Portal vein thrombi after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: its incidence and association with pouchitis

Surgical management of colon cancer in ulcerative colitis patients with orthotopic liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Colon cancer in ulcerative colitis patients with liver transplant (UCCOLT) due to primary sclerosing cholangitis carries significant treatment challenges. Aim of this literature search is to review management strategies and provide a framework to facilitate the decisional process in this clinical setting.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic search was followed by critical expert commentary of the results and development of a surgical management algorithm. Endpoints included surgical management, operative strategies, functional and survival outcomes. Technical and strategics aspects with particular regard to the choice of reconstruction were evaluated to tentatively develop an integrated algorithm.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting treatment of 20 UCCOLT patients were identified after screening. Nine patients underwent proctocolectomy and end-ileostomy (PC) and eleven had restorative ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Reported results for perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and graft loss were comparable for both procedures. There were no reports of subtotal colectomies and ileo-rectal anastomosis (IRA).

CONCLUSIONS

Literature in the field is scarce and decision-making is particularly complex. PC and IPAA have been reported with good results. Nevertheless, IRA may also be considered in UCCOLT patients in selected cases, reducing the risks of sepsis, OLT and pouch failure; furthermore, in young patients, it has the advantage of preserving fertility or sexual function. The proposed treatment algorithm may represent a valuable support in guiding surgical strategy.

Clinical approach to patients with an ileal pouch

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice to maintain intestinal continuity when a total proctocolectomy is a required. It is a technically challenging operation that may be burdened by several nuanced complications both in the immediate postoperative period and in the long term. Most patients with a pouch and any kind of complication will undergo radiological studies, thus multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiologists is paramount to their timely and accurate diagnosis. When treating pouch patients, radiologists should be familiar with regular pouch anatomy and its appearance in imaging studies, as well as with the most common complications that can occur in this population. In this review, we examine the clinical decision-making process at each step before and after pouch creation, as well as the most common complications associated with pouch surgery, their diagnosis, and their management.

Hepatobiliary manifestations following two-stages elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Hepatobiliary manifestations occur in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. The effect of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (LRP) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) on hepatobiliary manifestations is debated.

AIM

To evaluate hepatobiliary changes after two-stages elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with UC.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and June 2018, 167 patients with hepatobiliary symptoms underwent two-stage elective LRP for UC in a prospective observational study. Patients with UC and having at least one hepatobiliary manifestation who underwent LRP with IPAA were included in the study. The patients were followed up for four years to assess the outcomes of hepatobiliary manifestations.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 36 ± 8 years, and males predominated (67.1%). The most common hepatobiliary diagnostic method was liver biopsy (85.6%), followed by Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (63.5%), Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (62.5%), abdominal ultrasonography (35.9%), and Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (6%). The most common hepatobiliary symptom was Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (62.3%), followed by fatty liver (16.8%) and gallbladder stone (10.2%). 66.4% of patients showed a stable course after surgery. Progressive or regressive courses occurred in 16.8% of each. Mortality was 6%, and recurrence or progression of symptoms required surgery for 15%. Most PSC patients (87.5%) had a stable course, and only 12.5% became worse. Two-thirds (64.3%) of fatty liver patients showed a regressive course, while one-third (35.7%) showed a stable course. Survival rates were 98.8%, 97%, 95.8%, and 94% at 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo, and at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with UC who had LRP, there is a positive impact on hepatobiliary disease. It caused an improvement in PSC and fatty liver disease. The most prevalent unchanged course was PSC, while the most common improvement was fatty liver disease.

Association Between Portal Vein Thrombosis and Pouchitis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication in patients requiring colectomy ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with medically refractory ulcerative colitis or colitis-associated neoplasia. A previous small case series suggests associated between portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and ischemic pouchitis.

AIM

To evaluate the association between PVT and other demographic and clinical factors and pouchitis.

METHODS

We used Explorys Inc., a population-based database, to search medical records between 1999 and 2020 with SNOMED-CT code criteria for "construction of pouch" and "ileal pouchitis." Patients with pouchitis were compared to those with previous pouch construction without pouchitis. Factors associated with pouchitis identified with univariable analysis were introduced into a multivariable model. A post hoc analysis further stratified demographical findings of the association between PVT and pouchitis.

RESULTS

We identified 7900 patients with ileal pouchitis (7.5%) and 97,510 with pouch construction without pouchitis. In multivariate binary logistic regression, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the risk of pouchitis in patients with PVT was 10.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.04-16.49, P < 0.001). Other significant factors associated with pouchitis included male gender (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21, P = 0.018), deep vein thrombosis (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.72, P < 0.001), and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.45, P < 0.001). Smoking was a protective factor (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.33-0.36, P < 0.001). Further sub-analysis showed a higher prevalence of younger patients with PVT and pouchitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We report PVT as an independent risk factor associated with pouchitis. Our findings support that PVT is a potentially manageable perioperative complication, and intervention may reduce the risk of pouchitis.

Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.

Traumatic J-Pouch Perforation following a Blunt Abdominal Injury

A 46-year-old male was admitted to the trauma department after a motor vehicle accident. He presented with severe abdominal pain and a distended abdomen with peritonitis. His past surgical history included total proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis 20 years previously. Computed tomography showed free peritoneal air and fluid in the abdomen mandating an exploratory laparotomy. A perforation at the ileal J-pouch blind end was found. Primary closure with diverting loop ileostomy was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and underwent closure of the ileostomy two months later. The case and management are discussed after reviewing the literature.

High incidence of postoperative silent venous thromboembolism in ulcerative colitis: a retrospective observational study

Background

The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is high in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to analyze the incidence and predictive factors of postoperative VTE in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Methods

Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent colon and rectum surgery during 2010–2018 were included. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of postoperative VTE.

Results

A total of 140 colorectal surgery cases were included. Postoperative VTE was detected in 24 (17.1 %). Portal–mesenteric venous thrombosis was the most frequent VTE (18 cases; 75 %); of these, 15 patients underwent total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA). In univariate analysis, VTE occurred more frequently in patients with neoplasia than in those refractory to medications (27.2 % vs. 12.5 %; p < 0.031). TPC with IPAA was more often associated with VTE development (28 %) than total colectomy (10.5 %) or proctectomy (5.9 %). On logistic regression analysis, TPC with IPAA, total colectomy, long operation time (> 4 h), and high serum D-dimer level (> 5.3 µg/mL) on the day following surgery were identified as predictive risk factors.

Conclusions

Postoperative VTE occurred frequently and asymptomatically, especially after TPC with IPAA. Serum D-dimer level on the day after surgery may be a useful predictor of VTE.

Portal Vein Thrombosis following Total Colectomy due to Colonic Inertia: A Case Report and Evaluation of Risk Factors

The portal vein could be occluded by blood clots partially or completely causing portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The acute episode may be asymptomatic or manifested by abdominal pain, increasing body temperature, and unspecific dyspeptic symptoms. The main causes of PVT are categorized into local, acquired, and genetic thrombophilic factors. To our knowledge, this is the 2^nd recognized case of PVT  following colectomy for colonic inertia successfully treated with an effective anticoagulation therapy. The patient received unfractionated heparin as soon the diagnosis was implemented. The patient was a 34-year-old lady with chief complaint of severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia 10 days after the first hospital admission for subtotal colectomy due to colonic inertia. Spiral abdominal CT  scan with intravenous (IV) contrast showed thrombosis in main portal vein with its extension to right and left intrahepatic branches. Our case showed that we should keep in mind PVT in patients who present with upper gastrointestinal symptoms several days after a major surgery (open colectomy) as a risk factor and oral contraceptive pills (OCP) usage, postpregnancy, and immobility as other risk factors, that the protein C, S, and FVL deficiencies were secondary, and that the PVT can be managed by low molecular weight heparin plus oral warfarin therapy in the continue.

The Natural History, Treatments, and Outcomes of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a poorly described complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to better characterize presentations, compare treatments, and assess outcomes in IBD-related PVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective investigation of IBD-related PVT at our institution. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios across treatments.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients with IBD-related PVT (26 with Crohn disease, 37 with ulcerative colitis) were followed for a median 21 months (interquartile ratio [IQR] = 9-52). Major risk factors included intra-abdominal surgery (60%), IBD flare (33%), and intra-abdominal infection (13%). Primary hematologic thrombophilias were rare and did not impact management. Presentations were generally nonspecific, and diagnosis was incidental. Ninety-two percent of patients (58/63) received anticoagulation (AC), including 23 who received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), 22 who received warfarin, and 13 who received enoxaparin. All anticoagulated patients started AC within 3 days of diagnosis. Complete radiographic resolution (CRR) of PVT occurred in 71% of patients. We found that DOACs were associated with higher CRR rates (22/23; 96%) relative to warfarin (12/22; 55%): the hazard ratio of DOACs to warfarin was 4.04 (1.83-8.93; P = 0.0006)). Patients receiving DOACs required shorter courses of AC (median 3.9 months; IQR = 2.7-6.1) than those receiving warfarin (median 8.5 months; IQR = 3.9-NA; P = 0.0190). Incidence of gut ischemia (n = 3), symptomatic portal hypertension (n = 3), major bleeding (n = 4), and death (n = 2) were rare, and no patients receiving DOACs experienced these adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that early and aggressive use of AC can lead to excellent outcomes in IBD-associated PVT and that DOACs are associated with particularly favorable outcomes in this setting.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Portal Venous System Thrombosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at risk of developing portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) with worse outcomes. This study aims to explore the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of PVST among patients with IBD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All the eligible studies were divided according to the history of colorectal surgery. Only the prevalence of PVST in patients with IBD was pooled if the history of colorectal surgery was unclear. The incidence of PVST in patients with IBD after colorectal surgery was pooled if the history of colorectal surgery was clear. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of PVST were pooled by only a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients undergoing imaging examinations. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies with 143,659 patients with IBD were included. Among the studies where the history of colorectal surgery was unclear, the prevalence of PVST was 0.99, 1.45, and 0.40% in ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD), and unclassified IBD, respectively. Among the studies where all the patients underwent colorectal surgery, the incidence of PVST was 6.95, 2.55, and 3.95% in UC, CD, and unclassified IBD after colorectal surgery, respectively. Both the prevalence and incidence of PVST became higher in patients with IBD undergoing imaging examinations. Preoperative corticosteroids therapy (OR = 3.112, 95% CI: 1.017-9.525; p = 0.047) and urgent surgery (OR = 1.799, 95% CI: 1.079-2.998; p = 0.024) are significant risk factors of PVST in patients with IBD after colorectal surgery. The mortality of patients with IBD with PVST after colorectal surgery was 4.31% (34/789).

