 patients (LN group, n=51, LP group, n=58) who had available at least a year of postoperative data. Postoperative C2-C7 CA was not significantly different between the two groups. However, NDI was significantly different between the two groups (12.8±1.0 in the LN group vs 8.6±1.0 in LP group, p=.005), which exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The postoperative C2-C3 CA was significantly greater in the LN group (7.1±0.5° in LN group vs 3.2±0.5° in LP group, p<.001) while C4-C7 CA was significantly smaller in the LN group (3.9±0.8° in LN group vs 7.7±0.7° in LP group, p<.001) with greater cSVA in the LN group (31.6±1.4 mm in LN group vs 25.5±1.3 mm in LP group at postoperative 3-year, p=.002). Postoperative Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), numerical rating scores for neck pain (NRS-N) were significantly better in the LP group than in the LN group (all p<.05) and only EQ-5D surpassed the MCID. The C2-C3 fusion rate was significantly different between the LN group (9.8%) and the LP group (44.8%) (p<.001). The LN group showed a higher prevalence of a specific cervical alignment morphology characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis (S curve). This S curve demonstrated significantly unfavorable outcomes across multiple outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

The impact of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative kyphosis among patients with CSM or OPLL did not significantly differ from that of C3-C6 laminoplasty. However, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty might result in an unfavorable clinical outcome with an unbalanced cervical sagittal alignment characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis.

Can C7 Slope Accurately Substitute for an Invisible T1 Slope According to Age and Cervical Morphology in Cervical Lateral Radiographs?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiologic study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify age-associated changes in T1 slope (T1S) and C7 slope (C7S), as well as the difference between T1S and C7S (△, which was defined as T1S minus C7S) and to explore the cervical morphology that C7S can be the most accurate alternative for the invisible T1S.

METHODS

625 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers received cervical lateral radiographs from August 2021 to May 2022. Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, C7S, and T1S were examined. Thereafter, the △ was established. The correlations among T1S, C7S, △ and other cervical sagittal parameters, and between age and other cervical sagittal parameters were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Then, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare variations in cervical sagittal parameters among volunteers aged 40 to 59 years, 60 to 64 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, and ≥75 years of age, and among volunteers with 1 lordotic morphology, 2 lordotic morphology, straight morphology, kyphotic morphology, 1 sigmoid morphology, and 2 sigmoid morphology. Linear regression modeling of the correlation between C7S and T1S in various cervical alignment patterns was then established.

RESULTS

△ had the strongest correlation with caudal arch (r = .646), and weakest correlation with cranial arch (r = -.082). Age was significantly correlated with T1S (r = .250), C7S (r = .244), and △ (r = .112). Among them, △ was stable until 74 years after which it showed an elevation from 3.3° in the group 70-74 years to 4.1° in the group over 75 years. Moreover, there was marked variation between T1S and C7S at 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns, but no difference was seen between T1S and C7S at kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a progressive increase in T1S, C7S, and △ with age. Linear regression equations for accurate prediction of T1S were developed based on the C7S in 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns. C7S may be a reliable proxy for T1S in kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: based on 625 Chinese asymptomatic subjects

PURPOSE

This work aimed to provide a comprehensive description of cervical alignment including cranial arch and caudal arch according to age, thus offering a reference database for cervical deformity treatment.

METHODS

Total 150 males and 475 females aged at 48-88 were enrolled from August 2021 to May 2022. Radiographic parameters were measured, including Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, T1-slope (T1s), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). Pearson correlation coefficient was employed in analyzing associations among sagittal parameters and between age and each parameter. Five groups were set according to different age stages, namely group with age 40-59 (N = 77), group with age 60-64 (N = 189), group with age 65-69 (N = 214), group with age 70-74 (N = 97), and group with age exceeding 75 (N = 48). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare multi-sets of cervical sagittal parameters (CSPs). Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used in assessing the relationships of various cervical alignment patterns with age groups.

RESULTS

T1s exhibited the strongest correlation with C2-7 (r = 0.655) and caudal arch (r = 0.561), and moderately correlated with cranial arch (r = 0.355). The positive correlations between age and C2-7 angle (r = 0.189, P < 0.001), cranial arch (r = 0.150, P < 0.001), caudal arch (r = 0.112, P = 0.005), T1s (r = 0.250, P < 0.001), as well as C2-7 SVA (r = 0.090, P = 0.024) were observed. Moreover, two progressive growths of C2-7 were shown after 60-64 and 70-74 years old, respectively. Thereof, cranial arch increased greatly after the age of 60-64, followed by a relative stability in the degeneration. The notable growth of caudal arch was observed after the age of 70-74, and the growth remained stable when exceeding the age of 75. The difference between cervical alignment patterns and age groups was obvious (Fisher's exact test P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This work explored in detail the normal reference values of cervical sagittal alignment including cranial arch and caudal arch under different age groups. Age-related changes in cervical alignment depended on the increase in the cranial and caudal arches in different proportions with age.