Abrogation of postprandial triglyceridemia with dual PPAR α/γ agonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Hypoglycemic Effects and Quality Marker Screening of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. at Different Growth Years

(1) Background: The effect of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. (D. nobile) on hyperglycemic syndrome has only been recently known for several years. Materials of D. nobile were always collected from the plants cultivated in various growth ages. However, regarding the efficacy of D. nobile on hyperglycemic syndrome, it was still unknown as to which cultivation age would be selected. On the other hand, with the lack of quality markers, it is difficult to control the quality of D. nobile to treat hyperglycemic syndrome. (2) Methods: The effects of D. nobile cultivated at year 1 and year 3 were checked on alloxan-induced diabetic mice while their body weight, diet, water intake, and urinary output were monitored. Moreover, levels of glycosylated serum protein and insulin were measured using Elisa kits. The constituents of D. nobile were identified and analyzed by using UPLC-Q/trap. Quality markers were screened out by integrating the data from UPLC-Q/trap into a network pharmacology model. (3) Results: The D. nobile cultivated at both year 1 and year 3 showed a significant effect on hyperglycemic syndrome at the high dosage level; however, regarding the significant level, D. nobile from year 1 showed the better effect. In D. nobile, most of the metabolites were identified as alkaloids and sesquiterpene glycosides. Alkaloids, represented by dendrobine, were enriched in D. nobile from year 1, while sesquiterpene glycosides were enriched in D. nobile from year 3. Twenty one metabolites were differentially expressed between D. nobile from year 1 and year 3. The aforementioned 21 metabolites were enriched to 34 therapeutic targets directly related to diabetes. (4) Conclusions: Regarding the therapy for hyperglycemic syndrome, D. nobile cultivated at year 1 was more recommended than that at year 3. Alkaloids were recommended to be used as markers to control the quality of D. nobile for hyperglycemic syndrome treatment.

Dual PPRαϒ Agonists for the Management of Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Saroglitazar is a novel medication for dyslipidemia, but its specific effects remain unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for managing dyslipidemia. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar with placebos for treating dyslipidemia. A random-effects model calculated the pooled mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study included seven RCTs involving 1975 patients. Overall, 340 (31.0%) and 513 (46.8%) participants received 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar, respectively; 242 (22.11%) received the placebo. The mean ages ranged from 40.2 to 62.6 years, and 436 (39.8%) were women. Compared to the control group, 4 mg of saroglitazar significantly decreased the triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels but did not affect the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Furthermore, the alanine aminotransferase level significantly decreased, the creatine level significantly increased, and body weight did not differ between the groups. Finally, 4 mg of saroglitazar, compared to 2 mg, significantly lowered the triglyceride level. Saroglitazar (4 mg) may be an effective treatment, but safety concerns remain.

Efficacy and Safety of Saroglitazar in Patients with Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The incidence of cardiometabolic diseases is increasing because of an increase in the standard of living. Currently, clinical treatment strategies for cardiometabolic diseases mainly focus on maintaining glycemic and lipid profiles. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in patients with metabolic disease and provide evidence for clinical decision making.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], and Google Scholar) for randomized controlled trials that examined saroglitazar for the treatment of patients with cardiometabolic disease. A total of seven randomized controlled trials were included for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.