CONCLUSION

PVST is not rare, but potentially lethal in patients with IBD after colorectal surgery. More severe IBD, indicated by preoperative corticosteroids and urgent surgery, is associated with a higher risk of PVST after colorectal surgery. Therefore, screening for PVST by imaging examinations and antithrombotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients should be actively considered.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Registered on PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42020159579.

Postoperative Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) can occur after colorectal surgery. Most previous studies included patients with various diseases, especially inflammatory bowel disease. The prevalence and clinical significance of PMVT developing after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent resection for CRC between June 2003 and April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative PMVT was diagnosed based on pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Postoperative PMVT developed in 10 (0.24%) of 4232 patients who underwent resection for CRC. One patient had alcoholic liver cirrhosis, whereas nine did not have prior or current liver disease. PMVT in eight patients was detected within 2 weeks after surgery by CT, performed to evaluate non-specific symptoms such as mild fever and abdominal pain, or performed postoperatively after deep pelvic dissection. PMVT in the remaining two asymptomatic patients was diagnosed following surveillance CT 3 and 7 months after surgery, respectively. PMVT in the patient with liver cirrhosis was detected 13 days after surgery and found to involve the main portal vein, causing hyperbilirubinemia and requiring emergency thrombectomy with thrombolysis. PMVT in the nine patients without liver disease was resolved by anticoagulation therapy or conservative care without long-term complications.

CONCLUSION

PMVT after CRC surgery is likely an early postoperative event in most patients. The incidence of clinically significant PMVT in patients with CRC may be lower than previously reported. CT was reliable in the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients. Most patients with PMVT can be managed conservatively without serious long-term morbidity.

Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Medically Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an under-recognized complication of colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the rate and risk factors for PMVT in patients undergoing surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of medically refractory UC patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2016 at a single tertiary care center was conducted. PMVT was defined as thrombus within the portal, splenic, superior, or inferior mesenteric vein on postoperative abdominal computed tomography scans. Factors associated with PMVT on univariable analysis were tested in multivariable analysis. Clinical relevance of risk factors was examined with receiver operating characteristic curves and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 434 patients were identified. Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis was administered to 428 (98.5%) inpatients for a mean duration of 7.7 ± 0.17 days. PMVT developed in 36 (8.3%) patients a mean interval of 55.3 ± 10.8 days after index surgery. The majority of PMVT occurred after subtotal colectomy, and the most common initial symptom was abdominal pain. Preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) was associated with PMVT (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.02; P = 0.01), and the optimal predictive CRP threshold was 45 mg/L. The rate of PMVT development was greater for patients with CRP >45 mg/L (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PMVT can present as abdominal pain and occur multiple weeks after discharge. Further studies are needed to identify the appropriate postoperative outpatient thrombosis prophylaxis regimen for at-risk patients.

Judging the J pouch: a pictorial review

Restorative total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgery of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, ulcerative colitis with high-grade dysplasia or multi-focal low-grade dysplasia, and for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The natural history of the surgery is favorable, and patients generally experience improved quality of life and acceptable long-term functional outcome. However, some patients experience significant long-term morbidity from early and/or late pouch-related complications. When complications arise, radiologists must understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various imaging modalities that can be used to assess the pouch. Radiologist familiarity with the surgical technique, pouch anatomy, and imaging appearance of the various potential early and late complications will help facilitate appropriate clinical and surgical decision-making. This review provides an anatomic-based imaging review of the pouch and pouch-related complications, including numerous illustrative fluoroscopic and cross-sectional imaging examples.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.

METHODS

Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Review article: the pathogenesis of pouchitis

BACKGROUND

A total proctocolectomy followed by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a potentially curative surgery for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. About 5-35% of patients with ulcerative colitis and 0-11% of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis develop subsequent inflammation of the ileal pouch termed pouchitis.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive analysis of the research studying the possible pathogenesis of pouchitis. The goals were to identify promising areas of investigation, to help focus clinicians, researchers and patients on how to better understand and then potentially manage ileal pouchitis, and to provide avenues for future research investigations.

METHODS

This review examined manuscripts from 1981 to 2015 that discussed and/or proposed hypotheses with supportive evidence for the potential underlying pathogenic mechanism for pouchitis.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis of pouchitis is not definitively understood, but various hypotheses have been proposed, including (i) recurrence of ulcerative colitis, (ii) dysbiosis of the ileal pouch microbiota, (iii) deprivation of nutritional short-chain fatty acids, (iv) mucosal ischaemia and oxygen-free radical injury, (v) host genetic susceptibility and (vi) immune dysregulation. However, none of these alone are able to fully explain pouchitis pathogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouchitis, similar to inflammatory bowel disease, is a complex disorder that is not caused by any one single factor. More likely, pouchitis occurs through a combination of both dysregulated host inflammatory mechanisms and interaction with luminal microbiota.

Risk factors associated with portomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis

AIM

Data on risk factors for portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) following abdominal surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with PMVT after surgical treatment for UC.

METHOD

Patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) including diverting ileostomy closure for medically refractory UC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patient-related, disease-related and treatment-related variables were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess factors associated with PMVT.

RESULTS

Of the 521 patients completing surgical treatment for UC between 2006 and 2012, symptomatic PMVT occurred in 36 (7%), which resulted in a significantly increased hospital stay (P < 0.001). Patients developing PMVT were younger (P = 0.014), had a lower preoperative albumin level (P = 0.037) and were more likely to have been taking steroids within 1 month before surgery (P = 0.006). The combined incidence of PMVT was comparable between patients having a three-stage and two-stage management (6% vs. 8%, P = 0.43), but the relative incidence of PMVT after RPC + IPAA was 8%, significantly higher than the 4% after total abdominal colectomy (TAC) (P = 0.005) and the 2% after subsequent completion proctectomy (CP) + IPAA (P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis confirmed that RPC + IPAA was associated with a significantly greater risk of PMVT than CP + IPAA (OR = 4.9, P = 0.003) or TAC (OR = 3.5, P = 0.011). Preoperative steroid use was an independent factor for PMVT (OR = 5.8, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Steroid use 1 month before surgery is associated with an increased risk of PMVT. A staged restorative proctocolectomy does not increase the overall incidence of PMVT.

Postoperative portomesenteric venous thrombosis: lessons learned from 1,069 consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resections

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PVT) is a known complication after open and laparoscopic colorectal (LCR) surgery. Risk factors and the prognosis of PVT have been poorly described.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patients with new-onset postoperative abdominal pain were evaluated with a computed tomography scan of the abdomen. Patients found to have PVT were analyzed. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of PVT.

RESULTS

A total of 1,069 patients undergoing LCR surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or nonmetastatic cancer between June 2002 and June 2012 were included. Altogether, 37 (3.5 %) patients experienced symptomatic postoperative PVT. On univariate analysis, IBD (p < 0.001), ulcerative colitis (p = 0.016), preoperative therapy with steroids (p = 0.008), operative time ≥220 min (p = 0.004), total proctocolectomy (TPC) (p < 0.001), ileoanal pouch anastomosis (p = 0.006), and postoperative intraabdominal septic complications (p < 0.001) were found to be significant risk factors. By multivariate analysis, TPC (p = 0.026) and postoperative intraabdominal septic complications (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of PVT. In the PVT group, postoperative length of stay was longer (14.8 vs. 7.4 days, p < 0.001). Of the patients evaluated with a hematologic workup, 72.7 % were found to have a hypercoagulable condition. All patients were managed with oral anticoagulation for at least 6 months. No death or complications related to PVT occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT is a potentially serious complication that is more likely to occur after TPC and in the presence of postoperative intraabdominal septic complications, particularly in patients with a coagulation disorder. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with oral anticoagulation are recommended to avoid long-term sequelae.