RESULTS

The overall effect of saroglitazar showed significant changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, non-high-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels [MD: - 40.50; 95% CI - 58.09 to - 22.92; p < 0.00001; I² = 78%], [MD: - 7.49; 95% CI - 11.33 to - 3.65; p = 0.0001; I² = 41%], [MD: - 3.53; 95% CI - 6.91 to - 0.15; p = 0.04; I² = 19%], [MD: - 8.08; 95% CI - 15.63 to - 0.54; p = 0.04; I² = 58%], [MD: 2.04; 95% CI 0.17 to 3.92; p = 0.03; I² = 69%], [MD: - 6.10; 95% CI - 9.40 to - 2.80; p = 0.0003; I² = 65%], [MD: - 5.89; 95% CI - 7.50 to - 4.28; p < 0.00001; I² = 98%], and [MD: - 1.64; 95% CI - 2.83 to - 0.45; p = 0.007; I² = 95%], respectively. A subgroup analysis showed favorable outcomes with sarogiltazar 4 mg. There was a statistically non-significant reduced risk of adverse event occurrence in the saroglitazar treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results conclude that the overall effect of saroglitazar was beneficial only in terms of lipid profiles and liver function parameters, whereas saroglitazar 4 mg showed a better therapeutic role in maintaining lipid and glycemic parameters in patients with cardiometabolic disease.

Comparative analysis of the efficacies of probiotic supplementation and glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs (thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) in patients with type 2 diabetes from randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on the treatment effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs on glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure metabolism published between Jan 2015 and April 2021. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 25 RCTs (2,843 participants). Overall, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and TZD significantly reduce fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas GLP-1 RA increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. Multispecies probiotics decrease FBS, total cholesterol (TC), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Moreover, subgroup analyses indicated that participants aged >55 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, longer duration of intervention, and subjects from Eastern countries, showed significantly higher reduction in FBS and HbA1c, TC, TG and SBP. This meta-analysis revealed that including multiple probiotic rather than glucose-lowering drugs might be more beneficial regarding T2D prevention who suffering from simultaneously hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.

PPAR control of metabolism and cardiovascular functions

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα), PPARδ and PPARγ are transcription factors that regulate gene expression following ligand activation. PPARα increases cellular fatty acid uptake, esterification and trafficking, and regulates lipoprotein metabolism genes. PPARδ stimulates lipid and glucose utilization by increasing mitochondrial function and fatty acid desaturation pathways. By contrast, PPARγ promotes fatty acid uptake, triglyceride formation and storage in lipid droplets, thereby increasing insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. PPARs also exert antiatherogenic and anti-inflammatory effects on the vascular wall and immune cells. Clinically, PPARγ activation by glitazones and PPARα activation by fibrates reduce insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, respectively. PPARs are also physiological master switches in the heart, steering cardiac energy metabolism in cardiomyocytes, thereby affecting pathological heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Novel PPAR agonists in clinical development are providing new opportunities in the management of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: current status and treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is at the forefront of current research and treatment development programs. Despite extreme lowering of LDL-cholesterol there remains a high risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Recent large epidemiological, genomic wide association studies and Mendelian randomization studies have identified novel mechanisms and targets regulating TRL. This review will focus on recent and ongoing clinical trials that aim to reduce cardiovascular risk by decreasing plasma levels of TRL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ongoing efforts of basic and clinical scientist have described novel TRL regulating mechanism. The concentration on lifestyle changes is key to prevention and treatment guidelines. There is continue evidence that supports previous guidelines using fibrates alone and in combination with niacin to reduce TRLs, in special cases. The recent results from the REDUCE-IT study support the use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) for risk reduction and ASCVD, but recently presented data from the Long-Term Outcome Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk Reduction With Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia and Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Elderly Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction studies do not support the use of combination EPA/docosahexaenoic acid. The latter highlights the need for further studies into the pathways regulating ASCVD risk reduction after EPA administration. The identification of novel targets, such as apolipoprotein C3 and angiopoietin-like protein-3, are driving the development of novel treatments, and is the focus of this review.

SUMMARY

The current management of elevated triglyceride levels and the effect on cardiovascular outcomes is an emerging area of research. New data from fish oil studies suggest differences in EPA vs. EPA/docosahexaenoic acid cardio protection outcomes. The preliminary data from ongoing clinical trials of novel triglyceride-lowering therapeutics are promising. These programs will ultimately provide foundations for future triglyceride-lowering guidelines.

Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in managing hypertriglyceridemia in type-2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Saroglitazar is commonly used in India for managing hypertriglyceridemia in diabetes. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in hypertriglyceridemia.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving diabetes patients receiving saroglitazar in intervention arm, and placebo/lipid/diabetes medication in the control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate change in serum triglyceride and HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in other lipid parameters, glycaemia and adverse effects. Analysis for lipid and glycaemic parameters were done separately for controls receiving anti-lipid medications (statins/fibrates) [active control group (ACG)] and those receiving placebo/diabetes medications [passive control group (PCG)].

RESULTS

Following 12 weeks therapy, individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower triglycerides when compared to PCG [MD -71.67 mg/dl (95% CI: -123.67 to -19.66 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I² = 91% (considerable heterogeneity); low certainty of evidence (LCE)], but not ACG [MD -37.38 mg/dl (95% CI: -84.55-9.79 mg/dl; P = 0.12; I² = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. Individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower fasting glucose when compared to PCG [MD -24.61 mg/dl (95% CI: -44.13 to -5.09 mg/dl); P = 0.01; I² = 65% (moderate heterogeneity); LCE], but not ACG [MD -13.5 mg/dl (95% CI: -33.1-6.10 mg/dl; P = 0.18; I² = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein-B and HDL-C were not significantly different among study groups. Creatinine was significantly higher in patients receiving saroglitazar as compared to controls [MD 0.12 mg/dl (95% CI: 0.04-0.21 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I² = 29% (low heterogeneity); high certainty of evidence].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis reinforces the excellent triglyceride lowering of saroglitazar, but highlights significant increase in creatinine.

Triglyceride is independently correlated with insulin resistance and islet beta cell function: a study in population with different glucose and lipid metabolism states

BACKGROUND

Previous studies on the effects of lipotoxicity and oxidative stress on islet beta cell function mainly focused on patients with diabetes, whereas studies on normal glucose tolerance (NGT) are few. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships among triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), oxidative stress indicators, insulin resistance, and beta cell function in populations with different glucose and lipid metabolism states.

METHODS

A total of 517 individuals were recruited from a rural community in Beijing, China. Glucose metabolism status was defined according to the results of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Dyslipidemia was defined as abnormal TG, HDL-c, or LDL-c levels. The population was divided into four groups: individuals with normal glucose and lipid levels (group A, n = 62); those with dyslipidemia alone (group B, n = 82); those with dysglycemia alone (group C, n = 121); and those with dysglycemia and dyslipidemia (group D, n = 247). Oxidative stress indicators, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR) and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), were measured. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and glucose disposition index (DI₃₀, DI₁₂₀) were calculated to assess insulin resistance and islet beta cell function, respectively. Stratified multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore relationships between TG, HDL-c, LDL-c, oxidative stress indicators, and insulin resistance (natural log transformation of HOMA-IR, LnHOMA-IR) and beta cell function (natural log transformation of DI₃₀, Ln DI₃₀).

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, populations with dyslipidemia and/or dysglycemia showed significantly increased insulin resistance. Dyslipidemia aggravated insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction in individuals with dysglycemia. Stratified regression analysis showed that TG positively correlated with LnHOMA-IR in individuals with normal glucose levels (beta = 0.321, 0.327, P = 0.011, 0.003 in groups A and B, respectively) and negatively correlated with LnDI₃₀ in participants with dyslipidemia (beta = - 0.225, - 0.122, P = 0.035, 0.048 in groups B and D, respectively). Reduced serum SOD levels in individuals with dysglycemia plus dyslipidemia were observed, and a negative association between TG and SOD levels was found (r = - 0.461, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TG correlated with both insulin resistance and beta cell function in individuals with dyslipidemia alone. SOD negatively correlated with TG, indicating a close relationship between oxidative stress and glucose-lipid metabolism. Due to the adverse effect of hypertriglyceridemia on insulin sensitivity and islet beta cell function, more attention should be paid to the detection and management of hypertriglyceridemia.