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis following major colon and rectal surgery: incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an uncommon complication of abdominal surgery. The objective of this study was to assess PMVT risk factor profiles and patient outcomes after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A single center retrospective review of patients undergoing colorectal surgery was performed (2007-2012). PMVT was defined as thrombus within the portal, splenic, or superior mesenteric vein on computed tomography (CT). Inferior mesenteric vein thrombosis was excluded. Independent samples t test was used to compare data variables between PMVT and non-PMVT patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess PMVT risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 1,224 patients included (mean age 62 years, male = 566). Elective bowel resection was performed for colon carcinoma (n = 302), rectal carcinoma (n = 112), ulcerative colitis (n = 125), Crohn's disease (n = 78), polyps (n = 117), and diverticulitis (n = 215). Patients undergoing gynecological resections and emergent laparotomies were included (n = 275). Thirty-six patients (3%) were diagnosed with PMVT by CT: 17/36 on initial presentation and 19/36 by expert radiologist review. Patients with PMVT were younger (53 vs. 62 years, p = 0.001) with higher BMI (30.5 vs. 26.7, p < 0.001) and thrombocytosis (464 vs. 306, p < 0.001) compared to patients without PMVT. Univariate logistic regression identified younger age (p < 0.001), obesity (p < 0.001), ulcerative colitis (p < 0.001), thrombocytosis, (p < 0.001) and proctocolectomy as significant predictors of PMVT. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression identified that obesity (p < 0.001), thrombocytosis, (p < 0.001) and restorative proctocolectomy (p = 0.001) were still significant predictors. No patients in the PMVT group suffered bowel infarction and no related mortalities occurred. Thirty-day readmission rates were higher in the PMVT group (53% vs. 17%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), thrombocytosis, and restorative proctocolectomy were significant predictors of PMVT. Initial diagnostic studies showed a PMVT rate of 1.4%; however, after expert focused radiologic review, the actual rate was 3%. Thus, the diagnosis of PMVT is difficult and readmission after colorectal surgery should prompt its consideration.

Systematic review: The epidemiology of the hepatobiliary manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Extraintestinal manifestations are frequent in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Most studies published so far focused on viral hepatitis and liver toxicity of IBD-related drugs.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review of hepatobiliary manifestations associated with IBD. We excluded viral hepatitis and liver toxicity of IBD-related drugs.

METHODS

Studies were identified through the electronic database of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the annual meetings of Digestive Disease Week, the American College of Gastroenterology, the United European Gastroenterology Week and the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty six articles were included in this systematic review. Cholelithiasis is more frequent in Crohn's disease (CD) than in general population. Prevalence of cholelithiasis in CD ranged from 11% to 34%, whereas it ranges from 5.5% to 15% in non-IBD patients. PSC is more frequent in UC than in CD. Prevalence of PSC ranges from 0.76% to 5.4% in UC and from 1.2% to 3.4% in CD. There is a male predominance when PSC is associated with UC, with a male/female ratio ranging from 65/35 to 70/30. No conclusion can be made on a possible increased risk of gall-bladder carcinoma. Mean prevalence of fatty liver is 23% (range, 1.5-55%). Hepatic amyloidosis occurs in less than 1% of IBD. Liver abscess is encountered mainly in CD. Portal vein thrombosis occurs in 39% to 45% of IBD patients undergoing proctocolectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatobiliary manifestations associated with inflammatory bowel diseases are frequent and probably underdiagnosed.

Intra-abdominal venous thrombosis after colectomy in pediatric patients with chronic ulcerative colitis: incidence, treatment, and outcomes

PURPOSE

Children with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism, especially after colectomy procedures. We aim to review our patients with CUC who underwent a colectomy and suffered intra-abdominal thrombosis; moreover we wanted to define thrombotic incidence and outcomes

METHODS

In this is IRB approved retrospective study, we reviewed our patients who underwent colectomy for CUC from January 1999 to December 2011 for development of intra-abdominal thrombosis.

RESULTS

Of 366 patients with CUC who underwent colectomy, 15 (4%) were diagnosed with a venous thromboembolism. All patients presented with acute abdominal pain. The locations of thrombus formation varied: 13 (87%) developed thrombi in the portal vein, 4 (27%) in the splenic vein, 2 (13%) in the superior mesenteric vein, 1 (7%) in the hepatic vein, and 1 (7%) in the hepatic artery. The mean number of post-operative days at diagnosis of thrombus was 38.7 days (range 3-180 days). Fourteen patients (93%) underwent anticoagulation for treatment. The mean number of days of anticoagulant therapy until documented resolution of thrombus on imaging was 96.3 days (range 14-364 days). All thrombi resolved with therapy. There was no mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Four percent of our pediatric patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent colectomy developed symptomatic intra-abdominal venous thromboembolism. 3 to 6 months of anticoagulant therapy is adequate treatment in almost all patients. Practitioners should have a high index of suspicion for intra-abdominal venous thrombus when these patients complain of abdominal pain postoperatively. Based on our experience, prophylactic anticoagulation should be strongly considered peri-operatively in this population.

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a high risk of deep venous thromboembolism. However, few data are available so far on portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of PMVT in patients with IBD.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at 13 GETAID (Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif) centers from January 1995 to June 2010. The following data were collected, using a standardized questionnaire: characteristics of IBD, disease status at the time of PMVT, PMVT characteristics and mode of discovery, concomitant prothrombotic disorders, anticoagulant therapy, and evolution of PMVT.

RESULTS

Fifty cases (29 men and 21 women; median age, 41 years) were identified, including 14 patients with ulcerative colitis and 36 with Crohn's disease. Thirty-one patients (62%) presented with acute PMVT. Twenty-four patients had previously undergone surgical treatment, and IBD was active in 23 cases (77%) of acute thrombosis. The discovery of PMVT was fortuitous in 40% of our cases. Among the 43 patients screened for a prothrombotic disorder, abnormalities were observed in 17 patients (40%) (mainly hyperhomocysteinemia, n = 12). Forty-four patients (88%) were treated with anticoagulants. Recanalization of the vein was significantly more successful in patients with acute thrombosis (65% versus 37%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PMVT can occur when IBD is inactive, and its diagnosis was fortuitous in 40% of our cases. Screening for prothrombotic disorders is essential because it is positive in more than one third of cases.

The role of portal vein thrombosis in the clinical course of inflammatory bowel diseases: report on three cases and review of the literature

Inflammatory bowel diseases are associated with an increased risk of vascular complications. The most important are arterial and venous thromboembolisms, which are considered as specific extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases. Among venous thromboembolism events, portal vein thrombosis has been described in inflammatory bowel diseases. We report three cases of portal vein thrombosis occurring in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. In two of them, hepatic abscess was present. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review based on the clinical literature published on this topic.

Clinical and radiographic presentation of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in Crohn's disease: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) is a rare and frequently underdiagnosed complication of Crohn's disease (CD). This study describes the clinical and radiological characteristics of CD /patients with superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) diagnosed by CT/MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The database of Crohn's disease patients treated in Sheba Medical Center between 2005-2010 was searched for MVT diagnosis. Imaging studies of identified patients were retrieved and reviewed by an experienced abdominal radiologist. MVT was defined by superior mesenteric vein obliteration and/or thrombus in the vessel lumen on abdominal imaging. The clinical and radiologic data of these patients were collected from the medical records.

RESULTS

MVT was demonstrated in 6/460 CD patients. Five patients had stricturing disease, and one patient had a combined fistulizing and stricturing disease phenotype. All patients had small bowel disease, but 3/6 also had colonic involvement. No patient had a prior thromboembolic history or demonstrable hypercoagulability. One patient had an acute SMV thrombus demonstrable on CT scanning, the remaining patients showed an obliteration of superior mesenteric vein. Two patients received anticoagulation upon diagnosis of thrombosis. No subsequent thromboembolic events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of mesenteric vein thrombosis is likely to be underestimated in patients with Crohn's disease. Both CT and MRI imaging demonstrate the extent of enteric disease and coincident SMV thrombosis. In our cohort, thrombosis was associated with stricturing disease of the small bowel. The clinical impact of SMV thrombosis and whether anticoagulation is mandatory for all of these patients remains to be determined.

Portal vein thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been reported as a complication of IBD in some case reports. We describe the presentation, diagnostic approaches, underlying risks factors and clinical outcome of 8 IBD patients with PVT. CASE-SERIES: The patients presented with partial PVT (4 patients) or portal cavernoma. Five patients had undergone surgery. In 2 patients portal biliopathy was diagnosed after detection of PVT. In 4 patients, the diagnosis of PVT was made while IBD was in remission. Five patients showed at least one risk factor for hypercoagulability: lupus anti-coagulant (one patient), increased von Willebrand factor (2 patients) or homocysteine levels (4 patients). Four patients received anticoagulant therapy for 6 months. None experienced other thrombotic events during a median of 5 years (range 2-8 years).

CONCLUSION

PVT is a potential complication of IBD, usually associated with acquired or inherited risks factors for hypercoagulability and with a benign outcome.

Hepatobiliary complications of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic idiopathic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are frequently encountered in IBD patients. Hepatobiliary manifestations are common extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), nonalcoholic fatty liver, cholelithiasis, primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), small-duct PSC, IgG4-associated cholangitis (IAC), granulomatous hepatitis, amyloidosis, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), PSC/AIH overlap syndrome, and portal vein thrombosis. In this paper, we describe the progress in understanding the hepatobiliary complications associated with IBD.

Portal vein thrombosis after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis and sigmoid cancer

Postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is rare, but has been described after various open as well as minimal access abdominal operations, especially splenectomy and colorectal surgical procedures. We report the case of a 39-year-old female who underwent restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis with sigmoid cancer. She presented 14 days later with vague upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and high output stoma. Doppler ultrasonography confirmed PVT and therefore anticoagulant therapy was started. Her condition improved dramatically and she underwent closure of ileostomy after finishing adjuvant chemotherapy. She remained well at 3-year follow-up with good pouch function and no local or distant recurrence. A high index of suspicion is essential for early diagnosis and prompt treatment of postoperative PVT after restorative proctocolectomy. Early anticoagulation is essential to avoid subsequent complications.

Liver disorders in inflammatory bowel disease

Disorders of the hepatobiliary system are relatively common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These disorders are sometimes due to a shared pathogenesis with IBD as seen in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and small-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis (small-duct PSC). There are also hepatobiliary manifestations such as cholelithiasis and portal vein thrombosis that occur due to the effects of chronic inflammation and the severity of bowel disease. Lastly, medications used in IBD such as sulfasalazine, thiopurines, and methotrexate can adversely affect the liver. It is important to be cognizant of these disorders as some do have serious long-term consequences. The management of these disorders often requires the expertise of multidisciplinary teams to achieve the best outcomes.

Intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems with ileoanal pouches

BACKGROUND

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been developed and refined since its introduction in the late 1970s. Nonetheless, it is a procedure associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this review was to provide a structured approach to the challenges that surgeons and physicians encounter in the management of intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems associated with ileoanal pouches.

METHODS

The review was based on relevant studies identified from an electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases from 1975 to April 2011. There were no language or publication year restrictions. Original references in published articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Although the majority of patients experience long-term success with an ileoanal pouch, significant morbidity surrounds IPAA. Surgical intervention is often critical to achieve optimal control of the situation.

CONCLUSION

A structured management plan will minimize the adverse consequences of the problems associated with pouches.

Prospective noninvasive analysis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with Crohn's disease: correlation of transient elastography and laboratory-based markers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatobiliary disorders, associated either with extraintestinal manifestations or with consequences of treatment, are prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to prospectively assess the potential of noninvasive markers for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients were recruited. Established markers of fibrosis, namely, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrotest, Forns, sonography, and transient elastography were performed and correlated with disease parameters. In addition to descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined. The t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were applied and univariate and multivariate data analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Ultrasound indicated hepatic steatosis in 33 patients, hepatomegaly in 10, and cirrhosis in two. Liver stiffness as quantified by transient elastography was determined to be 5.06±2.33 kPa (2.6-21.5). Results of noninvasive liver fibrosis markers were as follows: fibrotest,-1.65±0.94; APRI, 0.33±0.22; and Forns, 3.11±2.00. Correlation coefficients were found to be fibrotest/transient elastography: r=0.35291; APRI/transient elastography: r=0.38442; Forns/transient elastography: r=0.33949; fibrotest/APRI: r=0.52937; fibrotest/Forns: r=0.42413; and APRI/Forns: r=0.56491. Correlation of inflammatory markers and noninvasive liver fibrosis tests, respectively, was generally negative, whereas correlation of parameters indicating liver damage and liver fibrosis tests, respectively, was generally positive.

CONCLUSION

In a center-based, unselected cohort of patients with Crohn's disease, the positive correlations between laboratory-based markers of fibrosis and transient elastography were highly significant. A study correlating noninvasive and invasive tools for the assessment of liver fibrosis in IBD is reasonable.

Hepatobiliary disorders and complications of inflammatory bowel disease

One of typical examples of liver-gut cross talk is the interaction and impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and hepatobiliary (HB) abnormalities on each other's disease course. There are several layers of association between IBD and HB diseases: (i) HB diseases and IBD share pathogenetic mechanisms; (ii) HB diseases parallel structural and pathophysiological changes seen with IBD; and (iii) hepatic toxicity is associated with medical therapy for IBD. Interdisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, hepatologists and, in advanced cases, general, colorectal, and liver transplant surgeons, is advocated.

Perioperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease

Almost 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will undergo surgery for their disease at some stage of its clinical course. Complications seen following surgery may occur early or late in the postoperative period. Patient factors, including active inflammatory disease, malnutrition, and use of immunosuppressant medications, make these patients a challenging surgical group and at increased risk for surgical complications. The purpose of this review is to characterize the complications that are commonly seen following surgery in patients with IBD and to discuss the surgical and patient factors that may influence their development.

Comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be affected by other unrelated diseases. These are called comorbid conditions, and can include any secondary health problem that affects a person suffering from a primary or main disease, and which is neither linked physiopathologically to the primary condition, nor is it due to the treatments used for the primary condition or to its long-term anatomical or physiological consequences. Different comorbid conditions, as well as their influence on IBD, are discussed.

Hepatopancreatobiliary manifestations and complications associated with inflammatory bowel disease

Diseases involving the hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) system are frequently encountered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hepatobiliary manifestations constitute some of the most common extraintestinal manifestations of IBD. They appear to occur with similar frequency in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. HPB manifestations may occur in following settings: 1) disease possibly associated with a shared pathogenetic mechanism with IBD including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), small-duct PSC/pericholangitis and PSC/autoimmune hepatitis overlap, acute and chronic pancreatitis related to IBD; 2) diseases which parallel structural and physiological changes seen with IBD, including cholelithiasis, portal vein thrombosis, and hepatic abscess; and 3) diseases related to adverse effects associated with treatment of IBD, including drug-induced hepatitis, pancreatitis (purine-based agents), or liver cirrhosis (methotrexate), and reactivation of hepatitis B, and biologic agent-associated hepatosplenic lymphoma. Less common HPB manifestations that have been described in association with IBD include autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), IgG4-associated cholangitis (IAC), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), fatty liver, granulomatous hepatitis, and amyloidosis. PSC is the most significant hepatobiliary manifestation associated with IBD and poses substantial challenges in management requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The natural disease course of PSC may progress to cirrhosis and ultimately require liver transplantation in spite of total proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis. The association between AIP, IAC, and elevated serum IgG4 in patients with PSC is intriguing. The recently reported association between IAC and IBD may open the door to investigate these complex disorders. Further studies are warranted to help understand the pathogenesis of HPB manifestations associated with IBD, which would help clinicians better manage these patients. An interdisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, hepatologists, and, in advanced cases, general, colorectal, and transplant surgeons is advocated.

Portal vein thrombus after pediatric proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis

In adults, mesenteric venous thrombosis with extension into the portal system is a known complication of total proctocolectomy with pouch ileoanal anastomosis. Although frequently reported in adults, this complication is rare in pediatric patients undergoing this operation. We report 2 cases of adolescent patients with ulcerative colitis who experienced portal vein thrombosis after this procedure. Both were treated with systemic anticoagulation therapy with complete resolution of their clots. We recommend that mesenteric/portal venous thrombosis be considered in the differential diagnosis in any child presenting with fever, abdominal pain, and leukocytosis after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anastomosis and that imaging obtained to evaluate abdominal complaints in this population be directed toward ruling out this complication.

Asymmetric endoscopic inflammation of the ileal pouch: a sign of ischemic pouchitis?

BACKGROUND

Pouchitis is associated with dysbiosis and dysregulated mucosal immunity, although secondary pouchitis with special etiologic factors, such as ischemia, can occur. The aim was to describe a disease phenotype of the ileal pouch with an endoscopic appearance suggestive of ischemia.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients with endoscopic asymmetric inflammation of the pouch (inflammation of side of the pouch with a completely normal other limb of the pouch one limb and a sharp demarcation along the staple suture line). Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch or antibiotic-responsive pouchitis, matched for duration of the pouch, served as controls. Histology slides of mucosal biopsies were re-reviewed independently by 2 blinded gastrointestinal pathologists. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and imaging characteristics were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Ten patients with "ischemic" pouchitis, 15 with CD of the pouch, and 15 with antibiotic-responsive pouchitis were studied. Pyloric gland metaplasia was observed only in the groups with CD of the pouch (23.1%) or antibiotic-responsive pouchitis (13.3%). Of patients with "ischemic" pouchitis, 80% had extracellular hemosiderin or hematoidin deposits (versus 30.8% those with CD of the pouch and 13.3% of those with pouchitis, P = 0.003). The majority of patients (80%) with "ischemic" pouchitis did not respond to conventional antibiotic therapy. It appeared that subsequent abdominal surgeries after pouch construction and a history of postoperative portal vein thrombi were associated with "ischemic" pouchitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic asymmetric inflammation of the pouch may represent an ischemia-associated pouchitis with characteristic clinical, radiographic, and histologic features. Its hemodynamic, cellular, and molecular basis of mechanism warrants further study.

Ileal J-pouch perforation at the blind end: report of a case

A 34-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain 8 years after undergoing ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (UC). Computed tomography (CT) showed free air and ascites in the abdomen, so she underwent laparotomy. A perforation was found at the ileal J-pouch blind end, which was remarkably enlarged. When we resected the blind end surgically, we observed a 3-mm perforation and some small ulcers. About 2 months after this operation, the patient complained of abdominal pain and an increased frequency of bowel movements. Based on our endoscopic observation of multiple ulcers, we diagnosed pouchitis. We report this case to show that the combination of an enlarged J-pouch blind end and pouchitis can result in perforation. To prevent such complications, we recommend avoiding the formation of a blind end during construction of a J-pouch.

Intra-abdominal venous and arterial thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease

Venous and arterial thromboembolism constitutes a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The most common thrombotic manifestations are lower extremity deep vein thromboses with or without pulmonary embolism. Occasionally, thromboembolic events occur in the main abdominal vessels, such as the portal and superior mesenteric veins, vena cava and hepatic vein, aorta, splanchnic and iliac arteries, or in the limb arteries. The decision-making process for the treatment of these uncommon thromboembolic complications in inflammatory bowel disease may be very challenging for several reasons: 1) no standardized therapies are available; 2) the decision of starting anticoagulant therapy implies the potential risk of intestinal bleeding; 3) thromboembolic events may recur and be life-threatening if inadequately treated. The literature was searched by using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library database. Studies published between 1970 and 2007 were reviewed. We discuss the medical and surgical therapeutic options that should be considered to optimize the outcome and reduce the risk of complications in abdominal thromboembolisms associated with inflammatory bowel disease.